because we want to see very fast cars, or very cheap/slow cars. dont show me the acceleration of a v6 mustang, I want to see bugattis or ford fiestas.

Because I own one of the smallest 2001 focus mk1s ever made and mine runs a fiesta engine and everyone hated them. Now there making a 1.0 eco boost. And you can get the same engine in the focus. So people want to view the difference

I want to see the difference between this and a mk3 focus.

You are here too stupide

Must be american

it will melt

mine hits around 115 in 2nd and it is the same model, quite cool

Yeah this car is nice,

👏👏👏

Why? its one of the worst engines designs of the 21st century. It has a wet timing belt that sheds rubber particles into the oil causing the oil pump and strainer to jam up and starve the engine of oil causing them to blow up. Replacing the timing belt costs over £1000 too on an economy car. It also had issues with coolant too. Its an abysmal engine as is the 1.2 pure tech from PSA. The best small displacement turbo petrol engine is the 1.2T I4 engine from Toyota featured in the Toyota Auris and CHR, its smooth, economical, pulls incredibly well and is flawlessly reliable and has a timing chain.

there's a 140hp (stock) version

Azathoth link?

Brandon Clark google Fiesta Black/Red edition

The Daihatsu Charade GTTi (mk3 1987/1993) had 101HP @ 6500 rpm, 130NM @3500 rpm. 0-100 8.1 sec. topspeed was185 km/h back then. keeping this in mind not so utopic,I guess.

Module79L utopic is the new volkswagen project... 1L 3cylinder 270hp

tavi921 my father has the zetec s version,when he said it comes and goes I didn't know he ment this fast😂😂

tavi921

tavi921 - I can't imagine it'll be reliable or that it'll last long though.

@@markfox1545 well, the first ones are 7 or 8 years old now...........Some have 100k, some 200k kilometers....so say that again. A BMW V6 is less reliable than 200.000. Or a VW TSI or TFSI has a hard time even getting to 100.000 without big repairs.... so pretty reliable compared so some competition i would say.

@@dom3827 Ummm actually the early versions of the 1.0 ecoboost are notorious for having serious problems with headgasket failure and even the cyclinder head itself cracking they have fixed the issues but the early ones have had major issues sure some did just fine but others have blown at 30k miles due to the initial poor design, also these engines struggle to achieve 40mpg. Overall they are rubbish. I'll stick to the 1.2 engine Toyota offers which drives with all the benefits of a Diesel and a petrol with none of the negatives.

BIG Dave good one buddy

These ecoboost engines use high pressure direct injection, and big turbos, squeezes a lot more power than you’d think out of the 1.0 litres

Catholic Yeah I agree with you their, I reckon the next generation of these engines will hold up a lot better, I’ve got the 1.6 diesel in mine

@@thomasmason8481 big turbo? have u seen the size of the Ecoboost turbo it's tiny

HENRY HALL yeah but it runs 20 odd PSI so

It's only 120 mph

@@codyfolsom365 yep well 124

YzFDyL lmfao I’m not my tundra does that in 30 sec

Muahaha

@@dennistv598 yea your Tundra only eats a tiny bit more than this car/engine indeed.

needed to add: with same p.s. and bigger weight. Nothing unexpected.

Yea but 1.8 can be used 30 years, but this 1.0 maybe 5 to 10 years of driving

@@spartan7306 lol, все зависит от пробега, а не от возраста авто

@@user-rt1pj4wh7v ну да, вытащить мотор, законсервировать его, отложить в уголок лет на 30, потом завести и сказать О работает!

@@artemfilatov8161 Русские общаются на английском. Россия хуле

😆

probably a piece of shit like all the other fords

That's why I've seen Fords with 700,000km with original motor and tranny...

+k rome84 I probably see as many old ford's as I do hondas and toyotas and they're constantly pushing 300k miles.

my mom's has 97,000 runs fine

What mpg ?

@@yusufknowsit7674 can’t remember specifics, however from full I’d get about 650 a tank and wouldn’t need to fill up again for about 2 weeks worth of city and highway driving. 1.5 weeks if I was feeling a little heavy footed lol

sell the suzuki and buy a ford fiesta 1.0 liter 125hp, the turbo engines are fantastic and cheap

Im very sure it can reach more than 140. My fiesta 2005 1.4 with 70ps ive done 180 on it with 4 people

+TerryMMA no one sells 2.0 non turbos in europe anymore.

mazda still does

Tuvia sure but it is the norm today. even for a ferrari

its working as hard as a old 1 litre from 15 years ago, its just the build quality if more efficient which results in more power output. if it has 120 hp vs 180hp of a 2 litre both work equally as hard to get the max hp they can do. As long as the engine build quality is more more than the rated hp itl be fine. a shit 2 litre can die much faster than a great 1.0 i have seen it

This 1.0 engine is able to bring 215+HP

Fals3Agent yeah, 200km/h! My mum's Toyota RAV4 with a N/A 2.5 L engine can barely get to 180km/h!

@@DYWTE diesels don't go that fast, they top out at 4-5k RPM

tristan 123455 the engine is the 2AR-FE. Which is a petrol 4 cylinder that has like 170HP on the flywheel

@@tristan6509 rpm != top speed. rpm has nothing to do with the top speed.

@@DYWTE oh ok, isn't 2500cc petrol engines gas hoggers? Especially in a big car like that, most 2000cc engines I've heard is in Sedans...

Because of the 3 cylinder, the sound is a little more aggressive.

Keep in mind that the speakers also pump in fake intake noise on most modern cars -.- so almost all of the EcoBoost cars sound the same on the interior, kind of relying on the exhaust system to beef up the note

I wouldn't question your intelligence but are you sure they would do this on a little hatchback? I know our M5 does this. It sucks.

rOCKINxsOCKIN on most modern fords they don't push fake noise they actually have slots going from the engine to the interior so you can hear the engine naturally. And the. V6 sound is a 3 cylinder sound. I like them too

yes its the exhaust, the sporty versions of the fiat 500 also have a loud exhaust

Because the car is designed for good fuel economy, it being nippy is a side effect of turbocharging

Xestryke he was in reverse

Digi20. What's wrong with the gear ratios??

160 kmh in 3rd gear? crazy long.

Geared for economy, as long as the engine has hp and torque which it does its fine, given the engine build quality is good, NOT to be confused with engine size, it isnt the size of the engine that lets it last its the build quality, 80s and 90s cars engines were solid regardless of the size.

Nebbia affaraccimiei my car does 85mph in 3rd

stfu

because its 3 cylinders !

@@alistairupton1960 stfu

My 100hp version got 156hp now, and i also fitted a Airtec rev 1 intercooler, but now traction is a huge problem and it torque steers like a bitch..

very nice result! I've heard both are the same engine, but great for you to confirm it! Not bad complaints to have.

Torque steer at 156BHP, that's hilarious! Hold on tight pal haha...

Yeah i know it doesn't have 300hp, issues are mainly because i still have the original wheels and eco tires..

Yea, those ecotires are quiet nasty... in which country du you drive? in germany, we get a combination of winter- and summertires... so they are never awesome - weather in the rain, sun or snow... My first thing to do with the fiesta, was to enjoy the car and rub down those tires :D

Basically did that with a 1.4L 32 years old Ford orion. Almost blew the engine, going over 7000rpm 🤣 blessed carburetted cars without fuel cut out

Dark Royale - wow. You repeated the inane 'Legend says...' thing. You really did that. Loser.

Mark Fox it was just a joke whats the problem. Loser.

That's the point everyone here seems to miss. A friend of mine had a 1.1 litre Ford Escort from 1977. The claimed 0-100 km/h (60 mph) time was 22.9 seconds. We put a stopwatch on it. 44 seconds. No joking.

NO, you kill the fun!

knightrider1545 yeah maybe but there is no power remaining after 6k rpm ^^

PlaysGames11 and its much better for the pistons!

PlaysGames11 I disagree, if you want the max performance you have to shift like he does, at 6500 rpm...because ok yes there is not much left after 6K rpm, BUT by shifting gears at 6k rpm you will fall too low on the next gear, which will lower the overall performance. The gear ratio is already very long (more than 100 kph in 2nd gear...), so to compensate you have to rev it to the red line.

bebertease OK for the first two gears, but when you get to third gear you can almost see that the engine is running out of power

Remember it’s kmh

Kilometers not miles per hour

Its fast i know

@@gabrielvieira6529 Its still not legit.

@@jakelamotta2387 got a 1L-T fiesta myself, first is a bit of a rocketship for what the car is, 2nd and 3rd are slower

sadly the majority in america still thinks the bigger the better and they are far behind time. I am glad i live in Europe and get the better cars.

4th and 5th are pretty tall but that's because it's an economy car. I've driven one that's chipped to 145 hp and those don't struggle as much in 4th and 5th. chipped ones also have 50% more torque tho

Those gears are for sippin gas on the highway.

lol ??? ..very nice engine ? :D ...to max 100 000km ;) ...

Lubo Mesaros noob its a good city car

A Dz u are right on that. Only a good city car.

+Lukas Schulin Not sure where you are in the world, but here in Australasia they come with the awesome 6-speed Powershift dual-clutch transmission. I got to drive one just yesterday, and it actually felt better (on the motorway) than the manual with that extra ratio.

+sr36511 it might change quicker on upshifts but the downshift are slow, I took the manual and its awesome

gladly they finaly put a nice 6 speed box in the new fiesta.

@@sr36511 you mean the PowerShit transmission that has a class action lawsuit against it? Lmao!

In U.K. The new focus 1.0 turbo has 6 gears

I remember these well. You a bass player by any chance?

Link?

Kalle Klæp it has turbocharged bro

Look at the dash, it's in km/h. 200=124mph. This thing's slow as fuck.

Slow as heck? 200kmph is fast. Even for a 1.6l turbo engine

@@DElionel1995dude, quit driving lawnmowers and try a real car. I've literally driven minivans that fast.

@@Rattus-Norvegicus a van with a bigger motor... I have driven v8 masarati gibly's and bmw's. That don't change the fact that thay 1.0 liter is pretty fast for a 1liter engine.

And in europe we stil know how to drive stick at least ;)

TheJeremyevans An F1 car has like 700+ hp for 1.4 liter, and yes I do understand they have alot of money to spend but still.

Matthew Vincent - don’t think this guy knows how to launch properly tbh

Other than the mustang 2.3, 2.7 and 3.5, they're all weak and slow. I work at a ford dealership and the 1.5 ecoboost is the most gutless engine ever

Over powered? This thing isn't even struggling lol.

Unity101 what It has very hard times to go over 180

What do you mean " over-powered"?

@@tiaanpotgieter2572 over powered? 125 hp / L out of an engine with a cast iron block? that's not even pushing it

Obviously not , it's geared too high it can't do a thing in 5th gear the is too high and not enough power to push it. , Better to be short ratio at least it feels more fun to drive the old mk5 1.6 Zetec S was brilliant

Yeah and that's my opinion to I think that the 3 and 4 gear are too fucking highly configured that's what make the 5th gear without enough power to go more deeper I want to know if the 100PS version are with the same gearbox configuration or not If yes i think the engine will never push in the 5th gear

+souhaib ben farhat At a guess i would say yes, as i cant see ford making a different gearbox for each power variant . Although not as bad its a similar problem in the 1.6 ecoboost focus too. Which why i bought a titanium x 1.6 ecoboost mondeo , its gears are about right for a 1.6 Shorter And more driver enjoyment although 160bhp its not bad but i did remap it as im used to over 200bhp cars anyway . However sadly the mk5 mondeo is too big and heavy for its 1.5 ecoboost

souhaib ben farhat If you were considering one of these ? I would strongly recommend stArt with the 125bhp and superchip it. I think of hand it should be about 150bhp that will help out on the long gears .

souhaib ben farhat I never have a need for 6th in my focus.

I hope your joking, if your not its kmh

@@nimamahdavi5592 oh shit my bad

Brandon so you’d actually believe this car could reach 200 mph 😂😂

Alperen Özarslan . Fiesta ya bu motor yeterde focusada koymuslar . Beni korkutan motorun turboya bagimli olmasi , turbo cok hassas bi illet

👍👍👍

Bence bu motor bu araca yeterli 200 km re hıza bence kosa bir sürede çıktı

BoeingvsAirbus1578 Look at the tempature.

Poul Hansen I did, and as you can see @0:32 there are no bars representing the temperature of the engine coolant, meaning the engine is in its cold start phase.

BoeingvsAirbus1578 it has intercooler n three other engine cooler .devices .b informe

VW quality is worse than Ford, I rather have bit slower acceleration but therefore less trouble with the engine and less maintance cost

You cant compare a Golf with a fiesta. they are in different classes. Rather compare a golf with a ford foucus. Thats a more reasonable comparison. But for a golf to be a split second faster than a fiesta does not say much about the golf

vw quality are very veeery good ...this same ford is good only petrol engine

So far 120,000 abused but trouble free kilometers on mine

its not all about power. And even there this 1L turbo outperforms a 2L NA Engine esaily, probably already in Idle

Ford Fiesta (2013-2023) EcoBoost Engine, 995 cc Fox (Turbo) Engine output: 125 hp at 6000 rpm & 170 Nm at 1400-4500 rpm Toyota Kijang (2000-2004) and Toyota Revo (2000-2005) 1RZ-E Engine, 1998 cc Engine output: 108 hp at 5200 rpm & 167 Nm at 2600 rpm In your opinion, which one is better?

​@@ghyarighyari3712You gotta choose a NA engine with same power. The turbo engine will probably always be faster on low revs, and the NA will be better on high revs. The 2ZR-FAE is a great 1.8 NA engine 150 ps, and has alot of power when you give it gas. Pretty sure 1.8 - 2.0 NA engine with 150 will eat this EcoBoost

I have seen 280 k kilometers and still running smoothly