Bro, His way of teaching is very didactic. And your video is very short, making it easy to follow. You separated the basics in one video, and more features in others, making it really cool to watch. Thank you!!
@MonsterlessonsAcademy11 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@truechannel2k24 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making stuff in soft a lot easier to understand.
@ibrahimkhurshid4339 Жыл бұрын
So well explained.
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@megamind7709 ай бұрын
You're a life saver!
@MonsterlessonsAcademy9 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@zoki5388 Жыл бұрын
You are creating good content. Could you make video about react tables?
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the idea. I will add it to the list
@mrpunch_777_ Жыл бұрын
Good explanation and straight to the point, content was really helpful . By the way, my company is still using formik.
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
As a lot of other companies
@mazingamal35809 ай бұрын
really thanks u bro , u r amazing .. i think it's better than react hook form and very easy
@MonsterlessonsAcademy9 ай бұрын
Most welcome 😊
@zaytungbonn18411 ай бұрын
it was really really good. thanks a lot
@MonsterlessonsAcademy11 ай бұрын
Most welcome 😊
@PraveenKumar-ft2kr10 ай бұрын
Excellent Video . Thank you :)
@MonsterlessonsAcademy10 ай бұрын
You are welcome!
@mateusgomes1086 Жыл бұрын
Formik is no longer supported since June 2021. Just use react-hook-form instead.
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
You are totally right. But there are still lots of companies that use it in production and it is quite stable. And we get new libs that do the same thing too often for my taste :)
@ThiagoVieira9111 ай бұрын
Wow really!? You just made my day. Formik has the same base concepts of Redux-Form, which I'll hate until my death bed. Gonna get this lib out of our project today immediately.
@user-jj3ld6kk2u11 ай бұрын
Very helpful... thank you
@MonsterlessonsAcademy11 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@waleedsharif618 Жыл бұрын
Could you make video about react testing using react testing library + jest ?
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
I will add it to the list of ideas for future videos.
@gubatenkov Жыл бұрын
dont use formik on production. You will get +100500 rerenders on each onChange
@grenadier4702 Жыл бұрын
The thing is not in rerenders but how it affects optimization. Many websites use Formik, so I guess everything's okay with that? :)
@MonsterlessonsAcademy Жыл бұрын
Formik does no magic. If you write plain form handling you will also get rerender every time. Which is totally fine because it allows you to show validation/etc. If you have other cases you might write it differently. I don't really see a problem.
@gubatenkov Жыл бұрын
@@grenadier4702 I know a lot of teams that have and are now rewriting all their site forms from Formik to Hook-form. Any idea why they did this?
@gubatenkov Жыл бұрын
@@MonsterlessonsAcademy no problem until you have to rewrite the code
@grenadier4702 Жыл бұрын
@@gubatenkov Convenience or bad architecture overall, not the problem of Formik
@frozen_tortus4 ай бұрын
"Best posible way", difficult to take you seriously with statements like that backed by 0 evidence. I was hopping you where going to compare it with some other similar form management solutions, but I was left disappointed. If I where you I would restrain myself from polarizing statements like that esspecially if you don't back them up.
@shashankpandey83464 ай бұрын
I really am confused. {formik.errors.email && formik.touched.email && formik.errors.email} In this line, I need to write formik.errors.email twice? It seemed to work touched & error, but not other way around. And is there any hidden catch in touched & errors too?
@MonsterlessonsAcademy4 ай бұрын
You check that you have an error for email and that the field is touched - then you render email error {errors.email && touched.email && {errors.email}}