Forget programming, AI and robotics will change the face of the world in 30-40 years... Almost all the subjects and discussions today have no real future...

Ever seen the Watchman River channel?

@@bighand1530 nope, why?

Don't use Black American slang.

@@jasonhaven7170 Force me

@@jasonhaven7170 make me

Lol europes a mess.

This is about France not Italy so why you throwing that in? According to the German institute Stiftung Markwirtschaft, in 2018, the aggregate explicit debt + implicit debt of Italy is 122%, lower than the German one at 170%.

@@kordellswoffer1520 Japan debt = 263% of their GDP - USA debt = 117 % of their GDP. Debt isn't the only number you should look if you want the strength of their economy.

Every country is a mess. There's not a single country rn that's doing well

@@alganis3339 it’s not. It’s just one of them And Japan is a mess. Their future is stagnate and grim. America is also a mess.

Why did your sister choose Australia and not another country in the European Union with the freedom of movement like Germany or Finland, which would’ve been easier to move to?

@@artman12 She like the country and salaries are way better in Australia than in Germanic or Nordic countries. I also think about going to Germanic and Nordic countries instead of that far away, but I did 2 years in Sweden, and it's that far from France issues.

@@artman12salaries are much higher in anglosphere world like Australia and US

@@abdiganiaden So is rent and cost of life.

@@mrsupremegascon Come to denmark :) 2 hours with flight from Copenhagen and Billund. And if you speak English there will not be that big of a language barrier, compared to Germany i assume.

Nope this is not the UK. Paris is in a bad state compared to its suburbs in terms of infrastructures and new residential buildings

@@user-gr3uv7wy9fwhat are you saying? There is no new buildings in Paris or very few.

La Defense is a jewel in the crown. Most of Paris is not a global superperformer, but a bureaucratic supercentre.

@@walideg5304 your 3 towers are cute do you live there ? No you live in greater London between Rayner's lane and Uxbridge loooooool. The red houses are all in a bad state what are you talking about? Paris is in better shape, and greater paris has new residential buildings everywhere. Your houses do not exist there. We have American houses sorry. Stratford is nice though

@@themsmloveswar3985 Paris is indeed a super performer. World leader in luxury and fashion, world leader in tourism, top 10 as a financial center, top 5 regarding the startup ecosystems. 4 universities in the top 100 in the world. If it’s not a super performer then a I don’t know what it’s. Paris region itself is 30% or France GDP.

france was definitely not doing well, its gdp didn't move an inch while public spendings were exploding. I think there is a hidden recession, and the country is struggling to create value with all its talents immigrating to other countries.

@@luxraider5384 France and Germany two powerhouses of EU.

@@MbisonBalrog france barely produces anything.

Politics, in a nutshell. Every government wants to create the illusion of prosperity by juicing the most commonly used metrics like GDP and growth, typically with the use of debt. Rinse and repeat with every new government.

@@MbisonBalrog Germans are broke because the US exploits them with overpriced LNG. France will now notice less profits from selling Free Uranium from Africa. The Conquest to the World by the G-7 Colonial Empires, looks like it has hit a rough patch, economically speaking?

Great question, what has the UK done even for itself?

​@@Somerled_Poxa lot, if by for itself you mean the rich

we make lots of money, you just don’t see any of it. the western world collectively demonised anything leftist, now enjoy your capitalism 😂

Sunctions?

Installed two clowns to lead us, Sunak and Hunt 🤡 🤡

That 265 will get better returns if invested in a standard ETF. Why is it the government's business to take control of our retirement plans. Reform is needed

Same problem in the Anglo world, most of the mo EU goes to the old and sick, no investment in the young. The boomer generation has abandoned their children, we are on our own.

@@hidir3532 The government tried to reform the national retirement plan before the pandemic, more than 80% of the population were against. The majority of french people are financially uneducated, even those who are considered rich are vastly ignorants in this matter.

So basically another Japan's case in EU.

​@@ThomasHldvBecause the people instinctively know a change being led by Jupiterian Macron can't be good for them. And they are right.

Or she could get her act together for once and leave the eu zone like she use to promise. It won't reduce their debt but it will help Italy having a higher gdp growth and reduce unemployement. It will also give the option to the Italian state to cancel part of their debt (which will probably enrage the other eu member if they decide to do but it is what it is).

Italy needs Milei. The world needs Milei

Selling off government owned enterprises is a start. But it cuts revenue from those ventures.

@@nono114499 leave EU to do what ? Italy is not UK, we have a big debt towards european banks and they give it on really low interest rates too.... if we leave EU it will be over, caput, end of country... my university teacher told us that once we leave, we will need 100 years to return to how we are today, because of all bankruptcies and devaluation of money, because of course we will get back LIRA... it's too late to leave, we should've never gone in tho... big difference.

​@@nono114499 Higher gdp how ? it will get lower because of all the bankruptcies, it will be a bank run, many of which will close.... Unemployment will skyrocket, no one wants to work in a failed state, many industries will close, if not for that then they will close because of banks collapse... How can Italy have the possibility to cancel half of their debts ? If they try to do it, no one will even give money to Italy, at least from western world, but even countries like Russia, India, China will give money but on a much higher rates compared to EU countries... also no external Bank will want to have anything to do with Italy... Banks are extremely important, we almost had a bank run in 2017 but it got saved with government investment... Sometimes I wonder if you people have finished an economy or political school before writing such bs...

He's french pronunciation is perfect, he probably is, at least partially. A french speaking economics pragmatically definitely needs to be a wizard

😂 from their point the whole world is collapsing because every wealthy country is suffering from the same problems to varying degrees. I’m from Portugal is like people saying Brazilians are taking us over but they forget that “There is a people in the far reaches of Iberia who neither govern themselves nor allow themselves to be governed” we kicked out the moors,jews,spaniards😂

@@santostv. hey, Spaniards are brothers. 😤

@@danielefabbro822 They are nuestros hermanos now but 500 years ago they weren’t.

@@santostv. we all had our precedents, that will never delete our commond blood. Hermanos fino a la muerte.

@@danielefabbro822 Correct 👍 my Italian cousin

Were you read that productivity has decreased? Everything i read says the opposite. I’m from Portugal the old people only have houses because of inheritance and foreigners money (Germany,uk) they payed high interest rates for it. The 08s did a number on us and they chose f austerity to solve that imo was a mistake, here the country is badly runned,corrupt and business are known to have influence over them, about housing because again 08s barely new houses were built leading to low supply and with a aging population I guess it made sense but them they are the brilhant idea of tourism so demand for short term housing increased then oops this is working but wait nobody wants to work this sh&tty jobs, new brilliant idea migrants but wait we pay badly and no one wants to come another genius idea appears free eu passport guys it works results more demand for housing that nobody has been building since 08s, politicians damm my houses were work 500 thousand now they are worth 1,4 million we can’t go easy on bureaucracy for new houses, real estate developers damm the government solutions worked look at those expats from usa/uk ect we can get they money, nice so they earn three times more so why not build luxury houses that they can easily afford and think is cheap muahh end of history 😂

Productivity went up for a long time, in large part due to computers. Wages did not keep pace, and the difference mostly went to the rich. As for housing, it has a lot to do with land costs driven by a liberal mortgage system with low interest rates. In the 80s, it was typical to buy a house for quite cheap, but monthly payments would be similar to now due to high interest rates of approx. 20%. This is much more feasible for most than the current system, with similar payments but now you need to have a large down payment as well. It was well intentioned, but in practice a disaster.

Productivity loss is a bogus argument indeed. It only became an argument when the owners of capital decided that the share of income going to employees needed to be reduced.

@@pritapp788 that's the same feeling I have

@@windhoek_stallion8455 but why is being lazy a problem? I can understand people living in a state of emergency (wars, natural disasters, poverty) working their asses off to try solving urgent problems but, considering the technological achievements of the last 30 years, we should be able to work less and do more than 30 years ago. How come we work more and get less? Consider also that the only real emergency we are facing is global warming, which would definitely benefit from people doing less and relax more (unless doing means actually workomg your ass off to try finding a solution that is yet missing)

Socialism

Business incentives aren't lacking that's for sure. But the BIG problem is the enormous, fragmented and bloated technocratic bureaucracy. So much delays, so much money wasted. The tax structure is outdated as well. Still on work and production. We really really need to shift it on consumption like Nordic countries. This way, cost of labor will go down and businesses will be able to grow.

​@@visitante-pc5zcunfortunately for you, it's not socialism

italy is a shitty, terrorist state.

CFA bullshit.

From memory, the U.K. is the only country to repay its post-WW2 debt to the USA.

@@gaynormca8992 No France finished to pay it in the 70s. You can easy google it.

@@gaynormca8992 Ah no. The UK did not repay its WWI debts or WWII debts to America because it omitted interest, which meant that inflation did most of the work. Australia is the only country to pay both world war debts, with interest.

@@seanlander9321 I did say it was from memory and I was at least partly right! I never saw anything about the U.K. failing to pay interest. And well done the Aussies for repaying the full amount 🇦🇺

@@gaynormca8992 Britain also borrowed heavily from Canada at the outset of WWII and made the same repayments as the American loans, being interest free. Interestingly in WWI, Australia had run out of money by 1917 so borrowed £96.0M (half its GDP) from Britain which had borrowed it from America, and Britain was not paying for grain and wool until the war ended. After the war every country that had borrowed from Britain was given a discount, delayed payments, trade deals, or loans forgiven, except Australia which was singled out for repayment in full with a profit component of interest above the cost of the American sourced funds. To paraphrase the Hansard record; the Australians needed to be taught a lesson about fiscal responsibility. It took until 1936 to clear the debt and obviously that added to the difficulties of The Depression. The absolute dismissal of Australia continued to 1953 when the London Agreement concluded the terms for German WWI reparations on the condition that of all the Versailles signatories or successors, eg Ireland, Australia alone was not to receive any payment on its £426.0M owed. Britain eventually received half the WWI German reparations and interest with payments ending in 2010. The outstanding WWI loan though is the Churchill-Caillaux debt agreement where the French suspended repayments on £640.0M in 1931 after Parliament agreed a year’s grace. Not a penny paid by France to Treasury since then and the interest is 5%. The French claim that because Parliament hasn’t called on them to restart payments that they don’t have to. No parliamentarian since 1932 has tabled a motion for France to recommence payments on sovereign debt or to sell the Treasury bills securing the debt. So there you have it, for all Australia’s support for Britain in two world wars, the Brits gave better favour and closer allegiance to the French and the Germans.

his voters were already retired by the time they voted. In their mind, pushing the retirement age was a good move because the instability from revolt was only short term meanwhile going to the root cause of the problem could very much change how things run in the country, therefore putting their little vacation to a big rumble. Basically retirees across all europe want the least change possible to the social system because they benefit the most, plus they are boomers so they are stuborn and egotistical (especially in France, honestly thinking about how to better society is an Asian / Protestant thing to do, which France is none)

As stated, it’s not his voter base, because they are all retired or soon-to be, and the retirement age is increasing by 3 months per year. So people that were expected to retire in 2 years for example will only have to work 6 additional months. I’m not fond of this reform, because in essence, it continues to make newer generations pay for it. It guarantees current retirees the same great benefits they have always enjoyed despite retiring earlier and paying fewer social security contributions in the past (there were fewer retirees back then), while the newer generations have to pay this huge amount of taxes at the moment, work longer and will also have lower pensions because pension growth has been regularly frozen by the government, and this will have a compounding effect over the years… All in all, a not so courageous reform, especially given the scale of the problem.

It should be linked to life expectancy like in my country and others and eu should create a suplementary private pension fund option.

​@@lutintarzanSo true. France is very much a Latin country with a Latin mentality, exactly like Italy, Spain, Romania and the French speaking part of Belgium ( the French Swiss are more " germanized" in a way )....

Cause we (atleast sweden) have centralised the same way many other countries have, unless u live in a big city you wont find a job. And its exoensive and u need a degree for everything

Mine is 7th and France is 6th it could be better but I don’t think it’s that bad ,in 2013 my country had 17% unemployment rate, also 0% unemployment rate isn’t good either. In my country most live by the coast is were most jobs are.

Private pensions are not politically appealing in France, which makes sense since it has the same flaws as insurance: the rich get the most advantages for a lower price/quality ratio while the poor may not even get anything because they prefer/need to spend their smaller amount of money on other things. In fact, quite extensive insurance is mandatory for homes, vehicles and a few other things in France. Meanwhile, public insurance is also considered as safer.

There are plenty of issues with having a primarily private pension system. Most of the money goes into real estate (Renting properties out to workers) Much like French taxpayers we are also funding pensioner's retirements. For us it is through rents as a proportion of income as opposed to taxes.

In my country housing is their retirement insurance that allows to live a ok life with a low pension but because life expectancy increased there more old people and even with low pension is too much we have 180 old people for 100 young people and some people are getting retirement without ever putting in it because in the old days were possible, others their retirement was calculated based on the 10 years they earned the most, also because they live longer despite most owning their houses it takes longer for family to get their inheritance,although a awful thought if they died early a lot of young people would get a house or money from the sales of the house for a downpayment ect. We need pension reform and a private pension scheme in the eu but because in countries like mine most people are financial illiterate it would need some guidelines, technically we have them it’s called ppr but some don’t even make almost any money. To estimulate the economy and compete with the USA we also need a eu stock market but eu countries would need to give up “sovereignty”

EU, USA and China as well. Modern economic growth is being based on debt, which carries its own risks.

usa is doing fine. its eu which is exploding

Debt is good if controlled ,better than austerity I talk from experience. USA debt isn’t a problem despite what Americans say because the usa has the biggest military and still are the world reserve currency. In the eu we got railed by 08s financial crisis and they chosed austerity and we let the USA take the lead from some reason, Germany loves money so they didn’t invest it and now are seen the consequences of it.

@@santostv. Of course debt is good, until you can't pay it and run out of money, ruining the country's future. Debt has literally make us fall into the worst inflationary crisis of the last 50 years

@@Almirante1741 it’s would be worse if they used the other option instead of having low employment you would have high unemployment. A country that doesn’t invest gets left behind off you need something to back off that debt or investors run away.

At least Italy and Spain don't have to spend billions in expensive overseas territories ( French Guyana alone has the size of Austria, nearly the size of Portugal ) and military bases in West Africa

The EU doesn't care about france at all, its objective is to make a uniform europe that is as a whole developed, therefore it pours billions into eastern europe countries.

At a time when the USA is engaging in massive "stimulus" (i.e. debt and money printing) to boost its domestic market and local industry, financial stability rules risk putting the EU perpetually behind. It's not an easy decision to make - it might be much easier if others like Japan and the USA were not simultaneously resorting to ever more debt and deficit spending. The allowed deficit according to the EC's rules is 3% of GDP, while the US is running deficits of 6-7% of GDP. Twice as high, with the numbers being in trillions - not 1000s.

@@pritapp788 I agree with you that there are no difficult decisions to be made. Where we may disagree is that I prefer that those decisions are made by those who have skin in the game and not the government. France in particular has shown over the last 40 years how bad their government is at allocating the population's capital. What we can perhaps agree on is that it is about being marginally smarter? Because others make less wise decisions is not an excuse to follow suit.

The future generations won't be European, and that's good.

That's unfortunatelly not only a problem of those Western nations, there are many problems in today's world that could be fixed very quickly and we as a society don't have the will to change that.

@user-nw8zm2wu6o The money that countries are sending to Ukraine is irrelevant compared to the general budget of each other, with only very few exceptions. And military aid in form of money doesn't go to Ukraine, it goes to your own country, to military companies in your domestic borders.

Debt is good if used correctly, our problem (Eu)is old people, it isn’t debt,it isn’t taxes but old people and corruption. Only 20% is giving to Ukraine in cash to continue to run the government the rest is value old equipment costed and new equipment brought from usa and European companies including french one and is a small amount and even if was bigger is a necessary evil because Russia only respects strength and they can’t smell weakness. Since 08s the world has been effed but they could hide behind low interest rates environment now governments around the world can’t. Besides housing even with the increases you can still live ok but unfortunately there’s no political will to increase housing supply because politicians and their businessman friends are real estate investors.

Those do play their role in that. Macron cut taxes for the rich and big business... But the results show a failure to create more growth

You can't squeeze blood from a stone, everyone can't live off the rich.

If you increase taxes on the rich, they just end up leaving and you end up with less tax revenue and less growth due to decreased investment.

If you confiscated the wealth of all American billionaires, it would be 3 trillion dollars. The US spent 6.3 trillion in 2023 alone.

"Profit = 0" is only possible with capitalism based on perfectly competitive markets. Government regulation/intervention is what creates non-zero profits, often in an unexpected way.

@@Murmilone You are right. Forcing other countries (by army or corrupcy) to unequal exchange makes profit. But it is such a strange competitions - under bombs and gangs. Governments interventions - do you mean "borrowed" money? It is loss for country, but profit for businessmen. Plus + minus equals 0 again.

www.oecd.org/tax/revenue-statistics-germany.pdf At least data from 2022

Hey, interesting point on the 3% and its origin. I don't see however how that changes this story.That rule means that France (and Italy) will get in trouble for their deficits. But even without the deficit rule, France would have problems of deficits and public spending and the negative consequences linked to them. The only difference now is that there is a 'cop' that at least nominally has the power to punish countries for this (good or bad). Cheers, Hugo

@@IntoEurope I would enjoy you looking into debt in the EU general in the future. The fact is that government debt at a national level doesn't matter as long as it is issued in the governments own currency and the state has sovereignty over that currency. That's why Japan can get away with having such a ridiculous level of debt and functionally still be more or less like any other developed country with an aging population. The difference for national governments in the EU is of course that they don't have sovereignty over the currency, the EU does. This essentially ties the hands of European governments, as we know there is a massive investment backlog in multiple things the EU needs, and national governments are at a point where they can't really take on more debt without violating their own rules, even though they wouldn't really harm anyone nor themselves by taking on that debt. It seems to me that the EU should seriously consider making debt a collective issue over the coming decade, if we ant to stem the tide of an aging population and climate change we need the monetary power of the ECB.

@@michelangelobuonarroti4958 "It seems to me that the EU should seriously consider making debt a collective issue over the coming decade" I don't think this is a good idea in the current situation. The EU is too inflexible especially with its voting rules. ( unanimity principle ) I imagine it would go like this. EU : We want a fund of 10 trillion euro to fight climate change. Some of the countries : Yeah sure BUT only if I get ....

The problem is the structure of the Euro. Financial operations should be highly technical things that just exist to support governments investments in real stuff (education, infrastructure, etc...) The Euro has elevated government deficits/debt into being a target, rather than a means to an end. That's the mistake.

You know that Germany is in a economic recesion I prefer having 40% of tax then to having to pay 0,70cents the kilowatt

Asia does not seem to be much better. just look at China now

@@httm241 China is having a recession, but if you average the last 10 years they've still got a solid 5% growth rate per year. Europe, on the other hand, is averaging barely above zero. Japan is probably a better comparison, they have a similar average growth rate to Europe.

@@domtweed7323 China’s real estate sector is a massive time bomb

Well said. And brits are now so f...d! Since Thatcher they haven't reclaimed their water resources yet, this lunatic privatised even water. So today the river thames is owned by "investors" from Kuwait. No surprise there's so much shit floating there

Because Nordic countries are actually very liberal to the creation of wealth, while France is the complete opposite. Taxes for companies are pretty low in Scandinavia.

​​​​@@diogorodrigues747They are more decentralised ,liberal and socialist. They have huge statistical datas where they like to keep abd use a lot for decades so it also ease things. They also do not have an energy crisis so their gdp didnt plummeted. But I disagree on taxes for companies being low they are not much different from france. Almost all corporate income tax in nordic countries fixed in %22 while France has %25. Although %3 makes a lot of difference it isnt much higher but do not let this fool you Nordic countries has a brutal tax system that prevents rich from getting too rich and poor from getting poorer.Thus keeping the balance between majority and rich therefore a more liberal and low corruption governments

@@exosproudmamabear558 I know very well that taxation in Scandinavia is high, that's why I said "companies" and not regular citizens.

@@diogorodrigues747 Dont talk about things you dont know much about. We have some of the highest taxes company-taxes in the world.

@@diogorodrigues747 Taxation in Scandinia is not just high it's the highest in the EU with Denmark.

As a Bulgarian, I find this bizarre. Doing business here requires a lot of connections to the right people. You also have a lot of headaches with the corruption and lack of institution to defend both workers and small businesses

Tu parles des taxes sur le salaire des gérants d'une entreprise pas des taxes sur les dividendes que tu peux toucher à la fin de l'année. Deplus il y a des avantages fiscales pour une SAS/SARL que tu n'as pas en tant qu'auto-entrepreneur. Il suffit juste d'avoir un comptable qui t'explique tout ça.

I bet you were doing something wrong because explain what the richest people in the world are still doing in Europe. What your business? Going to bulgary to do what? A austerity lifestyle because from my understanding Bulgaria compared to France is still poor.

@@santostv. Bulgaria is very poor and very corrupt - like the worst when it comes to these two categories in the EU, with Hungary under Orban deciding to race to the bottom for it.

@@Fruzhin5483 Nothing against Bulgaria,I’m from Portugal also a country with unfulfilled potential but the commentor wasn’t a successful businessman. Why change from a country with 67 million potential customers plus francophone countries to a country with 6 million population. Gdp France per capita: 40 886$ Gdp Bulgaria per capita: 13 974$ Gdp Portugal per capita:24 515$ Only poor people (for their country) and retirees downgrade.

People come to Europe for a better life, most are not on benefits. The problem is the bureaucrats that cannot be fired and don’t bring any value to the economy. And I am pretty sure that those account for a much bigger share of the costs that the population on benefits. However politicians would never rock that boat.

True

or revolution

terrorists.

Those who own the companies have to pay inheritance taxes. They then extracted dividends to pay back taxes thus canibalizing the companies. Cheers, Hugo

Why not cutting spending? Firing lazy public employees. There are loads of them

You must have read your payslips poorly darling. You have to factor, not only what you are paying, but what your company is paying the state as well. Because this is also part of your salary, except that it is captured on the company side. The state steal above 25% out of my pocket and 44% from my employer. That's 70% without counting, the tax on the oil, the electricity (taxed twice, because why not), all the goods, etc... I am sorry my dear, but even paying 15K for healthcare while saving 10k in options / gold would actually make us richer than what we have right now. Spoiler, the poor aren't doing any better. They are actually worse, since they're the very first victims of inflation which is the root of any socialist country. Oh yeah, inflation has been there since way before ECB 2010 scam, just saying.

@@foxoon9389 I don't understand the need for patronizing, but yeah.

I'll give you some idea on my payment slip. Out of my 2023 revenue: If I see how much net income I received vs the total expenditure from my employer I was taxed at an average of 54%.... This includes social security, health, education, house tax (tax fancier) on my principal residence, and does not take into account VAT contributions which is big part of the total taxation from the economy. I totally agreee on the fact that in this country it is very difficult to get rich by working which as a highly skilled engineer in a lucrative sector I find particularly frustrating. FYI I'm an expat. Observing the social unrest this summer with people burning downtown and breaking stuff once every 2 months in the public space, things that actually I will have to pay for through taxes I am wondering what the fuck I still do in this country.

Taxes on labour income in France is top 4 in the OECD, with an average of 47% of a worker's wage being taxed. You need to include not just income tax, but employer + employee side social security contributions. Employer-side social security contributions are "hidden" in that they are taken out of wages before they're given out, but they absolutely affect your disposable income. If a country were to set a 50% tax on wages but purely on the employer side with 0% employee side taxes, according to you workers there would have 0% taxes. But they would be wondering why they are being paid half of what their labour should be worth.

Yes we have one of the highest one in all the EU/Europe (1.7). It decreased a little bit but most experts are saying it's because of the aftermath of covid so we will need to wait a few years before being able to truly say that it's decreasing (it was 1.8/1.9 before)

Because of non-Europeans

French soil born women have a reproductive rate of 1.7. First gen immigrant women (born outside of France) have 2.2, with 3.3 for sub saharan african women and 2.4 for maghreb women. So you get whatever conclusion you want lol. Source Insee Immigrés et descendants d'immigrés Édition 2023

@@lutintarzan Cool, remember the people of Guianne have been French far longer than the people of Nice and Savoie

@@lutintarzan If you have a french passeport you are french we don't care about "soil born women". It's our republican values if you don't like it it isn't my problem...

This mentality is why europe is behind.

What we need is to abolish the modern state and its addition of spending others people money. Abolish income tax and the welfare state and return to the 1900s funding model which indeed included some form of wealth and estate taxes.

That wouldn’t solve anything most rich people have money in the stock market, even if you got all their money it would not be enough.

Hi, Do you have any examples of people that do it better that you would suggest emulating? Cheers, Hugo

@@IntoEurope I mean I suppose most clear sounding producers. Anybody who doesn't treat each sentence as a standalone message and where the talking sounds a bit more natural. Adam Neely is the next video in my recommendation list right now. He's not bad I guess?

it’ll all even out when they let Ukraine into the EU 😆

If Greece goes bust it's Greece's problem if France goes bust it's the ECBs problem.

Because they are big , just like the usa can afford having high debts, it’s not double standards because if Germany and France fall we all fall.

The EU doesn't have control over countries, especially countries that give more money than they receive. Therefore they have no obligation.

@@luxraider5384 ????? They literally have control over certain things, to join the eu you give up a part of your sovereignty. Just don't comment if you are fucking clueless please.

socialists believe that they have the right to steal bernard arnault money. So they will never give up on their privileges.

ok boomer