Yeah, pretty crazy. The most crazy transversals I have seen are 4907 (0.6 second jump-climb, although it takes a while to charge up) and 2046 (3 second normal climb).

@@Bholla64A9 the jump is very fast yes, but they need to take time to charge it and line up. When I was at the waterloo competition we were wondering why they didnt charge the jump at the start of the match so they didnt have to wait 10 seconds underneath the hanger. Turns out they are not allowed to have it pre charged due to safety and it could possibly blow up or pop somehow and badly damage the robot if it is hit by another bot or drove into a wall

@@ranceroni Have you seen 696’s 2.5second traversal climb though kzfaq.infoGyyaW7HWCaY?feature=share

@@daniellush7773 yes i should have clarified that, you're right

You should see 2046's 2.5 second traversal

That's exactly what you can expect from 254 and 1678.

Another bot pushed our breaker with their intake and disabled us. Not intentional at all, though it is annoying being disabled for a match.

@@James-zc4gq If that's true and they disabled your robot by turning it off with the button, that would have been a red card according to G205, even if it was accidental. I still don't think it should be a red card though. 5458 pushed you into 254's intake 🤷‍♂

@@NeilTheFisher Because the contact was initiated by 5458 and 254 was the bot that flipped the breaker G205 was not broken. G205 applies when a robot initiates contact, regardless of intention. A red card would not and should not apply here.

I watched the replay of that match, but there are something wrong about the score in that match

They are from my city, fun fact, i know these guys and they LITERALLY finished their robot like a month before the competition, sadly, we all here know they do get a lot of help from their mentors and they do have good sponsors that give them quality material, when the rest of the teams have to work their way out in it.

Parents aren’t the ones building the super high level bots, it’s normally mentors and tons of funding, (mentors being professional engineers that “help” students design) and funding that allows for teams to buy kits for difficult to design parts (like swerve drives)

@@alexboniske4035 yea, it’s true, if you’re basically funded by NASA and you have good design, then it’s basically just easy win at that point.

Hey, that's not gracious professionalism ;)

I don't think you're the only one actually, but for those who are confused, this is the current world record match for competitive robotics this year (the program's called FIRST if you're curious)