Froude Number - Why Georgia and H4 are Memes

No video

Froude Number - Why Georgia and H4 are Memes

Рет қаралды 32,286

Күн бұрын

Play some World of Warships, learn some naval architecture :D Enjoy!
♥ Connect with me ♥
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / ichasegaming
Facebook: / ichasegaming
Twitter: / ichasegaming
♦ Become my Patron at / ichasegaming ♦
To contact me via e-mail send it to chasegamingtv@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 336

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

It should be noted that I have simplified some of the concepts to make it a bit more digestible :) realistically speaking when talking about Froude numbers, we should be talking about the number of transverse waves along the length of the ship's hull and also the subsequent interaction between bow and stern waves in terms of amplification and nullification but then it would just vastly go beyond the scope of what this video wanted to do. Which is to have some fun with WoWS while introducing some small bits of naval architecture. Let me know what you all think though :D I hope you enjoyed something a bit different.

@CoffeeMug2828 3 жыл бұрын

well... wargaming was never reasonable to begin with. I mean look at the shell mechanics. how can a single millimeter of armor make such a huge difference. the caliber rule isn't even realistic to begin with. so of course speed and powerplant as well.

@yayeet7274 3 жыл бұрын

Chase what’s your profession, if u may ask. I removed something about teaching, right? Which class is your specialty?

@Sotha42 3 жыл бұрын

Really liked the video and would appreciate more videos like this. For me, you could even go a bit more into the details of the science behind it.

@charliedontsurf334 3 жыл бұрын

He is in school for ship engineering. Not sure exactly what though.

@BayushiTawa 3 жыл бұрын

More of this please! And Happy New Year :-)

@metwo1492 3 жыл бұрын

iChase: H4, you're violating the laws of physics. H4: Fortunately, I've never studied law.

@SDZ675 3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the part where the French ship's captains break out a German whip and the entire gunnery crew reloads twice as fast.

@chriswilliams-dm9tx 3 жыл бұрын

While also adding some champagne to the fuel oil to get that speed boost!

@andreasmuller4666 3 жыл бұрын

Do you mean a riding crop?

@franks471 3 жыл бұрын

very unsafe munitions handling practices. That's how they get the reload boost. ;)

@SDZ675 3 жыл бұрын

@@franks471 Only need to raise 1 flag to stop the magazine detonations though. Wonder why the British didn't do that in Jutland.

@ryanc5195 3 жыл бұрын

@@franks471 The british should be the ones getting the reload boast since they were the ones stacking cordite in turrets at Jutland....

@foysalsiddik6897 3 жыл бұрын

I will love to see some Soviet ship engineering breakdown. 😊

@toveychurchill6468 3 жыл бұрын

Should it work in the first place

@SDZ675 3 жыл бұрын

They use special Stalinium metals and Stalin himself does the fire control for the guns.

@auo2365 3 жыл бұрын

The kremlin would destroy itself every time it fired its guns in a salvo

@xsouldriverx 3 жыл бұрын

Or how they stop and accelerate on a dime

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Ooh yeah, I'm getting to those ships too. Do need more classes on ship stability and such :) but they'll drop eventually

@ayayip3708 3 жыл бұрын

WG: "WE RECREATE SHIPS ACCURATELY ACCORDING TO THEIR HISTORICAL BLUEPRINTS."

@Kompressor2007 3 жыл бұрын

well... that's kinda true... the shape is done accordingly to their historical blueprints haha (if available haha)

@crazyr0m 3 жыл бұрын

That is true, the ship is according to blueprints, so the ship is recreated ok. The boost is just a game thing heheh

@MohdArif-pl3sy 3 жыл бұрын

Somewhat true, whether it pass is another matter.

@xavierxza1237 3 жыл бұрын

@@Kompressor2007 laugh in german 3x4 mainbatt config

@diegoviniciomejiaquesada4754 3 жыл бұрын

That one always makes me laughs.

@alessiobubbles5345 3 жыл бұрын

From an architectural standpoint, the Soviet low freeboard on the Kremlin is HILARIOUS. one wave and everybody on board gets wet😂

@amadeokomnenus1414 3 жыл бұрын

I was posted to coastal patrol boats, that had a higher freeboard. The Pav is quite rediculous

@aurelian3268 3 жыл бұрын

only Soyuz has a gigantic freeboard in the line and can you guess why? those things were actually being built

@alessiobubbles5345 3 жыл бұрын

@@aurelian3268 exactly, you can instantly tell glorious Soviet paper Ships by looking at their freeboard and stability The Petropavlovsk has less freeboard than a Gearing...

@aurelian3268 3 жыл бұрын

@@alessiobubbles5345 physics is capitalist propaganda comrade. soviet ships float just by sheer will of the people

@amadeokomnenus1414 3 жыл бұрын

@@aurelian3268 Soyuz never left the docks it was being built at in Nikolaeyev. Im pretty sure they only managed the keel, lower hull and not much else. Just testing my memory. Ill google it soon

@IconProduction01 3 жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure none of us ever expected ship's having a speed boost in WoWS to be a scientifically sound or accurate aspect of this game lol. Realism has never really been a big concern of this arcade game between Holland's WWII era torps that are somehow able to travel at 90 knots underwater, Kremlin's 457mm main battery turrets being able to rotate nearly twice as fast as Yamato's 460mm turrets, or something like Conqueror being able to completely repair almost all battle damage multiple times over per engagement. Also, various destroyer caliber guns being able to reach 11km+ when on a DD hull, yet those same turrets can only reach 5-6km when slapped onto the deck of a battleship in this game... With all this in mind though, I must say I was utterly shocked just now to hear that the engine boost consumable isn't actually physically possible...

@SteinbergerGPPRo 3 жыл бұрын

Japanese Type 95 torpedoes can do 91 knots. The Halland is also a post war design, so it's not that ridiculous.

@alganhar1 3 жыл бұрын

@@SteinbergerGPPRo Yes... and no..... The maximum speed of the torpedos came at the cost of range, because like ships they have a limited internal fuel load, and like ships their range is affected by their speed, also like ships they have a maximum range dictated by their 'cruising' speed, i.e. the speed at which they are most efficiently running. Most warships of the WWII era for example were designed with a cruising speed of around 15 knots. Torpedo's could be set to run at a series of speeds, but go above that cruising speed and you begin to lose range. So while it MAY have been possible for a Type 95 to reach the speeds you claim, it is NOT going to retain the huge maximum range the type is famous for at that maximum speed. In fact that range is going to drop HARD once you start running the weapon at those kinds of speeds. You are likly going to get maybe a kilometre out of that kind of torpedo at 90 some Knots....

@Shadow-sq2yj 3 жыл бұрын

I never thought about the DD guns on BBs being twice as short ranged.

@IconProduction01 3 жыл бұрын

@@Shadow-sq2yj Yea, when I first started playing this game years ago and learning more about naval war ships and their construction etc., I started noticing how many times the naval designers from all the various nations tended to share guns and other bits and pieces between ships of different classes. One quick example was two of Mogami's triple 152mm turrets being reused after Mogami's main battery was upgraded to 203mms, so the IJN took the spare 152mms and mounted two of them as part of Yamato's secondary battery where they can be seen fore and aft just behind the main 460mm turrets. So, this sharing of the same naval gun between ships of different classes is especially apparent with the number of times various BB secondaries double as the main gun battery for a nation's destroyers. You'll see Haragumo turrets used many times in the secondary batteries of BBs like Yamato, Shikishima, etc. and I believe Gearing's main battery guns are the same as what's used in the secondary battery of many of the US BBs and the Midway too I believe. So yea, it struck me as pretty stupid and kind of frustrating that literally a copy paste of the same guns featured on a particular nation's DDs can suddenly only reach 5-6km max when mounted on a BB in this game... Obviously it kind of needed to be done for balancing purposes, but still, it's kind of stupid that literally the exact same gun will have drastically nerfed range and sometimes also different fire chances and reload rates just by them being on the side of a BB rather than used as the main battery on a DD hull..

@aleksei5172 3 жыл бұрын

Gun range for most ships in WoWS has nothing to do with the reality. For example, in-game main gun range of Warspite is about 16.3km. But in reality she holds a record of a successfull shot at 24km distance. Mikhail Kutuzov's main gun range is 30km, secondary range - 23km - mostly because it's post-WWII design

@andreasmuller4666 3 жыл бұрын

Honestly, this was both educational and highly entertaining. More in this style please. (definetly better than just "they nerfed this and that" and "that doesn´t work or balanced" type of vid 1 mil)

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Yup, more of these types of videos in the future. It is after all the stuff I'm studying so might as well turn them into videos

@knightaaron7 3 жыл бұрын

@@ichasegaming awesome always learning

@AdamSmith-kq6ys 3 жыл бұрын

Henri IV cruiser: You can't torpedo me if I'm planing!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

hahahaha, basically right?

@taramallison 3 жыл бұрын

I have a BS in Marine Engineering from the US Naval Academy...my discipline is responsible for designing the power plants that push the hulls designed by our sister shipbuilding discipline, Naval Architecture. It was delightful to watch a video that discussed the actual engineering behind ship design! Bravo Zulu. (The Academy has a very nice tow tank.)

@user-qt5xh9mt7x 3 жыл бұрын

you will never be a real woman

@taramallison 3 жыл бұрын

@@user-qt5xh9mt7x ...you’ll never be a real man... 😂🖕🏼

@RedSky1895 3 жыл бұрын

The only thing I'd like to add here is that the feasibility of exceeding efficient hull speeds is largely down to a matter of scale. The reason there were cruisers built that handily surpassed battleship powerplants in smaller size is that the boiler technology of the day simply allowed for it. Size and space mattered and there are of course diminishing returns in packaging just as well as in the exponential power required, allowing smaller vessels to more easily overcome these limitations for their roles. In your Georgia example, you list 1.41 and S/L of 1.39. Note that those values were identical to those of Mogami, a real ship that was actually built and operated. There is nothing physically impossible or even improbable about making such a thing even at the larger scale. The unrealistic aspect of it is that it's still an Iowa hull with seemingly little modification. It doesn't break through the barriers of reality, it breaks the budget and for no appreciable gain in a real naval doctrine that doesn't consist of a bunch of casuals zipping around the map randomly. Strategically, that much speed would have been useless. 33kts was already fast enough to A) keep up with fleet carriers and B) run down anything it would be called upon to engage. I'm not defending the choice (or admonishing it, from a gameplay perspective - I love Georgia!), nor criticizing this portrayal of the science (admittedly simplified to a reasonable level for a short video), but the context is still important to have a complete picture.

@VRichardsn 3 жыл бұрын

_The reason there were cruisers built that handily surpassed battleship powerplants in smaller size is that the boiler technology of the day simply allowed for it_ Debatable. Look at Mogami.

@wanyinchu8321 3 жыл бұрын

WG: Don't let your memes be dreams XD

@fabrifornasiero 3 жыл бұрын

Fun fact from an aircraft engineer, there is a similarity between Freude number and Mach number. In the early days, the surface of pools were used to simulate the way a supersonic boom is created

@Hahlen 3 жыл бұрын

You mentioned the performance of WWII destroyers a few times, I’d love a video on those. ( and the ridiculous speeds achieved by French and Russian destroyers in game )

@TanksExplosionsAnime 3 жыл бұрын

same, I'm really curious behind the engineering of these smaller vessels

@judiciasxaegis 3 жыл бұрын

Watching this after continously getting crap teammates in game made me chuckle Informative while being hilarious at the same time

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Awesome, glad you enjoyed it. Also, see math is more fun than WoWs ;)

@DirectorBird 3 жыл бұрын

@@ichasegaming For the last week and a half I've had nothing but blowouts. Win or lose. It's annoying. Also, stop making fun of my Georgia. Heretic.

@old_guard2431 3 жыл бұрын

I wish you luck in your new chosen profession, and it is good to see you are having fun with it. About half-way through my U.S. Coast Guard career as a marine engineer I realized it was no longer a civilian profession (the U.S. merchant marine having imploded) and went to law school. Don't know how it is in Canada, but I suspect the market for naval architects is limited. . . But you can always teach - you are pretty good at it.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! I'm definitely enjoying the subject matter so that's always going to be a win.

@genericcitizen6232 3 жыл бұрын

I have been to the Fluid Dynamics lab at MIT. It was like the black and white photo in your vid. pretty cool to see and it was HUGE ! Nice Vid to start the New Year with :)

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Cheers :D happy you enjoyed the video

@spacedreamer9055 3 жыл бұрын

Nicely done Chase!. Puts my experience on the then Hr. Ms. Evertsen in a new light. The Dutch Navy tried to recruit technical people after they graduated. One of the things they did was a day out on one of the Dutch Frigates. At sea, the captain cranked her open en before we knew it, the stern seemed to dip below the sealevel. It felt like an oversized speedboat - awesome - at the time. Your explanation helped to understand what I experienced on that frigate that day. Thanks and keep it up! And it doesn't diminish the awe and power you felt as the ship went as fast as she could. :-D

@zhaviator 3 жыл бұрын

On a side note, this is also why modern warships don't really go for speed anymore, since you can't dodge missiles with a few more kts anyway, instead of 33-35 kts you slow them down to 30, in some cases 27 kts saves a lot of space; weight and money on their propulsion

@imjashingyou3461 3 жыл бұрын

Its not about dodging missles so much as it used to be about closing in on an enemy or running away when they suddenly entered visual range. Since visual range isn't a thing anymore and missles have much longer range an extra 3 knots won't allow you to break or force engagement faster.

@Monty_BeGoodToEachOther 3 жыл бұрын

The in-game ship realism part of your video enlightening, but I most want to thank you for the lessons on ship design, testing, construction aspect of the video. Happy New year, from lairdmonty.

@4j_2905 3 жыл бұрын

Happy new year, you beautiful people!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Happy new year!!

@jefftuckercfii 3 жыл бұрын

Loved it. BTW, a Nimitz class carrier only has two reactors. This gets it over 30 kts. The Henri IV would need seven of those reactors as you said to make it's boosted top speed of 43.8 kts.

@jacksonuitenbroek236 3 жыл бұрын

Enterprise: "laughs in 8 reactors"

@roys.1889 3 жыл бұрын

Now here's another question related to all of this: What sort of powerplants could actually generate the kind of energy required for those ships to do the things they do? Then you have to factor in power to weight ratios, fuel efficiency, and all sorts of other stuff. Long story short, boat building more complicated than just making stuff float in water

@northernzeus768 3 жыл бұрын

The first thing I did in 2021 was learn about Froude numbers...🤪 Great video sir. Keep up the good work.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Awesome! Thanks for watching and definitely making more of these types of videos in the future

@lukestables708 3 жыл бұрын

Very interesting thanks, and I learned a new word/concept (cavitation). Yeah not sure how I stand on this but I guess it would be best if things were more or less realistically feasable. Of course the elephant in the room is the way that planes in wows are able to speed up and spin around in the air, which verges on the absurd and well beyond the ludicriousness of even the Georgia and Henri IV. Anyway, thanks again!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it and learned something new!

@mikehenthorn1778 3 жыл бұрын

Happy New Year sir looking forward to more videos. Henry the 4th huh, maybe she gets that fast when she gets up on her hydrofoils. I love the calculations I learned about them as I do Viking re-enactment and the longboats versus the trading ships had a very different link to beam ratio. That stuff is important in fluid dynamics. And your wave function diagram brought back the video I saw about the hood taking a magazine head where the wave dip well below her waterline.

@MurasakiOkami 3 жыл бұрын

Loved it xD that was a fun one xD "it would make Tchernobyl look like a pic-nic" xD

@Susie_Legion_DBD 3 жыл бұрын

"The ones that are real." Ah so not the Soviets then?

@owenilagan144 3 жыл бұрын

Speed boost is apparently an invisible disposable rocket engine strapped to the sides of these ships which is why they only have a limited number and have long cool down. :)

@ekder782 3 жыл бұрын

H4 Captain: Prepare ship for 35 knot max speed. Player: No, no, no, max speed is too slow. H4 Captain: max speed too slow? Player: Yes, we're gonna have to go right to ludicrous speed.

@slavkovalsky1671 3 жыл бұрын

Here's a quick solution: add hydrofoil as an option, and make speed booster ships displacement/hydrofoil hybrids (which I think most hydrofoil boats are, kind of - behaving like displacement ships at lower speeds). I know, I know, the largest hydrofoil craft IRL were well under 1,000 t.... So the required power for s 50,000-tonner like GA would still be out of this world. And hydrofoil would expose its unprotected bits when in use. Would help against torpedoes though, big time )))) Oh, and an excellent video, btw.

@etoeta 3 жыл бұрын

I really like this type of content. I also miss your streams a little bit but no problem, keep up the good work :D

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Glad you like them! Will drop as many as I can

@SallinKari 3 жыл бұрын

H4 speedboosts into the center of the enemy fleet. Gets hit by AP. H4: You fool... you've played right into my plan! *Explodes like a nuclear warhead and wipes out enemy fleet.*

@feanorn8409 3 жыл бұрын

Nice vid. I always thought that Georgias speed is completely nuts.

@Kevin-et5zs 3 жыл бұрын

That was one hoopy frood, who really knew where his towel was!

@xsouldriverx 3 жыл бұрын

I like the new technical overlook. I would love to see more.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Definitely, that's the current direction of the channel overall. Shifting to more technical yet also much more interesting topics

@IRC2005 3 жыл бұрын

I really enjoyed this video iChase, many thanks ... but then I did study Fluid Mechanics. It would be great if you followed on in another video with a discussion of how the (shorter) destroyers get away with breaking the displacement hull rules, planing, dolphin strikers at the bows and their effect on the wave system, RN slab shaped transom etc. - PLENTY of material that I think your subs might be interested in. Have a great 2021!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I will definitely make more videos and explore more topics. WW2 era destroyers are definitely on the list

@BayushiTawa 3 жыл бұрын

Froude and cavitation... Big words which could make some WG brains explode... Really enjoyed It!

@thevexengineer 3 жыл бұрын

i just took a fluid mechanics course last term and when I saw the words "Froude Number" on the thumbnail my heart skipped a beat tbh

@kevinreed-jones3179 3 жыл бұрын

Fantastically educative class. Thank you iChase.

@stevedownes5439 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent video. You should do a video on the effect of transom (flat) sterns next.

@old_guard2431 3 жыл бұрын

I also appreciate the calculations. I had figured that if you had every steam powerplant on the island of Manhattan feeding steam through magical unreeling high pressure steam lines to the Georgia it might just about do it, but I think I kind of low-balled it. Here is an exercise for your budding naval architectural mind - could you do it with gas turbines powering generators and electrical motors for final drive? We have technology that has electrical super-cars putting thousands of horsepower down on the road with batteries and electrical motors. - just scale it up. Price is no object - paper is cheap, and so are paper ships. Gas turbines are very thirsty power plants, but remember that you only need fuel for twenty minutes of operation.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Don't even think a gas turbine, or multiple would be able to provide sufficient power. We're mostly talking future, anti-matter reactor technology here ;)

@ussxrequin 3 жыл бұрын

This was very interesting Chase, thank you for this content!

@pallegantzhorn3742 3 жыл бұрын

just wait untill they add hydroplanes lol, immune to torps

@rocketfishx3474 3 жыл бұрын

I mean in this game you can simply put a flag on and go faster. So defying the laws of physics is par for the course. I did enjoy this video and would definitely watch more technical videos about ship design. Congrats to you for transferring your game interest to your field of study

@imjashingyou3461 3 жыл бұрын

The flag reduces air drag. Didnt you know that?

@beware3586 3 жыл бұрын

Something else to note is that most ships did not fire while going full speed. The faster the ship went the less accurate the main battery guns became. Same with maneuvering.

@bullreeves1109 3 жыл бұрын

This was a pleasant surprise. You should make more vids like this.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Will do!

@rdfox76 3 жыл бұрын

Side note: Froude number also explains why destroyers *always* have horrible endurance; as small and short as they are, they're pretty much perpetually operating at inefficient Froude numbers, even at cruising speed.

@batrastardly4574 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, as a former electronics tech in the USN during the 70's I gave up on reality in WOWS a looong time ago. I especially like the radar and sonar punching through islands like they don't exist. Oh, and zipping around at flank speed and casual full turns all while in the middle of a cyclone is hilarious too. The ships look realistic and kudos for WG for that. Everything else is in arcade game mode and that's fine for what this game is.

@charliedontsurf334 3 жыл бұрын

Fascinating stuff. You should do a collaboration with Drachinifel. I think that could be fascinating. Also, can you do a similar video about buoyancy and stability of things like the Russian BBs?

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, definitely in my future plans :D

@jayvee8502 3 жыл бұрын

Yes. Russian BBs defy a lot of physics. We should look unto it. Like why Kremlin won't sink with that very low free board and it has tons of armor while smaller than a GK.

@stephenmarshall3771 3 жыл бұрын

Ooooo next can we talk about the magical reload booster that lets you reload 15 inch battleship guns in under 10 seconds????

@MohdArif-pl3sy 3 жыл бұрын

This is why real warships speed hover around 30 35 knot. Beyond that propulsion requirement become bit ridicilous.

@seraphis 3 жыл бұрын

Subbed. I don't play WoWs but I like the game from the outside. I just wanna see you make videos on the russian paper boats.

@gregmorrill4783 3 жыл бұрын

I lost it at "maybe make Chernobyl look like picnic, yeah?" lmao

@larrybomber83 3 жыл бұрын

Outstanding video. You answered a question I have had for decades. How do you decide how much shaft power do you need to power a ship in the water? And you answered it for me. Thank You so much!

@RobbertLobik 3 жыл бұрын

So the studies are paying off? :) Great job!

@robbie9723 3 жыл бұрын

Love this! Excited to see more content like it

@iftakharalam99 3 жыл бұрын

I think I seriously need to mention here, I am a Mechanical Engineering student and also play wows normally. I have a fluid mechanics exam after few days and right now i was reading Froude number on google drive sheet. I entered youtube and got froude number in here.I am totally surprised and also frightened. google is seriously tracking us.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY GOOGLE OVERLORD *if u don't say nice things about it................*

@foxymoronvideos3270 3 жыл бұрын

Oh, so *that's* why I have trouble hitting Henri IV: it's ignoring physics. Guess I'll have to try and grind for a Shimakaze and just torp it to death. Or get Kitakami and torp the whole freaking planet. There we go. You can't escape if I leave you with nowhere to escape to.

@chickenface3445 3 жыл бұрын

You are getting a sub for this video my good sir!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Welcome aboard!

@jakevanderveen9213 3 жыл бұрын

Well now I need to know about Champagne's Froude number cause that's a battleship that goes 35 knots by default before a speed boost.

@wote2760 2 жыл бұрын

Unironically learned more than in my actual college class on this

@meg_a_rexonblitz6344 3 жыл бұрын

Ah, you are wrong.The Georgia has rocket engines under water.

@USSEnterpriseA1701 3 жыл бұрын

Nah, she's secretly from the Fleet of Fog and is powered by gravity engines and can also submerge.

@0nkelD0kt0r 3 жыл бұрын

Well yeah, this strongly concludes that speed boost is a pure game mechanic like flags and captain skills, but the base stats are all quite reasonable. Though I have to note one very important thing: Froude numbers and Speed-Length ratios do NOT take hull shape and hull design features into account, which can massively improve a ships power efficiency if applied correctly. The most noticeable of those are bulbous bows and transom sterns.

@iqmalaidil3414 3 жыл бұрын

I love all of this geek speak. Make more like these, please!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Definitely, that's the current direction I'm heading in. More interesting and more technical subjects rather than just WG messed this or that up

@matteomazzei1724 3 жыл бұрын

Shall we talk about Kléber making *55,5 FREACKING KNOTS* Picture of a cruiser and picture of a destroyer Company needs you to find the difference between these two pictures *French Engineers* : they are the same picture

@tim1polman 3 жыл бұрын

Like the established proffessor of generic science, dr Jeremy Clarkson once said.. "Speed and power solves many things" 😂😅

@alexnevarez5024 3 жыл бұрын

finally I see some Naval Architecture in the game (I am still in process of being one)

@timash1927 3 жыл бұрын

Love this video! Please keep doing videos like this one!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Will do! More videos in my future plans

@toveychurchill6468 3 жыл бұрын

Student of physics peeking in :)

@chriswilliams-dm9tx 3 жыл бұрын

I like the science and realism concept it's interesting , but this is an arcade game not a simulator, so all this is out the window. Having said that, are CVs in the game as they are a valid unit in realism or should they be removed due to being so broken or what is the fix, limited planes?

@Lukos0036 3 жыл бұрын

It's quite simple really. See if you channel a matter/anti-matter reaction through a subspace reactive material like dilithium, it magnifies the distorting effect it has on space time effectively becoming a tiny black hole for the duration of the reaction who's gravity well can be molded and manipulated to move it and the vessel carrying it at physics defying speeds by simply reshaping the fabric of reality. Easy! How they manage this without warp plasma nacelles is beyond me, but they did call them the greatest generation for a reason.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Now that's what we're all missing, we're not in WoWs anymore, we somehow migrated to STO

@Lukos0036 3 жыл бұрын

@@ichasegaming I would take a Sovereign Class over a Iowa any day. XD

@AllAhabNoMoby 3 жыл бұрын

I checked my Georgia and confirmed my suspicion: she has planes, allowing her to be lifted out of the water at 35.6 knots and thereby achieving much higher speed at lower fuel consumption, and also requiring less power.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Georgia confirmed planing vessel

@victorfelix5718 3 жыл бұрын

I would like more of these kind of videos please And also happy new year to everyone

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Definitely, more videos like this will be made. Future direction of the channel anyways

@Daanlikkewaan 3 жыл бұрын

Really interesting video. Thanks Chase, keep 'em coming

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

You bet! More to come

@stalkingtiger777 3 жыл бұрын

You're forgetting that the speed boost activates the mass effect drives hidden in the bowels of the ship xD. Who doesn't love a BB that outruns my poor Hayate.

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Destroyers literally operate in an insane zone already...then along comes Georgia and H4...what is reality anymore XD

@-BigTMoney- 3 жыл бұрын

Bow shape , beam length and stern shape have a huge impact on how a ship preforms in water. You throw a rectangle in there with a concave bow with the same length as a ship you can get the same Froude Number but will need an exponent more power to hit the 20 knots. other things that need to be calculated for ship speed A* typical wave amplitude h* water depth g*=9.80665m/s2 acceleration due to gravity circular wave number S(x)=S*(x*)/(εh*2) submerged cross sectional area of ship at section x depth Froude number U* ship speed w* channel width horizontal coordinates ε=A*/h* smallness parameter for wave nonlinearity depth-averaged potential ζ=ζ*/(εh*) free surface elevation anyways do one on Reynolds Number

@ynge8046 3 жыл бұрын

the fastest cruiser of ww2 was the italian Scipio Africano of the Capitani Romani class. It broke 40 knts. It is represented in our game as the DD Paolo Emilio, as it was a small cruiser class....Id be curious to run that calculation.....and also how about torpedo speed?

@pendragooon 3 жыл бұрын

Cool video. An engineers pleasure ride.

@papabeanguy 3 жыл бұрын

really liked this video, you should make more like it

@gonotgone1 3 жыл бұрын

This was really interesting, now I need to know how Yamato’s bulbous bow affected her Fronde number

@diegoviniciomejiaquesada4754 3 жыл бұрын

MOGAMI - CLASS: STRONK!!! Man, I love my Mogami, in her 2 configurations: 10x20,3cm guns: Cruiser Hunter. 15x15,5cm guns: DD hunter.

@robdamanii 3 жыл бұрын

Was that a Tomorrow Never Dies reference there? "Make Chernobyl look like picnic...."

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Yes :D

@rockefeller63 3 жыл бұрын

Have you ever heard about SS United States? its was an ocean liner built in 1950 and 1951. It was 302m in lenght, with 53grt displacement. It went 44kn ....her engines produced 241k shp

@imjashingyou3461 3 жыл бұрын

Its hull form is vastly different then a warships.

@Seppe1106 3 жыл бұрын

That's why it's an arcade game, not a simulation. But fun facts there. :)

@madmike5421 3 жыл бұрын

Great Video, shows us exactly what the designers at WG are on when they make arbitrary changes to the game. Up in smoke like the game.

@jtojagicc 3 жыл бұрын

very cool video, very interesting and informative.

@IsKor06 3 жыл бұрын

Very educational video, thanks for making this one!

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it! Thanks for watching

@noahnicholay1736 3 жыл бұрын

Happy new year Ichase😀🤗

@ichasegaming 3 жыл бұрын

Happy New Year!

@hatsuzuki_9610 3 жыл бұрын

WG：good point lets make engine blowup mechanic system into the game that will be fun and engagging

@Eissen_meteor 3 жыл бұрын

Propeller Cavitation juuuust an imaginary thing.

@ohayou828 3 жыл бұрын

for some reason i really enjoy this video in spite of me expecting a wows guide from ichase

@g-low6365 3 жыл бұрын

your wrong... they used back to the future "presto logs" for the engine boost. doc brown gave them the top secret tech back then.

@cappytin1317 3 жыл бұрын

Great vid thank you Will you be doing any videos explaining why this game feels so "rigged" especially Naval Battles for clan resources, i can have great games one after another as long as i dont engage in naval battle but once that engage button is clicked....the match making worsens ie. Enter with T6 and every battle is T8 , unclick engagement and match making is crap but all a sudden T5 thru T6 in battle. I could go on example after example. Operations (enemy ships behave differently once there are 4 people in a division) together. So I and many others actually feel the game is saturated with systems designed against us completely?