Understand Fryette's three laws of motion and how to remember them. Tested on COMLEX. I will always keep my videos free. All I ask is that you like and subscribe. Much love, #medEASY
Пікірлер: 33
@antoncardinoza4337 Жыл бұрын
20 minutes discussion from my class was shortened to 5 mns thank you!
@asadnazim90016 жыл бұрын
great video, made things so much clearer!
@zorkachannel39233 жыл бұрын
I was so confused with the concept, thank you for clearing my doubt.
@zorkachannel39233 жыл бұрын
@Khalil Aydin literally I am not getting you
@markmaddock37915 жыл бұрын
Well explained, thanks!
@madmed5 жыл бұрын
mark maddock thank you so much! Glad u enjoyed it
@FattestKidEvvverr6 жыл бұрын
Excellent Video
@madmed6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment! Subscribe to the channel fam!
@alizaf67294 жыл бұрын
So in a flexed lumbar spine, Side Bending and Rotation to the same side is coupled movement?
@madmed4 жыл бұрын
Coupled just means one movement is associated with another movement. Your comment is an example
@josephcho34004 жыл бұрын
Can I ask you what kind of program are you using with showing anatomical features?
@madmed4 жыл бұрын
Complete anatomy!
@danielraygoza39335 ай бұрын
thx
@gjaliceliou2825 жыл бұрын
Question: For law 2 flexion and extension, do we still name the SD for where it likes to go (ex., FS(l)R(l) meaning the restriction of the vertebra eases while flexing, sidebending left and rotating left)? Thank you!
@madmed5 жыл бұрын
GJ Alice Liou great question. In general, things are typically named for where they like to be. Your example is correct. In a flexed, sidebent, rotated left diagnosis, as in your example, I would expect to find restriction while sidebending to the right or rotating to the right. Often it’s difficult to assess what is more restricted when we think about flexion and extension.. so a common practice is to monitor vertebral landmarks by palpating the extensions of the vertebral bony processes on both sides of one vertebral body and seeing if they are symmetrical or not (example if T6 feels symmetrical just to the left and right of midline posterior on T6 during flexion but not during extension, this would support your diagnosis that indeed the position of ease is flexion because the vertebral body/bony extensions are symmetrical). When it comes to rotating and sidebending, it’s easier to assess through motion, but remember if there are imbalances in flexion and extension as we discussed it means your diagnosis will have a flexion or extension component, therefore it must follow law 2, therefore rotation and sidebending should be restricted in the same direction. Hope this helps! Like, subscribe, and share if you appreciated this help! Much love
@gjaliceliou2825 жыл бұрын
@@madmed Thank you so much for the rapid reply and the thorough explanation. I am a first year med student in the DO program and your videos and replies are definitely very helpful. I have already subscribed to your channel and will recommend it to my classmates as well. I really appreciate you creating this channel and please continue to make more good videos like this.
@madmed5 жыл бұрын
@@gjaliceliou282 Thank you!! That means a lot! I think you present a great idea to continue with the OMM series.. stay tuned! Appreciate you sharing
@gjaliceliou2825 жыл бұрын
@@madmed Thank you very much for the reply, and yes I think more OMM tutorial videos would be great b/c I haven't found any online so far except yours. I have another quick question about Law 1 and 2: I know Law 1 usually involves multiple vertebrae while Law 2 involves single vertebra, but is this rule absolute? Can Neutral SD involve only 1 vertebra and F/E SD involve multiple vertebrae? Thank you!
@madmed5 жыл бұрын
@@gjaliceliou282 I think I will continue with OMM for sure, with the goal for you to learn and to prepare you well for the COMLEX.. for free. Law 1 is more absolute than Law 2. For example, you can have T4, T5, T6 happen to have somatic dysfunctions (could be the same, could be different dysfunctions) and still fall under Law 2. But if something is in multiple vertebrae in sequence and similar in dysfunction/position of ease, it's much more likely to be Law 1. Note the difference, while multiple vertebral levels MAY be Law 2, it is more LIKELY Law 1 (esp when it's the same dysfunction essentially).. also if you find only single vertebral dysfunctions then highly unusual for this to be Law 1.. while multiple vertebral levels MAY be Law 2, single vertebral levels are highly UNLIKELY to be Law 1.
@alaelyaman24844 жыл бұрын
What anatomy app do you use?
@madmed4 жыл бұрын
Complete anatomy
@joylangan4095 Жыл бұрын
What app is this?
@dnice44412 жыл бұрын
What 3D Anatomy software are you using?
@madmed2 жыл бұрын
Complete anatomy
@dnice44412 жыл бұрын
@@madmed Was it a pre-installed video on the app?
@andymai41504 жыл бұрын
I read in a kaltenborn book that extension will have sidebend left and rotation right? Which one is correct?
@madmed4 жыл бұрын
That would not be type two fryette laws, that would be type one. The video is correct - depends where u are in the spine
@andymai41504 жыл бұрын
@@madmed I was referring to the lower thoracic spine. I have read different studies stating different things. So for the lower thoracic spine, if the spine is in extension, would the coupled motion be rotation with contralateral rotation or rotation with ipsilateral rotation.
@madmed4 жыл бұрын
Andy Mai the thoracic spine behaves generally as type two mechanics if only one vertebral level is involved, although there can be times when a group of vertebral levels are involved which would follow type 1 motion