I think if Katie will tell the truth more likely her family will get hurt by Adelsons. Now Adelsons helps her kids with money for sure. And is so obvious Katie and Adelsons were involved.

Katy loves money more then her kids!!

Agreed pathetic mother

*care less

@@beautifulwaterfall222 From Wendi's Ex Boyfriend, Mr. Lacasse's testimony, it appears she appears to have tried to frame him. She knew he was going to be leaving town that Friday morning for a trip to Tennessee. But he left a day early. It looks like she wanted him to take the blame, deflecting it from her mom and brother. She is a piece of work.

So get that money and an education!

Wendi was smart enough to keep her hands clean. Wendi didn't pay her baby daddy and his best friend to murder someone. It ain't about wealth, education or privilege. They simply don't have the goods on Wendi.

@@beautifulwaterfall222 if she was involved? She was the one that made sure get gets killed !

Patiences Grasshopper. They work at the bottom chain links first and work their way up. The murders in the car first then the middle lady Katy. Charlie is arrested and will be found guilty soon then Wendi and her Mom next.

Beautiful Waterfall Could it be that the prosecution hopes one of these defendants will cooperate after they are found guilty. I thought it was interesting the prosecution had Wendi to testify that Charlie has a child. Must have upset the defendant as she was having an affair with him for quite a while.

They are NOT being charged because law enforcement screwed up thinking Katie was the liaison between that family and the contract killers. She is now stating in open court she believed the family IS behind the contract kill but she cant flip on them because she has no info to provide to flip on them. I cant see how everyone following this doesnt get it. IF she was involved she would have immunity and the family behind all this would be on trial.

Martella London She erased him out of the kids lives Her day is coming

Now is the time to get the girlfriend to talk. She going to hav another trail soon and she could easily get convicted. This trail gets hung. 10 to 2 in favor of guilty.

Rck Keller Do you know when her trial is?

It's not opinion, it's FACT- she openly admitted such to her (then) boyfriend Jeffrey Lacasse. Watch his testimony if you get a chance. It's pretty revolting...

Lisa Pully she’s lied about a lot which is purgery I don’t understand....

Wendi's testimony is she saw the crime tape & DID NOT go down Prescott .... another lie she told among the many ! Including lying to the Judge about spelling her nickname for her EX Jibbles because she had it in her phone spelled out but told the Judge she didn't know how to spell it ! Small lie but shows Wendi would lie about anything !

@@RKM-10 *perjury

If I had been that cop I would have said I didn't stop her because I figured if it had been his ex she would have inquired what was going on. After all her kids were with him that morning.

They are paid by the hour and will still represent in the retrial in October.

Exactly. Had Wendi not said she tried to go up Trescott. Butttttt. She might have escaped this sighting bc Officer Brannon wasn't giving a positive ID. Her shortcut story. Did you notice Garcia's attorney asking questions to help Wendi? Everyone's attorney trying to help Wendi...in every trial.

@@judyD.there’s a reason for it but still tbd

Evidence: connecting her by phone, text or in person communicating with Charlie or katie, or killers or Donna, immediately before after killing.

If arrested, she must be tried soon, and if evidence is weak she may get away with it and cannot be tried again.

Mr Magoo.

shaky

​@@SnickasBah ⬅️ RUDE, IGNORANT, AND INHUMANE

He put a quick stop to the BS line of questioning by that defense attorney regarding the fingerprint witness.

True. The two defense attorneys are just marking time asking foolish questions about Wendi's van that have no bearing whatsoever on their clients. Either they like the sound of their own voices or they like to be the center of attention. Ridiculous.

Something about this case os not right there is 99 percent of people think the Adelsons are guilty ( other 1 percent Pals of Adelsons.someone is getting paid off .too much coincidentes .kt will walk and what then where is the justice for Dans Family and Children.other clases have been won with less

Objection because probative as to why Katie replied “I know” over phone with Seigfried Garcia when informed “Done”. Candidly, I merely speculate.

I've noticed alot of protecting Wendi

Only person that knew Dan's schedule was Wendi, don't tell me she wasn't the master mind! She needs to be arrested now

99% chance Adelson are paying for her pricey attorneys. They are protecting the Adelsons.

@@maryperry1773what's your reservation on the 1%?

Why? It showed Dan going in and out, showed Rivera and Garcia driving around, Dan pulling out, and the 2 following him out. Idk of anything it missed except Garcia peed in the bushes somewhere

IKR, especially after objecting to prevent the officer stating that he was told what Wendi's vehicle looked like. Then specifically asking questions around being told that exact same thing....

Helen Keller 😂 LOL 😂

I know, right! I hope it was that obvious to the jury.

*a cocky millennial

Wendi was for certain involved. How did they know he was back from a business trip. The information of his gym the house etc.

Mite not b much inheritance left when lawyers get done

She don’t get her kids that goes to them when they come of age

@@joetoes3375he hadn't been. He was due to visit his gf in ny the day after murder

He drilled that officer forever, accusing him of making it look to the jury like wendi pulled up to the crime scene. Turns out it WAS her who came by and turned around.

*pompous

correct

Yes. And Mr. Markels ex had her own attorney when she testified as well.

Obviously two defendants couldn't have the same lawyer; that would be a conflict.

If the client has no objection to the same counsel and submits to the court no objection they certainly have the same lawyer. Happens all the time (the parents of the school shooter named Ethan had the same lawyers but cut ties mid case )

Liz Cho will play Magbanua.

What do you have against Jessica alba? I think she's beautiful.

Depends on who is writing the check….the adelson clan is the $

Guilty of poor eyesight…just wait til u hit that age when things start falling apart…oh boy!

Hopefully her time is coming though

AG is setting up the case for Donna and I hope she is also setting up the case for Wendi

@@elizabethantoine9652Who is AG?

She should

Hopefully will be soon

It proves that the defendant has touched the document providing his phone number to the pawnshop and further supports that it was a phone number used for his personal business, versus the defense trying to claim it was added after the fact by police or was unknown to him.

I don’t think they knew at the time it was her car. She admits she drove by and saw police tape yet thought it was a tree that fell! The prosecution should have came down harder on her for that. Who drives by their house, sees police tape and thins it’s a tree fall?. I’m watching this again after her last testimony recently. This had few views and many following the case don’t know about this. You would think she would have wondering if her kids were ok etc IMO this is a huge red flag that she knew precisely the time to visit what she knew would be a crime scene.

She admitted to it. Was scared she had been identified

The police officer didn’t know who was in the car. No reason to stop the car

@@debbiemartin2026 I believe they might be saving the "come down harder on her" questions for a later date.

@@marshapieroni6677 yes. Georgia seemed to only ask those questions which she would lie to, so she wouldn’t have immunity if she were charged. It’s hard to wait it out to see what happens!

That is the stupidest comment anyone has made

Why do you think that?

He is the nicest, fairest judge I've ever seen.

Personal preference. They are equal. Judge evaluates the law. Jury evaluates the facts of the case.

This is not the only difference between court cases.

Everyone but the judge stands for the jury. The judge runs the courtroom. The jury are his guests. They answer to him. He instructs them.