well we do have rich fields and blue skies :D

Probably, he didn't play Europe Universalis, the game where, that sign represents clearly Orthodoxy.

"blue stands for the clear sky, the yellow for the rich fields and the red for the blood our people spilled throughout the ages " this symbolism is so wide spread , that even some organizations use it to explain their colors.

Very true

Blue is water

At least was a great dog

*I also forgot to mention that this is not an ordinary bull, is a species of bulls which, at least in Europe, exist just in Romania and Poland. The romanians call it "zimbru" which is a wild kind of bull

zimbru is in all of scandinavia, and even free not just in preservation, but yeah, it's a little bit different than E. European zimbru...

And the bull was actually named "Bour", a species of bull that once lived in the area, but sadly dissapeard.

It's an extinct kind of bull. It doesn't exits any more. It was called auroch. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurochs

Thank you so much! Love from Romania!

Potato Potato Patata C A R T O F

I'm from Romania

Is roman si nu ştiam asta ...

@@datboi3136 eu o stiu de la grădiniță, fiecare cu educatia lui.

@@InGGneruYTB şi inca o mai ti minte ? :)

@@datboi3136 Da

This is the last time I will say it. The man who killed most Ottomans or muslims how you want to call them was called "Vlad Tepes" and "Dracula" is someone else, Vlad Tepes was a normal human, not like Dracula!

Vlad Țepeș was the dankest thief rekter in Romanian history, he'd penetrate ANY thief, with a fucking WOOD SPIKE, through their ASS, out their MOUTH. Dracula is a vampire, the first vampire, made by Romanians, and has nothing to do with history, besides the fact that he's the first vampire.

Orthodoxy is catholic, ffs. Ask your priest or just google it!

@@d3rky916 His name was Vlad Drăculea actually.

@@zuraorokamono204 I know, I am romanian. But everony calls him Vlad Țepeș.

Lol its just steal XD

@@panhandlesomen the flag of Chad is actually a tribute to the French, they just look the same because Romania had a communist flag instead of the modern one, not everything is on the European side

Chad actually has a flag history though

Ne Intalnim si aici =))

românia are steag frumos

Salut

Cf?

Salut

me toooo

Filip Marian Bogdan și eu sunt Bogdan

Actually, no. The People's Republic of Romania became the Socialist Republic of Romania when Nicolae Ceaușescu became the president, or better saying, the dictator that ruled over Romania at that time (1965-1989)

1965 - 1989 you mean ? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Ceau%C8%99escu

@@grumpybollox7949 oh yeah, sorry for my mistake

It was called the Peoples republic of Romania from 1948 to 1965

the people`s republic of romania was from 1948 to 1965 from 1965 to 1989 it was called the socialist republic of romania no correction and apparently someone didn`t go to school

One month, not one year. Ups, ai gresit, nu-i nmk

sunt oltean si il consider pe Mihai Viteazu unul din cele mai slabe personaje istorice romanesti. si daca asociezi tricolorul cu perioada aia, ori nu cunosti istoria, ori ti s-a prezentat istorie contrafacuta cum de obicei se intampla in institutiile de invatamant de pe aici, ori mananci rahat cu polonicul.

@@cuoreazzuro cum poti spune ca Mihai Viteazul e unul dintre cele mai slabe personaje istorice cand el este PRIMUL voievod care a reusit sa uneasca toate 3 teritorii romanesti, fiind efectiv inconjurat de state muult mai puternice ca el, Imperiul Otoman, Regatul Ungar si Regatul Poloniei ?? Si in plus, Andrei Pop a zis doar ca se mai spune ca steagul are origini din acea vreme, nu ca a venit profesorul de istorie la ei in clasa si le-a zis "daca nu ziceti ca steagul nostru e de pre vremea lu Mihai Viteazul, aveti 4!" sau ceva de genu. Deci pe langa faptu ca esti praf la engleza, esri praf la tot, olteanule cum zici tu, ca-l faci de ras pe Mihai Viteazul numai pentru ca esti

@@cuoreazzuro fiecare cu parerea lui. BTW Tricolorul chiar este asemant cu Mihai. Io-s Ardelean.

Mihai Viteazu nu a unit nimic. a CUCERIT. Si a fost atat de priceput la politics incat ce a construit el (fara urma de indoiala pentru propriul beneficiu) a durat...cat? zi-mi tu ca te pricepi la istorie. Ideea de unitate nationala si de natiune romana a aparut mult mai tarziu. Nu poti vorbi de natiunea romana inainte de Scoala Ardeleana. sunt praf la istorie dar macar pun lucrurile in context si din cand in cand imi folosesc si bibilica. nu accept sa mi se vare istorie pe gat si sa o repet ca papagalul.

Sending back positive Karma

I fuking love you you know that ?

Mennnn kosvo is serbia, bosnia is serbia, balkan is serbia, the universe is serbia and God is serb.

we romanians salute you

It's an older map when the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro still existed.

BlueTheBerry Don’t let the will to protest die! It really makes a difference!

Some days ago somebody tried to assasinate Dragnea, but failed:(

@@manualofalternativemusic Somebody doesnt know english.

@@inconickuous547 :)))))))

@Wallachian Knight ce?

mai stai si pe la scoala,zic...

Și eu Same

O înveți prost, daca o înveți de la el. Există școala, există manuale scrise de istorici. Băiete, doar o mica parte din acest video e la subiect și adevărată.

Iti recomand sa citesti Istoria romanilor de Neagu Djuvara.

Che vach

Bravo.

Yes me.

The Real Eugenia Le dăm strike :))))

LA GREU

Cn e cu mn pentru atacarea Ciadului

Eu sunt.

И аз искам видео за българия ( want video for bulgaria too)

It wasn't an official flag but I think it should have been mentioned

True

1924? You mean 1990 maybe, in 1924 it was part of Greater Romania.

In 1924, the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was created on the Eastern bank of the river Dniester (ro: Nistru). It was meant to be a propagandistic territory, in order to attract "socialist workers" from Bessarabia. Same as Karelian SSR with the purpose of propagadistically targeting the Eastern part of Finland, same as Belarussian SSR targeting the Eastern part of then-Poland (inhabited by Slavic people). Please, check a map in order to see the exact territory of the interwar Moldavian ASSR. Then, in 1940, Moldavian ASSR was used by Soviet administration in order to annex to it Bessarabia and Northern Bukowina in order to create a full Soviet republic (Moldavian SSR), not a devolved Autonomous one. It was Khrushchev (Ukrainian ethnic) that proposed Stalin the dismantlement of the territory snatched from Romania, for the benefit of Ukrainian SSR. Therefore, the territories marked by Khrushchev as "majority Ukrainian" were carved out of the newly captured territory and include din Ukrainian SSR (Northern Bukowin, Hertza and its surrounding area, 2/3 of former Khotin County in Northern Bessarabia and another territory carved out of Southern Bessarabia). The remaining territory was annexed to Moldavian ASSR with was upgraded to a SSR. But wait! Khrushchev also saw "Ukrainian ethnic majority" in the interwar Moldavian ASSR! Therefore, he proposed the carving out of about 2/3 of the Md ASSR and its annexation to Ukr SSR. From the original Moldavian ASSR remained only a strip along the Eastern bank of the river Dniester. Stalin approved it all. Hence: the extended territory of Ukrainian SSR and a new map for the newest republic, Moldavian SSR. Moldavian SSR had a short life at first, only one year (1940-1941), being reattached to Romania. Nazi Germany offered Romania Transdniestria (ro: Transnistria), the entire territory between the rivers Dniester and Bug. But this is another story. Anyway, the territory of the former interwar Moldavian ASSR became part of the new Transnistrian Guvernorate, under Romanian administration (but not integrated in proper Romania!), between 1941-1944. In 1944, with a Red Army on advance dismantled the Transdnestrian Guvernorate and reannexed Bessarabia, Northern Bukowina and Hertza and its surroundings to USSR, thus reinstating 1940-1941 borders (USSR-Romanian international border and Ukr SSR-Md SSR Soviet-internal border). In 1948, the Soviet-puppet government of Romania "renegociated" Romanian border with USSR, "willingly" offering USSR several islets on the Chilia branch of the Danube river and the Serpents' Island. This small snippets of land were annexed to Ukrainian SSR (same Khrushchev as territorial management advisor...). The current Republic of Moldova has the exact borders of Moldavian SSR had between 1940-1941 and 1944-1991 (until Rep. of Moldova became an independent state). About 98% of the territory of the original Md ASSR (1924-1940) that was included in the then-new Md SSR (meaning that stripe of land along the Eastern bank of the Dniester river) seceeded in 1990 from Md SSR as Transdniestria. Since then, it exists as a separatist territory, under its own independent administration, but unrecognized by any UN member state (only recognized by Abkhazia, Sourthern Ossetia and Artsakh aka Nagorno-Karabakh). (Leaving aside any subjectivity on the matter, this is the raw reality). Rep. of Moldova claims the territory as its own, Transnistria claims the territory as an independent country of its own. During the Transdniestrian conflict, the separation line between Rep, of Moldova proper and Transnistria fluctuated, as a regular frontline. After the fighting ceased, the line of control did not strictly followed the river Dniester: separatists also occupied the city of Tighina (aka Bender) + its surroundings and the village of Chițcani + its surroundings, but lost to Moldavian govermental troops the control of the Coșnița, Doroțcaia and Cocieri villages + their surroundings (all near the city of Dubăsari). I don't claim of having the whole truth, but the all-sides accepted reason for which the current Transnistria is Russian-language majority is the fact that in 1990, under the then-rumoured future independence of Moldavian SSR and its rumoured later attachement to Romania, there were fears among Russian ethnics that the Romanian authorities along with "angry" mobs of Romanian ethnics living in Bessarabia will kill Russian ethnics. Several small community conflicts fueled these fears and, therefore, some Russian ethnics moved East of the river Dniester, were the ethnic balance was more inclined in the favor of the Russian ethnics. Same fears but in reverse circulated among Romanian ethnics living in the so-called Transdniestrian Strip, that "angry" mobs of Russian ethnics will kill them, so they fled West the river Dniester. Same fears were among Ukrainian ethnics living in Moldavian SSR, so some of them moved into the Transdniestrian Strip. This facts (as stated, accepted as mere "disinformation" and "stupidity" by all sides) are the reason why the current secessionist Transinstria has three official languages: Russian, Ukrainian and the Soviet-propaganda invented "Moldavian" language (mainly Romanian language with several regionalistic expression/words, but written in Cyrillic alphabet). There you have it. The history of the borders of Russian-controlled Moldavian ASSR > Moldavian SSR > Rep. of Moldova.

@@laurentiupopa79 it was today's transnistria, not Moldova

ceau

Love Romania from PSD

sal cf

@IranianGames love from Romania to Iran

That is what I learnt in school as well :)))

how is it even related to the french revolution

@@confuseddog6746 France is famous for its French Revolution and inspired many other smaller countries in Europe to no longer be subjects/vassal states of powerful empires. in case of Romania, we Romanians fought against the Ottoman Empire for independence. Greeks, Serbs, Bulgarians as well.

Portugal uses a shield xd

*I said almost every medieval country* *but only moldova from what i know uses a bull*

I know

Medieval bulgaria also used a bull for some time. A very angry bull

Actually that's an Auroch. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurochs

1. The Dacians never used what we would identify today as flags. 2. Neither Dacia Ripensis nor Dacia Mediterranea were on land that would become Romania save for a few settlements along the banks of the Danube. These provinces were almost entirely in what is now Bulgaria and Serbia. 3. Justinian I never "united" the two provinces that have nothing to do with Romania. 4. Quit talking out of your ass.

@@TheWoollyFrogThis combination of colours could very well have been attached to the Dacian standard. In any case, this Dacian "draco" went on to be adopted by Roman legions and in the Roman military archives 'Notitia Dignitarium" we have mentioned the combination blue, yellow and red. Romanians actually lived in modern day Serbia and Bulgaria as well. For many centuries they were a discriminated majority in the province of Timoc (Serbia) and they asked to be united with Romania after WWI, but that didn't happen. Many Romanians lived in Bulgaria, there was even a medieval Romanian-Bulgarian state in the twelfth-thirteenth century. People in medieval times and up to Michael the Brave's time often referred to what is now Romania as Dacia, and we can see that on some of the maps of the period. Michael the Brave probably knew about that, but regardless, he used blue, yellow and red on diplomas given to people he named as high ranking officials, such as Preda Buzescu as the "mare ban" of Craiova. It is a combination of colours that also existed on miniatures of religious books, in paintings or embroidery.

Are you talking about the shields in Notitia Dignitarium? Then, yes, those colour combinations are there along with many other colours that you ignore. And the Romanian-Bulgarian state? You mean the Second Bulgarian Empire where Vlahs were a minority ruled over by Slavs? Yes, Vlahs did live in Thrace and Macedonia before and after migrating further north across the Danube. The idea of national colours or national flags did not exist in those times. Any such stories that justify the selection of these 3 colours prior to the 19th century are driven by nationalistic confirmation bias.

@@TheWoollyFrog Then why did they select these colours in the nineteenth century ?

Quite simply because some voivodes liked them and the sultan approved their use on the Wallachian battle flag. There is no grand reason. And as is the case with many other things in Romanian history, we can't be sure of certain origins.

God bless Romania ! 🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴

100% accurate

And Green is for honest "politicians"

Red is for Muie Dragnea

@@thenamelessone7343 lol =))

Have you ever heard the origin of the romanians? There was Romolus, Remus and Romanus. Since Romulus and Remus were sucking the life giving milk of the shewolf and were occupying all of the space, Romanus couldn't near the shewolf, so the only thing he could do to survive was to suck on the c*ock of the "father" wolf for manmilk. Thus came the populus romanius.

Roma Channel they are the same bessarabia will come home soon mark my words

The Dacian Draco was a religious symbol flown into battle. National flags did not exist back then and neither did nations.

@@TheWoollyFrog the term of nation as we know it didnt exist well into medieval times

I know because I learned this from the kindergarten and I’m Romanian and I live in Romania, I LOVE ROMANIA, I appreciate your video

Dacians which inhabited the general region SINCE 1200-600 BC (and at least until 4th century after Christ - the free Dacians). In 10,000 BC those were not Dacians.

no, its very different, not even closely similar. Its most simiar to Italian.