Babe: Pig in the City

Mad Max Fury Road. But I couldn't get into Happy Feet.

Probably this one tbh, recency bias be damned

Fury road

happy feet, his most spiritual

I dont believe it

real💀💀

Bro watched a movie...

BBL Krizzy

BBL Krizzy

Self hatred sucks 😔

Chat gpt gimme a mix of all races and cgi it into a person:

It's CGI because Australia isn't real, it's entirely CGI

CGI isn't inherently bad. What is actually bad is when it is noticeable

💀FURRI0SA🔶: A Mad-Max "Saga"; .... _*Without* Mad-Max in it; (as even a _tertiary_ character ) ([{ *VERDICT* )}] -+- The CGl was tacky & *_cheap_*_ looking:_ thus, price of the $35 Imax Ticket to see was _not _*_worth_*_ it._ 🏴‍☠"Yarrrggh!!!"🏴‍☠ (📽HoIIyW00D Exec: _"It'll Sell Like _*_Gang-busters!!!"_* ~ "$29 Million Dollar WW Open Take🎞👎)

And yet, some still call it a girl boss, because men assign that whenever they don’t like a main female lead

@kirstyc2176 If it was "girl boss" at all, it was old school "girl boss". I felt that character earned her capabilities. She was not some sort of unstoppable force. The problem is; modern Hollywood has conditioned audiences to just reject characters which might even give off the vibe that they might be just that. Some great films with awesome female leads will be overlooked because of all of the junk we've grown accustomed to having forced down our throats. It's unfortunate but understandable.

@@Pantheragem Buddy, in this political climate? You are wasting your time. Like, people's minds are utterly broken. All you need is black or woman to be woke to these people. It doesn't matter if this is actually a good film this time. This culture war fucked movies over.

@@Pantheragem "I felt that character earned her capabilities." the problem is that's very feelings based, and many men don't agree with you - any Strong female character you can think of, I guarantee men took issue with in the time of the film/shows etc release. Also you say female character's have to earn it - so you must have not like Furiosa much from the first movie? given that she was badass from the start with no time wasted to explain why she was badass.

@@Darth_Bateman u sound fun

I always felt that Fury Road had a bit of a weird uncanniness as well but always chalked it up to a stylistic choice. It felt very intentional

I think it's crazy that Miller was able to scale up Furiosa from an anime to a feature length film.

I think some shots weren't finished, like this one at 1:35, in the movie they have way more dust under the car, so it looked much, much better.

Yeah, that's how I felt. Some of it was still dodgy. Like when the vuvalini woman, mom, jumps onto the horse as it's running. It reminded me of Legolas flying around that giant elephant in RotK. Still, really liked the film! It wasn't as good as FR, but it was really solid.

@@zacharyberridge7239 The horse thing was one of only two shots that really stood out for me as being bad CGI. (The other also involved a human body in motion.) I think in general it looked great, especially on a giant IMAX screen.

A lot was shot on the volume, it looks like they’re standing in front of LED screens because they are. So it’s not just the cgi it’s also the depth perception and LED color matching.

That’s exactly right. There was always like a good 45 minutes between noticable CG moments so it didn’t really break my immersion…

I guess dummy stand ins or shot choices which don't linger on noticeable cgi would be the obvious preference.

That's what the stuntman is for

@@papabird4425 and for what ? stuntmen don't have any oscars. They can do all death defying stunts as much as they want but never get the recognition they deserve. Jackie Chan could get away with it because he was playing lead and helped with marketing of the move, similar with Tom Cruise.

I mean fury road did a better job tho compared to this one so why not do more practical stunts

@@19main89 because muh cgi

100%. I'm the same as you, didn't notice any CGI issues. I think if your biggest criticism of a film is a handful of poor CGI moments then that really shouldn't take away much from the film

Same I didn’t notice any CGI issues and was completely engrossed in the world Miller created

My exact opinion

Great idea 😂

Furiosa Hates Mondays 😖

@@Arawn505 but she doesnt look, like she loves lasagna

Furifield

Furiosa: A Garfield Saga

Poor Things was the same for Mark Ruffalo.

I thought he was miscast, didnt like him at all

He had the flashier role and boy did he nail it. 💪🏻

I thought Anya Taylor Joy was definitely the best cast, even with few lines she stole the show

Thank you, a person of culture

🗣🔥🔥🔥

Punished "Furiosa" Snake

Another person of culture. Very fair comment. Thank you

Better used to enhance rather than compose completely, I so agree. But yeah the sandstorm in Fury Road doesn’t look bad at all, so obviously CGI is useful to practically create the majority of the scene in a lot of cases, but some looks better than other

When was the last time you watched Fury Road? There is a LOT more CGI than you probably think

@@locmari Yes....green screens, some touch ups, additions in certain scenes, a lot of the Citadel, etc...... but my comment is an exact response to your comment, as people keep bringing up its perfect complimentary use of CGI to downplay how much is done in camera.

If you look at behind the scenes videos, even the cars driving through the sandstorm was done for real, with the sandstorm added over it - and the storm is so well stylised and visually sumptuous that it doesn't take you out. When you see Fury Road and Furiosa side by side, it's hard to compare. In Furiosa I could almost spot every transition between 'real car' and 'CG car' even within a single shot - I don't think there's a single moment in Fury Road where I'm taken out of the film by a full CG car.

he's right tho

I had to look it up

And Babe 2: Pig in the City

And ghost directed Babe 1

Bro also directed the Witches of Eastwick. He has some of the most insane range of any director imo lol

Can comfirm. Didn't notice much bad cg. Only a bunch of shots with noticable green screen

I did but who cares the sounds of those cars and the action is masterful

You and I must be watch Different Movie.. FURY ROAD is BY FAR BETTER than this movie...

@@va1354 He said "some" of the best action, how about you read what he said and not what you want to read?

Movie in IMAX was insane. Might have to catch it again before it goes

Getting to be able to audition for it is definitely a cool story to have still

Still super cool you have a slight connection to this behemoth. That’s awesome

That's true, thanks! 🌟

You'll get there one day bro. Don't give up 👍.

HOLY, really which I had such experience... For me it's like: You know it's technically impossible to be an actor but heck, not even an audition (btw I'm programmer by trade nothing to do with cinema).

I have no idea why people are so crazy about actions. Furiosa had a ton of action scenes and on top of that the storyline is like 100 times better.

It was ass

Long Rant incoming: Not really. Furiosa was a very bloated film. Pacing slowed by its very pointless first chapters which are up so much time that none of the interesting characters got a chance to develop or interact in any meaningful way. Aka Dementus. There is only the silhouette of a tragic character but again no real substance because the useless filler acts that ate up so much screen time for absolutely no reason. If we had just cut the whole of act 1, nothing would have drastically changed. And instead we got a script of Furiosa actually sacrificing bits and pieces of herself to rise to the rank of Imperator, just for the sake of vengeance would be so much more interesting than the time skip. Then there is Praetorian Jack. He was the most useless addition in the entire movie. His motivation and interest is absolutely absent. He has a very one dimensional stoic personality. Who is he? How did he becomes Praetorian? Why does he want to help Furiosa? What does she teach Furiosa about road combat? Who knows because guess what, time skip. Unlike Fury Road which was a very tightly written script where every setup had a payoff. For example: In Fury Road Max is forced to give his blood as a human blood bag and when Furiosa asks for Max's name, he only grunts as he doesn't want to be friends or chums, he is only doing what he needs to survive. By the end, Max willingly gives his blood, and his name. Similarly, the movie starts with a race away from the citadel which was seen as a prison but then it turns into a race towards the citadel as the symbol of hope. Meanwhile, Furiosa was just action for action's sake. The script was just an excuse for fight sequences. And Anya Taylor Joy's Furiosa was very underwhelming. All her character seems to do is scowl. "Hey girl why you sneaking?" *Scowl* "Hey, who are you?" *Scowl* "I will teach you the way of the road warrior! *Scowl* "I am the man that murdered your mother. *Scowl* "Here have some food." *Scowl* And the ending was just so disappointing. Furiosa just gets superpowers after she loses her arm.

Totally agree. People are just pathetic.

Thats not a sequel it’s part of one story

Dune 2 was mid

​@@fernandofaria2872 tell that to movies bros and you're dead

Dune 2 does not deserve its hype at all

@@MalcomMaledictionI agree.

True, but most animation studios that production companies hire for their movies aren't even located in the United States. Animation as a medium is largely outsourced to developing countries like India and North Korea of all places. Maybe this movie did hire an American animation studio, I genuinely have no idea, but unfortunately, paying animators better doesn't guarantee that they'll keep their jobs.

@@user-rf1op3uh6n at least giving them more time to do the job should make it, often these houses are swamped with projects with little time to make them all

Definitely begter!! More begter in fact!!

yes definitely begter

yes way more begter

this is a perfect description of how i felt watching the trailer!

Having watched it, i honestly think it wasn’t that bad. I was hesitant to go because of the CGI but while it was noticeable occasionally it never detracted from the experience, for me atleast. Highly recommend it

See it in a good theater

​@@thijmenjankoksame. It didn't bother me in the slightest when I saw it yesterday, despite being initially a bit worried by the trailer.

Y'all need to stop picking everything to death and live. While y'all were debating the mass and density of falling objects... I saw an excellent film This is SUCH. a fantastic movie!

Just sitting here patiently for his Megalopolis review. Predict much stammering and crumpling into laughter, as is the Runquist way.

@@samfilmkid I just know he has a Cannes video to make, what I watched this month which will have some bangers (i want to hear his thoughts on i saw the tv glow), and then yeah megalopolis is gonna be a great review.

I hope you enjoyed it. I certainly checked my expectations and still thought it was very good. I think, if this was the first "mad max" film to ever come out, we actually would've been blown away. It's still a great film on its own, just isn't what fury road was: a masterpiece.

How was is it? I seen it too I give it 10/10 new tone of movie for me

You liked it?

Is this satire

You're not watching a "Mad Max Saga" - you're watching a "Furiosa Saga". This film has nothing whatsoever to do with the character of Mad Max. Another good title would have been "Furiosa: a WASTELAND SAGA". Including Max's name in it is just bizarre. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the Furiosa character and can't wait to see it tomorrow - I'm just saying, calling it a "Mad Max" saga makes no sense.

It has nothing to do with the characters but got everything to do with the world that those characters live in , WTF is so hard to understand?!

@@afroahmed3989 i understand your point and agree but you need to calm down

@@redadamearthit probably makes sense once you realise they’re going to build off of it hence why furiosa max meet in fury road and they’re probably do a sequel to that.

Eternal forever?

@@fletchy40shiny and chrome?

fury road relied on that visceral intensity MUCH more than furiosa does in order to convey its narrative and stakes to be fair

You're not entirely wrong, but the two possible options weren't Furiosa with CGI or Furiosa with practical effects. The options were Furiosa with CGI or no movie at all. And I'll take the movie please

You definitely haven't watched furiosa.

​@joshgiannini1804 the problem isn't that the movie uses CGI, it's that the CGI/set extension looks pretty bad to the point of being immersion breaking.

Its really not that bad. Its not gonna take you out of it. It still is MUCH better than most Blockbusters today

Not even close, this movie was like a shitty B grade version of Fury Road.

It has the best action scene between the two and it has a better story so… idk it feels to early to say but i feel like it could be

⁠U haven't even watched the movie so this doesn't make sense

@@The_Gake😂😂😂😂 just stop

Fury road is much better

So did I. I like long movies with world building and character building and there's more of that here.

​@@darinherrick9224That's what I thought too!

I feel like Furiosa is much more thematically rich and expansive than Fury Road was

Yup I rewatched Fury Road the day after I saw Furiosa and for me Furiosa is just the better movie. Fury Road is still great but the character and world building of Furiosa make it better for me.

Funny enough, George Miller talks about these two different styles. He figured those that loved fury road so much wouldn't like furiosa as much, and vice versa. Both are good. But the way the world works and is presented so well in fury road, it's remarkable how we are thrown into it all and can still follow without having to understand everything. I enjoyed Furiosa too though

wait, where did the story start for you?

@@TheNetflixNook Right after Furiosa and her BF leave the Bullet farm.

@@hongquiao That's a wild place to jump in

@@hongquiaobro that’s crazy 💀

The reviews for Schrader are straight hating no in-between however with Coppola there is heavy polarisation their gonna give the palme d'or to Lanthimos or something Schrader and Coppola films were not exactly positively reviewed

@@realhillkell I agree, it would just be funny if either Coppola or Schrader won.

Agreed

That explains a lot because CGI in Bollywood movies look dogshit, like actual cartoon compared to high budget Hollywood productions, but the gap is closing now. But CGI in Furiosa isn't that bad. It's not Marvel bad.

Yeah

ohhhh yeahhhhhhh

He didn’t like it

@@KarstenRunquist mmmm, not what i was hoping to hear but it will still be nice to know your thoughts

​@@AhmedHussein-sp9tq he gave it 3 1/2 stars on Letterboxd

It doesnt sound like it. Keep only mentioning Fury Road.

I wondered that when he said it was the most detailed vision of the world since he started the trilogy. Because that doesn’t make sense. The first Mad Max lays the ground work and then Road Warrior basically explains everything.

​@@charleylandes2016 Yeah hes clueless