Do you have a link? Sorry if I am asking for too much.

@@cheng3580 I can’t really link shows on tubi I think but just download it and you can watch it for free again I’m glad so many people wanna try and watch this show but pls this is like my only popular video :’v

@@RATBOY-il8pu ah sorry. Thank you

@@cheng3580 no problem have fun watching the show :>

Tubi is not available in my area sadly

"Used up the Australians. Artillery shells cost money. The dead cost nothing."

To think people actually got paid to think up these "tactics" 😂😂😂 like, what the actual fuck?!! Had they no concept of artillery?!

​@@OhNotThat you're a fucking wordsmith! Absofuckinlutey well said!

@@dscrappylocogolani9555 Zero coordination between the branches and the navy using a different time system leading to the naval bombardment stopping far too early.

It’s true but the artillery stopped because the soldiers time and the navy’s time was different

Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives … you are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries, wipe away your tears. Your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.” Atatürk, 1934

@@tugrulgul5903 beautiful words, kind sentiment.

@@tugrulgul5903 Beautiful. I wish as many leaders today could speak with such sincerity.

Is that the same for the Armenians that the Turks killed by genocide?

😢 poor lads

that’s pretty heavy

Honor

Mustafa Kemal, "Ataturk" 1934

😔

When YOUR English sucks

The sad thing is, they hadn't figured out the tactics to do anything else. That WAS the only tactic. You can see in the newer histories that the generals were desperately trying new ways to get around it, and they all ended... well like this. Industrial warfare is just industrial mass slaughter with mass casualties, and even today we don't really have a good answer to it (see ukraine).

Donkeys

your

@@AaronAlekseyevich 🤔

they probably thought no way those indigenous locals defeat the mighty British empire

This ain't soldering. This is using men as cannon fodder. Stupid.

Australians are cowards

@@ahsansariyadi29 what are u even on about…

@@Antares383he’s saying that the west saw the ottomans as barbaric and incompetent when in reality they were not

Johnny Turk he was ready ...

And the Band played Waltzing Maltilda. as we stopped to bury our slain. And we buried ours and the Turks buried theirs, and it started all over again. THose who were living? Just tried to surive, in the mad world of Blood, Death & Fire. for 10 weary weeks I kept myself alive, while around me the corpes piled higher. Then a big Turkish shell knocked me arse over head, and when I awoke in me hospital bed, I saw what it had done, I wished I were dead...never knew there were worse things than dying. For no more will I go Waltzing Matilda, all raound the green bush far and near. For to hump tent and pegs, a man needs both legs. No more Waltzing Matilda for me

They collected the cripples, the wounded and Maimed And they shipped us back home to Australia The legless, the armless, the blind and insane Those proud wounded heroes of Sulva And as our ship pulled into circular quay, I looked at the place where me legs used to be And thank Christ there was nobody waiting for me…to grieve and to mourn and to pity And the band played Waltzing Matilda, as they carried us down the gangway. But nobody cheered, they just stood and stared…And they turned all their faces away

I wish peace to all soldiers who lost their lives here in Turkish soil. I have been called by the Turkish Army for the mandatory service today. I'll be respectfull to anyone regardless of race, sexual oriantation and reliigon.

You were alive during WW1?

@@DtotheK88 Ye bro, I was there. Faaar out, you should'a seen me goin' ham out there mate

Those generals should have been tried for war crimes

Old men 50-70 sending out 18 year olds fresh outta grade school to experience life cut short

War isn't that simple. Maybe it was a feint attack to draw reserves away from another sector where an attack or amphibious landing was to take place. Communications were pretty shite in them days and these weren't professional trained officers and soldiers who can carry out complex manoeuvres. It was still a waste of young life obviously.

You can be sure that all the men responsible for this are rotting in Hell. So i guess thats something.

@@jamestaylor5341 A feint attack, who knows... but the dead weren't feint, and for what result ?

Basically the rich hate us, and I have served in Ganners and iraq

even decades later when Winston announced" I have a cunning plan" ANZAC and canadian troops started trembling!!

@@angusmcculloch6653 they didn’t have a choice. They’d probably be executed

@@angusmcculloch6653 you say with your fat arse sat in your chair achieving nothing

The one with Mel Gibson?

@@Dilley_G45 Yes.

Same battle it was supposed to be.

The artillery support did not even hit the Turkish positions because the crews feared that one of their shells would fall into their own men

@@larryalvares1369 The Ottomans still took cover during the shelling.

fucking english.!!!!!!!!!!!

Stupidity is not respect worthy. That colonel is a fucking fool.

Women want to be equal to men? Insanity. Men can be monsters and poets. This is dark and a shame that the military was too rigid to the point of being useless. RIP mates.

They had artillery support

Respect? For who? Sympathy is what i’m feeling.

​@@doogleticker5183what??

Always! soldiers never die! and we will take care of the soldiers who left this world untill we all leave and meet them.

That's what I find interesting about Turkey - we fucking tried to invade them a century ago, and they've been nothing but cool about it. Turkish soldiers guard and participate in the ANZAC Day ceremony in Çanakkale, they treat all visitors like friends, and their food is amazing.

It was 4 waves but yeah brave lads

4 waves

It wasn’t just the battle of the nek and also the battle of the Somme had suffer 1 million deaths in total.

this is a great comment and should see more consideration

Even if he was right with this one, I wish he rots in hell

@@TovarischMakarov why is that?

@@kubortthedane9487 he was a freemason filth

@@ahmadfrhan5265 ya for arabs

@@trabacula2000 no for real

No a dead whitey anglo is a good thing

A pointless war fought between Europeans that the Ottoman Empire had no business in entering. The empire was in serious decline and worse still stood nothing to gain from it even if the Central Powers had won. The only silver lining is that the empire finally collapsed once and for all because of it and Ataturk, one of the greatest statesmen of all time, was able to take the reigns and modernise Turkey. Sad that his legacy is being trampled on in modern Turkey, and sick that he is worshipped by the people who'd make him turn in his grave.

@@shaddaboop7998 Ataturk literally destroyed what was once a proud Muslim empire. He pushed secularism that has since wreaked havoc on Turkey. I'm glad that some modern Turks are finally portraying Ataturk as the villain that he was.

Did you vote Erdogan

Yeah you really defended it from those Armenians.

Well-stated. Truth.

There must have been quite a few vets still around in the 1980s no?

​​@@Adonnus100 I did most of my primary schooling in New Zealand. One of our teachers of our teachers was a Gallipoli veteran. He was still there when we left at the end of 1976. I believe he was teaching till about 1983. I remember seeing him march on ANZAC Day, in our town. All the vets were in various groups, except for one, elderly Maori gentleman, named Parki Withers. Parki was marching alone. So, I asked our cub leader, why Mr Withers was alone. She said, it was because he was not a WWI or WWII veteran. He was a veteran of the Boer War! Parki was 92 then. He marched as briskly as the Korean War vets and lived alone, without assistance. Years later, in Australia, we heard that Parki had huge celebration for his 100th birthday. There was plenty of wine, women, and song. Parki was found dead the next morning, with a smile on his face. I went back to the town in 2015. About a half dozen times, different people told me that Parki was smiling, when he died. True.

“Without a sign his sword the brave man draws…and asks no omens but his country cause.”-homer.

If I remember ,230 + men gone in minutes

@Jamon Hartzer I read that the fourth wave accidentally stepped off- as in, they started the assault prematurely by accident and the rest of the wave ended up trying to follow into the attack and ate the same fate. A bloody time To be a young military age male.

and it is said only 3 men out of all 4 waves made it to the Ottoman Firing range. Absolute waste of young men's lives Turns out one was hit in the ankle and crawled all of the way back to their trench

I have a question. I have always heard that there was a report that said an Australian army flag in the Turkish tranches. Is this even true? I personally hasn’t looked it up.

@@barackobama0101 I've read the same thing; That they didn't cancel the waves because there were rumors that the Aussie flag had been spotted at the forward trenches of the Turkish. In my opinion? That could A: Been a very, very small handful that made it trying to get help, B: The Turks using a captured flag as deception to lure more into the meat grinder, or C: A product of the fog of war and personal hopes. You hope to see what your mind wants you to see- But in reality, it wasn't there. But those are just my opinions on it having read into the same thing!

Sonunda bir türk

Nothing compared to what they did to the Armenians though.

I am pretty sure my great uncles did not see any single armenian in their life time as they are from central steppes of Anatolia, and I believe you can do better to help Armenians instead of bringing all topics to Armenian problem that we buried to the ground literally and figuratively a hundred years ago, and only we hear pathetic whiny moans under KZfaq videos. You can go to Karabakh to stand alongside Armenians and face the consequences. @@universalis8208

​@@universalis8208my grandgrandmother was raped and then tortured to death with her unborn baby in her stomach by armenian separatists. So ssttffuu

@@universalis8208 That's why Armenia denied to investigate what happened to Armenians in Anatolia. Stop believing what American Woke gave you and search yourself. You actually believing what Kim Kardashian claimed a nonsense, pathetic. The who attempted a holocaust were Armenians against Turkish villagers aka "Innocents".

My great great aunt lost her husband at quite a young age. My nana told me that when she was a child she asked her why she didn't remarry. She was told that there wasn't anyone to marry, as so many people of her generation were all wiped out during the war. In the small town she lived in they lost more than the average

uou glorify stupidity

Do you have an idea of what the song is called? I’ve looked everywhere

@@wizards2k I think it's called The Dying Stockman.

Do u need a tissue?😂

​@@ChurchofFoscolodo you need therapy? 😂

My eyes moisten every time I see it. His smile after saying it is priceless. Then, the smile fades, and they know what is coming, which is heart-wrenching. Bless them all. Brave gents!!

Do you know it name?

@@RealG05 Look up gallipolli soundtrack 'The Nek'

The same with the Germans at one time on Chrismas day they even got out of there trenches and celibrated christmas with our side !

And the cruelty of the British commanders towards the ANZAC soldiers

@@thebreadboy0419 Mate, the commander of the 3rd Light Horse Brigade (the guys getting killed) was an australian. Get your facts from proper sources and not tv shows

No mainly the stupidity of the Gallipoli invasion as well as the battle of the Nek. The WWI-style infantry charges are the most effective only with artillery support. The British decision to land at Gallipoli was a haste operation with severe underestimation of the Turkish army, and they used ANZAC troops as expendables which contributed to this scene.

@@longxiao9823 Well underestimating the Ottoman army was a rather understandable thing given that they had been soundly defeated during the Balkan Wars by much smaller nations and Italy before that. And the ANZACs were not treated as expendable, no general ever treats any of his troops as expendable, that would just be a waste any idiot can see that.

@@samallen3564 Yeah that's of course the ideal. But if you have seen the entire mini series you would know that it wasn't the case at all.

Only Australians lost that day. No need to romantics.

There are a great many things wrong with this post. But, just picking on one in particular, you seem to be suggesting that Sir Ian Hamilton 'didn't care about anyone but himself'. I'm sure you know this from your extensive research, but in the summer of 1918 the highly decorated Australian officer Albert Jacka VC wrote to Hamilton a letter in which he concluded, 'As a member of the Australian Imperial Force, I feel that I need scarcely say how I look forward with very great pleasure to renewing my acquaintanceship with the first General the Force ever served under [i.e. Hamilton], and also one who was held in such high esteem by all ranks. Yours sincerely, Bert Jacka.' You may not think he was 'honourable' but the Australian troops who served under him certainly did. I prefer their judgement of the man over yours.

@@henrypulleine8750 Our troops had been taught to respect him. Just because they thought he was honourable, doesn't mean he was. Culture back then was very different to today. We don't have a nation which we regard as our motherland. All those brave soldiers did and they believed they were dying for king and country. Some diaries say that. You also forget that our troops were lied to time and time again by Hamilton. If Hamilton made it more a mission to create a better strategy in Gallipoli as opposed to trying to stop Bean and Murdoch revealing the disaster of the campaign then maybe it would have been different. Had he done his job instead of worrying about a few journalists who were trying to defeat the propaganda instead of creating propaganda like todays 'journalists'. Ian Hamilton did many things wrong and in the end, the fact that many of his comrades didn't see him fit to lead anymore. There was no doubt that prior to Gallipoli he was effective, however Gallipoli showed he his age or something in him went wrong. He lost his way and effectiveness, thus losing integrity. This is stuff we learn only after war. Of course he was held in high esteem back then. It was a completely different time.

Some unfortunate points of view here. Please deepen your research into Hamilton. Gallipoli was my research masters thesis and I feel like I have a pretty good handle on his strengths and weaknesses. By the standard of generals at the time, Hamilton was a top tier commander. His weakness was not his intelligence or strategic ability. The only real criticism I can place at his feet was his inability to ride roughshod over some pretty ordinary subordinate and variously incompetent ‘junior’ generals. His organization and implementation of the worlds biggest amphibious assault was sheer unadulterated brilliance. That he got within a whisker of pulling it off was incredible. There are many things to be shocked by in this campaign, but Hamilton was not one of them.

Ahh yes the old "jUsT foLoWinG OrDerS"

unfortunately I would say majority of wars are not started for real reasons, but are planned meticulously by the wealthiest people on our planet, the "elites". As long as they achieve their desired outcome, they do not care about the deaths that come along with it. Hell, look at ukraine, this is our new Afghanistan. This will continue to be prolonged as long as possible so politicians and the wealthy can siphon our tax money via laundering to ukraine. When are people going to realize this?

It's actually the most likely to succeed, there is now cover all over like it or not.

Massacre?Soldiers killed other soldiers during conflict.That's not a massacre.

war or not hats a pretty one sided exhange of led​@@musfikinsan3423

Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives … you are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side in this country of ours. You, the mothers, who sent their sons from far away countries, wipe away your tears. Your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.” Atatürk, 1934

Lest we forget my brother 🌺

I do tool, 10th light Horse Heritage Trail correct? Just walking through there breaks my heart.

Watch Gallopili starring Mel Gibson, That Hits HARD

Nowadays SJW complain about pronouns and you can go go prison for speaking up. If these men knew what their country would turn into they wouldve never fought. Same with the US. So many deaths in the wars just so blacks can now riot and kill innocent people. Those soldiers would rather fight for Germany would they know

They’re called murdering war criminals.

yucks nafo bot

Turn up the volume and you will hear it, especially in the ending scene.

@@Say-What I think what he means is the sort of gunshot that kills outright is quite rare. Most shots are an injury. Most death is when those injuries aren't treated immediatly. For realism there should be more injured than dead.

@@nvelsen1975 well atleast he was injured when he fell into the enemy trench and it’s really not necessary to see that officer kill that young soldier he would’ve taken him prisoner.

@@Antares383 *e would’ve taken him prisoner.* He really wouldn't. Turks took around 200 Australian prisoners during the war, and for context almost 400 Australians were killed and wounded in just this assault.

@@jillsjakes2519 ottoman: nah we don’t have enough camps for new prisoners. Germany: *let’s take atleast 1 million Russian prisoners of war.*

These are mainly British soldiers with some ANZACs. In fact british soldiers outnumbered ANZACs at gallipoli and had far, far more casualties, same with the french who most dont even know were there

@@Ukraineaissance2014 I posted that comment last year in tribute to the ANZACS on Australian ANZAC day. It wasn’t comment on whose side lost most men, it was simply remembering the heroism of the ANZACS. I’m sorry you felt the need to disparage their achievements and defame them and their bravery. I’m not saying most men weren’t brave, I’m simply saying that at Gallipoli the ANZACS, thousands of miles from home ran towards German ‘slayer’ machine guns to protect the Commonwealth. They answered the call and they acted like all outstanding warriors of old….with great courage and discipline. I on the other hand would have probably got myself shot by my commanding officer because I’d have stood up and before the ranks massed before me I’d have said “fuck this, I’m having none of it. We dont stand a chance and I’m not going to spill my blood and die here for a bunch of elite war profiteers, wire pullers, masters of war. I’m going to throw my gun in the sea and I’m going to head to the nearest peaceful place and have an ice cold beer and write to my girl and tell her I’m on my way home because this war is so obviously about geopolitical issues, there is no clear enemy or reason to fight them. See you soon my love, here’s to a happy future”. I’m sure my CO would then have murdered me but then I’d have become a true martyr, dying for peace and having seen the hands pulling our wires and exposing them. My death would have meant something other than just being used as gun fodder hurled at the German/Turkish guns in hope of clogging the guns up. But that didn’t work and tens of thousands of innocent men were murdered with no hope of escape at Gallipoli.

@@jackmcgregor1983 The Generals were not or are not to blame. There was no way to break a machine gun positon until the British invented the tank.

@@kincaidwolf5184 so why keep throwing young men into the deadly fire that they knew they couldn’t stop? I like the analogy of the meat grinder, the generals wanted to push so many men toward the machine guns that they could over run the guns with dead bodies. Metaphorically clogging the guns with dead meat.

@@jackmcgregor1983 So you blame the Generals for sending men into a meat grinder but attack someone for trying to be innovative like Churchill? Who played a key role in the creation of the tank and who tried to end the war by doing an amphibious landing. You just don't understand the dynamics or technology avaliable in 1914. You couldn't do anything but throw massive infantry charges. How else do you win? The British and French couldn't just sit there when Russia was getting wiped out.

No, by this time they were just as numb to it when you see that sort of death day in and out. Gallipoli was on a larger scale, but not new unfortunately.

That did not happen

​@@chrisbuesnell3428inanmak istemeye bilirsin ama oldu

@@chrisbuesnell3428 it did. go look.

Türk olarak anlatıyorum olayın doğrusu şudur : Rütbesiz bir Türk askeri bir taarruza daha hazırlık yapan düşmanı dürbün ile görür. 22 yaşında olan Türk askeri neredeyse savunmasız olan düşman askerini öldürmek istemez ve "Enough" "Dont come" diyerek bağırır.

This happens way to often in real life unfortunately. Commanders will often "blindly" follow orders and not improvise to adapt to a situation.

In real life some entente and central commanders were charged with war crimes and some even executed via firing squad

@@M3xVerstappen1 any sources for this? Im very curious about it. Fuck these generals sending troops to die

Agreed. Sons of bitches.

This was just a slice of the war. You could replay this scene over and over a thousand times and still not match the scope of slaughter on the other fronts. The Italian front in particular was just like this, only with sharp rock shards flying everywhere as a bonus. Wave after wave of young Italians killed in the many battles of the Izonso.

an officer somewhere fucked the fire plan

I'm not sure but did the Turks used the marker flags to lure more Anzacs? 9:25

@@colleen9026 The Turkish officer shouted at them to "Stop, for God's sake stop!" The marker was miscommunication to the Brits. The attack came late because their clocks were not aligned with the clocks of the Navy guns.

It was unrealistic to expect such cohesive integration of artillery and infantry with in an age without rapid communication.

The vast majority of the ANZAC Forces were English or British born, with the rest being 2nd or 3rd generation British immigrants. The vast majority of losses at Gallipoli were by the British Army. I appreciate that you're proud to be Australian, but these men did not die for your Australia. They felt British and a connection to the British Empire and later Commonwealth.

Ben bir türküm ve burada savaşmış avustralyalılara saygı duyuyorum❤ Ataların saygıyı hakediyor onlar gercek bir kahraman❤

That won't stop them. They have no regard for human life

İnan bana hiçbir faydası olmaz tek çare onlarıda oraya savaş meydanına götürüceksin işte ozaman savaş istemezler

“My power - my *pleasure* - means more to me than your well-being.” I’ve heard this many times and it was applied to me - decades after this happened.

The elite do not give a fuck about us

in a war, it's the lowest classes that suffer the most

We aren't brothers we were enemies.

Defo not brothers

​@@muharebe_istasyonu Enemies? What year do you think it is? It's 2024, not 1915. Even in 1915, the Australians did not have any personal hatred towards the Ottomans. They were sent there by the british and were simply doing their job. Why do you still hold hatred for something that happened a hundred years ago?

What did we “win”, ww1 was the most unnecessary shedding of blood in history

@@ammonteasdale2703 The beginnings of a 20 year build up to an even deadlier sequel

@@dostap7748 Ww1 was deadlier , ww2 just more brutal.

@@ammonteasdale2703I don’t want to be that guy but if the gallipoli campaign was lost turkey probably wouldn’t have Istanbul today nor any other European possessions.

Then you learned that you doomed in Gallipoli!

​@@muharebe_istasyonu And then a few years later, your entire empire crumbled the British took your lands. Nice one.

Thank you for this information. This comment should be pinned at the top of the comments for clarity and historical accuracy. My Grandfather served in the 42nd Battalion in France,returned home after marrying the English nurse that took care of him when wounded (gas,shrapnel and shell shock)

The casualty rate was almost 2/3, not 50%, and the 2nd wave did go just 2 minutes after the 1st wave. Most experts now agree that after the 1st wave was cut down in 30 seconds, it should have been obvious to all that sending out subsequent waves was futile. While the daylight in this scene is inaccurate, as it was 4:30 am in darkness as you say, the rest of the scene is fairly accurate.

@@erickollman4441 The attack took place over several hours. Each wave was separated by hours, not minutes. I haven't seen anything saying upwards of 66% casualties, only 50%.

​@@shaddaboop7998I think similar stuff was said about the battle of Somme where 19000 British troops were KIA being a big myth in general.

Bir türk genci olarak dedene saygı duyuyorum❤ o gerçek bir kahraman ❤

Damn slaughtered on the lip of their own lines.🤦

They are not heroes, change your sick mind. They are invaders who have been doomed. They are enemies.

​@@salguodrolyat2594 Vatanımızı işgalcilere veremezdik kusurabakma..

No one knew how to fight WW1

@@Copium6921 You can't even see the results of your orders when you are having a port back in a cosy battleship or chateau.

@@spudpud-T67 Your pfp tells me all i need to know that you are an uneducated libtard in WW2 Churchill was literally on a bridge being shelled by the Germans and had to be forced to leave Churchill was also a veteran so try learn some history before you start making it up

You might want to do some research on Churchills plan ,and what was actually attempted, they didn't even land close to were it was planned

Did they do anything for you or just were forced to die in a meaningless war on an irrelevant battlefield? The turks at least defended their home country...

@@ferenckonya8593 "The turks at least defended their home country" Was that before or after attacking Russia unprovoked or committing Genocide against the Armenians? Also Gallipoli a little like the war of 1812 for the US went a long way to forming a national identity for both Australia and NZ, so hardly meaningless.

We’ll war isn’t allowed in Australia but yes they were forced to sacrifice their lives for us@@ferenckonya8593

@@Delogros The "attacking Russia unprovoked" is funny because the alliances betweenthe powers were quite obvious and Russia was the first in the mobilization... The Gallipoli campaign was not a rescue mission for Armenians and the genocide begun two months after the beginning of the battle. Still something: How much is better to kill aboriginals in Australia than to kill Armenians in Turkey? More than 12000 Australian and New Zelandean soldiers died in a stranger continent, in a perfectly unsuccessful action, in a conflict in they were not naturally interested,...You really can be proud of it...

@@ferenckonya8593 "The "attacking Russia unprovoked" is funny because the alliances betweenthe powers were quite obvious and Russia was the first in the mobilization... " you know this sentence makes literally no sense right? Russia mobilizing for war with Ger,any has nothing to do with the Ottoman Empire attacking the Crimea unprovoked. "The Gallipoli campaign was not a rescue mission for Armenians and the genocide begun two months after the beginning of the battle." When did I ever say it was? 2 sentences down and neither of them are actually about anything I said to you :S "Still something: How much is better to kill aboriginals in Australia than to kill Armenians in Turkey?" So committing intentional Genocide at the state level is fine because the British local government in Australia let some of their colonists do bad things to the aborigines? I mean I'm certainly not going to defend the killings in the way you're desperately trying to use them to defend a genocide of the Armenians but there was no state intent to kill aborigines while the same is not true for the Ottomans. Also as a side note (not that it should matter but since you brought it up) Aborigines deaths where about 14,000, there are 812,000 today Armenian deaths where up to 1.5 Million and there are 10 Million ethnic Armenians today, so since this is the hill you seem so desperate to die on. Relative population killed - Armenians 15% compared to 1.7% of Aboriginals today (and of course over a much longer period for Australia) I'm not Australian or from New Zealand, but what you said doesn't in anyway change my original point, WW1 is what helped give these 2 countries a national identity and they where fighting entrenched Turks in pretty much the best defensive ground of the war and still managed to inflict roughly equal casualties on them which should be am embarrassment for the Turks who to be even slightly efficient had to be lead by the Germans

In my opinion the worst is volley fire formation.

@@longxiao9823 before wwi volley fire was very effective

@@Eccho3 Effective against another volley fire regiment, perhaps.

@@longxiao9823 for the doctrine of the time it was very effective against many formations, having the constant fire downrange that volley fire had was pretty decent Volleys could take down waves of charging troops, lines of troops, and various other formations

Tell that to the Ottoman army besieging Vienna in 17.century who then suddenly realises Jan Sobieski and his winged hussars at right their behind galloping their horses towards them lol. Peace out from Istanbul

In reality Turkish soldiers actually yelled out to the Anzac side to stop, shed tears after watching the massacare... At night after all the fighting was over Turkish soldiers prayed for the fallen Anzacs.

@@mr.tobacco1708 That's actually really honorable. Even enemies back then had enough humanity in them to realize that it wasn't personal and that bravery is a universally commendable quality

No one knew how to fight WW1

@@Copium6921 you’re absolutely right. Technology on the battlefield has evolved so quickly over the last century that it even overwhelms commanders today. Look at the $50 drones that make multi million dollar pieces of armor obsolete in Ukraine.

@@johndoran3274 I agree commanders did try things like digging under enemy trenches or heavy artillery barrages like at the Somme but often lack of heavy guns or trained crews would mean artillery barrages fail and men would end up charging intact trenches just like the Somme and i think even this battle

@@Copium6921 before I shipped out for Saudi Arabia back in 1990 for Desert Storm, I went to the American Legion with my father and grandfather for a drink. My grandfather was a tanker in WW11 and my father did 2 tours of duty in Vietnam. I sat next to a WW 1 vet and talked with him for hours. He was part of the Marine Expeditionary Force and fought in Belleau Wood. That conversation is burned into my brain as I could see the pain in him describing the horrible things he witnessed.

@@johndoran3274 One of my family members was a tanker in WW2 he fought at El Alamaine he was later captured by the Italians and suffered through horrendous conditions (the Italians hated the British because they were losing so badly) an old Italian lady gave the prisoners some bread so the Italians hung her outside the camp he said he was glad when they were given to the Germans he died a year after the war from something he caught in the prisoner of war camps another one of my family died a few weeks after Normandy he was shot by a German Sniper and drowned in his own blood war is very sad but young men will always want to fight

who?

@@grad3647 it was cold blooded murder sending those men out there. What did you think???

@@jacobklinger4830 I think he thought you were talking about the Turks

Yeah, it was directed at the officers who sent those men out. The Turks also suffered many needless losses in massed attacks into machine guns and artillery. That war was nothing but murder.

That's literally what they did but in a perfect line with muskets

This was really the first modern war that wasn't lines of people firing muskets or single shot rifles at each other where machine guns and other weapons were just being designed and fielded the people higher up were expecting it to be like every other war but it wasn't

That's what the naval barrage was for. To scatter the defenders allowing gaps for your infantry to assult. It worked at lone pine pretty well

To put it simply the Brits did not care for the Australians, if the 1000 died for that line on a map so be it. The British not wanting to lose their pwestige lost Hundreds of Thousands of lives.

​​​@@rexisnox577 strange this was an Australian officer commanding majority british troops then, and that british casualties at gallipoli far outweighed australian

yet he basically did nothing.

@@saiahr5463 except the fact that he maintained position of the machine gun soldiers even they were under heavy artillery and warship bombardment.

@@ersgtr3421 they didnt, during the bombardment they fell back for cover.

@@saiahr5463 yes but regained positions after each set of fire. The bombardment came with waves too.

@@ersgtr3421 the bombardment was non stop. thats why they got confused when it stopped 6 mins before they were supposed to go over.

There are many things wrong with that phase

@@samallen3564 Nice spelling...

Not exactly the commanders were also veterans its just this kind of warfare had never been seen before so no one knew what to do

I dont know ww2 was a mean bitxh as well.

Every war has its horrifying battles… There maybe was wars with more human carnage, but you really can’t compare wars like that.

he just did tho

WW2 was worse

@@jonathanbirch2022 personal opinion.

The vast majority of the ANZAC Forces were English or British born, with the rest being 2nd or 3rd generation British immigrants. The vast majority of losses at Gallipoli were by the British Army. The so called British aristocracy had a higher % of being killed then the average infantry men, especially as their sons were the junior officers leading the waves forward.

Ben bir türküm. Avustralyalı kahramanlara saygı duyuyorum ❤

Bravo sei buon osservatore😂😂

Surely keeps hapenning. Like in ukraine war. All wars are tragedys.