Interesting, thx for sharing 👍

The price is fair for what you get.

Premium sound, premium price. Too expensive for me. But such is life.

This has been done in pro audio forever, no new miracle of Trinnov.

@@wa2368well I think the idea is that this can be brought to the non pro. Now whether that’s easy for the lay person, let alone attainable for most HT enthusiasts is another story. Most of the time it still costs a small fortune and you need a pro to make the cals.

That's an incredibly long demo! Whoa! 😲

@@therealshanelee The demo movie we watched was 13 Hours🤣

Your 33's are ridiculous 🤯 shoot me an email I'll put you in touch shane@sparechangereviews.com

@@therealshanelee right on Shane I appreciate the reply!!!

It’s a Barco Freya.

@@therealshanelee With Freya MKII the US government regulations only allows up to 1.8 throws for the risk group 2 compared to up to 2.1 for the rest of the world, with the projectors otherwise risk group 3, I have not seen an installations yet with one of the new Nerthus projectors with more than double the brightness of a Freya +, Nerthus uses the larger 1.38 inch DMD, found in the Barco SP4K-B projectors compared to the compact 0.98 inch DMD found in SP4K-C projectors, with bigger chips better for larger screens where higher gain is required with less issues of visual RGB laser speckle to deal with when using a higher gain silver screen for passive 3D systems such as Real D. Harkness Screens has introduced their new Hugo SR 2.2+ screen at CinemaCon in 2024, which has been designed to mitigate speckle better than the previous generation screens such as Spectral, Clarus XC, PWT RealD (Precision White with Real D) and Nova. Nova has an ultra-high gain of 3.1 and has a very strong signal to noise ratio to be perfect for passive 3D in that it nearly totally eliminates the ghosting effects, only minor at the edges of the auditorium off axis, beyond the 22 degree half gain angle and its optical coating does help mitigate the speckle when using the RGB laser and brings an added optical clarity to the image.

It was a 50hz tone.

@@therealshanelee cheers for that, can you just KZfaq that ?? Or is it something specific

Usable space I think is 20ft deep, 10ft high, 17ft wide. There’s a false wall that’s a few ft deep and well as space around the remaining three walls for treatment.

@@therealshanelee Thanks!

Half wavelength distance steering is the same as Double Bass.

@@markym3870well then I’m really confused about exactly what this new technology is 😂

My understanding is that Waveforming is in a different league than Dirac A.R.T. I could be wrong though.

me too

I doubt the phones mic is gonna compete with a calibrated spl meter. We were checking for peaks and dips.

I used the same app as Shane last night at a concert and mine topped out at around 101 db, with an average of 94-95 within the space of a song. It was loud.

@@andreasmisundberntsen9237 I'll give the app another try!

amzn.to/4bF8DZu

Thanks!

Ideally your room will be treated to manage room modes in the 80-150 range as to allow you to cross over at 80 Hz for waveforming to work on the LFE-channel where directionality is inconsequential in a sealed room, and your satellites to play any directional cues above that point without massive modal issues. Otherwise you'll need to compromise your directional cues at low frequencies to ensure a more uniform response, and there's an argument for that being perceptually more important especially for movie soundtracks

@@TokeBoisen You still have spatial cues between 80 hz and 50 hz.

@@scottwheeler2679, I would be willing to bet you wouldn't be able to localize them in an enclosed space

@@TokeBoisen "them" being what? The spatial cues? I'd take that bet if the bet is I won't hear a difference in over all spatial presentation between full range stereo and stereo with mono summed up to 80 hz. I'll give you 50 hz but every expert I have spoken to on spatial audio says you will have audible spatial cues above 50 hz. or there abouts.

@@scottwheeler2679 maybe? Possibly more so in music recordings than film soundtracks, I suspect, though much of modern music mastering sum to mono below 80 Hz as far as I'm aware. I know that in controlled tests with test tones, there's some ability to distinguish direction in tones below 80 Hz, maybe down to 50, but with real-life content, and particularly in enclosed spaces, those become much harder to localize, and there's an argument that the improved linearity and uniformity of bass when summing and using things like waveforming are perceptually much more critical to the quality of sound

depends on the room. But It's at least 6 subs. 4 maybe in a very small room

@@scottwheeler2679ok thx, Scott. 6 can be managed. We are talking about a 3.6m x 5m room.

@@SN-kb1dl in such a room i think you can also do just 2+2, the more subs you have , the more effective it is. i have a similar room , 4mx5,2m , im doing 6+6

@@SN-kb1dl In that room you probably can get away with 4 subs

You are getting a promotion to be CEO of a global corporation then I presume... only way to afford this setup!

@@anone3842 No, just a Sr. Director role. I didn't say I was going to get the setup like in this video. I said I'm planning to get Trinnov processor and Ascendo speakers. There are different prices for Ascendo speakers.

Why does someone need a Ferrari? Why does someone need a Bentley?.Why does someone need an Mercedes Benz AMG S 65? Is the same reason someone would need this? Because they want it and can afford it 🤔

If you’ve got a big enough room and plenty of dollar, why not

@@justchilling4491 You must live in Chelsea London 🤔

It’s similar to Dirac art. To help reproducing tight bass, and tackle standing waves.