Ah yes, I hope it's ready to be verbally abused, reprimanded, and talked down to when it makes a mistake. And, to deal with lots of half started voice commands of "can you.. um.... can you um.... um... can you... umm.."

which means they won't use the feature at all because they hate other people

Put a mic and speaker in rubber duck

look up "talon voice," you can already do voice coding

AI could you delete that. Your listening to my neighbour. Oh no, wait. You were not supposed to delete that too

Ikr we got 4 code reports in such a small span

He may need AI copilot to keep up with the pace...

Good thing coming out if this is the fact that coders will have to find a job that is actually productive

You have no one to worship?

What does it cost us ...

Yes! He is either going to work himself into a comma or is using ChatGPT to help.

Its the exact opposite. Plenty of rest is being had while chatgpt is tasked with creating content.

Plot twist: he doesn't work anymore since all of his text video are made by AI tools

​@@philippebaillargeon5204 this may well be how it has been for a while now

Apple's Lightning port is still USB2 so if everything is changing at Lightning speed then it's still a 10th of the speed it could be by even today's standards (USB3).

think of it like this. Does Unreal engine frighten you? Does the msvs ide frighten you? Both radically increase your productivity. You can make something in an he in UE it would take you years to code by hand. AICoding is the same. I quit because codimg became just fighting 3 apis and burrowing through microsofts api bullshit and occasionally getting to do a tiny bit of actual innovative coding. AI will eliminate that drudgery

dont need an ai for the coding aspect of the game i'm just waiting for one that can make the models for me lol. once you've implemented the systems the biggest and hardest part of getting your game off the ground I find is the art, models, music etc.

Lower effort. Same cost :)

@@Levolpehh lol you Are a dreamer sir. Id just love to plug an ai into daz, maya poser or whatever and have it create animations for me!

@@cdreid9999 i saw one a while ago that could do objects like cars chairs beds n stuff. but humanoid models are a lot more complicated I guess.

Seconded

Coders are about to become minimum wage Amazon delivery guys

*Website

@@yendevus1747 sed reaaaality

The "AI Code Report"

Spoilers

Bill is not in microsoft

@@mnzrk but eating Microsoft money like cancer

That's how billionaires are made.

Helping him destroy your jobs

I'd also add: I don't think people realize that all this means is that the scale of the problems we focus on just level up. There's immensely complex shit still out there. This lets the IT industry go for those problems instead rather then a complete death of industry so the speak. This is when the wheat from the chaff gets seperated in my eyes.

Yes all these people say it's going to eat engineering jobs are wrong. It will eat your job to the extent that you're a mindless code monkey whose value is that you've memorized stuff. It won't eat anyone's job who actually thinks; they will just do higher level work because AI will do the lower level stuff.

@@thecodebrief Doing leetcode everyday might actually be beneficial for you in the long run than learning programming languages.

@@amateruss this is true, but I would advise to be competent in 1 language in each domain, web, systems, scripting.

In the future we will gather around and tell our grandkids we used to have a thing called electricity, which brought warmth and light in the homes we had, which were much nicer than the caves we need to hide in from the AI.

😂

Yeah i am guessing decades

No wonder Microsoft has been pushing TypeScript so hard.

Thats something I question... Is AI really AI???? what makes it intelligent???? is it not just human intelligence simulation? if it was truly intelligent, it would likely not need us :P might end up talking to the dolphins instead XD

🤣🤣🤣

import . comedy_module

you do relise this video was entierly made by an AI.

@@wantedsavage7776 😂😂😂

Yes

yet

Scooby-Doo!

Resistance is futile

Hit them where it hurts the most 😂

😮‍💨 as a linux user, i personally offented by it

loooool 😂 btw what's that song at the end?

They can only hire a security guy to review the code.

I see this as a signal that Cybersec will remain even stronger in this new AI era of coding. LOOOTS of bugs, exploits and shitty code made by AI and never questioned by lead coders or whoever is in charge. Shit, when the AI replaces almost completly human programmers and start making stale boring code, then as usual the clever black hat hackers will find creative exploits and flaws in AI design and code, and use it against it. I'll wild. I'll go to Cybersec definitely.

Literally was drinking tea when this line dropped; almost spat it out!

I want a new fckng OpenSource License, excluding AI to use my stuff for model building. Grrr.

Agreed, that ending was unexpectedly grim

The ending though.. They should sue microsoft...hahaha

When I saw Micro$$oft buying GitHub and killing Atom IDE while already having the most Gaming studios ...it already felt like the trailer of what's happening now.

My advice would be to be smart and stop worrying, learn how to use AI as a tool, it won't replace anyone anytime soon for complex systems. Hell, you're in a once in a lifetime opportunity, you're in the first generation of students being prepared in this new AI era, embrace it cause it's not going anywhere no matter which specialization you choose.

Backend programming cannot be replaced

Can you elaborate?

@@shkjuy6935 Well, some simple backends that are CRUD or based on CRUD can be. But sure, some super complex business logic gonna be safe for at least another decade or two.

that's not the right way to look at it. CS students of today will be developing the AI of the future. Keep that in mind.

imho its goimg to eliminate a LOT of "full stack webdevs" and dudes who sonehow got a job by taking a python course. It wont eliminate skilles programmers

We can create bigger and more complicated software. Work is never going to run out in this field.

@@kakkupoika i never got atound to coding in UE. Imagine telling ai "create code to make a character do x". Rather than a bunch of research reading you look at the code and think "OH..that's how this system works" I had ai write an imagecrawler for me and interated through a bunch to get what i wanted. In a lang im barely familiar with. And it selected different libraries for dif iterations. So rathet than spending 2 hrs researching img libs it picked 2 and displayed how to use them. I learned about those libraries and a lot more about the languagr in the time it would take to write the spider in c++ or another lang i already know

That's only if the workload stays the same. But realistically, if it becomes that much more efficient, people will be willing to code for less pay (since you'll be able to earn more anyway by working faster) which means demand will likely increase, which means more jobs.

They said check. The checkmate is yet to be delivered

hope some random ass dude working with linux his whole life gonna pop up with an gpl AI, superior to any propietary known to us. Will happen sooner or later

@@Filipcorobivblenderi well, there's stanford alpaca. in some senses, it already does that.

@@GraveUypo in what sense is that?

@@Filipcorobivblenderi Extremely unlikely since these companies are pouring billions but never say never I guess?

idk, some of the offline models are getting super powerful. I could see an offline copilot module being installed on the local off-grid server for sensitive projects.

so much cluelessness in ur comment, not sure where to start

I'm not that much worried. If the AI is so good to replace programmers at large scale then the jump towards replacing most other white collar jobs is not that far. because most of them only create some MS office documents or emails based on other documents. I don't know what happens then. We would need to rethink society

AI isnt a person whos going to gossip about your project. And if youre a big developer using another dev company like ms's ai you deserve what you get. You can run chatgpt 3.5 on a decent dev system. With a couple 4090s you should be able to run 4 locally

This last sentence was shocking indeed. OMG

Don't get overexcited. Your job is basically finished. Not sure if people realize it yet. Soon anyone with smart phone will be able to produce an app, web site, or whatever coding is required without having any knowledge about coding itself. So ...

@@DD-vm7fq Solution - buy microsoft stock - if you get replaced by ai, you get rich - if not, you can work to buy more microsoft stock

thousands and thousands of programmers will lose their jobs. Why a company owner will need a team of 10 developers if they can just hire only 1 to check the code? The rest will could not find a job again because all the other companies will think the same. That will create an spiral and you will have reduced your it workforce by 90% at least. How economy will move then if you retired all the people of the workforce who would by the company products anyways, if teh majority of people will not have money in the first place. This is just a nasty way to concentrate all the world economy in fewer hands, making 99% people in the world poorer and the 1% richer.

@@razorblade413 Concentrating wealth in that manner actually devalues it greatly. If nobody can afford to buy your shit, you lose value. The american business giants don't seem to realize this at all, and are constantly refusing to compensate their workers a living wage. This is highly unsustainable in the long run. and only acts to increase poverty and remove people's willingness to work inside the system. People will still work ofc, usually in the crime sector, and I don't mean as cops.

This post exemplifies why programmers are awful philosophers. They only care about the little widget in front of them and how to come closer to their 10X productivity ideal. They don't realize that the ice is quite thin underneath their feet. Which would be fine if it only impacted them. But it will destroy the whole economy and our current stable world order. Does technology necessarily lead to progress? Is productivity really what we need? Short-sighted.

With programming, this problem is diminished by the fact that you can test the program’s output (or just see compile errors) and know pretty quickly whether the model’s answer was correct.

It's not designed this way. It learns from humans, and there's a reason that people joke about nobody every admitting fault on the internet. Problem with the dataset, not the code.

using chatgpt is not like playing poker though, you can test the code and see if it actually works when in doubt. If you gamble you lose here

The worst is when it goes "oh shit you’re right! I’m stupid and wrong! Here’s the right answer” and gives exactly the same freaking answer

There are definitely overlays that go beyond just regurgitating internet responses. They’ve given it a personality which makes it lean toward particular response in certain situations. That’s why it will apologize WAY more often than actual people on the internet. Also, if it’s truly just re-wrapping answers, than it’s not all that different from a google search algorithm. It just does it in a very convoluted way, no pun intended. When you google search, you get an extremely curated answer on a webpage with pictures and other links. But GPTs are taking night take 20% from 1 webpage and 20% from 4 other webpages. The problem there is you’re mixing 5 blended answers send GPT isn’t giving you any of the sources. It’s like an average of the internet which is pretty stupid in my opinion. It works sometimes and for some cases like language and programming. But even then, I think it’s very small subsets of profaning use cases. The only reason Silicon Valley is laying off so many programmers is because they over hired when the stimulus money went straight to their bottom line and they thought it would keep going. So as soon as revenues have started to back off in 2023 they lay off all the people they hired in 2021-2022. I have not see programmers getting completely axed. I’ve also seen entire AI teams get fired at the companies I worked for because the predictive capabilities are not accurate enough for reliance as a model. It’s an average and a standard bell curve, not a predictive tool.

Programmers can't talk directly to customers that's why there is Agile, scrum, kanban etc

"Im sorry, as an AI model I can't blahblahblah fuck you, give me money"

Microsoft: An AI model's output only belongs to the user when that benefits us

Soon enough everything will be open source.

The nice thing about this is that there have been demonstrations that have shown that it's possible to actually steal an AI through data mining. Using the responses from chatgpt to train a new bot

@@voxelfusion9894 If there is an open source alternative to gpt4 (equivalent of stable diffusion for image generation), then perhaps yes. But if this tech stays in Microsoft's hands you'd better believe they won't release it until it's locked down enough to prevent software liberation. God forbid someone could use Excel without an Office365 subscription! The horror!! /s

It's easy to write code that passes tests; Ask any 1st year Comp Sci student.

@@kaydog890your comment is what we call a non-secutor.

I would do othervise

it can do it already, generating unit tests for a function or a class

@@simoroshka I will have to give it a try. Thanks!

Remember... this is "progress". A continuous state of stress to keep up with developments as our life's stability circles down the drain.

@@CJ-vs8ws Life was never stable in the first place, that was always an illusion

AI is recording these videos for him :)

you think AI isnt helping with this?

why do you need to comment about this, who cares, what a waste of space

no

no

My condolences

Its over for programmers

@@yendevus1747 are you a bot lol

I’m feeling this too. Started as a junior last year got laid off due to stock market and now junior jobs have been wiped out.

Do a project using Ai apis, try to stay relevant.

I still admire their aesthetic; remember how fascinated I was about their capabilities on their launch. So many actors in the 3D realms; it was a war in the PC space, but then you had these sacred monsters.

Was it a joke though?

Yeah… joke… uh… ha ha ha… 😭

That's what I'm saying. Regulators are really behind on all of this and something needs to be done from a legal standpoint.

It could easily be monopolized, and AI is not uncommon in the cyberpunk genre.

@@samuelbullard8978 Don't forget that DeepMind and OpenAI attended the Bilderberg meeting in 2022. The people who make moves in the world have already decided what our future holds and regulations are not on the docket.

I mean ... Artists have been screaming about this for 9 months now, but people really want their free pictures.

@@samuelbullard8978 They are being sued in a class action lawsuit. So hopefully, absent any new regulation, courts will rule that it already is against current copyright law.

I was a webdev/seo/coder for about 10 years. If i had chatgpt thrn it would have increased my productivity a hundredfold and id be xhstting to you from my yacht while models feed me wine

Hey Warren, cool lastname. Coding, refactoring, configuration are all steps that makes a developer who they are. A craftsmen in any field will be better with better tools. AI could be the tool that takes mundane tasks from our hands and allows us time to innovate and create better user experiences. The possibilities are there to be explored🤓🤓🤓🤓

AI will figure everything out on its own

For now. But that's where AGI comes in, where eventually AI can learn and understand things entirely independently, If GPT-4 really is "the beginning of human-level AI(/AGI)" like Microsoft believes it is, then it isn't far-fetched at all to think that someday soon AI will be able to do everything a human coder does, and more.

AI is not a tool, a tool that can think and analyze questions and responses are not tools. They are using same rational though process as human, thats why there is a field in AI called neural networks because applies the same process of connections just like a human brain. AI will not be only on programing world, you are not seeing the whole picture. These can be expanded to a lot of fields like medicine, arts, etc., REPLACING ALL THOSE PEOPLE FROM THEIR WORK.

Welcome to the age of systematic thinking

Soon plumbing will be replaced by Ai too. Imagine if ai can do programming then plumbing would be piece of cake for them

​@@ammadkhalid1857 robotic technology is nowhere near good enough to replace human plumbers

@@jextra1313 It will be easier to learn than ever before. Can the market sustain every white collar worker going into the trades? Doubt it. There would be so much competition that they would become low-paid skills.

@@ammadkhalid1857 Maybe the day a super articulated robot becames cheap, we will all by dead by then.

@@stoogel Go look at MITs most advanced robotics. They can hardly walk up stairs.

​@@infiniteloop7629 in the near future, the people which can think and solve problems by themselves will be rare. its time to learn how to use the tool, and not the opposite :)

@@infiniteloop7629 i wouldn't saying memorising shit, which has nothing to do with understanding and design, is 'intelligence'. but programmers are 99% glorified technicians and things should be designed in such a way that eliminates pointless timewasting. i wouldn't say AI copilot is a good idea over just designing things better.

People who used to do complex calculations by hand said the same about computers in the early days

It wont buiild nothing good if you dont instructed propertly, yo can have a scincetific calculator, but you will never use it propertly if you dont know math or physics

@@guillermomazzari4983 "it wont build..." You said it yourself, the thing does the building. Otherwise you would have said "you wont build"

probaby took him around 20 minutes, gpt4 writes his scripts

@@thebicycleman8062 No it doesn’t

We shall level up from shovels to excavators, letting us dig ourselves an even deeper hole! it's brilliant

Not far when ai makes us their slaves. Or AI war 1 happens.

Yes u

Yes, you're spot on. Meanwhile everyone else is crying about software developers losing their jobs. Smh.

Since copilot-x is leveraging gpt4, and gpt4 is purported to have a 90% accuracy rate, that's going to be pretty damn good. And it's all just going to get better. A year from now, it might be at 99% accuracy. Coupled with having it write unit testing to cover happy paths, edge cases, and corner cases, it has the strong potential to be better than the best human engineer.

have you tried gpt4? Its not perfect but its an order of magnitude smarter than copilot. How good will it be in a year, 5 years, 10 years?

@@pvanukoff I've tried it. Do not believe the hype. GPT-4 is just as if GPT-3 had half a brain, but also costed enough that you can't even justify using it at all. It still lies, makes bad assumptions, writes garbage code, and BSes it's way though more complex questions, just slightly less. Try it on a novel CS-related program in any language with little code samples, yet plenty of docs, and you'd see the real state of its abilities to generalize.

"But just like if I hired a coding assistant, I have to double check everything it does": the problem is the coding assistant won't be hired in many cases. People might not lose the jobs they have now, but entry level positions and internships can become rarer (they already are rare tbh). The demand for seniors and specialists is high, and what basically happens is a senior moving to another company., which opens a senior position at his previous company and so on... This happens already and might become worse. Todays assistant might be the next senior dev, but he wouldn't ever be a dev without an entry point. The market will have an even bigger lack of professionals (and maybe when it's no longer sustainable they could start giving people first chances again, though by then AI might be more than just an assistant or copilot)

Yeah, this is exactly how I see it. There are so many underserved segments of society that could benefit from good software. AI will enable good developers to build all that software so much more efficiently.

This is not a benefit. I cant believe people think in short term. If all companies are starting to rely on AI they will not need developers (or other kind of employees in the near future), maybe one just for checking AI generated code. All those thousands will be unemployed, so in what jobs will you put all those unemployed people? Did you think about that? And this will not stayed in the it world, this will be expanded in other areas like lawers or in medicine world, artist, etc. Where those future replaced people would work again?

Also this will increase the poverty in a brutal way in the world. And finally the economy will collapse on itself, because if all companies uses AI and not hire people, so there will be no people to buy their products. This is just a massive concentration of the economy on the big companies of the world and the rest of people will be poorer than ever before.

​@@razorblade413 If I run a company and I can fire 9 of my 10 coders, saving me a lot of money, or keep all 10 coders and do 10x as much with them, making me way more money, which will I choose? Obviously the latter.

@@ThePallidor If all companies think like you, it would be awesome. Sadly reality is not like that. If a company owner knows a better way to make big money by spending the least the will take that route. Remember that small or medium size company have tight budget they cant spend money the dont have like crazy. Just look at the bank crisis of SVB, a lot of startups will be broke in no time. The time for "endless money" is over, nor twitter nor even other companies will spend money like crazy on luxury breakfast, recreation zones, etc. This happens now amazon fired out a lot of people, same twitter, same facebook, etc. Because money is not endless, especially in crisis times like now.

He does actually, but not AI, kinda

Did someone say Trackmania?

I think you meant to say BLAZINGLY FAST

Godspeed spider man

All programmers are gonna have to apply at their local McDonalds for a job

So Google must be Reverse Flash... I know, what a terrible joke... have a great day!

Well- I'd understand they want to exclude the bad code from their training data.

This ^

public domain and let the community develop

Now if only the massive companies started giving a single fuck about licenses before using other people's clearly GPLv3 licensed work to train their AI models 🙃

Since the dawn of humanity, people has been trying to buy low and sell high. That's not greed, that's common sense, and is the basis (and the only one possible) of modern society, with all its good and bad things. Open source is not about forcing people to work for free, it's about having the choice and voluntarily taking it.

@@MrTomyCJ what you're describing is the market system. Indeed, it's not being greedy to self-maximize, it's just being part of what is required from the rules of that system. But with the advent of automation markets are becoming quickly obsolete. At some point, when everything is automated, you can't just expect repurpose of the entire population, because there will be nothing to repurpose into for the vast majority. We either end up in a dystopic corporate overlord techno-fascim, or break-up every non-democratic power structure and fully democratize the economy.

People who've been render farming must be pretty excited about LLaMa

Don't worry. You only have access to this "tool" to further train it so it can completely replace you independently.

These tools also stop working for sanctioned countries btw so basically it's politicized

@@DarkzarichV2 One of the only benefits, which is easily avoided though.

Why take penicilin? Its not great to become "dependant" on something that is rendered useless as soon as theres a supply issue.

Considering how fast this video came out, it's in the realm of possibility

The problem is that we won’t be, only those with wealth and influence currently will be. Remove the need for a work force and you also remove the need to maintain one.

If it kills the sh_t-pile that is react I'll happily become unemployed. Worst syntax I've ever seen on a screen.

Ai finally passed the turing test.

This is the first time a chatgpt response convinced me that it was from a human

What was the prompt? If there was a prompt since it looks very specific

"Underwater basket weaving" Chat GPT confirmed 4chan user?

makes you wonder: did you use chatgpt or did chatgpt used you?

Why would it be a massive setback ?

you mean they use free codes and add a monthly fee for copilot?

I think that coding for faster and cheaper will ultimately be a boom for free software.

😂

As long as it doesn't just copy-paste code, then I don't see the problem with it, I won't feel like it's stealing code from other people. It will become capable (if it's not already, idk) of abstracting all the code it was fed from to the point of not knowing at all how it used to look.

Brutal but true

to be honest i feel like ai would make me lazy

Brutaaaal

@@sussyimposter7224 that is the point of AI in the long run isnt it?

@@cyberstonks but if i become lazy i will become even more stupid than i already am

The problem is that it would still probably have a reduction in headcount.

I think in a few years AI will be able to create entire web apps from scratch like a full stack developer

There's more to the dev landscape than senior consultants. In the spirit of companies being "lean", people's livelihoods are gonna be destroyed way faster than they can adapt.

Yeah, ONE maintenance engineer. The rest of the team gets fucked

@@Krasin_ It's going to cut out the chaff, programmers that know how to use co-pilot to improve their productivity and make coherent code will be more valued.

so basically developers

@@gabrielpauna62 Only those who can distinguish between a bloated and lean solution. Situational requirements are different from generic solution. Programmers are now going to earn more than ever (1st point).

Something often ignored as well is how things like Alexa helps people with disabilities do day to day tasks.

voice assistants are totally useless for me except for setting timers when cooking. but I agree that in terms of accesibility they can be life-changing and most of the time ignored, so I applaud their take on voice-assisted programming peer.

Yerp.. I am a coder and my RSI / Ulnar Tunnel gets very bad at times making it impossible to use a mouse or keyboard. I've gotten by with an eye tracker and talon voice so far.. But ChatGPT has made this all way easier for me. I can just tell it what I need in plain English through voice / dictation. Integrating it into the editor will make it even better (for me).

@@pilercodes i see you use a regular keyboard, I highly recommend you to try ergo/ortho/split/tented ones and wrist pads if you haven't

@@knoopx I have a Moonlander (split programmable keyboard) as well as a normal keyboard. Still getting used to the Moonlander so it's not my daily driver yet, but it also still do have pain while using it. So, I mostly just use a hybrid approach now where I use voice for repetitive things, chatting, copy paste, etc, and keyboard when needed / easier depending what I'm working on. But when my arms are really acting up, I will learn more toward voice / dictation with the help of ChatGPT, rather than using a keyboard. The eye tracker also helps a ton vs using a mouse.

yes! talent. and talent comes from hard work right?!?! enjoy studying 10 hours a day! especially when you already have a job! gime a break man. i've been a front end dev for 2 years. the game is about to change

Ignore Bobby; He's having a breakdown. AI will most certainly replace news reporting. The only thing it can't do(yet) is make decisions.

Are you sure this is not an AI generated report? 😏

Like TPS reports?

You sure?

Just have Chat GPT-8 write you the code to turn a Roomba into a weed eating machine. 😄