same here.. it did work in the beginning :(

@@vandereclame2898 Same here, I think it has to do with changes in photoshop?

Unfortunately in the latest psd beta this feature is no longer available. However it is available in the current Psd version

No problem! Glad I could help 😊

Nice one!

Awesome, glad I could help. Hope it goes well!

Thank you, glad you found it helpful 😊

Awesome Tip! Will have to give it a try.

I hope so too!

No worries, glad it helped😊

@eurossocial the great thing about Photoshop is that you can apply this effect so that it distorts your original image instead of replacing it. There are lots of Ai tools out there but results might differ from your original image or requires complex prompts to achieve the same effect. My favourite Ai image generator at the moment is leonardo.ai :)

No problem 😊

No worries!

Thanks for watching, glad you found it helpful! Think of channels as a mask, so the whiter your channel (100% brightness) the more it is going to apply the generative fill layer and distort your image. The darker it is the less it will affect your image (0%B). So that’s why 30%B seems to be the sweet spot in the middle. Same concept applies for any colour space you are using. Hope this helps!

@@Studio.Shephrd Oh yep of course! (and awesome!) thanks heaps 🤩🙌🧡

I know! Such an amazing tool!

Thank you! You can give it a go, however I haven't had great results with faces yet as things become distorted. Hopefully we should see this improve as Adobe develops this tool.

You’re welcome 😊

Very exciting!

Update: it works!! I was trying it on the new beta version and for some reason it doesn’t work there. But the regular photoshop it works. Results are amazing!!!!! Thank you so much!

@@xsharkzones2840 How did you get this to work? The regular Photoshop doesn't have generative fill I thought

Hey, sorry to hear you’re having troubles. Different images will get various results. I found images with white or light backgrounds worked better. But overall following these steps should produce similar results. Maybe try with a similar image to start and see how you go. Hopefully as Adobe develops this tool it will become even better in the future! Hope this helps 😊

how to make a generative fill button immediately without selecting objects?@@Studio.Shephrd

@@Studio.ShephrdCould those problems possibly caused by the current resolution limits of the beta?

For best results with the drawing prompts, try with images similar to mine with a white background and inanimate objects. You can also be more descriptive with the prompt to get better outcomes such as 'marker pen drawing' 'marker pen sketch' 'scribble sketch with marker pens' etc. Hope this helps :)

@@Studio.Shephrd alright sounds good 👍

Try asking chat gpt for a list of prompts for your theme! Something like “write me 10 image prompts for ‘1980’s hand painted movie posters’.” Might be too specific but worth a try. Something simpler like ‘vintage painting’ might work better 😊

Nice one! Happy to help 😊

Hey, sorry to hear you’re having problems. At what step are you having trouble?

Hey, not that I know of at this stage unfortunately. Each time you generate it creates a new unique effect so your best chance would be to keep generating until you get one similar.

Hey @sergeyafanasiev3896, not at this stage as each variation is unique.

Try it on a regular photoshop, i've tried just now with the (regular) photoshop 25.9 and it worked just fine! although you may think it does not have an AI generative fill, it indeed does have it.

Hi, hard for me to tell without seeing or knowing more. I would say most important step is the transparent masking stage which affects the final outcome. Check this video out that uses a different approach to do the same thing - hopefully you have better results kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g5ifatRp3d-2gaM.htmlsi=lXAoVCJAnq6ZTg9A

Thank you for your constructive reply- I will check it out. I appreciate you taking the time!@@Studio.Shephrd

Thanks @rolandrickphotography, using channels is one of the tricks I have seen circulating the design community. Basically all you're wanting to do is create a transparent selection so generative fill blends with your image rather than replacing it. I have added the link to the image in the video description now :)

@@Studio.Shephrd Thank you so much 😊🙏

@@Studio.Shephrd I did that now with an image of mine, doesn't work at all. Not even close. Posting links is unfortunately no longer possible on YT, the comments got deleted. Can I use an e-mail address to send you a WeTransfer link?

@@rolandrickphotography Link to the image is in the video description, still available there

@@Studio.Shephrd Yes, thanks. I meant I can’t post a link here to my image which doesn’t work with that method. Sorry if I wrote that unclear.

@samikuza thank you 🙂 Not that I know of, at this stage it's just being descriptive about what you want and a bit of trial and error.

Basically all you're doing is creating a transparent selection so generative fill blends with your image rather than replacing it. This can also be done with quick masks using the same 30%B colour fill in your mask. I use that technique in this next tutorial for reference kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fLaqlsR6zKjMdKM.htmlsi=XpV3ZGxBu02sC4se&t=59 Thanks for watching!

@@Studio.Shephrd thanks for the explanation

So basically when you create a channel with 30% brightness you could think of it being 30% transparent, so even though it doesn’t show anything as selected you actually have your 30% grey channel selected. This helps the generative fill tool blend the two layers better. Hope that answers your question 😊

Try starting with the prompt oil painting, this seems to be the most consistent across all images. Some prompts don’t seem to work as well on certain images so it requires a bit or trial and error. Hope this helps.

Try it on a regular photoshop, i've tried just now with the (regular) photoshop 25.9 and it worked just fine! although you may think it does not have an AI generative fill, it indeed does have it.

Hey, make sure you’re applying to the correct channel and have the foreground colour selected before you fill. Watch the video again and check you haven’t missed any steps.

Hi, not familiar with Photopea but I don’t believe so. These are unique tools to Adobe Photoshop

@drfunk1986 sorry to hear you’re having issues. If you haven’t already check out this other video of mine that uses quick masks instead of channels to create the same effect. Turn any image into water color art: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g5ifatRp3d-2gaM.htmlsi=9It6k0jy-obeTYeS Hope this helps

Yes should still work with faces, but might not be as effective as it would cause a bit of distortion so can get some odd looking results. Check out my latest video to see one way to use generative fill on portraits. Thanks for watching!

Thanks for the tip! You’re right, I’ve seen people use that method too, both work just as well 😊

¿Cómo sería eso?

how would that be?

@ Press Q (to enter quick mask mode). Fill with 30% grey. Press Q again to exit.

I have a new video dropping tomorrow using that alternative technique so be sure to check that one out!

The effect will react different with different images. Make sure to follow all the steps and play around with variations until you get the right look :)

Hey, potentially you have a quick mask open or in the wrong channel. If you're in a quick mask the red shows what area is selected, you can toggle out of quick masks by clicking 'Q'. If you're having trouble with this method I'd recommend watching this video which uses quick masks instead of channels to create a transparent selection. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g5ifatRp3d-2gaM.htmlsi=yNkehE_A51wfNfIT Hope this helps :)

@Artlantida Thanks!

Hey, yes generative fill is still available in Photoshop :)

@@Studio.Shephrd thanks Yes i found it later on today :)

😂

Hopefully not, but imagine there will be some extra subscription costs to cover the expense of running AI..

I haven’t tried! But by all means give it a go and report back. I would assume it wouldn’t be as effective in producing realistic images as it is at producing textured ones.

Listed at the end of the video :)

Try generate more variations if there aren’t any to your liking. Click generate again and it will create 3 more variations to choose from. And if you still aren’t successful then try with some alternative images and they might work better 😊 Hope this helps

If you’re looking to create pixel art maybe check out my other video ‘convert image to pixel art’ in illustrator😊

Hey @k-Sal, make sure not to skip this step here 00:50, this will reduce the intensity of the generative fill so it will show more of your image! If you have followed all the steps then maybe try it on a different image and see if it makes a difference.

New Zealand 😊

ok it's close@@Studio.Shephrd

Hey, sorry to hear it’s not working well for you. All images react differently to the prompts, as this is still in beta we should hopefully see this improve in later updates but for now it’s very much experimental. Have a play with other prompts and you could try being even more descriptive than I have for various results. Hope this helps:)

What if you have no budget tho?

Thanks @UC-Music, I think this will never replace artists as originality and human expression can never be replicated artificially. However this is a fantastic new tool that offers new opportunities for designers to be creative.

Hey, at this stage it is very much experimental but there are a lot of great uses for it already. I’ve had some good results on portraits but just with certain prompts as you’re right it definitely struggles with faces. But as this is only Beta it’s a pretty good start and exciting to see how this will develop.

Hey there, what’s not working?

@stephenschildbach940 I understand with the rapid rise of Ai it can be daunting for artists who worry about being replaced. But I think Ai is merely a tool to enhance artistic processes, and you will see new artists emerge who use various Ai tools to create unique work. However the essence of art, being personal expression and exploration of different media will always hold value and will not be replaced.

​@@Studio.Shephrd I won't deny that AI could be occasionally used to "enhance the artistic process", but unfortunately it will be predominantly used by people who are "takers" not wanting to work for anything or not not wanting to pay anyone for for a skill that not many people can do without years of training. It creates a society that thinks they can get any creative result they want without putting any effort or supporting a creative person. Using AI merely produces a dopamine hit for the button pusher, missing the whole point of making art in the first place-it is a human creative process. Not to mention art is fun! And, why would you have a computer do something for you that was so enjoyable and fulfilling? There is no doubt in my mind that AI applied to "making art" is a huge negative sum loss that harms society and artists. AI is anti-human.