Filipe Avelino yes, in that period of time mankind had the Avengers in the flesh. Just look at any one of the pics they took at the Solvay Congress: any student of chemistry has read at least 80% of the names of those portraited. Amazing times!

@@DonatoColangelo Yes true but not to underestimate modern non famous scientists. From preparing a vaccine within the span of a year to creating reusable rockets, the science world has achieved marvels. But our next focus should now be on finding ways to conserve ecosystem and to some effect reverse the two long term problems:Too many people, Too few trees

@@jayantbhatt1977 totally agree with you. I was not comparing any generations of scientists even though from my words one might think I am implying that Solvay’s minds were superior in any case. But there is no denying those minds changed the view we had of the cosmos and of reality. Yes, we have tough moments ahead and I am the first to wait the man (the woman better still) which will open the way for a better future. Full respect for the minds we have today.

Don't forget Galileo

And Newton

Director didn't want to waste 2 hours of screen time on the actors actually reading the equations

Lol, what a dumb statement

@@neuroticdisneyprincess7502 Lol.

Yeah sure, but in my opinion Newton was a greater genius than Einstein! Far greater!

@@oscarahlke1585 Shoulders of giants and all that - however - Newtonian physics have taken a beating since the discovery of quantum mechanics.

* Indirect quote

I thought about this And we can slow down the time easily

Herr Thanksgiving ... it’s humorous !!!

Herr Thanksgiving... get the *fuck* out of my class!

That’s ok, I guess as position is relative too 😆

@@brahimilyes681 Close your eyes. Pretend I'm not here

@@goalingkungfu Lmaooo good one

LOL

Yes and I like it

Welcome to the paradigm shift bud

It’s all a plan

Not me.

No one asked, literally this time

@@sajivfx6313 who hurt you man, you wanna fight?

@@negativepunk9638 seems like u wanna fight. who hurt u? he was making a joke y u being so confrontational

@@frankdimeglio8216 gee ok man

@@WhiteDeviluke FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

he's gadda pay the bills got a wife and family to boot so maybe someday science can be a career with money and grants even dare I say.

Lol

😂 Bruh

He was already a physicist lol, he only worked at a patent office for his family needs

His grandpa used to say the same. 😂

Yeah 😂

lol

Lol

Max Planck?...That name sounds too familiar, is it one of the best physicist and mathematicians?

@@loop5720 Ever heard of Planck’s constant?

Ahahahaha this is sadly true!!

As a movie,you have to keep it short and entertaining so I get why they did that. In reality it is much harder,but they made this movie pretty well and explain it good too so I won't complain

yeah like archimedes eurika moment he not jump in bath and finally eureka its a long process

Actually Einstein did make all these discoveries in Physics in the time frame shown in the show. There's a reason he's the most popular scientist of our era.

@@siddharthshrivastava1399 but he didn’t prance on their doorstep and tell them to close their eyes and imagine they’re on a train and elicited an immediate “OH MY GOD YOU FIGURED IT OUT YOU GENIUS.” I’m sure that was a part of Einstein’s discussion and lecture, but it was far less energizing, and far more mathematical. No one looked at that paper and said that it was genius within minutes. They took it home and studied the paper over days.

Bruh😂

Odin be like 👀

omg. this cracked me up 🤣

UNDERSTANDING TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE): The following explains why and how what is THE EARTH/ground is necessarily (AND CLEARLY) the FULL DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE (ON BALANCE). INSTANTaneity is fundamental to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). Carefully consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) that actually IS IN what is outer “space“. Carefully consider what is the man (AND what is THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. (SO, carefully consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE.) Consider what is the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE. Indeed, touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); as TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. I have explained why THE PLANETS (including the Moon) move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun, AND I have explained the cosmological redshift. I have explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !! (Einstein never nearly understood gravity, TIME, or time dilation ON BALANCE.) THINK. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND balanced IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting; as Einstein's equations are NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE). Therefore, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or balanced with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". Great. Therefore, the ULTIMATE BASIS of SPACE AND TIME is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETISM AND GRAVITY in balance; as PERPETUAL motion is the ultimate answer to what is then TIME DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to TIME AND SPACE. Accordingly, the relative end(s) of SPACE AND TIME are thus understood to involve gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy in balance. Balance and completeness go hand in hand. TIME dilation ultimately proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity on balance, as the EYE is the size of a black hole in BALANCED RELATION to what is the EARTH; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. (Consider what is the Sun on balance.) Time is (NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY) proven to be possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Consider what is the man (the eye) that actually IS in outer “space” ON BALANCE. AGAIN, TIME dilation ultimately proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity on balance. NOW, consider what is the man (AND THE EYE) who actually IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

I see So you're a man of culture.

@@sheikharafahammed6242 FUNDAMENTALLY UNDERSTANDING SPACE AND TIME IN RELATION TO WHAT IS PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE: BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Consider what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !! THINK ABOUT TIME ON BALANCE. GREAT. ❤️ What is called philosophy is absolutely essential regarding what is physics/physical experience. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground. Now, consider what is THE EYE (ON BALANCE). LOOK UP at what is the TRANSLUCENT BLUE SKY !! NOW, ON BALANCE, consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON AND what is the orange (AND setting) Sun IN DIRECT comparison WITH what is THE EYE !!! Now, think about LAVA; AS WHAT IS THE MOON is about one quarter of the size of what is THE EARTH (ON BALANCE) !!! E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Again, carefully consider what is the man (AND THE EYE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground; AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! The density of what is the Sun IS about one quarter that of what is THE EARTH ON BALANCE !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio Since gravity cannot be shielded (or blocked), it has to be fundamentally BALANCED with (or equivalent to) what is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy regarding what is invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. c squared CLEARLY and necessarily represents balanced acceleration---a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE in relation to what are E AND "m" (ON BALANCE !!). Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Hence, what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE is (CLEARLY) invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE AND what is the BLUE SKY (ON BALANCE). ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS THE COMPARATIVE AND BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MAN WHO IS STANDING ON WHAT IS THE MOON: The BULK DENSITY of the Moon is comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about three times that of water. SO, now, get a good and CLEAR look at what is the ORANGE SUN. The human body is, in fact, about as dense as water ! Look up at the blue sky. Importantly, this is a balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE !! The Moon is ALSO BLUE, AS it is barely visible then; AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE. SO, let's now match up (on balance) the eye, the blue sky, AND the ORANGE "Sun"/LAVA. Notice the basic match in sizes and brightness when considering the SETTING AND fully illuminated Moon AS WELL. (Most of the human body is water, with an average of roughly 60 percent. The average density of the Moon is also 60 percent in comparison with that of the Earth.) Beautiful. Relatively speaking, the terrestrial moon is, in fact, roughly a match (regarding it's size, at 27 percent) WITH the surface land area of the Earth (at 29 percent). In conclusion, in establishing the comparative AND BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of gravity on what is the Moon, we would multiply one HALF times one third in order to get the correct answer. This explains quantum gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Great. Consider the relation with the tides. The Moon is ALSO BLUE. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. In conclusion, I have mathematically proven that the gravity of what is THE MOON is ONE SIXTH in direct comparison with what is THE EARTH/ground; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/energy IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!! Think energy DENSITY. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. The ENERGY DENSITY of LAVA is about THREE TIMES greater than water. There would be no gravity on the blue Earth, AS the EYE then stands in balanced relation WITH what is the BLUE sky !! BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE does then dictate that the gravity of WHAT IS THE MOON would be reduced by (and at) one half, thereby bringing the surface gravity of what is THE MOON to BALANCE with that of THE EARTH/ground at one sixth. So, one half (ON BALANCE) of one third is one sixth. The orange "Sun" AND what is THE MOON ARE BALANCED with what is THE EYE. (Think about what is LAVA.) Notice, comparatively, that these forms or manifestations ARE semi-detached in relation to touch/tactical EXPERIENCE !! Moreover, the Moon is TERRESTRIAL in COMPARISON; SO (ON BALANCE) the Moon is ALSO then about one quarter (at 27 percent) the size of EARTH/ground !! The blue Pacific OCEAN takes up about HALF of the view of what is the Earth ON BALANCE !! SO, we WOULD multiply ONE HALF (ON BALANCE) in order to account for WHAT IS THE MOON, this ORANGE "Sun", AND LAVA on balance !! Now, in conclusion, the land surface area of the Earth is 29 percent. This is exactly ON BALANCE WITH BOTH one third AND one fourth, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE ! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

Use Sophia robot artificial intelligence So we know how to write a paper for good grades ?

true lol. i spent a whole damn week to understand just the basics of that relativity

well he was prob familiar with some things on that paper lol

he didn't read the entire paper, only the part how einstein derived e=mc²

@@chereipeach345 Here is true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY. Gravity is fundamental. It cannot be shielded (or blocked). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON/IN BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. Carefully consider what is THE MOON. The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electroMAGNETIC/gravitational ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. Great. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE !! Carefully consider WHAT IS the Sun ON BALANCE !! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great !!! By Frank DiMeglio

obviously

PogU

@@vikraal6974 PagChomp

@@emperoromulus3054 poggu or baskpog wutface monkaS

lol

Why is it simple to imagine? Why would the guy who does not yet know how light or time actually works yet, because Einstein hasn’t told him, I be able to imagine a world in which it’s clear physics works the way Einstein is describing it before he even says anything lol. This is a useless scene that wasn’t even well thought out.

Lmao

Yajeer Salposial Newton: Herr Einstein, you didn’t have to do me dirty like that bruh!

Nah, in heaven, bohl and einstein is still debating about quantum mechanics and general relativity, while aristotle and newton sit at one corner still trying to figure out wtf is goin on XD

@@elpacificador2852 Thank you

@@elpacificador2852 Thank you

😂

Hey Al, Saw your brain hanging on a museum yesterday. It looks horrible

@@pabloescober9076 Looks horrible but I bet its still smarter than 75% of the world right now lmao

@@bsballer11 guess you are right😂😂😂

@albert Einstein then where's the real one

@@alberteinstein6931 ha😆👍

your mum is absolute

@@zilytra gotem

BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental regarding physics/physical experience. There aren't any differences regarding TIME dilation and gravitational time dilation when you realize that F=ma AND E=mc2 prove ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. This explains or proves the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations (along WITH TIME ON BALANCE). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Great. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE on balance, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. GREAT. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EARTH is blue, AND the sky is ALSO BLUE. By Frank DiMeglio The easiest and the fundamental derivation of E=mc2 is as F=ma. This represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is a two dimensional surface OR SPACE on AVERAGE (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). TIME dilation ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (on balance), as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Get a good LOOK at what is the physical structure of what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Great. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are (CLEARLY) linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE), as TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. By Frank DiMeglio

@@yeetthebeet E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS one, TWO, AND three dimensional SPACE are (CLEARLY) in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AS this CLEARLY explains or proves WHAT IS the fourth dimension (ON BALANCE); AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. GREAT !!!! Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is THE EYE AND the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Notice the orange AND setting Sun. E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, I have mathematically unified physics. By Frank DiMeglio

😄

Not funny

shadwal akhouri hahaha I was thinking the exact same thing xD

He read the play before kkk

Einstein

Geniuses prove equations.

@@soumyaneelmukherjee11b58 yes u are right!

He actually made A LOT of fails.

@@cadizenjoyer Yeah ik I just wanted to make a joke about how smart he was when he was at this stage of his life

@@cadizenjoyernot really before he made a name for himself.

Wow good job! that's indeed what they said! Oh how i wish i had ears

I'm number one now. I am way smarter than the weasel Einstein. Newton ranks second. Here's why. THE THEORETICAL, TOP DOWN, CLEAR, AND UNIVERSAL BALANCING OF E=MC2 AS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, time DILATION proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) I have mathematically unified and BALANCED physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 is necessarily AND CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. Great. It is CLEARLY AND FULLY proven in what is a BALANCED fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. In fact, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEARLY proven. It is a very great truth in physics that the ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) INDEED, E=mc2 IS DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS time dilation proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider the man who is standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. SO, the mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) proves that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Look UP at what is the BLUE SKY. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, the PLANETS (including what is THE MOON) are understood to move away very, very, very, very slightly. Stellar clustering proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Indeed, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!!! Great !!!! By Frank DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 how can we believe you

@@lemus6984 WHERE EINSTEIN WENT WRONG REGARDING WHAT IS BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity: Boris Stoyanov is a super bright and an HONEST physicist. He has agreed that the following paragraph (and I quote) is "crystal clear": "ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Accordingly, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is balanced ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity IS electromagnetism/energy. That objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course) PROVES that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about it." Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. Get a good look at what is THE EYE. Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!! By Frank DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 gravitational charge is energy, however it is not a part of the electromagnetic spectrum since an electromagnetic field doesn't carry charge.

I'm Nobody

Like Lisa Simpson

If you make your own question and solve it. You are making yourself genius. From my experience.

@@inamdarsaquib9528 so you’re a genius? Tell me, genius, what question have you asked yourself and what was the answer you provided so that we may make a movie about you and the world shall know the fruits of your ingenious labor.

@@eddie1975utube Einstein answered a question essential to, well, everything. Special relativity tore up al that had been accepted since Newton. There was a reason it was a question that nobody was asking, because it took a man of his genius to realise accepted convention was wrong, secondly he had the genius to prove it. E=MC2 is essential to almost all that we think we know. Without this simple formula the potential for atomic/nuclear weapons or energy. To suggest it is ego is preposterous

actually it's the story of every curious people in the world

I get that from what I perceive as "smart people, " they often ask me this. For, I, as well, does not know what the hell I am babbling on about.

Einstein has been reinvented by politically correct people like Brian Greene 💰.

TIME DILATION IS FULLY EXPLAINED, AS THE ULTIMATE MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS CLEARLY PROVEN: A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) Time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, as C4 is a POINT that is ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (ON BALANCE) as SPACE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. E=mc2 IS F=ma. A planet AND a star thus constitute what is A POINT in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ACCORDINGLY, I have ALSO fully explained the MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION of Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations (GIVEN THE ADDITION OF A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The Sun AND the Earth are F=ma AND E=mc2. Great. SO, ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. AGAIN, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great. Indeed, this NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. (E=mc2 IS F=ma.) Therefore, INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=MA, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=mc2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=MC2 IS F=ma. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Magnificent !!! By Frank DiMeglio

Newton would have laughed in Einstein's face. Einstein never would have gone in the greedy direction that he went with Newton there.

@@frankdimeglio8216 Who even are you deadass? Mans insulting one of the greatest physicists of all time with some bs that he barely explains.

Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It is absolutely impossible to separate gravity, inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. By Frank DiMeglio

@@retixgaming8775 THE THEORETICAL, TOP DOWN, CLEAR, SIMPLE, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA OF NECESSITY: Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Very importantly, outer “space” involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. NOW, carefully consider what is THE SUN; AS it does (and it must) exist in both time AND SPACE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!!! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Carefully consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! Carefully consider what is THE EYE. GREAT. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This CLEARLY explains the cosmological redshift AND the black hole(s) !!! AGAIN, gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!! Great. By Frank DiMeglio

omggg

no it should be lighter

LMAO

Yea fellow physics boi

if thats level 100 the level 1 should be level -100

@@birdsayshello why so?

A) It's a movie, getting the point across in a short time (unless its LotR) is important. B) I have to read Ikea instructions four or five times but then I'm no scientist, but if I were I think I'd get the gist quite quickly.

He might have just looked into the final "boxed" formula...

@Ashutosh Gurao who doesn't? But even missing out Beorn and Gan Buri Gan you gotta admit it goes in a bit

Also his paper was a one-page draft of random equations😂😂😂

I didn't quite get that, would you be so kind to explain this to a lowly peasant?

@@shinnightwood1971 In the late 1800s, James Maxwell managed to develop 4 equations that explained everything involving fields (such as electromagnetism, and gravity). Newton, on the other hand, came up with calculus, the gravitational laws, and his work is pretty much the entire basis for physics as a whole. When he said that Newton got it in the eyes, he meant that it wasn't just a discovery into a new piece of physics; like Maxwell did. The discovery of General and Special Relativity were such monumental discoveries that they uprooted pretty much everything in physics up to that point. And since every area of physics is built on top of Newton's Laws, it shook what we knew in pretty much every aspect of physics, and the universe as a whole. (aside from Quantum Mechanics... it still doesn't wanna play nice with General Relativity; and it's still one of the most important fields of study we're working on to this day!)

@@iliketrains0pwned Just waiting for the day when there's a new discovery that explains a relationship between quantum (small) macro and quantum (large).

@@MintRobin Token physicist wannabe comment

@@haidar6280 ?

*bad jokes

@@payal3428 i really needed someone to fix it 🙂🤞

People liked the "Our bomb will produce so much energy" angle better.

Yes he did. There's a video of him saying it. I'm not saying your wrong but that's the equation that is usually presented to the general public. Einstein even did it himself

Yes, he did. Multiple times. In his original paper, he wrote m = L/c^2, not m = E/c^2, but afterwards, in multiple letters, he wrote E=mc^2 explicitly. It is not hard to find.

​@@epixman_ Exactly my point. If he figured out M=E/c^2 then he would have figured out E=Mc^2 the very next second lmao

Netflix only cares about being diversity and money, they never cared about science and the advancement of human civilization.

Yes

And yes i found this is more intresting than that web...

@@HotShame0 yes that's because they make entertainment, not science books and schools

Switch off your phone then study... Might help

Series name ?

@@deepakpanda7285 Squid game

Pal,there is whole lot difference between motivation and obsession

I owe my success to having listened respectfuly to the very best advice, and then going away and doing the exact opposite.

How do we get paid?

Is it through online investment platform?

Another self promotion shit

Yes through online investment platform

His theory could not be proved effectively in his life time, that is why he did not get nobel for this.

@@vaibhavsingh-qx8qd no bro it has been proved by him But nobody understood him.

Mr Missile Einstein failed in proving it. A first proof was produced by Max Laue in 1911. Einstein never constructed a general proof.

Members on the Nobel Prize committee-notably Phillip Lenard, an AntiSemite who derided the work of Einstein and countless Jewish scientists during the rise of the Nazi party in Germany-felt that the theory of relativity was not proved beyond a shadow of a doubt. Einstein would later be recognized by the committee and receive the Nobel Prize for his solution to the photoelectric effect. Ironically, Lenard was known for his experimental work on the photoelectric effect.

@@trags2 thnks 4 d info

Damn the legendary meme!!!

I read somewhere that Einsteins equation and idea where something that all scientist understood immediately. It was like the tree with the signpost hidden in the forrest: Nobody thought about it but when you see it all the directions become clear.

@Philipp So True 🤣

didnt he said, THAT EINSTEIN ANSWERED A QUESTION NO ONE WAS ASKING

Because eisteins equation is also has a part of maxwell's so little reading can be understood if you know maxwell's equation.

@@jambalaya201 Really? Because his assumption that light was moving at a constant speed was very controversial at first until another statement that followed from his assumptions were experimentally shown to be consistent

Actually, SR is an improvement on Galilean relativity, which was created a hundred years before Newton. Einstein uses derivatives in his original paper ofc, but you can describe SR without them.

same omg

Given that he predicted gravitational waves 100 years in advance...

Okay one for photoelectric effect one for theory of relativity but what about the third ? Only curiosity Nothing more as I also thinks he should get 2 noble prizes but never thought of third one

@@archiltopwal5205 one for special theory of relativity

@@archiltopwal5205 E=mc2 is literally the most famous equation of all time, detailing that mass and energy are two sides of the same coin. How could this not be a noble prize? Then there's Special relativity, Avogadro's Number, Quantum Theory of Light, Wave-Particle Duality, Brownian movement, Bose-Einstein Condensate, and more....

First of all that enstein was not a lone genius and he even invented e=mc² himself😂😂😂😂😂😂

ikr he's the true genius

That’s not hard within scientific community. That’s Max Laue.

TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM energy. Excellent !!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand !!!

Einstein was a total weasel. IMPORTANT.

UNDERSTANDING TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE): The following explains why and how what is THE EARTH/ground is necessarily (AND CLEARLY) the FULL DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE (ON BALANCE). INSTANTaneity is fundamental to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). Carefully consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) that actually IS IN what is outer “space“. Carefully consider what is the man (AND what is THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. (SO, carefully consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE.) Consider what is the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE. Indeed, touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); as TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. I have explained why THE PLANETS (including the Moon) move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun, AND I have explained the cosmological redshift. I have explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !! (Einstein never nearly understood gravity, TIME, or time dilation ON BALANCE.) THINK. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND balanced IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting; as Einstein's equations are NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE). Therefore, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or balanced with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". Great. Therefore, the ULTIMATE BASIS of SPACE AND TIME is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETISM AND GRAVITY in balance; as PERPETUAL motion is the ultimate answer to what is then TIME DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to TIME AND SPACE. Accordingly, the relative end(s) of SPACE AND TIME are thus understood to involve gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy in balance. Balance and completeness go hand in hand. TIME dilation ultimately proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity on balance, as the EYE is the size of a black hole in BALANCED RELATION to what is the EARTH; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. (Consider what is the Sun on balance.) Time is (NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY) proven to be possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Consider what is the man (the eye) that actually IS in outer “space” ON BALANCE. AGAIN, TIME dilation ultimately proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity on balance. NOW, consider what is the man (AND THE EYE) who actually IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

Scientist or physicist?

Huh , it's true ...he worked as a clerk 😬, everything in the documentary is very close to reality-

Not really. Between university graduation in 1900 and his PhD he had a hard time finding a job, but he hadn't done anything or written anything yet. He also didn't show up to many of his classes so his professors didn't give him good recommendations. He got his PhD in 1905 - at 26 years old. That same year he wrote 4 major papers - photoelectric effect, Brownian motion, special relativity, and mass energy equivalence. The papers were so groundbreaking that it took the best physicist of the day, Max Planck, to recognize it. Regardless, his ideas were accepted rather quickly for physics. By 30 years old he was a professor and a few years later a member of the Prussian Academy of Sciences. In 1915 he published the general theory of relativity which took about 4 years to prove. By the time it was in 1919, he was world famous. So basically, as soon as he published his 1905 papers he was on the map. There were people who disagreed with him, of course, but they either figured it out or got left behind. Just as Einstein was when quantum mechanics became mainstream.

He became a physics professor at 33 at ETH Zurich, he had couple of years of struggle to become respected, not decades

Also might have to do with Einstein being overrated, especially since he didnt even come up with the theory of relativity, and simply took the credit from his first wife without giving her any. Side note, he was also a socialist and proponent for world government. Ill concede he was knowledgeable when it came to physics, but he was also an idiot. Judge Einstein by his body of work after he left his first wife for his first cousin, and then tell me whats remarkable about him.

Einstein was a known weasel who was seriously lacking in common sense. He was a delusional religious nut.

@@frankdimeglio8216 there are rarely any academically smart people who have common senese nowadays lmao

@@SCP--mw7tx BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. c squared CLEARLY and necessarily represents balanced acceleration---a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE in relation to what are E AND "m" (ON BALANCE !!). Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Hence, what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE is (CLEARLY) invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE AND what is the translucent BLUE SKY (ON BALANCE). Great. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio Boris Stoyanov is a super bright and an HONEST physicist. He has agreed that the following writing (and I quote) is "crystal clear": "ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. Accordingly, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance consistent with/as what is balanced ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as electromagnetism/energy is gravity. Gravity IS electromagnetism/energy. That objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course) PROVES that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Think about it. By Frank DiMeglio” THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS DIMENSIONALLY CONSISTENT WITH ONE AND WHAT IS A TWO DIMENSIONAL SURFACE OR SPACE ON BALANCE, THEREBY PROVING THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE): This also clearly proves ON balance that E=mc2 is directly taken from F=ma. Magnificent. Gravity is a property of SPACE ON BALANCE. It involves adherence or cohesion. So, BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider what is the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground (ON BALANCE). What is the blue sky ON BALANCE? This IS the blue EARTH AS this is expressed on balance WITH (or equivalently by) what is the eye. The translucent AND blue sky is consistent with what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL (AND electromagnetic/gravitational) EXPERIENCE ON BALANCE, as touch AND feeling BLEND; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electroMAGNETIC/gravitational ON BALANCE. I have also CLEARLY explained (ON BALANCE) why THE PLANETS move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE SUN !! I have explained why WHAT IS THE EYE beholds what is then (ON BALANCE) WHAT IS THE BLUE EARTH. Notice the associated black “space” AND DOME regarding what is the eye. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Very carefully consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE !! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Again, I have proven AND explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Gravity cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. What is quantum gravity is CLEARLY fundamental ON BALANCE. Gravity is CLEARLY fundamental ON BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Define “mass". You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. GREAT. You have to CLEARLY AND fully understand what E=mc2 means and represents ON BALANCE. We want to understand the dimensions in a seamless (or balanced) fashion in relation to gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (including what is E=mc2). Consider one AND three dimensional SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE. NOW, consider all of the following. Consider what is E=mc2. CLEARLY, you have to understand what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents BALANCED acceleration in conjunction WITH what is NECESSARILY a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Consider what is gravity AND E=mc2 ON BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. By Frank DiMeglio The cosmological redshift, the "black hole(s)", AND time dilation are CLEARLY ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational (ON/IN BALANCE). This is CLEARLY consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. Here's the proof: My answer to Why is it that only Dongfang can perfectly realize the unity of macro and micro quantum theory and prove that LIGO's gravitational waves are lies (orcid.org/0000-0002-3644-5170)? historicalphysics.quora.com/Why-is-it-that-only-Dongfang-can-perfectly-realize-the-unity-of-macro-and-micro-quantum-theory-and-prove-that-LIGOs-gra-2?ch=15&oid=348200670&share=59169188&srid=uIk6ye&target_type=answer BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Consider what is the FOURTH dimension (AND the term c4) from Einstein's field equations. c4 CLEARLY represents a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. (Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) Given E=mc2, c squared CLEARLY represents a one dimensional SPACE ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio

i agree

the origianal formula is a bit bigger than the one showed in the video

brb thx for informing me

@@terrible1237 formulas are always bigger if you consider all the other factors even equation e=mc^2 is proved by modification of bigger formulas and arculated in smaller one which is what humanity have to follow science and shorten all the things which are complexed today

Welp, The actual hero of relativity was 1/√(1 - v^2/c^2) If it's small then the read the general relativity equation. Its probably the smartest equation yet written. Its not small to me

Same here

Well it was only e=mc^2, quite a short equation tbh. (I know there's a larger form of it)

Succulent Orange Also in order to determine e=mc^2 to be right you have to read the derivation...so yes takes time

@@qawi272 yeah I was just joking that it's actually a tiny equation, and the video implies that if you see it written down you suddenly understand how the universe is created and become omnipotent.

@@goodgood8641 that's great news but a bit unrelated?

Be my physics teacher.

THANK you 🙌

No need to flex on us lmao but still interesting nonetheless

@@AKASHAKASH-zf3hz The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE: Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio

It is not a coincidence that the Sun and the Moon manifest (or form up) as the same size in the sky. They are the same size as what is THE EYE. INDEED, the tides are CLEARLY ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational on/in balance. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (on balance), as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=MC2. This explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Great. Notice that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE), as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. TRUTH, reality, AND nature/natural experience go hand in hand. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT !!!! THE TOP DOWN UNDERSTANDING OF TIME (AND time dilation) AND PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE: TIME AND the fourth dimension (WITH c4) may be explained (ON BALANCE) in accordance with the following, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON BALANCE !!!! Consider the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Now, consider what is the Sun AND the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. NOW, think about what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !!! Think about what is THE MAN (THE EYE) who actually IS IN what is outer “space”. Basically and importantly, there is NO TIME. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as gravity is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as TIME dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !!! Magnificent. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!!!!! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE), as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=MC2. Therefore, I have explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, consider the role or relation of what is the EYElid !!!! (LOOK around.) Great. Very carefully consider what is THE MAN (AND THE EYE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. (Consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE on balance !!!!) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !! Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! This ALSO explains F=ma AND E=MC2 ON BALANCE !!!!!!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky (ON BALANCE). GREAT. The tides are CLEARLY reflective of the fact that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. So, it is now time to turn to the BALANCED examination of what is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE in relation to (ON BALANCE) what is the Sun AND the speed of light (c). Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Great. NOW, carefully consider what follows. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE) !!!!!! The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! So, it is now TIME to turn to the DIRECT comparison of what is the orange (AND setting) Sun WITH what is the fully illuminated (AND setting) Moon. They are both the same size as what is THE EYE, AND these forms manifest (or form up) at what is EYE LEVEL/body height. Also, notice that the brightness of these manifestations appears to be the same. Moreover, the curvature or shape of said Moon matches that of THE EARTH/ground (that is, given a clear horizon). Lava appears orange, AND it even manifests as blood red. Excellent. I have proven that the sizes of said Moon, said Sun, and what is THE EYE cannot be a strange "coincidence". In fact, consider the CONNECTION with the blue sky ON BALANCE; as the tides are CLEARLY proven to be electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE !!! I have mathematically unified physics. I have proven that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! Finally, notice the consistent AND BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of space that CLEARLY connects it ALL up (ON BALANCE); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND necessarily proven to be gravity ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as TIME dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE); as TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE !!! GREAT !!!! Importantly, ON BALANCE, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Great !!!!! By Frank DiMeglio

As a student in physics... personally I cannot watch degrasse tyson or physics girl the same as I did when I was younger, once you grasp the mathematics and actual rigorous foundations of these theories you realise just how surface level all these explanations are. Also, I don't think 99.9% can never understand this type of stuff, it's just that you have to be curious and motivated enough to study these difficult topics

I mean they way they represented the Train scene was kind of how he imagined it in the first place, but with the Munich bell tower in a moving train

​@@charliekirkland6040pop-science edutainment is terrible. People think they are learning something but in reality, it teaches them close to nothing 😅

I also feel that magic. Even though im not physics student. Always curious to know how the universe works.

Einstein was a *relative* genius not absolute. 😏😏

@Abhishek Joshi but how did he understand that this equation was right?

@Abhishek Joshi I will give you a like and I will give my self a like to avoid disappear in the infinity lol

It's hell alot easier to understand a concept created by someone else, than the required understanding to create it. It's alot easier to understand calculus now, than it is to understand the levels of math required to invent it like Newton did.

Well special relativity is pretty easy to understand mathematically. It's math you learn in 8th grade. The physical concepts might be more difficult.

@@Shadow05eth Yeah, sure, you learn tensor calculus in 8th grade!

GRAIL OF PHYSICS!!!!!!!!

It’s HOLY GRAIL

If that had happened...

Bruh...I know wat u mean 😂

so he wrote it e=mc2 for simplisity's sake?

@@martizong Einstein wrote m = L/v^2, it was later written differently for simplicity.

And these 🐢🐢 to my brain: Hey look it's slower than us

Imagine how many careers it has funded.

Science is absolute truth he just found out and supported what actually exists in nature, instead of supporting false through which people made money

None L

would be everyone of who lived at heroshima and nagasaki ;p

@@luckys1evin Brian Greene 💰 is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics.

It already won oscars...

Best part ! Yes you're right;,

Not very accurate though

Ramanujan

But it's cringy. TMWNI was better compared to this.

theirs more to it than that....

exactly, they just speak the things they memorized to get money

Then ,i am lucky to have my 10 th physics teacher who teaches newton's law related to ineria , in the same way as einstein, but now ...doing graduation with the teachers as u said

E=mc^2 was a paradox according to poincare. This is because poincare couldn’t figure out the mechanical use of it.

Poincaré was totally correct in his mathematical derivations, but had no grasp at all of the physical significance of what was going on.

Now they sit staring at facebook and twitter on their phones, desperately trying to come up with snarky replies and followers.

ywnbaw

Well this is a show trying to portray a "thought experiment" to an audience that may not understand clearly the maths behind it so ig we don't need to worry about that. And yes it was known that light moves at one speed. Never accelerating or decelerating. (In those days). So Einstein concluded that if two people measure the same speed at variable distance, then the factor that changed was how TIME was RELATIVE to the observer's own SPEED. And that was the Eureka moment for him :)

@@ebk_72, yes Sir, all true. I'd just like to suggest one correction to what you wrote, because it might be misunderstood by some reader: It is not about two people measuring the same speed of light at different distances from the light source, but also while moving at different speeds relative to the light source. And his Eureka moment of course had a lot to do with the outcome of the Michelson-Morley experiment, which already suggested that some decades earlier. I still think, the way this "train experiment" is shown is a bit misleading. How fast would that train have to move, so a passenger would experience the delay shown in this scene? And also the conclusion is wrong. Because the observation of those two lightning events happening at the same time for one observer and at different times for another observer in itself does not already suggest relativity, does it? It only shows that light does not travel infinitely fast, which was already known.

I have no clue what you guys are debating. It appears very intelligent though

@@maverickcruise , back in the old days (before i got into the adult industry in order to make more money) i was a physicist. And while watching this scene some old knowledge acted up in my brain. Because it is always the same problem with relativity: It is so counter-intuitive that it's almost impossible to make it clear in some easy way. Nothing shown in this scene is incompatible with "classical" (Newtonian) physics, in my opinion. It's just light, traveling at a finite speed. So what? That identical clocks actually show a time difference once they were exposed to differing frames of reference is quite mind blowing and sort of unreal. What the heck is going on here? It's a strange universe for sure ^^

I'd argue this has been a bit damaging and is unfair to Einstein. In reality, Einstein was tenacious, imaginative and hard-working as well as incredibly smart. Stereotypes like these teach kids that they can coast on their perceived intelligence and everything else will fall in place.

What Dimitris says is true. I would read the blog post ''How important is genius?'' by Terence Tao, it should be on his website.

His voice smarter than him!

yeah hes pretty aight

hes gonna become a physcist one day for real if he keeps his curiosity man...

Yeah but it also has no reason not to. Light moves at the same speed irregardless of direction if you are an objective observer. This is like saying that you can't prove there aren't a secret infinite amount of elves videotaping you. Simply ludicrous

It has been proven a million times over. Putting aside the innumerable experiments where it correctly predicts the outcome, it's been proven DIRECTLY using atomic clocks (which are quantum resonators). They simply put the resonators on fast-moving equipment such as jets (or sent one up to the international space station, as they often do) and then re-unite them later, with them having now travelled at vastly different relativistic speeds. Invariably the result that proves Einstein right emerges - resonators kept together in the same inertial frame on earth retain the same frequency, but resonators with which they were originally synched but which have since travelled in another inertial frame have their frequencies altered precisely in-line with the time dilation effects that emerge out of general relativity's equation, which establishes that the speed of light (and its proxy measure, time) are indeed relative. These are quantum effects intrinsic to the medium - they're completely immune to confounding variables. You can read about this class of experiments here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_testing_of_time_dilation

@@benisprobablyangry239 but how do we synchronise the clocks in the first place and then move them apart. How can we assume no time dilation? There is actually a video by Veritasium. Perhaps you would like to watch it.

@@priyanshsingh1753 atomic clocks are based on the intrinsic properties of the material they're made out of - you simply cut the material in two and now you have two perfectly synchronized atomic clocks. Cut it again and you have four perfectly synchronized atomic clocks.

After watching a Veritasium video? Lol

Herr Einstein initially wrote : m = L/v^2. It was later changed in 1912 to m = E/c^2

@@Prabhatsinghh initially v was a constant speed of light?

@@Prabhatsinghh Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio