He forgets a lot of important things. This guy is a shill

@@brobrosefington6787 A shill for what ? I enjoy his videos and like that he is branching out into history.

@@infinitemonkey917 A shill for the globalists

@@brobrosefington6787 Umm, OK, and the deep state child eaters too I suppose.

@@brobrosefington6787 You don't know what that word means.

My family named a shrub in our yard "George Bush"

Arse-whopping? More like molecular annihilation lol

10/10

Yeah, that was a big brain maneuver.

It was a good decision

When I listened to that part I thought my whole life I had heard wrong and I had to go back to one of his previous videos to be sure.

No, Perot's reentry to the race & as a 3rd party gaining 19.2% was Bush's fall from 'glory' & "Us:good- Them:Baad". I don't like being talked down to by a liar & a thief.

That would be amazing

Those guys are mostly just formerly religious youtube atheists. Dave is more matter of fact science and history.

What about PBS Eons?

But it be even more amazing to see Kent Hovind and Ken Ham around the same table.

@@oddviews Not sure Dave has the patience for that.

One example was the vietnamese communists that modeled their constitution after the american constitution. after being snubbed by america they went to china and america went on to lose the vietnam war

What do you mean. Today we support the communist ones. What do you think China is, which most of our pols now work for.

And the genocide in Yemen.

WHAT is COMMUNISM..A STYLE OF GOVERNMENT TO SERVE THE COMMON MAN..BUT THEY RATHER LIKED ,THE NATZI/FASCISTS..WHO DEFENDED,THE ELITE,EUROPEAN +EMPIRES*..WHICH WILL RATHER DEFEND HITLER,THAN THE COMMUNIST,THAT WAS FIGHTING THE ARISTOCRATS,LAND AND GULAG ,SLAVE LIKE PEASANTS,THAT WERE POSSESSED BY THEIR ARISTOCRATIC MASTER FOR LIFE..JUST LIKE THE SLAVES SHIPPED BACK FROM AFRICA,TO THE EUROPEAN EMPIRES,AND AMERICA, BAUGHT AND USED,AS THE POSSESSION OF THEIR MASTERS,AND SO WERE THEIR CHILDREN,TILL THE 1960S IN THE U.S. LIBERATED THE SLAVES..RUSSIA STARTED IT EARLIER,THE IDEA WAS TO WEEKEN RUSSIA,BY KILLING THE TSAR,BUT THE PEOPLE TOOK CHARGE OF THE NATION,AND EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN EMPIRES,ARE SCARED OF MARKS WRITINGS ,FOT THAT REASON ALONE.. IMAGINE...AMERICA OR EUROPW WITH NO ROYALTY OR ELITE BILLIONAIRES IN AMERICA!!! THE RESON THEY PLOTED TO KILLF.D.R.,JUST LIKE THEY DID KILL WASHINGTON...THE SAGA GOES ON......

@@EmpressAA I can see you have a lot of passion for what you're talking about... But maybe save the stream of consciousness style of writing for poetry or prose, instead of using it to get your point across. I'm not here to argue for or against your points. I just find your comment to be indecipherable. Again, no hard feelings.

Saddam was ready to take the rest of the peninsula. Kuwait had served as a fine warm-up. The Arab states of the region were highly panicked. I suppose one bright point out of the whole debacle was the development of new ways to fight oil fires after Saddam ordered his military to set fire to Kuwait's wells.

I won't speculate about what Hussain intended. The conspiracy talk is that we lured him into the invasion of Kuwait to rationalize our incursion into the region. This is a fallacy. The long history of the dispute had been over a narrow band of land at their border, and the US wanted no part of that dispute. Our State Department told Hussain that. We were caught unawares by his large scale invasion. Perhaps Hussain misunderstood our position, but not a sinister plot. An error in our intelligence, but not a cunning trap.

A very effective method is by writing it down in your own words, to summarize it. The better you get at summarizing a topic, the more you'll be able to fill in the gaps because you've already built the associations necessary to compile it. Memory works a lot through association, it's why a certain smell can instantly transport you back to a particular time and place. Repetition is also key. Teaching is probably the most effective way of retaining knowledge because it is the application of this method, and it vastly increases your understanding. There are people that can memorize whole pages complex subjects but they can't ''understand'' any of it.

Still? I thought I blocked it.

Was it by a 'James Tour'?

I never saw it. What did it look like?

​@@NapaCat It was ridiculous. The entire advertisement consisted of clips of Dave pasted together to make it seem like he isn't a "real professor", complete with a trumpet in the background and loud sound effects. If you want to see for yourself, check out the channel "Logical Plausible Probable" where the full video is publicly uploaded

@@cookieman2028 Wow--Tour's pathetic.

When it comes to politics everything is opinion, even the retelling of said history. Highlighting success A and omitting scandal B or choosing the converse is a choice left to historians and textbook companies. To believe there is even a way to relay history in an unbiased way is disingenuous or naive, you choose. In my estimation, the only way to get the best grasp of the times you’re interested in is to get many different recollections of the same time, then at least you can start to form your own idea of what you think happened. Just an opinion of someone that has a worthless degree in the subject.

@@Mr.Ogynist Degree on what, politics, or history? You made comment on 2 subjects. One of which you aren't specialized in. Which is it that you are pretending to understand?

​@@D-Vinkoyeah I'm too dumb to understand anything I really need somebody else to explain it for me. Maybe I can find a historian who can explain why HW gave multiple conflicting accounts of his whereabouts on Nov 22 1963 then later said he "didn't remember". Maybe they can explain why he's the only person in history who can't remember where he was that day. I am but a mere simpleton after all.

What a stupid comment

Check earlier episodes, Eisenhower, Carter, etc.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains sir any hope for playlist on Philosophy, philosophy of science, psychology,Rocket science

All of the above! Though psychology is the only one currently being written.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Thank you for your great works it's really helpful

Presidential topics usually have politics tightly attached. When omitted, so much of the presidential story is also omitted.

Have I found? I'm not looking. I'm not a teacher anymore. I'm a science communicator.

By teaching on KZfaq he can help many more people than he could in a physical classroom. This channel has more than a thousand videos on academic subjects and is a free educational resource which people all over the world use. I have found it tremendously helpful for reviewing physics, o chem, anatomy, etc. I've spent a substantial amount of time watching several different science education channels and this one is the best in terms of 1) best organization 2) being clear, concise, accurate 3) breadth and variety of topics.

Without Ross Perot, Bill Clinton wouldn't have won. Looking at the state by state numbers, Perot made it possible for Clinton to carry most of the states he won that would've otherwise went to Bush. Bill Clinton wasn't nearly as popular a figure as he has been made out to be. The left couldn't stand him because they viewed him as too conservative and the fading conservative wing of the Democratic party couldn't stand him because they basically went extinct in 1994. The Democratic party has been losing a greater share of the rural voter ever since. Also. His trade policies rapidly sped up the death of America's industrial and manufacturing sector. Barack Obama is actually the most popular Democratic figure since FDR and his popular vote majorities make that clear. Bill Clinton never got above 49% of the popular vote in either of his elections. Reagan is probably still the most popular political figure overall since Franklin Roosevelt.

I don't see a lot basis for that, perot seem to hate trickle down economics and was a protectionist

@Robert HunterYou're right. I wasn't sure and I was thinking it was the Japanese prime minister, but I was too lazy to look it up and come back and finish my comment lol. But thanks for the correction. I usually make sure I'm not looking like a conspiracy theorist and check the facts. But I guess just like the conspiracy theorist of the world I was simply too lazy to do that lol.

Wait for the Clinton episode.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Are you going to do a Trump episode?

Yep.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains I cannot fucking wait for that one lol.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains The comments will be poison haha

This guy makes good videos but he is a bit biased against conservatives you can really see the difference between videos mentioning republicans and the ones mentioning democrats but at the end everyone is biased..... You can't blame him..

You should probably wait for the Clinton episode.

I'm not going to to say "no doubt" because the world is wild, but those that love to act as though Perot had no impact do make me laugh. I also enjoy how many people--in this case establishment/corporate Democrats--enjoy ignoring Perot's impact but cling to Nader's influence in 2020. Simply look at the digits and tell me your eyes don't roll. Even if Perot's voters went 60/40 to Bush/Clinton that would've made a major shift in the EC. The so-called "Red State vs. Blue State" mentality didn't exist during the 92 or 96 elections.

He made money in oil. I don't know what you're talking about.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains I recommend Georg Rockall-Schmidt’s latest video. “There’s nothing wrong with nepotism as long as you keep it within the family.” etc and so on.

A brief history of Bush Sr. and the events of his presidency. The same as all other installments in this American History playlist.

Having class doesn't really help anybody. The decisions a president makes and laws they sign, are what matters. We shouldn't elect politicians on their class or looks or speaking ability or whether they are cool.

And committed treason to get elected.

@@rickb2432 What did biden commit to get elected?

@@delila351 literally proven nothing :) supreme court appointed by trump even thinks its bs.

@@delila351 a campaign.

And Bush, Jr. and Trump. Notice a trend?

It isn't, though. You just don't like the facts that rub up against your empty ideology. Sorry.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains But it is superficial and one-sided.

@@ProfessorDaveExplainsyou offered a well put together and factual video. I appreciate your upload and up to date comments despite the video being posted 2 year ago. No need to apologize. Everyone has an opinion. However, I’m guessing you know mark twain’s advice when it comes to arguing with idiots. Thanks again.

I like how you explained what the inaccuracies are.

I suppose you can technically say that Truman doesn't qualify since you used the term "incumbent VP", but that just makes it clear that it is a pretty lame thing to brag about. Oh, who was the last left-handed VP with red hair elected for president who was formerly a senator from Rhode Island?!?!!?! Yawn.

OUCH!

I didn’t write this, and it’s just the facts. Sorry, kiddo.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Everyone knows what William Horton did after his furlough, but I also know what he did to get the murder 1 conviction as it was a brutal pointless murder Not that far from where I live. I also know about the criminal justice system , why he was in a minimum security, never mind let out, is beyond comprehension. What does that have to do with race? The left reveals its own racism by constantly making things about race, instead of just taking it on its own merits. THEY are making him part of " a group" instead of just letting him stand on individual merits, as simply a man.....also the " October surprise" was investigated for 12 years and nothing ever became of it. For some reason it just can't be accepted that maybe Iran knew the Reagan Bush administration wasn't gonna pull any punches and maybe Iran actually feared them alot more than Carter. Maybe Iran also had there own problems with Carter and wanted to humiliate him for whatever reason. This is another common thread, basically being poor loosers. In 1972 after 4 years in office, Nixon won by a landslide months AFTER Watergate but the dems and especially the media hated him for it and couldn't accept this. They just had to beat that scandal to death. Then in 1980 they had to invent the Oct. Surprise to explain why Americans hated Carter's weak foreign policy. They had to invent Russian collusion in 2016 to explain why Hillary who spent more money,had mainstream media and Hollywood on her side, and experience, lost to Trump. Now they are indicted Trump for everything under the sun. So why not that? They said it was a definite back in 2017 so what happened to all that proof? Why did Hillary Clinton's campaign manager admit she faked some of that Russian collusion story? Why isn't she under indictment? And to show you it's not about party I don't think Trump won in 2020 but you know how he just can't except it? That's how the left can't except their defeats and have to make up some excuse. It's ironic that one of there favorite presidents is LBJ a man who escalated the Vietnam War from a couple hundred to 30000 dead on his watch, who destroyed society with the war on poverty, who was riddled with scandal with Bobby Baker and Billie Sol Estees who was linked to many murders, including the one Mac Wallace( his confidant) was CONVICTED of but given 5 years probation by a LBJ crony judge. He is forgiven all this for signing a piece of paper in 1964. Even tho he had opposed civil rights for 30 years up to that point and was a notorious racist ( and drunk) according to multiple sources.. I say this for 2 reasons 1) bc the left will endorse anybody who claims to identify w there cause. 2) no matter how bad you say Nixon is he had nothing on LBJ but bc he signed a piece of paper that warms the cockles of the leftist heart, he's ok. ..Joe Biden in 2020 saying " white supremacy " is the biggest threat in America today. I've lived in many cities. I don't see much white supremacy. I saw blm burning down parts of the country. But no white supremacy. He's using race to get votes it's so transparent. What about the " insurrection " of pro Palestinian extremist a couple of weeks ago? How come that's ok? Can you imagine if they were Trump supporters? The media would've had a field day. But bc they are against Israel, who is our greatest ally, some how its ok. Not cool. Oh what happened to those 51 intel officers who said it wasn't hunters laptop🤣

No. He wasn’t.

@@burningphoenix6679 Helped kill JFK and plan 911 and the Great Reset's New World Order Plandemic? Ya, he a bad man....

The entire Bush family is corrupt. That's why they align themselves with the Clinton's and Obama's as opposed to Trump.

BTW bush did MUCH more evil than this................investigate.

It's just a star, bud.

Lol

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Lol Ok. Kind of weird you just decided to put a red star on your chest with no additional thought behind it...

What can I say. I'm a weird guy. I saw a blank shirt, decided to fill it with a star.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Fair enough. Cheers.