R.i.p

I shed a tiny tear for each one

Yea and i was the pilot

​@@alexgomez-rc5nt"Where were you when the plane crashed..."

In the tiny cockpit, obviously@@MeOwOgai

Yes 😂. I can hear the ambiguous robotic female voice loud and clear.

STALL, STALL

TERRAIN AHEAD! TERRAIN AHEAD! WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP! WHOOP WHOOP! PULL UP! STALL! STALL!

DONT SINK, DONT SINK

CLIMB CLIMB DESCENT DESCENT WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP PULL UP STALL STALL BANK ANGLE BANK ANGLE SINKRATE DONT SINK

Not funny

@@LeftIsBest001 Yes funny 😄

@@LeftIsBest001learn to take a joke

@@LeftIsBest001This guys username fits how sensitive his comment is lmao

not that funny since it doesnt make sense unless you are ignorant@@allistairlicorice310

The Tiny NTSB demands it to keep the air safe for other tiny people.

"We have a tiny number for you to call" * whips out a comically small phone *

🥇

Also big RC beer trucks and utility trucks to recreate that one scene near the end of Airplane

@@Cyke101 lol and a dump truck full of lamps to get some lights out on that feild

Lol

Lmfao

Hi

yo

It has nothing to do with scale but correct build methods; in this case the tail sheared off. There isn't a limit to model making before you get to a real plane, they just get bigger till you get . . . . a mosquito, for example.

Proper planes will disintegrate if you fly them like this. The thrust-to-weight ratio is massively higher on models than real planes, basically the square-cube law.

​@@elmodiddly that is most definitely not true, just like a crow can't exist let alone fly if you reduce it to the size of a mosquito, and a mosquito can't exist if you enlarge it to the size of a crow. These models are built to _look_ like real airplanes, but the physics of flight and of material strength are very different

​@@straightpipediesel All of those are parts of the same thing. These models _need_ that kind of thrust to compensate for bad aerodynamics, moving an actually well designed plane towards something closer to a remote controlled rocket or drone with some plane-looking scaffolding on top that barely helps it to fly. Look up small aircraft with wings and propellers that were actually designed to fly like Lancet drones - they don't look like boeing 747s at all

@@NJ-wb1czYou also have to consider bad piloting. You don't fly an airplane without basic instruments by external eyeball 300 feet away. A model's got to be able to climb when a pilot pulls up enough when it looks fast enough. UAVs, missiles and such have inertial reference units, air data probes and autopilots which consider these factors.

I'd never seen a spontaneous mid-air re-kit before.

I am wondering about that... Both lost control when they were in a line from our line of sight. Maybe the RC signals kind of overlapped each other and the planes got bad commands?

You can see the despair in his body language. So much money, time and effort gone in an instant.

American 587 moment

As a Brazilian i almost cried..

I couldn’t agree more and condolences to the owner/pilot, however in cockpit videos of the blue angels I’ve seen the highly engineered vertical stabs vibrating like crazy during certain manoeuvres and that design is very strong indeed! Just goes to show the forces involved during certain speeds and manoeuvres.

For real it sucks, but I wouldn’t say the whole aircraft looks flimsy. From what I saw, it seems like the vertical stabiliser breaks first. That clearly means the vertical stabiliser was too flimsy. Once the vertical stabiliser breaks, the whole plane is destabilised, causing the plane to go through the air at a strange angle, putting far more pressure on the rest of the plane than you would ever expect it to withstand. Of course it’s going to break up. The tail was clearly too weak. The rest of the aircraft? Hard to say. But I would certainly hesitate before claiming that it’s all too weak. It clearly got off the ground and flew for a while before breaking.

Yeah, unlike certain "planes" in the past.

@@nckhedu mean 🛩️✈️🏙️🏙️

@@Chuchisqtoo soon

well yeah it was in real life.

actually it happened again, boy with a giraffe plush on news, he said a second plane hit south tower again

you probably mean hobbies/toys. otherwise (often military) drones can be as large as manned aircraft

@@user-wq9mw2xz3jHe never said drones

​​@@user-wq9mw2xz3jYou know what they mean.

Just equip one with a bomb and you have something scarier

@@user-wq9mw2xz3jwas about to say this, I think the James-Webb space telescope is also rc technically

Well sadly I have seen a few real crashes of plains and every time when they crash they made a huge fire ball and massive ploom of black smoke, so there really is not comparison to RC.

@@HOLLASOUNDSthe odds of seeing more than one plane crash in real time in your life are roughly 400,000 times less likely than winning the lottery

​@@asparkdeity8717however he never mentioned or clarified he was at the scene or just watched a youtube compilation

​@@asparkdeity8717 I'm not convinced that's true. What numbers are you using?

@@HOLLASOUNDS You mean like the great plains?

You can do way more than 35° it would just be considered outside the normal flight envelope but yes they are flying these liner way to aggressively, if they are faithful then the aerodynamics are similar and then you're not supposed to fly it like a fighter.

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l Or, if you are going to fly it that aggressively, you need to fly it higher so you have more altitude to try and recover it in. You can see at 0:26 he's almost recovered to level flight, but he needed at least fifty feet more altitude for it to successfully arrest its descent.

@@phytonso9877 Yeah but that's not as spectacular... I have a lot of respect for RC pilots I can't do line of sight well, so I get the desire to keep then close but then again I don't build these things that cost more than a used Toyota. I think some of them are better engineers than they are pilots because if you fly that low you can't mess up. Although I guess the Gripen was the opposite, he seemed like a good pilot but his aircraft completely disintegrated, him I felt bad for. The Concorde was more than high enough to recover from the stall, not sure what he was trying with a delta wing flying as slow as my foam RC plane. You can almost run faster than the stall speed of that thing but I still crashed it... used to having a (virtual) instrument panel and artificial horizon otherwise I would perform about the same. Especially with these using multiple actual jet engines that cost about 3 grand minimum you'd think they focus a bit more on the basics of flying like not stalling or not flying close to the ground at that speed and banking at 60°+. In German we say Mehr Geld als Verstand which roughly translates to more money than common sense/intelligence.

Bank angle doesn't have anything to do with lift. It's energy and angle of attack. The first pilot stalled the right wing. Edit: 3rd and 4th were also stalls.

@@icecl0ud Of course it does, you say yourself he stalled a wing. That's why wings level is one of the steps in a terrain escape maneuver because it gives you the best possible climb rate. Now I supposr you could call it effective lift, as yes technically both wings generate equal lift but that no longer point up against gravity, like a component force, the large the angle at which the force acts the lower the force, remember the vector crap from school? If you are relatively slow or banking extremely hard, the component of the lift facing upward can become less than gravity pulling the aircraft down and it stalls. This causes the nose to drop when you bank, so that's why you give some backpressure and the more you bank the more you pull the nose up to maintain your angle of attack and climb rate. If you don't do that the nose will drop fast at a high bank angle. Try rolling a 737. At some point the nose just drops around 60-70 degrees even if you fully pull up and you drop and by the time you've inverted you're 30° nose down and overspeeding.

The plants were damaged

At least those kind giants rendered assistance.

yeah ants

Meat eaters cry for the plants. 😭

Rip to the ants

4th one was pilot error as well. Should've known that the plane couldn't climb that steeply, and didn't leave enough altitude for stall recovery

@@ZeroG_Bandit yeah. Basically AF4590 in a nutshell

@@FlamingHotGamingYT, well, AF4590 was on fire, this one wasn't

Was wondering why that gripen just kind of exploded

That griffin went down like it went into a Star Wars nebula fr

nah, there was no hotel… just a fence

@@ILoudEstI nah 💀

​@@ILoudEstIthats crazy

The Concorde was paying tribute to TU-144...

@@ILoudEstI 💀

no the number 1 was Bank Angle. It overbanks, and the plane rolls over resulting in steep dive.

The first one was due to a loss of lift from high bank angle, not technically a stall. The lift forces went from mostly pointing up, to pointing sideways. From there the only force keeping the nose up was from the rudder. As the nose fell the pilot didn’t react quickly enough to stop the roll input and pull out of the dive, which due to the low altitude resulted in the crash. Had the pilot quickly reacted to the loss of attitude control and banked left before the loss of lift, it would have been fine. Otherwise they immediately needed to stop with the roll and pull up to maintain altitude

Number 1: No one cares Number 2: no one cares Number 3: No one cares Number 4: no one cares

Number 5 did not crash hardly probably just the gear broke

@@jasonmurawski5877this is indeed correct. This is a very common error for inexperienced pilots and pilots flying planes heavier than they’re used to.

That's why they cost tens of millions each

Theyre like largely solid fckin titanium and aluminum

If you built one that can handle great G's, you'd have a flying razor blade! 😬😬😬

@@xfg007 I thought it was just because the military wants to waste the tax dollars haha

@@xfg007thanks captain obvious

lol mate im aussie what about you mate

​@@user-zv7ew5lo1pwhat's being an Australian got to do with anything he said ?

@@kainesun3403I bet you it was the confetti

Actually, if you look very closely, it was NOT the engine that fell apart first, but the vertical stabilizer. In fact, the engine and main bidy stayed intact till the very end. So what are you talking about?😅

TIMMMAAAHHHH @@kainesun3403

They have tons of money, so..they’ll get over it

@@andy86i That's not always the case...

Occupational hazard that goes with this hobby I guess.

I just hope they cleaned up the mess they made.

Most RC clubs have a runway, if not a real street then well trimmed grass fields.

Ass huge

Given that at 1:48 you can see some glider trailers I suspect this is an airfield for glider planes. They should provide the perfect condition for these kind of events.

that guy fuchs

What are you talking abo- oooohhh...

It's pronounced "Fuooks"

​@@niallproud7450 Jared?

🤣🤣🤣

Don’t forget : they cost $1000s to build.

Oh, you a devil

@@Danin4985 Ohhh, that renders the crash even more pleasurable 🤤🤤🤤!!!

@@Shifftee I may resemble that remark.

Perfect timing! 😂

I forgot i said this

​@@gamer-fe9edwooosh

@@gamer-fe9ed🎉that’s the joke🎉

@@gamer-fe9ed Really, ya think?

​@@gamer-fe9ed😮🤯

Especially the “oh, Scheiße!” part!

He didn't make it, buddy! 😥

You beat me to it, was just going to say the same thing!!

Lol

THEY’RE HERE TO MUTILATE US!!! RUN! 😂

Reminded me of the TU 144 Le Bourget event. Except 2 supersonics crashed at the same time instead of 1

Thankfully Vanoss knew how to fly a plane

🤬🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡👿👿👿😡😡👿👿😡👿👿😡👿🤪😡😡😡👿😡👿😡😡👿😡👿😡

Too much speed sound

You and most of the people in here watching them 🤣🤣

😂😂

Yep, absolutely 🤣🤣

Yup, total lack of respect.

Give em a brake they had just lost there 1/2 scale pilot.

Yeah I noticed that 😂

I guess because they are not actively killing birds, lol

@@marcoporro Dont start lol Nor is fishing for a hobby. That is why in the Netherlands catch and release is not only allowed but law lol Germany is one of the only countries out of two I think in Europe that do not allow it, catch and release does not kill anything, that is why recaptures of the exact same fish are so regular in some lakes. Anyway, you did not start but I did, sorry lol. But it is an argument because they say, causing them stress for a hobby is the reason, this causes birds stress to fly loud planes around them lol Anyway it is what it is, I still love watching these guys fly them here and I still drive all of the way to the Netherlands to go fishing, so its all good lol

@@Pobsta-de7hb oh no, let me be clear, I have nothing against fishing. I am just saying that more people fish than fly, and there is a more direct impact (you are voluntarily disturbing/injuring fishes vs just possibly and unintentionally disturbing birds), so it's easier to see why people are more concerned with fishing. And even then, in my country I think you almost always have to have a permit on public areas to fly drones or planes (but it might be mostly related to accidentally crashing on people, idk)

@@marcoporro Gawd knows, I am just a whinging old guy and I hate the ban on catch and release fishing here but I am not alone, many do. It is all this peta group or something they are called, but apparently letting your dogs crap where ever they want, leaving rubbish everywhere walking them, cats breeding in the streets by the thousand so theres a massive over population of street cat issues, the largest pet shop having puppies, kittens, monkey and all sorts down the road from me, all look sad and depressed, is ok with them though but not me fishing with my son lol As for flying, I am not sure whether the guys that fly their planes etc here need permits by law etc, perhaps so. I just enjoy watching them and watching them freely enjoy their hobby that they love, whilst I cant lol Who knows, maybe I will learn to fly these things and take up a new hobby lol

@@Pobsta-de7hb fly an RC helicopter and use it to fish, lol. Catch two fishes with one stone ahah

Wasn’t a Mig it was a Gripen

It was 1 Boeing and 1 airbus lol. and that’s a gripen not a mig

They all stalled.

High bank angle, too much aero dynamic forces, too high angle of attack

HAHAHA!

Not really. This one was way underpowered.

@@goku445he meant like how they crash

@@Aviation_Videos123 I knew what he meant.

Mate flip you there was only 1 Concorde crash

Wasn't that an excuse SpaceX used once? lol

@@darkwoodmovies yep! April 2023 when a test flight failed 🤣

ksp1 players

That and its producing decent enough speed, the outer shell of these RCs are limited in what kinda material they can use, at least in show regulations but they come made that way.

poor construction using weak balsa wood for too large airframe. Hilariously embarrassing failure

No it’s too much stress in the airframe I think

Could be caused by too many g-forces or overspeed

It was a Saab

All part of the requirements probably at a public event.

That's a 5 grand jet engines, if you can save it or at least parts of it that's worth a try.

@@oddities-whatnotno that was on a private airfield. They tried to suffocate the fire with dirt but it didn’t work

@@user-lv7ph7hs7lwhat you mean is EDFs, right? Jet engines would be overkill on an airliner

@@MrPoopYTP No they do make RC sized real jet engines, compressor stages, combustion chamber, nozzle, fan, bypass or none. 2-3 grand a pop. Before EDF it used to be more common, now of course you can get high performance EDF like many do for airliners, but with fighter jets it's still common to use actual turbines. It's not that expensive compared to the rest of the thing, some spend 20 grand one toys like that. I will try to add a link for the popular manufacturer but YT sometimes doesn't allow links but easy to find "rc jet engine" anything below 2 grand is EDF. Above there is fire. And noise. They make a lovely roar like a proper aircraft.

Air New Zealand

npc comment

@@Chris-nn3vu good one

Very interesting to see a stall like that.

We never can evolve if one mishappening stops us from ever trying again. Result, we haven't evolved in decades.

There was so much pressure on the Rc plane so it exploded in mid air

I saw an explanation in another video where this is included and I think the pilot tried to fix the angle by changing the rudder direction which put it into that much strain it ripped off, thus the plane lost the ability to stay straight and at that speed the air resistance is too big for it to not tear apart when suddenly going vertical.

@@ayeshafaisal949 correction on your lack of intelligence, the planes structure was to weak for THATS speed stressing the tail and so on.

@@desynx9571 hahaha you're the one lacking intelligence for posting such reply.

@@goku445 please delete this, you are embarrassing yourself, smh.