😊😊😊😊q😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Well said 👍

Such a great comment. I know a great deal of folks who have such anger at the system but invest so much energy in conspiracies about all sorts of wild explanations when in reality , it's not all that complicated when you learn about the inner workings of capitalism and its monopolistic and exploitative tendencies.

You are not alone!

he should intervew 1dime radio

Actually that's not how it ends but everyone knows how this is going to end.

A thousand times like

@@jacobclay4263 ☢️☢️☢️

@@TacticalMayo Mr. Mayo, the dressing that doesn't like facts.

​@@TacticalMayo Poor tactical mustard, still dreaming of a nuclear Holocaust that will save his rotten empire of flag waving corruption and crime. Well if things ever get to that, you can always climb in Trump's ass to save yourself. Make sure you take your flag with you.😂🤣😆

Is that what Marxism inspired in Russia and China, peace and justice?

You regard U.Mass as a prestigious university?

I, too, am getting my college education and more, online. For free, mostly. We live in marvelous times! Solidarity, comrade!

MAY GOD BLESSING YOU THE WHOLE FAMILY

Exactly. Instead, they throw insults like "damned communists" etc. According to them, communists are also responsible for LGBT, wokeism and progressivism. I then tell them that this nonsense (wokeism and progressivism) could only have emerged in capitalism and that this bunch of people would have ended up in labor and re-education camps as subversive elements in the former Eastern Bloc.

@@zaggy3110 That appears to be the problem with Western Society....... The propaganda appears to have been created in the 1950's to produce the image of repression, in the Nations on the other side of the Iron Curtain. The image created by the Western Investor Class has been embedded in the thoughts of US Citizens.

Because religion is typically antithetical to class imbalances, it favors progress towards class balance in society. Therefore, it’s in the interests of the ruling class to co-opt religion in their favor, since religion is by nature popular.

@@edwinvargas7969 The Layers of Religious organizations that provide the flow of funds to keep the Churches Shiney, involves many loyal Servants within the structire of the Church, to afford to polish the shoes of the Guardians of the Vatican, and Wall Street. We should define the Ruling Class as the Citizens who are capable of being self supported, by their Trust Funds or any Other endowment they may have stumbled into. They are the People with enough disposable income to buy Political Prostitutes. Many of the Alter Boys who haunt Trading Firms in Chicago or New York, allow the flow of funds that Religion can provide to support profits, in a fashion similar to the use of Advertising Firms. The Profits that Tribute Payments made possible for Roman Citizens, have developed profits for Brokers since the USA applied a Hostile Takeover of the Spanish Empire.

​@@edwinvargas7969It's cute that you think that

Collecting wealth is sick ADD immaturity (not grown up). Will destroy society because they don't try to understand the value of the Social System

CORRECTION: Professor Wolff is a socialist so your BEST hand has to be your LEFT hand 👍...

And a fucking great looking shirt !

@@ChadHarding-dx5re you sanctioned china recently becuse you don't believe in free market lol. this guy is delusional

A great leader

Shame that the field doesn't consider him a benchmark.

They literally lost to every country after ww2 😂😂

They only have nukes and that’s it

Rest in Power

McAlevey's NO SHORTCUTS belongs next to Alinsky's RULES FOR RADICALS on every leftists bookshelves.

Life will kill you. Also, if those are your concerns, complaining about wealth inequality becomes a total contradiction, and you would need to return to pre-industrial conditions immediately.

No, No because the Capitalist were too busy to think about it. Money 💰 was coming by the Tons !!! Algore worried about Climate Change but they ignored him 😂😂😂

Have you won when those other buyers do not reside in your own country?

Wolff is still cowering from the last pandemic, and since it is not over, with many more in the pipeline, future lectures will probably see him in level 4 bio lab gear.

@@jgalt308 Good one.

🙏🙏🙏

🎯🎯🎯

@@micnorton9487 Thanks.

The use of Capital to make a small number of Humans Wealthy increase has made the destruction of Nature possible. Perhaps we can live without Capital as a measure of Value?

@danielhutchinson6604 yes, I'd like that.

@@timmoore3188 So spread the word that we should consider that policy.....

@@danielhutchinson6604 okay

That Colonial Conflict was the origin of the Contemporary view of conflicts. Fighting the Forces of "Evil" to a standstill..... How are we doing so far?

​@@danielhutchinson6604The new housing developments that are being built and distributed for free in North Korea look pretty nice. And it looks like trade and infrastructure projects with Russia and China are on their way to making US sanctions ineffective.

Socialism = collectivism. It's worth noting that communism and capitalism can both be individualistic and collectivistic, therefore, socialism isn't mutually exclusive with capitalism _or_ communism. Collectivistic capitalism is characterized by an organized working class who are ready to build unions, worker cooperatives, boycotts, and strikes in a moment's notice. Collectivistic communism is characterized by an organized working class who are ready to elect better representatives in a moment's notice, in order to write better economic policy. For all intents and purposes, there is no difference between collectivistic capitalism and collectivistic communism. Strong unions (free-market capitalism) and good economic policy (communism) are just two different ways for the working class to appropriately distribute the means of production. On the other hand, individualistic capitalism is characterized by a divided working class and a powerful ruling class. That ruling class will often infiltrate the government and create a state-corporate merger. Individualistic communism is characterized by an authoritarian government that controls the means of production to benefit themselves, because the working class was too divided to elect better representatives. Again, for all intents and purposes, there is no difference between individualistic capitalism and individualistic communism. A working class who is unwilling or unable to organize to build strong unions or to elect better representatives will be ruled by the oligarchs all the same. Oligarchy, kleptocracy, corporatocracy, and plutocracy are all effectively the same thing, and they can operate within a capitalistic or communistic economy _if_ the working class is divided. The compartmentalization of government control of the economy and free-market control of the economy are just two different ways to view the control over the distribution of resources. The working class either controls the distribution of the means of production by democratizing the workplace, by electing people to write good economic policy, or they fail to do either. Which strategy they choose is irrelevant the outcome, and in fact, they can do a little bit of both. The means of production are either controlled and distributed by and for a small few or by and for the masses. It's not capitalism vs socialism, it's collectivism vs individualism. United we stand, divided we fall.

That's truly the dumbest thing I've heard outside trump rants. China invaded, killed , burned and subdued just like every other powers nir to mention that under the cover of socialism, some of the greatest monstrosities were committed. Get your head out of your a**.

@@limitisillusion7 communism is not facism, communism = advanced socialism = a society where the capital can not exploit labors over profits, so far, no country has ever achieved communism, however, communism could be achieved if advanced technology takes over, for example, when AI robots take over all human jobs, products and service are rich in society, governments have to upgrade to advanced socialism that is to distribute products& service to every citizen in relatively fair way no matter whether the citizen have jobs or not.

​@@limitisillusion7 State and government existed for one reason only that is to serve the people. Worker unions are not necessarily needed as if the government truely serve the people, in primary capitalism stage, it is government duty to negotiate benefits between the capitalists and working class. i.e. the government shall be enpowered to control the capitalists , and the government can not be controlled by lobbist who are backed by the capitalists. i.e. citizen vote government admin to control the capitalists, citizen did not vote the capitalists to control the government.

@@limitisillusion7 when elected government does not serve the people = corruption, this exists in socialist China CPC and USA too, China crash down corruption every year, 1 to 3 % CPC officials will be put in jail if they are corrupted. while USA systematically allow corruption, for example, lobby system.

Trust me that's not what's going to happen.

Utopia is the engine of progress.

@@TacticalMayo The future is unknown.

@@Gezira oh yes it is. We 🇺🇲 will make sure of it.

Yes, he is doing his part ...maintaining all that and "ignorance" as well.

and WRONG!!!!!

Thinking logically appears to be Banned by Capitalism?

Why are there sanctions imposed by the Us on the chinese imported EV's of 100% tariffs, while no sanctions or tariffs on commodities like gold,silver,cobalt,lithium from african countries?Simple answer is that the mines are exploited by Anglo- american and De Beers corporations..! Brics+ will start sanctioning the Us and Eu elite by trading with the Brics+ countries. The West will therefore sanctioning themselves. Goodbye western unipolar hegemony.

Duck...here comes Voyager!!!!

Agree,, Wall Street sees this as an existential crisis also,, a threat to cutthroat capitalism...

Thank you!

But found none of his actual books?

​@@jgalt308Not in that section. This was the hardcore economics section. When I saw Richard Wolff there I knew he runs in high intellectual circles, but he doesn't put on airs about it. I'm guessing his books are more geared to a general audience than the Ecyclopedia. But if you really want to know what Prof. Wolff knows, I think the Encyclopedia is the best starting point.

Why? Wolff will never write "The Confessions of a Failed Marxist."

@@jgalt308y porqué no escribes tú otro sobre in resentido en sentido nitzcheano fracasado?.

@@carlossenequiert4791 Because the point of it doesn't involve me writing anything. It was a suggestion for the would-be author as a commenter on this site. Also, being a "failed millennial" is hardly a novel statement...on a site selling victimhood. If it was a suggestion to me...I would inquire as to your reasoning for it?