Whenever I play the stonewall my opponents always play KID or just Pf5 and then I have like 0 chance to attack on the king side

Ha ha! Kids these days 😀

Hating something doesn't mean you don't understand why it is good to know ☺️

​@@briansledzzz3493you can try some gambito against f5 orrr you start whit 1f4 its tricky but you can transposes into a stonewall

​@@briansledzzz3493 Your opponent always has a veto--you can't generally *force* an attack in any opening unless you play a dubious but sharp gambit like the Blackmar-Diemer. But FWIW I've discovered that in the Stonewall you *can* actually get away with a kingside pawnstorm even vs. a black kingside fianchetto and have an ok position... though unless your opponent messes up it usually won't transform into a very serious attack (you have to be satisfied just with having the extra space.) But the first fix to any "my opponent messes it up" issue is mess around with move order and transpositions, try to find something that leads more often to positions you like (though you'll need to learn and adjust to new sidelines.) In terms of transpositions, I've had some success hybridizing it with either a Trompowsky or a Colle (either Zukertort or a Koltanowski.) Sometimes you'll be able to transpose from those openings into favorable attacking Stonewall lines (with the bonus of having dealt with your bad bishop, in the case of the Colle-Z or Tromp), though you have to be ready for other stuff to happen which won't lead to Stonewall positions. I've also seen other people transpose from Londons, though obviously that only works in lines where you've first moved your bishop off of f4. If you're playing the Stonewall as black you can start with the Dutch and delay d4, hinting at or retaining the option to go into something like the Leningrad instead. (It's a bit more complicated for white because black doesn't have to play d4 in response to Bird's opening. ) I stopped thinking of the Stonewall as just "the attacking opening" a while back and started looking at it as being more about locking down the center while retaining the possibility of opening it up later on (which is an option only white has. Black can't break open the center without dubious sacrificial play.) That's really its overriding theme: center control. Sometimes you get to leverage that control in the form of a vigorous kingside attack, sometimes not. If you can't attack on the kingside then start trying to think about if it's possible to work towards busting open the center (with e4) and if so, whether it would be to your advantage (it usually helps activate your bad bishop, for instance.) Vs. Bf5, you can try to get rid of it with Nh4 at some point. Another more tedious option that is better than it looks at first is to trade bishops with Bd3. Leads to a slower game with black having queenside play (and a slight objective advantage, which doesn't matter much if you're familiar with it), but you retain control of the center and a kingside attack is sometimes possible if he gets too aggressive on the queenside. But a more common situation (especially in short time controls) is black ends up being too passive, and you have the potential to make gradually improving moves while he shuffles aimlessly.

🙏

Great to hear!

💪

I mean, anything is honestly great in the 600 elo range so long as you memorize more than 3 moves of theory.

If Black plays c6, they don't attack your center and thus it's easier for you to play.

🙏

It's not game over, this attitude blocks further learning. Just study the QG opening and find correct moves against Kings Indiana... Don't run away 🤣😂😂

Either Rd8 or long castle, black loses the exchange as rook is 2 points higher than a minor piece.

🤣

I'm rated 1800 online and have won 70% of my games after Nb5 it's very good and is recommended by some of the best players to play the opening

Yes indeed, White may either go Nb5 or a3 to prevent the pin. However, this relates to advanced level players. Beginner-intermediate players rarely play Bb4 in this position anyway, and so it's fine to not worry about it.

The white bishop is protecting the knight

Jomama London

Jopapa london

Josista london

How about "Obama London"? 😏

​@@GMIgorSmirnov 😂 🎉

👍

yes, but "the knight on the rim is dim"

Just play e3 if he takes recapture and other just develop you other pieces to the typical positions from an accelerated London system

Just play normal London

Englund gambit is losing, Stockfish even evaluates the first move as blunder

@@JoseDownUnder yeah if you play against a computer but against humans it works well 😂

@@prplt few guys tried it against me (in Lichess in the last few days ) and I beat all of them. There are better gambits to try - like the Budapest

Lmao that stupid comment doesn't apply here, jobava London is solid till super high levels

@@bullymaguire8266 well in queen pawn opening moves as c3 or c4 are oxygen for developt ur queen, the knight on c3 has the main purpose to attack c7 with the bishop, and after moves as a6, the knight there in c3 with the pawn on c2, is not a big deal, yeah ur kight guards good square on the centre, but the pawn on c file with be stuck for a while

Italian game, scotch gambit, fried liver.

Go for Ruy lopez .There is tons of theory but if you can master it you can reach atleast a Fide master. I play Italian only.That's why I am 🥺1500elo .Because everyone knows everything in Italian I prefer Ruy lopez If you dream to reach 1400 quickly bishops opening and scotch Gambit can help you a lot Go for Sicilian with black or king pawn game (my fav)

Openings won't get you from 890 to 900 - or indeed beyond. Tactics and middle game play are the way to get better. Openings are mainly about getting your pieces into good positions and surviving the first few moves sensibly - it you win with a trap, that's a bonus.

@@SenseiSathya Nobody can reach FIDE master just by working out an opening in depth. You need strategy as well as tactics, middlegame and endgame ability, etc. Most players hit a wall far below that. 99% will never reach FM however hard they try and whatever openings they memorise in detail.

@@iankemp1131 If you study an opening in depth your strategy and tactics will surely improve.But studying an opening like Ruy lopez or Sicilian is not an easy task and it takes more than a lifetime to complete, anyways you can study most of it (Tricks ,traps ,Ideas, plans middle game plans ,endgame plans etc )

😅

Happy to help!