Based on how deep those carvings are though. I'm leaning more towards male/man did that, and yeah as a man myself, guys do stupid crap high, and get into fights, and break and scratch and wwf destroy tables and windows, and when morning comes "Oh dude did I do that, man I'm sorry I'll pay you back bro" and it's all cool bro, and they are buddies again. Women between other Women, don't break any property, and usually seldom never get rid of grudges and they just don't talk anymore, or just catfight it out, and never speak again. I honestly feel you have it reversed, and men usually slash tires, furniture, break windows. I honestly feel Defendant, she is being blamed. idk.

Are you a guy ? A guy may key a car but he wouldn’t do that to old furniture, smash it maybe but not scratch it it ! Smashing it to pieces and it is know more, scratching it all over it’s still functional but a reminder every day you get up and look at and that’s a woman thing !

@@billmoran3219 I am a guy yes, and to me just looking at those carving marks, I don't see Defendant she being able to physically do that. Like to me that was definitely a man that had strong brute strength and was also probably high idk. If Plaintiff didn't himself admit he had shady homeboys, I probably wouldn't be as sus about it but idk.

@@billmoran3219 Nailed it👌👍!

​@@taralen1101it isn't difficult to make those scratches (for a man or woman) depending on what was used.

A girl i known for a few days burned a big FU in my backyard, at first I was like where is it and my friend said you are STANDING on top of the letter F.

@@asianconnection7701 what did you do to her?🤣

@@NaomiIsSoAwesome98 I was young and dumb at the time, she asked me who I thought was prettier, her or her friend and I said her friend. lol

@@asianconnection7701

What’s funny though is the defendant claim they dated a couple of months when she told Doug 🤣 one of them is busting too much pot and lying.

I got a good laugh

Thought she said art work

I thought she was attractive looking nice lady, I'd date her if she's into younger men 😜

Lmao if a male judge had said o lawd😂😂

that’s what I thought she said too 🤣 artwork from a peeved woman lol

😂😂😂

Yes, she was just giving herself away. with all the crap she was saying as the case kept going. She might have been a great pool player, but toss her outta there! Total head case!!!

I'd love to see the early seasons

Yeah. I noticed that too. They should put the original air dates in the description.

She sure did😂

Word.

Her lying mouth proves her guilt

"It works 😀"

Maybe if you're a fan of President Grover Cleveland for some reason.

Ernie or Cookie Monster maybe never Grover !

😂

Family name

She did not want to be with him.

The ex gf lady was Hot, I thought her accent was sexy, I'm from the valley so that country accent is nice

@@AriesHeat-xq5pp🤢🤮plz stop

I agree that this is the handiwork of an angry woman. As far as the dresser, though, is it possible that the hardware was replaced at some point with a newer style?

Smash vs scratch. We know who is who 😂

Bc this isn't criminal court. In cival court a judge can base her rulings of her gut/instinct. Another words if either partys stories don't add up or sounds odd or off,then she can rule in the other parties favor. In criminal court you must prove beyond the shadow of a doubt..

I know she did it isn't evidence, but whatever.😂

​@@kingoffarts8352 Also of note, this show is actually binding arbitration, not court. JM can rule however she wants, she just tends to follow the rules of civil court.

🤣🤣🤣

Because this is small claims court, and it basically is gambling/luck what the judge/arbitrator decides is fair, and it's usually down to loopholes, or just settling/mediating gripes. Although there is zero evidence she did it, the judge/Milian in this case feels she is still liable so it's not a criminal case to where someone is guilty/convicted without reasonable doubt; It's small claims to where non criminal settlements are binding to reach a resolution. She wasn't charged with anything criminal (vandalism/destruction), she was the party the arbitrator felt was responsible for civil damages, so whether she did it or not is moot. But yeah.

Why is he a loser? Cuz he didn't want her?

@@LajaHiggins He's on welfare because he's a lazy bum.

Thank you. And based on the gruesome pictures of the furniture being carved up. a hundred percent a man did that, and that man was probably one of the Plaintiff's buddies who he had beef with, or maybe it wasn't intentional and he had a bad trip or something either or etc. Women usually pour bleach on his clothes, throw his suit jackets and stuff on the front lawn, throw his baseball cards on the floor etc. petty stuff lol. That was definitely a guy just based on those pictures lol. So at most Defendant got a man to do that, so in a way she's still necessarily being truthful she didn't do it, lol, but I don't think she did it period and sadly was unlucky she was in their friend group and the blame was put on her somehow smh.

Ohh..I was 11

How did you know that?

@@katec4096 Looked it up

I wholeheartedly disagree. Defendant says she didn't do it, and my gut believes her. As a man myself so yeah. Just based on those pictures alone how deep the carvings are, that was definitely a man, and a man who was high and probably isn't on friendly terms with the Plaintiff either lol (just also going on Plaintiff admitting he has questionable buddies/associates, so yeah). Women do very petty things cut up/rip like t shirts, and they don't even cut up, they usually pour bleach, or pour ketchup stains on his clothes etc. throw his video games and shoes on the front lawn etc. Men usually are the ones who do more war zone stuff like slash tires, rip up sofas, furniture, smash windows etc. so yeah. lol. Just my opinion.

@taralen1101 Simp, I was married 28 years once. She did it. Judge found so too, so it really doesn't matter what anyone thinks.

Because she's a under cover witch 🪄 it's magical and a horrible one at that (You go girl) At least you got something back I made sure!! of that 😢😢

Funny watching this in this decade, stoned and legally getting pain relief for cancer

7 weeks is almost 2 months. That's a couple

You tried too hard trying to make a pot joke. The ex obviously just rounded up.

6 or 7 weeks is a couple of months

Yep where they are automatically guilty because who would ever lie about that!

How do you know it was weed and not cigarettes?

She said it was pot, he didn’t deny it

Give her 5 more minutes and Porky, Alfalfa and Darla would have been in the story 😅