Thanks for watching. You can't do a valid head to head as the infrared of each unit will interfere. Yeah that was my bad I thought it updated and did not.

Could you compare them both to a trackman?

Thanks for watching!

Hopefully you can shoot me an email and snag one through one of my partners to help support the Channel :-) a98cr125@gmail.com

Those numbers are not correct it was estimating thinking it saw stickers from EYE XO. They have addressed this. MINI does not measure face angle at least as of now.

I think it will do well considering it has infrared and a solid hitting area. Really appreciate you guys commenting and watching. I have always enjoyed your channel. Maybe some day we can catch a round together!

@BryanBrosGolf I should have also mentioned, I plan on doing outdoor testing but unfortunately it is 40 and rainy in Michigan still! SMH

@BryanBrosGolf We did some testing with irons and driver last night and so far so good. The impact image and video looks great too and it was getting dark outside. kzfaq.info5xEagzd7Syo

Very interested to hear this response as well!

I have only had just over 24 hours with it lol So I really can't speak on that. I think though it comes down to more personal preference to the user. Which software they prefer like FSX pro or Play VS View / Refine etc.

I know, I just had to run out the door by the time it was noticed. Fixing in a few. Thanks

Yep

It is region locked for USA and Canada only.

Yeah I would assume the other side units could do the same in theory, but UNEEKOR is the first to bring it and it really is nice. Thanks for watching.

@@GolfSimulatorVideos I wonder if camera the physically moves in the the quad/GC3 to allow it to capture that kind of video.

@@danielmcdonald8149 not sure.

@@danielmcdonald8149 I think it's possible that the Quad/GC3 is not actually using super high speed video, but instead using slower cameras combined with a high speed strobe system. There claim of 10,000 fps video back with GC2 always screamed BS to me, there's no way you could get 2 cameras with any meaningful resolution at that framerate for what they charged or even in that form factor.

@@danielmcdonald8149 It doesn't move on the mini either. Its just a wider camera view that crops the image to the ball then moves the frame of the video, not the actual camera itself

It’s going to be a little difficult to do that since you can’t use two of the side launch monitors at once, because the infrared interferes with each other. It’s possible you could compare it to eye xo which has been proven to have top level accuracy. I’ve only had the unit for a single day, so just getting settled.

@@GolfSimulatorVideos Can you compare using the trackman? Like GC3 vs the trackmann then Mini vs the trackman?

@@GolfSimulatorVideos Test with trackman or EyeXO? Those are the premium launch monitors right?

@@danielmcdonald8149 so Trackman is not my go to for indoor benchmark. I have tested a little with. EYE XO And even though some shots are identical I’m also seeing some interference occasionally. So going to be tough to see what would be a good comparison.

Camera will always be more precise for short chipping and putting just as it measures in a short distance. Mevo+ was stated from the beginning for putts over 5’ I want to say. It does really well, plenty good for most but camera has an advantage indoors especially for things like that.

Yes, I just have it at the tournament speed of 11. You can dial it in to match your turf. Thanks for watching!

I think I did test the putting and you get the swing path video and impact image etc. I think what you are asking calls for a video for EYE MINI putting going over all of that! Stay tuned :)

The MINI does not provide face impact location since it is a single dot unit. Those data points are for EYE XO and EYE XO 2.

You need either the basic subscription at $199 per year or unlocked license which includes everything in a perpetual format for $2000

You don’t. It’s one or the other. VIEW sends the data to 3rd party software. The only reason to run the connector is if you want to save some PC usage. Many people run VIEW on another screen to see the path video and data while playing other software

It is going to be tough since infrared can interfere, but I am working on some options. Thanks for watching.

There are many factors to consider. Why don’t you shoot me a quick email and I’m happy to discuss everything with you. a98cr125@gmail.com

Great question, I thought it was updated but it is possible I missed the update because I am always on Ultra :)

@@johnrush7331 yeah I thought it updated. I know how it works but was more focused on mini and overlooked it, my bad. 🤷‍♂️

So far, all of my numbers are matching up well with other launch monitors. It’s going to be tough to really do an accuracy test because you can’t compare it to another side launch monitor he does infrared interferes.

@@GolfSimulatorVideos You might be able to do the LH/RH trick where you have one of the side monitors on the same side you're hitting from. It feels awkward to swing that way at first but you get used to it. Just not sure if the two sets of strobes would interfere with each other.

Its not going to come close to the Quad in accuracy. The EyeXO is not even nearly as accurate as the Quad

@@GolfSimulatorVideos Use a trackmann to compare

@@ben1ben2ben1 Trackman is ok indoors but I don’t benchmark with it. The spin axis is calculated.

Mini looks like it gives face angle ? But the manufacturer website doesn’t say that.

I mean “better” might come down to more personal preference. It doesn’t require marked balls but for those wanting an east out of the way overhead for right / left play etc they might prefer QED

@@chachifeereno that number is not being measured. I showed them that and they will most likely remove that number one mini is being used that way people don’t rely on the data. They did say they would see if they could backwards calculate into the number but it’s not measuring face angle.

@@GolfSimulatorVideos Hi, you mean we wont be able to see/know in the future if the face is open or not at impact ?? thats important info, maybe I misunderstood

@@Chris-mr8qm you can “see” the face in the video but the face angle data point at this time at least is not a measured data point and they are not stating it as a provided data point