"The discovery led to some stiff questions popping up that were too hard for Scott to answer" This is the content I subscribed for, thank you Dr. Grande

I grew up in California and this was the biggest story for months; can’t believe how long ago this was now. So sad to think Connor would have been 21 this year.

Its so terrible this happened to her. She had the most beautiful smile I've ever seen.

If I had gone fishing on Christmas day, my wife would have disappeared, too. She would have packed up and gone back to her parents' house.

The FIRST day of the neighborhood search he pestered his neighbor a real estate agent with questions about how much his house would appraise. She went home and thought he did something to his wife.

Scott needs to stay behind bars forever

- The guy tells his mistress that his wife is already dead. - He buys a boat. - He travels 100 miles to use the boat for the first time in the hours before Christmas. - His wife disappears the same morning he’s using the boat. - His wife is found in the same place where he used the boat, which again, is 100 miles from where they lived. What are the odds of that being just a coincidence? Maybe one in 100 trillion? These people from the Innocence Project need to find a different hobby.

He displayed duper's delight on many occasions, and is a narcissist, who will never admit accountability for what he did.

Rest in peace 🙏 Laci Denise Rocha Peterson and 8-month unborn Connor Peterson ⚘⚘

An innocent man would have been desperately searching for his wife and child. Instead he was calling his mistress pretending to be in Paris watching the New Years celebration as a single man. I really cant believe that this organization is trying to free this man. This world makes no sense anymore. Show the evidence that can clear this man or move on.

"The police found Viagra pills which led to some stiff questions popping up, that were too hard for Scott to answer." Poetic magnificence 😆!

Im a fisherman. No one buys a boat , buys only a 3 day license, and dont know what they are fishing for when asked.

Prayers to Laceys loved ones. I cannot imagine them having to deal with this load of bs

People are confusing two different entities. The Los Angeles Innocence Project is wholly independent of the Innocence Project.

The innocent project is trying to help the wrong person. He is guilty as charged, and should rot underneath of the jail.

He bought a bass boat with a open bow and a shallow draft this is perfect for bass fishing in a lake like the one next to the golf course he played at , he drove past 3 rivers and lake McClure on his way to Berkeley. Fishing in the San Francisco bay alone in December in that boat is insane.

Who goes fishing 90 miles away on Christmas Eve and leaves his wife who is 8 months pregnant alone? I’m in total agreement with you Dr Grande.

Imagine being innocent in prison and hearing the innocent project is busy working on this case. "Sorry we're busy with the guy who went fishing on the day his wife disappeared in the cold rain."

There is A LOT more to the story. Scott made it clear to everyone including Lacy that he did not want a child. He tried to sell their house and her car while she was only thought to be missing.

The one piece of evidence I can't let go of was that Scott claimed that he decided to go fishing at the last minute because of the weather, after telling his friends and family that he'd be golfing, but he bought a fishing license on 12/20, good only for 12/23 and 12/24. Clearly he had intentions to go fishing before Christmas Eve, if he truly had nothing to do with Laci's murder why would he lie about that? It's certainly no smoking gun but in addition to all the other shit Scott did it's what takes me over the edge into thinking he's guilty

His most damning statement to Amber "This will be my first Christmas alone". This was BEFORE he murdered Laci.

I believe that Scott (along with Chris Watts, never thought for a second that their wives "disappearance" wou!d capture national attention.

If I’m not mistaken, Scott claimed to be in Paris when he was actually at a vigil for Laci. So at his wife’s vigil in Modesto, he was on the phone with his mistress telling her that he was in Paris.

I saw the A&E special. It shed more light on a lot things that were not presented in trial.

I watched this whole case. He sure sounds guilty with all the evidence

He totally did it

I always enjoy the cheeky dry humour. Always a pleasure Dr. Grande !

It's shocking that people are trying to free this killer.

“The burglars held on to Lacy’s body and dumped her in the San Francisco Bay.”😂😂 He’s guilty as sin and will not be able to overcome the fact that his wife and baby washed ashore not far from where he was fishing. May he rot in prison.

Scott forgot to include in his statement: "I am also a pathological liar & psychopath."

He is ABSOLUTELY GUILTY NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER

guilty as charged I hope he never gets out of jail, unless it’s in a box

OMG! Are they serious?? How could anyone think he was innocent???

Still weird seeing that house. I was a delivery driver at the time and Modesto was on my route, I delivered about five doors down. When all this was going on, the street and address was mentioned on the news, quickly connected the dots, somewhat surreal all this was going on at the time. Dude is guilty, always has been, and unless there's some sort of definitive proof, he'll be locked away for a very long time. There's a ton of evidence all the way to him having his brother's ID, a number of cell phones and thousands of dollars in cash on the day he was finally apprehended, that's not including everything else. Dude is a killer.

This case is so cut and dry to his guilt you don't have to catch someone in the act to know they did it , the circumstantial evidence builds up and becomes a photograph of the crime , most of these criminals are psychopaths who's hubris makes them believe they can out smart the police when in fact the police have so much experience in these types of crimes that the guilt or innocence is already known before they investigate the case fully due to all the mistakes the perpetrator makes in committing the crime .

The circumstantial evidence was overwhelming. He is guilty.

I'm fishing, but i don't know what for. I make cement anchors, but who knows why. I need to know what the currents are so I know where the fish that I don't know I'm fishing for might be. I always tell my mistress I'm in Paris when I am at a search vigil for my missing wife that I am divorcing....with the help of a cement anchor. 🤬

He killed her. He has a narcissistic personality and wanted to live the good life and a future child was an obstacle to his life style.

Four hours of driving 2 there and 2 back for 30 minutes of fishing when you have don Pedro reservoir 15 minutes from your house next to your favorite golf course

Ive seen the latest interview with Lacys Mom.... She's just existing 😣 Prayers for her❤

IMO, this was case of no direct evidence but an incredible quantity of circumstantial evidence that, when combined, points to his guilt.

So guilty! If he gets out of jail then there is NO justice in this world.

This guy is obviously guilty. He didn't even put much effort into covering his tracks and he's not the brightest of the bunch. Why would his case be part of the "innocence project" is beyond me..

This guy is as innocent as O.J...

“Stiff questions popping up that were too hard for Scott to answer…” haha Dr Grande did it again, I’m over here laughing too hard

He never told Amber his wife had been "killed". He told her he "lost" his wife.

Once someone thinks you did something, everything becomes evidence of guilt. Cops are especially notorious for this. I keep full camping gear in my trunk, have hiked in the rain, randomly decide to go on trips etc. Cross that with any number of texts, online purchases and online comments across years and all that's missing to prove my guilt is an accusation. I didn't follow the peterson trial, but a lot of the comments here seem to be "I wouldn't have done X, so X is suspicious.". "An innocent person would have done Y and he didn't.". It's like when someone doesn't panic and start crying when they hear a loved one is murdered, and people draw all sorts of conclusions because of the 'incorrect' response.

Scott put himself at the scene of the crime with cement weights ! Guilty

"Some stiff questions popping up that were too hard for Scott to answer." Brilliant Doc! You are a master wordsmith.

The ongoing question...who travels 90 miles to catch fish on Christmas Eve?

"Scott's vehicle was found with Viagra pills. This lead to some stiff questions popping up that were too hard for Scott to answer." Dr Grande is a SAVAGE for that😂😂😂

No one drives all the way from Modesto to Berkeley to go fishing - especially at Christmas. And then he can’t even say what he was fishing for?

He told Amber that Laci was dead even before she went missing. He had it planned already.

If Scott wanted/expected to find his wife alive, he would've immediately confessed the affairs. For all he knew, a scorned, ex lover of his, or partner of a current lover, could've discovered his double life. Perhaps, only taking Laci hostage, in order to expose him publicly? He didn't make that suggestion, though, because he already knew where Laci was. Scott knew Laci would never be coming home. The "justice" Scott so desperately seeks, will eventually come for him. His beautiful wife, and precious baby, can both rest assured of that.

I found a fishing license my ex-wife had purchased. I assume she planned to go with the man she was cheating on me with. She was gone that day, and I was sick with a strange stomach ailment at home (I thought she was at work). I heard noises outside, and luckily, I wasn't asleep, though she had told me to "Make sure you take the medicine. It'll help you sleep." I grabbed my Twelve gauge and found two men I'd never seen before trying to open the back door; they were surprised to see me and dropped the knives in their hands and ran. We are divorced now, But I'm still not sure that she didn't plan on something happening to me.

Innocence project needs to pound sand.

I'd argue that your deadpan sarcasm and calm but brutal savagery always generate an interesting dialogue, Dr. Grande 😂

Scott's IMORAILTY convicted him of the most serious crimes of murdering his family. Nobody tolerated him, having a mistress or declaring his wife dead before her body was discovered. He can't really sell shitttt.😢The innocent project picked a case that will remain dead in the water. There were over 80 examples of guilty behaviors.

I think he's a psychopath, and isn't the brightest bulb on the tree.

"Stiff Questions popping up that were too hard for Scott to answer" LOL!!! I nearly spit out my coffee!

It's horrible that a guy who likely portrayed himself as a loving husband, brother, son etc. had it in him to kill his wife and unborn baby. His lies and actions were enough to convict him. He really didn't seem to care at all that she was gone. He is scary man.

Enjoyed your last statement . . . "a guy that sells fertilizer didn't sell something that stinks" -- perfectly said, you never disappoint. Thank you.

So, if any one of the competing theories were true, then the alternate perpetrator would have to have coincidentally chosen to have driven ninety miles away to dispose of body in the place where Scott was fishing. 90 miles? Not likely my friend.

I often wonder if we're getting to a point at which the public simply isn't capable of performing the duty of a jury.

Most of the so-called "innocent" people who get out on appeal are because of a technicality, not because they didn't commit the crime. As a consequence some dangerous people are being released into society.

So, 11 witnesses say they saw Lacey AFTER Scott went on his fishing trip. If just ONE of those witnesses was correct, then Scott simply could NOT have done this murder. The only way they could find him guilty is if ALL ELEVEN witnesses who say they saw Lacey alive were wrong or lying. That certainly would constitute reasonable doubt to me. The Police disregarded these witnesses statements, i believe, because of something known as "Confirmation bias". The Police believed these witnesses must be wrong, because as stated, they said Lacey was already dead. That's the mental picture they had. Scott's behavior further fed this bias. When we have a picture in our mind of what we believe to be true, the mind tends to look for things to confirm that "picture", and disregard any input to our brain that contradicts that "picture." Pilots face this problem when dealing with issues with their plane because they largely depend on instruments, instruments that can, at times, give contradictory information. Faced with this contradictory information, the brain reverts to Confirmation Bias. Our brains tend to look for information that confirms what we think to be true, and disregard information that contradicts that picture. Confirmation Bias, has, unfortunately cost the lives of many passengers and crew on airliners, so this is no joke, nor just a theory. Hopefully, it will not cost Scott Peterson HIS life, as well. As he is facing the death penalty, this is just too real a phenomenon. Police are trained to trust their "gut." They're also taught that the killer is usually someone close, forming a mental picture very quickly that can easily lead to confirmation bias. Just look at the Vallejo Police handling of the Denise Huskins case. They were so blinded by Confirmation Bias, they totally ignored evidence that was staring them in the face. They were 110% sure, ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE they were right. But they were WRONG. Was there other evidence, other signs, which the Police investigating Scott dismissed because their theory was already "confirmed" by this kind of bias? For instance, were any boats stolen in the area following the murder, a boat that those burglars seen in the neighborhood might have used to dump the body in the Bay after hearing on the news about Scott's boat, if they indeed committed the crime? Did the Police even think about that, or look to see? Did they even test the blood found in the Van found burned? Or, were they, also, 110% sure, ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE they were right? Though I can't say for sure one way or the other, regarding Scott's guilt or innocence, I do know the death penalty is FINAL. With eleven witnesses to explain away, I personally think the Death sentence should be reconsidered. If you doubt, watch the Mentour Pilot youtube channel, you'll see how real, AND DEADLY, Confirmation Bias is. Also remember, there is no physical or forensic evidence to support a guilty verdict. Most people who aren't career criminals make mistakes, leave evidence behind. Yet there is none. Put someone to death based on THAT? Trial by Media, IMHO.

It was told that the first thing Lacy did upon arising everyday, was open the front curtain/drapes. They were closed that morning. I know a lot of people that have a certain things they do routinely. You don’t skip them. If we are to believe she was kidnapped while walking her dog, the closed curtains make no sense. Scott Peterson is right where he should be.

I never thought we'd still be talking about Scott Peterson. Can't wait to see what this new evidence is. It would have to be pretty good to make me believe Scott didn't do it. Demeanor is one thing, but I mean, he acted suspicious af in the aftermath.They just had too much on him. I get it's all circumstantial, but there's so much. 🤷 I mean, the affair and the story about his wife being dead, the disguises afterward...I mean he's either guilty or extremely dumb...why would any man being looked at as a suspect in his wife's murder do those things? Guilty or innocent....you don't act like that.

This is the kind of case, no matter how you analyze anything it won't bring back Lacy and Connor. RIP angels. 😞

I grew up in Escalon, next to Modesto, CA. I also briefly went to school with Laci's half siblings. So when the news broke, I too was pregnant with my first child. It devastated me to hear what happened. Throughout the whole ordeal, Laci's family went through absolute HELL!!! And what did Scott Peterson do? Scott only worried about Scott!! He was carrying on multiple affairs, he was so financially in debt, then bought a boat! He didn't even once looked concerned for Laci and their child!!! Scott Peterson proved he is a Narcissist and a psychopath!!! Innocent men don't cheat on their pregnant wives, and they certainly don't get caught trying to flee the country. His family was complacent in helping him try to flee. Laci's own mother knew something was wrong when Scott called her to say, "Laci is missing." He did NOT say, "I can't find Laci!" He said specifically, "Laci's missing." He already knew Laci was dead. He set EVERYTHING UP because he wanted to be with single mom Amber Fry. Scott grew up with a single mother, its not hard to psychoanalysis Scott Peterson!!! He should stay in Prison for life because he is a predator and dangerous!!! Personally, I am really upset that Laci's family has to go through this AGAIN! Its total bs! A whole community was torn apart as well. An innocent man would be trying to find his wife's killer, not wasting time and valuable resources trying to free himself. And that is all that Scott Peterson cares about, himself!!!🤬😫💔

Laci was so beautiful. Heartbreaking to do this to her family. He’s a monster. 💔

bought 90 pounds of cement found in his boat, sold all his wife belongings before they found her, sold her only car, sued her parents to try to get the insurance money.

The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming against Scott. His conviction needs to stand.

This was the guy who, after his wife went missing, attempted to travel to Mexico, carrying $15,000 in cash, dyed his hair blonde, and grew a goatee. Oh, he also told the woman he was having an extramarital affair with that his wife had died. Glad the LA Innocence Project took this case because that sounds like the actions of someone who is innocent.

I remember Lacy's mother asking Scott in the courtroom during her impact statement: "Why couldn't you just divorce her?". That broke my heart. So true. And that Lacey was frightened of water at night yet he dumped her and his son into the murky depths of the bay. A vision like that a parent would never recover from. An evil despicable monster!!!!

A fertilizer salesman, that says a lot! Thank you Dr. Grande for your look into this sad case. I believe he is guilty! He is not an honorable person!

Dear Dr Grande. I agree with your conclusion and admire the deft move from alliteration in your videos to the "subtle" employment of the double entendre to expose this scoundrel's lies!

I never forget how he was telling Amber he is in Paris enjoying New Year 😢 psychopath.Thank You Dr.Grande❤😊❤

Dude, he's guilty as charged

The circumstantial evidence is wayy too strong for even reasonable doubt! The were found in the bay, he was fishing in the bay, researched currents of the bay, bought a boat, made concrete blocks(!), got a temporary fishing license, and whoa! The bodies were found in the bay- no way! He had motive, showed deception and was void of emotion. HE. DID. IT. And belongs exactly where he is. Period.

To my mind, the evidence that most strongly points to guilt, is the evidence that he made the extra concrete anchors, which were missing. The fact she was found in the bay, where he had been fishing, missing her arms, legs and head, which appeared to have been detached due to the working of the currant on her decomposing, chained down body, makes those missing extra anchors very significant indeed. His defenders claim the kidnapper/s through her into the bay to frame Scott. But I had not heard any explanation for the state of her body and the missing anchors. Other related facts in evidence strengthen the case against him. But I think that set of facts alone, prove beyond reasonable doubt, that he is guilty as charged. Personally, I think it was Conner that he didn't want in the world. Had Lacy not been expecting, I expect he would have simply carried on his affair, and possibly divorced Lacy. But he didn't want 20 years of child support hanging over him. He is a psychopath, IMO, with no problem murdering inconvenient people.

Dr Todd’s burns always go HARD

All the witnesses that claimed to have seen Laci walking her dog would not have held up in court, which is why the high powered defense team ultimately didn't call them to testify. The witnesses gave their accounts AFTER a description of Laci was widely circulated in efforts to find her; reportedly at least 2 other pregnant women were known to walk their dogs in the vicinity; and the clothes that Laci was reported to be wearing did not match what she was wearing when her remains were recovered.

Scott's statement says "I did not kill my family." Even in his statement, he can't repeat their names.

The cement anchors he supposedly made because he kept messing up. 5 of them if i remember correctly. Poor laceys body was just her torso. With plant life growing inside her. Its not hard to put together he used those anchors on her limbs and head to hold her down and that her body wore down and eventually showed up. Her body protected her baby even in their deaths :(

He’s a compulsive, liar, no one can believe anything he says. He murdered his wife and unborn son. I hope he never, gets out & rots in prison!

And why would a burglar take her body! Give me a break! Scott is guilty as hell and belongs where he is!

Whatever "Innocence Project" is contemplating his innocence, THEY ARE WRONG. GUILTY AS CHARGED beyond a reasonable doubt. No "innocent" man stonewalls the police and refuses to help in any way with helping to find your missing wife?!?! He's where he belongs.

Trying to go to Mexico in disguise with a bag of cash is a sure sign of innocence.

The wife wasn't the inconvenience with infidelity, it was the baby that moved things along. In this case, the simplest answer, I believe is the correct answer.

I'm just speculating too. He's guilty as hell.

He is 100% guilty. No one could ever change my mind. The sheer amount of evidence against him is conclusive, IMO.

How can a man be smart enough to leave so little physical evidence but so much so much circumstantial evidence?

Guilty1. The porn channel. 2 sold Laci’s car. 3. Affairs. 4.Lied about his boat/golfing. 5. Boating exactly where bodies were found. 6. The lies. The lies the lies. Keep him locked up. The robbery was not on the day Laci went missing.

Burglars don't remove a victim they killed to a hidden location, nor do murderers for hire posing as burglars. Lacy's body was missing head, arms, and most of the legs, which suggests weighting down at the ankles and wrists, and in combination with her body not being found for almost 4 months reasonably concludes that she was at the bottom of the bay during that time. Burglars simply do not plan to anchor down a body in the bay. Whoever tried to hide Lacy's body at the bottom of the bay did so because they had a very, very vested interest in it not ever being found. Add in the fact that Peterson made a concrete "boat anchor", with evidence pointing to an additional four "anchors" and it all begins to shape a body of evidence that is internally consistent and removes reasonable doubt.

Peterson is guilty as sin, he went fishing and a month later they found her torso near where he went fishing. He also ran and changed his appearence, he actually deserves the unalive penalty.

What are the odds that someone else abducted, killed her and got a boat to dump her body in the same place he was fishing?

Stiff questions that were too hard for Scott to answer Classic Dr Grande 👏👏👏

The LA innocence project is wasting money, time and resources they could use on a truly innocent person. Laci's boy was due a month after mine. I look at my son rn and think of how Connor and Laci were so cruelly taken out of this world by someone that was supposed to love and protect them, and Connor never got the chance at life my son has.

And what really stinks is, "Laci, can I walk the dog and help you out today? Do you need me to get anything? If not, I'm going to go fishing, because you're due any day."