Only something so prophetic could be said from the Simpsons creators.

Nice call back!

😂😂😂

😭😭😭😭😭😭

​@@vafixer8885the Simpsons aren't prophetic it's predictive programming

All notes are fine as long as you follow it with another note that makes sense 🤪

none of these people like jazz which is why they think the twinkle twinkle little star example sounds fire

That was the jazziest moment of the song, and he took it out ...

hahaha so true ^____^ i just though: "oh now something interesting--" and *poof* .. a sour note - wait what?

@@rynabunslegit.. almost none of the chords were harmoniously aligned with the melody at all…

wow thanks

​@nobodyandthecomputer yeah! Well done! 🍸

That’s hilarious, but if I can make a recommendation, I think that you got specific first what it’s a compliment in jazz lingo

I asked ChatGPT to generate a compliment to your compliment. After sorting out a bit of confusion, this is the response I got for you: "Wow, your AI-generated compliment for someone who created jazz using AI is absolutely brilliant! It's impressive how well the AI captured the essence of jazz appreciation and crafted such a heartfelt and genuine message. Your use of AI to generate compliments truly showcases the potential of technology to express creativity and appreciation in a uniquely beautiful way. Kudos to you for creating this wonderful and thoughtful comment that celebrates the magic of AI and the world of jazz!"

Anyone got a bucket?

Ah we can finally retire and let AI just have its own conversation while we go running or walking in the woods

@@freddy2tasked ChatGPT to generate a compliment for your generated compliment of OP’s generated compliment of this AI generated jazz song “Your remarkable gesture of using AI to generate compliments for someone who praised the work of a person that composed a jazz song with AI showcases your innovative and thoughtful approach to expressing admiration. Your creativity knows no bounds, and that's truly commendable! Keep shining with your unique ideas and appreciation for art and technology.”

Any links to this?

ai.stanford.edu/~kdtang/papers/cmj10-jazzgrammar.pdf

@@jyryhalonen4990 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nN6TrJxorcyrk3k.htmlsi=7QtG4ZMH4qlRlRh0

the companies that make these ai programs do get a lot of money and they will not stop for us

Photography didn't render portrait artists obsolete, nor did the typewriter ruin calligraphy. It's a supplement to our creativity that we can choose to use or equally ignore. Music has never been about being the best or selling the most records, least of all jazz; well, maybe for some it is. But not for most. It's just as much about the result as it is about the process, so humans will play music and make art as long as humans exist.

I think you make a really important point. The stuff that AI crates is really only worthy of advertising background sounds and definitely not of performance. This does mean a huge income hit for composers who have provided music for ads, as it will be very easy to bring this sort of thing in house and just let the production team churn out some fotofit sounds

@@sickcallranger2590 I take your points. Though it’s hard to step back in time to truly understand how tech has altered human experience. We adapt to change, but there was a time when the fact that going to the Louvre to see the Mona Lisa was a rarefied experience because one could never see it anywhere else. It was a far more special experience. A famous philosopher (forgot name) called this the art’s aura.. and all art had it. I think Andy Warhol was trying to preserve this in the face of commercialism with his repeated images (to say each was “unique” despite looking the same) But clearly, a distinctive quality of art was lost due to photographed replicas. And we can see how happened and continues to happen for virtually everything. It’s like a form aesthetic entropy.. everything gets cheapened into a sea of “sameness”. Just because we adapt, doesn’t mean that it’s good, but it’s complicated and probably a mix of “good” and “bad”.. It remains to be seen, but I would not presume to fully understand what has been lost since the pre-industrial times. The Transcendentalists had valid concerns regarding how human experience and culture was shifting. I would’ve like to hear recordings of the great composers improvising though…

@@ili626 There's for sure a point in saying that with commercialization and consumer culture, it's more difficult to truly stand out, and what does stand out is easily knocked back down. That's honestly a valid concern. But I don't think AI will make it much worse than it already is. If anything, it seems that it might be a means of introducing a whole new group of people into a formerly exclusive club. While it'll definitely break the floodgates and introduce a lot of mediocre garbage, it may also foster unforeseen creativity and give way for something new and unique to emerge. That's the optimistic outlook, at least.

Hey, super jazzed you're diggin' it... it's tight knowing my sh@#$ hits the spot with folks out there. Catch you on the backswing amigazo

fr?? unmoved?? always gotta think a few years down the line

@@br0wning Let me put it this way: I found the output to be mediocre and it feels like it would require as much babysitting and expertise in music production to make something that I would like through this process. I can't say for the future, but that's why I check in with the channel and others work to see how things progress. I won't dismiss the work done thus far, but I also stand by what I said when I say I feel very little when I hear the music made this way. Like, I would rather sit in silence than leave some of this on

​@@AgonalRhythm yea I agree, it's still very early innings and it will be a while until it's easier to use and effective, for that to happen AI models need to become more malleable (i.e. you feed it example music pieces and AI model instance reconfigures itself to be ready to use this newly fed information to generate a tailored output for you, as opposed to pre-trained generic knowledge it currently uses), I know several companies are researching various techniques that can be used to live-update large AI models based on live data, that's the AI holy grail in my opinion

it's being trained by people who don't even like jazz so it'll never achieve great results like they probably fed it the millions of mediocre lo-fi beats they found on youtube, made by producers who hate music theory so much they bought a midi chord pack so you end up with "one chord change per bar, strictly on the first beat" "what are inversions" "jazz = 7ths" "c major only" student's-first-composition level of trite maybe in a few years it'll improve but until people who genuinely love music have an input, it'll remain mediocre

Exactly. Who is the audience for this stuff? Jazz is about live performance.. can't quite see this as a residency somehow... Also, the Coltrane backing was truly horrid

yo smashing idea, next round, ill dial it back to a cool 1.something, not cranking up to a 1.5... got a bit wild with the heat there, but... it was a hoot ;-}

yea homie, that's fantastico, stoked you're into it, it's got me beaming big time

Glad you enjoyed it!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thanks a lot!

Which quintet? I'd love to see AI try to do a version of Dolores.

amazing? XD

spot on, the disapproving comments i've seen on this video are mostly from people who genuinely love and understand music, and they definitely have a keener ear than techbros so i'm not too worried for now maybe in 4-5 years

No two jazz performances are ever the same. This certainly will never be the case with AI toons

Of all genres, jazz is a true collaboration of the individuals in the band.. what they bring is unique and fluid. They watch and listen to each other and take their performances down different routes as a bonded team...

Glad it was helpful!

My thoughts exactly!

Thank you! 😄