Please brother give me greyhound movie in Hindi please please ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Yes Mee too pleas

The germans like to take the shrimp fishing business... And they are not the funniest.

Or Joe's floating bagage got an upgrade after jumping into that volcano!

So: eat shrimps and run.

Ha ha ha ha yesss Benjamin!! Best comment

You win the internet with this comment!

As an older submariner.. SS-337 and SS-581 I was a sonar tech... The odds of a surface ship sinking a submerged submarine are actually astronomical. Just sayin'... Been there...

So you're an easily manipulated puppet for your terrorist government 🤔

i love this film and this man and he is so successful.he is real ancient greek.

@@russellmccann9027 They sank a lot of U-boats in the Second World War, especially after March 1943.

My Father was a machinist mate aboard an Ammunition ship in the Pacific during the Second World War. The thought of Japanese subs lurking in the sea below was the toughest part he said. The Kamikaze they could at least see and his ship earned 3 Battle Stars. He served from 1942-1945.

Such a great movie. U saved me from mentioning it

@@chrisanderson6837 one of my all time favorites...." wtf, movie was 5 hrs?! I did not notice that!"

The 5hr version would have to be the TV series, the films were shorter

@B Fortin Thank you for that feedback, haven't heard/read it ... But it does sound like U-boat veterans, doesn't it :)

Jürgen Prochnow - great performance.

Das Boot is awesome! Spellbinding tension.

Seen a movie with Puss in Das Boots. Any relation?

Indeed! Run Silent, Run Deep (movies based on Adm. Edward L. Beach, a WWII submariner), also excellent. One of my favorites is Hunt for Red October. The behavior and dialog of the US sub's personnel was also virtually spot on right down to the Capt. exclaiming "Make a hole!" when descending a ladder (stairs to all you civilians).

It is excellent, unlike the ludicrous new series of the same name.

Absolute 102...just wish they had a full blown, hog out Flak battle...with a 3.7 & the 2 twin 20's. Saw it when it premiered on a swelteringly hot day...and the flipping air conditioning went down in the cinema. We were literally sweating just as much as the boat's crew....and right when they surfaced and opened the coning tower hatch....the A/C came back on.💨

@Roy Taylor I've been told the same, been meaning to get round to it

@Roy Taylor Definitely, The Cruel Sea is a fantastic film.

My Grandfather was a Liberty Ship (Chatham) Captain and he was torpedoed in August of 1942 in the Belle Isle Straight. All but 14 hands survived (548 Survivors), including my Grandfather. The sub (U-517) was later sunk.

Dont forget about Algorithm, because that bloody subject always give me a g0d@mn€d headache

My sentiments exactly.

Have you ever played any submarine sim from WW2? How many times there I prayed for the right triangle ... that is piece of cake. My guess they had tables and nomograms to help them. And lot of training so it became their second nature. Still - it had to be tough

Not really that complex. Most of the maths is done by the TDC. You need to identify the ship to find its length, then count the seconds it takes from bow to stern, divide the length by the seconds gives you m/s, times it by 2 to get knots. Distance was calculated in different ways but essentially involved the mast height of the ship, some did it nearly automatically while some used a more manual chart comparing mast height to centiradians in the scope. Then angle to bow is calculate either by eye or by plotting the ships heading and position compared to your position.

LOL Good One!

Anyway he loves little girls

Woke people cant cope with the truth.

Great actors can give great performances with dialogue and editing, comedians are on another level with quick responses. Few can do both.

as a white man Hanks wont be invited to any more Oscars

Well he is the man that killed Tiger tank from the front with his 1911 pistol - thus no surprise

The Japanese Imperial Navy couldn't believe their eyes ! Having successfully lured admiral Halsey into pursuing IJN plane-less carriers, the Japanese battleships thought they had The Leyte bridgehead set for slaughter (making up for their missed opportunity at Guadalcanal after their Savo victory) But those insolent little tin cans played the spoilsports with their tiny torpedoes and puny popguns ! In 1944, the IJN carriers were depleted of planes and even more of pilots, and had begun to resort to kamikazes. But they still had their battleships & they turned them into their mastercards above the carriers. But Halsey was obsessed with the carriers (although a US sub had crippled 2 IJN carriers before the battle) and underestimated the IJN battleships. The IJN came to a hairbreadth of victory were it not for those tin cans and their escort carriers.

@@Charlesputnam-bn9zy, Halsey was just another MacArthur, a glory seeking brass ass. In the Vietnam conflict they had one called Westmoreland, another glory seeking brass ass. Every war or conflict has at least one.

Charles putnam1982 Admiral Kurita made the mistake of giving the “General Attack” order after mistaking Taffy 3 for Halsey’s 3rd Fleet carrier group. Poor communication and recon also resulted in believing Ozawa’s decoy fleet didn’t lure Halsey away. A lot of important battles could’ve been very different if the Japanese Admirals had made a few decisions. -Battle off Samar, Admiral Takeo Kurita could’ve annihilated Taffy 3 if he had pressed the attack and kept his ships in formation. -Battle of Midway, Vice Admiral Chuichi Nagumo should’ve prioritized the American carriers first. His indecision costed him. -Battle of Savo Island, Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa should’ve proceeded to bombard the Marines and their supplies on Guadalcanal. He also became famous for retreating when he had the chance to strike a decisive blow. Even Yamamoto made mistakes. He should’ve had a more carrier-minded Admiral in charge of the Carriers at Midway like Jisaburo Ozawa instead of Nagumo. Also the Aleutian Invasion was completely useless. Having the Ryujo, Jun’yo, with the Hosho and Zuiho carrying only Fighters to protect the Fleet Carriers of the 1st Carrier Division could’ve really helped in their defense. He trusted Nagumo too much. Probably should’ve listened to Rear Admiral Tamon Yamaguchi more. Just having Kurita’s Cruiser Division and Vice Admiral Shiro Takasu’s 2nd Battleship Division from the Aleutian Fleet move ahead of the main fleet to bombard Midway would’ve drawn out Nimitz’s carriers easier. While Nimitz sends his bombers to deal with the bombardment fleet, Nagumo’s bombers are at the ready to attack his carriers once spotted. Should’ve, could’ve, would’ve, didn’t. One has to wonder what would’ve happened if the Japanese leadership hadn’t fallen into the control of the Army.

Actually it was three destroyers and one destroyer escort: USS Johnston, USS Samuel B. Roberts (the DE), USS Hoel and USS Heermann.

Damn good point and PLEASE without Tom Hanks and Apple involved! 👍

"right standard rudder aye"

If in doubt do it and then ask

Any salty crewman would have anticipated the Captain's orders beforehand and done it without hesitation . They've done this drill dozens of times under their last Skipper . Experienced crews know what to to do . Orders from the CO do nothing but allow them to act upon their training .

Its a movie. It adds drama.

@@willthorson4543 You nailed it.

Good.

NICK THORP the kind of guy who paints his room black and white.

Yeah... so? The proper place for a nazi.. dead.

Stillnapie Germans.

@@PowerandLuxury No... Nazi's...

As the terms ASDIC and SONAR are/were the same thing at the time [ - ASDIC, British, SONAR, American] what are you going on about? Incidentally I find the gentleman in question was the closest to doing anything 'brilliant' producing a submarine from what looks like an echo sounder only (Mind it is possible if done at the right angle etc. but only just

@@mikewalrus4763 I'm highlighting one of the differences in procedure between the Royal Navy and the US Navy during the Second World War. It's interesting to know. That's what learning is all about.

@Nick Belane Remembering that Radar was in it's infancy during the war years - at the start very few ships actually had a workable set let alone one that could tell the difference between air or surface contacts (as for the weather conditions at the time you'd be lucky to see anything) and that ran towards the 60's / 70's stuff as well! There are and were of course always those operators (in all Navies) whose share of "Luck" and expertise seemed to be greater than others. but even they were at times not getting much. One of the initial problems was the wave length of the bursts of power without getting too complicated with air radar mostly being in the metric size and the surface being 3 to 10 centimetric - The shorter wave length had the higher deffinition but also the shorter range plus of course the sets at the time were ALL valve sets - transistors etc just hadn't been invented! So the short answer to your question is probably NO! But possible, maybe, if you are in Holywood and trying to make a film.

He is another blind liberal

Dear Mr. Ford, Thank you for keeping the Germans away. Thank you for your bravery. I do not like Tom Hanks. I am conflicted about watching his movie. He seems on the one hand to respect the soldiers who fought for America but eschews America. America, as all countries is a work in progress. I sincerely wish Mr Hanks would use language that reflects the same. Sincerely, Brent O’Conner

It was crap . None of it actually happened. It's all fake move crap .

@@benjimenfranklin7650 What the Battle of the Atlantic never happened? Ok buddy, in a technical sense this particular engagement might not have happened, but the point, like Das Boot, is to try and faithfully reproduce what combat in that particular theatre and time period looked like. The film Master and Commander also takes plenty of liberties when it comes to the location and timeline of the events its based on but no one argues that its depiction of naval warfare of the time isn't one of the best ever put to film.

@@asneakychicken322 Your an idiot there is no ship called Grayhound in 1942 ! It's all fake get over it 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

As an amateur historian, I really this movie. That surface engagement wasn’t too historically accurate but I like to let it slide.

I’m not a historian, however I feel it was a bit of a stretch for u boat captains to mock warships over a radio, and jeopardize their location. Also, u boats targeting a warship just seemed wasteful. Their torpedos are limited, and worth way more in attacking big cargo ships, than agile warships with equipment. Overall, I think the writing besides that was great, especially the details during the engagements.

Yeah, amazing efforts www.renegadetribune.com/tom-hanks-jokes-about-exploiting-his-6-year-old-daughter-in-sexy-baby-competitions/

I don't think that the U-boats were very luxurious in comfort either

@@danrutherford7802 probably similar

If I recall correctly the US Subs had more room than the german U-boats so even tighter quarters

I took a tour of the one in Mobile....I was amazed at how much exposed plumbing, valves, conduit were ALL over the sub. With everything on and running and buzzing ....noise....heat.... NOT where I would want to fight a battle.

jesus you bar is low. Its alright for entertainment on a week day, but far from a classic.

The Nazi German U Boat are really strucking fear into the allied's convoys and flotillas heart at the Atlantic

Hahahahahahahaha

More like hunting a bear with a grenade launcher in the fog.

It's like war at sea. It's the way it was.

Uboats need to resurface for air. As well as recharging their battery`s by switching to diesel engines. Even using a snorkel could expose them. It's not like a nuclear sub these days that can run forever underwater.

@@frosty2975 Didn't early U-boats (or U-boats in general) have to resurface to fire as well?

@@guildedcharr7459 If you mean the main cannon then yes. But you need a TDC and a periscope to measure the speed and distance of your enemy ships. Once you measured it you put it into the TDC and then you fire the torpedo`s. This is done at a periscope depth. And thus you can shoot torpedo`s underwater towards the enemy. But you need to make sure that your torpedo isn't too deep in the water or it might go under the boot instead of hitting it.

@@frosty2975 Cool, I learned a new thing today.

@@frosty2975 early in the war U boats attacking at night often launched their torpedoes while surfaced. The reason for this was that their surfaced speed was higher (making them able to carry out more attacks without losing the convoy) and the Allied sonar couldn't see surfaced vessels. A surfaced U boat has a very small visual signature so it was hard for lookouts to see them in the dark, making such attacks quite stealthy. This tactic stopped after the Allies developed radar sets small enough to fit aboard destroyers and corvettes, as radar could see surfaced subs easily regardless of the conditions.

Even though I liked it and was well done , it just fell short of being a deeper story due to it going straight to streaming . Like Band Of Brothers . Needed some more indepth back story perhaps . Still gave 8.5/10 . My Father in Law was doing this during the Atlantic Convoys by the way on HMS Amelia as an Electrician and later a leading TorpedoMan ( some smaller frigates had them )

frank patton what is that ?

@frank patton - He only would have a cameo in a movie like that..

@@nicoscami3982 so Kevin spacey is who you mean

@@nicoscami3982 08

HAHAHAHAHA

@Mr and Mrs. Smith My comment was intented for anyone who wanted to know more about the U-boat war. I have no connection with the Royal Navy, so I have nothing to brag about.

The movie has a submarine captain taunting the American escorts on radio to make clear who the baddies are... So much tryhard revisionism... and then these ridiculous steampunk paintjobs on the subs which have nothing to do with the originals... subs surfacing to fight destroyers in close combat... so much Hollywood bullshit.

@@darkawakening01 UBoats did have patterns painted on them. Technically they weren't supposed to but it helped morale so the fleet ignored it. An example is U-552 with a pair of large devils on the conning tower. U25 had a huge shark jaw painted on. The sub fight on the surface was explained in the movie, "Dicky forced him up" after the depth charges and the lookout called out "She's damaged sir, can't submerge".

@@josephramponi4431 Please compare the originally used patterns to the over-the-top ones in the movie. The batches displayed are just silly and way oversized.

@@darkawakening01 That is true, they do stand out more than most real-life counterparts, but it is intentional and necessary for film which is a visual medium. Subs all look the same, they are a grey metal tube, people see it on the screen and you can't tell if it is showing you the same sub, a different sub or maybe there are thirteen subs. Patterns allow a person to quickly recognize when they are looking at different subs and when they are looking at the same sub. Oversizing the pattern made it still recognizable in a wideshot like at 0:18, I can see it is not the lead sub, at the end of this clip like 4:10 I can see that's the lead sub there. This happened in the movie Flyboys as well. I saw a behind the scenes clip where the director was talking about the German triplanes being an anachronism. In test audiences, fights between multiple biplanes were confusing because you couldn't tell the difference while they were maneuvering or when the camera cut over. They ended up making all the German planes triplanes so people could see which plane was on whose side.

@@darkawakening01 The U-Boats were actually known to contact enemy vessels and taunt them. The idea of an enemy being able to drop in and out of sight is scary already but the idea of that enemy calling you up over the loud speaker and breaking your moral. Brilliant tactic

WAS... He's shit now.

U-boat is short for Unterseeboot which means submarine. It’s like saying “Panzer tank” or “Flugzeug plane”.

@@samanli-tw3id yah that's what hes getting at. It is redundant to say both UBoat and SubMarine

At least they didn't call anything German in WW2 as Nazi.

The Reds tried to torpedo you?

being on a ASW carrier off vietnam, there were plenty of noisy chinese sub's, but we had attack sub's assign to carrier groups. only sure way to stop a enemy sub... never heard about a attack on a navy ship in vietnam war.

@@willwindau2278 Yeah, to the best of my knowledge, this incident did not get out in public. And I've not talked about it much. Since no one got hurt & no ships damaged, I guess it was filed away as one of a number of incidents that summer. However, as a fellow NAVY shipmate, you deserve some answers. My ship was a Forrestal-class attack carrier operating in the Black Sea in August 1968. Unknown to us, the single Greek destroyer didn't show up that was scheduled to join our two US & two UK destroyers in our screen. However, we thought that the ship that DID show up and took that slot was the Greek ship. We should have been suspicious. I was suspicious, as not only did the 'Greek' escort show up on time and signaled, responded, & maneuvered flawlessly, (Unlike the typical Greek ship), it didn't look like any destroyer I knew of. I raised the issue of this larger, missile-mounted wooden-decked new ship with my superiors, to no avail. But we were all shocked, when on the day that we got radio distress calls from Prague to come to their assistance as the Soviet Warsaw Pact forces & tanks invaded, that odd 'Greek' ship left its station in the screen and failed to respond to our signals as it re-positioned it self on the horizon. I remember watching it with binoculars from the bridge (I was acting JOD) as it lowered the Greek flag and hoisted the Soviet Navy ensign. So, we'd been had! Later that day came the torpedo attack from the starboard beam. It was a close thing. The UK destroyers were especially active in hounding the sub away. There was no debriefing of me after the incident that I recall. No doubt, there was more to it as we seemed to just move on once the sub was driven out. But I never knew any more of it and have not had reason to mention it since. Of course, there's always the possibility that I misunderstood the incident.

@@DawnOfTheDead991 most probably a soviet sub but chinese crew

@@nonsibi1087 Im Greek, i've never heard of Greek Destoyers participating in the Vietnam War.

The merchant ships and troop transports were bigger and slower, and less likely to be able to maneuver out of harm's way. The escort destroyers, on the other hand, were capable fighting ships; take out one of the escorts, and the others will find the offending U-boat come hell or high water, and sink it. Choosing to sink targets of opportunity rather than taking the enemy head-on was conducive to long life for a U-boat captain and crew. The taunting over the radio channels was a bit much, but overall this particular wolfpack had everything correct until the last couple of days.

They hunted in wolfpacks... and they would 1st set up the Destroyers for the kills ! taking out of the escort screens meant that the Uboats would have all the time needed to sink the entire convoys while they were in the kill zone without any aircover depth charge for 5 days !

Na they would never make it. To unrealistic plot ;)

@@glenchapman3899 But they could make one about his nephew who is stationed at pearl harbor who loses his best friend in Britain then comes back only after he has fallen in love with the other guys girlfriend, then they get bombed at Pearl, so then they go on the doolittle raid and the guy in love with the other guys girlfriend gets shot and the other guy comes home to the girl and raises dead friends baby with the girl they both loved.......

@@bad74maverick1 lol

Tom Hanks got his guys in the crow's nest keeping a lookout for a volley ball floating in the ocean. _"Wiiiiilsooooon!!! I'm soooorry!!!"_

@@bad74maverick1 he was joking because they made saving private ryan

You can say that again ...

In France, and the Atlantic. A movie of Tom Hanks beating the Japanese is next.

Also the Cold War (Gump and Bridge of Spies)

stupid statement..... these types of heroes need to be remembered.... maybe we can avoid having to fight the same fight again

@@grandpoobahful the movie was plain farcical, and portrays a first time convoy escort Commander sinking a record amount of submarines basically singehandedly. Hollywood at it again. As such its a valid statement. Perhaps they should make a movie about a real hero of WW2 sub hunting, who wrote the book on tactics- Captain Frederick John "Johnnie" Walker, Royal Navy.

My late father was a naval gunner on, amongst others, Convoy PQ17, the 'Convoy to Hell", during which he was twice torpedoed. Fortunately he survived, but often said that the lucky ones were the lads who DIDN'T come back; they didn't have to live the consequences for the rest of their lives. RIP, all the men who served, on both sides.

be...cause... Saving Private Ryan...doesn't exist? Or wasn't good enough?

Movie was garbage. The point of a uboat is to stay down and fire from as far away as they can. This movie was for people who know nothing about sea warfare. A Uboat trying to ram a destroyer

Heureusement que les convois étaient escortés dommage que les alliés n aient pas commencé plus tôt ça aurait éviter le naufrage de tous ces malheureux marins et la perte au niveau ravitaillement et tonnage des bâtiments Des hommes courageux bravant les pires éléments surtout les u boats

@123 xyz Maybe he can play a communist political commissar in the red army

123 xyz He's an actor. Who fucking cares about his politics.

AUDIE MURPHY WON THE SECOND WORLD WAR. JOHN WAYNE AND THE REST ACTED IN IT.

I believe that Errol Flynn liberated Burma single-handedly.

They sold the rights to Apple.

Anything with a good story wants Tom Hank's as its staring actor.

@@maximiliand2544 yes but you can have too much of a good thing.

@@martincornish3179 agreed

He likes doing WW2 stuff. He did saving private ryan and this plus being part of production/director of Band of brothers and The pacific with HBO

Damn, he's been the captain of every uniform forces.

I dare say many if not most families, including my own, have poor genealogy records, or could just care less, i.e. give a damn. Not until I was 30, doing my own family tree research, did I learn my maternal 4th Great-grandfather & his brother both served in Co. "G", US 35th Kentucky Infantry (Mounted) during the Civil War. I never heard either my Mom or her father mention it, & suspect neither may have known.

@@gregdzialo9998 yeah I don't know why that is. I lived in Eastern Europe for ten years and I liked to visit cathedrals, and they always had a few graves under a stone slab. The cathedral in my town, Kolín Czech Republic had one from the 1300s, a sandstone wall with a knight holding a sword, and I thought, I'm sure his ancestors live in this town, and they might not even know.

@@gregdzialo9998 no kidding. I know on my father's side I know he's got a bunch of ancestors who served with Virginia, but he doesn't know exactly which company. Far out, Kentucky, hard men.

@@freddymarcel-marcum6831 Kentucky was carved from territory claimed by Virginia statehood...many men, especially Revolutionary War & War of 1812 veterans, were awarded land grants from the state to be pioneer settlers, in lieu of a monetary pension.

@@gregdzialo9998 my mother, both of my uncle's and my sister and maternal grandfather were born in Ashland, and I'm fleeing California for Ashland in about two and a half weeks 😆 Fuck this place 😆

In Which We Serve is another great film.

Snorkers!

The Enemy Below was another great movie!

@@COIcultist Snorkers Good oh !

Das Boot was the best. This movie was garbage. The point of a uboat is to stay down and fire from as far away as they can. This movie was for people who know nothing about sea warfare. A Uboat trying to ram a destroyer

Well when you consider that the Germans built over 1,100 uboats throughout the war, I would say the target was well met. Dunno where you got your sources from lol.

@@corporalsilver6981 Less than 50 operational U-Boats were available to Donitz when itchy, trigger-finger, Adolph started WW2 in September of 1939. Historical fact.

@@marvinthiessen3454 Actually they had 65 U-Boats available at the start of the war. But I want to point out that having 500 uboats active at once would quite litteraly tank the German economy. You can't run so many vessels without a budget. So it makes sense.

783 Uboats were sunk during the Battle of the Atlantic. Dunno were 50 came from.

@@corporalsilver6981 Doenitz really needed 300 at war's outset while Allied escorts and technology were weak. Instead he had about 25. By the time he had 300, it was too late, given Allied resources and technology.

Holy Shit ! Another Sellers Feller ! I walked the brow to the USS Sellers DDG 11 in the Autumn of 1985 as an OSSA. NAVSTA Charleston S.C. I EAOSed in December 1988 as an OS2 . OI01 was my Division . I reenlisted about six months later , got shore duty as a Navy MP in Yokosuka Japan before going back to sea on USS Antietam CG 54 out of Long Beach CA. Did a WESTPAC and a Persian Gulf deployment on Antietam. Nice to see another tin can veteran in this chat .

You also had better sonar and radar than a WWII Fletcher had during the war plus 'over the side' homing torpedoes. Even so, diesel-electric submarines remain a serious threat … the newer the boat, the greater the threat. I spent a little over 3 years in a Spruance class DD, Soviet nuc subs were much easier to detect and track than a diesel-electric.

While landing on the Hudson.

@MrPeterharold Undoubtedly so.

U-Boot= Unterseeboot U-boat is an anglicised version of the German word U-Boot

I agree. Unless there is another kind of U-Boat that isn't a submarine? (Rhetorical question)

das boot

@@skelejp9982 no! Unterwasser Boot = U-Boot

Like Naan bread and Chai tea?

Nope

Movie HD on a Sony android tv👍

When a KZfaq commenter doesnt know what a soundtrack is.

@@xerex21212 wars do not have sound tracks only screams

@@storm6_6trooper31 I was watching a movie. What war were you fighting ?

@@xerex21212 lmmfao 💀 I didn't say I was

@@storm6_6trooper31 Oh so you were watching a movie too ? With a soundtrack ?

This movie was garbage. The point of a uboat is to stay down and fire from as far away as they can. This movie was for people who know nothing about sea warfare. A Uboat trying to ram a destroyer and surface to have a small arms firefight. Watch Das Boot

Where did you watched

@@patricioaguayo9088 I watched it on popcorntime

@@rhreznor If you watched the movie you would know: 1. The U boats surfaces for 2 reasons, gain speed to catch up with the convoy and to exchange fresh air. 2. The movie never once depict a ramming action by any of the U boats. It however depicts a U boat hugging another destroyer which was a common tactic at the time as destroyer BOFORS and main guns could not depress down enough to get a clean shot off. 3. German U boats who are forced to surface often use their deck gun and other mounted weaponry. Although Germans aren't as fanatic as shown in the movie and will often surrender than go down in a blaze of glory. The movie depicts U boats surfacing because of damage caused by concentrated fire. 4. German U boat wolf pack tactics shown in the movie is accurate enough. Wolf packs will often attack from opposite directions to thin out the escorts. Don't hate the movie blindly. Watch it before making yourself look like an ass on KZfaq.