I just want to reiterate THIS IS A VIDEO GAME, it does not replicate all the intricacies found in a real world battle, it does not replicate the weapons capabilities in real life, and therefor it does not have any bearing on real life. I think some people forget that.
@superbudeguАй бұрын
Not only is this a game, this is DCS, the worst game to simulate a naval battle in. That's why I watch cap's videos with a huge bag of salt lol. His videos are fun, but in no way it simulates or represents what would have happened if the USN and PLAN clashed in the sea.
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqАй бұрын
@@superbudegu if fictional doesn't matter then the quote "pens are mightier than swords" will not able to exist . constantly bombarment unfamiliar , naive viewer with misinformation , lies , fictional , bias confict/war scenario long enough then people will believe everything you said are truth . that is "how to win information/propagranda warfare 101" . why do you think there are so many channel with 500k , 1m+ sub praise US/NATO ability will crush china/russia everytime working 24/7 exist ? the inforgraphic show , the military show , politico , Sandboxx , task and purpose .v.v.v can't even remember how many of them there
@kimjonglongdong3158Ай бұрын
@@superbudegu can I ask why DCS is the WORST game to simulate a naval battle in? Is it highly inaccurate compared to other games?
@superbudeguАй бұрын
@@kimjonglongdong3158 DCS is not made for modern naval warfare simulation, only something like Command: Modern Operations can do something like this and even CMO is not realistic enough. the naval battles you see on this channel are not real and this is not how they would nplay out in real life. Most of the weapons used have their real capabilities classified, the ranges of the naval battles are not real, the missiles and AI are dumb af, there is no EW involved, etc. Naval warfare is very complex for a game like DCS to emulate properly, not even CMO is capable of that.
@kimjonglongdong3158Ай бұрын
@@superbudegu Ah so its more that DCS is better suited to older tech battles, plus lack of info on modern systems? The battles are still pretty fun though
@JSm-g8yАй бұрын
It seems unfair to make the Chinese carry land attack missiles which they can't use in the battle while the other carrier groups carry exclusively anti-ship and anti-air weapons.
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqАй бұрын
he openly said all the battle was set up to cripped red team one way or another > make sure blue alway win . because he get more money donate every time blue team win
@lovepapa9559Ай бұрын
I feel like someone want to cheating to win for he has still feel good. 😁@@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cq
@jimwsh127 күн бұрын
尽管如此,蓝方依然不开心😂
@user-ks5dp1ew6cКүн бұрын
the britz also had land atack missiles
@sweatybotfn9982Ай бұрын
Imagine demonetizing just for showing Afghanistan
@grimreapersАй бұрын
We must have said something that YT didn't like, but not sure what.
@gregbrown3764Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers "China too powerful so..."
@FoquroC31Ай бұрын
@@gregbrown3764 It wasnt this video which got demonitized
@babocheeАй бұрын
KZfaq/Google continually choose to work with the CCP defense companies over American companies, and you wonder why a video that ever shows criticism toward the Chinese is demonetized? Bro, there are intelligence groups made of tens of thousands of analysts telling KZfaq what to censor/demonetize/suppress/blacklist.
@laurentitolledo1838Ай бұрын
Secret service's stern warning to YT caused it?
@John333ScoutАй бұрын
Why is this a complaint? They only have 8 Type 055 and 25 Type 052. The US has 73 Arleigh Burks, and 13 Ticonderoga. IF people want to put all the freaking Chinese cruisers 055 in one carrier group then the US should be allowed 9 Ticonderoga's. Each hosting 75% of their Cruizer fleet in one carrier group which is stupid. Really the 2 055 and 4 052 vs 2 TC & 4 AB should really look like... The US having 12 Arleigh Burks and 3 Ticonderoga's and 2-3 Carriers vs 1 Chinese Carrier 2 055 and 4 052.
@BruhvernorАй бұрын
Not to mention the sub escorts. But chinas got a lot Of subs now too, and that puts a whole other crazy dynamic to the sim
@WindowsXP-SP3Ай бұрын
Is Ticoderoga really better than Arleigh Burks? I thought most of them will retire soon.
@johnsilver9338Ай бұрын
@@WindowsXP-SP3 Tico has more VLS. While Burke Flight III has better radars.
@Frost-01Ай бұрын
@@WindowsXP-SP3 its more or so their missile capacity that makes them relevant, they have around 122 VLS cells vs the Burke's 96 VLS cells. and Datalinking is a thing so even if the Tico's have older radars the Burkes can make up for that and guide the missiles the Tico fires along with the E-2 hawkeye towards the targets.
@ew264Ай бұрын
The 055 is a destroyer not a cruiser.
@SdoZachary128 күн бұрын
Why add the British aircraft carrier? It is a mobile museum.
@jakeslouw3416Ай бұрын
I like that you showed the 3 minute version. Gives us a proper frame of reference.
@eskildscott7841Ай бұрын
i noticed that the US didn´t fire any sm3 why is that? and would that have made a big enough difference?
@AJCiani-physicsАй бұрын
The SM-3 is an exo-atmospheric interceptor for medium and long-range ballistic missiles. It lofts a small kill vehicle into near-space along the trajectory of the BM, and then the kill vehicle jets itself into the sub-orbital BM. The kill vehicle on the SM-3 isn't even explosive, it is entirely kinetic. The YJ-21 and YJ-18 are based on short-range BM's that don't leave the atmosphere. The US Navy carries SM-3s in their VLS because these interceptors need to be used over the Pacific near the Russian/Chinese coasts, or over the Atlantic near the European coast. If used near the US coasts, the warheads would likely already be entering the atmosphere and could not be intercepted with an SM-3.
@zburnhamАй бұрын
In the GR Bingo game, "Cap apologizing for his voice" is the free square.
@corvanphoenix10 күн бұрын
I'm scared of these things too. Thanks for the sim Cap!
@aburetik4866Ай бұрын
In 2023 alone, China built 43.22 million tons of ships while America only 0.6 million. Just imagine if China puts that massive ship building capacity into military purpose. It can make American navy look like a small baby in no time.
@kirovfactoryАй бұрын
The problem is with the conversion rate (seen 30:1 from some study) and restricted supply of crucial parts. But I highly doubt the scenario as the building time of modern warships are that long and the supply chain so vulnerable. The side that is slightly disadvantaged in the first few days will have their shipbuilding asset wiped out. And to consider that the US has two ocean fronts and its operation base lined up all the way toward China's door step, basically it can afford to lose many battles but keep gaming while China is one defeat from game over.
@user-hb6pz8nx4cАй бұрын
The difference is quality vs quantity. Chinese boats are floating aluminum cans, US boats are heavily armored
@aburetik4866Ай бұрын
@@user-hb6pz8nx4c chinese type 055 is far more powerful than any American obsolete craps like Arleigh burke built with 1970s technology
@aburetik4866Ай бұрын
@@user-hb6pz8nx4c chinese type 055 is far more pwerful than American obsolete junks like Arleigh burke built with 1970s technology.
@aburetik4866Ай бұрын
@@user-hb6pz8nx4c chinese type 055 is far more advanced/powerful than American small floating coffins like Arleigh burke built with 1980s technology
@RobertRobert-cu7ptАй бұрын
US aircraft carriers can be hit by Houthi missiles, but in the game, they can successfully shoot down YJ-21
@jureeratpholseela7508Ай бұрын
Source ? BS
@jimwsh127 күн бұрын
蓝队必胜,不然这个频道就要被网暴了
@jureeratpholseela750827 күн бұрын
@@jimwsh1 Hi, well he is english so make sense , you could do your channel and make he red win ,,, Or just do not watch . End of the day just a game , fortunately
@Rheinmetall202526 күн бұрын
Except an American carrier ha never been hit with a Houthis missile…
@jureeratpholseela750825 күн бұрын
@@Rheinmetall2025 True let the troll fall for their on delusion . I like looking at those video from the houthis PR they are such nonsense , yet people like them the guy is a total caricature of Sash Baron Cohen ... so hilarious .
@willwozniak2826Ай бұрын
Cant people just watch and enjoy?....great work Cap...thanks for the Birthday present CAP..45 I turn today...👉🏻.
@BrrrrtttАй бұрын
Happy birthday 🎂🎂
@jorehirАй бұрын
Can't people add value to the discussion? jeeez...
@grimreapersАй бұрын
Happy Birthday!
@ivorhardenАй бұрын
Maybe the Taliban complained to YT, because they thought your Afghanistan video was bad for tourism.
@grimreapersАй бұрын
Fair comment.
@lukegraydon6266Ай бұрын
So they took ad money for the Afghan map video but then de-monetised it?? Cannot stand this platform anymore ripping off creators..
@grimreapersАй бұрын
Yup
@desmondsun704126 күн бұрын
This is a amazing. The UK has two crippled never-eady toys that they call carriers. Such a serious topic to kick off the joke.
@Rheinmetall202526 күн бұрын
Well not really, they are the most modern aircraft carriers with a lot of sailing hours already…
@mcmitonet803229 күн бұрын
they are only making 8 of them AT THE SAME TIME. But already 8 are in duty since 2017. and future plan is up to 24
@wyatthuseth1735Ай бұрын
CAP, can you please model the SEARAM for the arleigh burke flight III's. It is similar to the HQ-10 from the chinese. I know you have the RIM 116, but they seem under modeled compared to the HQ-10
@xpk0228Ай бұрын
yeah SeaRAM is better than CIWS in all sorts of testing. but in DCS it doesn't work for some reason
@cyronaderАй бұрын
@@xpk0228 Are you sure? Didn't CH get it working on the Constellation Class?
@keithwan4028Ай бұрын
You forget their jamming ability of the Type 055s
@Mobius118Ай бұрын
Your Afghan map video getting demonetized is completely ridiculous. Must have angered somebody with city pronunciations… somehow?
@david7384Ай бұрын
Biden team trying to forget about Afghanistan 😂😂😂
@Mobius118Ай бұрын
@@david7384 For real 😅😂
@NoTBeta-bo4ncАй бұрын
lol, love ur vids too
@Mobius118Ай бұрын
@@NoTBeta-bo4nc Great to see you lol
@chrisstopher2277Ай бұрын
This game is 16 years old? So a 2008 engine but with 2024 tech. I love when you redo old battles because of the history lessons. I enjoy these as well though.
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
DCS literally came out 16 years ago but it is continuously updated. Also remember it is a air combat simulator not a naval simulator
@user-wh9er8pe9nАй бұрын
The most powerful yj21, in your video, feels like a useless thing, obviously weakened.
@ObiWanShinobi917Ай бұрын
KZfaq keeps deleting my comments with suggestions so I guess I'll just give up and say that the U.S. Naval doctrine (centered around AEGIS) cannot be accurately modeled in DCS.
@Vengeance4308Ай бұрын
Same
@supersonic6222Ай бұрын
You should model the Zumwalt class destroyers. They would add a lot of power to the US Carrier strike group.
@ObviousTroll69-i6kАй бұрын
Allied carrier groups need to operate together to maximise mutual protection.
@nathanchristensen824Ай бұрын
Yay!! A GR vid! Not a bot, just love this series!
@Doodelz02Ай бұрын
Yup 100% with you. Cap's correct that mix of realism & entertainment is the way to go. Who would watch if there was zero drama and zero uncertainty from a continually one-sided fight? And you certainly wouldn't watch if the game crashed over and over from the US using multiple carrier groups! Simulations will improve over time, of course! That said, I personally get huge value from the occasional exploration of a reality-centric video like this one. Well done!
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqАй бұрын
@@Doodelz02 "Who would watch if there was zero drama and zero uncertainty from a continually one-sided fight?" are you blind or just pretent to not see nearly all of his battle video between blue vs red team alway end up with blue team won in a turkey shot 2+/1 k/d ratio with alot of love bias toward blue ? more aircraft , mass equip 5th gen , smaller rcs , human pilot , more missile cap/aircraft , US anti air missile god-like accuracy , full of non-existen future weapon ?
@Doodelz02Ай бұрын
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cq I'm sure that's well intended feedback. (I'm not, but trying to be polite). Feel free to invest the time and energy to make your own in an effort to support your family and entertain folks around the world. I'll happily watch ... one.
@haire618Ай бұрын
Because I know the Ford supercarrier class it has sm3 and sm6 launchers and out defensive system such as Harpoons also attack systems also
@twveach23 күн бұрын
Just curious, what kind of computer does it take to run a simulation like this?
@jovianr9498Ай бұрын
Spectacular video, good work Cap :)
@robertshields4250Ай бұрын
A rapid dragon or hypersonic revolver would be a nice addition to fleet Warfare videos!
@robertshields4250Ай бұрын
Nice fleet combat videos! Please add random submarine influence to make more realistic as subs might be deciding factor in many scenarios. Keep up good work.
@Al.CallerАй бұрын
Thank you Cap! Did you do this cos I asked nice?
@fubob184924 күн бұрын
The Chinese cannot defeat an army of soldiers with two mothers
@shukema3529 күн бұрын
you should do an air force one escort and see if it could defend it self
@WolvesValleyFarmАй бұрын
I don't know anything about DCS so i've no idea if it can even be done. But I would like to see a PvP battle with evenly matched fleets where each side has a player acting as the admiral. That would really give some insight into what a real battle would be like.
@Slikx666Ай бұрын
Given how long Cap has been doing this I'm surprised that any complains about something. I'd like to complain about a few things but the game has it rules and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Maybe if someone make DCS2.....
@MrWadeantАй бұрын
What do I do after you Vids? Go to make coffee and then sit down to work (I work on a UK University Student Management system all the way down here in NZ)
@TypicalBritishperson4972Ай бұрын
Could you do US vs Britain and France and maybe also Spanish and Italian harriers
@jorehirАй бұрын
It would be awesome, but he said he's waiting for people to create the models for those other navies. I think it will take a while... There are also tricky things to model for them, like the STRALES system used by Italy.
@hughmungus2760Ай бұрын
Also in the first test scenario were the YJ21s actually attempting terminal maneuvers? cause if they were that'd be a new feature CH snuck in.
@grimreapersАй бұрын
I don't think it's on purpose, it's changes to core game that make it behave differently I think. May be wrong.
@Zachattack-ot2unАй бұрын
Can you do a French vs British carrier strike group video
@Markus117dАй бұрын
Already addressed this on a different video, They would like to do other navy"s like france & italy for example, but the assets aren't available yet, They will do the other navy"s as they become possible..
@FencerPTSАй бұрын
Just an observation - The type 055 is larger than its counterparts; 6 of these would equate to 7 Burke class in terms of displacement, which in turn provides and equivalent number of VLS cells between the two sides. I wonder if a strike group would add the 7th destroyer if such a fight were anticipated. Another aspect that troubles me about these fights - the aircraft take off after the fight has already started. Wouldn't it make more sense to have at least some of the aircraft in the air at the start of the engagement (if not all of them)?
@Winter_EverfrostАй бұрын
Would love to see zumwalt eventually, both versions the current one and its future refit to give it the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW), it might be able to counter the 055 class of ships.
@qfinckАй бұрын
@grimreapers You're infographic for the Type 055 is wrong. In the sim the Type 055 fired 480 HHQ9Bs but the infographic you posted shows them with 72 a piece for 432 in total. So it looks like in game they have 80 HHQ-9Bs
@jacktwinkie2869Ай бұрын
How about 6 ticos? I know they're getting retired but, go out with a bang ig
@vortex839Ай бұрын
As an American, GG
@icarus_fallingАй бұрын
If only i had the money for this sim
@semperfidelis271Ай бұрын
do you use ship countermeasures ie chaff, flares nulka decoys?
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
No it does not because it's not a naval simulator. It's a digital air combat simulator that has Naval assets. You're going to have to find a naval simulator to realistically do this kind of simulation. As he said this is just for fun
@semperfidelis271Ай бұрын
@@Wyomingchief i was just curious, thanks for clarifying
@AntiOnYTАй бұрын
Day 5 of asking cap to bring humans back to carrier battles
@HansHammertimeАй бұрын
Great vid Cap!
@jianxiinlee738613 күн бұрын
好吧,很有趣,感谢制作,只是这样的场景不会在现实中发生。
@ragnarokx112823 күн бұрын
Compare carier with destroyer is like compare truck with infsntry tactical vehicle dude, those are destroyer mean to destroy everything they have ability to eliminate whole navy f-18 fleet at once.
@caspianlola7776Ай бұрын
correction china is launching its 10th type 055 so... GG WP
@wingowingo292813 күн бұрын
did you model the yj21 with mach6 or mach10 and terminal maneuver?
@user-wh9er8pe9nАй бұрын
A loyal dog of the United States. In the Middle East, American aircraft carriers can't even defeat guerrillas.😅A loyal dog of the United States. In the Middle East, American aircraft carriers can't even defeat guerrillas, but in your video, they can challenge Chinese fleets.😅😅
@joed1015Ай бұрын
Could we please see an all asian carrier battle? Izuma and Kaga vs Liaoning, Shandong. Maybe South Korea supports the Japanese with two Sejong The Great destroyers attached to their groups (similar vla to Ticonderoga). Thanks
@spencer7404Ай бұрын
Dude, do you know any Asian history at all? Korea and Japan will never be really on the same side.
@joed1015Ай бұрын
@spencer7404 Yes, I know history pretty well, actually. And seeing how you are not aware of the JAROKUS pact it is my pleasure to be the one to inform you that both countries signed a security pact in 2023 and have already participated in war games together and will do so again in 2024. They are both proud democracies with shared rivals. I am glad to be the one who got to tell you.
@spencer7404Ай бұрын
@@joed1015 I know about that. It's just a show for the US. It means nothing. Those two have zero trust in each other. In fact, they will both enjoy sitting and watching the other one die. Let's wait and see how Yun Seok-yeol ends up with first. Then you may talk about the so-called pact, as a joke. The Koreans don't like his decision so much. And cut the ideology naive BS. The world doesn't work that way. It's about money and power. And if you know Asian history, as you claim, most of the time, Korea, China, and Japan got along with each other pretty well. As for rivals, Japan's gonna bite the US sooner or later. This country knows when to kneel. And China is a partner of Korea. They need each other more than you think. Watch less fake brainwashing news.
@briandelaroy16706 күн бұрын
So in reality the Us would have the carrier along with destroyers, cruisers, and attack subs and the last 3 ships mentioned all would have anti ship missiles. The ships also have anti aircraft/ missile defense. But as you properly did the us would also include ally ships in operations in certain type of operations. However our aircraft carriers have the F35s so the air wing would definitely launched to also counter the 055 type destroyers causing the Chinese to either loose their ships or turn and break off!
@soshelp40854 күн бұрын
😂first day interested in military?
@soshelp40854 күн бұрын
in reality, YJ21 is just too OP, u can tell just by looking at this made up video
@tomsmith5584Ай бұрын
And to think that they're doing stuff like this on more powerful equipment, and getting paid a lot of money to do this, at the Pentagon, Whitehall and the MoD in Beijing.
@tuto-ct2wi12 күн бұрын
Even absurd than battlefield man
@MrEddyboy88ukАй бұрын
Cap great video as always…. One consideration I keep thinking about during this series is the anti ship planes once launched anti ship weapons they should engage other planes with short range
@GlitchyGamers18Ай бұрын
It’s a dcs limit. AS units cannot engage enemy air unless it’s self defence
@keichng5350Ай бұрын
Cap can u add zumwalt with their special hypersonic missle
@DarkStriker1-1Ай бұрын
can you do a whole navy vs whole navy or is that too much?
@outrider425Ай бұрын
they would need a NASA PC for that 😂
@david7384Ай бұрын
way too much
@colbunkmustАй бұрын
Depends on the navies in question. Swiss Navy vs Paraguayan Navy is totally doable(technically both of those nations have naval contingents...sorta).
@IetsgoBrandonАй бұрын
@@colbunkmust Mongolian Navy is surely doable, lol
@colbunkmustАй бұрын
@@IetsgoBrandon I actually wrote Mongolian Navy first instead of Paraguayan, but it was too much of an insult to DCS, plus technically the "Mongolian Navy" wasn't really a military/armed branch even though it was at one point a government owned service.
@foulball13219Ай бұрын
Great video.
@NathansWargamesАй бұрын
RAF akrotiri could be vital soon for the west IRL
@colerobillard1909Ай бұрын
I’m new to this but would these destroyers ever get within firing range of their anti ship missles? Seems like the advantage of an aircraft carrier is like having aircraft that can out range a ship
@felipeherrera6118Ай бұрын
I know this is DCS which is avaliable on steam but i always thought it was just fighter jets that were allowed. how are you using naval assets?
@robertnemeth62486 күн бұрын
You gave the US and China their most powerful escorts but only gave the UK 2 T45s instead of 6.....not right.
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-EАй бұрын
Can you do a video without the limit speed of an object? ( I mean in Navy War game)
@sportingusa21 күн бұрын
Since when can the US or UK defend against hypersonic missiles? The carrier groups are sitting ducks…
@astizo854611 күн бұрын
Well they did in Ukraine via Patriot and i suppose the German Iris-T.
@JohnDoe022412 күн бұрын
YJ-21 is ballistic antiship missile😅 DCS just an outdated cold war simulator
@christopherwright5713 күн бұрын
Question: Is it possible to create a stealth missile?
@iamscoutstfuАй бұрын
Isn't SM6 capable of anti-shipping now?
@grimreapersАй бұрын
Yup.
@ChihHaoChenАй бұрын
6*055 DDG vs 6*B-1B w/LRASM
@SydWaters1776Ай бұрын
If real war started, and going with nukes wont be used, how long could any country expect to keep affording, monetarily, too replace destroyed top of the line equipment? Planes, tanks, ships...all of it..at what point would a country be forced to go back a generation or 2 of a given piece of equipment? Let's say its the 3rd year of a back and fourth hard fought war, both sides are having medium to heavy losses. With the cost of the top equipment being so much money, I feel like at some point the top equipment would no longer be an option for replacement. F35 back to F15 type of situation. US VS Russia/China... how long could each country keep replacing top of the line with top of the line?
@FleetDefenderRA5Ай бұрын
Afghanistan demonetized?
@Doodelz02Ай бұрын
That was nonsense. Sorry to hear that, Cap. I thought it an interesting fly-by of earth terrain I'll never otherwise get to see. (plus enormous fun with your team, of course!)
@grimreapersАй бұрын
Yeh that was just weird and annoying of them.
@tinglisic8088Ай бұрын
The 055s are modeled so they have 80 hhq 9b-s each not 72 because they had 480 of them and 480/6=80
@theflamingcomet4620Ай бұрын
W vid
@regarded9702Ай бұрын
It's been up for 4 minutes
@andyf4292Ай бұрын
2 carrier groups vs 6 destroyers?
@docauger2032Ай бұрын
Hey gents are CHs assets working again for the common man, or are you still having to fix them. Sorry for asking but CH dosent answer his trouble tickets. Thanks
@weichen464029 күн бұрын
8 type 055? your old info needs some update
@JoeyRay-fz1qeАй бұрын
Stupid simulation, A Carrier Group has that many Cruisers and Destroyers among other support ships and you add a UK Carrier Group. If it was the Prince of Wales it wouldn't make if far from port!
@user-th2tb9sw4g26 күн бұрын
What game is this?
@marklipsinic7916Ай бұрын
This is so dumb. The whole point of a US carrier group is FORCE PROJECTION. The Chinese destroyers would never get in missile range before the carrier launched all its strike-capable aircraft to attack them. Plus, while the strike aircraft are executing their mission, the US carrier group would be steaming in the opposite direction of the Chinese task force to keep them out of their missile range.
@user-jp2tf5fj5kАй бұрын
If US carrier get to the opposite position, where will these planes land? The bases around China but also covered by their ballistic missiles?
@sergarlantyrell7847Ай бұрын
What does it take to beat 6x Type 055 destroyers? How about 1x Astute/Virginia/Seawolf class submarine? My money would be on the sub.
@user-ii7mo4wg5hАй бұрын
知道什么叫驱逐舰吗
@user-ii7mo4wg5hАй бұрын
叫老鼠攻击猫愚蠢程度让人难以置信
@sergarlantyrell7847Ай бұрын
@@user-ii7mo4wg5h Are mice DESIGNED to have heavyweight torpedoes that can do this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a6qlfcR4q9GnnZs.html to ships? Your entire analogy is false. Nuclear submarines are purpose built ship-killers (and killers of other subs). By contrast, destroyers are primarily designed for AAW and ASW is secondary.
@user-jp2tf5fj5kАй бұрын
🤣
@zilongna3106Ай бұрын
你是想让潜艇来送人头吗
@smacman68Ай бұрын
I know it’s got to be a cast iron bitch to A come up with ideas for entertaining videos B try and please all sides in the viewership and C do it every other day. I personally am neutral on these carriers battles because they don’t really take into consideration all the things that would happen in reality. It’s basically leakage of anti ship missiles. Whichever side prevents the most leakage wins. I much prefer the historical recreations and re-enactments. With the maps we have now in DCS there are tons of historical and interesting topics. Just the Sinai map alone is enough for a month’s worth of videos. Any way, that’s my 2 cents for what it’s worth
@NemoGraynameA8Ай бұрын
Anyone who thinks the battles using modern or near future tech are going to be realistic are idiots. It's fun to watch, like a sports match, but pretending that the made up numbers are reflections of reality is madness. Or how you end up with F-15s lol
@sablephoenixАй бұрын
This is assuming that the Chinese have a functional carrier, or even a blue-water navy that can actually meet the U.S. at parity, neither of which they actually have in reality.
@SandersBernie-dl6in20 күн бұрын
Right... so the 055 in alaska was just a figment of everyone's imagination. LOL Cope harder
@blameusa7082Ай бұрын
chinese sponcers?
@dexlab7539Ай бұрын
Nope. If anything US sponsors
@BFZ-r4m17 күн бұрын
所以欧美有哪款近防炮能拦截YJ-21么?那玩意是弹道导弹
@Four9sFineJewelryАй бұрын
West Taiwan is taking notes.
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-EАй бұрын
DCS is not real as in real life
@Four9sFineJewelryАй бұрын
@@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E thanks, captain obvious.
@david7384Ай бұрын
@@Mr.Su-35Flanker-Etrue, in real life, China has thousands of ground based anti ship missiles 🙄
@jeremyjackson8196Ай бұрын
Is there no wind in DCS?
@harryspeakup8452Ай бұрын
You can set wind in DCS
@grimreapersАй бұрын
You can add it in.
@lovepapa9559Ай бұрын
Where are Russia ship?
@cyronaderАй бұрын
Cap in this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r9JdrcaZ0M7WiX0.html you showed America could defend against 50 DF26s....Are the YJ21s faster than the DF26?
@grimreapersАй бұрын
hmmm yes that is interesting. I would expect DF-26 to be about the same speed as YJ-21. My suspicion is that the problem is that the YJ-21 is now traveling a lot lower than it used to. It may be causing problems for the interceptors?
@cyrusjalali1571Ай бұрын
So the YJ 21 have 100% PK? Is that how CH modeled them to be?
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-EАй бұрын
Maybe
@yuning8045Ай бұрын
They don't, I remember CH saying something like 70% PK.
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
No they don't have a 100 percent pk.
@chuckd9007Ай бұрын
Cant call it a sim when it doesnt accurately depict weapon performance.
@affankhan5645Ай бұрын
First view . Love Ur videos
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqАй бұрын
lol balance and fun really ? you don't remember older carrier battle video you made where blue side alway enjoy much more aircraft , human pilot , mass equip F-35 and basically go turkey shot the red team with way less aircraft , 4th gen jet , all AI no human ? where were the balance and fun you care about at that time ?today when red team start having some OP stuff , you suddenly care about .....fair and balance + fun ? you really think people gonna forget your super bias toward blue team to the point even when you allow red team have J-35 you still heavy nerf them with only 2x PL-15 instead of 4 ? while mass equip all blue team F-35 with 4x AIM-260 each that doesn't even exist yet .......it even more funny when MAKO missile only exist currently as display model but you still go and mass equip blue team with it ...tbh may i ask you equip the red team with all similar "display model future weapon" for fair/balance and fun too ? because red team also have alot of them
@paulefc1971Ай бұрын
Jesus Christ, its a game, calm down
@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqАй бұрын
@@paulefc1971 yes a bunch of heavy bias toward blue team and misleading game show ...he never care about fair and balance for the red team before . but suddenly do it the momment red team start to have some really OP weapon system
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
@@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqseriously dude cry harder, I've been watching cats videos since he's been on youtube. Unless you got a link to prove what you're saying, I think you're making it all up. Also when it comes to the Mako it's actually gone into production and we have proof at work unlike the mythical Chinese stuff😂😂
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
@@HoangNgocThanh-qy8cqoh yeah if it hurts your feelings so much why do you still watch
@agnesakioyamen2576Ай бұрын
@@WyomingchiefHe’s said before in a yt comment that every time “blue team” wins, he gets more money but when they lose, he gets less money in terms of donations or something like that.
@ITeachChinese17 күн бұрын
😂😂
@kencope1984Ай бұрын
pointless
@haire618Ай бұрын
You know I keep watching these videos, carriers groups and everything else. But you always say what's the aircraft Carrier's name? The navy's defeated, but naval warfare has never been fought from a Carrier. That's always been fought from the ships. And the ships are still there to do the damage back to the other ships and possibly still win. It's about the last man's standing. Not just who's Carrier's gone?
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
It's also strictly for entertainment purposes, it's also doing Naval simulation on an air combat simulator. There are limitations and maybe not take things so serious
@haire618Ай бұрын
@Wyomingchief when doing digital warfare .you expect the process to work as best as possible. Don't call it the most accurate simulator in the world if u can't do the real spec of these battles and call it the world's my accurate simulator just like the hq9 and d series missile from China are crap and so is the radar of the china's military and Russia .but seem only everyone but Russia and China weapons have flaws in this simulator
@-qsprey7881Ай бұрын
I don't see anyone complaining, yet the comments criticizing others for complaining got the most likes and replies, Lol that's what Americans are like...
@Doodelz02Ай бұрын
GR valued viewers: Please don't stop commenting. Some are incredibly inciteful. I read many every day! Almost everyone does it respectfully, and who could ask for more than that!?!
@imawumaoandprocnАй бұрын
you don't see because this channel practice very heavy censorship and remove comment complain about his hate toward red team and very bias toward blue team in many way
@AmirShafeekАй бұрын
@@imawumaoandprocnIm an American and gr is deffo bias towards the West
@WyomingchiefАй бұрын
@@imawumaoandprocnoh my God can you complain anymore? Where exactly did cap touch you that hurt you? Get a grip dude if you don't like it then don't watch😂😂
@Markus117dАй бұрын
And yet the presenter repeatedly says about being criticised for things and saying sorry " people it's how the core game models it" ect, In fact the video is a giant hey people this is why things are done the way they are & explaining what they can and can't do about how the game processes and models the scenario & it's assets..