Why The US Navy Wants BATTLESHIPS Again (Compilation)

Рет қаралды 1,264,650

Күн бұрын

00:00 Why The US Navy Wants BATTLESHIPS Again
15:36 Incredible Reasons Why US Navy Aircraft Carriers are Almost Impossible to Sink
26:58 British SAS Soldiers vs US Navy SEALs - Military Training Comparison
33:20 Aircraft Carrier Comparison: Chinese Type 001A VS The US Ford Class Carrier - Army / Navy Comparison
43:05 Why China Can Finally Defeat the US Navy
52:18 US Navy vs US Marines - What's The Difference & How Do They Compare? - Army / Military Comparison
58:29 Did the US Navy Actually Teleport a Ship?
1:08:02 US Navy SEAL Team 6 vs Delta Force - Who Would Win / Military Comparison
1:19:14 The US Secret Underwater Spy Technology - The US Navy's SOSUS
1:29:30 US Navy Must Do This to Defeat Chinese in War
1:39:45 US Coast Guard vs Navy - What's the ACTUAL Difference? (Military Comparison)
1:51:20 US Navy "UFO Patents"
1:58:39 US Navy vs British Royal Navy - Army / Military Comparison
2:06:53 US Air Force vs US Navy - Who Would Win? (Military Comparison)
2:19:36 US Navy SEALS vs Russian Spetsnaz - Special Forces Comparison
2:41:55 Why US Navy Is Terrified of China's New Submarine
2:53:58 The First US Navy SEAL
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► kzfaq.info...
🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► / theinfographicsshow
Discord ► / discord
Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
Twitter ► / theinfoshow
💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
www.theinfographicsshow.com
📝 SOURCES:
All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.
Our Secret Weapon for growing on KZfaq ➼ vidiq.com/theinfoshow/

Пікірлер: 520

@martthesling 3 ай бұрын

3 hour infographics video on Battleships? Answer: Yes.

@Halicet 3 ай бұрын

Except the majority of the video isn't about battleships, but general naval assets lol

@martthesling 3 ай бұрын

@@Halicet yeah...🥲

@dherman0001 2 ай бұрын

This is an AI generated script.

@vincentperiolat4610 2 ай бұрын

@@dherman0001 that's exactly what I thought too!

@medic5133 Ай бұрын

how are large ship navys fairing in the black sea post age of drone combat?

@galexymitzelplik9560 3 ай бұрын

Im a 38 yr old man, so why do i get giddy as a schoolboy when thinking about battleships, Aircraft Carriers, Jets and guns?!

@SkyRaider-31 3 ай бұрын

Simple. It make big boom

@crazestyle83 3 ай бұрын

'Cause 'Merica

@Sloneyyy 3 ай бұрын

Honestly because it’s hella awesome homie

@robertmiley4496 3 ай бұрын

Trick question.

@marccamiolo2892 3 ай бұрын

No matter how old we get…boys will be boys. Farts are always funny and things that go boom are always cool!!

@GTGibbs 2 ай бұрын

Former Sosus Operator in the mid Seventies. Fairly accurate telling, so much more went on, the Illustration’s however are too simplified to rate for accuracy. It was a boring repetitive watch string, until we tracked a target, then things actually got exciting. We even were able to plot the courses of enemy targets. Pre- computer era; but it was starting up. Salute to all the Vets and active-duty folks. Ocean Systems Technician Petty Officer GTGibbs. ( The cover story for our rate was;Oceanographic Research Technician, they lied to us to get us to sign us up. And only told us the truth. On the first day of “A” School.

@Liferestart6969 10 сағат бұрын

How are US technical diver in the 70s I actually repaired those units off the coast of Great Britain, Scotland, and Wales

@imbetterthanyouis 3 ай бұрын

for the most inaccurate info on the military , infographics never fails

@aradyngaming6263 3 ай бұрын

Even in the different sections on this video, they contradict their facts. Example, one section stating aircraft carriers have a classified speed over 30 knots "and believed to be 50 knots", then 2 minutes later saying top speed of 36 knots. As prior USN, I think I picked out at least 20 pieces of bad info by the 30 minute mark.

@imbetterthanyouis 3 ай бұрын

@@aradyngaming6263 yeah i know aye

@Frankthetank-zr5mc 2 ай бұрын

yep. It is good to turn on in the background to initiate deep, deep sleep. Those looking for an education need to seek knowledge elsewhere.

@djraythefurry0420 2 ай бұрын

Lol honestly if you want some educational content watch licensed professors or mark Felton 😂 Forgotten weapons The chieftain David Fletcher Bc tank Jesus is yes And there's quite a few more just check for the "licenses of practice" and you will be fine 😂 P.s If you reading knows what a license of practice is I don't have to explain this to you So beyond that hope you have a good day good luck to you and may you find peace in your domain thnx for reading my long comment X3 But for people who do not know what a license of practice is , it is when a person going into a field of study such as psychology for example, And gain enough knowledge in college to earn a license to practice or use their knowledge in the field legally but you can only do so if you have a license that allows you to do it , if the person you're watching doesn't have a license for any field that they're talking about it's probably best to not listen to them 100% 😂

@richardhe5973 2 ай бұрын

Also countries are developing hypersonic missiles just for aircraft carriers. DengFeng etc

@scotthaught1 3 ай бұрын

i like how the graphics in the beginning of video have the battleship moving in reverse

@Vatsyayana87 3 ай бұрын

Its the camera catching up and passing the said ship.. You can tell because the waves start passing at a much faster rate..

@Bluemage014 3 ай бұрын

Uh, correction. USS Missouri and USS Wisconsin were the two battleships in Desert Storm, which were classified as Iowa-class battleships because Iowa was the first one created. Iowa was never in Desert Storm.

@juliodyarzagaray 3 ай бұрын

The New Jersey shelled Druze Militiamen in Lebanon in 1984.

@cubeofcrabs 3 ай бұрын

🤓

@xiaoka 2 ай бұрын

@@juliodyarzagaray desert storm was 1991.

@juliodyarzagaray 2 ай бұрын

@@xiaoka I know. This wasn't Desert Storm. This was Lebnon 1984 in retaliation for Hezbollah's suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine and French army barracks. The New Jersey was brought back before the Missouri and the Wisconsin and actually used in combat in the Middle East first.

@barneyrice8502 2 ай бұрын

NO IT Was Not

@bobbyflynn6352 3 ай бұрын

When are you going to continue the "I survived X days of the invasion" series? We NEED to know how it ends!

@r0d1tub2 3 ай бұрын

Yes, please

@Checklist_STT 3 ай бұрын

Try stopping 16 inch volleys with CIWS. Excalibur-type guidance could also be adapted for 16 inch projectiles, and probably laser guidance too.

@pottyputter05 3 ай бұрын

Excalibur uses GPS

@Checklist_STT 3 ай бұрын

@@pottyputter05 Yes. It does.

@alanbrown397 3 ай бұрын

There's a sayin in military aviation: If you get close enough to the enemy to engage in a dogfight, something has gone SERIOUSLY wrong. The ship launching the 16 inch volley is not going to get within firing range of most targets - and it doesn't have enough top armour to protect against inbound missiles which can actively target soft spots

@berrigo2 3 ай бұрын

Try getting in range with 16in guns when your enemy has antiship cruise missiles

@pauldewees7571 Ай бұрын

More importantly 16 inch shells can be replenished at sea! Missiles, especially v.l.s. launch Missiles have to be replenished pier side.

@SaltyRad 3 ай бұрын

It’s also worth noting that our understanding of trajectories has only increased over time as well meaning there are ways to provide better accuracy with a bullet then there was decades ago.

@robedwards9486 2 ай бұрын

I made the mistake of getting lost on Ft. Bragg in 1992 on National Guard duty while driving a deuce and a half by myself which was already against orders but I was late to Guard duty and had to make the drive by myself. I pulled up to the wire at the guard shack to ask for directions and was on on my face before I knew what happened with many a muzzle pointed at me. My commander had to come get me. I had no idea I just pulled into Deltas kingdom. The fence with razor wire and worn in humvee tracks inside it, in the middle of a fenced in area is there for a reason. Back then anyone could drive on base no questions asked in most areas.

@MrJonesKaraoke 3 ай бұрын

I think the reason they're going to go ahead and introduce these analog systems again. Are they are going to use emp.

@dianapennepacker6854 3 ай бұрын

EMPs? Military equipment is hardened forever now. Maybe not all. Yet much of it is for the exact reasons you fear. Remember we went haywire with Nukes and nuclear strategy back during the Cold War. We legit thought any war would be a nuclear one.

@MrJonesKaraoke 3 ай бұрын

Electromagnetic pulse, Fry's electronic systems efficiently. If they start using that all that push button warfare and guidance system stuff goes to the toilet.

@Quxrk 3 ай бұрын

You cannot hack an analog system is the main reason

@barneyrice8502 2 ай бұрын

Or are Smart Enough To Know It Can be Used Against Them

@Justcurious987 2 ай бұрын

Today’s technology like the electromagnetic gun and laser on an auto or remote battle ship!! The US will never concede the sea to China numerous ship. We will fight inside shade of their defense zone.

@IR_Cheesy 3 ай бұрын

the voice actor is very iconic

@MrJonesKaraoke 3 ай бұрын

I think the voice actors in the AI.

@gforce0311 3 ай бұрын

Bring back the Montana Class and the 18" Guns. With Gluide and Excalibur technology.

@mattgriewahn8554 3 ай бұрын

Never exactly built the Montana, but yeah, a modern version of one would be nice to have one or two of those.

@brandonlevy8680 3 ай бұрын

Iowa class, not, Montana and it was 16" (406) guns.

@gforce0311 3 ай бұрын

@@brandonlevy8680 I am aware of the Iowa class, Montana Class development was mothballed in lieu of the aircraft carrier. The US once fielded the 18"/48 caliber Mark 1 naval guns. So no correction needed thanks

@brandonlevy8680 3 ай бұрын

@@gforce0311 you said "bring back". Which means it was once around and it wasn't. It never made it past the drawing board. So yeah. Correction needed.

@ebenfredclarissa Ай бұрын

@@gforce0311 , never built . So never mothballed.. the design was shelved .

@markredgrave6282 3 ай бұрын

I read once that when the New Jersey was off the coast of Lebanon, some of our Marines were taking artillery or large caliber mortar rounds from an adjacent ridge from their position so they called for naval gunfire support from the New Jersey on the ridge from where they were receiving insurgent fire. So the New Jersey unleashes some volleys from their 16" rifles on the offending position. So New Jersey radios hey Marines did that suppress the fire from the ridge? The Marines answered, yea roger New Jersey, except there's not a ridge there anymore lol!

@barneyrice8502 2 ай бұрын

That Is A Battlewagon for you

@trentwoodfin6641 2 ай бұрын

USS Wisconsin was the last Battleship to see combat, the USS Iowa was decommissioned by Desert Storm

@robertmosher7418 3 ай бұрын

The mysterious unspoken threat the Zumwalt destroyers were not fully capable of destroying? I'm going to go out on a limb and say that would be submarines.

@Ilias_Goddess 2 ай бұрын

the cost of operating these ships

@maxcaysey2844 2 ай бұрын

One thing to note is, that an Ticonderoga class missile cruiser is a quarter of the size of an Iowa class. If you took like a container ship... filled it with MK41 VLC, you could probably hold more than 1000 missiles..

@Stellar001100 2 ай бұрын

At the very least have 100+ Harpoons in disguised containers.

@maxcaysey2844 2 ай бұрын

@@Stellar001100That is actually kind of the design philosophy of the danish frigates. That things come in "container" modules so you can basically tailor the ships for the mission at hand. In reality its a lot more complicated, as you would need to have multiple different container modules and it takes a long time to reconfigure a ship etc. but it is a thing non the less.

@dne9394 3 ай бұрын

Seems like a great job for unmanned submersible gun ships. Imaging a “boat” surfacing 6-8 miles off shore, touting large, auto loading guns, dumping 60-100 rounds onto targets. Then slips below the surface. Retreats and is reloaded.

@kevinstreeter6943 2 ай бұрын

There are countermeasures against missiles. There is none for line of site weapons like guns. When I was in, they developed guided 8 inch shells.

@Stellar001100 2 ай бұрын

Of course there's a counter for guns. Not be in range of them, throw up a smoke screen, let the sub support sink said gunship, air support. If you have to close in for guns, mistakes have already been made.

@teddeebayre3433 2 ай бұрын

No true. Artillery shells can be intercepted.

@audihoez628 2 ай бұрын

For every like I’ll do 5 pushups

@DRPT89 Ай бұрын

We got 5, jffjfhfurffuguf nchfhf cfhhd dhdhdj. 5.. going once.. going twice!!!!!

@kidbusiness112 3 ай бұрын

liked this so much i subbed :D

@thunderchaser2042 2 ай бұрын

Iowa was not the final battleship to see combat. Missouri and Wisconsin were the two deployed to Desert Storm. Iowa had already had her number two turret center gun blow out.

@oculusangelicus8978 3 ай бұрын

The most effective Armor made by the US and UK is Chobham Armor, now, Imagine a battleship made with Chobham armor. Even if a Anti-ship missile made to the battleship it would likely do insignificant damage. and I think if 16 inch artillery shells meant for Battleships are still in stockpile, something I highly doubt, then it would be to America's advantage to update and redesign the massive guns to modern standards with more powerful explosives and also incorporate Excalibur technology into the shells to make them significantly more accurate and able to track moving targets. Plus there are already experiments being conducted to incorporate Ramjet engines into artillery shells (the XM1155 program) which would incorporate long range capabilities into artillery shells and combined with Excalibur smart technology into those shells a new Battleship could send special shells far from being within enemy reach and still do serious damage to and sink enemy aircraft carriers, battleships, submarines and supply vessels without ever endangering itself. If I could have any influence in this kind of project I think I could generate a Battleship that would be virtually unsinkable, and be an enemy navy's worst nightmare. Plus still be able to go broadsides with any of the world's battleships and come out on top with barely a scratch, send the crew out with some fresh paint to repair the only thing damaged in battle, the hull's paint scheme, and markings.

@comradeeverclear4063 3 ай бұрын

Accuracy by Volume

@stevevaughn2040 2 ай бұрын

We had accuracy and volume

@19delta32 2 ай бұрын

31:38 Also colt ar-15 is NOT an automatic rifle. The Navy uses M-16's and M-4's. ( AR stands for ARmalite.)

@barneyrice8502 2 ай бұрын

Exactly Right BUT YOU CAN NOT TELL THAT TO A DEM !!

@samgray49 Ай бұрын

If you really want to be technical, the M16 and M4 are AR-15's. The XM16 was based off of the AR15 which was designed specifically for the Army to create a new weapon to replace the M1 Carbine. It didn't make it, so Armalite released it to civilian while Colt reworked it for military usage, which was later accepted.

@Justone372 3 күн бұрын

Awesome video.

@randallpetroelje3913 2 ай бұрын

I don’t pit brother against another brother, unless they’re in a bar they’re all equally insanely trained and equally capable of handling their missions❤😂

@rawgage9159 2 ай бұрын

I love these videos and want to see them all!

@mrskilz4thrilz 3 ай бұрын

Bring back the battleships with railguns instead of cannons.

@Antares_451 3 ай бұрын

Tri system railguns with a multi system 10 terawatt DE targeting systems.. CIWS an Sparrow for secondary defense systems

@joshuamiller7502 3 ай бұрын

that would just be worse, you lose all the benefit of cannons for the ability to poke tiny holes in the biggest vehicles on earth.

@derekm424 2 ай бұрын

I live where the are testing the actual rail gun... The thing is loud and can be heard from a distance. It's an absolute wonder weapon

@LightS_bRight 2 ай бұрын

World of Warships dropped the ball on not sponsoring this video.

@philipliethen519 2 ай бұрын

Contrary to infographics, the BB’s were not brought back for shore bombardment needs, rather b/c Reagan committed to a 600 ship navy & so many of our cruisers were retiring & building capacity could not fulfill needs, so it was decided to bring the Iowas out & modernize as “real big” missile cruisers, with 16” guns indeed, but also armor sides & deck that could still take absorb significant damage.

@LEGO.0. 3 ай бұрын

Modern battle ship would go crazy

@lfinsterl 3 ай бұрын

one of the most important parts from the wilderness training for SAS is memory. You will be asked to tell the trainers how many trees in an area or what colour a bridge was something like that. If you fail to answer these you are immediately expelled.

@mepps7706 3 ай бұрын

reminded me of Robert De Niro in Ronin 🙂

@smyers820gm 3 ай бұрын

That’s not true

@eze417 3 ай бұрын

It looks like you have your Zumwalt-class destroyer sailing backwards.

@scottmatthews3793 3 ай бұрын

Whatever happened to that Swedish submarine that "sunk" the us carrier in war games, I think they went undetected too

@barneyrice8502 2 ай бұрын

Ha Ha, Yeah I Heard About that

@tonycrabtree3416 3 ай бұрын

I mean, Space Battleship Yamato foretold this!

@LongJohnLiver 3 ай бұрын

Star Blazers!

@billwilmot4820 3 ай бұрын

I want them back but modified a bit, bigger, better, more hightech, imagine it having 100 tomahawks

@jameskirk3 3 ай бұрын

And railguns. Nuclear generator is just about the only thing we have that could power them. Just need to create a barrel that can hold up. Currently they're good for 1-3 shots before they are trash. They are hugely expensive too.

@bradbrandon2506 3 ай бұрын

If the kitty hawk can take all that and float, without the support of a crew, I'd be amazed to see what the Ford could take!

@justintyme720 3 ай бұрын

Someday we will

@sppj3140 3 ай бұрын

When are the challenge videos coming back we all miss those and the I survived nuclear war series

@allandalete2829 3 ай бұрын

VERY NICE VIDEO 🇺🇸 👍 🙂

@waitingforanalibi2224 3 ай бұрын

Before anyone brings up the sub section of the video and mentions the recent RN Sub missile launch fiasco. Can I remind you the vessel and crew (British) performed flawlessly.....The Polaris missile on the other hand............

@franktate9873 3 ай бұрын

A shell is very hard to hit with plane or missle. So the battle ship can be needed and the shells cost less.

@youngstunna1594 3 ай бұрын

Devgru actually offers services for military and civilians…,let say you think you have what it takes to be a seal…, they have civilian courses, and many operators already apart of Jsoc also can and do receive training from Devgru programs…, they are the ROTC of the jsoc world. Other branches special missions groups also have similar but lesser known programs.

@Oceanliner_Enthusiast_ 3 ай бұрын

nice

@BrainScrubUS 3 ай бұрын

Love your content!!! 🚢

@19delta32 2 ай бұрын

It's not Colorado, it's Coronado. You know, at the beach, near the ocean. Where the Navy Seals operate.

@maynardhahn2873 3 ай бұрын

You didn’t mention the F 35 with the aircraft carrier, I’m pretty sure you left a lot more than that out then that highly capable for offensive defense that’s my thoughts

@nickhouck4309 3 ай бұрын

Yeah Ford is so complex that she likely skipped 5 or 10 generations in carrier tech. Usually they include a new system or 2 to work out with a new ship. With ford they developed and improved 23 systems. Thats why it took so long and went way over budget.

@ericnorteman5341 12 күн бұрын

Can the salvos from the battleship be retrofit with jdam?

@herbenevolence4198 2 ай бұрын

Battleships would be the only reason for me to cross-rate to a surface sailor

@user-ds8zk7lt7f 3 ай бұрын

Forget battleships, they need more subs

@SummonedJudge 3 ай бұрын

And the first salvo fired from the second turret on the Iowa blew itself to smithereens killing everyone in it.

@robertmarley8852 3 ай бұрын

Sweet

@spocktn8337 3 ай бұрын

I am 48, have developed cold asthma and feel a bit out of shape put fun to know I can still meet the requirement for a navy seal. A bit hard now but when I did my military service in the Swedish military it would have been very easy. Well i did beat my whole regiment for the running back then.

@SkrappyMFdoo 3 ай бұрын

There's alot more than running requirements 😂 technically at age 48 you don't even meet the age requirement so what are you talking about 😂

@philipthecow 3 ай бұрын

45:30 has some pretty entertaining graphics.

@-00N000N 10 күн бұрын

It is like explosive minigun sat close range vs snipers at close range

@gavincleland9010 3 ай бұрын

I hate when I watch that other copycat channel of yours thats really low effort and does zero research, thinking its your video. Good content again, thanks!

@MattyJ55046 Ай бұрын

The zumwalt was suppose to give us something like a modern day battleship. However, the technology just isn’t quite there yet. I’m sure we are still trying to perfect the zumwalt main weapon system.

@Argylenj 3 ай бұрын

The Missouri was also in combat in the first gulf war

@anned8634 3 ай бұрын

the 16 inch guns can fire a 8 inch saboted rocket assisted perjectal they tested this at NWC China lake back during the vietnam these had a range of 90 miles.

@tobyw9573 3 ай бұрын

Once the round gets above enough of the atmosphere, wind resistance is very low.

@jasoar1563 3 ай бұрын

New concept "optionally crewed arsenal ship"

@demetriousmcculler9211 3 ай бұрын

Newport News shipbuilding thank you

@907travelalot 3 ай бұрын

Interesting

@user-er5im3im1k 3 ай бұрын

I think battleships will be superior if they make the shells smart, just like what they have in their howitzers

@stevenwalker933 3 ай бұрын

just like the russins able to shoot missiles from the barrel of their tanks so can battleships

@brianbrandt25 3 ай бұрын

Battleship vs Houthis. perfect.

@williebrort 3 ай бұрын

For land targets missiles compared to battleship shells are way more expensive.

@user-kn9qn9um1m 2 ай бұрын

P what about this has anything to do with the military wanting new battleships

@donvee2000 26 күн бұрын

1.5 miles in 11 minutes for the seals is nuts. I hear most guys can do it in 10.5. crazy

@tonyzed6831 3 ай бұрын

Why are many of the ships in this video moving backwards?

@DavidCooper-bn6te 27 күн бұрын

Your information and content are good. The narrator maintains a consistent and intelligible pace thats easy to follow, but the "graphics" are childish and cheesy.

@SteelersHigh77 3 ай бұрын

How does the F in SCIF mean 'space'? Who was the brains behind that idea?😂

@strikercwl 3 ай бұрын

The F stands for facility, Infographics while entertaining, gets things wrong a lot. Not massively wrong, but little details here and there.

@BrianBogiaBricky 2 ай бұрын

For explosive power and with the new tech in radar these ships will be almost unstoppable. They probably have missiles and some of the other modern weaponry. Nuclear engines? That I believe with these ships that is needed. What do you think? Of the 3 huge guns with 3 cannons each and just only having 2 huge guns. The 1 huge gun will be replaced with missiles.

@edwardgonzalez4277 3 ай бұрын

Mysterious threat : militia boat carrying a nuclear warhead tipped torpedo. One where the boat launching does not even know they are launching a nuke at the enemy naval target.

@Halicet 3 ай бұрын

Carrier groups are vulnerable to nuclear strike, so that would be a true vulnerability to the strength of US carrier groups (and Chinese or Russian carrier groups). Kinda like hand grenades.. you don't have to hit the target with a nuke... you just need to get it close.

@tonycrabtree3416 3 ай бұрын

@@HalicetHorseshoes and hand grenades. “close is good enough” 😂

@Pgieswein Ай бұрын

battleship Texas with 12' GUNS has been just recently restored.

@youdodat2 3 ай бұрын

What happened to the Rail Gun?

@bender5308 Ай бұрын

The USS Missouri (BB-63) was the last Iowa class battleship that saw action in the Gulf

@knottyash9908 Ай бұрын

The uss Wisconsin was the last one to fire a shot in anger.

@bender5308 Ай бұрын

The USS MISSOURI fired the first shots of the Gulf War

@knottyash9908 Ай бұрын

She did. She also fired 783 16 inch rounds and 28 tomahawk missiles compared to Wisconsin’ 319 16 inch shells and 24 tomahawk missiles. Both ships played a pivotal role in convincing the Iraqis that the us was going to launch a amphibious invasion thus forcing the to divert vast military resources for a invasion that never came.

@teytreet7358 2 ай бұрын

Guided shells would be a game changer

@2844Bottoms 3 ай бұрын

Ok the ASVAB scores max out at 150 so i dont know how you get a 220. The AFQT score is a percentile so it maxes at 99. Not sure where they got that info from.

@craigmorris4083 3 ай бұрын

I've noticed that you keep making ships move backwards.

@teddeebayre3433 2 ай бұрын

The Navy is now perfecting missile re-supply at sea. This is a game changer.

@pinoypilosopo 2 ай бұрын

Next to pop up are drone launching ships

@user-it1cc3pp4x 2 ай бұрын

Our Navy should never be without!!

@josephsmith6777 2 ай бұрын

Seals usually involved water but post gwot they have a counter terrorist group besides regular seals closer to delta the true difference is one needs the navy ones a fully contained unit that has its own intel logistics etc etc

@Tianna160 3 ай бұрын

"Why? Because other places have oil or something? Idk. Video over." -canadian

@SkrappyMFdoo 3 ай бұрын

"Boring and overall not needed....just like canada." - real countries

@CoCo-Philly 2 ай бұрын

It's going to be a Dawgy Dawg world.

@tonypoteete562 3 ай бұрын

Why not do a hybrid Battleship / submarine

@seanchavez5651 3 ай бұрын

Another thing once everyone is out of missiles shoot we still have the 16inch

@cliffwoodbury5319 2 ай бұрын

a battleships with the latest tech largest size and right build would dominate the seas as a modern battleship with as many rail guns as an old battle ships regular cannons would be devastating to enamies. I'm sure there would be many other ultra modern systems they would possess to survive.

@dzeyo651 2 ай бұрын

fancy carrier vs tactical nuke .. game over

@loudtim265 3 ай бұрын

FLAK vs drones. Go!

@auro1986 3 ай бұрын

why? they are sent in numbers with your aircraft carriers, so why not deploy more?

@jujenho 2 ай бұрын

It’s funny seeing ships sailing backwards.

@matthewsecord7641 3 ай бұрын

Battleships are fantastic mobile artillery that's why.

@matthewhuszarik4173 Ай бұрын

You are wrong about the explosive charges in missiles versus bursting charges in battleships shells. Most battleship shells had a bursting charge of less than 100lb. Most surface to surface missiles have warheads of at least 500lb. The damage battleship shells did was due to their weight and momentum not the bursting charge.

@nickhouck4309 3 ай бұрын

We wouldn't need unguided shells if we just manufactured systems that we already paid to develop. This would drop the price of guided munitions much closer to where it should be. Like for example why are we developing new land attack missiles that we cant afford when we already have ones that work great that we could be making more of them wich would drastically drop the overall cost.

@butspan7618 3 ай бұрын

sir why would you need guided shells to bombard dudes in a trench.

@vmlinuxz 2 ай бұрын

A secure scif? Is that trunps bathroom?

@danielerickson3391 2 ай бұрын

Too change them into huge anti drones shields

@Mr-Wolf117 3 ай бұрын

Makes me wanna play world of Warships lol

@45atanner 3 ай бұрын

I mean having 12 16inch guns that can devistate anything is crazy

@da_mitchello2815 3 ай бұрын

So like… why has no one made sailing drones? If an aircraft carrier just had swarms and swarms of explosive drones that could protect it, whether it be in the air from missiles or from smaller boats on the water, imagine adding an emp to those drones. I wonder if an emp burst could knock out a missile’s tracking capability and increase the chance of it missing. They’re cheap and have proven to be quite reliable as of late.

@AJVD2123 3 ай бұрын

Naval drones are a thing if that's what you're referring to. Estonie is notoriously working on unmanned boats and recently, a Russian ship was sunk by a Ukrainian unmanned suicide boat.

@da_mitchello2815 3 ай бұрын

@@AJVD2123 yeah I’m thinking swarms are the next threat instead of smaller boats, drones go crazy. Ships need to have like a couple emp bursts that disperse around them if they wanna take out mass swarms but even then, if they were sent out in constant waves it could be quite problematic.

@AJVD2123 3 ай бұрын

@@da_mitchello2815 Defence communities have known for a very long time that the main threat to any counter-measure has always been saturation. And with the advent of drones and other unmanned systems, it has become easier, safer and cheaper than ever to saturate extremely expensive pieces of hardware. It's something that is revealing a new challenge for modern military thinkers. We can no longer use missiles valued at several million dollars to intercept drones that barely cost a fraction of that. Especially if they send enough to completely overrun our defences.

@maynardhahn2873 3 ай бұрын

Yeah, but what about all the collateral damage?