Taking a few steps at a time between this and AI infrastructure tbh . Love to see it

My dyson sphere broke after just 3 months, and unfortunately I was out of the return period at target. So if you need one I have one handy, doesn't work great though.

@@TheGreyLineMatters a step is still a step.

We will have to develop new materials and material synthesis methods. Then mine the asteroid fields for rare earth minerals. This will take generations but it is what we will need to even begin truly exploring and colonization of the local galaxy.

sci-fitards never learn critical thinking.. a dyson sphere is physically impossible.

Thank You, I came here to say the same thing after seeing this irritating video on my TV KZfaq where I can't make comments.

Efficiency doesn't matter Because the energy source is unlimited (sun) Even if it's 5% Efficient it's still free energy

Thanks captain, they needed your input.

Yea and maybe poke the biggest hole in the atmosphere. And fry some birds as usual.

They should focus on solving real world (down here) problems. The world will be going to the toilet soon.

​@@evielknievel4972 There's already a job for every problem you can think of. If you don't like the way something is being done there's nothing stopping you from pursuing it.

We need scientology more than ever now

Why go through so much work to do this when we have a huge area called the Sierra desert? It is a massive area that has almost no cloud cover and receives more sunlight than any other place on earth. What I suggest is set up focus light energy generation plants along the coast of the Sierra desert that takes sea water and boils it to create steam, that steam turns turbines that make energy, the steam is then cooled by putting it into a distillery and turned into fresh water that then can be split into Hydrogen by the power produced by the turbines. The Hydrogen then can be shipped in containers containing Hydride by Hydrogen powered ships to anywhere on earth and be used to run vehicles and heat homes. This would create endless clean Hydrogen from the sun the advantage with this system is just like any fuel it can be stockpiled in abundance and used when ever it is needed unlike solar energy that is hard to store for a long period of time.

Perhaps some of the weirder anomalies we are seeing around other stars (the transit light dipping) is because extraterrestrial civilizations have already mastered this? who knows - i guess we will know soon enough.

​@@urgreatestenemy3044 ignoring everything else, solar power doesn't necessarily mean it's better. The cells lose efficiency when they get too hot and it lowers the lifespan of the cells. Places that get a lot of sun and more mild temps are much better

@@mulattofy You are thinking of solar panel power plants I'm talking about the mirror type power plants that focus light on one point and heats sea water to create steam that then turns turbines.

@@scroopynooperz9051 interesting theory, ya never know out there... whole stars being utilised to benefit an advanced race

Then we wouldn't need to use so much energy and the problem would be solved without a giant death ray from space.

That you have to create for yourself.

There's nothing new under the sun 🌞

That just tells me that even though this is newly released technology, it’s already over 20 years old in development. Someone must have thought about it in order for it to make it in that game all those years ago.

​@@desmondstanley4372dude, people thought about this idea simce the 60's. Science already knows how to fix lots of stuff, the problem is funding. We can end hunger and poverty right now, but there's no will to do that.

Exactly what I thought! Microwave energy.

Within our grasp? NTHU (Near Term Human Extinction) is upon us. CO² is around 500ppm, when you take into account methane and nitrous oxide. 100-200 species are going extinct each day and this has been going on for years. This is MSM peddling hopium, because the truth is too hard for them to pass along to people. So sad...

Kinda. His transmitters of longitudinal vibrating electric field were on the ground not in space.

@@car9167 And extremely impractical because of the inefficiencies.

@@menotyou8369 That I'm not sure since nobody built and measure one today. This is not regular transverse electromagnetic wave but a pulsed on direction of propagation electric field. The magnetic component is ignored. Unless you know somebody tried and measured... please post a link if you have one

It’s what Nikola was already doing and the government killed and took his work and classified it, now they are just taking credit for his work

Der Sinn des Lebens liegt nicht im Aussen, er ist in Dir drinnen. Deine eigene spirituelle Entwicklung ist das allerwichtigste in dieser Inkarnation. Das andere ist eine 2. Geschichte zu der man bestimmt sein kann, es ist die Lebensaufgabe die auf Deine Erfahrungen während der spirituellen Entwicklung, basiert...hat nichts mit Kirche oder Religion zu tun...

Life is what YOU make of it.

Lol we have Google too

@@coronalight77 no, Buddy, you have google, we have Bing A.I

@@crazycutz8072 A fight! A fight! A Bard and a Bing! lol

I don’t think anyone was wondering… you just wanted to share that you knew something. 😂

@@georgelopez4193 Actually, _I_ was wondering. So, I went and looked it up. I figured if I was wondering, someone else might be wondering, too. Therefore, I wanted to share what I had just learned. Cynical much?

MSM still peddling hopium to the masses, even in the face of biosphere collapse and NTHU (Near Term Human Extinction)... 👍🏻😭

This is a scam. No telecommunication authority would approve this as it is dangerous to people. It's noninising radiation, but at high level it literally cooks you alive, we are talking about 1k-100k more power than a mobile cell tower.

Yeah, what joy. I can see more trash like Bluewalker 3. Yippee!

I wouldn't really call this much of an advance. This technology has been around for ages. Just no one has bothered to attempt a space based microwave energy transmission. Granted, new ideas and technology has made the technology more efficient. Efficient enough that transmitting it from space may be viable.

Are you a trained/educated physicist?

@@fredr3101 You bet. I teach it at a college in Az. Why do you ask?

@@resresres1 The concept is not new but just getting it to be feasible is.

The military will want to turn it into a nation melting weapon

They are directing microwaves over long distances. Darpa has this tech already and has weaponized it. Nothing new here.

Death star

Jewish space lasers have left the chat.

Dr. Evil agrees, and would like to see your resume. 😅

It also came with its own disaster scenario for when the beam misses its target.

I came to the comments to see if anyone else made this connection 😂 Little scary how similarly its described.

Good point. Gotta protect this Nikolai Tesla kind of tech from Edison-like thieves and scoundrels.

@@linux750 What you just said, jon, was profound. So profound as to inspire a fundamental world-changing awareness injection into the human collective consciousness. That aspect of our phenotype is now in a state of rapid evolution. Not for the first time, our tool use has driven our development. That tool, of course, is the one we use to communicate with, which is a set of tools working constantly as one big tool. Speaking of tools, you have identified an archetype that could be used to construct an iconoclastic defense against the meme of profiting, vampiring of individual human intellect. The opening statement of a future court case: My Client was Edisonized by Mr.(Bates, Jobs, Musk, Bezos, whoever). Or this opening statement in a supreme court case: If these corporations are allowed to edisonize this humanity-changing discovery, it will result in the permanent enslavement of the majority of humanity by that minority of society, thus the emergence of new species of humans that exclusively prey upon other humans. Thus H G Wells has manifested his prediction for the future in his novel: The Time Machine.

@@oo2free “The human spirit must prevail over technology.” - A. Einstein

Open source is the only safe way, sadly the inventor doesn't get paid that way.

Tesla

how did you get these big emojis lol

Yes, I read his book many years ago. However, I've since seen a lecture about Thorium reactors where the speaker pointed out that even if you could get the material in orbit at no cost it still wouldn't be profitable in comparison to other energy sources. Also, I'm just a little uncomfortable despite protestations to the contrary, about the effects of microwaving the atmosphere and its effects on water vapour and hence climate. As to powering aeroplanes with microwaves, TV reporters shouldn't think out loud.

@@harryflashman3141 Well, I wouldn't trust a thorium-reactor dude for a walk around the corner. Neither do I trust these dudes, but it sonds more plausible. Micorwaves can be emmitted in wavelenghts that do not interfere with anything, otherwise we would be already fried as these are widely used for telecoms.

O'Neill envisaged space solar as the primary industrial reason for settling cislunar space. Providing jobs that help Earth with unlimited carbon-neutral energy while humanity expands ever further into the solar system for jobs, manufacturing, and scientific knowledge.

CME will fry the whole constellation.

When he killed the power to the drone for the second time - I just saw the engineer's heart sink. "Ooo Oooo Ooooo.....can we power an object moving and 700mph" - What a muppet.

And even if those frequencies are not ionizing, if water still absorbs some of that energy could it raise temperatures in areas with a lot of water vapor? More studies should be conducted. DARPA has proved pumping energy into the atmosphere can have surprising effects.

The only way it works is to put the system in geosynchronous orbit so that it doesn't wander away from the ground-based station aimpoint. The amount of energy required to do that per kilogram of solar panel would exceed the amount of energy it could convert over a 50 year lifetime. So the whole thing is just a greenwash boondoogle. It might be useful for military applications (powering comms or EW surrepititiously), but it's NOT at all "green".

You’re the guy that should stay as far away from these kinds of research projects as possible

Uses microwaves like a microwave oven to wirelessly transmit power

would this be the first step in building a dyson sphere?

I speak many things out in the wrong way. This energy will be trapped here anyway if it comes in. And the only way to negate it would be to make Earth lose energy. The only way that I know of, how Earth can lose energy, would be when there is very little co2 in the atmosphere (and other particles as well) so that sunrays can travel out into space. So that Earth can reflect the red light. You see what I mean? The only way to bring this energy out is to make Earth reflect red light XD which they bombard Earth with, for those machines to work in the first place. It's a dead end

Once again humanity invents powerful machines, like the combustion engine, without a single thought about the consequences. Simply to invent something at all. Something invented is better than nothing, right? Right?

​@neverrl3379 the energy unused could be beamed back up and out of atmosphere. But I understand what you're getting at. But they're non ionizing energy! Ohhhhh splitttt....non ionizing lol

Fax. Notice the interview didn’t further Inquire about the heat. And how are they gonna make beam stronger w/out harm. 😑

@@neverrl3379as long as shareholders get ROI they don’t care about consequences.

Micro meteors will destroy these.

yeah exactly, its almost like we already are!

hows is that a breakthrough, look at their publication, this is garbage

​@@cstuartdcsure buddy

What’s your qualifications to speak on this topic !??

It's huge and very costly.

'BATTERYLESS BATTERIES': (copy and paste from my files): To help power equipment in outer space: Potential endless energy source basically anywhere in this universe: a. Small aluminum cones with an electrical wire running through the center of the cones, cones spaced apart (not touching I'm thinking) but end to end. b. Electromagentic radiation energy in the atmosphere interacts with the aluminum cones. c. Jostled atoms and molecules in the cone eventually have some electrons try to get away from other electrons of which those electrons gather at the larger end of the cone, of which also creates an area of positive charge at the smaller end of the cone. d. The electron's in the wire are attracted to the positive end of the cone and the positive 'end' in the wire are attracted to the negatively charged end of the cone. e. Basically a 'battery' has been created inside the electrical wire itself, different areas of electrical potential. Basically a 'wire battery' or a 'batteryless battery', however one wanted to call it. f. Numerous cones placed end to end increases the number of 'batteries' in the wire. (In series to increase voltage, in parallel to increase amperage). * Via QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics) whereby electromagnetism interacts with electrons in atoms and molecules, one would have to find the correct 'em' frequency for the correct material being utilized for the cones. The shape of the cones could also come into play. The type and size of the wire as well as the type and thickness of the insulation between the cones and the wire would also be factors. * Of course also, possibly 2D triangles made up of certain materials with a conductor going down through the center of the triangle could possible achieve the same 'batteryless' battery system. * Plus possibly with the 2D concept, layered 2D's that absorb different energy frequencies, thereby increasing the net output.

He's talking about a massive Qi charger basically

Yeah it's always about money and not saving the earth.

@@eligebrown8998 all "alternative energy" technology is about the money - not saving earth. FYI... lol

Our just have multiple sats

It wont affect anything, that's why its so cool

2:06, he already felt hot in that small contraption and they plan to make a bigger one, I don't know, the Earth is already hot as it is.

@@inventorknowledge703 that transmitter is a prototype and if it is recieving energy then it can use some of that energy to cool itself and transmit out the rest. would be like a fridge sending out electricity to the rest of the house.

@@Deathwish026 Bruh, that's not how it works, Net energy gain, equals more heat. heat = energy, the problem is we need to transmit energy away from earth faster then we cause it to build up. for that we need to reduce green house gas levels in the atmosphere because they reflect the heat / energy back to earth and continue to heat the atmosphere.

I feel like money (and the potential thereof) is what writes those results... oh, and the ability to weaponize the tech. I'm pretty sure these folks aren't motivated by the possibility of bringing energy to sub-Saharan Africa.

This is a scam. No telecommunication authority would approve this.

I mean, it's always been possible... but why have we suddenly thought it a good idea to start putting tons of extremely high power RF beams raining down on us? We're not just talking television service transponders or something. This is like HAARP transmitters on steroids to become useful.

Not only does this seem dangerous due to it being microwaves, I also feel like this is a smoke and mirror act. We just have to take their word for it that the drone they tested it on didn’t have a battery in it?…. Also wouldn’t it be a massive flaw if all it takes is some guys hand to shut off power to whatever the microwaves are powering?

i totally agree, this is the equivalent to standing infront of a microwave with the door oven. They say it is non ionising, so assuming they are transmitting at super high frequency, That is still not good for you ( im not a 5G hater ). And what happens if an array in space gets misaligned, a tength of a degree in space is a couple of miles on earth = rotisserie city, just like grandma made them.

@@pizzasteve haha if 5g has people worried, wait till they hear about unconfined microwaves 😃

​@@austinbevis4266exactly, the clouds in our atmosphere would block the signal just like it does now with solar.

And that's low power compared to something needed to power a city or state. If it does take off and something goes wrong, many people will die and the corporations will just say sorry.

Well being a 3-5 watt light bulb was enough to make a guy feel hot, imagine the 4+kw required for a house. It could power your home and melt steel at the same time.

WHY would microwave radiation affect the ozone layer?

@@reh3884 actually shooting microwaves though the atmosphere could produce ozone if I remember correctly. I don't think it would deplete it. Now cooking the guy standing on the ground... that's a real possibility. God forbid they lost control of it and it kept transmitting, it would become a WMD.

@@reh3884 i don't know too much about the atmosphere. All i know is that we're already damaging it, and I want to know if this solution is going to be less damaging than others. If you're transmitting a city worth of power from space, there's logically at least some loss to the atmosphere and i want to know if that's worse than current solutions.

@@redpug5042 I think the possibility of harvesting solar power in near future to run cities and homes without any emission of greenhouse gases is the real deal for now and I’m all in for that. However, the dissipated energy could heat up the environment more ? There is a possibility that the lost energy could radiate the existing greenhouse gases and advancing global climate change further rapidly. Correct me if I’m wrong.

global warming 😂

There’s nothing wrong with our planet.

It will affect the environment, if there's too many of them.

@@niluss6 lol, nah

The only people who believe in climate change, live in big cites or are too young to have watched the tax scam evolve.

@@xploration1437 yeah, you missed the "whoa!! thats hot!!!" part, didn't you. The sheep can only see unicorn's and their biases.

A swarm of vacuum cleaners?

@@thatguyoverthere8355

@@thatguyoverthere8355 10 out of 10!

Effectively, yeah.

Yep, pretty much. If we get particular about it, it's more accurately a Dyson swarm, as it's a bunch of satellites instead of one solid structure.

Yes, not the stories of how the Space Shuttles were supposed to pay for themselves via launching private stabilities and now we pay musk to learn to navigate in space. Let's keep that mum.

Why go through so much work to do this when we have a huge area called the Sierra desert? It is a massive area that has almost no cloud cover and receives more sunlight than any other place on earth. What I suggest is set up focus light energy generation plants along the coast of the Sierra desert that takes sea water and boils it to create steam, that steam turns turbines that make energy, the steam is then cooled by putting it into a distillery and turned into fresh water that then can be split into Hydrogen by the power produced by the turbines. The Hydrogen then can be shipped in containers containing Hydride by Hydrogen powered ships to anywhere on earth and be used to run vehicles and heat homes. This would create endless clean Hydrogen from the sun the advantage with this system is just like any fuel it can be stockpiled in abundance and used when ever it is needed unlike solar energy that is hard to store for a long period of time.

@@urgreatestenemy3044 as a cover to direct more tax moneys towards what inevitably will be the building of bunkers for the 1% on the moon...that's why we want it to be generated from space. All the things you suggest will create pollution. In our already heavily polluted planet. Where the 1% still have to live.

​@@urgreatestenemy3044i did not expect that comment after seeing your pfp. kudos for thinking independently.

​@@jd35711what are my social views based on my pfp?

it depends upon the density of the clouds. thunder storms, no.

The moment I saw him block the flow with his hand, I thought the same thing. The only gain I can see is maybe beaming it down during the night, as long as the sky is clear.

it's possible to do it through clouds, but I don't think the prototypes they're using will make it through clouds. they mentioned they're using non ionizing wave lengths. if you want to go through the clouds I think you would need smaller wave lengths and such entering the ionizing ranges, so it would probably come with a hazardous air zone immediately about the receiver where the beam would go

The advantage of space based solar is the collection source can be beyond the Earth's shadow so that it can collect solar energy 24/7. The receiver stations on earth can be located in dry desert climates that have few clouds to maximize efficiency and then distributed from there thru transmission lines. It's a long way off if it's ever even economically viable in the first place.

@@quietus13 nope, that does not work well.... For the same reason that solar collection in those places does not work as well. How do you move the power? On wires? they lose electricity ever meter. In batteries? 1) EXPENISVE and 2) they lose power also The best idea I have heard of is using artificial fuel ( like gasoline). You use the solar power to create carbon neutral fuel and then transport it to where ever. Yes you lose energy in this process also, BUT you lose LESS then the other systems and it is cheaper as well then the batteries. Plus if we use that, then we can switch older cars to synthetic gas and help with pollution. Right now the only place trying this idea (artificial fuel) is using nuclear power. I would rather see solar used then creating more nuclear waste.

Why should a cost even be factored?? Money is such an antiquated concept for World-saving technology.

The problem with your question is "How much it will cost". It doesn't have to cost anything. The monetary system is too ingrained in our brainwashed minds.

Well, one thing for sure, this is another utility driven energy distribution system, which means take from the many and give to the few. Home rooftop solar puts a little bit of money in everyone's pocket. This will take a little bit of everyone's money and put it in the pockets of a few.

@@mickael486 Nothing is truly free. Someone will have to exchange something in order for you to access this technology, at least for a time. After many years it will be making no money because someone will have thought of something better. As that happens, this will have become more widely available to the world. Those with money get everything new for a time. When it is old, the rest will have it. I'm in my mid twenties and I believe that either my children or grandchildren will see free energy for the entire world in some form or another.

@@mickael486 it has to cost what they invest doing this possible, + all the technology employed on it... Chips cost for example because there's a whole process behind it, you know how difficult is to fabricate the transistors that maje your cellphone work??? No you don't your not an Electronic engineer... Well I know, and is not just about the wafers with the Extreme UV machines that are expensive by themselves, to achieve 5 nm 4nm technologies, but also all the process of etching, polishing, etc. The design that engineers have to make to achieve maximum use of the wafers, try to optimize power area and performance somehow because one improved makes the others worse... And even the resources taken from the Earth, because yes Si is everywhere, is sand, not difficult to get should be free, but you have many chemical components in the chips, Gold, Silver, Al, Ga, In, P, Sb, As, etc. Etc. For the dopants, for the connectors, for the BEOL FEOL layers, and every other components in the chip, capacitors, some resistors, the PCB itsel is another material, most of the modern cellphones are IP65 or IP67 of protection, so the same with their technology might have some conditions to gather the beam, is not easy, therefore is not free 😋.... If it was free the Engineers wouldn't have a job and all those years of Fourier transforms and Quantum mechanics that not everyone goes through would be in vain

We need to scale up progress in other areas too, that way we aren't simply waiting on this.

Exactly but the braindead slaves in the comments here just gobble all the propaganda up. The idea of filling our already polluted lower earth orbit with more satellites, ones the size of football fields, to then transform solar energy into microwave energy to then be beamed back to earth is absurd. Not to mention we would have to implement infrastructure and hardware to convert all those microwaves into electricity. Also, just because microwaves are non ionizing doesn't mean that they have no biological effects. For example our body has adapted and evolved around more powerful UVB rays that we use to produce vitamin D. Just because a 2.45ghz frequency is non ionizing doesnt mean it can have specific effects, such as dielectric heating with water molecules which is why this is used in microwave ovens. The idea of polluting our environment with a bunch of different frequencies of microwaves that were never naturally present on earth is very dangerous. Some animals and insects are even more sensitive to this than us humans.

As an Electrical engineer, this is all great in theory and not reality for mass market. This may be good for initial projects going to different planets, but its the dumbest idea in history to put this in space for all our power needs.

HEY! I LOVED IT and regular Sim City! SNES

Weight isn't really a factor when it comes to maintaining an orbit, as any object in orbit is going to be there pretty much indefinitely. In theory it will eventually run out of momentum, but there's so little up there that could slow it down that you're almost certainly not going to have to do anything more than occasionally adjust in order to remain in a geostationary position. The only thing that weight really affects significantly is how hard it is to achieve orbit and how easy it is to make adjustments when there. Maintenance would be a concern, but if the technology has minimal moving parts and doesn't degrade when exposed to those radiation levels it might not need much unless it gets hit by space debris, which is a very unlikely outcome.

@@casanovafunkenstein5090 Thank you! I understood! 👍

How much heat will it exert on the earth? If someone stands in the beam for an extended period of time, will their health be affected? These are the kinds of questions you should be asking.

And also how about the ground-based telescope? Isn't the carpet will obstruct the view from space ??

most likely there will be substations that receive the initial source of energy and than that will be distributed in other various styles to the current power grid. AC current is generated by spinning magnets. Right now we use gas engines to spin the magnets, we could use this beam as a way to power the spinning of magnets, and those magnets could run our current energy grid indefinitely

If its using microwave energy I'm more thinking of what it would do to clouds when these are scaled up

Why go through so much work to do this when we have a huge area called the Sierra desert? It is a massive area that has almost no cloud cover and receives more sunlight than any other place on earth. What I suggest is set up focus light energy generation plants along the coast of the Sierra desert that takes sea water and boils it to create steam, that steam turns turbines that make energy, the steam is then cooled by putting it into a distillery and turned into fresh water that then can be split into Hydrogen by the power produced by the turbines. The Hydrogen then can be shipped in containers containing Hydride by Hydrogen powered ships to anywhere on earth and be used to run vehicles and heat homes. This would create endless clean Hydrogen from the sun the advantage with this system is just like any fuel it can be stockpiled in abundance and used when ever it is needed unlike solar energy that is hard to store for a long period of time.

I'm wondering what it would do to the ozone layer at the higher levels they're talking about. It's not very difficult to separate O3.

​@@urgreatestenemy3044 Has anyone ever built a steam engine that runs on seawater before?

@mqb3gofjzkko7nzx38 Not sure about a steam engine running on saltwater. But I see no difference in running a terminal solar plant on sea water as saltwater will boil and create steam that would turn the turbines. I'm sure there would be issues with the brime water that is left after boiling, the longer you keep the water boiling the more salt would build up as when water boils away the salt would remain. Salt is also a little bit corrosive so you would probably have to use materials other than iron for moving the sea water around the plant but those are only minor problems that have to be accounted for.

Yeah free trip to space, free materials, free workers on ground and infrastructure.

Which is why it'll never happen, Oil and Gas will never allow it

@@TheCool_Guy23this is worse than oil and gas. Let’s put a (his words) “heat lamp” directly onto earth. Talk about global warming. Comments here oblivious to silent contributor to the drying out of the earth and all of its inhabitants… Electromagnetic Radiation.

People still believe our Freemason history, they were doing it, along with curing cancer and other ailments, before our time. It was all removed

Nope. This isn't a new thing. And it's completely unfeasible. At best it will be the next gen of CHI wireless phone chargers.

@@motosk8er2 It's not unfeasible if the ancients used it to power the cities here and off planet. There is only opposition to change and progress which we are all used to.

@@togowack Yes. It 100% is lmao. So your a crazy person then?

@@motosk8er2If it was feasible the amount of energy that would be in transmitted through the air is insane and unsafe. I don’t get how this stuff makes the news.

I agree but I suggest watching this video on space x energy transferring, across the sky , It’s a lot different from this or it may be exactly the same , but you can’t really see the energy beams during the day, but at night if you stare at the stars every night you can see it , I live I Texas and I see it a lot and my friends do too

But why should they lie? It very well could take 10+ years to create it at scale.

i watched the moon landing on a black-and-white cathode ray tube. i'm typing this comment on a 1cm-thick laptop with no moving parts. 20 years is not a long time.

Who says "Ten or twenty years." instead of "One or two decades." though?

as it is not ionizing then it wont damage cells and cause cancer. they did mention transmitting energy at lower levels than what you would receive from the sun. i think they said its sent through microwaves

We dont know dawg thats why they are learning about it ...

Ya, clouds would make this setup impractical.

It would cuck it for sure, but its prolly really low frequency anyways.

Thats fusion