abandoned by ubisoft? what is that a special treatment now? Dont they normally do that with literally every single game they own? damn.

I never thought that rainbow six extraction was a good idea in the first place! I have mixed feelings about remakes and remasters, but I would have preferred to get a remake of rainbow six vegas(campaign remake included too) instead of extraction. I never even played much of Siege because there is no campaign, Ubisoft needs to bring back single player campaigns to rainbow six. A remake of Vegas or bring back Patriots is what I want. I wonder too what is going on with splinter cell and is Ubisoft working on a ghost recon game? Do you know if Ubisoft is developing a new ghost recon game? I'd like Wildlands 2 or Future Soldier 2.

These developers are living in an ancint sequel mindset when they need to be creating a universe. Imagine subscribing to a Tom Clancy universe that gives you access to all the past and future games. Technically game passes offer this but if noone is enjoying most of the content its just netflix for videogames at that point.

Do you have a website where we can post ideas for future videos

Crisis needed to be permanent! More content! Not less!

I stopped buying their games a long time ago. Imo they are only slightly better. It seems the big wigs think they know what gamers want, without actually pressing this knowledge.

Amazing theyre still in business

Don't blame Ubisoft, blame Capitalism.

@@INFILTR8US Too broad a concept, tbh.... Blaming Ubisoft execs is easier for my small brain.

@@INFILTR8US Plenty of other capitalists around that arent fuckin up as much as Ubisoft

Its one big comedy

Since the success of Assassin’s Creed

I used to think it was a comedy, until the sexual abuse allegations were exposed.

One and a half.

Damn straight

HAHAHAHAHAA

Free rotary powah! Lol 😂

😂

Golden😂😂💀

Fucking mint comment man

Started out as one for an event back in 2018*.

It was at first. Extraction started out as a limited time mode called Outbreak that launched with Operation Chimera. Ubisoft spun it off into its own game a little while after that.

That’s all it should have ever been. Ubi got greedy as usual.

​@@blitzkrieg8776 didn't know Halloween was in March back in 2018

​@@borismuller86 freeeeennnccchhhhh!

Ahem... we all flocked to Ground Branch

@@AfroMan187 That game is far from being finished or being R6

​@@R0ndras yeah because we have hope for it. Unlike anything with the Tom Clancy name ever made.

as player from the first freeweekend in season 2 R6s I wish to go back yes....

You taking Vegas??

Assassins creed games keep selling like hotcakes tho. It is IMMENSILY profitable and a huge sucess. Even Valhala sold more than 20+ mi copies. Yall may not like it, but the normies eat them

@@quemsereu2009 I can be called a normie but I love all the main AC titles. I played all of them and my first one was AC in 2007. I pre-ordered Valhalla and beat it as fast as I could. We honestly don't get games like AC anymore. Every open world title now is a Souls-game and I'm so burnt out by dodge-based combat that is the focus of Souls-games.

Well most of the complaints are from grown men children who hate everything released even shit they ask for they complain bout everything an nothing at the same time, there are so many games, companies an ideas that can or can't make it into a game considering overhead and budgets most complain bout , buying anything when it comes out complaining about price points every year and half them that can't get the game immediately upon release are the biggest gripers there are more people that like any giving game than you will see complaints online seeing all those gives people a false sense of there opinions matter when they don't 😂 bunch of poor adults complaining about shit that ultimately does not matter it's the companies money if they fail not the individual idiots that complain like the are financing and publishing these games it's one big group of socially repressed adult retards who complain bout everything

​@@noobbotgaming2173 You don't find Valhalla falls into the same dodge-heavy combat loop as souls games does? It feels like I'm playing a gentrified version of The Witcher 3.

@@nousername2942 99% of attacks are parryable in Valhalla. The game encourages aggressive play because the parry windows are generous and perfect parrys are piss easy even on Hard. Only some bosses are unparryable for most of the fight.

Except the "aliens" take on Rainbow Six was actually amaazing. Unfortunately it still had too much of Siege on it, and Ubisoft tried to please the Siege fanboys to buy Extraction, which failed horribly. On top of that Ubisoft giving little support to Extraction, instead of appealing to its own fanbase and newcomers (NON-Siege players) killed the future of the game.

I honestly think Siege is perfectly fine, it’s nowhere near as tactical as Rainbow Six was traditionally but it’s still one of the more tactical and lethal multiplayer shooters. I just wish Siege didn’t BECOME Rainbow Six and that they continued to release traditional Rainbow Six games.

Siege is thriving so I wouldn’t necessarily say they destroyed it

I think Siege is a good multiplayer adaptation of rainbow six. But I agree single player or PvE should’ve stuck with a more grounded approach than extraction. Should’ve used this weird stuff for special events within siege or maybe even within a proper rainbow six co op game

​@@YogiTheBearMan Extraction is a more realized version of the Outbreak event that was introduced in Siege. Extraction is much bigger and more complex than that event as well, so it couldn't have made it as a DLC event.

To be fair it’s technically not full price it’s 39.99 but I don’t disagree with your statement.

@@eradicatedpulse6896 Oh shit, I could've sworn they initially sold it for $60. Nevermind, must be misremembering that.

Plus the event was done so much better. The infected were scarier, the maps actually looked overrun with an alien infection rather than just...some evil mold, and the special infected were much better.

I would have preferred a Rainbow is Magic game, tbh.

and that event was s h i t

No. They sell trash and you buy trash. They put the lowest effort and people still buy their trash. All they can do is break the bottom of the barrel and just keep going downwards. If ubi could sell young boys as prostitutes in their games, they would.

What identity tho? As far as I can remember this company never really had a solid "identity", they always had random IPs that they inevitably milked to death. Their most defining "identity" now is how cringy and woke they became and how samey their games are.

Yea this is the only channel I have notifications on

Correct.

They do consistent and high quality work. And 99% of the videos are MUST watch.

@@miltbottleboy *must.

Can't believe this channel doesn't have 1mil yet

Siege was a lot like Raven Shield Multiplayer until they removed everything smart and turned it into another special move shooter

Or how they used to have the AI react different and be at other locations, so you thought you knew where to expect them, planned it cause that mother lover was in that room and killed you....now you were gonna jump his ass, you got it all figured out, made your way to that room again, set your guys up, flash it, barge in, you were gonna shoot the mother ducker yourself.......empty room....then behind bambambam.....goshdiggely darn that mother lucker got you again!

Loved rogue spear. Planning the missions was the best part. Assigning go commands as well.

You mean when Rainbow Six used to be Rainbow Six and not Overwatch?

Remember when Rainbow Six used to be a realistic tactical shooter?

Lol 😆 FREEENNNCCCHHHHH!

@@mr.kwamid-86_43 Oh yeah, the french. Like the french of EA right? Oh wait.... its as if that has nothing to do with nationality.

Well Consumers keep consuming it

@@CoercedJab Yep, we have no one to blame for it but ourselves.

​​@@CoercedJabnot true. Extraction is dead, The Division diying, Watch Dogs Legion unfortunately flop the same as Fenyx Rising (actual good game), and Ghost Recon Frontlines was cancelled after the first Beta. And lets no forget about Roller Champions, an interesting sports game but no one knows about it. No, Ubi is not doing well in the numbers and with customers. They're burning money.

​@@r.daneel.90 well Xdefiant looks promising.

@@gamingjunkie707 No.

That's more of a Matt McMuscles topic. We just have to wait..

agreed

@@AUM_-po9sc matt is dope but i really don't like the way he explains game "history.." He's the man though

These videos feel less and less like a “deep dive” and more and more like an ad friendly Wikipedia synopsis 😂

@@CoercedJab Ah so youre just going around comments being an idiot to all?

It definitely had potential as a stand-alone game if it was an actual game and not just a mode they made people pay for.

It had plenty of potential, the problem is they didn't realize any of that potential.

@@eradicatedpulse6896 So then it didn't have a potential

Yeah it was nice to have a pve co-op shooter, but it definitely shouldn't have been an r6 game.

it still is fun

I wouldn't mind it having the R6 name if it had some more R6 elements. I like Siege's world and characters, and honestly I wish it was tied into Siege more (gameplay wise), like levels, skins, etc. The feel of extraction is kinda nice compared to Siege.

Says you, Siege snob.

Rise and fall of the pIandemic

Double it and give it to the next person

Splinter cell never really fell, per se. There just hasnt been another in over a decade.

@@Severekillshot Blacklist underperformed in terms of sales though, so in a way the series has fallen. Back in its heyday Splinter Cell was the flagship franchise of Ubisoft, and now it's just something they sporadically reference in other games. Maybe the remake will bring the series back to life, though personally I don't have high expectations for it.

@@GrinningMoth It underperformed but it was much more of a return to form for the series than Conviction was. Shame they haven't tried making another, but I don't even trust modern Ubisoft enough to not screw it up tbh

@@wlot28 Oh yeah, it certainly was a better game than Conviction. And yes, it's probably for the best that a new Splinter Cell hasn't come out because Ubisoft would probably fuck it up.

The strangest thing I saw in a Tom Clancy game was the brain conservation in Splinter Cell Pandora Tomorrow

Why not? The blackest of ops literally involve the “alien file”

I disagree. A sci-fi adaptation in a Tom Clancy universe could work... but it has to be a Tom Clancy game. Not this. I can totally see a proper Tom Clancy Sci-Fi game working out and being a cool game... but Extraction ain't it.

Eh , they could do an espionage game that digs deeper and deeper into the World Government’s involvement with aliens and their technology with the end SOMEWHAT showing the alien, because let’s be honest , alien designs have all pretty much been done (They’re either bipedal and hairless if they’re intelligent or quadrupedal if they’re aggressive and dumb, still hairless). Plus the vagueness leaves a lot to mind and let’s fans come up with their own ideas and designs. For instance, not showing the aliens in Transformers whatever it’s called where Mark Walhberg is a knight or something, the movie shows only an alien hand but that’s all the movie did right

They need to stop using the Tom Clancy name on their games already. Ubisoft hasn't deserved the Tom Clancy name for 10 years now.

If anything we were just asking for a return of the event

Yeah it was a fun event and should have stayed as a Halloween seasonal thing, nothing more. They could have tied playing it to some Halloween skins or something to make money from it and no one would complain

Target audience was COD: Ghosts players

It boggles the mind as much as Rage 2.

I and many others asked for it.

They already did Alice Madness Returns, if I´m not mistaken.

@@claireredfield7368 need update or redux or something

Same. I miss the Tom Clancy campaigns. Ghost Recon: Future Soldier was the last one I genuinely enjoyed

Exactly. If they had made unique enemies that require unique solutions akin to the SCP universe (each season bringing in new creatures), made it 4-5 players rather than three, and emphasized a Left 4 Dead approach (maybe random moral dilemmas per map like saving a hostage/curing the virus/letting bomb go off in civilian population/etc)....you probably would've gotten a fantastic survival horror shooter.

Then Extraction should be a game carry SCP title and it would be worthy SCP game after the Containment Breach with more tactics. It ain't make sense to carry Rainbow Six title with it

Correction: Its now the the M-SHE-U. Just like Lucasfilm Disney are a bunch of 🤡🤡

You are lost if you really play this game 😅

@@BlockFEED Whatever. Had a good time with Crossplay with my Xbox friends.

@@BlockFEED Key word is "free".

"free"... as long a you pay for the battlepass.

Eventually die

it wanst live service at all, since i never had any kind of battlepass, and u could get the store points for free after finishing a weekly maelstrom protocol, it was one of the more player budget friendly games of 2022 if u already had gamepass.

@@abrahamalviarez5870 A live service game relies exclusively on maintaining a strong player count and the developers introducing new content on a regular basis to keep players interested, while relying on private servers for online only play. Hence the term 'live service'. I dont really care for them myself since if you buy the game there's no great guarantee you'll still be able to play it a few years or sometimes even just months down the line when it loses popularity and the servers eventually get shut down.

@@Fatman311 it happens with most multiplayers after all, I remember enjoying playing crysis 2 multiplayer everyday after school and it got shut down after some years

I sleep to this all the time 😂

no... but *Rainbow 6* extraction is bad. just like *Ghost Recon* breakpoint. the division was already pushing it with the "face tank all the bullets" enemies(and shotgun snipers)

​@@caliginousmoira8565 DEEEEEPPPP

You played it for 100 hours. You couldn't have been that disappointed at the time.

@@vinhill1456 I played it under the foolish assumption that it would get more content and support. Also I had friends to play with distracting me from how awful it was.

Doesn’t sound like you were very disappointed lmfao

Firstly I don't see the point in these 2 comments but I shall still waste my time explaining such simple things to such dense people such as yourselves. 1. I played with friends which as any person knows can make even the worst of times far better than on your own. 2. I played under the foolish assumption that the game would get proper long term support and have far more content added to it. 3. I wasn't in the best of mental headspaces meaning a game where I could escape into was an easy path to take. Please next time when you comment actually do so with a reason rather than this pointless "Well you spent what I perceive as a long amount of time on it so it can't have been that bad" many idiots seem to say.

​@@yellowskrub well you said you played it like it would get more support, which to me means you had a lot of hope for the game, you also said that you only played with friends which is nice, but I like playing with randos for the challenge, which makes it quite fun.

Hunt: Showdown is awesome🤘

The ignorance of this comment is stunning

@@RejectedRecords1998 Can you explain in case people miss it?

It looks like yet another goofy hero shooter plastered with macrotransactions. I wouldn't be surprised servers will go dark within year just like that other f2p shooter they are sunsetting this month.

the game looks absolutely beautiful and plays very well with good team coordination. I hope some day that maybe ubi will do some sorta update to extraction if player numbers raise, assuming they dont shut down the servers before then

Lol. That's funny

" then buy them. More would get made. It's very, very simple." We do. But they are barely getting made at all. That's the problem. The reason Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six, and Tom Clancy names are popular as game franchises and were loved is BECAUSE they started out as realistic tactical games. I think the concept of Extraction as a game would have been fine and recieved better IF and ONLY if: - Rainbow Six had other proper titles being introduced outside of Seige. Proper tactical Rainbow Six games. But getting Seige... and then a f*cking coop alien shooter after the Rainbow Six franchise was starving for a proper R6 game for YEARS was a terrible decision. And not just R6, but Ghost Recon and Splinter Cell as well. - Other Tom Clancy titles weren't Far Cry clones. - It wasn't a Seige asset flip. - Didn't use the Rainbow Six name and was branded as something else or new IP entirely. People associate R6 with tactical and shooter. Not sci-fi and aliens. Ubisoft has CONSTANTLY been shitting on it's classic IPs for over a decade and this is why people get upset. Becuase shit like a sci-fi coop shooter gets made when we don't even have proper main titles for them to satisfy the main core audience. Extraction's failure was due to out-of-touch people who decided such a game was the right direction to take for the next Rainbow Six title.

@@BlindxSide As a collective, more people are buying the newer stuff over the older stuff. So with all due respect, the above isn't true at all. People are shitting on Assassins, then buy Valhalla in record numbers, people say Siege is a joke compared to Vegas and not true to Rainbow and then Siege sells 8x more. People say FARCRY6 is cartoonishly bad, it sells 5x more than Farcry 2, the referenced peak by fans. I can go on and on. So no, you don't vote with your wallets. You buy games in record numbers that are wacky then ignore the straight military Clancy games like Ghost Recon. You're in the vocal minority of what gamers actually want. You might be in the echo-chamber of thinking that "EVERYONE wants X" but you're not buying it as a collective. Devs even want to make the older style stuff, games get pitched ALL THE TIME that are realistic in nature but they're ultimately turned down for less realistic ventures simply because we see the numbers and gamers are voting loud and clear about the types of games they actually want. I respect that you personally have preferences, I share them; but you're not the majority, not even close.

That's just as much Ubisoft's fault, as they placed their diversity policies over having competent, passionate Devs.