Thanks for setting of my echo at the end

It keeps telling me to download the app but the google play store says the app isn't available in my country

This video is clearly fake, no way can somebody crack a handshake that fast, even wep took longer ..........

@@DJIInLondon na aircrack is pretty good

Or "Joe Lycett performs a public service - in an entertaining way".

Hugo Boss 😂

Odd way to spell "private investigation." And "Lycett."

Good. I genuinely don't care about the safety of Amazon execs. xD Their offices ought to be sloppily insulated with ragged asbestos.

@@georgerogers2120 pretty sure Amazon executives aren't the only people working in that building, nice to know you have such disdain for some people's existence. Executives or not I don't agree with wishing death on people.

yeah but you was stupid enough to believe using a default password is a hack...... Not sure the 2iq you rock is up to scratch.

I assume they have an X-ray but watches aren’t going to flag up

@@georgerogers2120 I worked in that building. It's mostly R&D workers; programmers, designers, etc, many of whom don't have anything to do with the retail website (Amazon is comprised of many different sub-companies, not just retail). Most execs aren't even in the UK, it's an American company.

So did mine!!

Mine heard it as 'Songs to cry yourself to sleep'

Its probably scripted

Same but mine started to play Asian music 😂😂😂

Same!!!

More than one blinks, but it's the one near Joe in the cropped-shots that's the creepiest!

The simple trick is to unplug kettle cord from controller-box on wall-socket, unplug the box, then plug cord straight into wall-socket! Shhimple!!!

@@stevie-ray2020 As if he knew or had anyway to know that the kettle was connected to a smart plug, and that that smart plug was being hacked..... 🤨

I second this (e)motion.

even he isn’t that powerful

They do pay good tho

@ilikebacon I don't work there but some people don't have the option to leave bad workforces homie i-

@ilikebacon not engaging with a troll who can't grasp smth children can understand bestie bye

Same

You know they spy on you through those devices right?

@@enoch13th85 any peer reviewed sources on that or are you just spouting shit hoping for a spar?

@@fawkyou2001 They can spy on you through your phone when it's not even turned on and you doubt they could do it through personal assistants? Don't know why you feel the need to be rude but OK.

@@enoch13th85 Don't worry; only you're important enough to be spied upon.

Cameron Ware He changed his name back

Joseph Fawcett yeah, get with it, Cameron

Cameron Ware hugo Boss forever Cameron

Are you under the impression you’re the first person to make that joke?

Genuinely just laughed out loud

I really didn’t need to know about the consistency or regularity of your bowel movements. Please refrain from this in the future. I feel rather ill now.

They probably won't know that smart devices with voice control, can be controlled using infrared lights from fairly long distances outside the home through windows.

@@GrumpyGrebo yes, but to do that you need a very powerful laser, a laptop and a setup that would be so clearly visible that it'd be ridiculous even considering it for breaking in. We've watched the same video, and it appears that you haven't listened properly.

Samuel Rowan Well - a lot of them are. I mean if you want to pay over the odds for a smart plug or smart lightbulb which changes colour because you can’t be bothered to get up and flick a switch then be my guest. But the risk is always going to be there no matter what

@@GrumpyGrebo That requires someone to be very specifically targeted. Very unlikely for an average person.

@@klanny22 Obviously there is a risk. There is a risk in most everything you do.

We always go for the easiest option us hackers :-)

Exactly the point being made here.......

@@MrBojax Calling yourself a hacker for getting into tech devices by using the default password is the same as calling yourself a master lock pick by using the key to open a lock.

@@mrman991 Hahaha, no it really isn't. But it's just a bit of fun, and then there is you. ThAt'S NoT HackInG!

The problem is that most people don't understand that their devices can be made secure and will just see it as technology = bad.

King of Hack

Who??

Its Joe again.

he changed it back to Joe Lycett

Honestly dont find his jokes funny. Knew thered be a weak/easy penetration joke. I like taking down the scammers though.

@@ruqayyahqadri6618 If you like scammers being taken down, Jim Browning's YT channel is highly satisfying.

Tbh I’d enjoy the song it would be a nice change from the normal boring day.

True however when your working for a company sending out faulty children watches that can be easily hacked I think you would want to know or they deserve to know.

Fuck now it’s playing Happy Birthday by Stevie Wonder

God forbid parents want to know their kid hasn't been kidnapped on their way to school

@@k7450 You're totally right, how did parents for thousands of years do it? Besides if you're going to kidnap a child, wouldn't you take the GPS watch and phones of them before you take them away? Seems a little silly to advertise to everyone that you're kidnapping a child.

@@k7450 give your kid a phone or something instead. also it's also handy tech for abusive or controlling parents

@@k7450 it's just weird. Nothing more to say about it.

@@arianrhodhyde7482 about 20 years ago, two girls who lived opposite me were kidnapped walking to school, they were raped and beaten and no one knew where they were. There are thousands and thousands of parents who have had their children kidnapped and would have a completely different outcome if their kids were wearing a watch with a tracker in. I'm not talking about 20 year olds being checked up on by their parents, I'm talking about kids, because guess what kids get taken and are rarely found. Abusive and controlling parents will make their kids lives miserable with a phone too, or any other way they can think of whether this watch exists or not, so that point is irrelevant.

Oh no! Someone was listening to songs on your Spotify, what ever could you do?

@@adambutterworth7608 Pretty sure, if a card is linked they could use that to order stuff to PO Boxes,etc (unless the bank is understandable and would refund the money)

i see this is 2 year old comment but you do know you can log in to the router on any device and see what is connected to it just type in router login with the name of it like BT or virgin and you log into it and see all what goes in and out of the router and connected devices so so can tell if someone is connected to it.

@@SwitchTvAr Agreed - a long password would have stopped me getting in.

@@robshapland1186 Surely you already knew the password and had it in your wordlist. No chance a random brute force can be done that quickly against a router.

@@thecryptobot Yeah, not a chance someone could break into a router via Wi-Fi that quickly via bruteforce unless the password is 12345 or password

@@AIC69420 For sure. I was watching it like "riiiiiight" Wasn't impressed with the rest of the video because of it haha. Everything else would have been super easy if he's already pwned the network. He'd still be sat outside trying to crack it if he only had that laptop 😂

@@thecryptobot default password

Also don't buy anything on Amazon! While I buy plenty of stuff online, for me it's a matter of principle that I've never used Amazon, & I never will!

@@stevie-ray2020 each to their own

No, it's actually just actively updating devices, activating 2FA on accounts, having seperate VLANs for devices and making sure that passwords are secure.

@@AIC69420 No device is truly safe, anything can be compromised, end of story.

@@QuickBits That is untrue, if you have a proper secure network then is PHYSICALLY AND VIRTUALLY cannot be hacked ( for eg my network) obviously cheap ISP routers don't give much security but if you use your own for e.g pfsense, cisco, etc and have it configured properly then it can't be hacked

I was like, “Stop stop stop stop stop!”

That's why I wore a hoodie :-)

@@robshapland1186 LOL nobody would believe you're good at computers otherwise ;) Since you're here, can I ask if you just used aircrack-ng on the router and then cracked the hash brute force?

@@catheriner999 I think I used Wifite in the end, but yes - just captured the handshake and brute forced it from there.

@@robshapland1186 Thanks for replying, I was wondering if you had any fancy private tools. It's really shocking how long this exploit has been around and that it still can be used so easily. But it's also pretty easy to secure against w/ a long random password just to make the crack time unfeasible for the casual neighbour/wardriver/tv show in a van. More worrying is the IOT with manufacturer flaws that the consumer cannot fix. Anyway hope you had a good experience on the show, love that Joe has put his trolling skills to public good, like a real white hat.

yes, but to do that you need a very powerful laser, a laptop and a setup that would be so clearly visible that it'd be ridiculous even considering it for breaking in. We've watched the same video, and it appears that you haven't listened properly.

​Using similar principles to the fabled "BadBIOS" airgap attacks, you certainly do NOT need a massive laser or a van which says "Flowers By Irene" on the side haha. Max, we do not watch the same cartoons.

@@GrumpyGrebo in the study by Takeshi Sugawara, they used a 60 milliwatt laser, and this was without any obstructions, using near perfect conditions. Assuming real life break-in conditions, you have glass, curtains, plants and maybe even a whole Bush in your way, making the hacking of smart-devices using this method near impossible unless you have a big ass laser. In real life, you'd need one of two types of lasers: either a really powerful one to flood the entire device with light in order to trigger the microphone, or a less powerful one, in which case you have to angle the laser just right. You can only use this method of attack if you have direct line of sight and if the device is angled correctly. If, like the google nest, the microphone is located at the back, you're fucked. This method of hijacking smart devices is really impractical and obvious, especially since there are so many easier methods. This also renders using any other light source for hacking useless since its still really obvious and impractical. Sitting around for hours until a smart device is hacked? A normal robbery takes, at most (from arrival to fleeing) 15 minutes. Sitting there for hours on end is extremely suspicious and your cover can easily be blown.

@@GrumpyGrebo it also needs to be pointed right at the mic as well... Who are you worried about lmao. If people are going to this much effort to break in then I don't think they are robbing you

@@maxz8807Like I say, we obviously are not watching the same cartoons. 5mW infrared lasers cost ~10 GBP. You do need a large lens to focus over distance, but this is not such a futuristic unobtainable component. Line of sight is obviously required, in many urban environments this is not a restrictive factor. Easier methods yield appropriate results. Crime is rapidly shifting into smart tech space. SImilar to identity theft, spear phishing, other cyber crime attacks... it doesn't take much at all to fingerprint somebody and establish customised attack vectors targeting an individual person.

If they dont play watchdogs they dont see how bad the future looks 😂

@@amac5055 Watch Dogs is about a universe of smart cities where everything is controlled by one main operating system which if someone accesses, they can control *everything* around them until they are kicked out of the system. Everyone with a brain can see how bad of an idea that is and I really don't think the future'll be like Watch Dogs...

good eye

AND he has two different phones!

Heartbreaking.. Luurve Cath Kidson

I've seen a guy who hacked Alexa for his own convenience. It turns out Alexa doesn't parse what you said, it records you and sends the recordings over the internet to bigger computers who figure out what you said and send commands back. So he has his computer able to send recordings to Alexa's HQ directly. For example, Alexa will say anything you ask it to say, like "Alexa, say good morning." He has a recording of him saying that, and his computer sends it automatically when his phone logs on to the wifi in his home office. So he enters the office and Alexa says "Good morning". So if you can copy how the Alexa tells HQ which Alexa it is, you can send anything you want to HQ and it will think somebody said it to that Alexa.

Call their customer helpline