I did my homework on this and found out that the original Telefunken U-47 cost €100 when it was first released. I'm NOT kidding!!

Great video. Thanks for the information. Very helpful.

Wa-47 is awesome bro!! I want the wa-47 and the wa 8000 :") I hope that you can share that videos, That will be so great!

Enjoy guys 😊

A nice review looking at the WA-47 and very helpful to me for hearing some things before making a decision amongst Warm Audio's large diaphragm condenser mics for a specific application. The power supply and the cable are extremely important to the stability of the circuitry of the microphone. The cable is really about two things. First, the isolation of the audio signal from the power lines running in parallel to it plus the rejection of nearby electrical and electromagnetic noise. Especially for studio work. Really low noise high isolation balanced audio line is not inexpensive although it doesn't need to be the way over-hyped consumer marketed stuff that is sold to those whose deposit accounts are held by Fort Knox. Canare quad is an outstanding example of really good studio grade audio cable. It is not inexpensive but it also does not have a Fort Knox price point. There is another equally good audio cable I'd use although Canare quad is what I use when I make my cables. A nearly 100% coverage braided shield preferably with a conductive rubber layer to eliminate flex noise is not inexpensive to produce. Quad signal conductors inside would be ideal, but a single twisted pair will be adequate to get to the power supply. Hopefully, the power supply is running really well filtered DC including the tube heaters (filaments) which is not truly necessary in some applications such as table radios, but is truly necessary in a tube mic. Any AC ripple on the heater supply will, because it is a high current supply, will bleed into the audio line adjacent to it no matter how well shielded it is. Zero noise is too much to ask with even the highest quality solid state rectifiers and filter capacitors in the tube supply. There is always semiconductor junction, capacitor, and resistor noise. The better the audio cable, the better the end result. Second, the gauge of the copper power conductors in the cable make a huge difference in the voltage stability of the circuitry in the microphone. Cheap cables use minuscule conductors. The tube requires a relatively high current for the heaters (filaments). A tiny gauge creates a resistance in the cable that creates a voltage drop between power supply and the vacuum tube. Not good for having the tube operate according to specification. A tiny gauge in the high voltage supply also creates a resistance in the cable that creates a voltage drop between the power supply and the vacuum tube. For the high voltage to be stable in the tube, the gauge needs to be large enough gauge (a lower number) to make the cable resistance nil compared to the tube resistance. Otherwise, the tube voltage will vary as the conductivity of the tube varies during signal amplification. The variation will correspond exactly to the signal amplitude. This is not good for linear amplification of the really tiny signal the tube is amplifying -- the amplification will be non-linear. There is a budget C-12 clone that comes with an insanely poor power supply and cable. I have one. It has good internal parts in the mic circuit board. It needs, and I built one, a far better power supply. It also needs a different and much higher quality cable -- I bought one for slightly less than $80 made by a well-known and reputable maker. The price point is obviously reached by including a total junk power supply and cable with it. I may put Neutrik ends on the mic/power cable at some point. Simply replacing the power supply and cable with a really high quality one improves that microphone enormously and is immediately noticeable to an audio engineer. A dramatic improvement. I will probably replace the capsule with a much improved C-12 style capsule, but that improvement, whilst important, is nowhere near as dramatic as changing the power supply and cable. My take on this is that whilst it may seem some hype for Warm Audio to tout the cable, it is a very good one and it is worth noting considering the really bad total junk cables and power supplies that are sold with budget oriented tube microphones. It is worth noting that Warm Audio did not sacrifice this part of the microphone build for getting to a good price point.

Nice video Harv. On a separate note, what are you using for audio?? It sounds soo good honesty

Thanks. Would have been interesting to hear your compressed/EQed vocal as well.

It does sound nice straight away

this have its own power supply right? do i still need to use 48 phantom power in my pre amp or audio interface? please reply thank you!

I own a Groove Tubes GT 55 mic, and Audient ID 14 interface. I'm thinking of getting a better sounding mic. Should I get a new mic or new preamp?

How does the WA-47 compare compare to a $60 microphone?

Good work man, but consider using a de-esser for your narration.

Hahahaha There was some funny shit in this. I think it's a bit boomy. I think I'm gonna get a Warm Audio 87. Thanks good info

47 sounds better, the highs are pokey and sibilant on the 184 in a bad way to my ears. works great for certain things of course, I think Cannons uses one or a 185 or 183 for their vox. Very specific hifi sound.

nah man don't get all " I know I know" when describing the capture, the other day I described my buddy's voice on the mic as "spreading butter" so...

where do you have the wa47 placed on the acoustic guitar? it sounds great!

JIM LILL THE BEST

Wanted to subscribe but my finger is hurting

Had this mic, was bad, was taking eq adjustments badly, tried to put the best tube possible and made no difference. It was good for classical guitar though in omni mode positioned close to the strings but even in this case it had an almost inaudible distortion resonating on the low freq. Sold this mic, stay away from it, at this price you can buy better ones.