U should not be saying that. He’s a good pastor. Try read the fruits of the Spirit

No he hasn’t

He no longer beloeves in the inerrancy of scripture. That means he can fall for anything. He is lost.@@martinhoy1

I could see this 25 years ago

Please informed many people in that situation and someone that is not. May the LORD be with you always. Praise be to JESUS. That he shook you 👆

@@tierrafoster9975 I sure will as the Holy Spirit leads.

That must’ve been horrible. Can’t even image how bad, but how gracious of God to allow you to go through it! It saved you and will help many others by hearing it. Thank you for sharing.

I don't believe this for a minute.

@@inYTbio_SiteLINKs2Verses_Bruvplease believe. It’s truth.

THE APPLE DOES NOT FALL FAR FROM THE TREE, CHARLES WAS JUST BETTER AT HIDING HIS BLASPHEMIES

@@patrickgragg5602 You don't know what you're talking about.

@@patrickgragg5602You are making a false statement! 🤮

True Biblical love is to tell others they are sinning against GOD -- Leviticus 19:17-18 -- to allow them to continue in their sin/abomination against GOD is to be UN-loving like Satan.

@@veritasmuy2407 Amen! It was also Satan who cast doubt on the Word of God even though it was clear. Stanley does the same thing. I just hope the people at his church read their Bible. 📖

@@veritasmuy2407 it is fantastic to see Christians truly speak according to the word of God. It's not a hateful thing, it is truly being filled w the Spirit and love. The one who loves The Father loves others. The one who loves is born of God and obeys His commandments!

I had a homosexual "christian" tell me that Sodom/Gomorrah was GOD destroying those cities because they were "unfriendly to strangers". Honestly, there is no end to the biblical gymnastics that homosexuals will do to justify living in sin......

This video is to help people who might be swayed by false teaching. If I was speaking directly to Andy Stanley my approach and my emotions would be very different, as it is with people who are in sin. But if I was worked up about every issue of sin or false teaching happening around the world... I would obviously be a very overly morose person.

@@dailygospelgcc but really..lorrainethomas has a good point. There are dozens of videos of people talking just like you. lots of words and explanations but the issue is so simple. These satanic false teachers are deceiving millions. Just call a spade a spade.

A lot of PKs are very rebellious.

Andy Stanley used to preach the Bible. He has really drifted through the years, though.

Sorry but I live in Atlanta. I don’t question CS’s salvation but he hurt a lot of people and was accountable to no one. Plus the way he treated his wife was unconscionable. There’s more but I’ll leave it at that.

Charles Stanley Never spoke out about his Son’s bad doctrine. He treated his wife horrible.

@@carolbarlow8896 It would be clarifying if you told those of us that don't live in Atlanta exactly how Charles "hurt" a lot of people and how he treated his wife "horribly". Maybe that would explain the beginning of the end for Andy.....

@@cfitzgerald.174 A false witness is just as much an abomination to God as homosexuality.

@@veritasmuy2407 This is probably more than you want to hear but here goes. First, the deacons were never voted on by the church. They were hand picked, hired and fired at will by CS. If you disagreed with him or even questioned him on anything you would be thanked for your service and dismissed. He was accountable to no one. The same held true for employees who lived in fear of losing their jobs because firing people was no big thing to CS. CS ran FBA with an iron rod. Churches all over Atlanta are littered with former FBA members and employees who left with scars. To be clear we are talking about hundreds and hundreds of people. Not just a few disgruntled families. In addition to his church duties CS was also a distributor for Amway. A corporate connection to a pastor is always a bad idea especially if the business is in sales. This held true for CS as well. Give yourself a minute to think about the financial conflict of interest of members being under Stanley to sell Amway. (He did quit the Amway gig later in life.) His public refusal to be married to his wife rather than his job and his camera was terrible for Anna. Put yourself in her shoes. Respected ministers everywhere were publicly calling on him to focus on his marriage and he said no. In the early 90s when ugly things about her being mentally ill (not true) started coming out in the press he never once stood up for her. He never once told Baptist press to stop publishing stories about his wife. (And where did those stories come from? Just asking. 🤔) As you know, Andy has gone off the rails but I’ll give him credit for this. He sided with his mother in the divorce. If you think you can get Luther Rice Seminary to divulge the specifics of CS’s alleged doctorate good luck. They never have. What did he have to do to get his doctorate? Seminaries don’t hide this stuff. It’s odd. Also, the demand to be addressed as Dr. Stanley says something other than humility. How he finagled himself into the pastorate of FBA in the first place was not how good men do it. Was CS the source of all evil? No. Could he give a decent sermon? Sure. Did he know how to schmooze a crowd? No doubt. Did he love God’s word? Probably. Did he help a lot of people? To his credit, yes. Are you and I as deeply flawed as he was? If we’re honest about our own sin - probably yes. But the rosy tinted shades need to come off.

Then Jacob said to Laban, “Give me my wife, for my days are fulfilled, that I may go in to her.” 22 And Laban gathered together all the men of the place and made a feast. 23 Now it came to pass in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter and brought her to Jacob; and he went in to her. 24 And Laban gave his maid Zilpah to his daughter Leah as a maid. 25 So it came to pass in the morning, that behold, it was Leah. And he said to Laban, “What is this you have done to me? Was it not for Rachel that I served you? Why then have you deceived me?” 26 And Laban said, “It must not be done so in our country, to give the younger before the firstborn. 27 Fulfill her week, and we will give you this one also for the service which you will serve with me still another seven years.” 28 Then Jacob did so and fulfilled her week. So he gave him his daughter Rachel as wife also. 29 And Laban gave his maid Bilhah to his daughter Rachel as a maid. 30 Then Jacob also went in to Rachel, and he also loved Rachel more than Leah. And he served with Laban still another seven years.

He absolutely is.

Andy supports gay marriage n lesbianism n such is against the Word of God!!! His father, the late Rev Charles Stanley was truly a servant of God and he always preaches the truth from the Bible🙏🙏🙏 pray for Andy

@@coreygardner59 No, Andy is not a Christian (Matthew 7:15-23) -- he is teaching what GOD calls evil, as "good" and acceptable. *Apostle Paul clearly shows in 1Coriinth 3 that Andy is on his way to Hell because Andy's teachings are corrupting/destroying the people/temples of GOD.* GOD so despises homosexuality, that GOD uses homosexuality as a CURSE against those fake ass Christians that blaspheme GOD -- see ROMANS 1:25-28 -- now you know why the Roman hierarchy suffers from rampant homosexuality for teaching the heresy that the female creature Mary has the same glorious attributes as GOD/Messiah (sinless, immaculately conceived, leader to Christ, crusher of Satan, giver of grace, mediator, redeemer, protector, etc)

It is a Rode PodMic!

@@dailygospelgcc thank you 👍🏼

How is homosexuality destroying our nation?

Yes, Charles Stanley preached many times on the subject! Of course he was against the LGBT issues and stood strongly for traditional marriage.

@@Lcash218 YOU: stood strongly for traditional marriage. *ME: Then why did Charles get a divorce if he believed strongly in marriage ??*

@@veritasmuy2407 If you bothered to find out the truth instead of listening to rumors, Charles fought for over 10 years to stop his wife from filing for divorce. Ultimately he failed to persuade her to not file. As a result, he tendered his resignation as Pastor of First Baptist of Atlanta but the Board of Deacons refused the resignation. Charles did the Biblical thing and remained single for the rest of his natural life.

Yes, he did. Charles Stanley was a leader in the conservative resurgence in the Southern Baptist Convention.

Yes I think you may be right. He may have been battling homosexual tendencies since he was young. He seems to be so defensive of this subject and focuses his heresies on this subject intensely.

I’m no dispensational, but not sure how you can equate it with cheap grace or the rise of the nazis. Just read a John MacArthur book 😁

I think the fact that the salaries of the pastors of German churches came from the government had something to do with their support. Everybody was desperate to survive after the Weimar Republic hyperinflationary period. Hitler promised them jobs and delivered with the war machine he was building.

@@dailygospelgcc Unfortunately, Martin Luther turned against the Jews when they failed to convert, famously calling for the synagogues to be burned, and Hitler used that to gain support of the Lutheran churches over there.

About what exactly?

1 Corinthians 5:1-13 (NIV) 1 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that even pagans do not tolerate: A man is sleeping with his father’s wife. 2 And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have gone into mourning and have put out of your fellowship the man who has been doing this? 3 For my part, even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. As one who is present with you in this way, I have already passed judgment in the name of our Lord Jesus on the one who has been doing this. 4 So when you are assembled and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, 5 hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord. 6 Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? 7 Get rid of the old yeast, so that you may be a new unleavened batch--as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. 8 Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people-- 10 not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11 But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people. 12 What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13 God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked person from among you.”

God didn't warm Sodom and Gomorah of you believe in that account. As Jesus said as in the days of Lot. It will happen again this is the warning and witnessing that people need. Then leave it up to them. Do not preach compromising.

We should be truthful about all sin, don’t you agree? Just because one person might minimize a certain sin doesn’t give us justification to minimize another. Believe me if Andy was saying that sex outside of marriage or no-fault divorce was fine, we’d be making the same video. But most compromise in churches right now seems to center on the recent changing standards around homosexuality. And if you’re interested in our views on divorce, sex outside of marriage and hypocrisy in leadership we have videos on all of those sins and more 😁

YOU: They pounce on homosexuals. Yet i have been a member of churches with divorced deacons and with the third husband or wife and not a word that according to the harsh words of Jesus, they are living in sin. *ME: Satan has already gotten the Church to accept adultery/divorce -- began in the 50-60's, and now the adultery/divorce rate in the church is higher than in the evil world.* THAT is Satan's ploy, to S L O W L Y get the church to change from within -- first attack: adultery/divorce -- now, accept homosexuality. *Just because Satan has managed the Church to accept one sin, does NOT mean that we should continue on this downhill path and start accepting every sin.* *Despite Satan's wiles, the true Christian understands that homosexuality is an abomination/abhorrence to GOD* -- Leviticus 18:22, Lev 20:13, Deut 22:5, etc -- *GOD so completely despises homosexuality, that GOD uses it as a curse for those that blaspheme GOD -- Romans 1:25-28.* Soooo.... YOU are saying that because the church was stupid or corrupt enough to accept adultery/divorce, that now we should invite openly active homosexuals into the congregation and join them in worshiping GOD ?? *No wonder Jesus is NAUSEOUS and VOMITS these Luke warm churches out of his mouth -- Revelation 3:15-16*

Thanks for the comment. We have researched the Greek extensively, and it's not at all ambiguous! Not only in the individual texts, but also the entire testimony of Scripture is 100% clear that homosexual lifestyles are sinful. And of course it's not "condemning" to say so - because the good news of Jesus gives us an answer to our sin! The answer is not to deny it and to continue living in it, but to repent and believe. I think you'd really enjoy one of our sermons on this topic - "The Gospel for the LGBT+ Community": kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qsWSlceqmbvUp30.html But let me give a quick overview of why the Bible is so clear on this: 1. Every statement where the Bible commands or endorses marriage refers to one man and one woman for life. This is true in the very beginning (Genesis 2) and in the New Testament as well (Matthew 19:4-7). 2. While there are countless positive statements about marriage in Scripture, not a single word of Scripture even hints at homosexuality being good or holy. 3. The Christian church has agreed on the immoral nature of homosexuality for its entire 2,000 year history. This included many cultures in which homosexuality was promoted, such as the Greco-Roman culture of the early church. 4. The individual statements of passages such as Romans 1:24-32 clearly speak to the sinful of what we'd call LGBTQ+ lifestyles. It doesn't matter what language you read this passage in, it's quite clear that it's condemning sexual acts with someone of the same gender. Yes, I understand our culture now wants to change all moral standards. But God's word remains clear! And don't forget - "the truth will set you free."

@@dailygospelgcc I appreciate the time you've taken to respond. The more healthy dialgoue about this issue the better. I'm going to say that in my research, the bible is ambiguous. There are many biblical scholars who do not interpret the original Hebrew and Greek text as condeming committed homosexual behavior. I honestly don't know who is correct as the evidence could be used to support either side. So I'm left withasking myself what negative impact is a committed homosexual relationship causing others? I don't see any. And what I really find troubling is how much the church spends on this issue but ignore other sins talked about much more often in the bible. Why does't the church prohibit couples engaging in pre-marital sex from participating in the church? What about all of us wealthy individuals (including myself, which I struggle with)? Why such focus on homosexuality?

@@bwhite661 It's funny you bring that up - I was just sharing with someone the other day how we had to tell someone they couldn't be a member of our church because this person was living with their significant other. And I'd say that any church with being called a church would loving confront someone who was engaging in premarital sex, or any other sin. I'm curious which churches you know of that don't say that premarital sex is sinful? If you're asking why a church would focus on homosexuality - we have hundreds of videos on this channel and a few of them are about LGBTQ+ issues. But guess which ones get all the views? The reason for that is because this is a very big push in the culture right now... it's not the church that's bringing up this sin out of the blue, there's a clear, concerted effort in our culture to normalize and praise LGBTQ+ lifestyles as much as possible. Now that even includes encouraging children to take drugs or remove their genitals in the name of "affirming" their feelings. A video like this is merely responding to the agenda of the culture. So it might be worth asking, "Why does the world see fit to push these lifestyles on people so strongly?" But you asked another great question about what harm is caused by a homosexual lifestyle. And that question is easy to answer, in my opinion. One, doing what God forbids always leads to spiritual death. Deciding that we can redefine something as important as sexuality and marriage is a clear rebellion against God, who created sex and marriage for his purposes. Two, biblical marriage values both men and women. It's God's brilliant plan to show how valuable both a man and woman are, in a union which showcases their unique values. Men and women aren't interchangeable - they each bring something of incredible value to a marriage. This leads to harmony throughout society when men and women depend on and give to each other. Three, biblical marriage promotes the value of children. Marriage is designed by God to bear children. There's no other union than that of a man and a woman that can bring a child into the world! Other unions require a child to never know their father or mother, which is tragic. Often now gay couples will rent a woman's womb and use technology to impregnate her... this treats the woman as an object to be used in the childbearing process and then discarded. Four, biblical marriage gives a stable environment for rearing children. Children need both a father and a mother for maximum flourishing. This isn't to say that a single-parent home can't raise a child well, but it is to say the obvious fact that any home without either a father or mother is incredibly disadvantaged. And again, two men or two women aren't the same as a mother and father, because men and women are uniquely valuable and not interchangeable. I could add more to this list, but I'll let you respond to these if you want! Hopefully you can see that marriage is about much more than just having sexual pleasure, or having personal fulfillment - it's given by God to build families and really to build entire societies.

@@dailygospelgcc I want to say again that I appreciate the dialogue - it's the best way to learn and to understand other people's perspectives. So if you're telling somebody that's having premarital sex that they don't belong in your church, than nobody can belong in your church. We are all sinners and can't free ourselves from sin. It doesn't matter if we're in knowledge of the sin or how often the sin is. We're still loved by God and he wants a relationship with us. Don't you think kicking somebody out of your church pushes them away from God? Once they're married, are they allowed back in? What about all of the wealthy in your church? Aren't they living in sin? What about all of the sellfish people? Aren't they all living in sin? Jesus spent time with all sorts of sinners and didn't require them to repent before he would hang out with them. So why would we do that as Christians?

@@bwhite661 Well, you asked if we confront other sins - and I was saying that we do. Someone can't be a "member" of the church if they are willfully living in sin, but anyone can attend the church and of course we encourage that. But committing to Christianity means forsaking your sin - and so we call people to do that. You can read 1 Corinthians 5 and Matthew 18 if these ideas are new to you - but yes there is a time to remove someone from membership in the church if you will not turn from very clear sin. I hope that clears up what I'm saying!

Is this something you post on every Christian video you watch? Because I think we’ve already had this conversation but you refused to engage with the evidence 😄

@@dailygospelgcc I got no evidence from you - only biblical quotes.

@@darz3829 … you’re not a serious person. Maybe you’re a bot actually

@@dailygospelgcc I'm afraid you gentlemen respond as pre-programmed robots - your replies are rote bible citations, indicating little or no independent thinking. And the few discussions you present are weak attempts to justify your position. Perhaps you could practice a conversation without any reference to the bible once. Either that or give us definitive proof of your assertions (other than the bible).

@@darz3829 So just to be clear, if I explain why the things in the Bible are verifiably true, is that “using the Bible”? Last time I pointed out the historical proof of the empty tomb, the changed lives of the apostles, the strength of their witness even unto death, etc… and then you respond with “Looks like you have nothing outside of the Bible”… so with all due respect it’s hard to take you seriously And if we had a murder case where there were 500 eyewitnesses that saw it happen, it wouldn’t make much sense for me to say “Prove this guy is a murderer but you have to do it without using any eyewitness testimony.” Might be possible, but I’m not sure why that would be wise or necessary. In your case your aversion to the Bible might have a basis, but my guess is you just disagree with what it says so you’re refusing to engage with it’s historical validity. Makes it easier to just say everyone back then was stupid and could have been fooled by a balloon like you argued last time.

About what exactly?