Having Vicious Propensities

No video

Having Vicious Propensities

Рет қаралды 132,331

Күн бұрын

The plaintiff says the defendant’s large dog attacked her little dog and almost killed her, so she’s suing. The defendant says it’s a case of mistaken identity, since her dog is very friendly, never got loose, and never attacked anyone’s dog.
case 31-022

Пікірлер: 368

@tiffanychristian1978 2 жыл бұрын

She should have found her FB or IG and found a pic of her dog with that collar! That was her dog!

@eloahnon4952 2 жыл бұрын

Yes! You know her goofy face has some type of platform.

@katymcginn4644 2 жыл бұрын

😒 YES! WITH THE SPIKED COLLAR ON HER ROTTWEILER. THE SAME DOG HER NEIGHBOR DESCRIBED IN CALLING ABOUT INFORMATION FROM THE FLYER. HER DOG, NO DOUBT. JUST THAT NOW SHE WILL REMOVE ALL THE PHOTOS AFTER READING THIS 😑

@versatileduplicity9313 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly !!!

@Lanie-sl9ne 2 жыл бұрын

Yes it was her dog. The judge was wrong. Her sister recognized the lady. That was enough.

@jawanzaevans8842 2 жыл бұрын

the judge should have asked to see her dog

@teeshante 2 жыл бұрын

It was definitely her dog…she has the same demeanor that the sister described

@trinidadianfruit 2 жыл бұрын

Yes i notice the same thing that's not funny and she got away with it sadly

@donniee.2238 2 жыл бұрын

Precisely. Still, ugly only lasts for a while.

@LLStark Жыл бұрын

I also believe it was her dog! Unless she had a hat or scarf on her head I don't think I would have missed that blond hair; that would've been my evidence of who it was that said "not my dog, not my dog 'smirk'."

@purplesin4288 2 жыл бұрын

The defendant has this smirk on the whole time !!!! Almost like she got away with something

@robbbietheim2096 2 жыл бұрын

It's so sad but Karma tends to find people like her just wait 💯

@dance4life1208 2 жыл бұрын

@@robbbietheim2096 karma isn’t real

@robbbietheim2096 2 жыл бұрын

@@dance4life1208 So says you

@kamododragon256 2 жыл бұрын

@@dance4life1208 i agree. robbbie karma is not real only God is

@rebeccalougee4908 2 жыл бұрын

@@robbbietheim2096 I think she is not the right person.. only due to the fact that they offered a $1000 bucks for the info!! So many people have doberman pincher!!! Their awesome dogs!!

@TheCHELEHB 2 жыл бұрын

She has a little grin on her face during this case…it was definitely her

@LYJmusic 2 жыл бұрын

Yes it was

@soloseraphimheartsong3710 2 жыл бұрын

I feel like it was.

@MsCelicious 2 жыл бұрын

Yea, so sad

@kaylee3867 2 жыл бұрын

She silly til that dog attack the wrong one and her and that catch a hole in they A

@ponurymike3612 2 жыл бұрын

What I learned from this case: If your dog attacks someone or some animal just yell: "Not my dog, Not my dog!" and run away.

@cierrashannon8554 2 жыл бұрын

Lol 😂 this is hilarious. It’s really sad what the sneaky defendant did and I was in tears especially seeing that poor dog injuries but your comment made me laugh!

@lygeiamarie6832 2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@charmaine1775 2 жыл бұрын

#2/ don't forget to laugh. #3/ while in court, keep laughing.

@franklesser5655 2 жыл бұрын

Defendant is guilty. Just not enough proof.

@katymcginn4644 2 жыл бұрын

😒 SO GUILTY! WHAT'S UPSETTING IS THAT THE NEIGHBOR WHO CALLED ABOUT IDENTIFYING THE DOG & OWNER. THAT PERSON SAID "IT'S MY NEIGHBOR, SHE'S GOT A ROTTWEILER." NOT JUST A "BIG BLACK DOG" SPECIFIC BREED! HER DOG! TOO BAD PLAINTIFF DIDN'T HAVE MORE PROOF! 😞

@NellieKAdaba 2 жыл бұрын

🤷🏾‍♀️

@latoyab8337 2 жыл бұрын

It was her dog and the smirk she had on her face the entire time tells it all. I wish the plaintiff had more evidence.

@NellieKAdaba 2 жыл бұрын

Probably, and and she used another collar or something to make it look like it wasn't her.

@zeebee972 2 жыл бұрын

She did it. That slimy smirk on her face during the whole case

@alishamyersakacarr6320 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly smdh

@I3lackVeNoM911 2 жыл бұрын

No offense to the Judge but "has your dog ever attacked anyone before" questions are pointless. Why would anyone say anything that would make their case look bad. Even if it has she'll still say no. "Was that your dog?" Not my dog, not my dog 🥴

@reldra 2 жыл бұрын

The purpose is to see if there is a pattern and the judge can always call animal control there.

@stephenbanks5952 2 жыл бұрын

She can also look for clues of lying. Looking away for example. Or not answering directly. People lying will often skirt around a direct answer and tell lots of unecessary information. When you are lying then it may be hard to just say 'no' and keep your eyes looking at the judge. Some lie easier than others. Not sure about this defendant. Does she really say 'no'? She lists reasons why it couldn't be her dog, it is a 1 year old puppy and is very good natured etc. But does she actually refute the attack? I need to watch again to check. EDIT: I watched it again and she doesn't really show signs of lying. Either it was not her dog or she is a brilliant liar.

@NachoTimelord Жыл бұрын

You'd be surprised...there have been several cases where people have admitted to it. Some people just don't care.

@mustanggirlll 2 жыл бұрын

The defendant was shady I think it was her dog.

@janemoore2710 2 жыл бұрын

My dog was attacked by a dog 7 years ago. I can still see the owners face and the dog - maybe a couple of seconds but that information is imprinted on your mind even if at the time you cannot process it.

@taralen1101 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah that part really got me vexed. Her sister doesn't seem like she's fibbing. Like if it clicks to her, that's the woman, then idk. etc. You can take mental notes of people's faces and bodies. That's why when you go the Supermarket, and you get that "a-ha" feeling, when you notice your old teacher or someone that used to be in your class etc., and depending on whom they are, you may or may not pretend not to notice them, or take a few minutes to, "Oh my god, I haven't seen you ages. Where have you been?", etc., type spiel, so yeah lol. I don't know if her sister reiterated that, or it got edited out but yeah. Hmm. smh.

@kaylee3867 2 жыл бұрын

True

@R_Ali 2 жыл бұрын

The testimony of the sister that the dog owner said “not my dog” and then laughing, fits the personality of the defendant. As she keeps smiling and grinning. I would’ve thought she’d be distraught by being accused.

@cierrashannon8554 2 жыл бұрын

Idk, but that sneaky smirk the defendant keeps displaying really bothers me. Idk if the judge seen it but either way she can’t just rule based on instincts or emotions (although unfortunately a lot of judges do). And also the wording that the plaintiff sister used is what made it seem like she was unsure. I wish the sister would have explained that she used the words allegedly because the defendant was denying it to be her. But she should’ve confidently explained that she could never forget that face, the smirk and the voice that she heard that day. I’m sorry they lost and I’m sorry if I’m wrongfully accusing the defendant because I do believe it was her.

@kimmie2679 2 жыл бұрын

The smirk on her face isn’t okay. I would not have a smirk on my face if I was wrongfully accused. It definitely was her.

@katymcginn4644 2 жыл бұрын

💜 RIGHT, DEFINITELY HER & HER DOG! NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER! 😒

@niyablake 2 жыл бұрын

I suggest you look up people who smile or laugh when nervous. Pseudobulbar affect is people who smile or laugh at inaprinappropriate timesatte times times

@ambrr_lily 2 жыл бұрын

@@niyablake Like maybe when your dog just attacked another animal, so you laugh? Hmm? I think you just made the other person's case.

@niyablake 2 жыл бұрын

@@ambrr_lily did you look up what. Pseudobulbar affect is ? it's just that. Some dies and you y start laughing and it's not because you are a psychopath

@kimmie2679 2 жыл бұрын

@@niyablake so you got from her smirk that she has pseudo-bulbar? I suggest you look up the meaning and symptom of this condition. A smirk is not part of it. Usually, people with this condition experience intense crying or LAUGHING as a response to certain situations. Smirk isn’t it boo. With great considerations, try again.

@ZeldaHatter 2 жыл бұрын

It was definitely her dog that did it. She could’ve easily switched out the collar and lied saying her dog never did anything but all it takes is one time. On top of her smirking it’s just not a good look for her so I’m sure what goes around comes around

@NellieKAdaba 2 жыл бұрын

I thought the same thing, but I'm not sure.

@angelj923 2 жыл бұрын

I think she switched collars when she saw and/or heard about the flyers the plantiff posted smh

@kaylee3867 2 жыл бұрын

So true

@debbiehawley1278 2 жыл бұрын

The lady, the blonde lady keeps laughing, sounds like the original person to me.

@myexmadd 2 жыл бұрын

thats what i said and she still laughing

@NellieKAdaba 2 жыл бұрын

Yes, maybe.

@GetIntoTheBLACK 2 жыл бұрын

Or she thinks it’s a joke she’s getting sued

@AStar-696 2 жыл бұрын

The easiest $1,000 someone ever made!

@versatileduplicity9313 2 жыл бұрын

Word, I should steal dogs and give them back ten days later talkin bout I found them 😂

@nae80West 2 жыл бұрын

Lol right!!

@danquahk830 2 жыл бұрын

When the small dog got attacked, why did the defendant leave her home to run across the street just to say "it's not my dog"? The defendant didn't offer to call for help or offer any type of assistance to the hurt dog. So what was her point in coming to the location of the dog attack? To retrieve her black dog.

@bebeowens9842 2 жыл бұрын

Probably was trying to catch the dog, but when she saw the attack she ran away yelling “not my dog”. 🤷🏽‍♀️

@I3lackVeNoM911 2 жыл бұрын

Your assuming it was her. It's her word against the sisters. She never said she ran up. Whoever did run up was obviously the owner of the dog. We just don't know who

@inukoko2012 2 жыл бұрын

Why she’s smirking like it’s funny? The defendant knows that was her dog…..she just got away w/ it.

@backshotbarbie2035 2 жыл бұрын

You were not there

@inukoko2012 2 жыл бұрын

@@backshotbarbie2035 didn’t need to be, her demeanor shows it was her dog.

@backshotbarbie2035 2 жыл бұрын

@@inukoko2012 now you reading body language lmfao what are you a human lie detector test

@inukoko2012 2 жыл бұрын

@@backshotbarbie2035 naw but I have common sense…clearly everybody else that liked the comment is on the same page as me.

@kathyyaaj5429 2 жыл бұрын

A normal person would call 911 or tried to help the person who is crying for help. Why would she just say not my dog and take off? Seems kind of fishy. 🤷‍♀️

@lavalittle 2 жыл бұрын

12:17 - 12:22 * The Defendant does and says the exact same thing the Plantiff sister said she did when Her dog ate hers like beef on a stick! She smirks and says “Not my dog”. That was definitely her dog

@mickm6309 2 жыл бұрын

The defendants dog is going to attack another dog or a child and there will be witnesses that will testify to the police.

@chelly5001 2 жыл бұрын

The defendants smirk during this would have pussed me tf off!! 😤

@ginger7344 2 жыл бұрын

The defendant is a shining example of duper’s delight.

@alienproperty 2 жыл бұрын

At the end she said “ it wasn’t my dog” lol sounds similar to what the sister was describing

@Dr_Ferg_PharmD 2 жыл бұрын

Smh… To think, I would have gave up the information on the owner for a free chick-fil-a meal… Then possibly negotiate for a free tank of gas 😂… Meanwhile, someone is $1000 richer, someone else is $1000 poorer, and no justice has been served…🤔

@unsolvedmisstory3049 2 жыл бұрын

It was her dog lol

@pmabrouk 2 жыл бұрын

Plaintiff’s sister was a very effective witness. The defendant’s face throughout told everything. Reprehensible behavior! How can anyone hear the testimony and smile!?

@zearab740 2 жыл бұрын

I'm very glad her dog recovered. I'm confused why her sister's testimony identifying the defendant didn't hold up just bc she was frantic at the time... 🤔

@TCKIDD 2 жыл бұрын

Most of the time people who are in traumatic situations don’t remember details that will hold up. Almost like the Mandela effect

@zearab740 2 жыл бұрын

@@TCKIDD ... I'm not too sure about that one 🤔 what about when women identify "rhaypists" from police line ups n efits?

@smfarrie2943 2 жыл бұрын

@@zearab740 many men have been wrongfully convicted based on incorrect lineup identifications

@zearab740 2 жыл бұрын

@@smfarrie2943 agreed, plus downright deliberate evil ‼️

@TMS-pj7fp 2 жыл бұрын

@@TCKIDD that does happen more often than you think, my brother is in law enforcement he said its surprising how many folks can't remember, name wrong person, 4 witnesses have 4 different descriptions of person.

@sarabpreetkaur3360 2 жыл бұрын

Some other dog put up a fake mustache and disguised itself as defendant's dog and attacked the plaintiff's dog.

@versatileduplicity9313 2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@cwalker6911 2 жыл бұрын

🤣

@richardmeade4870 2 жыл бұрын

It’s always these 5000-10000$ cases that have no evidence to prove their cases 😂😂😂

@fairymermaid9013 2 жыл бұрын

ALWAYS!! and then say well I didnt know I needed that 🙄🤣

@Worst_Part 2 жыл бұрын

I wonder if someone gets killed in front of you, would your eye witness testimony not be good enough because the event was too dramatic? That woman knows who she saw!

@niyablake 2 жыл бұрын

You would be surprised how inaccurate eye witness testimony is

@Worst_Part 2 жыл бұрын

@@niyablake Yea I agree, but it's accepted as reliable testimony in criminal cases way more often than not. Point being, it should be more than enough in a civil case.

@youmakemelaugh1797 2 жыл бұрын

The judge full of crap any other time she would've been foaming at the mouth chewing the defendant up just for the constant smirk alone, and why would she jog over there to holler not my dog not my dog, and not is he or you okay???👀

@britneybunch6235 2 жыл бұрын

"Thank you Douglas 😌 "

@garrawaytube2801 2 жыл бұрын

You need to look at the People's Court more often so you could prepare yourself much better in court and stronger evidence

@SB-000 2 жыл бұрын

Marilyn let John talk! He's a big boy snd can speak for himself!!

@manthony777 2 жыл бұрын

The defendant got away with it. She told the clown in the hallway, "it's not my dog" with a big smirk. The only one who doesn't know is the judge smh

@RP6575most 2 жыл бұрын

Very unsatisfying case...

@janets9179 2 жыл бұрын

It will happen again, her dog will attack, and she might not be so lucky.

@Puggy42069 2 жыл бұрын

Could just be a one time thing.

@Britty0189 2 жыл бұрын

1k award and then fighting for vet bills. I get it why she’s suing, just I mean.. 🤷‍♀️

@natalieharris8602 2 жыл бұрын

The dogs are adorable ♥️♥️!!

@sophisticatedmm3632 2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely precious

@pchelloo 2 жыл бұрын

If it WASN'T her dog, and she didn't KNOW the dog at all, why did she feel compelled to get the big dog???? I think the judge knows the defendant has some ties to the attacker dog but her hands were tied due to lack of evidence from the plaintiffs. Don't worry plaintiffs, Karma has a way working everything out.

@tiggersrus3142 2 жыл бұрын

Praise God that the little dog did not die!

@SpiffyPenguin 2 жыл бұрын

I hope the defendant's neighbors saw the smirking and her behavior. Even if it wasn't her dog that did the damage, her attitude is disgusting and she deserves people knowing that this is how she behaves. If this is how she behaves when she thinks she's innocent, I can't imagine how she'd act if she believed she was guilty.

@em42355 2 жыл бұрын

Glad the puppy is still alive ♥️ poor thing

@Zera223 2 жыл бұрын

Lmao The Plaintiff's sister's Spidey sense was tingling 🤣

@Zaddy-Lu 2 жыл бұрын

My daughter's 8 pound chihuahua/rat terrier mix was attacked by 2 100 pound mutts and had his ribcage and rear hips "shattered" (vets words) and he almost didn't make it. The animal hospital said he acted like he had no will to live to the point that they asked us to bring my daughter in to see if seeing my daughter would help him act like he wanted to live. Luckily, they said he started fighting to live after seeing my daughter. He had multiple surgeries and was in intensive care for 2 days and took 3 months to recover. I still have nightmares reliving seeing him being thrown around like a rag doll by those dogs. I'm so grateful he made it and that none of my children saw it happen. That was in 2015 and he's made a full recovery except for having arthritis from the injury. I feel for the plaintiff. We weren't able to sue because the owner said our dog went into their yard and it was a she said, she said situation.

@pryncessstephanie21 2 жыл бұрын

They all looked so much alike I thought this was going to be a real identity theft lol

@robbbietheim2096 2 жыл бұрын

All the head phone switching is weird " THE PEOPLE'S COURT couldn't afford to set them up with two headphone sets 😀

@eboneyboswell4328 2 жыл бұрын

Lol right

@HeavenlyiceDream 2 жыл бұрын

you realize they are doing this from home? you want the show to provide them with new accessories at their homes?

@robbbietheim2096 2 жыл бұрын

@@HeavenlyiceDream Damn don't you recognize sarcasm when you hear it jeez always got to spell something out for the people in the back, SMH 💯

@foreverever9001 2 жыл бұрын

I hate the dog cases

@kiawilliams5541 2 жыл бұрын

You're not the only one😟

@owlthepirate5997 2 жыл бұрын

God, these are addicting as hell! 😄

@pauweewee247 2 жыл бұрын

The sister gave a wishy washy statement and should have been more definite and confident about the owner. Sister messed up the case.

@kdubbcomedy2458 2 жыл бұрын

I love the new after talk with her husband.

@ftngie 2 жыл бұрын

yeah i didn’t realize he was handsome until they started that segment

@TyHarrodTX 2 жыл бұрын

Me too

@sandrarobbins4155 2 жыл бұрын

That lady knows her dog did that because she still has that same smile. Pay the lady that is not right her dog almost died.

@sandylane5498 2 жыл бұрын

You know the defendent is guilty... that smirk tells it all!

@niyablake 2 жыл бұрын

Nope. you would be surprised that there are people who laugh when nervous or angry or just do it at in inappropriate times

@versatileduplicity9313 2 жыл бұрын

@@niyablake oh shut up

@niyablake 2 жыл бұрын

@@versatileduplicity9313 So you have nothing positive to say or the ability to dispute this? an

@taralen1101 2 жыл бұрын

@@niyablake No, because you know her ass is guilty as sin. Like I can understand, if this were a more up in the air case, to where it's mixed, on whether who's at fault, and it's inconclusive and hearsay etc. Not this time. If the defendant were more respectful and empathetic to the situation, I'd be more convinced. She's over there making faces, being diva, also berating and degrading the plaintiff saying, "She should have taken her phone out." etc., (kinda using reverse psychology tactics to take the blame off her etc.), when her dog is bleeding to death and should have/could have/would have, and by the time it dawned on her to record, she already zoomed down the street. etc. Her ass is guilty morally. Legally, she got away Scott Free, as the reward money thing is kinda shady, even if, she was just looking for justice for her dog, and I know the plaintiff didn't have that intention with the reward money etc., and the defendant didn't officially, accidentally tell on herself during testimony, but yeah. There is like a 0.1% chance it was another woman, who fit her attitude and profile. It's her.

@Rachelief 2 жыл бұрын

I think it was her. Too bad there wasn’t evidence

@scandia61 2 жыл бұрын

This case made me sick to my stomach. There's no way it wasn't the defendants dog. The attitude she has throughout the entire case is sickening.

@Ellie80681 2 жыл бұрын

the sister should have just said she remembered her....not that they did the flyers

@Aries-tx3zz 2 жыл бұрын

And defendant sister used the word allegedly.

@arianefr78 2 жыл бұрын

WHAT? The defendant simply claims her dog doesn't have a spiked color and that's it, what about the fact that the sister saw the defendant, she is a material witness and the judge asks the defendant 'was it you?' did she really expect the defendant to say 'yes'. With the way the defendant was smirking the whole time and then even more at the end, says it all, that smirk and the words 'not my dog' go hand in hand. This was an outrageous verdict...

@Mzkc1 2 жыл бұрын

The gag is the person who got the $1k is the defendants husband and she know for a fact the plaintiff didn’t have proof it was her dog!

@stephenbanks5952 2 жыл бұрын

I admire the defendants so much. They spoke so clearly and eloquently, especially the sister. Their detective work was also to be admired. Somebody made an easy 1000 dollars. I have an awful feeling that it was the defendant's dog. Her smirk annoyed me. The sister was pretty convinced it was her. I bet she Will not use the studded collar anymore.

@Maqqin 2 жыл бұрын

Like plenty others have already stated the defendant had a nasty smirk on her face. She’ll definitely get what’s coming to her!

@jillcabler2186 2 жыл бұрын

The defendant is a trip,she still seems to have a smirk on her face Glad the little puppy is ok Wish the Plaintiff had more evidence

@shaneldaharris94 2 жыл бұрын

In this day and age I guarantee someone's ring has the footage of the attack

@authorlydiagreen1862 2 жыл бұрын

She was distraught at that moment but even if she got a 3 second glance once she calms down it came back clearly to her memory. I know this because when my husband was murdered the detective told me even though you are shocked and panicked your mind can remember things once you calm down.

@trinidadianfruit 2 жыл бұрын

Sorry about your husband i hope justice was served for your family

@LovelyCeee 2 жыл бұрын

These women are so gorgeous!!! Black does not crack!!!

@v.a.993 2 жыл бұрын

Was the sister sworn in before she started testifying?

@ftngie 2 жыл бұрын

good catch lol

@katiebug0221 2 жыл бұрын

I noticed that too

@CooknVibewithannmarielove 2 жыл бұрын

On another note I haven’t seen wooden walls the defendant had like that since the 90s 😆

@youmakemelaugh1797 2 жыл бұрын

Lmao🤣😭😭🙄yeah I have those

@shannonmcdaniel3507 2 жыл бұрын

Me either 92 to be exact

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

Very odd painting 🖼 The Plaintiff is sitting in front of 🤔.

@Britty0189 2 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure it’s Adam and Eve

@foreverever9001 2 жыл бұрын

She likes it that’s why she has it lol

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

@@Britty0189 I figured it was probably really famous & I would be humbled.

@Britty0189 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidellis5141 …okay? 🤨

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

@@Britty0189 I'm glad that's it's not some masterpiece 😆 - I'm not in any way bummed by your comment. You're cool !

@cecynay7369 2 жыл бұрын

This is one of those cases where you should reach out to the person via text and get them to slip up or admit something somehow before coming to court. I think the judge neglected to think about why a woman would run towards the dog fight, say "not my dog" and run away with the dog following her, but even then the proof would be scant. Text conversation with some acceptance of some of the facts would have sealed the deal. Poor pup 🥰

@jeretso 2 жыл бұрын

Bottom Line: If you own a cute little dog you need to video your dog walks. Dogs get loose and roam around different neighborhoods. Sometimes homeowners dont even know their dog knows how to escape the yard and return without getting caught.

@Shaikhofilm 2 жыл бұрын

In this case, you need more proof than just lip service. The defendant denies it was her dog. Perhaps the plaintiff could have looked at the perimeters of the property for more evidence. Or see if someone will admit.

@katymcginn4644 2 жыл бұрын

😒 NOT HER DOG? RIGHT 😑 I WONDER WHY SHE CHANGED HER HAIR COLOR & CUT HER HAIR. SHE LOOKS A LOT DIFFERENT FROM THE PHOTO THEY TOOK WITH HER WALKING HER ROTTWEILER. HUH! ALSO, TELL ME THAT ROTTIE DIDN'T HAVE A COLLAR ON WITH SPIKE'S. YOU KNOW THAT OWNER'S ALWAYS BUY THOSE FOR THEM. JS 🤔

@badmofoal6544 2 жыл бұрын

So she disguised herself, but still admitted it was her in the picture?

@romerobryan9289 2 жыл бұрын

I'm not one to judge BUT the defendant is DEFINITELY guilty! The smirk on her face and body language says it all. She comes across as what the sister described the person coming over saying "that's not my dog" walking off. She looks like absolute trash! The plaintiff should have brought her case to Judge Mathis. He would have got to the bottom of the case and made sense of it all.

@nyaj754 2 жыл бұрын

The person who was rewarded the $1000 would’ve had to give me some concrete evidence! Sound like the plaintiff got played

@adrianprince7266 2 жыл бұрын

The plantiff didn't have enough evidence to prove her case. Plain&simple

@artistjoh 2 жыл бұрын

Wearing a prominant cross as if to suggest she is too “holy” to do anything wrong is commonly done by those who are attempting to hide guilt. Hiding behind religion can never wipe the look of guilt on her face. There might not be enough evidence, but her demeanor and that cross sure do make her look both guilty and dishonest.

@lynnortiz3763 2 жыл бұрын

What else judge wanted ,sister didn't saw where she went but recognize her..smh.

@granitemoss1451 2 жыл бұрын

I don't believe the Defendant for a second. She's lying through her teeth. What a nasty, heartless human being.

@coffeeaddictexpress5038 2 жыл бұрын

Her dogs are absolutely adorable lol. I love dogs, big or small.

@tedwertman2115 2 жыл бұрын

Tough case. Hard to trust a stranger for info over 1k money. Like others i didn't like the smile on the other ladies face. I remember years ago, there was 2 people knocking on my door telling me i need to remove my dead cat off the road because it could caused a crash. I told them i don't have a cat and they stood there yelling at me that it was on my property and i need to remove it off the road. I asked where and they said down the road a bit. I told them that not even my property and they still kept yelling at me saying if i was a decent person i should go and remove it off the road. I told them there is 2 of you and you know where it's at, so why don't one of you remove it off the road and then i shut the door in there face. I felt bad for the cat, but at the time i was alone with my baby sleeping in the next room.

@judeiz2203 2 жыл бұрын

Too bad the plaintiff didn't ask neighbors for their Ring & CCTV footage as well as check her social media for her dog wearing a spike collar. 🤬 That dog is clearly NOT a puppy, he's grown already. I hope the plaintiff spoke to animal control so it's noted when he attacks again.

@lilo4399 2 жыл бұрын

I hate this zoom format. This is no different than watching a local case, with people sitting at home talking to the local judge. Boring!

@nunya8010 2 жыл бұрын

Thank god they talked about her husbands clothes at the end,that's what I wanted to hear about not the case!

@cdnhawk65 2 жыл бұрын

That defendant is definitely guilty..quite smug wearing that cross around her neck.

@RileyCullen1 2 жыл бұрын

She’s guilty as sin!

@cam2573 2 жыл бұрын

Plaintiffs sister ruined this case talking about allegedly like if u saw her say that🤦🏽‍♀️

@katymcginn4644 2 жыл бұрын

😒 PROBABLY BECAUSE IN ALL THE NEWS, IN ALL THE NEWSPAPERS, IT'S ALWAYS SAID THAT WAY ABOUT CRIME! IT'S ALWAYS "ALLEGEDLY" PART OF THE "INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY" CRAP 😑

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

First To Arrive For Court Today , Only To Be Turned Away ! No Audience.

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

Chris warned me of this ! I was second !

@AN-sm9ju 2 жыл бұрын

Ha Ha. Not first to the comments either!

@islandmariposa- 2 жыл бұрын

If this defendant is lying which I think she is,she will get hers pretty soon. All this smirk and laugh is just you showing how evil you are

@shelocsher2396 2 жыл бұрын

She’s not defending herself or her dog, and the fact that she seems to think this is funny leads me to believe it was indeed the defendant’s dog 😒

@yesterdaystoday1079 2 жыл бұрын

The le should have been called on spot . That defendant is guilty

@BADBOIOFBOSTON 2 жыл бұрын

Good afternoon

@davidellis5141 2 жыл бұрын

Good Morning ! Congratulations 🏅

@hizlioness6577 2 жыл бұрын

The Defendant knew it was her dog...

@kittyb275 2 жыл бұрын

Why wasn't her eye witness and identifying the criminal enough? Police do it every day.

@jcymngo 2 жыл бұрын

She felt the presence of danger. 🤣

@Nannerchan 2 жыл бұрын

That sucks.

@jayt7227 2 жыл бұрын

Wow so funny Douglas looks older but somehow milian is timeless lol like for real.

@shannaholmes833 2 жыл бұрын

They should’ve went around the area asking for video footage if possible. I’m sure there would’ve been cameras around.

@kittykats785 2 жыл бұрын

Why didn't the judge ask the defendant so funny and why she smiling like, but she didn't that was sad, the plaintiff should have won that's my feeling, if the defendant was so innocent why wouldn't she stand and help the plaintiff, especially what happened to the plaintiffs dog, why did she run why did she say that's not her dog, that's really sketchy and odd, the judge should have asked the defendant that,