He's just a closet Chelsea fan he always defends them

@@unclebensrice4702I mean he does a podcast with 2 other arsenal fans tbf so it’s probably to wind them up most of the time

i mean yeah but at the end of the day it doesn't matter how well you play all that matters is the points on the tabel, if it was just a battle on who plays better football city would be invincible

@@frostedtippy1200why did arsenal fans not see this viewpoint now when this is the exact same thing they were saying when they finished 8th

It's one of those surface level arguments "They've spent 1b"...yes but they haven't spent 1b on a day 1 first 11 squad that can compete with City, they've spent 1b on a under 23 squad that won't be expected to come good for another 2-3 years, that's when you judge whether 1b was a good investment or not.

@@CB-lw7tyexactly

@@CB-lw7tyit’s obviously not a good investment though. Chelsea will undoubtedly compete for the title in the next 5 years, but they could’ve done that by spending 300million, perhaps. Definitely with 500 million. You spent double that only to say “well in 2 or 3 years time we could be good” 😂😂😂

@@bobf1267 It's something nobody knows ultimately, the only certainty is that they've overpaid for numerous players, but it could be in 2 years they start dominating the league with a stable team and win 3 titles on the bounce and another European cup where you say fair enough money well spent. Could be they end up being lack lustre sitting in 8th needing to reset half the players and you call it stupidity 🤷‍♂ Ultimately if I had to guess the reason they've done what they're doing is because they're building the stadium in the near future too, so reset the squad, build the stadium, refresh the squad works financially well off, which again if you come out of that situation in regular contention and top 4 you'd say it's good money that didn't need extra investment while the stadium was being built, but again who knows. It's all potential now but trying to put some level of judgement on the outcome that won't be seen for 5 odd years is stupidity in itself too.

@@CB-lw7ty but some things they have done don’t make sense. Why buy Lavia, Lesley, Caicedo AND the guy on loan to forest. Only one of those should play since they have Enzo already. Why sell Mount when he slots alongside Enzo and one of them. Why buy Badiashile when Colwill is right there. Cucurella was obviously a mistake but why let go of Hall on the cheap. Sanchez for 25mil makes no sense either. You’re essentially letting whatever happens dictate how you view their choices but that’s not how choices work. They could win the league and it’s still fair to say they made bad choices. (They could also finish 10th and it wouldn’t mean the players they bought are bad, shit happens)

Underrated comment

😂😂😂😂fr

when u gonna just give up on james. you just made him club captain and he’s out just as much as martial. it’s embarrassing.

@@ggmu2003shut up mate respectfully 😂

​@@ggmu2003If Gusto keeps improving,he certainly can overtake Reece

@@ggmu2003you can’t compare a mediocre when fit player , to the best player in his position when fit , and think it’s a fair comparison, ain’t no RB RWB that is even remotely close to his ability when fit

@@ggmu2003thing is martial isn’t top 2 in his position when healthy… Reece James is

Trust me like where does this come from it’s 3 games in ffs and Chelsea have looked much better than last year in those 3 🤣

No one likes Chelsea mate

Not exactly an agenda when it's facts. You spend a bil you HAVE to be challenging for the title and other comps. Pulling 4 from 9 is embarrassing.😅

@@brettpearce8843 mate we were the only English team to have 2 champions leagues in the last decade and all the other major trophies within that decade, quit chatting wazz. New ownership has spent money, go blame Boehly 🤣🤣

@@brettpearce8843they tied Liverpool and lost to west ham which they was dominating the 1st half. With injuries. .. 🙄

100% agree, I’m backing yous to get top 4 tbh as long as Nicolas Jackson starts bagging a few goals

Yh I always thought this😂😂😂

To see how wrong they are

If you actually watch football you would know that Chelsea haven't been unimpressive. But according to the bald twat in the corner the new players have to perform from day 1.

@@Freddiem2000💀💀💀

This was recorded before tbf

@@louis2712l that’s my point. That’s why I said he’s bound to defend

@@UltraGC_ ah right gotcha

Yep lol 😂

What I thought was most impressive was that last game when Walker made a mistake and they conceded a goal they were able to switch gears instantly and like a minute later had a chance with Alvarez which he missed. And then they kept going and 3 minutes later they rectified the situation. Then they immediately slowed back down again. It seems like they are conserving they’re energy because they don’t want to be as deep as they were last year going for everything. Much different from Arsenal last game

ThIs was before those matches

5-1

@@nniico_4-0 and 3-1 now 👌

This comment is so on the money

Lewis in the mud

mate look at the perfromances compared to last season so far, clear improvement

Arsenal must be in the bottom 3 now for this list after drawing with all the money they have spent with his logic ?

the thing is they do look a good team they just dont have experience together as a squad. for example with man city, we've always had the quality and capabilities to win the UCL, we've had it the last couple of years, but it takes time and experience in those competitions (and a little luck) to pull it off. The more this chelsea XI play together, the better they'll be. They dont even have a designated pen taker yet lol thats how new their squad is.

@@shushshmuck1436 yeah okay, still no way near good enough with the disgusting amount of money they spent. Everyone would be skating city if they spent as much as they have and were shit.

Like what?

this was before the city game, Im a blade myself but he isnt wrong considering the time it was recorded.