Very informative. Thanks doc!

Thanks a lot sir. I know there are not many views but your presentations are extremely helpful and valuable for us, trainees.

Thank you! My biopsy showed ER/PR both strong positive HER2 Negative. Just had an SMX 7/27 and IHC showed Her2 2+ so equivocal, plus ER/PR positive again. Currently awaiting FiSH results. I'm hopeful it's negative. I had DCIS with lumpectomy and radiation for my 1st dx back in 2000.

Fantastic presentation

Excellent session on HER 2 IHC interpretation..Full of practical tips for routine practice. Highly grateful to you Dr. Alexander Damron

Thanks a lot it was very helpful

it was very interesting thanks a lot Dr.

Thank you!

thank you!!

Excellent thank you

thanks for the nice lecture. I have a case of well differentiated carcinoma, grade1 with tubular features that is showing a moderaTe basal/bassolateral staining. would you call it 2+ and send it for FISH?

Thanks Sir for this highly informative lecture :)

Dr.Damron, thank u so much! Extremely well explained..I always found Her 2 challenging. At 10:01, “Barely perceptible at Low Power” ..I am assuming it to be 4X obj that you are referring to? (since at 14:01 u hv shown a 4X obj.image)

Thanks a lot

Hello Dr. Damron, after neoadjuvent therapy on a her2+ grading, a pathology report read residual cells 20 showing degenerative qualities, almost pcr, how close were these cells to destroyed, and how this few still remaining in your opinion? Less than 1mm in tumor bed -(or to any other qualified opinion) Thanks

Hi Dr Damron. How will we be able to differentiate the location of HER2 staining? such as cytoplasmic, membranous or nuclear. I am finding it hard! Could you please explain? thank you

I mean some cases look 1+but they are not faint they are strong don’t exactely fit in definition of 1+should we better call them equivocal thank you so much for your excellent le tures

Dear professor the picture show strong staining focally. even it is incomplete in more than 10 % but it doesn’t fit in definition of score 1+because it is not faint. Can we call it equivocal. As it doesn’t fit all n o. Not in 1. Not in3.

In cases with weak / moderate intensity but incomplete and in less than 10 percent of tumor cells… what score do you give to this one.. it’s not in the CAP, I could find it

Hello what do you recommend for me to start with as a beginner through breast pathology??? I have little basic information about pathology. Thanks

Moses Nabem Agwa

Excellent thank you