Like clockwork. Every few months to a year a spate of shootings happens, people remember they have to buy into the "Gun vs. Mental Health" debate and the internet cracks down for no reason so they can say they're doing something before everyone forgets about it again until the next time they have to pretend they care.

Sale? Nope Assembly? (Uhh... do you know what goes into making a gun like this youtube? Of course you don't, silly question...) Hell no! Abuse? What? Misuse? He is recklessly informing people about history without the use of a hollywood producer, enough publicity to protect him, and/or major network backing... So you got em there. ...Go fuck yourself youtube guy. >__>

Wow... Y'all just gonna have to stop giving such abusive history lessons I guess. Stop misusing history. 😲

Do not forget that YT is owned by the same rocket surgeons that tried and ultimately failed to ram Google+ down our collective throats. If you are expecting logic....

This is what happens when the Black Box sees you spreading false information about its precious Webley revolver

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

lol.

Also sorry we brutally cut the cylinders of many antique revolvers so we could own them without firearms permits and registration because antiques aren’t guns unless used in a crime. Mostly Webley’s in .455 because moon clips and .45 ACP, (ideally low power loads but people are dumb).

I too would like to apologize for all the apologies. Honestly we mostly don’t mean it, remember we did invent hockey and basketball so we aren’t exactly afraid to be jerks.

@@al-dk9xd You know that one guy who everyone hopes won't show up to the party, because he has no idea how humor works and just says annoying shit? Yeah. That's you today.

Great quality isn't easy.

I appreciate your tenacious pursuit of quality in your videos.

It's cool. You guys do great work and my Primer withdrawal symptoms from last night and this morning are no reasons to put up a vid before it's ready

C&rsenal first off love what you doing. Second I would just like to ask when the Martin Henry.

Copyright?? On what? I'm curious

Yes sir in her case a Sally Browne belt the female version was tapered to accommodate her hips

What us the time stamp on it?

If you wear a suspender sideways like that, your basically in a Star Trek evil universe. (Yesterday's Enterprise, In a Mirror Darkly)

@@Edax_Royeaux An esoteric reference, but a welcome one.

@keith moore True that for sure! Fortunately for Canada, it had its own ammunition production specifically to avoid dependence on British imports. However, it was all in Quebec, so getting its goods beyond Winnipeg was no easy task.

Aren't they basically the same. Take whichever is more durable

I think they'd do pretty well with .38 Special or .38 +p. I wouldn't be pushing my luck with .357 Magnum.

Do you have the stock for it??? Makes a big difference..... Just wondering....

donn kelley, no I do not have a stock for it. Yet I wish I did. I do have 3 stripper clips for it. They load nice without any fuss. I have a lee enfield mark 3 and the stripper clips for it almost never work. I’m usually fussing around with the last round or two getting them into the magazine after they have been stripped from the stripper clip. I usually only load one stripper clip of 5 into my lee enfield due to the second stripper clip not going in. Rimmed cartridges are always a fuss. My K 98 Mauser stripper clips feed like butter. Mauser Bolt actions are the best by far.

@@Ashley-Morton I think it depends on the clips, and their condition/manufacturing along with a small bit of luck. I have seen modern chinese clips for a Mosin-Nagant feed with no problem, and actual Russian ones not work correctly.

GunDude82, I have a Finish M39 Mosin Nagant. All three of my stripper clips work, for the most part, great. It’s a very accurate rifle. I can hit steel targets with the iron sights reliably at 300 yards.

Exactly. Allied officers wore Sam Browne belts for two reasons -- one was that it helped support the weight of a pistol, and the second was to mark their status as an officer. Many soldiers might not recognize the rank insignia of an allied country's army, but they knew if they saw a Sam Browne they were looking at an officer, and they had to render the appropriate military courtesies. For this reason, Sam Browne belts, though not an official part of U.S. uniform, were authorized for wear in Europe. Officers liked them for the smart appearance they imparted, and upon returning, some US army officers threw their Sam Browne's over the rails of their ships in protest at the army's refusal to allow them to be worn Stateside. Meanwhile, returning USMC officers, under navy command, looked on smugly, as they were allowed to wear theirs. (Army officers eventually got to wear them stateside, but only after John Pershing -- who liked the Sam Browne too -- replaced Peyton C. Marsh as army chief of staff in 1921.)

An interesting fact . As a former Marine, I MUST say, "sucks to be Army". 😁 I have also seen photos of 1900ish Marines wearing "Picklehauben" type helmets in dress uniform.

@@tombogan03884 Well, as a former army NCO, I hate to admit it, but the army has generally not done as well in the uniform department as the marines -- with the exception of the WWII "pinks and greens" officers' uniforms, which I am glad to see they brought back (and for all ranks to boot). I wish we'd had those when I was in.

You just want a new Ike Ja ket . 😂

Dude, he was so sad when it failed to list last night. Edit: (this morning, forgot it was 3am...)

At least I had access to it during my run at the gym this morning. Made it go by much quicker :).

Hey, at least it's in .45...ish.

Wheel guns are real guns, sonny Jim. _>sticks thumbs in suspenders

@@JamesPolymer muh stopping power (hands are visibly shaking when attempting to drink tea)

Wears

Great story!

He answered this question for the browning. "If you are wondering why a gun you are thinking of is not featured yet and is widely available to obtain it is because I discovered a lot of material to research. It is because I am trying to finish investigating and spotting truths, statistics, and sources are reliable and etc. before posting." It's not his exact words. It is my summarized abridged version of what he said. Brownings have a long history, massive global influence, and lore. It would expected for it to take a long time. It's so massive that you can find evidence of people in the globe were calling all semi-auto pistols brownings even if it wasn't one because it was so synonymous with gas operated semi-auto handguns. It is like how we say kleenex for a piece of tissue papers even if it is not from the same company. It took a while before people quit doing this. It was common around the 1899-1919 range. I think by the 20s the market adapted and people started calling them by their names. Because of this it makes things hard in researching. You can't always tell from some printed material if the person was saying an actual browning or just saying it as a nickname. I know it sounds absurd people would did do this. But I once came across some old scripture print from the turn of the century where it did indicate people were calling any ANY darn semi-auto self loading pistol a browning. I forgot the source but it might have been some newspaper, book, or etc. printed during that era and someone posted online. It was posted not because people calling them brownings. It was for a different unrelated reason and involved documenting history or whatever other reason a person would scan and compile old printings online. Before this I heard of the claim people were doing this in those days. I took it as a grain of salt and one day... I discovered hint/evidence in something made back then showing the person was in fact doing this in what he typed and referenced other people were doing the same. I basically discovered it accidentally. Sadly, I didn't kept the source link to share with you, but I suggest just flipping through material written or printed from time range and you probably will eventually find evidence indicating people were doing this like I did. It isn't easy, but you will eventually spot it.

.41 Russian???

@@donnkelley6823 I believe it was a Colt round, he mentions the .41 Thunderer around 2:25

Free markets. European gun makers competed for the monopsonic government buyers, US ones competed for the civilian market. Former ones had to appease politicians that have never even seen a gun in their lives, latter ones competed for the favor of lifelong shooters whose life depended on the guns.

@@georgiishmakov9588 you realize most officers in Europe bought there own pistols and the pocket market was booming

@@paullytle1904 but how often will they use it? Sure dueling was still a thing, as was target shooting, but how often would they actually use it in combat?

@@baker90338 colonial conflicts for one thing and there were plenty of wars in Europe during the 19th century

Probably because many Americans relied on their guns daily and would only buy the best.

It did. Not in abundance, but it did. There was fifty Colt saa give to the French resistance in WW2. We never got one of them back damn french

@@user-ho4nw5sf3w Wrong War , brother

@@oolooo both wars

@@oolooo you need to read more. The info is out there.

@@user-ho4nw5sf3w Could you show it to me ? .

Try a python main spring in your 1917. Primers were made of thicker material before WW1 requiring a heavier hammer blow. I did this to mine a long time ago like it.

William baird wow, that is a genuine game changer for .22 magnum.

There's also the Uberti clones of the Smith and Wesson Scholfield revolver in 45. Colt, 44-40, 38 special but yeah just those 2 guns

@@ryangshooter_1682 yeah that's true. Wheeler is also making a new Webley, but I was saying there is a new modern pistol purporting to be viable in the modern world that is top break. The Sholfield reproduction and the Webley are retro designs keying into the classic style shooting enthusiast market. The Sholfield reproduction somewhat popular in the SASS competitions.

"Thou shalt not hate the US wheelgun, and thou shalt love all guns videos as they were thy own."

balancedfordaylight1 very lovely to hold and shoot but not “really” Colt “feeling”. That being said they do wear in very well and the triggers whilst heavy are smooth.

@@john-paulsilke893 I cant wait till they get to the model 1917 I wonder if they will do the colt and S&W 1917 together or seperate ...................

@keith moore We have the metals and manufacturing to make a really strong Top break however it would be expensive and a niche product because of the price so I don't think it will happen, I know for a fact though That if you used to scandium, or a type of titanium alloy You could make one that could handle anything but that price is gonna keep manufactures away from making one, There's only 2 modern top breaks that I can think of the Uberti Smith and Wesson Schofield revolver clones, and the North American Arms mini top break in 22. Mag and 22 lr.

@keith moore See you say that modern clones of the school field Handle smokeless 45 Pretty darn well and that's a pretty stout round You could also fix the Latch with Tungsten or something else strong with no flex Like I said it would be very expensive hence why It would be unlikely anyway

Z, I don't think they were making any (lever action rifles\carbines) in .45 Colt back then either, for that you needed to go with .44-40 or .38-40.

Talk to a gunsmith face-to-face, preferably with the actual pistol in-hand. Whenever you're talking about century-old weapons, there are too many variables to say yes or no without a real examination.

I would take a Luger that was a very cool gun back then

Cruise control for....ignore.

yes, mine is close to 18