You're awesome bro 😊😊🎉🎉🎉🎉

Nicely done video

Any updates about Prince Eugene video?

Make next part soon

"Volleys", didn't happen in actual war for except maybe the opening salvo, archers shot at their own best rate of fire.

Nope. He was incompetent. That's why he achieved success for everyone. Competent people only serve their own clique.

@@NelsonDiscovery i

​​@NelsonDiscovery I believe Charles VII of France was more hesitant than incompetent despite his poor decisions regarding Joan of Arc's contributions to France. Overall, Charles VII reminds me of Union General George McClellan, who was also too hesitant/cautious during the height of the Civil War yet, like the King, was an excellent organizer of the military. He, too, has been highly controversial to some degree. Ironically, McClellan was named "Little Napoleon." & "Little Mac," however, he was more like Napoleon's chief of staff, Berthier, who had no knack for military science yet was an effective steward of logistics & overhaul of Union forces with their training, etc. Berthier overhauled the Grand Armee's organizational & administrative efficiency to the apex of Napoleon's military success in the early years of his career & reign. Another example could be said of Captain Sobel from the 101st Airborne Division (from Band of Brothers), which paints the man very negatively throughout the series until you realize later on that Captain Winters & everyone gave him credit for training them to prepare for the horrors ahead during WW2 despite not loving the man & calling him incompetent with maps, etc

Is it by Charles order or he only need to sign the order??? Need more proof

It's not charles VII who's view as incompetent, but his father, Charles VI

And he shoulndt say "the l'Aure", since the "l' " is the short of "le", meaning "the". It's like he said "the THE Aure".🤓

@@yansoloooo Correct. This grammatical transgression deserves a wrist-slap, or at least a couple lashes with a wet noodle.

Thanks to Joan of Arc.. without her, there would be no United France.

@@comicgenius21 total bullshit. The English had been kicked out of France except Calais and Bordeaux by 1375 ; only reason reason they came back is because of a civil war regarding who should hold the regency for Charles VI. Read on the subject man, you've been told lie upon lie by English propaganda because they wanna make it seem like they almost had it. Truth is : they never even got close

​@@comicgenius21she die nothing except the siege of Orleans

@@osowiecwalking9434she motivated the troops 85 years into a loosing war

GawtDAM hero

Doing the lord's work sir.

0:49 *BUT FIRST A PAID AD FOR JURASSIC WORLD ALIVE* 🦕 🦖

This is the key. It's one thing to do a play-by-play recreation of a battle from, say, the War of Spanish Succession or the Umayyad expansions, but without context about what those overall wars/campaigns were about and why the battle mattered, the videos would be very unaccessible to most viewers.

yeah so entertaining watching those squares beating the shit out of each other

@@dogwater6793 not sure if you're being genuine or sarcastic, but i absolutely am enthralled by little dancing squares...

😂

😆

ahhh mhhhh bonjour bonjourrrrrrr

😂🎉🎉🎉

Hon hon hon

The French totally learned from their mistakes.

This would actually be the inspiration for Napoleon a few hundred years later when he developes the corp system for mini armies that had their own horse, infantry, artillery, and skirmishers to work effectively on their own instead of a large main force.

@@evanpeacock6103 I think he was probably more inspired by Roman legions, since they would have been much more iconic and widely used, but it is definitely possible that he actually took inspiration from this moment, given his interests in history.

@Kongolese King absolutely. They were more focused on the "social status" of the cavalry component to win battles, given how the nobility kept repeating the same disastrous results against the English, and not properly ulitizing the strength of the cavalry at critical moments. They would, unfortunately would go back to that flawed strategy in the coming centuries until Napoleon reformed the military to the Corp System

@@evanpeacock6103 Naopleon was mostly inspired by Hannibal Barca, therefore if this tactic of creating military divisions was adopted by Napoleon with inspiration from Charles 7th, then Charles must in turn have been inspired by Hannibal too, because Hannibal had Divisions within his Armies in Italy in the 2nd Punic War.

It’s very late in the medieval era. Many people consider 1453 to be the end of the Middle Ages with the end of the Hundred Years’ War and the fall of Constantinople. We are also well into the Renaissance by now.

there’s a few different commentators, but this gentlemen is fantastic. One of my favorite channels.

Plus he apparently knows how to pronounce French names and locations properly.

@@jonshive5482 Yes , and that could not be more appropriate, if what you are narrating is a French-English conflict !…

As a native English speaker, I must say the accent feels slightly "off". The emphasis and pace is rather odd. Additionally, no Englishman worth their salt would pronounce French names and locations with that degree of accuracy. It is an unwritten rule that we English mangle French pronunciation at every opportunity.

@@bernardotorres4659 its an English accent NOT a British accent

Glad you enjoyed it!

@@Cancoillotteman lol To be fair I see the same bias just about everywhere. Anglosaxons just dominate the world. So most battles will have seen them victorious. That doesn't mean there isn't a lot of interesting history that didn't involve any anglosaxons. And History Marche has been very good in enlightening such topics as the struggle between Byzantium and the Bulgar Empires, The rivalry between Islam and the Chinese Empire, The Jughurtine Wars (or was that House Of History?) and many others.

But "Charl-A" is not the French pronunciation of Charles...

@@AGS363 hes still pronouncing the names of all the cities in french. if its not "Charl-A" then how do you say it in french?

Char-le, but not "tcha" like and english monarch, more as "sh-ar-l"

@@grimgorironside Honestly just say "Tcharlz" as you usually do in english, there's no real point in trying to do it in a "french" way if the name you're trying to pronounce is common to both languages and everyone knows what it is.

@@nolletthibault2031 its interesting to know how the people around him actually said his name thats all, i know it doesnt make much of a difference.

Yeah, finally some competent men noticing weaknesses and exploiting them correctly. And FINALLY the nobility isn't fucking it up. It's... It's beautiful. 🥺😭

3:47 3:49

Thank you so much!

@@HistoryMarche 😊

You have to understand England was a poor irrelevant nation that nobody in Europe cared about. When England started the 100 years war it was the equivalent of Mexico starting a war with the USA. When the English won battles it shocked the whole of Europe, when the French won battles it was merely expected. Even the king of France was forced to admit "the flower of chivalry of the whole world is with England" is the early stages. By the time of Henry VI, the English had taken so much wealth from France and spent it all face-lifting churches and castles across England that it was a totally different place to what it was 100 years before. The Lancastrian element just wanted to live the high life and party, they wanted to spend on luxury and they abused Henry VI's mental state to live in comfort and having wild parties. The Yorkists under Duke Richard were the tough guys, hard men of war and were actually more loyal to the house of Lancaster than the Lancasters were at the time ( Henry IV and Henry V). Duke Richard wanted to keep alive the legacy of Henry V but it was too late, England was a fractured nation, France was lost and the War of the Roses broke out. If Duke Richard of York had of been king instead of Henry VI, France today would be a slave of England.

True is neither blue or red but always in between, i do highly recommend you some KZfaq channels like « ARTE » and « Nota Bene » good content with translation in English 😉

​@@naincompetent4438 Nota Bene the leftist ? Certainly not.

English beeing biased on french ? really ?? 🤣🤣

⁠@@afisto6647there is no leftist or rightists history. History is a science. He invites historians and share his sources. Not like some « rightist » who use history for gossips or tot talk arts or architecture like Stephane Bern or Frank Ferrand .

Even more one sided, search the battle of « Patay » (johan of arc was there)

Thanks for watching!

Edward III, the King of England at the onset of the Hundred Years War, is considered by historians to be the first truly English king of the Plantagenet line. After the seige of Calais, Edward stated his wish to repopulate the town with "pure englishmen", and expelled the French. From these words and actions we can infer Edward III did not consider himelf French. As for his nobility - well, the English nobility had not been seen as French since as early as the reigns of Henry II and Richard I, during which tournament records call the English knights English. Many normans considered themselves English since the second generation after the 1066 conquest. Also, Henry IV, Henry V, and Henry VI - the three final English kings of the war - all spoke English as their mother-tongue. The troops which fought on the English side during the war were, with no question, mostly Anglo-Welsh, and finally, the Kingdom of England is a seperate political entity to the Kingdom of France. From this I think we can conclude that the Hundred Years' War was not a French civil war. As for the fascination with it, well this is the war during which a sense of English nationalism came to be. It produced famous encounters such as the Seige of Orleans and the Battle of Agincourt, and national heroes emerged on both sides - Joan d'Arc and Henry V.

Personally, as an Englishman, I am fascinated by the wars because they are interesting to be sure but also our defeat in them helped to establish a truly English identity once our continental holdings had been finally lost and we forced to look both internally and beyond Europe.

@@sirgoo9962 the English you're talking about, was heavily bastardized by said norman conquerers. Old English has little to do with English of 14th century. English today is the most latinized germanic language in Europe, not by accident. So yes, we can see the beginning of the 100 years war as a civil war, and the end as the final definition of both Kingdoms.

I love the way the Normans in 1066 are totally 100% French and the king of England in 1453 is totally 100% French.

@@thesnoopmeistersnoops5167 I would not say 100% for the king of England in this period, more like between 50 and 70%. The Normans on the opposite were kind of local "French" in 1066 (France wasn't really a thing back then), they were assimilated to local latinized people. King of England in 1453 spoke English (latinized English), not French as first language.

The Anarchy was mostly siege warfare, not what I expected many viewers would find interesting.

@@antorseax9492 siege warfare is also very interesting, a desperate struggle for weeks or months, loads of little movements to try and get the upper hand and a lot of action

@@chezburger1781 You're preaching to the choir - how do you think I knew the Anarchy was largely siege warfare? A lot of viewers won't care for 'loads of little movements', especially over a period of months. God, YT is the only place some people learn history.

@@chezburger1781 I literally explained that I do like siege warfare...

Many, or just you?

Hopefully both!

Thank you very much for the support. So kind of you.

Some French trying to explain the usual why did ww2 hit so hard

Thanks. Yes, indeed, a bit more about Dunois will be mentioned in my upcoming video, the Siege of Orleans.

Thank you very much for the support. So kind of you.

Thank you so much for the support. Very kind of you.