How 3-sided football works

Рет қаралды 1,379,154

10 жыл бұрын

A look inside the strategies and rules of three-team soccer, which has three goals, evolving loyalties and a philosophical origin.
More FIFA Futbol Mundial videos:
• FIFA Futbol Mundial
Subscribe to FIFA on KZfaq to stay updated on daily releases:
kzfaq.info_c...
More videos from FIFA on KZfaq:
/ fifa

Пікірлер: 574

@COOLZZist 8 жыл бұрын

the only thing that didn't happen was how 3-sided football works

@Wawawa60 8 жыл бұрын

true

@CallumThompson_ 6 жыл бұрын

what do you mean, they explained it, its like a normal game but with three nets and the team with the leaste amount of goals scored against them wins

@CallumThompson_ 6 жыл бұрын

im really confused , i just explained how it works, and i get a lecture on socialism ? and your girl? what is this.

@lestahass8849 6 жыл бұрын

callum Thompson 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@ZviadiZviadauriVelox 6 жыл бұрын

3nglish Elusive lol your comment has nothing to do with anything, not even with socialism.

@LetsPLayYesterday 8 жыл бұрын

Mercedes-Benz Productplacement?

@aagg6124 8 жыл бұрын

+LetsPLayYesterday LOLZ, i was just thinking the same :P

@itstqxic_minecraft2522 6 жыл бұрын

LetsPLayYesterday if

@xTechnomaniac 8 жыл бұрын

How 3-sided football works. It doesn't.

@masjaketski5529 6 жыл бұрын

Wot?, if u watch the video then it does

@jaaroAr 8 жыл бұрын

This would be a brilliant way to train well-rounded midfielders especially the defensive aspect.

@Alldressedup100 9 жыл бұрын

I prefer normal football but this might still be fun between friends. Nothing I would watch in a world cup though.

@Hammster69official 8 жыл бұрын

Actually, the first three-way soccer match was televised on October 28, 1978, on the Laff-A-Lympics. I don't recall the exact score, but the Scooby Doobies and Yogi Yahooeys tied for the win over the Really Rottens. True.

@s0rry00 8 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@MiguelDiaz-sy5ir 8 жыл бұрын

I was there go scoobies!

@nicholaspesch5086 8 жыл бұрын

And all of this coming from an indoor soccer fan. You know your soccer (go Wave)

@nefarioustrumpet 8 жыл бұрын

+DallasHammster you're probably wrong.

@nefarioustrumpet 8 жыл бұрын

DallasHammster you're probably wrong.

@johnathan1784 9 жыл бұрын

All I can say is... don't fix it if it ain't broke

@burlhusker 8 жыл бұрын

+Wilson Scientifical (DominatorX) you just made my day

@Bp-rg3oj 8 жыл бұрын

***** no he said the quote wrong, and i corrected him

@Orsan_ 8 жыл бұрын

+johnathan1784 I don't see it as a "fix", but rather an improvement of the original idea, to give it another perspective and (who knows?) maybe a more entertaining and exciting turn to the game (we could play this style when there are 3 teams wanting to play, and we want them all to join the game, so, why not?). An example of this statement are smartphones. The original principle wasn't broken, and after an incredible development, cellphones were made. And with that, eventually someone added the features that now allow us to have such incredible technology in our hands. Say, we still have phones and cellphones, but the improved principle is what made different the whole thing, the whole society. It's kinda exaggerated, but in a certain matter correct.

@GuinessOriginal 8 жыл бұрын

If it's broke I didn't fix it

@jacobfuller1914 7 жыл бұрын

The Guy 😂😂😂

@ZackWelders 8 жыл бұрын

what if two weaker teams gang up on a much stronger team?

@TheAllBlackMan 8 жыл бұрын

+cerealkiller That's kind of the beauty of three-sided football. Alliances can be easily forged in a non-linear game.

@sammakkotonttu 8 жыл бұрын

The rules should then be changed so that every team could only score against the team on their right. Then two teams couldn't team up together.

@Ruminations09 8 жыл бұрын

+Kay Horn The only reason that looks like a problem to you is because you don't understand how this game works. In your senerio, it's not Team C who would get that point, it's Team B. You get points by being scored on, not by scoring goals, so the team with the fewest points wins. - In other words, in your senerio, it doesn't matter that it was a C player who scored, both Team A and Team C are helped by that goal.

@Ruminations09 8 жыл бұрын

Kay Horn "1 team is either doing nothing because they are leading, and the losing team will just get bullied til the end of the game." - That's literally the opposite of what would happen. It only takes a basic understanding of strategy to realize that the two losing teams would team up to take on the winning team.

@Ruminations09 8 жыл бұрын

Kay Horn Is it possible for you make a comment without mindlessly insulting me? Is it possible for us to just have a mature disscusssion about this? Is that a thing you're capable of? - Anyway: no. The team in second place should NOT team up with the winning team. By teaming up with the losing team, the second place team will be able to dethrone the winning team. - If you're in second and you team up with the winning team, you're just helping your opponent win. It's literally the dumbest play you can make. - Let me break down who you should team up with: Team A is winning Team B is in second Team C is losing - Team A would, ideally, want to team up with Team C to extend their lead over B. - Team B would, ideally, want to team up with Team C to catch up with Team A. - Team C has a choice: do they want to improve their chances of taking second, or do they want to make the game more even all around making it easier for them to eventually take first, but less likely to quickly take second. If the former, then they'd want to team up with A, if the later then they'd want to team up with B. - If A and B are tied: Both A and B want to team up with C, and C's choice is very situational. - If B and C are tied: B and C should team up to make sure A doesn't run away with the game. A would settle for an alliance with either team. - If everyone is tied: Very situational and there's no way to answer who should team up with who without knowing anything else about the game.

@cillianbrouder 6 жыл бұрын

I'd love for this to become a proper professional sport. Even if it becomes one of those smaller sports that you'd watch at the Olympics and forget about after

@MrCmon113 10 жыл бұрын

This won't work. In three sided games the weakest team will always be struck down be the combined powers of the two others. It's just bad game design.

@amapolishplummer 9 жыл бұрын

The team who concedes the least wins, so you need to somehow which allegiances half way through.

@amapolishplummer 9 жыл бұрын

Chad Nitrofix Yeah but during the game you'd need to score against the other strong game to win.

@Chadnitrofix69 9 жыл бұрын

amapolishplummer , I see your point. Sure, I agree that it is a fun game to play with friends and there will be mindgames near the end of the play to make it exciting , what my claim is that, it is just plain unfair for one team even when they possess a quality squad. The game could be twisted to unfavourable conditions for one team even if they have the strongest players. They would lack the man power to come against the allied teams, it is just plain unfair for a team with better players to lose for the terms of the game. Like you said, to win it could be a fair contest, but to lose one of the teams could get slammed anytime no matter what skills they have thus making the game a two team contest. If you like I'd like to present a scenario: Argentina, Spain and Italy are playing the game. And Spain and Italy could join forces and trash Argentina from the beginning and make the score Arg(-6)Spn(0)Italy(0) at halftime, and then as the latter half develops its just a contest between Italy and Spain, leaving Argentina with no hope. The game could be played with equality only by the will of all players which is impossible in terms of real life. Its just not professional sports, may be for reality tv, but not professional sports.

@MrCmon113 9 жыл бұрын

I should look into the rules of this again. ^^ Very nice replies. I of course simplified it carelessly in my first comment.

@AndorianBlues 9 жыл бұрын

Taxtro Why would that be in the interest of the two other teams? The team who *concedes* the least goals wins, so it is in either of the two stronger teams' interest to betray their allied team after a goal is scored against the weaker team. Otherwise the game would lead only to a draw for the two strongest teams. Knowing that one of the two stronger teams will attempt a betrayal, the third team could attempt to curry favour by promising an alliance with one of the two stronger teams when the betrayal occurs. However an alliance also puts them in a good position for their own betrayal. It can get quite complex.

@kumakamu9304 7 жыл бұрын

"Who needs Europe?" Said an Englishman

@SirEEf13 6 жыл бұрын

He said "Who needs Brazil?".......but I get what you wanna say. xD

@djprojectus 5 жыл бұрын

KumaKamu The world needs Europe!

@vladb420 5 жыл бұрын

Farage?

@ishthefish9006 5 жыл бұрын

Djprojectus nah not really

@VStrizzy 8 жыл бұрын

This belongs on a playground and not a stadium

@busTedOaS 8 жыл бұрын

+VStrizzy why? because you dont like it?

@VStrizzy 8 жыл бұрын

It's because I do like it and I don't want to go to Europe to play such a fun playground game

@davekent6023 8 жыл бұрын

+busTedOaS then you go play it. want a medal for being open minded?

@busTedOaS 8 жыл бұрын

Dave Kent nah im good, I just don't like people proclaiming where something "belongs".

@marcorodriguez5523 7 жыл бұрын

This seems stupid I prefer running having more than 5 team mates and passion in soccer not this crap

@paulmrussell12 10 жыл бұрын

Five things I want to see tried: 5. Massive double sized pitch, 22 a-side! Epic battles to advance up-field! I imagine players like Bale would be a huge asset! 4. Normal 11 a-side but with 2 balls in play at one time. You can be defending and attacking simultaneously, tricky for TV coverage! You would need to have one ref that follows each ball, each ball would be a different colour. Imagine if they had it in the 90's, you could have had Beckham lining up a free kick at one end, whilst somewhere else on the pitch Keane is getting sent off for stamping on a guy, you wouldn't know where to look! You might even have a situation where both sides score simultaneously with home and away fans all celebrating! Trippy shit. 3. No goal keepers but smaller goals and you've got to shoot from outside the box, still high scoring! You might have to make a circular or round ended box rather than square! 2. Regular 11 a-side but on a circular pitch, offside's would be hard to adjudicate! Or you could use a cricket oval, you might need again more than 11 a side! 1. Or most ambitious, eight sided pitch, 4 goals evenly spaced, 2 teams, lights above each goal, 2 lights off, one on... red, one on blue, your team have to target a certain colour, they change at random, you might be advancing in on goal and suddenly it becomes the one you are defending and your goal keepers is miles out of position! OK that is too far, might not work!

@sudocreme5080 8 жыл бұрын

I've played with the small net- no shooting inside box game. It was good fun. Really improves accuracy.

@justsomeguy2743 6 жыл бұрын

paulmrussell12 all fun but not entertaining to watch on the television, like rugby it's boring to watch but hella fun to play

@dominikmatic4032 5 жыл бұрын

paulmrussell12 combine 5 4 and 1

@enes4999 5 жыл бұрын

dominik matić how are you gonna combine them may I ask?

@dominikmatic4032 5 жыл бұрын

Enes Kücükakin 44 players 2 balls and goal switching

@DarrenTrills 10 жыл бұрын

im from malaysia but ive never heard of 3 sided football before and now they're telling me we're entering the world cup? meh, thats probably the only world cup that we're qualified to join.

@muhdpeep 6 жыл бұрын

DarrenTrills standard melayu

@pizzahater6081 6 жыл бұрын

DarrenTrills Same with Bulgaria From 94 to now

@harisrazmi6035 5 жыл бұрын

Melayu La Ni

@damaster720 8 жыл бұрын

The comments here typifies the stupidity of the KZfaq community. There's no way three-sided football is going to replace conventional football. It's just a very fun, new, much more tactical way of playing football. Calm down, they won't replace anything.

@maqil3623 5 жыл бұрын

Fun but not for competitive sports, I think. It will be hard to have the winner and I think it will involve grudge against the other team to decide which team they should attack.

@albertmathenge1025 10 жыл бұрын

We were playing a four sided version of this in the streets of Nairobi back when I was a kid. We had four goals and four players. Concede a goal and your out and another player comes in...

@greenbaycity 6 жыл бұрын

Albert Mathenge habari za azubuhi

@Benswan187 10 жыл бұрын

A good training exercise and fun but nothing more

@ICE1800 6 жыл бұрын

Benswan187 what more fo you need

@dubididubidi 8 жыл бұрын

that would be better with only player per team and a really little field...or maximum 2 players per team... with that giant field and so many player it's just a big mess...

@derfinsniter5185 6 жыл бұрын

dubididubidi that would be bad cause you had to choose whether or not to go on offense or stay defensive, if you if A and B where attacking C than B went rouge and just shot it into A's goal than A would be punished for attacking

@willzuh8621 8 жыл бұрын

This idea isn't going anywhere. It's stupid. Football will always be the same basic idea.

@willzuh8621 8 жыл бұрын

Com Lag I am. >:)

@busTedOaS 8 жыл бұрын

+Epic Will (SnakeSkinGaming) well its not like we have to choose one...

@sudocreme5080 8 жыл бұрын

Are you dumb? This isn't suppose to replace normal football it's just s variation. You don't see anyone complaining about beach football or football tennis. Really, how dense can you be?

@ombolobmo 8 жыл бұрын

+Epic Will (SnakeSkinGaming) "Football will always be the same basic idea." This is not Football, it's 3-sided Football. Do you get the difference?

@GuinessOriginal 8 жыл бұрын

Tell that to FIFA

@jake-mn2ns 8 жыл бұрын

this is a cool concept, not saying it should replace regular soccer but its like how in basketball there are games like horse, knockout, around the world, 21, etc, should just be played amongst friends pretty much like different variations of basketball

@NelsenGChess 8 жыл бұрын

I agree, this should be a thing like futsal and beach soccer, but it's not replacing normal football

@HH-un6rk 8 жыл бұрын

It should be on a playground

@kamal777VVV 5 жыл бұрын

When I was a child I saw 4 sided football in my dream, I never thought it would be a thing it was like 2 football fields next to each other and teams had to score in the oppsed direction and the far goal like the letter x (Thank you for reading and sorry for my english )

@guiguipsp 9 жыл бұрын

Mercedes Benz like that.

@molodo-zeleno7176 9 жыл бұрын

In my opinion, This game is not interesting to watch on TV

@molodo-zeleno7176 9 жыл бұрын

I've seen this video. It is more than enough.

@batminecrafter13 8 жыл бұрын

Would be fun as hell to play though.

@breakaleg1 3 жыл бұрын

With the addition of the UEFA Europa Conference League, the 2021/22 UEFA Super Cup will be played like this 👍

@VodkaHellstorm 8 жыл бұрын

They were experimenting with 3-sided Aussie Rules in Melbourne, Australia a few years ago too.

@alternatehistorysports 8 жыл бұрын

You know what would be cool, is a football match in a concave bowl-shaped pitch. The goals would have to be at an angle facing downwards.

@traumanation233 8 жыл бұрын

It would be cool if this wer like special games, like if the Méxican Super Clásico would be Cruz Azul vs. América vs. Chivas. Or maybe 4-way, that way Pumas could also be a part. But only for special occasions like that, but not for every game. I like the traditional games we have today.

@AerographicWings 7 жыл бұрын

You can do some changes in rules such as bigger goals and 2 goalkeepers from different teams on each goal. Your team must score only in one goal (with 2 enemy GK). For example. It'll bring more balance in game.

@cillianbrouder 6 жыл бұрын

Imagine a professional three sided football match that has Liverpool and Man Utd players coordinating together against another team

@jebronlames4559 5 жыл бұрын

Next up: Fifa:Battle Royale

@musicalneptunian 5 жыл бұрын

There used to be a training exercise game a bit similar. But between individuals. Each person would defend a goal made of two sticks. Those goals would form a circle in which they played.

@wayysound 8 жыл бұрын

lol i play four-sided football at school. it's called Four Corners. like if you remember

@lastingnumber1668 8 жыл бұрын

Lol me too!! :)

@Azrael442 7 жыл бұрын

haha yeah, we simply called it four goals - only allowed 2 touches of the ball to make it interesting

@eliad6543 6 жыл бұрын

We're doing one-sided: 2 teams 5 players each 1 goal Goalkeeper who isnt playing for any team and he has to just stop the balls (hes also the ref sometimes) The team that scores the most into the goal wins, game is 35 minutes long. A deflected goal can count for the other team, and also, its more interesting in a way, because if you attack and you lost the ball, you dont run back to your goal, you start defending the same goal you were attacking before. Its an easy way of getting a ref into an unorganized game at school. Theres only 2 positions: Playmaker and Striker (strikers are also defenders if the team loses the ball). It developed here after we were only 7th grade, and the other older guys took every other place on every "pitch", so we couldnt play on 2 goals. 2 sided football is more fun, but when you dont have enough players, really need a ref, have only 1 goal, or just want to differenciate and mix thing up a bit, that's the perfect option for you, as its more resource - light than 3 sided football.

@joshuaryan7038 6 жыл бұрын

Eliad Eyar Even better: One goal, neutral keeper, every man for himself

@eliad6543 6 жыл бұрын

Joshua Ryan yeah but everyone does that :D

@Smittel 6 жыл бұрын

3 sided football: longer tradition than RB Leipzig

@mancity605 6 жыл бұрын

we play this at my clubs practices sometimes, and we use three balls it's mental and so much fun

@christian8933 9 жыл бұрын

This looks really fun!

@getmeto100subscriberswithn2 6 жыл бұрын

Random Guy On KZfaq no

@jamie4278 8 жыл бұрын

It's just great banter

@ManasGupta_mag 7 жыл бұрын

the video title is completely misleading, the only thing they didn't explain was how 3-sided football work.

@inhdungvu2746 5 жыл бұрын

didn’t they? :D

@vonfaahquard8532 6 жыл бұрын

id love to give this a try

@IkarusB007 6 жыл бұрын

The team with the least goals conceded wins. So everytime one has fewer than the others, they gang up on him until its equal again. Boring

@adriannngp2012 10 жыл бұрын

i would love to play on this dynamic!!

@-guitarhero 6 жыл бұрын

I thought of this concept when I was 7 years old, Now I'm 14. I thought that the pitch should have a 1.5 times larger area, but a circle, and the goals should be kept 1/3 of the pitch apart from each other.

@Woussie 5 жыл бұрын

This idea is one of the best things I've ever heard about football!

@wschin2108 5 жыл бұрын

There's a saying, 'If it ain't broken, don't fix it.' Football played the way it's played between 2 sides (the traditional way) is just perfect and that's how we like it. So no reason to come up with a strange and somewhat weird 3 sided football (although I must say the guy who came up with the 3 sided football does have an imaginative mind).

@gui18bif 9 жыл бұрын

Played it the other day it was great

@jonnycono6995 6 жыл бұрын

I reckon it needs to be played indoors or on a turf with walls so that there are no outs. It's a decent idea though and I love the organised chaos.

@Santiago-eq6zb 5 жыл бұрын

It shouldn't be fewest goals conceded or most scored, but goal differential, each team's goals scored minus goals conceded. That way teams don't gang up on another team or teams don't play all defense.

@ahtartersauce101 8 жыл бұрын

4-way, 2-ball, square pitch s is better with scoring the most goals AND having hockey-offsides rules on the territory boundaries.

@Alexeyeyeyey99 10 жыл бұрын

Should try this idea in Finland really.

@johannesderspinner 6 жыл бұрын

4:03 Talks about big business in football on FIFA TV. What a guy :D

@heer-e7074 8 жыл бұрын

cool concept

@QazwerDave 9 ай бұрын

I wanna see a match !!

@SamuelGarciaPerez1998 10 жыл бұрын

very cool

@davekent6023 6 жыл бұрын

*The team that concedes the fewest goals wins* Here's the recipe for success then: a team that parks the bus and has players with strong shots. Coming up on FIFA TV: Fire Football. Just like football, only it's played with a ball that's on fire. Also, handballs allowed.

@TSMK900 9 жыл бұрын

Maybe 3-sided football can be like Futsal in that it will help the players to develop thier skill and well,help them become better players in normal football.

@buddymacbuddington 4 жыл бұрын

I'd love to see this become more popular have professional teams play and be televised

@etjlazlo 8 жыл бұрын

Can't believe people here think this is supposed to replace the current sport or something. This concept is great to teach football though: it helps players to learn about different situations and be aware of the ball, team and opponents at the same time. So, don't be naive and expect this to be an actual sport. It just a variation of the original one.

@Jolgeable 10 жыл бұрын

We need to try this here in Brazil. I imagine how the strategy should be so different. Please, where can we find a tutorial of the rules?

@fabriziorava5170 5 жыл бұрын

Cool exercise

@TheGreenCouncil 5 жыл бұрын

FIFA TV is the only place that has only their videos in the suggestions

@CapeBone 9 жыл бұрын

CONCEPT: In a tournament of normal football, if there is a tie after over time, then there is a penalty shoot out. SCENARIO: Suppose there is a game with teams A, B, and C. At the end of overtime A has conceded one goal, B and C have not conceded. QUESTION: What happens then? Is there a penalty shoot out between B and C? Is there some form of a three-way shoot out? Does it depend on what team scored the goal? Or another way of breaking a tie?

@RacingAtHome 8 жыл бұрын

Solomon Capetillo I assume B and C would be penalties or there would be another way. Elimination?

@penkatadrums 8 жыл бұрын

Solomon Capetillo It doesn't make sense to play until there is a winner, makes more sense to play until there is a loser. So in your case team A will be eliminated and B and C will both advance. Is there only one winner out of the 3 teams?

@manuelsousa 5 жыл бұрын

That would be a great way to train three goalkeepers and do a good training for a big match.

@TheVoiceOfLiberty1 3 жыл бұрын

I always thought was the only genius that imagined about 3 sided football

@kangdayuna Жыл бұрын

Can't wait to see in UEFA SUPER CUP 2022

@aledoessomething3722 Жыл бұрын

The true way to do the super cup

@Shivam-iw6oo 5 жыл бұрын

one word : Chaos

@divinest 5 жыл бұрын

I played this game when i was a kid. and i've never heard of this dude before

@KA-eu9sy Жыл бұрын

Mercedes - Benz would be the perfect sponsor. 0:10

@gianpaoloabagnale2564 7 жыл бұрын

good idea

@KratosAurionPlays 8 жыл бұрын

It's an interesting idea.

@lachlanculligan3265 6 жыл бұрын

Im from glasgow!

@warrenmcgreevy4590 6 жыл бұрын

I would love Copa90 to do a video on 3 sided football

@NicholasMunge 10 ай бұрын

Berkamp was the player of the tournament for me

@grayd98 6 жыл бұрын

I think this is a cool concept. Too many people are set in their ways and refuse to acknowledge anything else.

@troubauk 6 жыл бұрын

Oh those situationists!

@Knightfire66 5 жыл бұрын

i would definitely play that game...

@deanc2000 5 жыл бұрын

Just pick the weakest defense and pummel them. This is what I would do. The more sides you have, 4, 5, 6 sides, the more defenses you have to pick from. The weakest defense will be attacked the most. Subsequently, what you could do is when say a certain number of goals are scored on a team, then they are kicked out. The last team standing is the winner.

@flymb3358 6 жыл бұрын

This could be more fun to watch than normal football

@shiningbanana693 5 жыл бұрын

2018 first time hearing of this

@augustusulmst148 6 жыл бұрын

In the beginning when the score board changes it gives red a point yet red was scored on

@ChaoticCobraR6 10 жыл бұрын

Thats pretty cool

@collinsacheampong9379 6 жыл бұрын

In Ghana, we have 4 sided football... We call it 4 corners.. It's pretty great

@tobymartin2137 6 жыл бұрын

Damn, this has the potential to make me interested in football...

@Lord_Skeptic Жыл бұрын

Could do 4 sided football. Sorts out a group stage in one go.

@Lord_Skeptic Жыл бұрын

Or 48 sided football. Sorts out the entire world cup in one go. Joke.

@yusuf-5531 6 жыл бұрын

mourinho would love this. Just imagine it: a 0-0-0 draw between man utd, Stoke and West Bromwich

@stevethepirate0011 8 жыл бұрын

No offsides? Fantastic! Finally, a version of Soccer I can get behind!

@thetoad7367 4 жыл бұрын

Ryan Woods what is soccer?

@erblinbeqa6550 5 жыл бұрын

This is amaizin'

@play_sports_and_read_books 6 жыл бұрын

so 2 teams can team up on the third and at last it will come back to 2 on 2 since both of them might have 0 goals in them which will make the game even longer

@doraemon402 6 жыл бұрын

The problem is that if the winner is the team which conceds less goals, every one would play defensively, and if there's a draw between two of the teams, what do they do?

@scappley1735 5 жыл бұрын

Awesome

@asbjrnc7877 6 жыл бұрын

Im danish as well!!!

@KokaVashakidze 10 жыл бұрын

how it comes that the video has 91 views and 120 likes? great video anyway

@Chriskayn 5 жыл бұрын

To be honest it looks fun only IF you play it with 2 balls, because with 2 balls theres always action on all sides, whereas with 1 ball theres only action on 2, and therefore is not a 3 sided football at all

@ThaStam 5 жыл бұрын

you know...in our world...if three sided football was professional, some teams would pay one of the rest two in a match and they would play as teammates against the third team...

@AbdullahRady 6 жыл бұрын

Well, for people who say this won't work, eventhough I don't like it, I would like to say that this was mentioned about many innovative ideas which didn't seem to be of importance, but guess what, they worked. When the TV remote control was invented, it was said that why the hell will people need a remote control to change the channel?! this idea won't go anywhere. Try to imagine if a salesman tells you these days to buy a TV that doesn't support remote controls, you will say that he is crazy. Don't judge the idea by how it seems to you right now, because even in sports you will find that some of them looked really stupid at the beginning. I remember once when I was talking to people who didn't know about the American football, and when someone explained how it works, they said that the idea is stupid, and it won't work! they didn't know that it is one of the famous sports in USA. There are many examples, actually, but just don't compare the idea with what football is right now, as it will be totally different. Different strategies, tactics and rules. My personal opinion that this idea can be interesting in a small court with small teams, such as 2 players in each team and small goals. Something like street football or beach volleyball.