NAILED IT!!

Yeah...a lot of that goes on in the US. Pharmaceutical companies comes to mind

If you had a bet on it, I don't think you would ever lose.

Oh but didn't notice that "the good guys" have television shows? Didn't you notice that "the really good guys" run foundations?

@@arcanondrum6543you mean they run “tax havens” 😂

What a great line. Kinda sums everything up right there

That wouldn't be capitalism...what would be a proper name for it? (Just asking)

@@JusticeAlways you're an MM2?? Nuclear or conventional? what ship? Active??

@@JusticeAlways I guess for me I don't mind the idea of wealth per se, I suppose it's human nature that some people will be very attached to the idea of making money, some people are in love with money, I don't think that's healthy but that is certainly part of our reality, but if everything is profited to the max, people lose. Removing the excessive profit motive on many things is important. So at a minimum expanding the not-for-profit sector is vital. That's where I start. Providing a public alternative to every need and some wants is what I want to see.

​@@JusticeAlwayscapitalism meaning has become capitalizing on others at their expense so anything anyone can get away with has become capitalism it's what happens when it's not controlled and runs rampant. It could be controlled by providing business loans by the government and limiting business size but that hasn't happened

Red cocaine

They generally dont know the laws they uphold, this shouldn't be that surprising lol.

That's why apps that upload video in real time to the cloud are important. They can seize and 'accidentally' erase all they want, you or your lawyer will still be able to access it.

💯

Actually no they can seize cameras, in this situation, the officer explains if they find an illegal catch they can seize the cameras because they likely recorded the catch making it evidence to a crime. One of the exception to warrants if the officer has concerns that evidence can be destroyed. Hence it it completely legal to seize the cameras IF they find an illegal catch however I am not sure if they need a warrant to go through the cameras as I know they if an officer seize a car and finds a locked box a warrant needs to issued to go through the box even if they had a warrant to search the car.

​@Heavenly_Fury absolutely not. They have no idea if anything was caught on camera or not. They wanted to illegally seize the camera.In hopes that there was evidence that can later be used to prosecute. They needed a warrant at this point. Hunches and hope alone do not allow you to seize anything. And no judge would allow warren to be issued based on the evidence in this video.

God tell me about it. Will the feudalism never end???? Good god... Can't even escape the landlords by jumping into the ocean now

Wailords ftw

More like PIRATES

I thought the water tribe was the chill ones.

This just in, Oil lobyists have told us that selling the atmosphere to big oil is the best way to prevent global warming.

BULL$HIT

yep, privatization ruins everything.

Not to make light of the situation, but when I read this, I imagined your lines in Gilbert Gottfried's voice, particularly of him on Hollywood Squares.

Strange how unchecked capitalism always seems to ruin everything

Exactly!

Dude , so succinct , so well stated

That's why ppl gotta be aware of where their "rights" cone from. These are at best, privileges

​@@tredwayjack5189fishing is a privilege, especially commercial fishing. We ended commercial hunting a century ago.

You lose all of the rights you refuse to defend.

@@Steve-ev6vxah yes, working to provide for your self is a privilege Wonder how many people considered it a privilege 500 years ago

@@minotaurmikeftwmike7712 I am just saying how the US government views it, not how it should be. You can't do it without a license.

And any time two people meet to discuss business, it ends in a conspiracy against the public

Not for profit, lobby groups. Uncle Bill’s salary $500 k , Aunt Kitty $$400k but we are Not For Profit doing good for the world.

facts

Unless they are pro 2A lobbyists

Rmiller It’s a pretty screwed up world where you actually need 2a lobbying. In a perfect rational world rights protected by the constitution would be like protected haha. Just look at the patriot act and all the constitutional rights that were basically destroyed because ya know goat terrorists mean we must destroy American rights to save a few American lives meanwhile strengthening the federal government making it much much more dangerous than previously mentioned goat terrorist. It’s like some say oh Putin is so dangerous. It’s like no. Biden with dementia, or congress etc is much much more dangerous to me because they literally run the country I’m in.

Like all of corporate America? One more industry privatized then you get to use others. Privatized utilities chap my butt too. Alaskan girl here watching it play big time in our fishing industry. Look at farming tho, how long ago did the share cropping scam reign?

Just part of our march back into feudalism.

@@mamatrain100 Glad you see the truth love, most are blindsided. Cheers from Ohio.

That's neoliberalism. That's all it is.

i was just watching a video about land value taxes, kinda crazy there are ocean landlords too

Oh wow now you understand how every American feels ever

Same thing with the farmers and artists, government doesn't care, you need to unionize somehow and sue these ghouls

Really had to add the race part, didn't ya's???? Couldn't have said I'm a female boat owner who's struggling right now. Sayin, you're a "female Hispanic boat owner" just makes you bad cause no one cares about what race you are.

​@@GamingPandaCatunions are just job landlords, they lost all of their effectiveness long ago and are just another non-working group of people (union reps, etc) living off of the labor of actual workers (union members). Ive been in several over the last 20 years and was always treated worse in union shops than non-union shops

I’m a meat cutter. Our union does not work for us anymore. They’re paid for by the companies.

Damn. That makes indescribably 😢! Lord I didn't know any of this! But I can tell you just from simply trying to go catch a fish or a crab, they show up. They're not nice. They rummage through everything and make you feel like a criminal. They disturbed your peace. When they are done with you you feel like you have been violated and that there's nothing you can do about it. So yeah it shows up at the docks, on the banks, and a kayak, in a boat. I knew there was something bigger going on I just had no idea!

Capitalism working as intended.....

@@fkrkf this isn’t capitalism. This is oligarchy.

@@bigrich6750 No it's capitalism. Oligarchs love capitalism; they're the ones who have the capital to 'win' at it.

@@wasd____ oligarchy is not capitalism, and no one owns the natural resources. They should be controlled to avoid overfishing, but control is not ownership. The catch share is more communistic than capitalistic. To pay someone to harvest something they don’t own is not just an injustice - it is evil.

@@bigrich6750 No it's still capitalism.

Agree

I just recently started watching their videos and this same thought crossed my mind.

Nobody with power cares yet, but they're still doing a good job.

People want to eat fish though. I say let the government do the leasing instead and use the revenue to fund conservation efforts

correct.

That would only force them to set up an actual company with workers with a minimum-wage fishing it for them. Meaning they still get to sit in their share, but earn even more money than before (because now they get all the fish profits themselves for only the cost of hiring some ppl and buying some boats). Who cares about high turnover-rates? They can just hire new ppl, and if that takes some time it doesn't matter as it seems those shares are still small enough that even one guy can fish his entire quota of 2% with a single boat. So there is no rush. Hell, even if they don't finish their quota, there's no punishment to the share-holder besides some lost possible profit - and like new york real estate standing empty for years it is still better for them to artificially inflate prices by keeping the shares themselves, than to maximize their profit in the short term. _Maybe_ your idea would work if there was a fine for _vastly_ under-utilizing the quota without good reason (surely will exists good reasons at times, so best to have that safeguard. but any such excuse would be investigated and vetted), but even then all that leads to is slightly higher wages for the employees if they get off their asses and make a union so they can go on strike. Still keeps the shares with the ones who already have them, because selling them is stupid.

​@@feha92a year on year location would go some way to fixing that. If you don't fulfill your quota one year, you lose that portion the next year. Bias new and redistributed allocations to new entities. If companies treat thier employees poorly, they will under perform. Big snag is situations where a small outfit (single boat) suffers breakdowns or illness.

@@feha92 nonody is going to fish for minimum wage and it would be pretty illegal and not hold up in court. Hazard pay and all.

Most states rightly recognize hunting, fishing, and trapping as constitutional rights, but then charge a fee for those 'rights' (like with gun permits too). And apparently some are going a step further still by privatizing the regulation of those rights.

In Michigan, Granholm authorized the licensing of water pumping from the great lakes. Nestle paid $250 for their license then promptly lobbied to have it privatized, specifically so no one else could pump water out.

The problem isn’t strict regulations, but HOW it’s done! It’s possible to have a catch-share system that give a guy like this a decent living! There’s also ways to use nets that doesn’t destroy seabeds - and the sizes of holes in the nets can help decrease unwanted bicatch!

No one uses drag nets for red snapper...... IT'S ILLEGAL. Try again, but next time try harder

@@willbass2869you would genuinely be shocked with what people get away with on the open seas (particularly in The Gulf) It’s like The Wild West on the ocean.

​@@willbass2869illegal is negotiable. Just not for us.

@@Lylaris_or_GarukThis right here. Small fry fishers get policed to hell, but Big Business of any type always have ways to skirt the law

To keep people slaves to greedy corporations for food.

It's a protection racket for the rich so they can profit while the poor starve.

Some limitation has to happen or all the snapper disappear, as they were rapidly disappearing when this system was instituted. What would you do?

@@TrogdorBurnin8or were they truly at risk of being overfished?? Okay for sake of argument let's presume they were. In that case then I would try to make it as fair as possible and give everyone a maximum individual quota that's equal for everyone. Large commercial trawlers should also be limited or banned if stock is believed to be at risk. Certainly there shouldn't be any fees just to access the water though. They already pay their fee for their commercial fishing license so why isn't that enough?

Look at the graph in the video man. They were in catastrophic decline! We were more than a decade beyond maximum harvest and into exponential decay as the last fish died off. Arguably we should still ban fishing of these species entirely until they can make a recovery. You can limit catch in all sorta of ways; I prefer auctioning off catch permits annually, but in this case we've enlisted the private sector to do that. The way we did it in the 90's was to push people to catch as much as possible in an ever-shrinking number of days, and this didn't work very well and was extremely dangerous. The fee for the commercial fishing license right now is trivial compared to the price necessary to reduce harvest. There are no fees to "access the water". There are fees to catch Red Snapper (in the sense that a private entity holds the rights and will sell/loan them to you), and this is the enforcement mechanism to ensure that those fees were paid (that you have bought rights to catch those fish).@@YourCapyBruv_do_u_rmbr_3Dpipes

I and every citizen should have the same identical "rights / ownership" don't you think? That slices the parcels to very tiny portions...and make it impossible for just a few to gain control. (Just my thoughts)

The lack of monopoly concerns would be a feature of an annual government auction. I don't see how the rights to 0.02 pounds of Red Snapper per US resident per year would be practical to distribute.@@JusticeAlways

This is the crucial flaw of hyper-capitalistic policy. When the long term debt cycle nears its end, the bubbles become so large they suffocate. We did away with all the regulation over the previous decades as they seemed the logical solution to stopping other, smaller bubbles from bursting. We kick the can down the road for generations, until the bubbles burst. Capitalism makes us wealthy and gives us the quality of life we have today, but this is what happens when the concept is not managed well. When pragmatism is overshadowed by greed and reductive ideas like 'freedom' and 'liberty' which can be interpreted in oh so many convenient ways.

What kind of super rare lobster is that? I can still get it under $10 here in Houston, TX @ HEB.

I know a guy who catches seafood on a commercial license in Florida. Fish prices skyrocketed in the last couple years. His salary: stayed exactly the same. It’s a full blown scam. They literally just steal profits from the people who actually do the work.

You were on the right path until you called liberty and freedom "reductive." Corporations don't deserve the same levels of freedom as individuals... don't confuse personal liberty with corporate overreach.

Yep, it's a meeting of corporate and government power. ......fascism......and its coming from The Left as was predicted in the 1960s when people knew that fascism is leftist totalitarianism. Just look up MalcolmX & the Black Panthers and who they said were the fascists

You do realize the aftermath, right?

​@@ProfAzimov worth it

We really should and we have the guns to do so but we're still arguing over ideologies

Itd be so funny if he was like "oh yea the aftermath, i forgot about that, nevermind then."...

@@kingkazuma2239according to plan

just like houses, companies shouldn't be able to own them at all. individuals only.

Decentralization is always the answer

And then what? Now the small fishermen have exclusive rights, giving them a monopoly. Effectively barring anyone else from fishing and making them the biggest operations. Do we just recursively take fishing rights away, endlessly, until the heat death of the universe?

@@Telmach tha-thats not what a monopoly is... A thousand small fishermen having a certain quota they can fish to is better than some dude sitting back and collecting money off of 1000 fishermen

@@roscojenkins7451 Okay, and what happens when those '1000 fishermen' decide to retire? Do we allow them to sell their fishing rights then? Or do you prose that the federal government which "misplaces" $2 Trillion a year manages the fish with their superior accounting abilities?

If you give them another year they will grow another four inches.

It's almost as if feudalism never ended... As if the kings and queens of old never went away but simply rebranded themselves as "capitalists" and continued business as usual 🤔 I mean sure, a few new families get to join the exclusive .01% club, but still feels like it's all one giant sham...

Who's going to confiscate it? Do you really believe that any one would share their money with you? Do your family members share their money with you, no strings attached? No.? How much of your money do you share with strangers? Why? Because they'll take advantage....and you'd get nothing out of it. Same idea. $$$$ "IT'S ALL MINE!!!" $$$$$$ BAWAAHAHAA!

Agreed! To force a majority of your workforce to apply for government welfare because you refuse to pay a living wage should eliminate your ability to profit. Honestly stores like these should have government competition, so we could have a chance at controlling the prices and securing a sense of security.

@@judylandry302 (abc) you ok there??? Obviously this is something that's unlikely to happen in our lifetime but yes under certain circumstances I would certainly support the confiscation of excessive private wealth and the redistribution along lower income lines. Will it happen? Almost certainly not, but what I would support it? Uh yeah. And I'm not even against wealth per se but I am against excessive wealth and I'm def against Walmart, that fkg cancer of a megastore chain that has put half of the country out of business and makes untold zillions yet has scumbag floorwalkers literally run after desperate homeless people or poor people taking formula or basics home to their babies (or themselves).

2% is too generous.

Where do you teach ?

I blame the unions.

Unfortunately corporate dominance seems to be the cancer in every industry. I'm sure bike shops are no exception. One solution is for local county supervisors to limit corporate expansion within their jurisdiction. But will they? I highly doubt it. God they suck so hard

The gigantism of everything will eventually be our downfall. Giant corps and giant government.

What is privatized exactly?

Huh? I think you have it backwards. Only big companies can survive Covid, workers don’t make enough to live

@@KZfaqcensoredmyusernamethat's because big companies get bailed out by our tax dollars, they need workers or they die.

It’s not privatization, it’s government collusion with the rich to turn us back into serfs. We own nothing and they rent it to us, and we work for them and they jack the rent and cut our pay. Since at least Mesopotamia it has been this way..

@@ChrisWijtmansprivate ownership of fishing rights as opposed to government regulation. It is another chip out of our freedom. Selling us to the rich and powerful. You own nothing, have no rights and must work for and pay the elite for your daily bread. Nice little trap…serfdom, slavery?

Uber fish

Care to guess why it’s absolutely necessary to have a limited number of licenses for taxi cabs? Because otherwise it becomes hard to make a living! If you live in a city that can sustain let’s say 200 licences - and all make a living - what do you think will happen if a large company that can afford losing money for a longer period of time then add 200-300 cars? Remember that fish for consumers market are in high risk of overfishing - so it need to be regulated! However, there are other ways to regulate it, that benefits smaller single owner vessels and larger co-op vessels! Just as it can be done in the cab business by limiting the numbers of licences a single company can own!

@@gorillaguerillaDK I get that to a point. But I saw the same problem happen with the taxi cab industry. It became super expensive to buy one of the limited licenses. But Uber and Lyft destroyed that whole system anyway. I can see why Taxi people were upset. And I u sweat and the need for conservation. If taken care of, fish are literally a renewable resource; they make more of themselves. But this method just seems ripe for corruption, consolidation, and exploitation.

@@mediabreakdown8963 That's why some countries, such as mine, don't allow Uber or any similar services. And licenses for cabs are kept at a fair price. Unfortunately overfishing really is a thing - and combined with climate change it puts a lot of pressure on some of the very popular consume fish. Here, in my neck of the wood, we have issues with both. Climate change causes temperatures to change and some fish are very sensitive to even relative small changes. We also have to deal with combinations of climate change and environmental factors, especially in coast near fishing where lack of oxygen basically kills everything. Add to this, not all fish can just migrate and thrive - aside from temperature they're used to different levels of salt saturation. In the Baltic Sea the average is around 0.8%, in Kattegat, (straight between the Baltic Sea and the Atlantic Ocean), its 2%, and as you go from Kattegat to Skagerrak and into the North Sea, (Atlantic Ocean), it rises to 3.3% Fish only replenish if they're having the right conditions for it, and if there's enough of them. And people are greedy and we constantly have to keep an eye with fishing vessels that breaks the laws, both in regards to where they're allowed to fish, and in regards to when they catch more than they're allowed to - or species they're not allowed to catch!

​@@mediabreakdown8963fish are renewable until you drive them to extinction

Agreed. That appears to be a mistake in the video. Both systems described in the video are managed systems. No unmanaged system where a Tragedy of the Commons would take place is even discussed.

You are right. She is wrong.

Not really, but a better solution is definitely needed.

You call it "corruption". I call it "Capitalism" because it been made "legal" by the ones with the most money so they can make even MORE money. Funny how that works, right?

What corruption? Did they accuse anyone of taking bribes? Was anyone assassinated? Did anyone have their property stolen?

@@Telmach i dont think you understand what corruption is this is a conservation program... that then was turned into a profit oriented business to control the lives of workers and to consolidate power in the hands of a few rich people i dont know how much more you could corrupt that original purpose

@@Telmach Yes, fisherman got their rights to fishing stolen

@@yuri0001 So the fishermen had their right to fish stolen, and they are going out into the ocean and tacking fish from the water, putting it into their boats, and delivering that cargo to the land. Yeah that's the worst kind of corruption, let our fishermen fish! Those dastardly fiends!

big business that doesn’t ruin things can’t stay big, cuz other big business that does ruin things will then proceed to scrap and gobble up that “restrained” big business

Sure, if the people ensure they are kept in perpetual fear of consequences.

There are a few. Costco refused to raise prices for their consumers even after Wall Street clowns demanded they do so.

They only have that control through government regulation. You vote for them to have MORE control.

It's against their interests. Organisations always have built-in self-preservation, and capitalism is an eat-or-be-eaten system.

Yeah I'm with you on this one. They can fuck right off

Exactly. We should all be happy and thankful we are being forced to abide by arbitrary rules turned into laws by rich men for even richer men and backed up by thugs with guns just doing their jobs and threatin with taking your livelihood and freedom. Then labeled unpatriotic and a left wing liberal for not backing the "blue" who are happily destroying our rights.

Hey maybe if the rest of the country didn’t also experience this everyday some of us might care about you

And are they at all related to the U.S. Marine Corps., or do they just call themselves "marine" because it sounds cool?

@@InventorZahran “Aqua Rangers” wasn’t cool? “Sea Guardians!”? I guess it sets a bad precedent to include exclamation points in law enforcement agency names…

​@@InventorZahran🤦‍♂️

Fish Dicks

Most states have state law enforcement like a "marine patrol" in charge of bodies of water, including lakes, rivers and coastal water, since regular cops don't usually have boats. There are also fish and game officers/wardens who make sure you are hunting/fishing legally

This people made me laugh they made it sounded like SWAT raided them so dramatic

They were gonna Ruby ridge you over a license? No wonder why this country's fucked

In Virginia they still cite some 1600s bullshit colonial law to justify trespassing as "conservation officers" for any reason without a warrant

People can tell youre wildly out of touch with the real world by your comment. Walmart has been hiring people at a significantly greater rate of pay than minimum wage for many years now. There are plenty of reasons to dislike walmart, but this particular reason is an actual out of touch lie

What walmart pays minimum wage??

Yep…great comment.

Do you feel that way, or do you want to actually change things like reset the licensing system so that moneyphagging families that are in on this scam will lose their generational cash cows 😈

Oh you don’t like that kind of thinking huh 😂

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pJyAjM1qmLmrqJc.html

Yes!!!! I hate this!!!!!! I want an alternative!!!

paying both is fine, but too much privatization and consolidation is terrible for everyone but the elite

@@grimaffiliations3671 do not call them elites call them leaches

Property and land taxes are there to pay for essential services. They also are a check against the formation of monopolies. Without such taxes, there is no downside to consolidation of property ownership, which causes an ever-smaller number of real estate corporations to own all land and forces everyone else to be renters.

@@radishpineapple74 property taxes support public schools, which should be generously supported, but not through property taxes alone, but through a combination of federal funding and other monies from the general fund. If PT should exist, and I'm not so sure they should, they should be less than what they are now, no more than 1%, and become optional after 5 or 10 years. At a minimum, no authority should ever be able to take your primary home if you can't or won't pay them; at _least_ if you cant. Think about it, for perhaps a claimed debt of $10,000 they're going to take a home worth $400,000? I presume they then auction it and give you back the difference, but it's still a cruel inhumane process. And what if they don't give you back the difference? I haven't researched it specifically yet, so I'm not even sure if they do, which makes it all the more evil and criminal. But for the moment, for the sake of argument, let's say they do. Let's say you received the difference in money that they received from the sale. So you're not left completely penniless but I doubt you received the full value of what that home is worth from said sale, so now in addition to being temporarily homeless you have lost some value of your home most likely in some level of excess from your original alleged tax debt. IE, if your home was fully worth $400,000 but only sold for $310,000 and your tax debt was only $10,000, you have lost $80,000 above and beyond what you ever legally owed. If you owe me $500 would I be justified in taking your car worth $20,000, selling it and then giving you back the difference? That wouldn't be moral. Or even worse, not giving you the difference back at all? So that essentially I stole your car from you??? I took a huge asset from you for a tiny fraction of its actual worth- now that's a crime. People want to be out here literally screaming about poor people taking toothpaste and baby formula from Walmart or clothes from some random big box store, stores that could give away 80% of their inventory and still make a profit, absolutely minor meaningless street level petty theft from multi-millionaire stores and billionaire chains, but people don't seem to realize the massive amounts of government theft and crime that we have to live with every day. Even if those rules exist for the purposes you claim, it hasn't stopped anything. Billionaires and mega millionaires can still easily buy as much land or property as they want, and they are. Bill Gates owns more land than 60% of the population put together. Corporations own the rest. So if that was its purpose, it's not working. There are plenty of land monopolies out here. There are quasi- monopolies of property in rental housing, including SFDHs, by mega corporate bodies like Black Rock. The corporate mega-consolidation of all our essential resources is well underway. Land taxes may be fair if they are progressive and rise as a proportion based on the value and amount of land, but I would have to look into them further. Again, the same principle applies- they have no right to take the land if you're unable to pay these taxes. The land might be worth 2m, the tax that on it may be 20,000; they are in no way equal and then no moral universe does one equate to the other. Seizing your two most important assets, your land and/or home, is just another way publicly-funded criminals (govt bureaucrats) destroy you for sport and profit. It's certainly inhumane and causes a lot of harm to people. I imagine most people who haven't paid their recent property or land taxes do so more out of lack of ability than personal opposition. Anything to keep government thugs out of our lives is probably an expense most people would be willing to pay IF they could afford it. What hardship programs exist for those who literally just don't have the means at the moment? Are there any? I don't know the answer to this but I'm willing to bet the answer is no. How easy it is for a megabank to foreclose on one's home??? All too easy, as too many good people found out in the wake of 2008, and this is by design. Human well-being and personal property rights are a joke in a society administered by bloodthirsty tyrants who want material accumulation by any means necessary. It's far too easy to evict a rental tenant and with a little extra effort, a homeowning family, and this is very MUCH by design. Families' lives can be upended for years and years, their future renting or home purchasing ability can be seriously affected, so they stay in the cycle of homelessness and destabilization sometimes for decades but certainly for some years, unless they are fortunate and have a family to reach out to or get lucky in some way. As a humane person I find this wrong, I find this unjust, and I demand a different system of laws which haven't been bought-and-paid-for by big banks and corporate rental landlords, and supported by greedy ruthless local municipal government officials. We can discuss tenant and rental reform later but at a minimum homeowner and land-owning reform seems urgently needed.

They'll blow you away like a dog and get away with it. Cops are only there to protect the property and assets of the 1%

This IS capitalism. Capitalists will always try something to destroy their competitors. The goal of capitalism is maximum profit and in the country there's nothing to stop it.

​@@austinhernandez2716I think thats why he calls it a myth.

@@austinhernandez2716 That is the way capitalism always ends up with no strong regulations by the government, monopolies always buy up all competition and all that is left is corporations. Socialist planned economy with full democracy has always been the answer but they always get assassinated it seems. Cheers

Wich would only make it even worse - because without regulations there’s overfishing! That being said, there’s better ways to solve these issues where catch-shares get divided in a manner where it’s viable for small scale single owner boats…

It is a country run by oligarchs

They served and protected the hell out of that fisherman.

Agreed. I have always understood Tragedy of the Commons to describe what happens when something ISN'T collectively managed, allowing individuals to act according to their own self-interest. The "derby days" were still a form of management meant to avoid a Tragedy of the Commons.

I’m very satisfied that we made Uber and similar companies illegal here in my country!

​@gorillaguerillaDK uber and lyft helped kill a monopoly system that had poor service, long wait times and extremely high prices

Those coins were a retirement plan for NY cabbies

The Department of Education is administered by the United States secretary of education. It has 4,400 employees - the smallest staff of the Cabinet agencies[5] - and an annual budget of $68 billion.[6] The President's 2023 Budget request is for $88.3 billion.

THANK YOU. This is a HUGE. Problem The working conditions of elementary teachers is horrible

The public education system is working exactly as intended to produce a population of ignorant slaves that can't see through the lies of the elites.

The colleges of education at our universities are a huge part of the problem. They are the ones who keep publishing bullshit research and pushing for equity-based programs. The biggest need right now is to separate lower performing and anti-social kids like they used to.

Blame the Unions. They have complete control.

Stop with your bs. most teachers today don’t educate, they indoctrinate. The more funding the schools get the worse the outcomes for students are. Prime example is Ca. which spends the most per capita and has nearly the worst graduation rates The federal government has no authority to be involved in education and it needs to be governed localized once more.