How Cheap Cigars Legitimized Quantum Mechanics

Рет қаралды 310,467

Ай бұрын

The Stern-Gerlach Experiment in lauded in textbooks around the world for its contributions to the world of quantum physics. But for a few years, scientists unknowingly praised it for proving the wrong thing! Because instead of proving an established hypothesis about how electrons work, it had actually discovered an entirely unexpected phenomenon (called spin).
Hosted by: Hank Green (he/him)
----------
Support us for $8/month on Patreon and keep SciShow going!
/ scishow
Or support us directly: complexly.com/...
Join our SciShow email list to get the latest news and highlights:
mailchi.mp/sci...
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever: Odditeas , Garrett Galloway, Friso, DrakoEsper , Kenny Wilson, J. Copen, Lyndsay Brown, Jeremy Mattern, Jaap Westera, Rizwan Kassim, Harrison Mills, Jeffrey Mckishen, Christoph Schwanke, Matt Curls, Eric Jensen, Chris Mackey, Adam Brainard, Ash, You too can be a nice person, Piya Shedden, charles george, Alex Hackman, Kevin Knupp, Chris Peters, Kevin Bealer, Jason A Saslow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: scishow-tangen...
TikTok: / scishow
Twitter: / scishow
Instagram: / thescishow
Facebook: / scishow
#SciShow #science #education #learning #complexly
----------
Sources:
docs.google.co...

Пікірлер: 354

@NikhillRao27 Ай бұрын

"Imagine a ball that's spinning. Only it's not a ball and it's not spinning"

@xdtjv2843 23 күн бұрын

Electron spin

@chasenthedragon Ай бұрын

"Gatterman recommends that the operator smoke during the preparation, for he found that a trace of hydrogen cyanide is sufficient to give the tobacco smoke a highly characteristic flavor. This preliminary warning is useful in case of leaky apparatus or a faulty hood."

@brigidtheirish Ай бұрын

When my paternal grandpa was in high school, one of the math problems on a test required finding the volume of the intersection of two cylinders. He pictured the cylinders in his head and came up with the answer. Thing is, the test required that he show his work, so he scribbled down what he though *might* be the equation before moving on. The next day, the teacher asked to speak with him. Turns out, he was the only student in the class to get that particular question rigth, but his equation was *all wrong.*

@SeraphRyan Ай бұрын

I had this issue too, I knew what the answer was for questions, but I hated showing my work cause.. I couldn't. I knew it was right, but I couldn't explain how I knew it was right.

@DAndyLord Ай бұрын

@@SeraphRyan My father is a master estimator. I did not inherit all his talents, but I'm really good at estimating area and volume. It's really eerie watching my dad do math in his head. He's never "right" but he's like 3 decimal places right 90% of the time.

@brigidtheirish Ай бұрын

@@SeraphRyan I generally suck at math, but I drove my mom *nuts* because I'd get word problems right and equations *wrong.* Somehow, the word problems made more sense.

@sheldontucker4287 Ай бұрын

I remember a HS Statewide test where I looked at the graphic where they wanted us to calculate a distantance and it looked to scale to me. So I just measured the answer distance and gave the answer. Some questions I just did in my head. I was questioned because I hardly used the paper they gave us to do our calulations.

@csueconner9711 Ай бұрын

My son could spout off the answer to any math question, no matter how complicated, but could never tell you how he reached his conclusion. It turned out to be his particular thought process. As he described it, the average person might see green but doesn’t think blue and yellow. They think green. That’s how he saw math.

@generaledelogu1892 Ай бұрын

At least there's no confirmation bias since he's trying to prove it wrong initially 😂

@ethanp1erce Ай бұрын

A much more reliable way of testing.

@matthewkolb9950 Ай бұрын

"Have even gotten a math test back and found you got a tricky question right?" No

@eljanrimsa5843 Ай бұрын

Thenn you need to smoke more cheap cigars

@nigeldepledge3790 Ай бұрын

Just to clarify a point with the historical context, Hank : the Weimar republic instituted in 1919 did indeed have a problem with inflation, but *hyperinflation* only reared its ugly head in 1923 (triggered by France occupying the Ruhr Valley where almost all of Germany's manufacturing industries were located, as a punitive measure when Germany stopped paying the reparations stipulated in the treaty of Versailles). By your account, the experiment was successfully performed in 1922, at least several months before hyperinflation kicked in. I don't know if there's a technical distinction between severe inflation and actual hyperinflation, but 1923 was the year in which the cost of basic subsistence was increasing so fast that you had to spend all your money on pay-day because it might buy only half as much food a few days later. More specifically, this was the latter half of 1923. Up until perhaps May of 1923, there was still some hope that inflation could be reined in before the currency crashed.

@TatsuoRadovan Ай бұрын

Task failed successfully!

@baruchben-david4196 Ай бұрын

Someone - maybe Feynman - said that when an experiment is verified, you learn something. And when an experiment is refuted, you also learn something.

@katbairwell Ай бұрын

This is such a healthy take, it's joyful, and I shall endeavour to carry it with me, for the next time I am very wrong about something!!

@nibblesnbits Ай бұрын

@@baruchben-david4196 it's an unfortunate fact that most people don't understand that the experiments that fail are often the most important ones.

@talentlesszigs8393 Ай бұрын

I'm b@@katbairwellnd😂b ed Know what I mean

@pingyong6940 Ай бұрын

Oxymoron XD

@grnd4y Ай бұрын

I understood every word you just said completely and also still have no idea how any of this works.

@GSBarlev Ай бұрын

Congratulations! You're ready for a career in physics. Nobody understands "how it works," and anyone who claims to is trying to sell you something. QM is *deeply weird,* and, unlike classical mechanics and relativity, which can be derived, more or less, from pure logic, quantum mechanics requires complex and expensive experiments to determine which "solutions" it produces are "physical" (see the other video on: "Does antimatter fall up?").

@Yvolve Ай бұрын

As a serious reply: Imagine a spinning ball that is magnetic, with one half being positive and one half being negative. It is shot through a strong magnet and lands on a surface behind it. To make it more visual, you can also imagine a ball with a light at either end. The old theory was that the ball was magnetic all the time, so if it spins, the magnetic field constantly changes direction in relation to its movement. Imagine the ball with lights being thrown with spin and how wildly the direction of the light would vary. The new theory was that the ball wasn't magnetic all the time, so if it spins, it is only affected by the magnetic at intervals. This would be like the ball with lights flashing instead of being constantly on. The result of the old theory is a random, linear pattern as the ball can have the magnetic field be in every direction. The result of the new theory is a specific pattern as the ball has a known spin and known interval in which it is magnetic. This makes the pattern predictable as there is a constant instead of absolute randomness, proving that particles act in the way quantum physics describes.

@rickhobson3211 Ай бұрын

You must be a physicist!

@tonytins Ай бұрын

Breaking the IRL fourth wall.

@jamielonsdale3018 Ай бұрын

Congratulations, you understand quantum mechanics as well as any expert. Which is to say we dont understand it, but we're starting to figure out a number of facts, even if we cannot fully comprehend those facts.

@rayneweber5904 Ай бұрын

Man that chemo perm is always surprising.

@nat_the_gray 29 күн бұрын

It also happens from some anti-epileptics like Depakote.

@colddogs Ай бұрын

smoking in the lab, the famous follow-up song to smoking in the boys room

@dysonkennedy6796 Ай бұрын

physics student here! I never knew there was that lil whoopsie period with Bohr's angular momentum. it's easier to teach some basic spin than it is atomic oriental angular momentum so it makes sense but this is delightful

@leonhardtkristensen4093 Ай бұрын

Bohr's idea was better than what was before him I believe and serves well to get some idea.. We keep on learning things better and more accurate but I don't think we have come to the end of it.

@theninja4137 Ай бұрын

@@leonhardtkristensen4093 of course, we probably wouldn't know his name if he was conpletely wrong. And (to my knowledge) his model is still useful for some applications, in a "use the simplest tool that does the job" kind of way - like Newton's laws of motion don’t completely accurately describe forces, masses and acceleration, but we don't bring out relativity to calculate how a car accelerates

@peterchan5817 Ай бұрын

10:51 Nolan: hold my joint

@hashbrown777 Ай бұрын

Cigar*

@sarahleonard7309 Ай бұрын

My entire career has been based on the spin of unpaired electrons. So, thank you, Stern & Gerlach!

@josephhargrove4319 Ай бұрын

I'm just amazed that the quantitative relationship between the two angular momenta was ½ and not some seemingly random but close value like √3/𝜋 or some other random, difficult to pin down irrational value. Measurements from nature may appear to relate to each other by (the incredibly convenient) powers of 2, but they rarely actually do. Close may be good enough for the abstract cigar, but not close enough for lab work. richard --

@deinauge7894 Ай бұрын

in this case they do, because both values are determined by the same thing: symmetry under rotations and the special angle of 360°

@tezzastutorials5592 Ай бұрын

Interestingly enough, that extra factor of 2 that the electrons pick up in their magnetic moments isn't actually 2, but around 2.00231930436092. The extra contribution comes from interactions between the electrons and the quantum electromagnetic field.

@SlowToe Ай бұрын

If I've learnt anything from this video it's to take up cigars. Thanks Crash Course ❤

@Brown95P Ай бұрын

Generations will truly remember the Stern-Gerlach Experiment as the first scientific implementation of the "task failed successfully" meme.

@General12th Ай бұрын

The Michelson-Morley experiment did it earlier.

@aliciakidd7940 Ай бұрын

Look at that curly hair coming in! Lol just a reminder how lucky we are to still have you on this Earth. Thank you for being you.

@Pow3llMorgan Ай бұрын

My mom's hair came back curly after her chemo for breast cancer some 8-9 years ago. Greyer than before but thicker and much more curly.

@kellydalstok8900 Ай бұрын

@@Pow3llMorgan My cousin’s previously thick and curly hair came very thin and straight. The fact that she dyes her hair a dark brown colour makes her scalp stand out more than if she didn’t dye it.

@davido2644 Ай бұрын

Love the 90s / early 00s aesthetic of the background and some instances of the camera work. Also, look into the "discovery" of potassium flare stars, another incident in science (astronomy) involving smoking.

@rosskappa5410 Ай бұрын

Beautifully explained a somewhat complex story. I love this channel. Hope I can have the economic power to support you guys in the future !

@GSBarlev Ай бұрын

Physics PhD here-Stern's initial reaction is entirely understandable. When a modern-day physics major learns about quantum mechanics, one of three thing happen: 1. They have a crisis of faith upon learning that microscopic particles behave deeply "unphysically" 2. They see how quantum laws align with classical mechanics principles as the number of particles goes to infinity and think, "Wow, neat! I'm one step closer to understanding the universe's 'source code'" 3. They decide that it's all _useful math_ and decide not to take any of it too seriously beyond its ability to make predictions. Broadly generalizing: - People in the third group go on to have long, productive careers in physics - People in the first group switch to engineering - People in the second group go on to *become crackpots.*

@car103d Ай бұрын

What category are the three Nobel 2022 physicists Clauser, Aspect, Zeilinger for quantum entanglement, quantum teleportation and their applications?

@Creative_name_5 Ай бұрын

I can confirm this. I was in the second group. I'm currently researching the corelation of the raise of crime with the decline of spirographs. Think about it

@bjornfeuerbacher5514 Ай бұрын

"They see how quantum laws align with classical mechanics principles as the number of particles goes to infinity" Huh? This doesn't work in many cases, e. g. in metals, you have a very large number of electrons which don't behave classically at all.

@lgbtthefeministgamer4039 28 күн бұрын

also a physics PHD here, im off that good kush and alachol

@S4LT3DD Ай бұрын

H-bar? Are you serious? Scientists named something normal ONE TIME and I struggle to grasp the concept of it. Yet when they want to name an everyday medication EVERYONE uses they use the most random jumble of letters to be thought of.

@AxyzGrid Ай бұрын

Scientists don't really name medications anymore, marketing teams do.

@iffyfox9749 Ай бұрын

@@AxyzGridWell said. There's an entire study on the name of diseases/disorders and their subsequent medication, and what key additions to the name make it more appealing to consumers

@porcorosso4330 Ай бұрын

Isn't h-bar the Planck's constant?

@anonymes2884 Ай бұрын

@@porcorosso4330 _Reduced_ Planck's constant (it's basically Planck's constant divided by 2*Pi).

@JackFoxtrotEDM Ай бұрын

@@AxyzGrid"The bell doesn't dismiss you, I do!"

@terrafirma5327 Ай бұрын

When you stare into the quantum void, it... panics.

@QuintonMurdock Ай бұрын

This is comedic in such a nerdy way. The story has comedy to it that only some people would be able to appreciate the impressiveness and the comedy

@rickbannan7110 Ай бұрын

Still getting used to curly-haired Hank. Not like it's a bad thing, just "oh yeah he underwent a transformation because of murdering cancer"

@ffc1a28c7 Ай бұрын

tbf, it's not generally permanent. Give it a few years, he'll likely have his old hair type back.

@matheussanthiago9685 Ай бұрын

the epitome of " it's going to be okay, but it's going to be different"

@rickbannan7110 Ай бұрын

@@matheussanthiago9685 For the record I think he looks great but I had similar hair in HS (when the hormones chilled out it got straighter)

@Brownyman Ай бұрын

Using silver during hyperinflation is dedication.

@plwadodveeefdv 13 күн бұрын

they snuck this one in right before hyperinflation

@eli507 Ай бұрын

Nuance time! It is understandable why it didn't make the script, though. The earth also has momentum the sun's orbit around the galaxy, and the galaxy's trajectory toward the Andromeda galaxy.

@ffc1a28c7 Ай бұрын

eh, nothing Hank said discounts that.

@mailcs06 Ай бұрын

Tbf all motion is relative

@logarhythmic6859 Ай бұрын

Those components are negligible. "Nuance" doesn't mean including things that are irrelevant. Same reason he says it's not worth discussing why planets orbit on a roughly flat plane.

@fischmann1746 Ай бұрын

And don't forget the angular momentum from the rotation with the moon.

@fischmann1746 Ай бұрын

@@mailcs06Rotation is an accelerated motion. So it is not relative as only one frame of reference is free of centrifugal forces.

@T33K3SS3LCH3N 28 күн бұрын

5:55 the left picture says "WITHOUT magnetic field" and the right "WITH magnetic field" The text roughly says "Dear Mr. Bohr, here are the results of our tests of the directional quantisation. Congratulations to the confirmation of your theory!"

@treborg777 Ай бұрын

There are so many great physics stories from the early 20th century. I haven’t this one before.

@sepiar7682 Ай бұрын

Wow this was a super interesting video, never heard of this mixup! Crazy that it all worked out how it did

@MOSMASTERING Ай бұрын

I think this is easily my favourite Sci-Show episode ever.. not only is it educational, but funny, its advanced quantum theory dramatically - discovering 'spin'.. And, you can tell how smart these people are, because I got to the middle of the video and was like "cool, so, that makes sense" but no.. even smarter people later, picked it apart and discovered it was right, for the wrong reasons.. and one of the craziest things about spin is that you can have ½ spin, where you have to rotate the particle 720⁰ (twice all the way round) just to get back to its starting point. I can't believe we have worked any of this stuff out because it is a hard combination of nonsense and counter intuitive facts. Oh, and the cherry on top was Hank. Looking great and radiating enthusiasm!

@General12th Ай бұрын

This episode is surprisingly good!

@bennyfactor 11 күн бұрын

Thanks for making a video on these early quantum physics people - I love the stories of these sorts of experiments from the time of the ultraviolet catastrophe to the end of wwii, when scientists didn't have any computers or huge particle accelerators or anything like that, just hilarious contraptions and cigar smoke and yet they were making all these counterintuitive discoveries about the smallest parts of the universe.

@josiahhaifley2839 27 күн бұрын

We got cheap cigars legitimizing quantum mechanics before GTA 6

@paulunga 18 күн бұрын

I've never heard of Stern before, but him sending a photo and congratulating Bohr on confirming his theory sounds like a class act.

@klocugh12 Ай бұрын

Sometimes a cigar is just cigar. And apparently sometimes a cigar also accidentally leads to great scientific discovery.

@adamwishneusky Ай бұрын

Love this video that’s somewhat deeper than many scishow videos (also super like the quick ones I watch while wolfing down lunch 😋 )

@LindysEpiphany Ай бұрын

What a perfect story for understanding how the scientific method works. Best class I took in college was the History and Philosophy of Science!

@unmanaged Ай бұрын

Please do more long form videos like this ...

@capt.bart.roberts4975 Ай бұрын

"Spooky action, at a distance..."

@88icryspy Ай бұрын

The question this video left me with is how do scientists collect a single atom for those types of experiments? With the way search engines work now I can't seem to find an answer

@RedHair651 Ай бұрын

They don't really collect individual atoms. The way it's done nowadays is different, but the way it was done in that experiment is heating a chunk of silver in an oven so it emitted silver particles, and then passing these particles through a series of slits in order to only keep the ones going in a specific direction.

@MalcolmCooks Ай бұрын

with really tiny tweezers

@88icryspy Ай бұрын

@@MalcolmCooks thought so

@88icryspy Ай бұрын

@@RedHair651 yes after doing much more research I saw that it's more a "stream" of particles per se

@nothanks9503 26 күн бұрын

Either magnetic fields or lasers sort of like how you can make a ping pong ball hover with air the pressure from lasers can move a single atom around

@nemosomen 25 күн бұрын

Absolutely wild that two men that worked so much together on things I don’t understand wound up on opposite sides of history

@emmyfreudenrich4646 Ай бұрын

I never knew about the cigar smoke part of the experiment! Much of the rest is taught in many intro quantum courses but the fun cigar smoke information is really interesting!

@bentoth9555 Ай бұрын

For as many times as I've heard of Stern-Gerlach machines (thanks PBS Space Time!) this is the first time I've heard the whole story.

@Sugar3Glider Ай бұрын

At what speed would a hydron collider need to move/spin to cause noticable change in its normal operation?

@conlon4332 Ай бұрын

1:13 Um, why is there a little "Credit:" on Hank's chest?

@geeksdo1tbetter Ай бұрын

I think that was supposed to name the creators of those two images, but now it's a typo!

@Blackmuhahah 8 күн бұрын

One mistake I think is worh noting, in quantum physics lingo it's not the magnetic moment that is two, it's the so called g-factor (or Landé factor depending on who you ask) for the electron that is two.

@markedis5902 Ай бұрын

I had a feeling that we are still working with a wrong or more likely incomplete model of quantum physics

@AnonymousAnarchist2 Ай бұрын

yes of course. The amount of energy we need to really test out the multiple models is litterally astronomical. We *need* a space based economy. Not just for the energy collection required for the science either. We need to end scarcity for people, and accept that it wont be profitable, it will end the idea of profit as a motive at all. Fame, Fun, Helping each other, and Exploration. Not profit will be the currencies of the future and we have to switch it up, or accept the inevitable, and terrible wars we will cause otherwise.

@nottelling7438 Ай бұрын

A lot of very smart people have thought quantum mechanics might be incomplete, but the ways people try to complete it tend to be incompatible with the original theory. See Bell's theorem for an example.

@General12th Ай бұрын

You're right that we don't have a full model of quantum gravity yet. Buuuuuuut we can't discount the successes of QFT. Just look at the device you watched this video on. The results speak for themselves.

@ericbnielsen Ай бұрын

I just watched the CSI episode the Theory of Everything which included the Mythbuster’s String Theory and Characters named Bohr, Planck and a cat named Schrödinger.

@digguscience Ай бұрын

In quantum physics, the Stern-Gerlach experiment demonstrated that the spatial orientation of angular momentum is quantized. Thus an atomic-scale system was shown to have intrinsically quantum properties.

@heck_n_degenerate940 Ай бұрын

I will never forget one time in my sophomore year math class we were competing with other students in groups of 4. I was the de facto leader of my group because I was well regarded as one of the best math guys in our class, and on one particular problem I got the answer 15. Now a member of my group who was the only other person that decided to complete this problem as well looked at my work and noticed a few logical errors, while their own work appeared to have no issues. Begrudgingly the group decided to go with his answer. The correct answer to that problem was in fact 15, and had we gone with that answer we would’ve one the competition with a perfect score. Alas we did not go with that answer and came in second.

@aoifedeborha2420 Ай бұрын

Not me thinking we’d go away knowing how to extract quantum particles from cigars 😂

@randyadsit2093 Ай бұрын

Earth has a third source of angular momentum - Earth revolves around the “barycenter” for the Earth-Moon system.

@S3IIL3CT Ай бұрын

hell yea, great episode with hank with the coolest topic in a while

@Abdega Ай бұрын

Smoking in the lab is also how cyclamate was discovered as an artificial sweetener

@halfsourlizard9319 Ай бұрын

Never know what you'll discover when you set your ciggie on some chemicals ... and then resume smoking it like nothing happened!

@tuxedonoir7970 Ай бұрын

Man, I am so glad you're doing well. I missed your science sass.

@havanaradio 22 күн бұрын

Proving yourself wrong is a glorious moment for any serious scientist 🥰

@katbairwell Ай бұрын

I sometimes wonder if the sciences have been more progressed by people who were willing to be wrong, than by those who were right. As someone that is wrong , like a whole heckin' lot (for a wild variety of neurodivergent, and disability reasons), it brings me a sense of peace, that maybe wrongness isn't inherently bad, and be something I can learn to sit comfortably with. I've not got there yet, but lessons in the history of science, like this one, are boeth educationally, and emotionally, edifying for me. Thank you SciShow, for giving me a healthier perspective on both the universe that exists all around us, and also the microuniverse that exists between my ears!

@davidhand9721 Ай бұрын

Different is not wrong. Solidarity.

@ultimus616 Ай бұрын

I am not a student in the field but I called that it was spin before it was mentioned in the video.. I never really understood what that meant but now I have a better idea of it (as better an idea one can have about quantum anything without a full education that is)

@anarchyantz1564 Ай бұрын

Soon as I heard the words "The Stern-Gerlach Experiment" I thought this was PBS Space time for a hot moment lol

@CG-yh6js Ай бұрын

I noticed the curls are slowly going back to straight!!!

@geeksdo1tbetter Ай бұрын

Yup! He did a great Sci Show about it!

@dosop8936 Ай бұрын

Am I wrong or do all planets not rotate on their axis? Yes they spin around the sun but they all freely spin on their own as they rotate the sun correct?

@davidhand9721 Ай бұрын

Yes and no. Ideally, they all _should_ rotate in the same plane as their orbits, just because they all got their angular momentum from the same place. However, other events like collisions can turn the axis of rotation, causing it to precess thereafter. Earth's orbit has a small but notable tilt that causes seasonal weather in part because of the collision that gave us the moon. I believe Uranus (could be a different planet, but I think it's Uranus) is all the way on its side.

@Psychx_ Ай бұрын

Smoking in the lab was also how the first artificial sweetener was found.

@tylerguy12 Ай бұрын

Is they audio not perfectly synchronized on this video? or is it youtube being screwy again

@sharada_dance Ай бұрын

Loved it! more videos like this please💛💛

@4RILDIGITAL Ай бұрын

It's amazing how in science, two wrongs can sometimes make a right.

@digitalcitizen4533 Ай бұрын

He was in a superposition of being right and wrong at the same time.

@stevengill1736 Ай бұрын

To me it's phenomenal how little time it's been since we developed these theories - what, a hundred years or so?

@Sarcasticron 27 күн бұрын

Hank is looking great! Especially the hair!

@itsmebougie Ай бұрын

Thank god for this. I was reading the history trying to wrap my head around this and couldn’t figure out what the hell happened

@davidhand9721 Ай бұрын

What's with that eyeball shape on the photographic plate, though? I've never heard anyone talk about anything other than the two piles at +/- h-bar. What happened with the ones on the sides?

@bjornfeuerbacher5514 28 күн бұрын

The magnetic field is weaker towards the edges, so the silver atoms get deflected less and less the more close they are to the edges. This results in this eye-like shape.

@AppliedCryogenics Ай бұрын

Would the Earth also have angular momentum from its orbit about the galactic center? I wonder if it would be more or less than it gets from orbiting the Sun.

@davidhand9721 Ай бұрын

Yes it does. The scales aren't going to match.

@rdyer8764 Ай бұрын

I especially liked this one. Unfortunately I can't really say why. If I could so I would say, do "this" again.

@danieljensen2626 13 күн бұрын

This is why science works, because if you carefully set out to prove someone else wrong you will often end up proving yourself wrong instead.

@MikeWiest Ай бұрын

Excellent, thank you!

@UnbanMeNowdotcom Ай бұрын

A great reminder of how multiple errors can sometimes lead to the right answer.

@ofirmilul5863 Ай бұрын

Great video! Thanks :)

@sIosha Ай бұрын

This is the silliest thing about physics I've ever heard and I love it 😂

@themostselfishman Ай бұрын

I love Dirac. What an interesting and amazing human being.

@chetanpadia4421 Ай бұрын

How did Quantum Physics give us micro chip and laser ?

@davidhand9721 Ай бұрын

Microchips utilize semiconductors, which only exist because of the quantum band gap structure of such materials. Lasers function because atoms absorb and emit light at only fixed energies, and interacting with a photon of one of those energies can stimulate the emission of another.

@ryderhook Ай бұрын

I like the stories behind the discoveries. You always present them in a very impressive and detailed way. But can you please clarify the pronunciation of the names of the people you are talking about? Google Translate in German certainly gets it right with the names Stern and Gerlach.

@Robert-yc9ql Ай бұрын

Nicely done. 😊

@fragman8350 27 күн бұрын

Physicists have always had a weird thing with smoking historically

@TheoHiggins 4 күн бұрын

Take a drink for every "Stern" and "Gerlach" and a shot for every "h-bar" You'll be discovering your own definition of spin after that

@JimmyJamesJ Ай бұрын

10:00 I think they just repeated the experiment so they had a valid reason to be allowed to smoke cigars in the lab. That's what I would have done.

@VicariousModder Ай бұрын

Smokin’ in the Bohrs room!

@rhondahuggins9542 Ай бұрын

The last math class I took...I'd get the tricky problems very surprisingly right and make a mess of the basic operations!🤦‍♀️

@baxterwilliams2170 Ай бұрын

Why does the mark on the silver look like a line and not two blobs in the photo???

@bobtron32 Ай бұрын

There might be one other situation where smoking in the lab is called for. Supposedly smoking a cigarette will let you smell hydrogen cyanide. I've seen the practice promoted as a saftey measure. I've never tried it myself obviously because I don't smoke.

@MikeWiest Ай бұрын

I think it’s the gyromagnetic ratio that is (close to) 2, not the magnetic moment. The magnetic moment has units…gyro magnetic ratio does not.

@Beryllahawk Ай бұрын

Love how this set of anecdotes shows us that science is tricky, quantum physics is WEIRD, and Hank has very strong opinions about best practices in the laboratory! Also that important knowledge is created not by lone geniuses (with or without cigars), but by MANY brilliant minds, and MANY long and frustrating hours of thought, experiment, rethinking, and debate. (Debate meaning, arguing without coming to blows about it, an art that seems to be vanishing these days)

@eSKAone- Ай бұрын

cigarette ash also played a role in the discovery of cilia on the lungs.

@Carewolf Ай бұрын

Moment doesn't sound like moment. One has the emphasis on the first sylllable the other on the last.

@Carewolf Ай бұрын

For disambiguity we say momentum in English.

@SubatomicLaundry Ай бұрын

Thanks!

@fadew55 Ай бұрын

That's actually crazy that Einstein and Max plank were at the same table

@dvoiceotruth Ай бұрын

They were friends of course. What's surprising?

@bjornfeuerbacher5514 Ай бұрын

What until you hear about the Solvay conferences. ;)

@ohnomydrotting Ай бұрын

I clicked on this informative video to try and justify my enjoyable habit of smoking cheap cigars. A note; I do not inhale, however, there is a substance called second-hand smoke! mike

@smurfyday Ай бұрын

This is a helluva great story!

@bbbenj Ай бұрын

Thanks a lot 👍

@leeborocz-johnson1649 Ай бұрын

I can't believe an adam could fit on the tip of a pin.

@colincrawford9208 Ай бұрын

Just want to point out that Hank’s curls are starting to look more like Jeremy Allen White than Mark Zuckerberg. Guess he might have to change his standup now.

@jodiunger9425 Ай бұрын

I'm not a physicist obviously, but the terms we use to explain physics really bothers me "spin" is just our best match word for the property not an exact description I get that, but when we try to define these things to a single word creates misinformation. Photons for example how we say it is in multiple places at once tell the moment it is measured makes people think the act of measuring it is what makes it's location defined, where as that is totally untrue but people say it almost as a matter of fact because they missunderstand the information and it's been repeated so many times. What we measure when we measure a photon is essentially measuring it's concentration at that moment, and it's physical location is never defined because it can't "be in multiple places at any time" rather it IS in multiple places at all times, but for ease of understanding we explain it in terms of probability.