Evil is mild!

porter is just like sheila jackson lee asks a question wants and answer and the instant you try to talk she shuts you up and then claims you wont answer lol we need trump back to not only drain the swamp but fill it with gators and clean up the rest

@@johnc27 You want an indicted traitor who is as stupid as a brick back in the White House? Why? He doesn't give a damn about anyone but himself.

@@johnc27Or like how every congress person conducts these committees regardless of party. 🙄 Are you saying you haven’t seen the right do the same exact thing? If you’re going to complain, at least be honest.

​@@johnc27 Porter: "Did you know that the law _______?' Witness: Yes The witness answered the question

No moral compass on this faux GOP tribe cult of defenders of a President who has done so many crimes that I have lost count. They are on video, audio, and this GOP cult think if they keep lying we won't notice when the next election comes around. There is a silent majority out there thats wants these cult of liars dumped.

There’s always been people like that. It’s not limited to one generation.

in fact SEVERAL generations, and they're called democrats

@@trallfraztake your meds old man 😊

This isn't new. Congress' response was the same before, during and after slavery. What's surprising?

That’s mean. It’s not her fault she is that obese.

Yeah, just because she's the cause of earthquakes doesn't mean you have to pick on her.

When Katie moves the ground quakes.... she farts with the force of Krakatoa after she stuffs her face. She caused the great tsunami that hit Japan by simply jumping in the ocean. A true leviathan of nature.

Wallace seems intimidated by Katie. I love that harsh reality

They fear Ms. Porter when she upcaps her pen and rolls up her sleeves . Listen to them whine like jackals .

When she gets Hilloried, then what?

Would love to have dinner and just listen to here...shit and Sunday brunch...then morning Monday breakfast

She will continue to rise up and be a strong, thoughtful voice in Congress.

@@jodnikinspace6475 Once she is in Prison no she will Not

What precisely will you charge her with & wh ere is your evidence for it? Please reply. Waiting for your answer.......

😂

Yup...good point.

Lol. Thanks.🤣

Indeed it is.

you're quoting a GREAT movie: "And Justice For All" starring AL PACINO

They don't except for protecting the gun manufacturers and the orange man.

The only things that have gotten done are the tons of bills that got past to lower insulin prices, to give relief to our veterans, the burn pit victims, The pact act The chips act … to move this valuable manufacturing to the United States 🇺🇸 and the many others… do you know that not one single republican voted to lower insulin prices and save lives? Republican is no longer a political party. It’s a party of monsters.

Lol true, look up PMQ and see how bad we have it

This is a DemoRAT

Congress demiRAT

The only thing crystal clear about her is her absurd bias.

@@9thR8Duelist What is it you disagree with?

Commie Katie Porter - she's advocating communist principles.

It is.....insane to me that anyone could say this, even a fake ass paid-to-post troll like yourself.

Not.

The problem is that this is a cross examination of the witness. It's great to have facts, but they need to lead to some sort of relevant question that pertains to the witness's expertise. Miss Porter was just grandstanding and talking AT the witness without asking questions. So no one knows if her "facts" are accurate or if they are even relevant to the witness's expertise. So it's a waste of everyone's time. Imagine if a pro-gun senator just listed facts about how many robberies or attacks were stopped by gun owners. It may be factual, but it's not relevant to the witness they are talking to. It would just be grandstanding for the least intelligent of observers. This is not how progress is made.

Nope porter has no Facts she is pulling stiff up to back her own narrative . Exercise machines are not protected by constitution but firearms are . She does need one of those machines though may be if we firced exercise besides gun control it would be more healthy .

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah

How about equally banning/recalling knives, vehicles, tobacco, alcohol, prescription medications and sugar?

Don't forget all vehicle manufacturers! Unless they create a vehicle that makes in IMPOSSIBLE, to purposefully drive over a pedestrian. Then it's their fault as a mfg someone was hit by their car. And should be sued into banckrupcy.@@peter.wilson

Um what?

@@stevedragojr4111 Candidates for power positions, for example President should require independent psych assessments to rule out ASPD. This would be prior to announcing candidacy. Min. of two assessments, with possibly a third. The people have a right to sanity in politics.

@@DogsReignSupreme liberalism is a mental disorder

@@stevedragojr4111 What kind of person would say that making human life better and safer is a neg. thing? Removing the masks and knowing the subhumans from the humans is a most excellent thing.

@@DogsReignSupreme I didn’t deny that. I just think you’re placing wayyy to much faith in these psych assessments which are easily manipulated. Why don’t they take lie detectors too? Because it’s all faulty science

She's asking questions, but not wanting answers. Do you know why? Because she wants to preach a woke anti-gun anti-American unconstitutional agenda. She doesn't care about answers. She doesn't care about facts. She just wants to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens, because like the witness said, some of them are scary looking.

Katie Porter is like any party hiding something Won’t allow the witness to speak. Or won’t speak when asked a pertinent worthwhile question.

@@acbonness12 so the problem in Washington is that there isn't enough political grandstanding then? I think the opposite is true.

Katie Porter is simply not allowing the witness to carry on and on and on.

@@acbonness12you didn’t listen, did you?

Very disrespecful. I saw all of the Watergate trial. There was no one who talked to anyone with disrespect. I am 76 and these people have disgraceful behavior.

Katie truly is disgrace. She should be in prison.

That's the young Congressman from Missouri, Josh Hawley! He's the one that gave the closed fist to the insurrectionists on J6 and was then seen RUNNING from the Capitol when they breached it. 😮😢😮

I believe the guy is an expert in Robert's Rules of Order, and is telling the chair woman how to respond to these "points of order" called out.

stopping and starting the clock. Ms Porter spent quite a bit of time "reclaiming her time". Apparently she didn't want to hear the answer, she just wanted to ask the question. Does that mean she's asking rhetorical questions? I'll take that as a "yes".

that's a great question...where doe s it all go?

DAMN RIGHT!!!

mexican drug cartels are the ones supplying the fentynol killing people, not big pharma.

Why should it. The governemnt HATES people. Have you forgotten all the people killed when they forced people to drive with deadly air bags in the car? Clinton giving aids tainted blood to africa. Hell surely you heard of Covid, chinese and our government collaboration to kill millions.

Not yet!

Great work on trying to shut down the Second Amendment and making sure a witness didnt anser with a full statement?

😆🤣🤣😆

That’s the funny thing they’re not assault weapons.

Even if they were “assault weapons,” every free man should have one.

@@davidapoland for what reason? you can own a smaller gun for the same purpose of self defense. there is no need for crazy monstrous guns. there just isnt.

@@edward3591 First of all "crazy monsterous" does not describe an AR. In fact, one reason to use an AR instead of even a typical shotgun is that smaller people, including women, can handle them much better. Second, every gun fight is an open competition. Use all the gun you can get. Conversely, in "No Gun Zones" the villain can be as effective with any gun because he's the only person with one. There are times when you need a rifle. We've seen increasing numbers of full on riots, even a rebellion in Portland where gangs took over a section of the city for weeks. There are times in natural disasters where society breaks down for days. You want a rifle then. Finally, the entire point of the 2A is to keep the government in check. We have drifted a long way from the constitution and some very corrupt, banana republic stunts are going on. Armed citizenry is the last line of defense.

ideology uber alles- BOTH parties! D's want to ban scaaary looking rifles, R's want to ban drag queens , medical treatment for TS, and open discussion of history.

@randorover Jesus INSTRUCTED his Disciples to buy the modern military grade weapon of the time...a sword. All my adult life after the military I teach/taught children how to defend themselves, even lethally, with firearms knives pencil/pens, rocks, sticks, etc. All of them are still alive, today. I guess God listened to me...since God uses PEOPLE to perform his needs...Your wrong ..God suffers the children....they did NOT die because of their own lack of faith..they died because Satanic people in power and the churches have control....the child in the womb has been murdered for decades by these same scum as Katie Porter.. Katie Porter isd responsible for millions of dead children...and she is hypocrite leftist trash.

@randorover what a disgusting thing to say. I hope that you are held to that statement whenever you meet your maker. God is capable of ANYTHING. It’s His game, His board, and HIs players. He has made EVERYTHING known and unknown. If He intercedes and uses His people to nock down the walls of Jericho, so be it. Where a correction is needed, it happens. Otherwise, He gives us free will. With your absurd statement, He would prevent EVERY unjust death, crime, etc. Maybe before belittling Him, you get to know Him. Your eternal life is at stake, and I bet if you are asked about this statement when meeting HIm, you would want more than anything, a chance to undo it, and have a do over. Well here is your chance right now to undo it and have your do over. Best of luck.

@@christopherm903 This is what is said to the kids THATS WHAT THEY ARE POINTINGOUT. I think anyway

@@skybussey6147 no they are incoming God to make a point and making a mickey of Him, the facts, and the Second Amendment by being condescending ass hats.

@@christopherm903 OBVIOUSLY, THERE IS NO GOD, Mr. " Thoughts and prayers " GROW UP !

If you buy a cup of HOT coffee then you should know to be careful.

​@@jodij6280you failed to do your reAsEArCh on this one. Check the true origin of the warning. MAGA 2025

Team Liar!

​@@ClassicFIHD Pathetic retort.

He’s saying the truth

Probably needed a ratings boost since their minority is failing at EVERYTHING it touches...

they are afraid of a suit like Fox just went through.

@@justretired1573 suit...? That is payment for 2024

She is passionate about the subject. Are you offended?

@@janetives5470 She is passionate about taking guns away - NOT about saving lives or listening AT ALL about ideas on how to save lives. Not knowing things makes her ignorant. Intentionally avoiding finding out things makes her evil. Katie and others like her are dangerous to America.

Yes!! She is amazing!

Mine too. We need to shut these liars up.

Id rather see her as head of OMB . She's a cha- ching chick

If she ran for office, I would vote for her in a second.

Imagine allowing a witness to answer a question.

I want what you are smoking

She dont back down when the Repubs try to keep lying .

minus some millions😀

@@careyatchison1348 billions

Not for 100s of years like gun manufacturers have done. And in any case 2 wrongs don't make a right.

And the sackler

They never wrote one single prescription.

Parents lock up your weapons. I do when my grand children visit. Otherwise my shot gun is by my bed. I know how to use it and I will.

Great but people don't follow rules and that's not their kids fault. Other things that are dangerous for kids are designed so kids can't use them. For example, lids on medicines or dangerous household cleaners etc that kids can't open. Why are guns always the exception to rules that apply to everything else?

There is no cure for STUPID.

@@catherinewinkeler8587 Must be terrible to live with such fear that you need a shotgun by your bed.

@@dionysusnow I was broken into when I wasn't home. Someone was on my property when I was home. Shot the gun in the air and he left.

That’s why manufacturers SHOULD be for stricter gun laws. It’s all about the money. Saving lives is a distant second.

@@glendaadams1481 Federal law PROHIBITS firearms manufacturers from being sued for CRIMINAL uses of their products.

Probably legislation. Which evidently can be bought or sold by vested interests. It's a circus that goes around in a circle.

perjury in congress is not the same as perjury in court. Different standards. In congress it is purely a political standard. Just like impeachment. They could toss out perjury charges on a weatherman who was accurate with zero recourse for the weatherman.

The woman admitted that she had read the bill, and knew what was in it, yet her answer at the previous hearing was a contradiction to what the bill said. She answered the question, then wanted to ad some BS propaganda. Katie Porter wasn't having it.

@@darryldunmore5184 BS. It has to with context. If it was me I would got out and walked out and told Porter to stick it where the sun don't shine. I've seen Porter do this before. She's a disgrace. This wasn't a hearing, it was a platform

If the lady answered truthfully at all hearings and not try to spin the question she would have no problem. Why should porter let her kill all her time explaining why she was less than honest.

Try punctuation. It's awesome! Kudos on using the correct spelling of 'they're' for the situation, though.

Right just like anyone who buys a gun should be required to go through a background check and take the same classes and know what parts/accessories are there and pass a class on firearms

@@Wongseifu548 And anyone who buys a car should know everything about it right?

@@ItsCarlnotCarla well lets see in order to drive a car you need a learners permit, a provisional license and then after. 2 years get your full license. So yeah you can buy a car but you won't be able to drive it until you pass all the hoops first. If you want to buy a gun go for it but by that logic the persons gonna have to jump through a ton of hoops first

Amen

@@Wongseifu548 driving a car is a privilege, owning a firearm is a right just like freedom of speech is. So you want people to get a license before speaking as well? Fuckin Commie

Maybe ask that god to save those children. You know, the ones that haven't already died on his watch. Or is he too busy giving AIDS to children in Africa?

Someone should have told her Katie Porter don't play. She is smart and informed . This woman is not smart or informed. Great job again Katie Porter.

So are people

Great job!

Kind of like the whiteboard mtg uses all over the halls of Congress.... as usual, the r's are such hypocrites!

The Second amendment is more important than her feelings. They aren't facts or knowledge.

Lol, please direct me to the facts and knowledge.😂😂😂 I saw an fat cow take a cowardly swipe at someone who "wasn't supposed to defend themselves" and cry when they did. There were no facts. Please, direct me to them.

You libs are full of shizzle..

You are being sarcastic right?

@@davidshuff8838Unfortunately, no, she's not being sarcastic. Apparently as a Congressman, you can accuse people of criminal conduct without allowing them to respond. Me, if I were Ms Shearer, I would have stood up and walked out.

How did she lie? She was accused of lying and when she tried to defend herself from the accusation of perjury, the cow interrupted her.

​@@f.wallace8969Apparently that "cow" is a bit smarter than the lying witness. She asked a question, the witness answered that question and then the "cow" called her out. Just because she didn't like it, didn't make it wrong. There are no half lies, or lies with an explanation, they're just lies.

@alandueck210 she didn't ask any questions she just accused and made statements. She claims that since there was a grandfather clause in the bill and the lady knew that, that would be perjury because the lady said millions of Americans would be felons overnight. However, what isn't said(because she never let her answer) is how grandfather clauses require registrations. Registration is highly unconstitutional, and millions would not comply. Therefore... millions would become felons overnight. I would argue that they would actually become millions of revolutionaries overnight, but whatever.

LOL - Porter wasn't "asking a question" to get an answer- she was using her time to make political statements. make the witnesses look bad by choosing "snippets" of statements made to fit her narrative. She "acted like" she was asking a question so she could make her idiotic , so called points........old trick, everyone in congress does it

@@f.wallace8969 if you can't recognize congresswoman Porter asking a question, then maybe you should remain quiet.

Does that really matter? What an obvious red herring.

You shouldn't need an explanation for that :|

Google it.

Assault is an action. A gun is an object. Together they comprise a term made up by liberal anti gunners in the 80s to scare soccer moms into supporting their bogus laws.

@@cameronweston8688 because it doesn’t exist?

Put them in a trust, then add trustees. Trust remains owner while trustees change, adhering to ban on transfers but allowing whoever you want to maintain possession. Simple, but should not be necessary.

This isnt an atf regulation tax stamp, its state law. So yes, over time itll just be unpossesable legally​@finngamesknudson1457

We don't know what the witness said because she wasn't allowed to speak.

Katie is a nut job

Comrade Porter follows the Party(DNC/CCP) line!

the crybaby is telling the truth? Katie is telling the truth if you have the time to research. the young crying one who lied supports gun violence.

Bullshit…. Porter BLOCKED … the wines from EXPLAINING her answer

If the lady would have answered porters questions without elaboration, and if she would have let Ms. Porter finish her point, She would have been given the chance to elaborate after. As it was her answers were fueled by self preservation and emotion. if she would have let Ms. Porter's point be concluded, she would have had more time to think and not come off crass and hostile. Government and politics is basically theater, or sport. if you don't play the game you are being played, and if you are a no one you're not changing the rules.

The witness is a liar. You should be livid she is on your side.

@@loosilu please explain

Nonsense! It’s nothing like that.

@@iangrant4756 Simply saying so doesn't make it true. You have to defend your position. That is the difference between emotion and critical thought.

@@albatross5466 Well, you should apply the same standard to your claim! Because it was nonsense. And this video has nothing like Clinton's effort at obscuration within it.

Why were they guaranteed immunity? What is the history of that guarantee?

@@ColonelFredPuntridge was part of the deal made for "Project Warp Speed"

@@timothynaquin8899 WRAWWWWG!!! The policy is much older than that.

@@ColonelFredPuntridge then why ask if you know it's older? I'm only talking about what applies to OWS and the COVID Vaccines

@@timothynaquin8899 I ask in order to determine whether you know what you are talking about or not. So far: NOT! The vaccine manufacturers were granted immunity, and a special vaccine-only court system for evaluating lawsuits, because they were being sued out of business by morons filing junk-lawsuits which were being decided by know-nothings who didn't understand the issues. So the companies went to Congress and said: fix this and protect us, or we will stop selling vaccines in USA altogether. Ask your constituents whether they want to go back to the days when everyone worried about getting polio and spending the rest of their lives in a wheelchair like FDR.

if that person wouldn't have a gun he wouldn't be sentenced.

Never seen a pill sentenced either but the first thing you hear on the border debate is fentanyl is coming cross it. Not to mention the big deal over the opioid (crisis). As soon as drugs started affecting certain people it became a “crisis.”

Oversimplification of the issue

They should be sentencing the Gun manufactures to jail, that would solve the problem.

The gun is on trial

Nice troll account

Yes, aren't they amazingly annoying?

@ wong Thanks, I work out.

@observ Lol yes.

@@Wongseifu548 bot

No we need more people who believe in the second amendment.

@@brucecampbell4528 Agreed.

We don't need anymore morons.

I forgot treasonous.

Indeed. Katie Porter is a badass. She isn't owned by lobbyists & brings the receipts!

This is a direct result of how allowing lobbyists to influence politicians does nothing but create conflict and division. Our politicians don't care about what their constituents want, they only care what their political party wants and the party only cares about what lobbyists pay them money for Our government structure as developed by our forefathers was genius, but over time politicians have completely gutted the original intent because of their own greediness and self-interests. And it's not just one party -- it's both of them. Without lobbyists the Democrats and Republicans would have negotiated an acceptable middle ground on this years ago.

keep funding it, they will care about your safety, tomorrow

@@WithaJoeFroSo untrue. Republicans have been trying to misguide the public systematically in all aspects. Why? Bevause they are the party of the big money, the big donors and the big lobby. Fossile fuel, NRA, against Obamacare ( because of lobbyists from the pharmaceutical industry), anti abortion ( due to lobbyists of church) , systematic trying to have people NOT vote, etc etc. The list is endless. Why? Because they’ll loose on the popular vote every and each time, thus they must walk the fraudulous and corrupt line as much as they can.

It will trip the braker

@@joserenteria7170 🙄

sure but we have still mandated companies to put a big, obvious and difficult to remove pictograph to communicate that danger to consumers. would you support a mandate that puts a big, obvious and difficult to remove "safety is off" indicator on firearms?

​@@joserenteria7170 "breaker"

👍

not really. Water doesnt come with safety instructions or any inherently 'Proper' way to use it. Youve presented a very poor argument by trying to compare 'proper uses' of two very different 'products'. The ONLY proper use of a gun is to pull the trigfer to send a round into something: its sole function is to propel a bullet into a living being in order to end its life. There are no 'no injury' guns, there are no 'wont kill' guns. A guns sole dunction is to kill. Yes, you CAN shoot targets but its still putting a round into something. Water has multiple uses but doesn't have a sole or single use, it is provided as a necessity and IS a necessity to life, guns are not. Noone NEEDS a gun but you DO need water.

@@seanmcdonald5859 There is a wonderful place on Earth that is completely free of guns , no one has ever been shot at on this paradise Island. The people living on it have never owned a single gun. They have no need of guns at all. Its called North Sentinel Island in the tropical Andaman Sea. You will need only a canoe to get there after paying a charter boat to drop you off only 5 km from shore. Those native islanders will appear on the beach as you approach waving their arms while jumping up and down waiting to embrace you as you approach. Not one of them would even know how to shoot a gun, there has never been one on this paradise island. Good luck and pleasant dreams - your dream awaits you.

If lawmakers lie they can be punished for it. The witness in this case was clearly lying or utterly ignorant of what the proposed legislation actually said! There's no dispute on that!

What exactly did Katie Porter say that was not true?

True. Republicans lie about guns all the time.

​@@mumbaijazzwell is seems like the law maker is lie alot. If you shot a gun and it blows up and injured you. You can sue the the gun company

@@joshuaoverlord5327 sad you missed so many points.

Good point 👍

Exactly right. Well said.

So your saying the guns were doing exactly what they were designed to do. So things that acidently kill people should be banned or changed, but things designed to kill shouldn't be regulated? That sounds so so logical.

@@distanceismyplastercast - The gun doesn't "accidently" kill anyone... the negligent (or intention) actions of the PERSON is what results in the unintentional death. For someone attacking other people's logic, you should probably leave your emotions out of the discussion.

@@johnhermann7498 True but no one has ever shot someone without a gun. Also no one can predict who will be next person who will shoot someone. So letting any nutter who wants a gun, have any type of gun they like, cannot be considered as anything like smart. So maybe you live in the dumbest nation on Earth.

Just too smart for you people.

Yes, she is wonderful

She doesn't even state how many millions of lives are saved every year from good citizens with guns.

@@artificialintelligence143 Sir this is another book.This about stopping the madness that is mass shootings.When I was in school. I didn't have to worry about mass shootings.It is sick beyond belief that a country that put a man on the moon.Or sent probs to check out the solar system.No sir and this happens in no other country on earth.Maybe we should jailing the parents of these physcopaths parents .

@@ericoxner8333 Agree, what would solve it is one exit for schools. Metal detectors and a qualified guard. What's one or two more employees if it could secure a school ground?

😂😂😂😂

With a rock for a brain

@@4phishn dude she’s chew and you up and spit you out with her intelligence.

Agreed, I have a lot of respect for her, however when someone responds in kind she interrupts them and will not allow them to respond to her questions. How will people like you defend yourselves when the $#!t hits the fan. If you know her tell her to cut out the carbs. @@traceyhall1097

@@4phishn: She is one of the smartest members of Congress….and certainly smarter than, and more articulate than any of the GOP MAGA cult member members of Congress.

Get out of America tyrant , you deserve no rights of the constitution. Every law abiding citizens have the the right to carry , bear arms . In America! Go to china , Venezuela, take yourself and family there , see how well that works for you .

So everything else in the world has to be changed just so you can have your toys? Guess after today, you think streets should have a bullet proof roof, so nutters can't shoot people from up on buildings?

Once more for the folks in the cheap seats: It's a school, not a prison. The way to make a school safer is to make it harder for any yahoo to get a gun, carry it concealed, and not have any training or even require a permit or license. All of which are proposals that republicans are in favor of and have passed in some states.

Hey, let's go all the way! Not only harden the schools (whatever the hell "harden means"), let's harden the movie theatres, the malls, the offices and open areas where mass shootings have and could happen. Arm the teachers and staff? Sure! By the way, when the teacher is assaulted by a student, something that's happening at an alarming rate, is the teacher justified in shooting to kill in defense? And, in those states where unlicensed open carry is the law, can the armed student respond with gunfire? Just asking. I'm all for cracking down on criminals - we could make it harder for them to get their hands on a gun, for instance. And I agree that mental health issues are a problem, but we have to define what a mental health problem might be. As an example, I think that a single-minded focus on fire power and a dedication to having a killing device always at the ready might be an indicator of poor mental health. What do you think? And here's a sticky issue - In virtually every case of mass shootings, the perpetrator, up to the moment when he pulled the trigger, was a law-abiding citizen. As to 2nd Amendment rights, I believe every gun owner should have to serve in the militia. A careful reading of the Amendment seems to indicate that. Other than these few reservations, you and I are in full agreement.

Legal owners of guns is allowed. Porter said it. In what way is it disarming anyone? Go get a license and quit being a baby.

Yes, and?

There are already laws about modification of cars and if a car is found to be unsafe the manufacturer is required to recall and/or fix the problem vehicles. Also, we require that anyone who uses a car be trained in their operation and licensed. So, no. Katie Porter is not against cars. But I would guess that she would like it if we could regulate guns the same way we regulate cars.

I'm using a tablet to write this,if I use it to beat someone to death then it's an "assault tablet".

Only A right if you're apart of a WELL REGULATED militia

@@dion1score kind of a catch 22 as the government has reclassified / redefined / re-1984'ed that shit as Domestic Terror groups and use PATCON as a way of persuading violence, then prosecute and/or strip further rights from the citizens as a whole with that as the justification. More importantly, NO-ONE-INDIVIDUAL should leave their lives in other's hands. We are responsible for ourselves. If Heads of the family, then it is our familial obligation

@@dion1score how else can a militia exist without the tools first? What is a militia without it? They can't regulate a militia.

@@dion1scoreThe SCOTUS has already ruled that the right of the people is independent of militia membership. And when the Constitution was written, "WELL REGULATED" meant well trained. Ignorance results in ignorant opinions.

Yes that is a great statement. If the manufacturer didn't have immunity, their lawyers would've placed that statement stating as such to remove their liability. Instead, they can sell a deadly product and they're immune from jump street from any litigation. They have no incentive to use warning or feature labels.

Warning labels should be routine on guns. Gun manufacturers should know that a lot of people who buy guns don't know how to operate them safely, and some firearms can't be fired without a magazine, and some can. There is nothing wrong with requiring warning labels like any other product; it is common sense. Also, gun manufacturers should not be immune to lawsuits.

FYI: The NRA was created to promote gun safety regulations and practices.

Good question. Leftists are a cynical people.

@randorover You are slandering and totally and completely misrepresenting the Christian (and probably Jewish) faith. I call that evil.

Reply winner for 2023, so far!!!

because cops have to carry guns? what stupid question is that? now, go beyond the limited view of self defense for a minute. Pretend you are really serious with reducing mass killings. Other countries have done this experiment and pretty much all of them have significantly reduced it, What do you think they all did to achieve this. i think you know the answer. Let us not pretend this is just a confusing hard to solve problem

Sure it’s not the gun. It’s never the gun.

And what about all the other murderers who WERE trained on gun safety? Who let their rage and emotions overpower their logic. What do you say to the loved ones of THOSE murderers' victims? See how you're always finding yourself searching for any opportunity to justify being allowed to own tools which are designed with a specific purpose to kill? Think about the kids. YOUR kids. Your neighbors. Your elderly parents. Churchgoers. And for WHAT? All of this to protect a right that you gave WAY too much credence to - especially when you consider that you have NEVER, NOT ONCE had to exercise that right in your life. Face the facts. Look at their mangled, UNIDENTIFIABLE bodies. That is all worth it to you? If so, then logic has already escaped you. You're a murderer in the making.

@@misssummersalt Shut up groomer.

she did answer , she said yes...so she lied. whats the issue that she didnt allow her to explain why she lied?

@@cocobee1313It's not the knife. It's never the knife. It's not the car. It's never the car. Firearms can be used to save lives or take lives. They are used about 5X as often to save a life as take a life. If you take guns away from citizens, you will end up with more innocents dying.

Is there a constitutinal right to chocolate eggs? Can you explain why the right of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves should be restricted under the delusional belief that violent criminals obey laws?

@@pr073u569 I'm just pointing out some of the silliness of the laws. Sure, violent criminals do not obey laws. I can go for that. That being said - I just find it silly that a chocolate egg is too dangerous to allow - yet a child can have a gun. It simply does not make sense.

@@raymanbacchus A child can have a gun? What? You are obfuscating the reasoning by playing ignorant. Children aren't allowed to purchase guns. The egg was banned because it had a choking hazard in an item designed for children. Guns are designed to sling metal at great speed - not for enticing children in the checkout line. There are reasons - you just choose to ignore them.

@@raymanbacchus the issue is that the US Constitution is not a document of laws. It's a document of rights which are not granted by the government. They're granted by birth. Once you understand that, you'll understand why laws can be silly, but rights are not.

@@jchamberlainhome Interestingly enough, rights are NOT guaranteed at birth simply because a piece of parchment says so. You need a GOVERNMENT of LAWS to enforce said piece of parchment or you don't have rights at all. I think you're missing that part of your argument.

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Hell Ya! Shes a frickin' rock star!!

@@DownstairsDoddsreally

🤡

Look I like Katie… but I feel for this woman emotionally she is obviously a bit taken aback at Katie’s claims that she lied under oath. Im not saying that she did or didn’t lie. But if someone brought up that you lied under oath in a previous statement in past years. You’d probably get a little bit shaken and so I feel for this woman. And I wish Katie and her could’ve been respectful.

@@magnusb9783 How is she being disrespectful for calling someone out for lying? It's kind of her job to cut through the bs. In my opinion she wasn't insulting or condescending, just told it like it is. She didn't make fun of her, call her names, or yell. Plus lying in a statement to government is a crime.

looking for Part 2. I want to hear it ALL. It's a Big Deal to accuse some1 of Perjury, Especially In THIS setting.

@@dawnmarie1980 Find the original testimony the woman presented that she is v=being accused of lying about. Pretty easy to fact check.

@@justsomedudeyouknow8372 right, but she didn’t even pursue that. If Katie believes she did lie under oath. The rifle activist woman or whatever even asked Katie if she was… anyways, I just didn’t like this interaction from Any sides, including the presiding chairwoman... I mean, I don’t know to expect I just I like some/ a lot of Katie porter’s stuff but this entire situation was really tense and uncomfortable. So I’m just trying to be neutral and say I see where all participating were coming from and I wish it wasn’t so tense

Her entire Argument doesn't make sense period in all very examples, she's assuming that The item being used is being properly used per the manufacturer's guidance period but we all know that firearms all ship with locks and safety manuals that layout all the gun safety laws, including treat every weapon as if it's loaded. Not to mention that it also states that children shouldn't be using the firearms. Her argument is just a flat out lie.

Sounds like parents not teaching their child safe gun handling nor reading THE INSTRUCTIONS and/or securing the gun from an irresponsible child

We need to pass a law that before u bring a gun into your home u must have a safe to store it in. And the head of the household is responsible for the guns stored in safe. If someone uses the guns to kill someone the head of household is also responsible. But that will never happen makes to much sence....

I agree. But there are some “parents” who leave loaded guns within reach of a three year old. This happened in Indiana.These “adults” shouldn’t have guns either.

The Supreme Court has already ruled in Heller that you cannot mandate the use of any kind of gun lock.@@garylovelace711

Cow

@@krotchlickmeugh627 not exactly.

U Next Tuesday porter.

Capable!

Cow?

Wut a Repugnant attitude

@Husky just a little confused?

@Husky better not visit China or the middle east then....

@Husky You should probably go hide in your basement.

@Husky guns already exist. Your comment on banning then seems to defy common sense.

@Husky if you don't like American having rights leave. It's one of our God given rights.

Government is MEANT to be reason. Except for this era's dolts, willing to run for office with no clue about leadership, history, consensus, law, social priorities. MAGAs, just listen to friends or people they think are cute or funny. Trump is a bone-head, he seems ill, and thank goodness his time is done.

What fascist wrote that ?

The actual quote from George Washington is, "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence,-it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action" As to "irresponsible action", I refer you to the 12-year olds that the GOP voters put in power.

Or the senile octogenarian president the Dems have gotten elected after lying their way through the last election.

the United States Constitution states otherwise.....to put it in simple terms for you morons, ******** "Don't let the government become the master instead of the servant." - Milton Friedman. WE the People don't pay these morons to RULE over us.

Can you explain why Democrats constantly want to restrict the ability of the law-abiding to defend themselves under the delusional notion that violent criminals obey laws? Why are leftists such big fans of lying about and strawmanning witnesses and then refusing to let them explain the situation? Do you think this makes you look good to anyone outside your echo chamber of arrogant ignorance?

If that were true she would not have been so desperate to prevent the witness from responding. She was obviously being dishonest, and I don't believe for a moment that you're dumb enough to have fallen for her tricks. You're just pretending to be more stupid than you actually are to score political points lol

Who cares

Those idiots should have never put the 2nd amendment in there, but of course they could not have known we would misuse its meaning hundreds of years later as if we are still fighting the British using muskets.

You have a first amendment right to freedom of speech. Doesn’t mean you can say anything and get away with it. Perjury, verbal harassment, etc. are still illegal. I don’t see why second amendment should be any different. Guns are still commercially sold objects and should be regulated to ensure maximum safety (by both gun design and ownership).

@@claudiusatlas8083 they are heavily regulated already. The issue is in the lack of anyone who believes in future regulation having a rational definition of what needs to be done and with what kinds of guns and from what type of study. Hysteria about guns has made more people buy them not less. Also, a focus on the mass numbers of black kids being shot in inner cities is just as important as freedom of speech. Don't you?

@@claudiusatlas8083they are ov😊er regulated in some cities

She expects them to shut down or only sell to government agencies, just like all antigun politicians.

Using a finger print lock come to mind.

What do you think drug dealers are supposed to do to stop kids using them, or stop drugs from hurting kids?

@@josiah_jackson though to be fair, drugs can be far less harmful than guns. I'd much prefer taking a hit from a joint than a gun.

No, the known side effects of drugs are clearly printed on warning labels and appear in advertisements--but you have to read them!

If and when pharmaceutical companies fail to warn of the risks of their products, there are laws in place that will hold the companies accountable. Currently those laws are not allowed to be applied to gun manufacturers. Your argument actually underlines the need for legislation like this.

You want to regulate guns like cars? let's do it.

There's no greater hate than Christian love...

@@maxsteel32 Actually, have you ever purchased a weapon or attempted to get a CPL / CWP? If you have then you'd know that its a bit more difficult then purchasing a car.

@Christian Toth good guy with car will never get in the way of a bad guy. It could be determined as the good guys fault and end up in jail.

@@maxsteel32 If you can't sue the car company for causing the event, you can't sue the gun company for causing the event.

Wrong. The same way you can't sue Ford if a drunk driver hurts someone, you can't sue Smith & Wesson if someone commits crimes with a product they made. That has nothing to do with the manufacturer. Now, if a firearm accidentally injures someone due to a manufacturing defect, they can still 100% be sued, just like a manufacturer of any other defective product.

Kids aren't supposed to be handling guns. Sounds like an irresponsible parent problem.

@@414Chevy bullshit. Stfu.

@@414Chevy "An irresponsible parent problem" will be the cause of the death of a child from another family and could be the death of hundreds of children in a school. We Americans do support individual freedom, but only to the extent that it doesn't suppress another individual's freedom. I love how people want to protect unborn children more than they do school-aged children. A child is more likely to die from a gun shot than an abortion.

@@nikhilnagboth8425 Ohh you're one of those. Okay. Did you know half to 60% of the 40k so called gun violence deaths are SUICIDES. We don't have a gun problem, we have a mental health problem. If someone really wants to kill themselves, they will find a way, even if they can't get a gun. Yeah irresponsible parents that let there children have access to their guns is a bad parent problem. Stop blaming an inanimate object. Have yet to see a gun jump off a table and randomly start shooting people.

If there were any. Unfortunately, there were no such wide spread side effects. There were a lot of rumors and lies, but you can't sue for lies, rumors and false facts.

​@@johnlreim I would say this didn't age well...but you literally wrote it yesterday, and with all the information that has come to light...you're either a shill, insane, or a troll.

@@johnlreim wow, how much does Pfizer freakin' pay trolls like you?????????????

@@johnlreim there are proven side effects from heard damage to deaths! While the left and their propaganda wing does everything to hide this!

Switch topics to try to cause conflict! This is it about vaccines. It's about guns.

Tonight, we cover the story of a person equating hand-operated guns to sitting bodies of water, and thought this was a genuinely great line of thought. More on this disturbing case, this evening at 6. Back to you, Mark.

That is apples vs oranges. Accidents can occur with both however there happens to be more firearms in the United States then there are people. They are obviously small compared to pools and if not mandated to be locked up kids WILL find them.

They do when the car causes them that's why they INVESTIGATE car accidents. They also hole people criminally responisble as well as revoke licenses.

Yep, another good guy with a gun turned out not to be so good and killed people in the street at 4th July parade. Good old American exceptionalism. No other country has laws that enable mass killers to reach their full potential.

thats what you heard huh?

Maybe they should talk about locking up criminals in Chicago

Yet here we are and there’s another School Mass Shooting in Nashville and the weapon of choice is an AR-15. The Assault Rifle ban would save lives! Guns are the number one cause of death among Children under 21. Facts. Porter’s reasoning is spot on! This rude Gun Nut has no reason. She’s just idiotic Gun lobbyists shill!

​@randorover or just look at the numbers harder. School shootings are very rare, but astronomically overreported for an issue as small as it is.

@@joshuaallen9501 When were you last attending school? Because I was a freshmen when Columbine happened. It was bad enough dealing with classes and bullies without wondering if some other kid who got bullied was gonna choose today to come settle the score.

@@TheKyrix82 you are far more likely to kill yourself with a gun than be murdered by someone else with a gun, and very few gun homicides are mass shootings. The media made school shootings seem like a big deal when it's simply not. They did the same with covid- make the situation seem like something that it's not.

@@randorover-zk7pwok, you are not to bright. Go live in Russia as they don’t allow guns