How Did Catholicism Start?

  Рет қаралды 2,348,192

Captivating History

Captivating History

Жыл бұрын

Join the Captivating History Book Club: bit.ly/3TMmpU2
Get a FREE mythology bundle ebook covering Greek, Norse, and Egyptian mythology here:
www.captivatinghistory.com/ebook
You can get the audiobook version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
You can get the paperback version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
And the ebook version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
The Catholic Church has a history that spans over two thousand years, and it began with none other than Jesus Christ himself. At least, that is what modern popes believe. But at first, there was just one church, and there was no division between Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and other branches of Christianity. Christians all over the known world were united, and together, they made their spirituality bloom. Their religion took over the lives of villagers, nobles, kings, queens, and even newly-arrived pagan armies that came to conquer Europe.
See all captivating history books here:
www.amazon.com/author/captiva...
Follow us on Facebook: / captivatinghistory
Follow us on Twitter: @CaptivHistory

Пікірлер: 13 000
@AndrewEvenstar
@AndrewEvenstar 8 ай бұрын
Just toured Spain ,Italy and eastern Orthodox countries , then Israel , Jerusalem and Bethlehem - been to most of the historic areas Jesus walked and was born and crucified ....continuing my studies of religion and history . thank you!
@kharris9359
@kharris9359 8 ай бұрын
Next go to the sites of the first seven original churches in western Anatolia.
@antonypelling9194
@antonypelling9194 7 ай бұрын
READ ! Timothy ch.4 ,v.1-3 ............"TEACHINGS OF DEMONS "....... & "forbidding TO MARRY ", read , MATHEW CH.23. V 9 Do not call ANYONE on earth FATHER. !!
@kuran-kerim5444
@kuran-kerim5444 7 ай бұрын
According to the Holy Quran, Jesus didn't claim that he was the son of Allah(God) But He said... Zuhruf 64 I seek refugee in Allah from the Satan. In the name of Allah ,Rahman ,Rahim "Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. This is a straight path." ----------------- And on the resurrection day Allah will ask Jesus about the Christian faith. Quran - Maaide 116-118 And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (gods) besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness. If You should punish them - indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them - indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. ---------------- If you love Jesus, accept him as a Messenger not as the God and not as the son of Allah. If you are follower of Jesus, believe in Messenger Muhammad, too. Because that's what he really wants you to do. And he heralded the coming of Messenger Muhammed. Jesus said to his people this👇👇👇 Quran -Saff -6 And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic." Quran -Women 171 O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. ---------------------------- I invite you to be a Muslim. Latest, last and only valid religion in the Hereafter. First step is to say "I witness that there is no god but ALLAH, and i witness that Mohammad is Messenger of Allah" and believe in this. Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah doesn't accept the existence of false deities and He orders humanity to believe in only one God, Him. He explains why it is impossible the existence of gods other than Him in Holy Quran in chapter Isra which means The Night Journey and in chapter Enbiya which means Prophets. Quran-Isra-43 Say, [O Muhammad], "If there had been with Him [other] gods, as they say, then they [each] would have sought to the Owner of the Throne a way." Exalted is He and high above what they say by great sublimity. The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [Allah] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving. Quran-Prophets-22 Had there been within the heavens and earth gods besides ALLAH, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe. -------------------- Six Pillars of Faith in Islam 1-To believe in Omnipotent Allah (GOD) (without ascribing partners to Him. Without saying "He has a son." Without saying "He has a helper out of weakness") 2-Angels (Without giving them woman names. Without saying "They are daughters of Allah") 3-All Holy Scriptures (Books revealed by Allah) 4-All Messengers (accepting them as human beings not gods or sons of God) 5-Judgement Day (Resurrection Day) 6-Destiny Five Pillars of Islam 1- SHAHADA To say "I witness that there is no god save Allah, and i witness that Muhammad is His Messenger." 2- SALAT To perform prayer 5 times a day. 3- SAWM Fasting in the month Ramadan according to lunar calendar. (29-30 days) 4- ZAKAT If you are rich you give alms to poor people. 5- HAJJ To make the pilgrimage to Mecca, Kaba if you can afford. You become a pilgrim after this visit.
@jonathanstaley3883
@jonathanstaley3883 7 ай бұрын
Allah is satan. Islam was invented by satan to try undermine the one and only true God and Jesus. Please read. Exodus 20 1-5 The existence of allah and mohumad is a blasphemy to the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus says NOBODY comes to the Father EXCEPT through ME! The only way to salvation is through repentance of your sins and belief that the Lord Jesus Christ Yeshua died on the cross for our sins and iniquity and was raised back to life on the third day (as witnessed by hundreds) your salvation is not by works or how many times a day you pray but through the blood of Christ JESUS who died for YOU and me. I will pray for you brother. You must repent, reject Islam and follow JESUS, the son of David and Abraham!
@JaguarKing1
@JaguarKing1 7 ай бұрын
I'll see you as a Muslim soon
@rutherglenroad8109
@rutherglenroad8109 Жыл бұрын
Studying the history of the Orthodox Christians is a worthwhile exercise for people interested in Christian history. We in the West tend to ignore this side of Christianity, but that's a mistake if we're really interested in origins of our faith.
@sewwhat6525
@sewwhat6525 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely agree the reason the early heresies were in the East is that’s where most of the battles over beliefs was waged Rome was pretty much a backwater in comparison to Constantinople
@luismanuelpotencianonorato9672
@luismanuelpotencianonorato9672 Жыл бұрын
​@@sewwhat6525 En Occidente es muy antiarrianismo por la herejía que duró más en el reino visigodo y lombardo.
@greglongmore6503
@greglongmore6503 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I've been having these thoughts, mostly for conversion reasons. Unbelievers will throw this stuff at you all day but also it really is quite interesting. For example as you state as much as I disagree with Catholic doctrine(s) I cannot discount the fact that I wouldn't know anything about Christ if the CC were not is it was in terms of dominance. It's where I step back and just trust that God knows what he is doing.
@margaretoconnor7077
@margaretoconnor7077 Жыл бұрын
​@@greglongmore6503 So you disagree with the Catholic teachings, do you? Hmm, so what is it ? You disagree with is it about divorce perhaps? Jesus was really clear about that! Matthew 19: 9 Now I say this to you: anyone who divorces his wife -- I am not speaking of an illicit marriage -- and marries another, is guilty of adultery.'
@margaretoconnor7077
@margaretoconnor7077 Жыл бұрын
​@@greglongmore6503 About Idolatry Exodus 20:4 You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters. The Lord did not prohibit statues; he prohibited worshiping them. God actually commanded the making of images. Just five chapters later, God commanded Moses to build the Ark of the Covenant, which would contain the presence of God and was to be venerated as the holiest place in all of Israel. Here is what God commanded Moses concerning the statues on it: And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends (Ex. 25:18-19). In Numbers 21:8-9, not only did our Lord order Moses to make another statue in the form of a bronze serpent, but he commanded the children of Israel to look at it in order to be healed. The context of the passage is one where Israel had rebelled against God, and a plague of deadly snakes was sent as a just punishment. This statue of a snake had no power of itself-we know from John 3:14 that it was merely a type of Christ-but God used this image of a snake as an instrument to effect healing in his people. Further, in 1 Kings 6, Solomon built a temple for the glory of God, described as follows: In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. . . . He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. . . . He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers, in the inner and outer rooms. . . . For the entrance to the inner sanctuary he made doors of olivewood. . . . He covered the two doors of olivewood with carvings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers; he overlaid them with gold (1 Kgs. 6:23, 27, 29, 31, 32). King Solomon ordered the construction of multiple images of things both “in heaven above” (angels) and “in the earth beneath” (palm trees and open flowers). After the completion of the temple, God declared he was pleased with its construction (1 Kgs. 9:3). It becomes apparent, given the above evidence, that a strictly literal interpretation of Exodus 20:2-5 is erroneous. Otherwise, we would have to conclude that God prohibits something in Exodus 20 and elsewhere commands the very same thing. Why would God use these images of serpents, angels, palm trees, and open flowers? Why didn’t he heal the people directly rather than use a “graven image”? Why didn’t he command Moses and Solomon to build an ark and a temple without any images at all? First, God knows what his own commandments mean. He never condemned the use of statues absolutely. Second, God created man as a being who is both spiritual and physical. To draw us to himself, God uses both spiritual and physical means. He will use statues, the temple, or even creation itself to guide us to our heavenly home. Psalm 19:1 tells us: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Romans 1:20 says: “Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.” Gazing at a sunset-or a great painting of a sunset-and contemplating the greatness of God through the beauty of his creation is not idolatry. Nor is it idolatrous to look at statues of great saints of old and honor them for the great things God has done through them. It is no more idolatrous for us to desire to imitate their holy lives and honor them than it was for Paul to exhort the Corinthians to imitate his own holy life (1 Cor. 4:16) and to “esteem very highly” those who were “over [the Thessalonians] in the Lord and admonish [them]” (1 Thess. 5:12-13). Having statues honoring God or great saints brings to mind. For Catholics, having statues is just as natural as-having pictures in our wallets to remind us of the ones we love here on earth. But reminding ourselves of loved ones is a far cry from idolatry.
@mawi3869
@mawi3869 6 ай бұрын
There are lots of inaccuracies in this video; subtle but important. The first clue to anyone paying attention is the use of Common Era (CE) and BCE instead of AD and BC. Christians would never do that.
@nbenefiel
@nbenefiel Ай бұрын
Any modern scholar uses CE and BCE.
@WilliamJones-sf5pt
@WilliamJones-sf5pt Ай бұрын
@@nbenefiel And for what reason should they stop calling the presocratics - the philosophers before Socrates - by the name of presocratics? Catholics will so easily follow after the communists. It is a marriage made in heaven.
@gdiaz8827
@gdiaz8827 Ай бұрын
​Any modem woke scholar​@@nbenefiel
@WilliamJones-sf5pt
@WilliamJones-sf5pt Ай бұрын
@David19746 Why? Most of us don't feel it is normal driving from orgy too orgy hopping from bed to bed from filthy harlot to filthy harlots. That's why. We shouldn't just change things just because a radical pointy headed professor thinks we should.
@nbenefiel
@nbenefiel 9 күн бұрын
@@WilliamJones-sf5pt The early Christians lived communally and shared their incomes. We haven’t done that since the fourth century.
@SadelovesJesus
@SadelovesJesus 2 ай бұрын
It’s videos like this that really magnify the importance of knowing and reading the Word of God for yourself…
@nosuchthing8
@nosuchthing8 Ай бұрын
Mathew 17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[b] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[c] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[d] loosed in heaven Rock/peter/cepha
@blindside398
@blindside398 Ай бұрын
There are so many things wrong in this video!
@buenobaniaga4023
@buenobaniaga4023 Ай бұрын
MATTHEW CHAPTER 16: VERSE 18.ARE 3 PARTS #1. THE CHANGING NAME OF SIMON BAR-JONAH > SIMON CEPHAS [ JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 41- 42.] #2. THE ANOUCEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY AGAINST HELL AND THE GLORIOUS LIFE. IN VERSE 21. REPEATING VERSE 18.#1. THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH #2. 2ND THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT RESURRECTION THESE WAS CONFIRMED AND ATTESTED BY APOSTLE PAUL IN 1ST CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 15: ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES [ PLURAL SCRIPTURES FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT 1. GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 15. THE BIRTH OF THE HOLY SEED SACRIFICE. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE LAMB < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 21. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY OF LIFE < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 24. ISAIAH CHAPTER 6: VERSE 13.THE HOLY SEED ISAIAH CHAPTER 7: VERSE 14 ISAIAH CHAPTER 8: VERSE 14- VERSE 16 ISAIAH CHAPTER 9: VERSE 6 ISAIAH CHAPTER 40: VERSE 3,VERSE 23. ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11 ISAIAH CHAPTER 43: VERSE 10,VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 44: VERSE 6,VERSE 8 ISAIAH 45: VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 53: VERSE 10, VERSE 15 LUKE CHAPTER 1: VERSE 35.THE HOLY SEED MATTHEW CHAPTER 1: VERSE 18 THE HOLY SEED LUKE CHAPTER 2: VERSE 32 MATTHEW CHAPTER 12: VERSE 21.[ ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1, VERSE 6,VERSE 11. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE PLAN OF REDEMPTION AND SALVATION> MALACHI CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11.> ACTS CHAPTER 9: VERSE 5,VERSE 15,VERSE 17-18. < JOHN CHAPTER 10: VERSE 16.LETTER B.,JOHN CHAPTER 15: VERSE 20.,JOHN CHAPTER 17: VERSE 20., JOHN CHAPTER 20: VERSE 21.I.N.G, VERSE 29.LETTER B. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE REDEMPTION AND SALVATION. ) ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 18,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. THE 1ST APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE HOLY SEED , IN THE NEW TESTAMENT #2. 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < ISAIAH CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16,VERSE 19. JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19,VERSE 21,VERSE 22. MATTHEW CHAPTER 10: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 26: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: THE 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY #3. THE 3RD APPEARING OF GOD SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING OF GOD> LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27. NO LONGER AS LAMB, NO LONGER AS PRIEST, NO LONGER AS PRINCE, BUT LORD OF lords, KING OF kings, GOD OF gods < JOSHUA CHAPTER 22: VERSE 22., JEREMIAH CHAPTER 10: VERSE 10. 2ND THESALONIANS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 8. ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23., MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.THE LORD GOD ALL MIGHTY. 🙏 HE SHALL COME AND REIGN IN MOUNT OF OLIVES 🫒 MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23.LETTER C. IN MOUNT ZION, IN JERUSALEM, IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱, NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE PARTS OF THE EARTH/ GLOBE/ WORLD. TO REIGN 1,000 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
@buenobaniaga4023
@buenobaniaga4023 Ай бұрын
LIKE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT GOD APPEARED TO PROPHET ABRAHAM 3XTIMES IN DIFFERENT WAYS [ NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY, BUT IN DIFFERENT TIMES OF SITUATIONS] #1. 1ST APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 14: VERSE 18. IN PRIESTHOOD APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 2,VERSE 20. IN ANGELIC JUDGE APPEARANCE IN GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 14. HE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM AND SARAH TO COMING BACK AGAIN. #3. 3RD APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM IN GENESIS CHAPTER 21: VERSE 1. IN LIFE APPEARANCE. THE SAME IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 3XTIMES APPEARANCE #1. 1ST APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 1:VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 28,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. AS SACRIFICE LAMB APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19, VERSE 21,VERSE 22., MATTHEW CHAPTER 10:: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 16: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: AS GLORIFIED BODY [ OF THE HOLY SEED < JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 24., JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 28., JOHN CHAPTER 13:: VERSE 31- VERSE 32., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 22., JUDAS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 3, VERSE 9,VERSE 20.THE MOST HOLY FAITH. #3. 3RD APPEARING SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27 LUKE CHAPTER 21: VERSE 25- 26 MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. MATTHEW CHAPTER 25: REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18, REVELATIONS CHAPTER 19: ISAIAH CHAPTER 24 VERSE 23. AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9. DANIEL CHAPTER 7: VERSE 9,VERSE 13. IN GLORIOUS ANCIENTS DAYS, ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23. IN ANCIENTS GLORIOUSLY REIGN. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
@nubwaxer1
@nubwaxer1 Ай бұрын
fairytales
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
2:43 Already had a reputation as a political and religious agitator, especially among the Romans. Where do they get this? Mk.15:10 indicates that Pilate knew that it was from envy that the religious leaders delivered him up, and all 4 Gospels have Pilate wanting to release him because didn't find cause for saying he was a political agitator. So the Romans knew that his agitation was religious but not political. He said "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to what is God's
@stallionsb
@stallionsb Жыл бұрын
My thought as well. Good catch
@bkh5746
@bkh5746 Жыл бұрын
Its good place to send your son whos caught masterbating to gay porn.he will fit right in.
@lookitsluke433
@lookitsluke433 Жыл бұрын
EXACTLY. I was just going to say this… In fact, the Romans didn’t care at all about Jesus when he was preaching
@pannellclara
@pannellclara Жыл бұрын
👏🏼 right on however the Romans feared the rising of Jesus’s followers because they were willing to die for the faith so in order to control the people they created the Catholic church in order to embrace the christian’s & have the control- there’s many documentary’s about this, & it makes sense - the catholic church doesn’t even follow Jesus’s teachings why? because they truly didn’t know the truth & the way which is Jesus! they worship Mary not Jesus
@wmden1
@wmden1 Жыл бұрын
I did a double take on that too. Christ was no politician, or governmental political agitator, at all, though he did get under the skin of the Pharisees and Sadducees, quite often, which was a good thing, but it got him crucified. I still picture those Jewish religious leaders saying to each other, "We got him. No more trouble from him."
@timeisapathwalkingtounderstand
@timeisapathwalkingtounderstand Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video here in New York City watching 2023 8:23 a.m. Wednesday March 22
@nadiaestrella2153
@nadiaestrella2153 7 ай бұрын
Here in New York City watching 2023 9:21 p.m. Thursday September 21
@timeisapathwalkingtounderstand
@timeisapathwalkingtounderstand 7 ай бұрын
@@nadiaestrella2153 LMFAO🤣 thank you for reading my comment here in New York City reading yours Friday September 22nd 1:16 p.m. drinking coffee and walking on 14th Street Union Square heading for the train station to disappear LOL🤣
@dillonstith6427
@dillonstith6427 2 ай бұрын
⁠@@timeisapathwalkingtounderstandI’m watching the video and reading you comment here in Luxembourg, Europe at 1:50am Thursday March 7th needing to get some sleep but chuckling reading your comments. Much love ❤
@SecretsOfScripture
@SecretsOfScripture 4 ай бұрын
In the face of adversity, you found strength, redemption, and a new purpose in life. 🙏💪 It's truly remarkable to see how your life has been turned around.
@rebirthofthecool5619
@rebirthofthecool5619 3 ай бұрын
In the face of common sense you believe a fairytale
@benandolga
@benandolga 3 ай бұрын
Actually, Paul was highly educated Luke was a physician (not a sinner from the street or poor man) Matthew was a definitely educated and wealthy man working in “irs” so to speak
@Godlvr008
@Godlvr008 Жыл бұрын
Correction: John wrote John and was a disciple from the beginning."That which we have SEEN and HEARD from the beginning" Eyewitnesses. Matthew was a tax collector(educated) disciple. Mark wrote Peters recollections around 60 AD(peter crucified 67). Luke was a doctor who interviewed eyewitnesses including Mary. Your commentary on Jesus dual nature was accurate.
@nosuchthing8
@nosuchthing8 Жыл бұрын
Luke was a doctor?
@adstryker5084
@adstryker5084 Жыл бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 Yep, a "Greek" (or non-Jewish) doctor. The other 3 gospel accounts were written by Jews. Luke's gospel is arranged more like a historical account, mostly in temporal order. The other three are arranged thematically, with less regard for how events unfolded along the timeline.
@Orange6921
@Orange6921 Жыл бұрын
There were several direct inaccuracies about what is written in the NT. I get the impression the makers got most of this from 2nd hand sources as opposed to taking it directly from the NT and the Gospels. There is no other book in the world where the 2nd hand accounts of the text is more inaccurate that the Bible. Both books and secular scholars just flat out claim the exact opposite of what the text says on a regular basis. And its goes totally unquestioned.
@Orange6921
@Orange6921 Жыл бұрын
Luke lived and worked many years along side Paul and the Apostles, the opening of his gospel makes clear he worked diligently with purpose to record a declaration of the first hand eyewitnesses of Christ from the beginning and give assurance that the order and detail of these things are for certain. The vid also said "illiterate" fisherman. WOW That is grossly inaccurate as most fishermen were basically small business owners who had to be literal to run their business under the Roman Empire. Fisherman were in fact more literal and better educated than the average citizen.
@josueamaya5538
@josueamaya5538 Жыл бұрын
I can see that the guy who tells the story, didn't read the bible.
@deborahrose5369
@deborahrose5369 11 ай бұрын
I think you mean Ignatius of Antioch when referring to his letter of 108. It looks like you have a picture of Ignatius of Loyola who was not born until 1491.
@georgebentonjr3876
@georgebentonjr3876 9 ай бұрын
Born again, or to experience the new birth, is a phrase, particularly in evangelicalism, that refers to a "spiritual rebirth", or a regeneration of the human spirit. In contrast to one's physical birth, being "born again" is distinctly and separately caused by the operation of the Holy Spirit. John 3:3
@dan_m7774
@dan_m7774 Ай бұрын
Yet Jesus explained being born again is by baptism, thus naming water and the spirit. Not some made up self pronouncement.
@georgebentonjr3876
@georgebentonjr3876 Ай бұрын
@@dan_m7774 The point, one can't see the kingdom of God, much less, enter into it. John 3:3 is something He does, and it's not accomplished by man, human effort. Nicodemus thought it was re-entering the womb. He had a carnal understanding on the nature of the kingdom. It doesn't come with observation. And, no one's soul salvation hinges on a piece of real estate on a piece of dirt in the middle east. 2 Corinthians 5:16; John 4:21
@thehelpdesk4051
@thehelpdesk4051 11 күн бұрын
Explained well....
@dan_m7774
@dan_m7774 11 күн бұрын
@@georgebentonjr3876 Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible.
@georgebentonjr3876
@georgebentonjr3876 11 күн бұрын
@@dan_m7774 ""Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible."" end quote. One of the reasons that Christ was a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense was because He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom: My kingdom is not of this world - John 18:36; the kingdom of God is within you - Luke 17:20-21. Clearly, the majority of the Jews missed their Messiah because they were looking for a physical kingdom. The disciples too, were looking for a physical kingdom, prior to Pentecost, they held that expectation and view. After Pentecost, when they received the Holy Spirit, Who led them "into all truth" and taught them of the "things to come," their understanding of the nature of the kingdom was enlightened, and they no longer taught of a physical kingdom. Rather, they applied spiritual interpretations to Old Testament prophecies, used them to describe the Church, and associated the kingdom with the gospel. The veil of Moses had been removed.
@paulholloway7666
@paulholloway7666 Жыл бұрын
Where do you get the idea that the 12 were Jewish and the 70(72) were gentiles? The only lists of the 70(72) that I can find with a quick Google search list both Jewish and Gentile names among the 70(72). I would be ever so grateful if you could cite your source for that claim so that I can look into it.
@chrisbundy6104
@chrisbundy6104 Ай бұрын
Good point: he would hardly have that many gentile disciples and so few Jewish ones: this looks like a later gloss
@coffeefortwo2718
@coffeefortwo2718 8 ай бұрын
I had about two minutes. The narrator says that Jesus chose 70 Gentiles, that’s not accurate and so it makes me doubt the accuracy of rest of this video. Gentiles we’re not brought in until Paul’s ministry.
@NazriB
@NazriB 41 минут бұрын
Lies again? Cup Series USD SGD
@ColeB-jy3mh
@ColeB-jy3mh 7 ай бұрын
Is there a discord server where everyone wants to go to, to discuss this?
@dantasticguy5435
@dantasticguy5435 4 ай бұрын
BTW your narrator has a great voice ..... i do the same work, but his voice totally works for your narrative! Good job
@3ggshe11s
@3ggshe11s 4 ай бұрын
Pretty sure it's not a human narrator.
@SpotlightGraphics
@SpotlightGraphics Ай бұрын
@@3ggshe11swhat makes you say that? did he mispronounce a word or just because of how good it sounds
@katphisH11
@katphisH11 15 күн бұрын
@@SpotlightGraphics It's AI, text to speech
@garthly
@garthly Жыл бұрын
As Paul’s writings preceded the gospels, it is ridiculous to claim that Paul “stripped the gospels of their Jewish content.”
@FreeinChristForever
@FreeinChristForever Жыл бұрын
I agree that Paul did not strip the gospels of their Jewish content, but the gospels happened before Paul even got saved and then later on wrote letters to different parts of the body of Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ). To say his letters preceded the gospels doesn’t make sense. But out of curiosity, what do you mean?
@ladydustin7811
@ladydustin7811 Жыл бұрын
He means Paul wrote his letters before the gospels were written
@tulenik71
@tulenik71 Жыл бұрын
@@FreeinChristForever not only it make sense, it is possible to demonstrate gospels were inspired by paulinism. Of course, hardline believers will remain in denial.
@FreeinChristForever
@FreeinChristForever Жыл бұрын
@@tulenik71 What in the world is “paulism?” Is this some new type of religion that I’ve never heard of? If you’re speaking of Paul the apostle then he’d be the first in line to be a witness AGAINST you for before he was Paul he was Saul and Saul hated ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with Christ and His followers to the point of putting them in prison to murdering them.
@nosuchthing8
@nosuchthing8 Ай бұрын
​@FreeinChristForever we all know what paulism iS. pauls take on christinaity. Focus more on faith than works, play down jewish practices like removal of foreskin, etc.
@katianntree333
@katianntree333 Жыл бұрын
On a tour recently in England , I was told that churches were built on ancient pagan sites and where the community gathered already under a yew tree, which is why there are always yew trees next to churches.
@andrewdarley8988
@andrewdarley8988 Жыл бұрын
Wrong! At the time when England depended for her military power on archers using the longbow one of the mediaeval monarchs ruled that yew trees should be grown round churches so there would be an assured supply of the wood.
@kelseythomson4418
@kelseythomson4418 Жыл бұрын
That would make sense. I'm not sure which of you is correct. I know the church did have a tendency to override pagan tradition though. So, I don't consider what you're saying out of the realm of possibility. That sounds about right though as God has been known to do that. He did that when he freed the slaves from Egypt. The feud also turned into a battle of who's God or gods were more powerful between Moses and the Priests. Each of the plagues directly corresponded with an Egyptian god and by the third one the Priests were noticably shaken. They watch the God of Moses systematically dominate each of their Gods as a display. He saved the sun and the Pharos son himself (as they were seen as gods) for last. By the end of if most of the priests had to declare that the God of the Israelites MUST be Lord. Even in modern times scientists have confirmed that the plagues can be explained by a series of natural phenomena (some of which are historically verifiable and the others make scientific sense to follow) on a much larger scale than has ever been seen. That also makes sense as the Egyptian gods were nature gods. He displayed total dominion over the earth. In the end though can you really be mad at a king for demonstrating that he IS in fact King?
@gyanendra8153
@gyanendra8153 Жыл бұрын
@@andrewdarley8988 a
@gyanendra8153
@gyanendra8153 Жыл бұрын
@@kelseythomson4418 .
@johngurvan8279
@johngurvan8279 Жыл бұрын
Christianity stole so many pagan things. Xmas day pagan festival. Jesus born in sept. Easter pagan festival. Harvest festival pagan. Then islam copied many Christian things.
@JoLa-qq5tm
@JoLa-qq5tm 2 ай бұрын
Following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, Jerusalem was rebuilt as a Roman colony under the name of Aelia Capitolina, and the province of Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina, before that it was the land of Israel.
@gershwinjcanham
@gershwinjcanham 10 ай бұрын
I loved your closing statement brother. Grace & peace to you ❤
@brentlunger9738
@brentlunger9738 2 ай бұрын
ㅁㄷㅅ: ?? 기이한
@thomasmcfarland8768
@thomasmcfarland8768 Ай бұрын
​@@SoyebAkhtar151If Jesus were a prophet, a true prophet speaks truth for God. See Mosaic Law of the prophet. Jesus said He would rise from the dead three days and nights after His death. If His prophesy is true, then His Resurrection makes Him to be God for no one, but God can raise Himself from the dead. Either He told the truth or He did not. If He did not speak the truth, why then would Muhammed call Him a great prophet?
@andrescastillo7832
@andrescastillo7832 Жыл бұрын
“You are Peter and upon this rock I will build my church”
@corsairman1956
@corsairman1956 Жыл бұрын
Jesus was referring to Peter’s confession as the foundation not Peter the man.
@vtslglen
@vtslglen Жыл бұрын
@@corsairman1956 Among all the other disciples Peter recognises Jesus as the messiah
@Powerranger-le4up
@Powerranger-le4up Жыл бұрын
@@corsairman1956 Then why did Jesus give Peter the authority to bind and loosen?
@kdmdlo
@kdmdlo Жыл бұрын
@@corsairman1956 So you're making a specific interpretation, which differs from the Church. By what authority do you make this interpretation? Are you infallible? How do you know you're right? If God gave us His inerrant word, wouldn't He have also left an inerrant interpreter, so that we wouldn't fall into arguments (like they kind you're making)?
@corsairman1956
@corsairman1956 Жыл бұрын
@@kdmdlo Hi, what ‘Church’ are you referring to?
@leedee4968
@leedee4968 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely interesting info ✝️
@chrisc5726
@chrisc5726 Жыл бұрын
An interpretive account of what you would hear in public/government education.
@nosuchthing8
@nosuchthing8 Жыл бұрын
In other words you don't know how to respond.
@andrewplater1782
@andrewplater1782 Ай бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 There are errors of fact
@nosuchthing8
@nosuchthing8 Ай бұрын
@@andrewplater1782 like what
@lacretiawilkerson8772
@lacretiawilkerson8772 8 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing
@ColeB-jy3mh
@ColeB-jy3mh 7 ай бұрын
I love the ending. All the things we agree on. As those are the things that are at least true
@ericsower7022
@ericsower7022 Жыл бұрын
"The authors of the Gospels never claimed to know the life of the Messiah?" Matthew was a disciple of Jesus. John was also the beloved disciple of Jesus.
@ericsower7022
@ericsower7022 Жыл бұрын
Jesus Christ is the Truth.
@ericsower7022
@ericsower7022 Жыл бұрын
@@apollo8352 God help you🙏
@ericsower7022
@ericsower7022 Жыл бұрын
@@apollo8352 This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true. - John 21:24
@ericsower7022
@ericsower7022 Жыл бұрын
@@apollo8352 That's impossible because God will judge the sexually immoral. Jesus Christ is sinless.
@apollo8352
@apollo8352 Жыл бұрын
@@ericsower7022 Hi there.... so what a technical discrepancy! I will tell you what, it is claimed to be the word of god and without error....for if it had errors then god would be fallible which is kind of a big thing in religion. The point I hope you see is because of 'a technical error' or blatant lies you really cannot trust Paul's scriptures to be reliable testimony. You of course know Paul did not have his claimed conversion until some time after 36AD, while the Jesus guy died in 30 or 33AD, depending on who is counting...So Paul never actually meet Jesus before his death, nor did Paul witness any of the biblical claims which is another big deal considering his scriptures make most of the main bible claims! Remember Galatians 1:11-16 Paul's scriptures contain no eye witness accounts, no information from any other person and no information from any other source, that is if you can believe Paul! See were this is going?
@davidkamara5732
@davidkamara5732 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting subject to learn and digest well.
@shaunsmith7480
@shaunsmith7480 Жыл бұрын
I wonder why the authhordox church in Ethiopia survived the Catholic establishment
@repealthepatriotact
@repealthepatriotact Жыл бұрын
Especially if uncredentialled idiots like the creator of this video post factually inaccurate information.....
@OscarRamirez-qn6dc
@OscarRamirez-qn6dc Жыл бұрын
Very nice video! Thank you for putting together all the interesting facts. Just one thing I noticed that is not accurate. At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 9 ай бұрын
In response to the goodness of the Reformation, Loyola was commissioned to found the jez-ewe-it order, whose sole mission was to suppress the truth of the reformers, who had positively identified the popes as the biblical antichrist power. This order was to use any means, including mass murder, just like the inquisitions, to accomplish this task. They are one of the most despicable groups to curse the face of the earth, so dastardly that Jefferson and Lincoln warned us about them, and even several popes outlawed them THAT'S pretty bad.
@mitchellosmer1293
@mitchellosmer1293 8 ай бұрын
quote--- At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.--unquote -----quote--- There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus.--unquote ------St. Ignatius of Antioch, also called Ignatius Theophoros (Greek: “God Bearer”), (died c. 110, Rome; Western feast day October 17; Eastern feast day December 20), bishop of Antioch, Syria (now in Turkey), known mainly from seven highly regarded letters that he wrote during a trip to Rome, as a prisoner condemned to be executed for his beliefs. He was apparently eager to counteract the teachings of two groups-the Judaizers, who did not accept the authority of the New Testament, and the docetists, who held that Christ’s sufferings and death were apparent but not real. The letters have often been cited as a source of knowledge of the Christian church at the beginning of the 2nd century. -----
@ColeB-jy3mh
@ColeB-jy3mh 7 ай бұрын
cool bro
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 7 ай бұрын
@@mitchellosmer1293 The first Ignatius sounds MUCH more sincere than Loyola, who founded the abominable jesuit order. Ignatius of Antioch was probably a sincere Christian, and not corrupted by the papacy, since Roman Catholicism did not begin until Constantine legislated it as the official state religion in AD 313. This is in contrast to the Romanist fable that the popes and the Catholic Church started with Peter.
@DadoMac
@DadoMac 5 ай бұрын
@@TIJoe-te9qu You are deceived by the false teachers, confusing the word legislated with 'founded'. Constantine legislated the church, meaning he legalized it. Jesus founded it. By the way which sect or denomination you belong to?
@goomgoom5504
@goomgoom5504 4 ай бұрын
I think your reference of Jesus travelling through Palestine is not historically accurate. Jesus traveled through Judea, also known as the land of Canaan. The people in this area called Philistines originated as an immigrant group from the Aegean (Greece) that settled in Canaan. The land was renamed in 132-136 CE, by the Roman emperor Hadrian to Syria-Palaestina, the Jews traditional enemies, as punishment for the Jews insurrection at that time.
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
2:54 gives the order of the Gospels as Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. A modern theory, but the traditional order has good historical testimony, as early as Irenaeus of Lyon, a student of Polycarp of Smyrna, who was a student of the Apostle John. Can you imagine the grandchildren of soldiers of the American Revolution not knowing who wrote the Declaration of Independence or that it came before The Constitution? That is about the time gap here three generations.
@rxw5520
@rxw5520 Жыл бұрын
Well what do you think accounts for the difference? I assume it’s modern people looking at which book appears to come from which, like Luke and Matthew appear to come from Mark and Q, for example. I assume they’re using the Greek texts? I dunno what they’re looking for specifically.
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
@@rxw5520 Q is a modern theory, very questionable, NO manuscript evidence.
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 You seem to be saying what I'm saying in your first sentence. Your 2nd sentence seems to disagree but I don't see your point. On your 3rd sentence, The gap I speak of is 3 generations and I list the 3 generations I am talking about.
@llla_german_ewoklll6413
@llla_german_ewoklll6413 Жыл бұрын
@@glstka5710 Looking back at your comment, I misread it. I apologize for the misunderstanding. But I will say that is only a two generational gap. If we speak of Irenaeus, he is two places removed from John. If there was one more before Irenaeus, and after Polycarp or John, then it would be a 3 generation gap.
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 I wasn't counting John as the 0th generation. John 1st, Polycar 2nd, Irenaeus 3rd. looks like we basically agree.
@MmmGallicus
@MmmGallicus Жыл бұрын
Not bad for such an introductory video
@thecircleandthesquare8980
@thecircleandthesquare8980 8 ай бұрын
where do they get the 70-72 gentile disciples from?
@me-ds2il
@me-ds2il Ай бұрын
According to Eusebius (father of church history) standing up at the council, he proclaimed that the gospels came from the writings if the Essenes. Wether rightly or wrongly, IDNK
@hectormunoz6052
@hectormunoz6052 Жыл бұрын
Gee , thanks for clearing that up for me .
@FromAcrossTheDesert
@FromAcrossTheDesert Жыл бұрын
8:48 The Creed can be traced back to within 20 years of Jesus death. Paul's epistle to the Corinthians expresses the Creed and its relation to the "Church of God" . In the epistles Paul speaks in further depth about the organization of the Church and speaks highly of the Church.
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 9 ай бұрын
Paul speaks highly of the church known as The Way, later known as Christians in Antioch. This is in stark contrast to the counterfeit church/state hybrid known as the papacy, which bears little resemblance to the pure, non-politically involved, popeless church of apostolic times, which did not go about killing "hetetics" in the holocaust known as the Catholic inquisitions.
@t.d6379
@t.d6379 8 ай бұрын
​@@TIJoe-te9quyou're a fool. Stop.
@anonjohn7571
@anonjohn7571 8 ай бұрын
@@TIJoe-te9qu Nothing you said even makes sense. The Holocaust was committed by German socialists not Catholics 😂 are you stupid?
@Revelation18-4
@Revelation18-4 8 ай бұрын
​@@TIJoe-te9quExactly! More people need to read Foxes Book of Martyrs !
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 8 ай бұрын
@@Revelation18-4 I don't know how papists can turn a blind eye to those ruthless mass murders done as "service to God. "
@marnavanloo7302
@marnavanloo7302 Ай бұрын
Years ago I watched a panel of theologians discussing the Bible. I came to believe the Bible speaks to each of our circumstances & we get something different from it each time we read it.
@Mutasis_Mutandis
@Mutasis_Mutandis 17 күн бұрын
It’s called “the living Word.”
@JustReed
@JustReed Ай бұрын
Let me put it this way. I'm an Ex-Catholic and Christian... there is so much to this 'story.'
@johngregory5424
@johngregory5424 Жыл бұрын
When Mary registered the birth of her baby, what year did the registrar, write down in his ledger?
@dvdortiz9031
@dvdortiz9031 Жыл бұрын
If such record existed, probably they should have entered in, 3000+. The jews today do have 5000+ in their calendar !! Did you know that? The Roman's kept tally from their own conquest days
@thomasmaughan4798
@thomasmaughan4798 Жыл бұрын
That's a question for ChatGPT
@wendylang2360
@wendylang2360 13 күн бұрын
I don't know this for sure, but I think from the old testament readings, the birth would have been registered in the year of the ruler of that time 🤔 - look at how Daniel starts 1:1 "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim King of Judah ...." That was the way the year was identified. 💒
@zubenelgenubi
@zubenelgenubi Жыл бұрын
VERY interested to examine the changes in "Christianity" between 60 A.D. and 325 A.D.!!
@Wendilane
@Wendilane Жыл бұрын
What changed?
@jeffdoyle1227
@jeffdoyle1227 11 ай бұрын
​@Wendi Lane more than you are willing to accept
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 10 ай бұрын
Yes, especially since Constantine changed Christianity into the official state religion called Catholicism in 313, and passed the first mandatory Sunday observance laws in 321, contrary to the 7th day Sabbath observed by Jesus, Paul, the rest of the apostles, the Gentiles, and of course the Jews as well.
@deanashcraft1631
@deanashcraft1631 10 ай бұрын
Paul says in Ephesians 4:5 he had spent 15 days with him fellowshiping Gal.1:8. Hosea 4:6;Amos 3:3 .Peter was handed the keys to the New Testament Church in Matthew 16:13-20 to fulfill John 17:17-20& John 3:1-8. 2Tim.2:15 ,3:15-16. Luke 24:47-48, Mk. 16:16. Acts 1:8, 2:1-4, 2:36-47. Jesus is the door to heaven. Peter has the keys ? Acts 2:38 !!! But it’s locked because of the disobedience of Adam and Eve and the devil is still roaring and roaming seeking who he may devour. 1 Cor.15:1-4 Paul declared the Gospel the same as Peter did.
@jeffdoyle1227
@jeffdoyle1227 10 ай бұрын
@deanashcraft1631 Yes, but here's the thing about the bible, though.... it's all made up. There's no reason to believe that it's God's word, and if you read it objectively then it's easy to see how there's no possibility way a perfect, all knowing all loving God had anything to do with it.
@haroldbradley7777
@haroldbradley7777 4 ай бұрын
I Subscribed how do I get the e book ebook
@johnpaul-mp7zc
@johnpaul-mp7zc 2 ай бұрын
At time 8:32 it states the church became a well defined system by the 2nd century with bishops priest and deacons. CORRECTION we read about this in the book of Acts which was written before the gospels in the 1st century.
@johnthompson5370
@johnthompson5370 Жыл бұрын
One thing you miss is that "catholic" is a Greek word for universal. So the second century writing was not about a "cathoilc" church but a universal church for all people. As a 21st century Catholic I still see our Church as a universal church for all people.
@maxwelldownham235
@maxwelldownham235 Жыл бұрын
Count me out. I threw that monkey off my back six decades ago.
@ff6605
@ff6605 Жыл бұрын
​@@maxwelldownham235 good for you never worship false idols
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu Жыл бұрын
It was "universal" in its conception by Constantine, who incorporated much paganism into his version of Christianity in order to appeal to as many people as possible, including the pagans. All those apostasies remain today. And the pope fully intends to force Romanism upon the world again, complete with compulsory Sunday laws just like in the dark ages.
@DimentedButterStick
@DimentedButterStick Жыл бұрын
@@ff6605 Catholics worship Jesus. Contrary to popular belief, the “praying to Mary” is not worship but rather intercession. “Hail Mary full of grace… pray for us sinners.” They ask Mary to pray for them. They would never do that when praying to Jesus because that’s who they are worshiping and asking for help, forgiveness, blessing etc.
@basedchango2172
@basedchango2172 Жыл бұрын
​@@ff6605 you don't worship the apostles, protestantismn isn't true Christianity
@theorthoguy9345
@theorthoguy9345 Жыл бұрын
My guy just started with professing nestorianism 😅 . If you want to discuss your opening statement please inform me in a reply
@TitanGamerMobile
@TitanGamerMobile Жыл бұрын
He definitely didn’t explain it correctly
@tonipink70
@tonipink70 10 ай бұрын
You did not include in your video about an early church father who 1st used the word katolikos in his letters.
@DaddyChetty
@DaddyChetty Жыл бұрын
Interesting info thank you
@shalaby8968
@shalaby8968 Жыл бұрын
I might disagree about that collective memory thing(exception being Luke) but 1.the gospels claim to have been an eyewitness account for the life and ministry of christ. 2.it claims to have some sort of a divine inspiration behind it.
@gtymewach9643
@gtymewach9643 Жыл бұрын
Matthew was with Jesus, John was Jesus. Whoever wrote is knowing contradiction what was actually written in the Bible. and should have stated evidence immediately. Not blatantly lied. He is also deceived the listener. All the narrator has was site this and why. Knowingly deceiving. Came to get/find evidence of how 2nd century church leaders sold out. What real evidence pro or con , you won’t find it with fictional wishing. If you want to prove something fiction, you don’t start with fiction.
@charlesdayon8420
@charlesdayon8420 Жыл бұрын
Of course, we are to understand that Jesus is like us, he understands our predicament and temptations and watches our success and failures and dis interest. And Mary His /Our mother also is watching.....O'My Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy Mercy.Amen.
@dvdortiz9031
@dvdortiz9031 Жыл бұрын
@Pat Ludwain the year 382 AD Pope Damasus I gave the world the Bible!!! 73 books total!!! 46 books in the old testament, the one that Jesus read in the synagogues every Saturday!
@steadfastunmoveable9751
@steadfastunmoveable9751 Жыл бұрын
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan. Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop. I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians. Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to. Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to. Catholics think salvation is through the works. Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5. Catholics believe in baptizing babies. Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
@glstka5710
@glstka5710 Жыл бұрын
@Pat Ludwa Mt.8:14 and Lk.4:38 also mention Peters mother-in-law.
@rickmcdonald1557
@rickmcdonald1557 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video and I enjoyed learning from it as a student of all Religions and subscribed today and thanks for your work on these subjects.
@MarcillaSmith
@MarcillaSmith Жыл бұрын
While I'm glad you enjoyed it, I found it went oddly deep into the mythology. Granted, I am in a minority here, but there was a Roman Catholic Church before the first century, and remained pagan until the latter half of the fourth century. I'm saying this as a practicing Catholic - we don't need to deny our history in order to accept our present reality.
@misscameroon8062
@misscameroon8062 Жыл бұрын
@@MarcillaSmith Marcilla where are you from; because what you say about Roman Catholic church history is pure nonsense.
@MarcillaSmith
@MarcillaSmith Жыл бұрын
@@misscameroon8062 you are strangely curious for someone who thinks it's "nonsense." :: raised eyebrow :: In any event, I'm from a universe where the official religion of the Roman Church became Christianity in 380, in accordance with the Edict of Thessalonica of emperor Theodosius I. How about you? In what year did the Roman Church become Christian in your dimension?
@misscameroon8062
@misscameroon8062 Жыл бұрын
@@MarcillaSmith I am not sure you didn`t get the wires crossed?Roman Catholic Church before the first century ? Exlpain.
@MarcillaSmith
@MarcillaSmith Жыл бұрын
@@misscameroon8062 When Christianity became the official state religion in the 4th century, there was already a Roman Catholic (universal) Church that administered the cult of the Emperor as well as the Capitoline Triad of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, and the rest of the ancient deities. The Temple of Jupiter came to be St. Peter's Basilica, and the pontifices of the old ways learned the new rites, and continued in their service to Rome and her God(s). There was no modern notion of separation of church and state. Julius Caesar was a pontiff before he was even consul, and even to this day, our Pope holds the title of Pontifex Maximus.
@bobbyallen7977
@bobbyallen7977 2 ай бұрын
I would suggest reading the book , " Pagan Christianity " by Frank Viola! He has done an in depth study of Roman Catholicism and its influence on the Protestants!
@Now_To_Infinity
@Now_To_Infinity Жыл бұрын
His nature is shown through his people that accept his spirit. Be ye Holy as your father in heaven is.
@calson814
@calson814 Жыл бұрын
Ignatius of Antioch mentioned the word "Catholic Church" in one of his letters.
@niccuellar1793
@niccuellar1793 Жыл бұрын
Yes, that is true, and great point. You can find that in his letter to the Symrnaeans, chapter VIII
@jamespitcher6936
@jamespitcher6936 Жыл бұрын
The word Catholic means universal. So the Catholic church in the first century means the universal church. Hence why in the Anglican version of the Apostles Creed, the word 'catholic' is used.
@joeswartz8286
@joeswartz8286 Жыл бұрын
@@jamespitcher6936 That is true. It can also be found in very fundamental Protestant Baptist Church’s statements of belief- “One Holy Catholic Church”. It merely means universal. The Universal Church is NOT the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church could be part of the Universal Church if they wanted to be…and they are very welcome!
@MegaTechno2000
@MegaTechno2000 Жыл бұрын
@@joeswartz8286 Lol... Protestants pop up 400 years ago.
@aleksandarstavric2226
@aleksandarstavric2226 Жыл бұрын
St Ignatius mentioned "Catholic Church" and he was thinking about Orthodox Church ..you guys in the west are not quite informed about the 2000 years old fact that orthodox church "official" name is One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church ...roman catholic church have tried to use the same title but it didn't worked ..also "catholic' doesn't mean "universal" that is primitive and poor latin translation ...catholic is a Greek word. Catholicity means fullness or perfection, wholeness ...there are many Patriarchates and all of them together are united ( in catholicity - Greek word) in to One Holly Catholic nd Apostolic Church also known as Orthodox Church A thousand years a go - Rome (as one of the patriarchates of the Orthodox church ) CAME OUT or split from the Orthodox Catholic Church and started to preach Roman Catholicism - a deviant and spiritually polluted version of Orthodox Catholicism
@marystempky380
@marystempky380 Жыл бұрын
It’s hard to by the claim that the Evangelists did not mean to provide a biographical account of Jesus’ life as they followed characteristics of biography of their time. So if their writings followed this model it would follow they meant the Gospels as biographies which were historical albeit from different perspectives meant for different audiences.
@haroldkmayes3591
@haroldkmayes3591 Жыл бұрын
God sacrificed himself to himself where is the sacrifice love fairy tells
@zedwart8534
@zedwart8534 Жыл бұрын
@@haroldkmayes3591 Not to mention that is stated in the Bible that no one can pay for the sins of others. Christianity is a bunch of nonsense created by Roman Empire.
@edwhite5535
@edwhite5535 Жыл бұрын
@@zedwart8534 You're not wrong. But you're also no entirely correct either. True Christianity is about understanding that the antagonist is the self proclaimed God of the Old Testament. This has been hidden by both the Catholic faith and the Jews. Yahweh is, quite literally, Satan. Any child can make this connection and see the glaringly obvious contradiction between Yahweh and Yeshua when reading the bible for themselves. One commits infanticide, the other states that hurting children is wrong... One reveals himself to Moses and speaks to him face to face, the other states very clearly that God has never been seen by any man. There is a reason why Jesus calls Satan "The Father of Lies", he's been lying to the Jews for thousands of years...
@achilles4242
@achilles4242 Жыл бұрын
@@haroldkmayes3591 Understanding sacrifice in the vein of gift with respect to the idea of covenant is the key to understanding Christian beliefs. I have no doubt you have no intention of properly doing so, but this was more for anyone that may read your comment.
@bettytigers
@bettytigers Жыл бұрын
​@@zedwart8534 God is Love, and with Love all things are possible! Trying to disprove this is like trying to prove you are not alive, Which I very much hope you don't! Facing the fire or the jump from the Twin Towers I'm pretty sure I would have jumped, but you don't know until you have to choose. I hope you choose life, by far the best option! 🙂
@jaredguillen13
@jaredguillen13 Ай бұрын
For anyone interesting in this topic : I highly recommend the book “The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name by Brian C. Muraresku”
@joannpowell471
@joannpowell471 8 ай бұрын
Peace be with you ALL!
@veerchasm1
@veerchasm1 Жыл бұрын
Jesus Rules
@chrislachat459
@chrislachat459 4 күн бұрын
Jesus Rules and Romans drool.
@jamesmacgillivray9607
@jamesmacgillivray9607 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't he born during the reign of Tiberius?
@TheStudent92
@TheStudent92 Жыл бұрын
Jesus died during the reign of Tiberius.
@johnpaul-mp7zc
@johnpaul-mp7zc 23 күн бұрын
At time 8:33 the author of this youtube states, " by the time of the 2nd century the church became a well- defined system with authorities such as bishops deacons and priest. Actually this came in during the time Acts was written. chapter 6 writes about how the church is growing and the need for assistance there is some other chapters as well
@crfogal67
@crfogal67 8 ай бұрын
Did Roman Catholics change the Christian Creed established by the early Church? If they changed the beliefs, how can it claim to be the original belief? What does the book of Galations say about this question? What does Orthodox mean? If you study what Orthodox Christianity is, then you will discover that this video reframes reality to suit different teachings.
@myjellybellylife9249
@myjellybellylife9249 Жыл бұрын
Constantine's involvement in the church changed the religion and put it on the map
@soldier8304
@soldier8304 Жыл бұрын
Wrong. Thanks for simplistic misunderstanding
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 9 ай бұрын
Correct 100% about King Constantine. He spun the papacy into power with his political court, even mandating Sunday observation by law. Politics shounever mix with the church. Look what a killing machine the papacy became, slaying "hetetics" for the Roman empire. Disgusting murderers of millions. The whore was drunken with the blood of the saints, indeed.
@cristianosiqueira1536
@cristianosiqueira1536 6 ай бұрын
No
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 6 ай бұрын
@@cristianosiqueira1536 Yes. Your simplistic "no" cannot change the history books. Why not stop protecting the devil and his evil popes? Their whole job is to kill Protestants and their infants, according to the jesuit extreme oath of induction. "In her ( the papacy) was found the blood of ALL slain upon the earth."That's why the papacy is gong into the lake of fire very soon. Her cup of iniquity is full. I can't wait to see Romanism fried to a crisp for all the murders it has done.
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 6 ай бұрын
Yes, in 313 the ruler Constantine claimed he had a dream that in the sign of 'IHS' ( really Isis, Horus, and Set), he would conquer. So he forced the Catholic church-state upon everyone, including Sunday enforcement laws with civil and criminal penalties for being caught working on his counterfeit Sunday-sabbath. The papacy thus began in tyranny, and aspires to rule the world once again with its Sun-day MARK OF THE BEAST. Coming soon :national Sunday laws per Poop Francisco's Laudato Si proclamation.
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Жыл бұрын
​ @catholic defence and truth seekers *You are D by R Church. 5 sources say Salvation Not By Works (Faith Alone) is a true doctrine. Scriptures, early church and Apostles/Jesus all affirmed it. Even Old R Church believed in that in early stages. R Church started to deny them centuries later and introduced its m m doctrines of Works Salvation.* *Where in the Bible teaches "faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved"?*
@joycegreer9391
@joycegreer9391 Жыл бұрын
Exactly right!
@quiricomazarin476
@quiricomazarin476 Жыл бұрын
Faith alone is not in the bible dufus. Only place in the bible they are together is " Faith Alone without WORKS is dead" Love how the bible destroys bible only protestantism.
@lucillejerome5511
@lucillejerome5511 Ай бұрын
what the heck is "you are D by R Church"?
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Ай бұрын
@@lucillejerome5511 *URD. Lol*
@Mettle_DAD
@Mettle_DAD 9 ай бұрын
5:29 A common apologist talking point is to ask why followers of Christ would claim to be so, or have witnessed the resurrection,falsely even if it meant persecution. Basically who would fake it to be in a club that was having its members persecuted. this line about Paul seeing Christianity as a liberation from strict Jewish rules would be very appealing to a lot of folks.
@dannyjackson5189
@dannyjackson5189 Ай бұрын
You're understanding is from the perspective of a 21st century westerner. There was not really much of a scientific methodology developed yet, women gave birth without anesthesia. Men fought in brutal war all over the planet with spears, swords, There was no economic development where the division of labor could shed most people from drudgery. There were no jobs involving pushing small buttons. People sacrificed their first born children burning them in fire 🔥. Daily existence anywhere didn't involve a call to Doordash. SO. Jews washing plates,separation of foods, some small sacrifice of flour, meal , a bovine, was worth being impaled and feed to a lion..Ok.if that maje sence to you .I didn't know why.
@Mettle_DAD
@Mettle_DAD Ай бұрын
@@dannyjackson5189 I'm not saying people would risk being thrown to the lions over hygiene rules. Were there not much more restrictive aspects of ancient Judaism? If I was a Jew could I marry a gentile woman?
@dannyjackson5189
@dannyjackson5189 28 күн бұрын
​@@Mettle_DAD Why would that matter why would you be hanging out with Gentile chicks anyways. Your mother and your father will get you a wife. And mostly the gentiles were enemies of the jewish people. It wasn't like Bridget loves Bernie. A fling with a sexy foreigner was probably not worth being flayed burned or pulled apart and changing your religion and losing your whole entire family.
@dannyjackson5189
@dannyjackson5189 28 күн бұрын
​@@Mettle_DAD Those people lived in a different paradigm. They didn't live in the middle of the sexual revolution where everything is desire and sex. poured on. As I said the notion of romantic love and marriage are just recent things.
@Mettle_DAD
@Mettle_DAD 28 күн бұрын
@@dannyjackson5189 institutionally the concept of "romantic love" is modern. But men and women through all time have sought out love not just utilitarian partnerships.yes back then women were considered property and essentially sold at a young age to a man willing to buy her. Which would probably be even more reason folks were looking for something different than that system. The old christian teachings aren't much of a step up. Everything is about man's subservience to God and women's subservience to men.....but it was a slightly better deal for women. They had relatively more freedom
@johngraham5948
@johngraham5948 Ай бұрын
The Catholic Church evolved over time I understand that it didn't start during his ministry crucifixion or after his Resurrection in a "chronological order" it evolved through the work of Christs followers of the day
@marcelsantos203
@marcelsantos203 Жыл бұрын
There are so many errors in this clip, did no one bother to do a bit of research?
@josueamaya5538
@josueamaya5538 Жыл бұрын
Thst's right.👍
@ottozambrana66
@ottozambrana66 Жыл бұрын
I'm with you!
@sonofman699
@sonofman699 Жыл бұрын
They just repeats the same non sense over and over.
@ottozambrana66
@ottozambrana66 Жыл бұрын
Roman Catholicism is one earthly/mundane organization inspired by Lucifer himself, an entity if you will, promoting an absolute mockery of what Christianity really is through very aggressive marketing/financial/influence/power goals. It's as cheap, religious and false as all others such as Judaism, Islam, Mormon, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Hinduism, Hare Krishna or Buddhism...just to mention a few. The saddest part is how most christians look at our movement and our Lord and Savior JesusChrist. Their idea, for the most part, is greatly erratic flirting with pure blasphemy.
@Stephen-jw8ci
@Stephen-jw8ci Жыл бұрын
yeah i wanted to support this channel but it’s just another one of those mass produced garbage channels, if you’re making informational videos you have an obligation to fact check
@itsglen9646
@itsglen9646 11 ай бұрын
I was hoping to hear the Coptic church mentioned, but am glad to learn that Christianity started as part of Judaism at the time.
@georgebentonjr3876
@georgebentonjr3876 9 ай бұрын
Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Romes Catholic Church. It is Christ Himself that builds His body the church.
@franaldo93
@franaldo93 2 ай бұрын
​@@georgebentonjr3876Catholic and Orthodox are the first Christians...
@hodgheg
@hodgheg 5 ай бұрын
What was gentile about the 70 or 72 'other' disciples of Jesus?
@bryanrichards3629
@bryanrichards3629 11 ай бұрын
Does the book contain ALL of the history?
@Callmethebreeze902
@Callmethebreeze902 3 ай бұрын
We have extra books in the Catholic Bible, like 6 or 7.
@TriciaPerry-mz7tc
@TriciaPerry-mz7tc 12 күн бұрын
AND STILL CLUELESS
@stefonny
@stefonny Жыл бұрын
Wow Jesus seemed to be a very cool guy
@mjramirez6008
@mjramirez6008 Жыл бұрын
He was everything good, cool included and to a divine extent
@oneill765
@oneill765 Жыл бұрын
Jesus was sound, he was a socialist.
@ka-peach7945
@ka-peach7945 Жыл бұрын
@@mjramirez6008 He was very likely totally made up and a fraud by zealots of the church.
@larrybedouin2921
@larrybedouin2921 Жыл бұрын
They went out from us, *but they were not of us* for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. {1 John 2:19} The church *that is at Babylon* elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son. {1 Peter 5:13}
@brendanquinn6894
@brendanquinn6894 Жыл бұрын
Spotonski !
@ndumferdy2545
@ndumferdy2545 Жыл бұрын
Correct quotation of 1 Peter 5:13 (NIV) : She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.
@larrybedouin2921
@larrybedouin2921 Жыл бұрын
@@ndumferdy2545 You're using a Non Inspired Version.
@patodwyer721
@patodwyer721 5 ай бұрын
Glory be to The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit Amen ✝️💕
@michaelkurasiewicz
@michaelkurasiewicz 9 ай бұрын
What year did the Roman Catholic start?
@Catholic101A.
@Catholic101A. 8 ай бұрын
33 A.D.
@Dystopian_NZ
@Dystopian_NZ Ай бұрын
More like between 306-337 AD as it was Constantine that 'created" the Catholic church. Jesus had nothing to do with it as did the 12 Disciples. This is a man made religion not of The Father.
@michaelkurasiewicz
@michaelkurasiewicz 22 күн бұрын
@@Dystopian_NZ I had told others this too, People have also been telling me, even in real life, “That all Bible translations are the same, Mike, etc!” I’m saying, “Read Revelations 22:18-19 kjv for what happens when you add or take away KJV verses!”, The NIV bible has removed even Matthew 17 about the demon possessed boy, and where it says “Philip baptized the Eunuch!” Basically, however the best, best way, to debunk all religions, and that they are not all the same, The history and the translation bible versions much like this, Do your research, and since Day 1 the Catholics never went by the 1611 King James Version Bible, since Day 1 the Muslims never went by the 1611 King James Version Bible, Since Day 1 the Jehova witnesses never went by the 1611 King James Version Bible, and like much Judiasm with their Torah bible translation, and Since Day 1, which is Jewish both men and women, the same lineage where Jesus is from, in Jerusalem they still reject Jesus as their Jewish messiah because their Torah bible translation said it was illegal to make any human beings idolized, idolatry is basically what Got Jesus hanging on a giant wooden cross, Judiasm even had to pay off Judas to betray Jesus or that translation bible mindset, Read Matthew 27:3 Kjv, John 19:1 kjv, Luke 23:33-34 kjv, John 3:16 Kjv, and the majority in Israel because that’s where Jesus is from, they still think like it was illegal for Jesus to claim he was God! Jesus never existed !! And then Read it again carefully, since Day 1 the Catholics went by the Douay rheims version, since day 1 the Muslims went by the Quran, Since Day one the Jehova witnesses went by the NWT, or the New World translation, see they aren’t all the same, and they have been since Day 1, along with the Catholics they had that Spanish Inquisition that did not last 3-5 years, it lasted 300 years! And it basically made every man, and woman convert into Catholicsm, and if people did not convert into becoming a catholic, they were tortured, worse than getting fired, and basically killed too! And Just like the Muslims Koran bible believers they had the 9-11 attacks twin towers, and the Boston bomber, the Muslim bible believers, they all were never the same, since Day 1. Or keep this simple, we would not even have Easter or Good Friday, since Day 1, the Torah bible mindset translation said it was illegal for Jesus to claim he was God!(again, The Torah is Judaism, or basically both Jewish men and women, and it’s what they believe in!! The Torah is basically the First five books of the Kjv one, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Duertonomy!!) just Get Jesus worse than getting fired! Crucify Jesus ! Blah blah blah! The Torah bible translation said it was illegal for Jesus to claim he was God!” (John 19:1 Kjv, Matthew 27:3 kjv, Luke 23:33-34 kjv) exactly !!) all the Bible translations are not the same, since Day 1, people need to get their facts straight. Revelations 22:18-19 KJV The way to debunk all Religions, go by Bible translations since Day one, the Muslims Islam went by the Koran, or Quran since Day 1, the Catholics invented 2 Douay rheims bibles before the 1611 Kjv Protestants bible too! It’s like NIV bible removed Kjv verses! Right, it’s definitely like this too, read Revelations 22:18-19 kjv, Exactly, Catholics, Muslims, Protestants, atheists, Jehovah witnesses even by go NWT version Bible! They aren’t all the same, since day 1, just by the Bible translation alone.. We should all be going by the 1611 Kjv Protestant’s bible and if it’s hard to understand the thee, thou, thy, we use the Strong’s exhaustive Concordance, because it goes hand in hand with it too!!
@michaelkurasiewicz
@michaelkurasiewicz 21 күн бұрын
@@Dystopian_NZ The best way to discern all the religions. Especially, The Catholics, and the 1611 KJV Protestants ! The Bible translations no duh ! Since Day 1, the Muslims went by the Koran just like since Day 1 the Catholics never agreed never went by the 1611 KJV Protestants bible translation! Revelations 22:18-19 KJV ! The Catholics published 2 bibles before the year 1611 too ! They were all never the same since Day 1! And no duh ! According to our KJV bible translation and faith, if both men,and women Catholics do not convert become John 3:3-7 KJV, and they died as a devote catholic ! Since people told me this along the way too, “I’m a devout Catholic and I’m going to die as one, Mike !! Blah blah blah!”, Again, They never aligned with our 1611 KJV bible translation! Because read Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 KJV, John 12:47-48 KJV, because it’s the word of God that will be judging everyone one of us anyways !! Hebrews 9:27 KJV, Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 KJV, John 10:26-27 KJV, John 12:47-48 KJV, They would be considered as unbelievers, they gotta become John 3:3-7 KJV born again like us KJV bible believers baptized acts 2:38 KJV, Ephesians 4:5 KJV, a new creature in Christ for sure too! 2nd Corinthians 5:17 KJV Like Martin Luther who started the Protestants but before it, he was Catholic for many years himself too! He started the Protestants Reformation! The Catholic Church deemed him an outlaw from it too! So it’s legit all God’s timing that both men and women Catholics become John 3:3-7 KJV born again too! As of for now, they would be considered as unbelievers !! Read it carefully again too, And unbelievers in our KJV faith, for sure do not align with the rapture, mentioned at 1st Thessalonians 4:16-17 KJV too, and unbelievers in our 1611 KJV bible translation get casted into Hell Luke 16:23 KJV, and the Lake of Fire, Revelations 20:10 KJV, revelations 21:8 KJV, And it’s legit worse than third degree burns all over the body in Hell and the Lake of fire, it’s all a place of torment, no purgatory, no second chances, your all never getting out, and no kidding !! And folks can’t argue Hell and the Lake of fire, because it was Designed by God mostly for Lucifer and his demons!! read Isaiah 14:12 KJV, Job 1:8 KJV, job 2:6 KJV, Matthew 10:7-8 KJV, Matthew 8:16 KJV, 1st Peter 5:7-8 KJV, Matthew 16:24 KJV, Because those KJV verses is about Satan or it mentioned the devil and his demons too! Because at the very beginning of it all, Satan or Lucifer rebelled God, with angels that he recruited! They all lost and got casted unto the earth, read Revelations 13:3-13 KJV, they are all on earth now, deceiving people because they know their time is running short, and this is by Sorcery, tarot cards Isaiah 8:19 KJV, vodoo dolls hebrews 10:26-27 KJV, ouji boards 1st Samuel 15:23 KJV, psychic readers revelations 20:10 KJV, shamanism revelations 21:8 kjv, we all see the signs and because people are not stupid too!! And even through doctrines of devils mentioned at 1st Timothy 4:1-3 KJV! Their goal now on earth is to convert people to become workers of iniquity in a way too! Matthew 7:23 KJV! Again at the very, very, very end of it They all get casted into Hell and the Lake of fire and no kidding !! It’s why we gotta try the spirits so much in a way too, mentioned at 1st John 4:1 KJV too, You have to also connect the Bible verses together, because it’s not just John 3:16 KJV everyday, and God’s words never changes each day too! The other way to discern it all, read 1st Thessalonians 4:16-17 kjv, that’s called “The Rapture”, That’s for sure not for the cult members of the Catholic religion, that’s not for the jehovva witnesses, it’s not for the cult members of the Muslims! It’s why I had asked mark and Myles if I’m saying it correctly listing them, both Myles and mark have jobs and cars too! They just like to fellowship as legit John 3:3-7 kjv born again Believers together so much too! They are independent individuals!! They aren’t stupid too ! And mark is a military veteran too!! It’s not for the Catholics in simple words !! Again all of these devote men and women know exactly who they are too! Even in secrecy!! They would all be considered as unbelievers ! And for Those who do not make the rapture, again they would all be considered as unbelievers ! The rapture is only for legit John 3:3-7 kjv born again believers ! And read it again! Unbelievers get casted into Hell Luke 16:23 kjv and the Lake of fire! Revelations 20:10 kjv, revelations 21:8 kjv, And both Hell and the Lake of fire is a Place of torment !! And it’s legit worse than third degree burns all over the body, no purgatory, no second chances! No probation no parole, And you’re all never getting out! And no kidding!
@ridealongwithnicolle1581
@ridealongwithnicolle1581 Жыл бұрын
This was so interesting. I learned something new 😌
@pistoffpussycat5778
@pistoffpussycat5778 Жыл бұрын
Well unlearn it. It's not accurate.
@KaylaSwan640
@KaylaSwan640 Жыл бұрын
@@pistoffpussycat5778 thank you. Not correct at all
@YodaTrades1
@YodaTrades1 9 ай бұрын
don't listen to the negative comments to your post.... haters are everywhere now a days.
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Жыл бұрын
​ @catholic defence and truth seekers *You keep L. 1. Exact Word Criterion is Not a proof for doctrines. The word trinity is not in the Bible but the doctrine is. Similarly Faith Alone which means Salvation Not By Works. 2. Old Catholic Bibles do show Sola Fede/Faith Alone. You were refuted right from beginning yet you kept L for 5 days.* “ Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" Swan, James. "Luther Added The Word "Alone" to Romans 3:28?". February 05, 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2014. Hodge, Charles, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (New Edition), 1864, p100 Even some Catholic versions of the New Testament also translated Romans 3:28 as did Luther. The Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and of Venice (1538) say “per sola fede.” Others previous to Luther may have differed in theological interpretation, yet saw the thrust of the words implied “alone.” The Romanists, indeed, made a great outcry against that version as a gross perversion of Scripture, although Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" so that Erasmus, De Ratione Concionandi, Lib. III., says, "Vox sola, tot clamoribus lapidata hoc saeculo in Luthero, reverenter in Patribus auditur." See Koppe and Tholuck on this verse. you said almost 5 days now and not one single verse on faith alone
@gregorchard7881
@gregorchard7881 Жыл бұрын
The Encyclopedia of Religion admits: “Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.” And the New Catholic Encyclopedia also says: “The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the O[ld] T[estament].”
@wani4774
@wani4774 7 ай бұрын
this is so good
@vinjavarapu
@vinjavarapu 6 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@kalaitindubokenneth1739
@kalaitindubokenneth1739 Жыл бұрын
Nice write-up. 😊👍
@byronhixson6860
@byronhixson6860 Жыл бұрын
They had quite the time to mix it up! There is but one Father! I could go on....
@ka-peach7945
@ka-peach7945 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sparing us from your delusions..
@mohamedbaridhwan3017
@mohamedbaridhwan3017 5 ай бұрын
The holy spirit always seems to get the short end of the stick in the trinity. Is he a subordinate in this union?
@thomaswayneward
@thomaswayneward 5 ай бұрын
No, he is one third of it, but they are all one God.
@wani4774
@wani4774 7 ай бұрын
im able to build and guide my own beliefs based on this history
@johnboy8696
@johnboy8696 Жыл бұрын
Interesting in a video about the beginnings of Christianity you use the phrase 'BCE'. So, what happened to change it to today's era? When did BCE stop being BCE and become something else? And what happened to cause this change?
@monicamurray5012
@monicamurray5012 Жыл бұрын
Instead of BC (before Christ) they use BCE (which stands for before common error). The so called government does not want God in the picture. In other words, they are taking our religious freedom away.
@charlesdayon8420
@charlesdayon8420 Жыл бұрын
I believe that it was changed so as not to offend the Jewish people.
@joycegreer9391
@joycegreer9391 Жыл бұрын
@@charlesdayon8420 I think more like offending atheists.
@davidstarr6604
@davidstarr6604 Жыл бұрын
Why does it say "3 replies" yet shows only 1? Anyway the calendar was changed into our current Gregorian calendar and is actually off by 4 years. Jesus was born in 4 BC. "BC" technically means "before Christ" and (I think) AD means "after death", not sure though cause that don't make sense either. Can anyone confirm what "AD" translates to? Evolutionists like the BCE and CE dates. "Before Common Era" and "Common Era". It leaves Christ out of the calculations of years and away from our calendars.
@joycegreer9391
@joycegreer9391 Жыл бұрын
@@davidstarr6604 AD=Anno Domini. Medieval Latin and means 'in the year of the Lord'. I find often that all the comments don't show. Don't know what's up with that.
@michaelodonnell824
@michaelodonnell824 Жыл бұрын
Paul wrote his (verified) letters many years before the first of the Gospels - so to say he "Stripped the Gospels of their Jewish roots" is anachronistic. ALSO, Paul was and remained, till his death, a Jew and, at least some scholars, use that as a lens to explore his writings.
@frankfowlkes7872
@frankfowlkes7872 Жыл бұрын
Good point
@geordiewishart1683
@geordiewishart1683 Жыл бұрын
What do you mean by Jew? Paul was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.
@Great1Duane
@Great1Duane Жыл бұрын
@@geordiewishart1683 “ “I am a Jew, born at Tarsus in Cili′cia”. Acts 22:3
@charlesdayon8420
@charlesdayon8420 Жыл бұрын
If Paul was always a Jew, then Catholic's who leave the Catholic church are always Catholic's. Which is true anyway because the Catholic Baptism leaves a indelible mark, which cannot be changed or erased. So if the Catholic leaves the Catholic church his Baptism remains intact. He does not lose his Catholic Baptism if Rebaptised he still retains his original Baptism. So Catholic's who leave the Catholic church will be purged of their dislike and disbelief, and some may be in Purgatory until the End of Time.
@annemariekoutsky5054
@annemariekoutsky5054 Жыл бұрын
Paul may have functioned like St John the Baptist getting the gentiles prepared to know Jesus and repent. He claims only to have baptized Onesemose ( who later became a bishop). He admonishes about not receiving the Body and Blood of Jesus without acknowledging the fact, but he may not have been part of the priesthood to change the bread and wine into Christ's True Presence.
@ronishwartz
@ronishwartz 2 ай бұрын
One important note : The name of the holy land during Jesus's time was not "Palestine" : The name "Palestine" was given to the holy land by Roman emperor Hadrian, only around 130 ad (more than a century after the crucifixion) .
@twofourseven365phoreber
@twofourseven365phoreber 18 күн бұрын
yk when Messi scored a goal he used to do a style first he touch his forehead and left shoulder and then right shoulder...i was kinda confused at first
@TM-yn4iu
@TM-yn4iu Жыл бұрын
The voice narrating this video is clear, interesting how The voice narrating this video is clear, interesting how he stepped away from his origin - as videos go. I found his videos quite informative then and this is a sound theoretical theory. But as always, it's a theory - well presented. Catholiscm, as with all religion is revised by individuals with personal motive.wish all well, walk as Jesus did without judgment or motive....example.
@DMNingasca
@DMNingasca Жыл бұрын
That's also what I observed while was watching the video
@mikebrown9850
@mikebrown9850 Жыл бұрын
Satan comes as an Angel of Light. 2 Corinthians 11:14-15 Satan also LOVES theories!!!
@MrGumball_
@MrGumball_ 6 ай бұрын
Need a little guidance here, if early christians (not even called christians), were just another Jewish sect, so what about trinity..? When did this concept come to existence? Who initiated it?
@krisgangwer3796
@krisgangwer3796 3 ай бұрын
God. Father, Son, Holy Spirit. This is the concept of the trinity but the Godhead. You asked who initiated it. It was not man, and I am not sure that "initiated" is a good term for it.
@MrGumball_
@MrGumball_ 3 ай бұрын
@@krisgangwer3796 So you mean it's divine, no need explanation. If so, that's a belief, I can't deny. But the question is not answered, yet.
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U
@iNdUsTrIaLrOcKeR4U Жыл бұрын
Mother was the First Christian followed by Saint Joseph.
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Жыл бұрын
​ @Maria Martins *So you wrote your own Bible? ​ Wow how wonderful. Which verse says "if you don't eat the body and drink the blood of the son of man you will not enter the kingdom of heaven"?* you said esus says if you don't eat the body and drink the blood of the son of man you will not enter the kingdom of heaven,
@FreeinChristForever
@FreeinChristForever Жыл бұрын
Actually it says, “Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.” ‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭53‬ ‭ It goes on to say, “And Jesus went up into a mountain, and there he sat with his disciples. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.” ‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭3‬, ‭54‬-‭58‬ ‭ But if you are not saved, (repented of your sins, baptized in The Name of Jesus Christ/Yehoshua HaMeshiach and received the Holy Ghost-Acts 2:38) and after that don’t know what this means I’d advise you to not take communion because you don’t even know what Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ)is saying or what this means and you can’t unless you are saved. The catholics however are not taking communion because for one thing they aren’t saved, for another they been stopped serving Yehoshua HaMeshiach over 1900 years ago when they left the apostles and Christians under the instigation of ignatius in 99 AD because he and they wanted to be the ones the people of Yehoshua HaMeshiach went to instead of GOD Being Who they go to for help. They said they would go to GOD for them when Yehoshua HaMeshiach clearly wanted a personal relationship with each every one of us. They incorporated pagan ideologies and practices to get more members and everything and that is why they are a Catholic Church, catholic means universal and church is another name for circ/kirk a goddess of sorcery. The only reason church is found in the Bible is because of their pervasive influence during history when this word is not found in the original Hebrew nor in the Greek translations. Repent and be baptized in the Name of Yehoshua HaMeshiach for the remission or washing away of your sins and you shall receive The Holy Ghost (Acts 2:38. How will you know that you have the Holy Ghost? “And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. For they heard them speak with tongues…” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭10‬:‭45‬-‭46 This is salvation, this is how you know that you are saved.
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Жыл бұрын
​@@FreeinChristForever *I see .. you are just misquoting Scriptures to fit your agenda. 1 Cor 10:3-4 clearly says communion is spiritual. Not eating Jesus physically. How do you explain that?* you said Actually it says, “Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.” ‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭53‬ ‭
@faithalone2171
@faithalone2171 Жыл бұрын
​@@FreeinChristForever *So you are a Onenessctmember. Bible teaches "baptised in the name of Trinity and baptised in the name of Jesus". Both. You are wrong once again.* Mat 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Mat 28:20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen. you said Repent and be baptized in the Name of Yehoshua HaMeshiach for the remission or washing away of your sins and you shall receive The Holy Ghost (Acts 2:38.
@FreeinChristForever
@FreeinChristForever Жыл бұрын
​@@faithalone2171 didn’t you notice that name was singular here and not plural? And since when is father, son or let’s say soul(Holy Ghost is the essence of YHWH like a soul is the essence of a person) a name? Do you think Yehoshua HaMeshiach would pick disciples and Paul who would blatantly disobey Him and every time they baptized they did it in total disregard for His Words? EVERY time they baptised in the Bible, not even ONCE did they baptize in “father, son, or Holy Ghost,” not even ONCE. Why? Because these are not names. There are many fathers out there, many sons, and many have souls or ghosts but none of these are their names. “Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭2‬:‭37‬-‭38 “Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the Name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭10‬:‭47‬-‭48‬ ‭ “When they heard this, they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭19‬:‭5‬ ‭ As for the Father and the son, “Philip saith unto Him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?” ‭‭John‬ ‭14‬:‭8‬-‭9‬ ‭ And The Holy Ghost, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost….” ‭‭John‬ ‭14‬:‭26 “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.” ‭‭John‬ ‭14‬:‭18‬ ‭
@FreeinChristForever
@FreeinChristForever Жыл бұрын
​@@faithalone2171 I could explain it all day but unless you have repented and been baptized in the Name of Yehoshua HaMeshiach for the remission or washing away or removal of your sins and have received The Holy Ghost. You won’t understand it.
@el-sig2249
@el-sig2249 Жыл бұрын
Christianity did not suddenly explode? Think again: Over 3000 were added to their numbers in one day. That sounds pretty explosive to me. The stylistic study of the epistles, an exact science, proves that all letters attributed to him are by him.
@curtiscote
@curtiscote Жыл бұрын
Christianity spread like wild fire. Because of the many whitnesses who heard Christ's teaching and saw his miracles. Many were being tortured, crucified, persecuted fed to lions. There's sources even outside scripture of the followers of christ being many and growing the Roman's were taking it as a threat and tried to extinguish them. But the more they tried the more converts would arise. There's mention of the followers of christ written from the jews, historians, roman soldiers. It took 300 years for the Roman's to make Christianity legal and the Roman's were being converted .. so yes it was an explosion. It was a movement, a fire that couldn't be put out. So what would you call that?
@VampireHub616
@VampireHub616 Жыл бұрын
@@curtiscote 400 years
@curtiscote
@curtiscote Жыл бұрын
@@VampireHub616 400 years what. Are you referring to my comment of 300 yrs till rome accepted christ? Because if christ was crucified between 30-33 ad it would make 300 yrs exact to constantine The Fifty Bibles of Constantine were Bibles in the original Greek language commissioned in 331 by Constantine I and prepared by Eusebius of Caesarea.!
@regiis.ripae.terrae
@regiis.ripae.terrae Жыл бұрын
The SILLY SH^T HUMANS BELEAVE is unreal!!!! TT4N Slaves...
@garystanfield2274
@garystanfield2274 Жыл бұрын
Christianity is pagan tp the core, when Constantine made Christianity the State religion of the Roman Empire is when it exploded because no other religion was allowed.
@Yourefreekinbrilliant
@Yourefreekinbrilliant 9 ай бұрын
A more pertinent question would be when will it end?
@GuitarBloodlines
@GuitarBloodlines 9 ай бұрын
never
@Yourefreekinbrilliant
@Yourefreekinbrilliant 9 ай бұрын
@@GuitarBloodlines all things must pass
@GuitarBloodlines
@GuitarBloodlines 9 ай бұрын
@@Yourefreekinbrilliant the Catholic Church will exist until the end of the universe and the second coming of Christ
@Yourefreekinbrilliant
@Yourefreekinbrilliant 9 ай бұрын
@@GuitarBloodlines ok 👍
@bethanyrose2023
@bethanyrose2023 9 ай бұрын
The Church on earth will end on judgment day when Jesus with the angels will harvest the wheat from the weed. The righteous will go to heaven and the wicked (wheat) will be thrown in the fires of hell.
@liamkerrigan5665
@liamkerrigan5665 9 ай бұрын
Wow. Some vid. 👍 a lot of work went into that.
@capevancouver1157
@capevancouver1157 Жыл бұрын
The Mitre hat and robe represent Dagon , which fell before the Ark of Moses as if praying to it . Jonah brought the word to the after being in the belly of the fish . Constantine's army, power base were mostly Christian after recruiting an army crossing western Europe . You worshiped the Constantine ( Mystery influence)way or were made into a martyr. My ancestors were Huguenots. The first European settlers murdered in mass on the American continent were at Huguenot Beach because they were protestant.
@TIJoe-te9qu
@TIJoe-te9qu 10 ай бұрын
Ah, Dagon, the mighty fish God, brought into Catholicism and applied to the popes. How do papists not see through this hooey? Hiw do they turn a blind eye to the inquisitions and crusades? The papacy is a killing machine like no other.
@ronaldbaum9576
@ronaldbaum9576 Жыл бұрын
Check your history Luke was a doctor Matthew was a tax collector for the Roman's and judas was the groups treasurer for the group so it seems to me there were more than just common men
@dcasper8514
@dcasper8514 Жыл бұрын
You are so right, Ronald.
@user-uq2rr4xt9g
@user-uq2rr4xt9g Ай бұрын
You have the wrong St. Ignatus in the video . When talking about St. Ignatius of Antioch, you show a picture of St. Ignatius of Lyola.
@user-rg5vt9wi8q
@user-rg5vt9wi8q Ай бұрын
I didn't know they had cameras back then. Thanks for the info. smh
@GizmoFromPizmo
@GizmoFromPizmo 5 ай бұрын
When did the office of a Christian priest begin? We can see the office of bishop in the New Testament but nowhere in that document do we have any record of an office of "priest". In fact, "priest", in the New Testament, refers to all the saints and not a special holy class of people.
@mweskamppp
@mweskamppp Жыл бұрын
The word catholic was used in different context. The words meaning is "universal". In the first centuries there were lots of different churches, more than today. Gnostic, anti-trinitarians and more. With the first conciles the bishops of different sects agreed on common grounds, some directions were considered heretic and non christian. The syrian anti-trinitarian church kept separated and to my knowledge influenced Mohammed in writing the Quran. The dividing of the roman empire later led to a dividing into two churches, although the differences were small. Some centuries later some people were unhappy with the church and started to create a plethora of own spin off churches.
@dimplax5973
@dimplax5973 Жыл бұрын
Mohammed pbuh couldn't read or write. He couldn't write the Quran, even if he wanted to.
@mweskamppp
@mweskamppp Жыл бұрын
@@dimplax5973 True, he dictated to people with good memory. So they say. Lots of texts were put together some decades later by a ruler who got the original witnesses to confirm the correctness they say. There was also lots of transcription mistakes later, when the high arabic writing was invented and the ones who wrote the quran in it, did not properly understand the mix of arabic and aramaic of the early texts, some philologist say. Much of the quran is summaries of synopses of biblic texts or just quotes from the bible.
@tessangelabeck8958
@tessangelabeck8958 Жыл бұрын
The most laughable explanation I’ve been told, by an evangelical minister, about the Bible being translated over 400 times since creation of the printing press, is that “we need to trust the Holy Spirit was with the scribes.” We all know the telephone game, how one spoken brief message is whispered to another who is playing, and then that person whispers the simple statement to the next person to pass along . . the end resulting message tends to be very different from the initial message. Soooo . . when I don’t understand metaphor in Gospel scripture’s quotes attributed to Jesus, I don’t allow myself to become twisted over it.
@timothyreilly8394
@timothyreilly8394 Жыл бұрын
The First Century the was only one Christian Church, different locations. Gnostic is not s church, but a philosophy. Principle influence of the Qoran was Old Testament which Muhammad qplagiarized & corrupted. There is no Syrian Anti-Trinitarian church that I'm aware of.
@xhorxheetxeberria-td1hu
@xhorxheetxeberria-td1hu Жыл бұрын
Really bad information. I suggest you read facts before writing flawed comments.
@jediv3381
@jediv3381 Жыл бұрын
​ @Andrew Patton *R Catholics love tales. Nowhere in the Bible says R Church = Christ's CHurch or the Universal Church or the bride of Christ. Neither does Bible mention the office of bishop of bishops - pope.* you said 1 Corinthians 1 C dividing the Church as D - M the Body of Christ. Whoever separates himself from the Pope and the Church separates himself from Christ. Christ is not a polygamist; He has no bride except the Catholic Church.
@sammygomes7381
@sammygomes7381 Жыл бұрын
Sorry but the bride of Christ is the born-again believers that follow the teaching of Christ, the word of God, not a manmade dogma.
@quiricomazarin476
@quiricomazarin476 Жыл бұрын
Clement & Linus 2 popes are in the bibke dufus je div.
@cdmcintyre1854
@cdmcintyre1854 8 ай бұрын
Please Answer this if you can! The ONLY thing that concerns me about Catholic Doctrine is this one thing and I have NEVER received an answer that can be supported by Bible Scripture. Where is one verse that says God changed his mind about the Seventh Day Sabbath, (God even says He is the same today, yesterday and forever.) God gave us 10 Commandments from Moses in the Old Testament and never have I ever seen a single scripture verse that confirms a change of the Sabbath from the Seventh Day to the First Day. That’s why I refer to Sunday as the Catholic sabbath (with a small case S)!
@georgepierson4920
@georgepierson4920 8 ай бұрын
On what day did Jesus rise from the dead?
@cdmcintyre1854
@cdmcintyre1854 8 ай бұрын
@@georgepierson4920 Sunday.
@georgepierson4920
@georgepierson4920 8 ай бұрын
@@cdmcintyre1854 Therefore, since Jesus rose from the dead on Sunday, and not between the hours of sundown Friday to Sundown Saturday, Christians everywhere gather to worship God on the day that Jesus rose from the dead.
@cdmcintyre1854
@cdmcintyre1854 8 ай бұрын
@@georgepierson4920 it’s true about Jesus resurrecting on Sunday, but the problem is this: no where in the scripture does God change the Sabbath to Sunday. Man doing something because it seems like a good idea is not the same as God choosing a Sabbath. God picked the seventh day to honor His creation, if God wanted to pick Sunday to honor His Resurrection then I’m 100% sure God would not have left it up to guess work by men! He would have told us without any room for doubt. God NEVER changed His Sabbath the Catholic Church did and they will proudly tell you that they did.
@brianmarshall1637
@brianmarshall1637 Жыл бұрын
When did the Catholic interpretation of the last supper as the ritual of the mass begin?
@ripcord8738
@ripcord8738 Жыл бұрын
The painting originated between 1495-98 C.E. It was done by Leonardo Da Vinci.
@lucillejerome5511
@lucillejerome5511 Ай бұрын
You didn't answer his question! @@ripcord8738
@FernandoGomez-hg4rn
@FernandoGomez-hg4rn Жыл бұрын
The Catholics attribute Jesus saying something like "upon this rock I'll build my church". Church in old Greek is ekklesía, which means assembly. Catholics argue that Jesus meant assembly as an institution, i.e. a permanent assembly. And also claim that Jesus mean Peter, the first Pope, to be the "rock", as Peter comes from the old Greek Petros meaning "rock". This is why they claim Catholicism was established by Jesus himself.
@dvdortiz9031
@dvdortiz9031 Жыл бұрын
What would anyone gain by arguing with your corked???
@nolacombs2181
@nolacombs2181 11 ай бұрын
Don't even get me started on Peter Pan.
@robertstano6036
@robertstano6036 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't John the Baptist the first to baptize and not Antioch
@morlan2668
@morlan2668 Жыл бұрын
Antioch is a place not a person
@anthonyvink7153
@anthonyvink7153 Жыл бұрын
Baptist was something done in Israel
@fareast8739
@fareast8739 Жыл бұрын
baptizing in the Name of Almighty Fahter name of Son and the Holy spirit of the Covenant not baptizing in christian
@IRMOKE
@IRMOKE 4 ай бұрын
This is a good video but the glaring error. Is the lack of mention of the Eastern Orthodox Church
@bruno_ffs
@bruno_ffs Жыл бұрын
How do you know the gospels were written 70 years later? I thought the earliest copies were the 2 AD Greek ones - that’s 200 years after events took place
@robs.2671
@robs.2671 Жыл бұрын
Those would be the earliest surviving copies, the original gospels are unaccounted for
@wvmountaingirl1976
@wvmountaingirl1976 Жыл бұрын
The book of Luke is written using only eye witness testimony. I find that just amazing. Thank God for the cross, the blood & Jesus Christ. Without Him all is lost.
@AX_001
@AX_001 8 ай бұрын
😂 Anyone could write that. The entire book sounds fictional
@secondadventmessengerminis3594
@secondadventmessengerminis3594 Ай бұрын
Five eyewitnesses is not true.
Why did the Protestant Reformation Happen?
11:59
Knowledgia
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Great Schism (1054)
31:02
Ryan Reeves
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Barriga de grávida aconchegante? 🤔💡
00:10
Polar em português
Рет қаралды 35 МЛН
Did Jesus Found the Catholic Church?
13:23
Breaking In The Habit
Рет қаралды 483 М.
What Caused the Roman Empire to Collapse
17:41
The Infographics Show
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
Why did the Great Schism Happen?
12:19
Knowledgia
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
The Book of Enoch Explained
15:00
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН
All Christian denominations explained in 12 minutes
12:10
Redeemed Zoomer
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Vatican City Explained
6:39
CGP Grey
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Muslim Schism: How Islam Split into the Sunni and Shia Branches
19:01
Kings and Generals
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Ex-Catholic Exposes the TWISTED Teachings of the Catholic Church | Mike Gendron
1:04:45
Earliest Depictions of Jesus in Art
16:35
UsefulCharts
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
Why Did Pontius Pilate Have Jesus Executed? | The Man Who Killed Christ | Timeline
49:10
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН