Even if Sharks were completely extinct, some fish species will gradually carbon copy the same body plan to fill that niche. Assuming a supernova or other planet ending phenomenon doesn't intervene.

Sharks have changed and diversified morphologically by a huge amount.

A very adaptable torpedo with teeth

Was about to say, the design is foolproof

👎👎🏼👎🏼👎🏾👎🏻👎🏻👎🏽👎🏽👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏻👎👎🏼👎🏼👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏽👎🏿👎🏿👎🏿👎🏽👎🏻👎🏾👎🏼👎🏼👎👎👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼

And all of those will somehow eventually evolve into crabs

Also turtles and lizards

And Tardigrades.

@@TheFlyingSailorYT if moss die out they're doomed

@@BlackpilledSaihara moss is probably the most adaptable plants soo doubt they will every go extinct

And that crocs are unbelievably lazy , I had a large alligator in a ditch in my backyard that did not eat anything significant or move much for a year and a half because of a harsh winter that screwed up his mating season migration before finally leaving without much apparent weight loss. Crocodilians can just shut off during rough times in a way that puts bears hibernate to shame

@@voiceofreason2674 yes, they slow down their metabolism. The cold aids in slowing down their metabolism as well. Crocodilians have a metabolism that basically runs off the temperature around them, the complete opposite of us mammals. If it’s hot out, crocodilians would have to eat a lot more, whereas in the cold their metabolism the metabolism itself can’t digest food fast. Us mammals have constant metabolisms based off our body temperatures, that’s why most people have the same metabolism.

Sharks can just eat each other and boom, easy

@@bunathan2485 Need more food? Give birth.

@@bunathan2485 yes, sharks are known cannibals as well. A lot of animals that have been alive for very long time just seem to be animals that are omnivores and scavengers. They have learned to eat anything while others learned to eat very specific things, like koalas and mantis shrimp. Those animals can very easily be wiped out with just a loss to their food source. This can happen to humans as well though, we have a wide variety of foods but we have not adapted to being able to eat anything and everything. Eating different kinds of lettuces and tomatoes and different species of cows and chickens doesn’t mean we can eat anything, it means we’ve created a variety.

Sharoku

Sharks are anime protagonists

@@vincentfox4929 They're perfect fodder for any Manga or Anime character. Hero, Villain, or Companion.

the only answer

Talk-no-jutsu'd it's way around the bullshit lol

Agree. It'd be awesome to see a Paleo sound composer make accurate noises of some prehistoric animals depicted to look even more lively.

Even paleo art proven to be anatomically incorrect, and speculative art have incredible merit. Art in all its forms is one of the most important parts of our civilization.

It's actually really sad that cartilage doesn't fossilize well. Although I respect paleoartist, and love their work, i find it sad that 99% of all reconstructions of sharks are the same fisk with different jaws. That is the grate white form. If we can learn anything about sharks knowing current species, it is that sharks are really diverse and magnificent.

There are several accounts on Instagram which showcase paleo-artist works.

The only one who is somewhat famous is James Gurney. His work, such as Dinotopia, are just as genius as any other art.

Even megalodon lasted over 15 million years (and even managed to outlast competition from the raptorial sperm whales or other raptorial odontocetes). Most apex predators are lucky to last 5 million years.

Except macropredatory condrichtians did get slapped pretty hard in all major extinctions. Eugeonotids became nearly extinct in the P-Tr extinction and Lamnids never recovered from the K-Pg extinction.

@@miquelescribanoivars5049 Lamnids became more successful post-KT than before.

@@bkjeong4302 Larger =/= More sucessfull. They were 60 to 90 genera of Lamniformes in the Late Cretaceous, they never reached that diversity in the Cenozoic and it has kept decreasing until this day. This research is referenced in the video.

@@miquelescribanoivars5049 I’m not talking about size. In terms of eco-morphological diversity lamniforms did (and still do) better in the Cenozoic than the Cretaceous. You’re also ignoring that those 60 to 90 genera didn’t all live at the same time.

.....shark skin isn't smooth xD

@@AmandaComeauCreates That's the point xD

Big if true

@@AmandaComeauCreates sharks are smooth like silk

sharks are incredibly smooth in all directions

Reject man, embrace shark

Yes

Reject shark become jellyfish

@@rolloxra670 Rolf from Ed Edd n Eddy: Quake and quiver like a jellyfish, Doggy Doo-Doo Ed-boy! For in the name of the great Shepherd Elders, Rolf will grill your strudel until you cry like a teensy weency baby!

a

4 times that

I know... they're planing something, I just know it.

The fact that their fossil records are older than the oldest fossils of trees is even more wild, what the actual fuck??!

@@brandenapexo604 It's so easy to think of trees as being a constant. But... nope.

@@brandenapexo604 Yeah, I thought I knew things, but I didn't figure they were older than trees.

We?

Maybe the real extinction was the shark maths we did along the way

This is a very good comment

Maybe the real mass was the shark extinctions along the way we made.

Based

Lil' smily survivor bois

@@alvaronavarro4895 *Giant immortal sociopathic bois

@@coltonbates629 indeed

Ever notice that sharks and dogs have the same dopey smiles? It's like if one went by you you'd hear faint elevator music as it passed. No thoughts whatsoever.

Smiley water puppies

turtles being immune to jellyfish stingers has proven to be a very advantageous adaption. jellyfish are some of the oldest marine species to exist and they are still thriving - its an abundant food source that doesnt seem to be dwindling. As long as turtles can survive their vulnerable early life they should be fine..... assuming acidic oceans don't destroy their shells. If anyone has data on past high CO2 levels and its impact on turtles I'd love to read a paper!

@@victorerickson9770 there's also the grave problem of dumping trash in the ocean Jellyfish look a lot like plastic bags

i think your right ! great idea !!! also maybe amphibians week ? with frogs and salamanders and such ?

Turtle week maybe slow to catch…

We also need a worm week, as they continue to feed us

killing is bad ! even killing time is bad, its a waste of time ! if your love life sucks, by a flashlight vagina. if you like to play games but are not good in them dont worry you should play games just for fun anyway, i hope you find something in life you like and enjoy it, joy can come in small packages, please contact me if you like know there are good people out there who WILL be there for you! i promise if you just open up your self to the world. maybe not all the way open because then pleople can get to you but just enough so people can get to know you, i guess thats the most important thing in life is being happy. i wish you the best of luck mr M.

@Y tho killing and eating a wild animal

@Y tho please check; youtube video ,Ronald Reagan its a simple answer after all ( 2/3 min video ) starts with iran and has some very good speech ! one of the best in the world about war, please let me know what you thought about it ;-)

Where is Albert Einstein hiding in 2021

"Bigger jaws"

I've been up close to a tiger shark. His fin breached right beside me and I couldn't tell you anything else because I was paddling for my life haha

“HE WAS IN A MOVIE YOU SHOULD WATCH IT ITS CALLED JAWS!!!”

Ah neil ciciarega, a true philosopher

@@bennyworm4384 y e s

HEE HOO SHARK GO BLUB BLUB

You idiot....try asian shark fin soup for a cause...OMG

@@chopperking007 while shark fin soup is an incredibly cruel practice, it is not the main reason for the decline of Sharks. Like most fish depopulation it has to do with large scale industrial fishing practices more than any specific practice

@@stochasticbraindroppings3484 bullshit...they kill 73 million sharks a year for soup id say it's the single biggest cause of their decline.

tldw not tdlw it stands for too long didn’t watch not too didn’t long watch

@@peabrain6872 "too didn't long watch" sounds right to me

@@GREYFLWRMUSIC yeah sounds about right

@@Jake-zk3eb yeah sounds right

@@Atomic_bombs affirmative, sounds right to me

Lavasioth: "Am I a joke to you"

There is a shark that live in lava and a crab i forget were i saw it probalay in youtube

@@TatoGato yes. Yes you are

Given their track record so far, my money's on the sharks.

I also promote his mom's channel

No 420 is not nice Only 69 is and 69420 are nice

@@rexyjp1237 but 420 is big funny

neither of those numbers are funny unless you are under the age of 13

@@peabrain6872 I came here for 2 things ●Paleontology ●and funny numbers

@@paincow3236 same here

agreed

Man porbeagle sharks are almost gone

When it’s all said & done, we may be the worst extinction event the earth has ever seen. Let’s hope we’re not🤞

Yes, the 'evolutionary algorithm' got a bit warped when the hominidae were evolving, leading to the 'evolutionary aberration' that was the genus - Homo... Gaia somewhat shot herself in the foot with that particular software...

Shark soup

@@goldenageofdinosaurs7192 You're pretty delusional

@@c_f0rce between industrial waste being dumped in copious amounts, to humans leveling entire ecosystems, we are truly earths destroyer. We suck.

I thought Tigers or Cheetahs filled that niche.

@@jacobhoover1654 Those are not cartilagenous fish

@@aerolink2515 so?

@@jacobhoover1654 so not land shark

@@aerolink2515 but they fill the same niche

Shark week

@@leaflotus6726 shark week

@@leaflotus6726 shark week

@@leaflotus6726 sheek

Yes

It’s also quite ironic that people still use the “Livyatan put megAlOdOn iN extinction” or orcas or great white sharks, Yet Megalodon died due to global warming of its prey moving.

@@AlotOfKarma *global cooling (also, it was less that whale moved to colder waters than whale diversity plummeted-we went from a wide diversity of smaller, more numerous baleen whales to a few species of larger but less common baleen whales)

@@bkjeong4302 opps, sorry about my little spelling error that’s fucking embarrassing.

Futile trying to merge cladistic and Linnean classification - Linnean ranks are falling out of favour (at least among professionals). Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes are universally considered monophyletic clades under all current schemes.

A classification of six living classes of vertebrates called fish seems to make more sense, with lampreys being more closely related to jawed vertebrates than to hagfish, Elasmobranchs being more closely related to bony vertebrates than to holocephalans, and lobe-finned fish being more closely related to tetrapods than to ray-finned fish, therefore this redivides fish into the classes: Myxini (Hagfish), Petromyzontida (Lampreys), Holocephali (Chimaeras), Elasmobranchii (Sharks and Batoids), Actinopterygii (Ray-Finned Fish), and Sarcopterygii (Lobe-Finned Fish), these taxa were traditionally ranked as subclasses, but were revised as separate classes from each other, therefore making the former taxa Cyclostomata, Chondrichthyes, and Osteichthyes paraphyletic.

I would erase 5 billion humans out of existence.....

@@xossiie3495 yes, and I would erase the rich

@@Tomas-qk5fy wtf did everyone named Richard do to you?

If only it was possible..

@@Tomas-qk5fy bro the rich are what ruined my country.... They robbed and stole every valuable thing and cuz of them we have 2 hours of electricity a day and rarely get water or any basic food supply.... Btw can u guess the country?

Lol

Humans: We are true survivors... Gaia: Hold my Scotch on the rapidly melting rocks...

Which doesn't even taste that great, fake shark fin soup in facf tastes much better.

@@ANTSEMUT1 Yes, I've been told it adds no flavour at all, just a pointless "cool" ingredient to add. How ridiculous eh? Not that this is by any means the only reason were endangering them, think it's by far mainly nets from industrial fishing.

Lol the human race is going to be decimated in the blink of an eye when the next world war happens. Hopefully sooner rather than later. And when artificial intelligence becomes sentient whatever humans remain will probably be wiped out.

I can imagine sharks surviving for maximum 500 million more years!

@@eybaza6018 I wonder what Earth will be like by then? Can you guess?

@@UnwantedGhost1 idk, its gonna be a little hotter and landmasses might change entirely, but sharks know no time limit!

@@UnwantedGhost1 knowing my luck, we'll probably be hit by another oversized space rock.

so fine

That's gay

Bro ? 🤨

He do be kinda cute tho/p

He is gorgeous.

Sharks aren't near extinction. There are a select few subspecies of ground sharks that are all found off the coast of Africa. Do you want to tell poor African they should stop fishing?

@@c_f0rce If you look at the trends of all sharks populations over time, you'd see that their populations are drastically going down. If apex predators populations are brought down too much or if they are made extinct that has a catastrophic effect of the ecosystem. Overfishing, climate change, ocean acidification migration patterns changing and many other causes are making it so sharks overall are going extinct.

@@c_f0rce Lol I do

@@linkthepig4219 bruh

@@thegameranch5935 I mean... I care more about some of my favourite animals ever dying out entierly over random humans that I don't know. Don't know why that's controversial to say.

@@blokin5039 Thanks for the compliment m8.

I think, so long as we can remind people of the importance of sharks, they'll always have a chance. Sadly we'll never be rid of something so daft as shark fin soup and its made up medical benefits, but we can push for sustainable harvesting and more laws regarding bycatch prevention.

"How can someone enjoy his or her burger when it is known how the meat is "harvested". Obviously it's different but the wording used in your comment bothered me. I agree that sharks shouldn't be killed without restriction (there should be a hunting season or something). But outright banning killing sharks is dumb. There are plenty of fish we kill in massive quantities but you wouldn't give a damn about them, probably just because "there are more of them." or something. Sorry, something about your comment rubbed me the wrong way and I couldn't say nothing.

@@resurrectedhelicoprion maybe, but usually fish with large populations greatly benefit the ecosystem as they give a lot of food and sometimes symbiotic relationships to local predators. (I also love ur profile name. The helicoprion is one of my favorite extinct sharks)

Megalodon sounds like a mafiosi started a career as super villain.

@@Andreas_42 *Yup*

Can survive in places it never needs to, gets bodied by amoebas.

Tardigrades? Mere whimps... . As top contender for badass organisms that might well be the only living organism to survive the current and ongoing mass extinction - I give you... 'Conan the Bacterium' . *Deinococcus radiodurans* // ... An extremophilic bacterium and one of the most radiation-resistant organisms known. It can survive cold, dehydration, vacuum, and acid, and therefore is known as a *polyextremophile.* It has been listed as the world's toughest known bacterium in The Guinness Book Of World Records. The name *Deinococcus radiodurans* derives from the Ancient Greek δεινός (deinos) and κόκκος (kokkos) meaning "terrible grain/berry" and the Latin radius and durare, meaning "radiation surviving". The species was formerly called Micrococcus radiodurans. As a consequence of its hardiness, it has been nicknamed “Conan the Bacterium”, in reference to Conan the Barbarian. *Resistance to ionising radiation* *D. radiodurans* is capable of withstanding an acute dose of 5,000 grays (Gy), or 500,000 rad, of ionizing radiation with almost no loss of viability, and an acute dose of 15,000 Gy with 37% viability. A dose of 5,000 Gy is estimated to introduce several hundred double-strand breaks (DSBs) into the organism's DNA (~0.005 DSB/Gy/Mbp (haploid genome)). For comparison, a chest X-ray or Apollo mission involves about 1 mGy, 5 Gy can kill a human, 200-800 Gy will kill E. coli, and more than 4,000 Gy will kill the radiation-resistant tardigrade. // . en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinococcus_radiodurans

@@misanthropicservitorofmars2116 The goal isn't being the top predator, it's just sticking around as long as possible

Having self awareness sadly reduces our will to live smh.

@@just_a_guy9688 maybe for self hating millennials lmao

@@naturesfrontier1745 If you're gonna try dunking on 34 year olds, you should at least try spelling millennials correctly lmao

@@lotsofuwuenergy3983 lmao thanks for the correction. Though I wasn't trying to "dunk" on anyone

We've explored not even 10% of the ocean...

@@jacobhoover1654 right but between fishing and pollution we are ruining the oceans. Check out the garbage continents we have made

we will probably die off before them

@@placeholder3863 you should see, they cut fins off sharks and toss them back in, certain species are already very scarse

@@4evermilkman Will sharks survive the human race? They will because at the rate we are going, humans are going to go extinct yes, many, maybe even most organisms will go extinct, but they will evolve and change as they always have we on the other hand haven’t evolved, haven’t changed we instead relying on these broken systems which harm the planet and ourselves if we don’t change we will go extinct this is our great filter and mass extinction

Wait really, damm that sucks

@@tiashadrows3469 Yeah! God, I hate those people.

@@tiashadrows3469 yeah I'm not surprised if the Chinese are one of the countries guilty

Counter theory: Cepholopods are even better.

well a torpedo with teeth. is fairly close to an ultimate simplification of a killing machine of the sea. so you my have a point mate. :)

Silly you, we all know that crabs are the peek of evolution.

*CRAB*