We were colonized by foreigners for a 1000 years. Finally, we have Swaraj
@ghazanfardar1630Ай бұрын
Try to remove the narrow religious extremist prejudice from your brain & only then you would understand what do the words "colonisation" and "settlement" mean.
@nikhildeshmukh6221Ай бұрын
Pakka anghbhkt aya from cow belt jahil Hindi states
@GSR356Ай бұрын
@@ghazanfardar1630cultural subjugation is the worst kind as it destroys the social fabric of a civilisation- see what happened in Mesopotamia, Persia and Egypt - language, religion, society and its people all destroyed. Mughals were invaders, some of them decided to settle down and pushed their culture and religion but people pushed back and that’s the reason Bharat/ India is still strong and will continue to gain strength of a super power (its natural state) and there is nothing invaders can do about it!
@ghazanfardar1630Ай бұрын
@@GSR356 The Muslim rule of India did not begin with the Mughal Empire. A strong Indo-Muslim society based on pluralism and tolerance had already evolved after the Arabs rule of Sindh & with the establishment of Delhi Sultanate. India survived and progressed due to successful fusion of various cultures, religions and languages. Today, you are telling us that India would become a superpower very soon. Had you had any knowledge of history, you would have known that India's GDP was 27% of the world GDP under the Mughal Empire which at that time was more than the GDP of China and America. India's industrial production was 25% of the global industrial production. During the Delhi Sultanate, some historians' estimate is that India's GDP was around 40% of the world GDP. India was the largest economy & military power of the world during the reign of Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal rule. You can only understand this if you read the history and come out of your low narrow thinking of a religious extremist & prejudiced mindset. Hindus and Muslims had lived peacefully and intermixed even to the extent of interfaith marriages in a secular tolerant society. It was only after the end of Mughal Empire that the Indian society degenerated and religious bigots like you propped up & made the Indian society a hostage of religious extremism. Better come out of it and open your eyes to the reality and historic truths.
@chadhar7773Ай бұрын
Wow such a slave nation were you sanatan dharmis. Generations of slaves.😂😂😂
@AdityaKumar-rj2ufАй бұрын
The Khalsa flag over Lahore and Peshawar. The Maratha flag over Delhi. Hindavi Swaraj.
@rizwanhussain645Ай бұрын
Murakh, Khalsa were not fighting for any concept of India let alone Bharat, they were fighting for there own Punjabi Sikhs.
@Takecare55Ай бұрын
@@rizwanhussain645No 1, he was talking about the expanse of the empire. Secondly, Hindavi swaraj is a maratha slogan
@AdityaKumar-rj2ufАй бұрын
@@rizwanhussain645At least they were not Arabs or Turks or Mongols. They were Indic
@rizwanhussain645Ай бұрын
@AdityaKumar-rj2uf They were representing the Sindhu lands not Ganga dwellers nor Deccans.Regards
@syedaamir8336Ай бұрын
Maratha were beaten badly by Afghans
@anandagro314Ай бұрын
Pakistan me 1630 se 1850 180 saal ki history nahi padhate hai Maratha Empire destroy Mughal Empire Maratha Empire rule whole subcontinent
@riteshgill7264Ай бұрын
U r 100% right brother❤
@syedaamir8336Ай бұрын
Can you give example of one major battle won by maratha plzzzz.May be panipat
@@anandagro314 who cares bro?? It was kingdom and Conquer system till British period, now we are living under democracy nationalist system.
@radhamohanverma6297Ай бұрын
Mughal empire ,Aurangzeb shifted last 27 year of his life to Conquer Deccan and he died in 1707 .Battle of Panipat in year 1761 Maratha lost and after that Punjab Pakistan and Kashmir was under Sikh empire till 1851
@SomnathBhowmickАй бұрын
Total eyewash 😢 I wish she showed little honesty. When you mention Audrey Truschke, we already know where you're coming from.
@coocoo-pe7ywАй бұрын
Precisely! A feel good factor for them, to fell better for having converted.
@Sobanhassan17617 күн бұрын
Too bad she didn't parroted hindutva version of 'history'. You need to watch Syed Muzzamil types for that😂.
@Sobanhassan17617 күн бұрын
@@coocoo-pe7ywMore like coping mechanism for hindutvadis on getting ruled by Muslims for a 1000 years😂.
@SomnathBhowmick6 күн бұрын
@@Sobanhassan1761 No. You just need to read primary sources which are available in digital libraries of many reputed Universities. And avoid reading history sponsored by the radical left.
@pramedhindra5560Ай бұрын
muslim conquest of India "probably the bloodiest story in history" Will Durant (historian)
@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536Ай бұрын
True
@khushboo078611 күн бұрын
And yet many Hindus got convert to Islam..! With will...!!! My great grandfather was one of them...! Love from Pakistan... My grandpa came here from Jaipur. He was a Rajput converted Muslim!
@Nirmanyu9510 күн бұрын
@@khushboo0786that "will" is just a garb to not feel embarrassed. Neither you have any proof that it was a choice nor i can prove that it was forced in ur particular case...but the Islamic rulers have categorically mentioned in their biographies that they used to forcefully convert ppl as a religious duty . Nobody can live with the fact that they were forced to join a religion so they tell their descendents that this was a choice...I know you gonna come back and argue this but that's a fact
@sugeetsunder843Ай бұрын
Read about why marriages happen in the middle of night, read about Sikhism, jazia etc. why not just accept the truth?
@MytbustrАй бұрын
Sikh indeed helped shah alam...against Marathas...hearing Sikhs are coming Marathas tan away from Delhi when shah alam sister asked for Sikh sardars to intervene...Britishers even changed their plan to capture Delhi..hearing Sikhs are there...pata nahi history ke important points miss karte hai ye log...Arte madam g ...kitaabe aur bhi hai ...yaa KZfaq oehe search kar lo...nahi to QAZI NOOR MOHAMMAD Jo ke abdali kee Saath aaya thaa..usne Sikh sardaro ke baate me Kya likha USS wawt...jab abdali aur sikho ke jungg chall Rahi thee...Apne QAZI ko he par lo...
@coocoo-pe7ywАй бұрын
@@Mytbustr. Are you out your mind! Sikhs helping the Islamists, when the Khalsa was born to defend Hinduism against the foreign desert cult.
@adityasingh2968Ай бұрын
Mugals not shown in bad light in Indian books. You should focus on improving your your own books. Religious extremism is killing you.
@97765Ай бұрын
religious extremism is killing the whole of the subcontinent
@1525boyАй бұрын
👌🏼👍🏼🇮🇳
@1525boyАй бұрын
👍🏼👌🏼🇮🇳
@fun-modeАй бұрын
If you are historian than read the books of that time of aurangzeb how he destroyed hindu temples by sending force
@vijaynair6161Ай бұрын
Fact. Mughals did not rule India. The rule parts. Bits and pieces. Fact. The majority of Muslims in India TODAY have no relation to the Mughuls. Almost all of them converted to Islam with the sword at their throats. Fact. The Mughuls had no great cultural gravitas. But as they had a Moslem “empire “ in India, they adopted Persian (Iran) culture and language. This suggests they were invading barbarians. Fact. The Hindu Marathas ruled India for 100 years between Mughuls and East India Company eventually Britain. Fact. There was never a Pakistan. Pakistan came into being in 1947.
@bhushankalyan3487Ай бұрын
That wealth was not exported from India during and before Mughal rule is not correct. Wars of Central Asia and Persia and MughAls were funded by the raids and plunder of this land. Even the wars between the British Empire and Napoleon were funded by Indian wealth. Infact one main aim of EIC was to ensure the French did not succeeed in raising funds from India, which had a telling impact on the wars in Europe
@ghazanfardar1630Ай бұрын
You are trying to argue from a position of ignorance and lack of knowledge of history. Use your mind & read some history to become educated on such matters.
@elderDimonkeyАй бұрын
@@ghazanfardar1630 bhaisahab aapke lafzo me ek bhi counter facts kam aur bakwas jyada dikh raha hai upar jo mahoday ne bola uske saboot upasthit hai ek ggl searches pe aap counter facts present kar sakte hai ki mughals wealth extract nai karte the
@AdityaKumar-rj2ufАй бұрын
14:34 well one thing is for sure, throughout the the Sultanat and subsequent Mughal rule, there's not one Indian innovator/discoverer/scientist whose name comes forward in influencing the global narrative. Most of the innovation and discovery space os captured by westerners during this period. In contrast, preislamic india is full of such examples of pioneers in science
@ghazanfardar1630Ай бұрын
You seem to be a highly prejudiced religious extremist who has closed his mind and eyes to the realities and history. During the Mughal rule, India's industrial production was 25% of the world. The British colonisers carried out de-industrialization of India. Better open you mind & read some books to gain adequate knowledge of history.
@kartik_9Ай бұрын
Dear Host please tell her, the British did not go back on their own, native Bhartiya thrown them out from Bharat, Islamic Invader's rule did not end on its own, native Indians fought them for 1000 years and ended their rule.
@intellectualthinker2669Ай бұрын
17:15 its not fairness its just their compulsion to treat hindus little better than prior muslim dynasty because they don't want to lost power when aurangzeb tried you know what happened Satnami revolt jat revolt Silh revolt maratha revolt rajput rebellion Bundelkhand rise bengal bhusna revolt Himachal bilaspur revolt And lastly the marathas who force him to died in deccan
@shubhammittal9003Ай бұрын
Mugals are not portrayed so bad in India ..if u read books of Indian history they are all praise of Mughals..India ke bare me perception bannana chodiye
@Sdgutfbb34566Ай бұрын
They are potraied bad in social media. They are mentioned only in ncert no state board student reads about them
@ashishbhatt6874Ай бұрын
According to European archives Mughals killed more Indians/Hindus than Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot and Mao Zedong combined.....Period from Taimur to Aurangzeb was the bloodiest period in human history.
@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536Ай бұрын
@@ashishbhatt6874 famous American historian will Durant ne bhi kaha hai
@ashishbhatt6874Ай бұрын
@@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536 But Leftist historian romila thaapar who wrote our textbooks thinks Aurangzeb & taimur are the epitome of secularism
@ranjitganguly1416Ай бұрын
Mughals destroyed Nalanda and Vikramshila universities while British established Calcutta,, Mombay, Madras... Universities. Mughhals established Harams while Britsh brought railway network throughout India. Mughals destroyed temples, imosed Zazia on Hinudus while British did not destroy any mosque or temples, every one free to follow ones religion.....
@mukundlkАй бұрын
Central Asia se mogul aaye to central asia me konsa aisa architectural structure hai jo mughalo ne waha se laya? Dikhta no nahi. To Taj mahal indian architect se he banaya huva hona chaahiye
@narayandutt_7Ай бұрын
Bhai central asia me kaun kaun si countries thi?
@DrStrange234Ай бұрын
Uzbekistan k videos dkho tb pta chlga Taj mahal is a Combination of Central Asian , Persian and indian styles .
@@DrStrange234 Ha to bhai jab waha itni sammruddhi thi toh yaha kya karne aaye they??? 😅 Ek example dedo na west of Afghanistan K Mughlo ne pehle ye banaya tha Farhana main aur fir yaha aa k uska replica banaya... Secondary thing is Persion Architect main Mughalo ka koi bhi yogdan nahi tha..q ki jo Persian architectural design famous Hui wo sab Cyrus, Darius etc. k time and usse pehle ki thi... Tisri baat yaha aake Jo 2-4 cheeze banayi jaise ki Taj Mahal toh bhai banane k liye paise aur resources kaha se aaya?? Lol kuch bolte ho to logic to rakkho yar...
@nit23sharmaАй бұрын
Central Asia mein Kaun sa sea hai jisme mughals boat building Kar rahe they
@Backlight_1Ай бұрын
While visiting the dargah of Mehboob-e Ilahi, Delhi, for paying his homage (The last Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah “Zafar” (Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah II) had said: This country (Hind) now belongs to God and He can bestow it on whomever He pleases. For hundreds of years, my ancestors ruled Hindustan through force and fear. Now it is time for others to rule. We will become the ruled and they shall be the rulers. There is no reason to mourn, for we too removed someone from the throne and destroyed their dynasty to establish ours.’ ‘Tears of the Begums: Stories of the Survivors of the Uprising of 1857’ translated by Rana Safvi has been published with permission from Hachette. A Legacy of Blessings: Sri Sri Chandrashekhara Bharathi
@vinaypandey2606Ай бұрын
Don't you know that Aurangzeb destroyed so many Hindu temples in Mathura etc. was it political or was it for religious supremacy
@anshulavaniya8751Ай бұрын
They will never accept this brother.
@vinaypandey2606Ай бұрын
I don't understand why you are lying. Don't you know that Aurangzeb imposed Jizya which was a tax for being a Hindu
@mayurgupta7387Ай бұрын
Everything is myth only truth is mughals were saint , they expanded their empire through poetry and embracing all cultural, This lady would even say nobody was collecting jaziya tax from non Muslims and akbar did not later removed it because babur and humayun did not have time for religion expansion so they did not have time to put jaziya tax
@vinaypandey2606Ай бұрын
Don't you know how Aurangzeb killed his brother Dara Shikoh and cut off his head and sent it to his father Shah Jahan
@mohitkumarrai5536Ай бұрын
Maharana pratap and Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj are father of mughals
@Sdgutfbb34566Ай бұрын
Then why did they lose? Akbar fought much fierce battle with Gujarat and bengal sultanate than haldighati. Aurangjeb fought many wars throughout shivaji was not his concern he was 70-89 years old by then
@amitsaha9436Ай бұрын
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Did shivaji loose to Aurangazeb or marathas lost to mughals are you day dreaming. Marathas lost to ahmed shah abdali because of rohillas sided with afghans in battle of panipath and rajputs and surajmal not supporting them. But within 10 years what happened to rohillas and mughals read that. Shivaji died at age of 50. Read history properly. Muslims were invaders they burnt our temples and monuments. So please dont say that they settled here.
@Sdgutfbb34566Ай бұрын
@@amitsaha9436 aurangjeb was 71 years old when sambhaji was ececuted his son murad was slained and bahadur dhah was a child. Aurangjeb played a crucial role in uniting india at his tenure all state were declaring independence. Heard of safavaid sultanate multiple wars were fought by aurangjeb against them at the time of first riot of shivaji aurangjeb was at afghanistan and shivaji never fought directly with aurangjeb his army was very small he did chappamar yudh that's why aurangjeb called him rat. He will attack and run away. Marathas rose in the late 17 and early 18 century
@amitsaha9436Ай бұрын
@@Sdgutfbb34566 Read history Aurangazeeb kingdom was weak and there were numerous rebellions against him by sikhs and rajputs. And about the chapamaar yudh what do the terrioists do now. And shivaji had fought many battles against the mughals and deccan sultanates. As the konkan or marthwada region is hilly terrain and jungle terrain. SO the battles are fought for forts only. Mughals were never liked by anyone in India. They did nothing except destroying temples and looting. What is jaziya please define
@Sdgutfbb34566Ай бұрын
@@amitsaha9436 that's what you will know if you read only Maratha sources. Yes jazia was applied on hindus only on those who created more rukus. You have no idea what was happening throughout India and Tibet region. Ofcourse he was trying to unite that's why there were rebellion not just the names you mentioned even from Odisha Madhya Pradesh everywhere but because it was Aurangzeb entire country remained as a country if dara would have been sitting you would have been calling a district size country as india
@ved3346Ай бұрын
India's peasantry is destroyed by the Mughal, read Irfan Habib's "The Agrarian system of mughal india". Mughals destroyed india.
@pankajjoshi1209Ай бұрын
38:20 Mughals stayed back.. They didn't carry the loot with them back.. Back to where? The Mughals didn't have much to go back to.. Babur had to run away from his homeland.. They were very well off here.. So this argument is faulty.. Comparison with Aryans.. That, recent research has debunked.. It was false propaganda by the British and Europeans to discredit India's ancient superior knowledge..
@NibaranNath-bx4eeАй бұрын
Allauddin khilji must visit Pakistan to recover their economy. It is possible
@BalajiSuryawanshi-qy9jjАй бұрын
KSHATRIYE HAI HUM KABHI TUMHARE BAAP DADA SE PUCH LENA ✊👊
@Takecare55Ай бұрын
5:29 neither the host nor the guest know what happened between aurangzeb and british rule 💀💀💀 Long live pakistani education system 👍
@kashifilyas167Ай бұрын
Ok u will tell us born from most iconic education system country of poor
@Takecare55Ай бұрын
@@kashifilyas167 bro when did I say we have the best education system? Oh sorry didn't remember comprehension requires brain processing easily surpassing your 20 IQ. 👍
@Nitish.SinghalАй бұрын
Mazhab impose nhi kra toh North India mein saare temples kisne tode ?....
@AliMozafari-wm9zwАй бұрын
Don't cry 😂
@Nitish.SinghalАй бұрын
@@AliMozafari-wm9zw only people crying are your Palestinians mussalis.... I can hear them sitting in Delhi 😂😂😂....
@nikhildeshmukh6221Ай бұрын
Aa gaya typical north indian anghbhkt mentality
@saurabhsinha462Ай бұрын
@@AliMozafari-wm9zwGo Israel 😂😂😂
@AliMozafari-wm9zwАй бұрын
@@saurabhsinha462 I am Mughals, Hindus Jeja jee 😘
@LucknowpropertysolutionsАй бұрын
Buddhist civilization 😅 hindu name lene mai fatti hai
@nikhilhembrom8952Ай бұрын
Even Buddha 9 avatar of lord Vishnu
@Aratiii0627 күн бұрын
Buddhist civilization!!!!😂😂😂😂😂
@Kakarot-ec5ilАй бұрын
Pakistani kuch bhi bolte hai 😂😂 inke heros ki waja se Inka ye haal hai
@DipakBose-bq1vv7 күн бұрын
India’s education ministers were mainly Muslims with a Maulana as the first education minister. Aligarh Muslim University which was the centre of Pakistan movement was turned into a national university by that Maulana education minister in 1955. In our schools we read the history of India as the history of the Mughal India mainly.
@GTH4121Ай бұрын
Before islamic rule in India, India had 35% of world gdp (highest in the world of that time). During end of islamic rule and inception of british raj, India had 15% of world gdp of that time (highly lost, plundered and destroyed during 600 years of islamic rule, almost 120-150 trillion gbp). After end of british raj and time of independence of India, India's gdp was only a meagre 3% of the world gdp of that time (due to plundering of wealth from India by britishers, almost 50 trillion gbp). So, Islamic rule in India was worst, compared to the british raj.
@gregario888Ай бұрын
Mm is forgetting something very basic -- there was an intervening period of almost 60 years after the Mughal rule and the commencement of the Maratha rule.
@coocoo-pe7ywАй бұрын
The GDP of Bharat was 35% before the Islamic invasions. The Islamic invasions reduced it to 16% during the Mongol or Mughal period. The British when they left, GDP stood at 4%.
@Backlight_1Ай бұрын
Moghuls like many other Islamic powers invaded India, and so they were marauders!! That was bad enough for the Indians.
@rohand04Ай бұрын
Hilarious isn't it you fail to acknowledge that mugal were defeated by Maratha not British
@FkuIluАй бұрын
If mughal are rich than why they came to India? Why no such tajmahal like structure outside India or any islamic nations?
@muthuswamykannan9125 күн бұрын
Indian history deals with mughals mostly in a positive aspect. Akbar is called Akbar the great. Great respect for him as he was secular and treated all religions equally. Indian history is mainly critical about Auranzeb ,who was a religious fanatic.
@santikarar5705Ай бұрын
I’m from India, with great interest I’m watching this broadcast. Today’s historical episode is really interesting. My heartfelt thanks both to you. Looking forward to seeing more broadcasts in the days to come ❤
@pramedhindra5560Ай бұрын
before muslim invasion India's contribution to world GDP was 33% and it reduced to 25% in 16th century (conclusion India was more prosperous before foreign invasion started with muslim invasion of India)
@tilakmahto8179Ай бұрын
Mughal empire is depicted same way in India as is Sikh rule in Pakistan. You dont acknowledge achievemnts of Khalsa raj, Ranjeet Singh and Greatest General Hari Singh Nalwa. TLP miscreants often disfigure Ranjit Singh's statue. Even Bhagat Singh is forgotten
@shahanarif4295Ай бұрын
Hahaha brainwash Indian 😂😂Lol ranjit singh Singh never conquered whole Pakistan he captured Punjab and Kashmir and Peshawar Pakistan only
Maharana pratap and chatrapati shivaji maharaj official father of Mughal 😎💪😈
@GamingAndTech522Ай бұрын
ohh thats why mughals always top on them they work for mughals 😅
@leenajohn136Ай бұрын
@@GamingAndTech522pakistan ka haal dekh 25 baat IMF jaa keh silver jubilee mana
@Chaudhuri1996Ай бұрын
Not in images.. But in reality both rajputs and marathas were under Mughal 🎉
@Takecare55Ай бұрын
@@Chaudhuri1996Lol whole lineage of Bappa Rawal (founder of Rawalpindi) kept Mughals on toes.
@Takecare55Ай бұрын
@@Chaudhuri1996you haven't even studied maratha empire. ignorance is bliss. 🤟
@sourabh30bАй бұрын
Story of India and Pakistan is just like two brothers of same clan, one day one of the brother demand his own claim, he got it and family is broken, but almighty God see this, one brother is prosperous rapidly and another destroyed day by day. Hope our Pakistani brother think that aspect that two nation theory is curse on subcontinent and religious intolerance of Jinnah and other fellow made the condition worst. Hope they are more sensitive towards Kashmiri people and feel that there actual cultural value and rich history belong to India. May pak prosperous too, we always pray for wellbeing of subcontinent.
@Hindianvlog10 күн бұрын
इकॉनमी में मुग़लों का कोई योगदान नहीं था इंडिया हमेशा से अमीर और समृद्ध था l मुग़ल तो ख़ुद ग़रीबी और भुखमरी की वजह से यहाँ आए थे l वो तो एक फूटी कोढ़ी भी नहीं लाए थे l यहाँ खेती,हस्तशिल्प,इंडस्ट्री पहले से था l मुग़लों के समय कोई भी वैज्ञानिक प्रगति नहीं हुई l
@allbachapartyАй бұрын
Ohh bhai correct ur self. We were never the same. Hindus were always hindus and Muslims were always muslim. In fact Shahjahan was a very religious king. This is a tragedy that because of living together for so long muslims has adopted the hindu culture. It doesn’t mean we were same.
@kishoreshanbhag4535Ай бұрын
Shajahan was carrying dna of Rajputs through Jodabai, however i always remained admirer of Bappa Rawal, Rana Sanga and Rana Prataap Shimh. They were the true Rajputs,, and not like Manshing who compromised his dignity to Ujbake Akbar by giving his sister in marriage and surrendering entire Ralput dignity.
@shahanarif4295Ай бұрын
@@kishoreshanbhag4535hahaha brainwash Indian bakht spotted 😂😂fake history 😂😂😂
@shahanarif4295Ай бұрын
@@kishoreshanbhag4535hahaha brainwash Indian fake history 😂😂😂
@kishoreshanbhag4535Ай бұрын
@@shahanarif4295 what is ur qualification dear?, what is the definition of brainwash, Abdul? 🤑.
@kishoreshanbhag4535Ай бұрын
For your information ,we never consider muslim to our equal, because we have rich history of 10000 years. Even the Arabs don't count u as Muslim's. They call you duplicates. Dare u marry a Arab girl with consent of their parent?,could u dear? 😛.
@santoshjoshi8996Ай бұрын
Aurangzeb's 25 years war with Marathas started decline of the Mughal Empire. After Aurangzeb, Marathas became power.
@ratnakamal110 күн бұрын
Without any understating of the Mughals, let’s put them in context. The Mughal Empire lasted a mere 331 years (1526-1856). In contrast look at the following: CHOLA EMPIRE: 3rd century BCE - 1279 CE. Influence extended to the present day Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Thailand. AHOM EMPIRE: 1228 CE - 1826 CE KUSHAN EMPIRE:1st century BCE - 3rd Century BCE. The Mughals, except for brief forays of Aurangazeb, never ventured south of the Vindhyas. The Mughals were but a brief chapter in the long and glorious history of Bharat. It is interesting that Akbar who showed tolerance towards his Hindu subjects doesn’t find a place in Pakistan, where as Aurangzeb, a religious bigot, is a great favorite for naming Pakistani children.
@schakrabartty9 күн бұрын
Let us recall India contributed over 35 percent to world GDP before Muslims came. Muslims impoverished majority Hindus by collecting disproportionate taxes and building expensive useless maqbara etc.
@MahtabBashirАй бұрын
Wow. Excellent description of Mughal Era, Dr. Sahiba. Although 53-minute duration is a testing time of patience for modern audiences. However, for those who are truly interested, listening without interruptions, it a treat. The discussion covered various aspects of life under the Mughal empire, from internal and external policies to religo-political dynamics, socio-economic conditions, agriculture, and infrastructure. It was a surprising fact for me, despite contributing 42% of the GDP, the Mughals were ultimately overthrown by the East India Company besides facing other challenges. I am also surprised that the host did not touch upon the education policy of the Mughal era. Many were eager to hear about this, especially considering criticisms from scholars like Dr. Pervaiz Hoodbhai, who sarcastically, remarked that "while the Mughals were building the Taj Mahal or other monuments, the West was establishing prestigious universities like Oxford and Harvard etc". Also, listening this whole conversation, I guess, one major factor contributing to the decline of the Mughals was the Hindu powers' revolt against the later Mughal dynasties, if so, it definitely shows that the defense system of the Mughals was insufficient. And last but indeed not the least, the legacy of Mughals in shape of monuments, majority of them are in Pakistan, but the revenue generated monuments are part of India. May be we are not good in promotion of tourism sector. :)
@indianatlargeАй бұрын
Awesome interview ,objective replies, without the jingoism that accompanies in every side of the spectrum, however need to understand how can you whitewash aurangazeb who has left copious documents of his rule onhiw he intends to oppress the kafirs, also their disdain f o local Muslims vis-a-vis the Persian imporrts
@Cmr_5vifailАй бұрын
Vijaya nagar Empire was ,much richer ,much longer and more powerful than Those chaprasi Moguls ,btw the majority converts are treated as a k8nd of dirt by Muguls and employeed Iranian,Turks or Rajputs
@bibtya390215 күн бұрын
Mughals defeted by Marathas and marathas defeated by British
@user-jz6vo5hx5oАй бұрын
*Economic_growth* I have checked the Economic graph before the Islamic Invasion of bharat and data shows that India's GDP share in the world was approximately 32.7% but after the Mughal Empire ended It remains approximately 15%..... *Cultural_Influence* They have tried enough to demolish Indian native culture famous example was Akbar who uninamously forced Persian language for all the official works... according to famous historian Sita Ram In Mughal Empire more than 40,000/- temples has been demolished....and some of temple destruction is also mention jahangir autobiography "khitab-e-jahagirnam" *Political_administartion* They have forced the Jaziya tax on Indian hindu and made them helpless , Forceful conversation is a normal practice ......Read autobiography of aurangzeb what was his thoughts about Hindus .....Islamic architecture was forced on Hindus
@yunuschitadwala1371Ай бұрын
She does not analyse. She speaks in general terms. Her history is like patch work quilt. Still her presentation is is good.
@captainjackroseАй бұрын
Neraj Rai Indian Genetics expert. You must listen to him on his studies on Aryan invasion myth.
@deepakseth6256Ай бұрын
Mughal period was comparatively a period of peace and prosperity
@vinaypandey2606Ай бұрын
First time I am seeing such a biased and ignorant narrative from a historian
@venkysachan2055Күн бұрын
agar mughal doosare religions ke sath fair treatment karte the to mughals ne 30000+ Hindu aur Jain temples ko kyo toda tha aur Shri Guru Gobind Singh ji ke Shahibzado ko kyo maara tha?
@Ajeet_KumarrАй бұрын
🙏🙄👍❤️👌kamal yeh "Mahal, kile, majar"sabhi ban baye "Lakin school, collage, University "nhi jo Hindustan, Pakistan mein the thod diye "Tashasila, Nalanda "
@umar_mughal.3861Күн бұрын
Mughals were Chinese.. Mongols.. Northern china..
@SuryanarayanaJagarlapudiАй бұрын
This lady is an extraordinary person who was setting out the facts as they are.
@AMITKUMAR-bv7qmАй бұрын
Madam ko ye batana chahiye ki muslims economically aur socially kya add kiye? Jab invaders the fir addition kaise kar sakte hain😂 Jab Europe dark age se nikal kar scientific advancement ke towards move kar rha tha during 14th and 15th centuries tab ye so called Muslim rulers kar kya rahe the? Kya unhone waise institutions develop ki?
@gopuparacode3402Ай бұрын
What about Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh ji's sons?
@moidahmed11216 күн бұрын
There is a great difference between a nation and a kingdom. The right wing today portray today's India as great nation kingdom of yester years. It is concocted narrative.
@saurabhshete23596 сағат бұрын
mughal empire or british empire ke bich me maratha empire ne 144 (1674-1818) years raj kiya tha india me.. britishers khud kehte the ki hunme bharat ko marathose lia hai mughalonse se nahi...lagta hai bich me ki history pakistan me padhate nahi hai
@shubhangbahadur7112Ай бұрын
The Mughals aren’t portrayed in bad light altogether in India. Akbar, Humayun, Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Bahadur Shah Zafar are much celebrated rulers in India. It is only Aurangzeb’s rule marked by extreme religious persecution of Hindus and Sikhs that creates resentment for Mughal rule among certain sections of Indians.
@hotfun07Ай бұрын
Basically, Ahmed Shah Abdali's ambitions in North West and North Indian Sub continent gave the British or the East India Company the breakthrough to establish a 'Raaj'. British beat the Marathas and the Sikhs, two major Non Muslim Powers and the Mysorean Mercenary Rulers Hyder Ali and Tipu at their own game and became the sole Sovereigns in the Indian Sub Continent.
@abhinavkumar9c01726 күн бұрын
No it didn't. Maratha civil war gave rise and bengal treachery gave rise to it
@hotfun0726 күн бұрын
@@abhinavkumar9c017 Maybe there wouldn't have been a Civil War had there not been the defeat at Panipat.
@abhinavkumar9c01726 күн бұрын
@@hotfun07 not really, it would've caused the civil war to occur early.
@chandankumargantayat8926Ай бұрын
Before brits came most of india was ruled by sikhs and marathas
@deepsareen1Ай бұрын
In terms of % share of Global GDP, Indian numbers have been estimated at 32% in 1 CE (with Global population share of 30.03%), at 28% in 1000 CE (Global population share of 27.15%), at 24.35% in 1500 CE (Global population share of 18%), at 22.39 % in 1600 CE (with Global population share of 17.98%) at 24.43% in 1700 CE (Global population share of 27.36%) at 16.04% in 1820 CE (Global population share of 20.06%) at 12.14% in 1870 CE (Global population share of 19.83%). It is clear that right from beginning of 1 CE to 1500 CE the Indian GDP as % share of Global GDP was higher than corresponding % share of Global population and started declining thereafter- incidentally as Mughals came in (1526 CE onwards). Mughals can not claim having brought prosperity to India which was already prosperous enough to attract Mughals (and others) to invade it. (source of data is article "Economic history of India" on Wikipedia) More than GDP it was stoppage of enlightenment whereby Indian contribution to STEM subjects declined and dwindled during Mughal rule (as is the case worldwide post 13th Century / Post Al Gazali era in Islam's history) only to recover with modern English education in post industrial revolution time.
@faheemshakoor1204Ай бұрын
Brother, your work is the best and the finest among other famous channels. But i encouraging you to also make content of awareness related current war strategy. This will help our people to realise the real fact and situation we are facing now. In the hope we understand that protecting Pakistan is very important in every aspect, socially, mentally and economically.
@HowdoesitworkpodcastАй бұрын
🙏🙏
@pramedhindra5560Ай бұрын
all these protection businesses need huge amount of money which you don't have you are already collapsed people are fleeing scarcity of basic needs of life like food items medicines sky rocketing electricity and gas bills no industrial infrastructures no skilled manpower declining exports pathetic educational standard all these are pointers of a failed country with very uncertain future
@chandraaiyar3228Ай бұрын
Have you read middle school NCERT books from India Dr. Fouzia?
@diabetesasiaАй бұрын
Dr Fauzia episode is quite Lucid and enlightening for us , Congratulations
@RabiRanjansingh-lj7sf15 күн бұрын
Fauzia farooq ye bhul gayi batana ki iski amma saare mughals tathakathit shero maid hua karti thi aur yeh sab manohar kahani isko sunayi hain,isiliye fauzia itni jaanti hain 😭
@shatnermohanty667824 күн бұрын
38:35 you mention that Abdali was an invader and a looter Then why pakistan named it's missile after Abdali ?
@kantamBeautyАй бұрын
Converted muslin..ab tu hame samzhayega history..wo tera dada se puch wo bhi Hindu he hoga...difnetley😮
@vedantkapoor2085Ай бұрын
First of all check the history the british didnt take over from mughal , they take over from marata empire and mind u im not even a marathi but that is the truth if u reserch u will find it easily only if u want to serch truly
@Yours_navjotАй бұрын
Indians❤❤
@YOUTUBE_AMERICAАй бұрын
Mughals marry 20-90 times 😂 I hope Muslim ready to defend this
@vdo787Ай бұрын
Interesting and informative. Loved it.
@akshayyadav10008Ай бұрын
37:50 i correct you , aryans = hindus , aryans means nobal and high value man , it comes from sanskarit .
@saurabhshete23596 сағат бұрын
google maratha empire map.. attock se cuttack or peshawar se lekar tanjaur tak maratha empire ka map dikhega..
@sameerchaturvedi6675Ай бұрын
Yes, the British must apologize for their doing, No doubt about it
@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536Ай бұрын
Why only British? What about islamic invader?
@sameerchaturvedi6675Ай бұрын
Mughal period was a mixed bag we did not have economic loss which we had in British era we should stop all the trade with bloody Britishers also unlike Britishers Mughals Strayed back Britishers are f****** of highest orders felt really good when Indian cricket team destroyed English cricketers in recently concluded World Cups
@quddusquddus136Ай бұрын
Historical events are covered only after taking a hefty dose of steroid. The Arab invasion of Sind is covered flippantly. In fact, it's a prologue to hundreds of invasions that were to follow. In a book "Among the Believers', the writer Naipaul covers this selective killings of a warrior class and export of men and women used as bounty in Arab lands. The burden of history is too heavy. Both the host and the guest are not equipped to carry this load. Impossible to sit through this video. Exist, please.
@AbdulMalik-bl7msАй бұрын
We were never free and we’re not free today. The style of slavery has changed.
@cb9461Ай бұрын
Whitewashing 😂
@politicalbakwaas5872Ай бұрын
I believe that anybody who wants to know the subcontinent's history should go thru William Dalrymple and Shashi Tharoor, because these are non Muslims and telling the truth which is different from what is being common perception now days.
@pramedhindra5560Ай бұрын
I don't know sashi tharoor credentials as a historian and dalrymple talked about Mughal era and India's written history didn't begin with mughal they ruled for very short period if we read the recorded history
@politicalbakwaas5872Ай бұрын
@@pramedhindra5560 agreed that Mughal era was a short span but that is the period which has created controversies and has divided the opinion,regarding Shashi Tharoor is not the typical historian as per say however he is a very well read person with quiet an unbiased approach
@allbachapartyАй бұрын
She is trying to tell you in a very humble and respectful way by saying “courtesan” that means a woman who had sexual relationships with rich and powerful men for money. Synonyms: mistress, prostitute You named it immediately “girl friend” Thats exactly the mean of a girl friend too. In a liberal society its wrapped up beautifully in the word Girl Friend. There is no space of a Girl Friend in Islam. Our young generation need to realize that its a sin amongst bigger sins. ALLAH tala hum sab ko zina say mehfooz farmaye aameen
@Rishiking_1Ай бұрын
Here is NPM NPM neuro program by mulla Who has not their own wisdom 😂😅🎉
@ayeshaayub5044Ай бұрын
Beautiful conversation dr.fouzia ❤❤❤
@jagdishb69943 күн бұрын
Knowledge like school girl 😂😂
@mudassirsohailkhattak2556Ай бұрын
Maddam you are the Great❤ best documentary i have ever seen.
@shayanmahmud6832Ай бұрын
Let us know if you enjoyed this content!🙏
@Cmr_5vifailАй бұрын
De industrialization ? ,Phds in Pakistan are funny ,It is not Muguls it is from Marathas British established their rule .Islamis rule everywhere is same ,
@ghalibthemagnificentАй бұрын
Talk about current problems, challenges and their possible solutions.
@chandankumargantayat8926Ай бұрын
Pretty woman....beauty with brains !!
@imranyousaf53896 сағат бұрын
V good historian girl well done
@erumsajid4414Ай бұрын
Company's tactical moves plus development of science n technology and divisions and enmities among the indigenous rulers proved to be decisive! factors
@usmanfarooq1155Ай бұрын
Very knowledgeable. It is important to rise beyond petty hatreds and focus on facts. Hats off.
@prashantmaitra1Ай бұрын
Aurangzeb alamgir? Pl dont distort history this much? Pakistani r too much
@FkuIluАй бұрын
There is nothing so called mughal architecture in India these all bulidings are Indian native origin tajmahal have 14 room inside it but not a single shrine and tomb have room inside it but tajmahal have all of it so tajmahal is not islamic structure
@zaroonazАй бұрын
TU aisay hi sochta rehay sochna ka koi bill nhe ata😂
@FkuIluАй бұрын
@@zaroonaz 😁 where mugal came from? Why no tajmahal like structure outside India jaahil? Mugal name given by briths also first Mughal king Akbar himself a kaafir he made own religion din e elai. Mughal word came from Mongolia they look like Chinese but Pakistani connect themselves with Saudi and turks 😂