The copper iud is not hormonal and easily removable is not a good term.

Interesting video! What an intriguing analogy! (Factories) I do have a potential correction though: At 0:27 you say “even though a person has already made all the eggs they will ever make at Birth” But this Scishow video says that that is and outdated idea: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcx-gciD3sqzpZs.html&pp=ygUkc2Npc2hvdyBodW1hbiBmZW1hbGVzIHByb2R1Y2luZyBlZ2dz (42 seconds in)

*PHEW!*

@@Gwallacec2 They didn't say easily removable. They said easily reversible. But yes, a better description of type would probably be "chemical".

Lol❤

Noice.

Likewise

Another effective way is to only meet with other sperm producing humans. That's what I do.

I'm ugly

@@vandalbelis544 we know

It’s time….

.

The universe is telling you your gonna get it soon bro

Lmao ikr

its not just you

I know, right? In the 60s they were like "Don't have sex, it's dangerous and you get sick or pregnant!". Now they are like "Sex is great and natural. Hey, what if you are not the sex you were unjustly assigned at birth?". And with they I mean the non-binary demi pan primary school teacher at our town

​@@maxmustermann2197 you should consider one of the many bodies of water near you as a permanent residence

​​​​​​@@maxmustermann2197I was in school a decade ago but our teacher never told us that *"seggs is great & natural (and you should try it too!)"* 😅 Maybe they say this in the west. Not it Asia. They tell us about STDs and Punishment if you do that stuff with < 18 year olds.

Its educational but birth control pills make women unstable and terrible

@@maxmustermann2197 This sounds borderline made up. At best there's some omission going on.

Just in case

Just 3 am things

It’s probably out of curiosity

Cuz your board

​@@zocker8748fr it's 2:47 am and I got recommended I'm like sure why not now I'm going to sleep

This is not accurate. The tail is the emotional one.

So. Much. Sperm.

Yes

Actually, it's very small. It's scaled up

Next level cork blocking.

Was just wondering the exact same thing, sounded odd as hell.

Yeah I have no idea why they’d say that

I would assume a properly performed tubal ligation should prevent the sperm from passing

@@brent9359i think it should ideally but sperm are so small that they still might go further down the tube to where the eggs are and can’t leave

It was a mistake, they fixed it now

It is not about pregnancies. It is about controlling women and controlling their sexual health is a very effective method to accomplish that.

There is no reason to ban them because women should inherently have more rights than a bundle of cells that may or may not be inside them.

The Copper IUD also prevents implantation, which is why it can be used as emergency contraception (and is often the most effective method for those over a certain weight, as the different emergency contraceptive pills are less effective with a higher body weight).

@@northstarjakobs good to know!

@@haqvor education is still the answer. The more voters realize the health benefits of these things, the less they'll put up with politicians using abortion for votey points.

I was wondering why that section was blurred

Hyenas got the middle finger from mother nature.

Now I remember that episode 😅

@@EdwardChan.999 no wonder hyenas laugh so mad hahahaha poor them

why though ??

@@justbehappyandalwaysbehapp9546 Because the lower barrier means it's more accessible and thus potentially useful to more people. Seeing a doctor can be much more expensive (but also simply awkward when it comes to such topics). If colouring "no"s green is the issue, they could always rephrase the question to "Is it available without a HCP?" or such.

I disagree. The other yes/no are in those colors and would be visually weird to not have them be consistent

maybe change the question, like can be obtained over the counter or something similar.

Why do people get those instead of just taking a pill?? Remove your ovaries from your body forever vs taking pills occasionally that usually don't have side effects and can be stopped at any time.

@@lambda653 tying or removing the fallopian tubes is not the same as removing the ovaries themselves. That would have further implications and is usually only done for various medical reasons rather than "just" family planning. As for why some people opt for more permanent forms of birth control? Because they are permanent. Because they can't be taken away by an overbearing government declaring pills suddenly illegal, because you can't forget to take them once and mess up your protection for the whole month (the pill is very time critical), because some people absolutely get a fuck ton of side effects on pills or other hormonal BC...

⁠​⁠@@lambda653For my spouse, it was a few factors: 1) Hormonal birth control _wasn’t_ side-effect-free for them and caused a bunch of changes in behavior and health 2) They had fertility problems anyway, so even if we did want biological kids, it was going too be an uphill battle 3) They have a chronic disease that would make getting pregnant risky for both them and the baby So for them, pregnancy was never going to be a realistic option, and the alternatives weren’t working well, so they just wanted the risk eliminated. But obviously that’s not true for most people. And, anecdotally, very few people get tubal ligations compared to using reversible or temporary forms of birth control, specifically for the reasons you listed. Even for my spouse, who was 95% sure they were never going to want to be pregnant, permanent birth control wasn’t the first thing they tried. (Relayed with permission from my spouse)

​@@lambda653 BE AWARE IT'S ALL MY OWN EXPERIENCE! NOT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. please, I have newly started taking those pills, it's my second month so the effect should be full effect, i feel like a trash bag sometimes because of it, (it does says side effects can cause so many things in the video, but there are waaaay more side effects than that little ) so generally I feel good, but after I started taking the pills my overall mood, and sensitiveness went worse. I feel so sad and in pain bc of things so much more easily, I am not as happy, i cry more. But general mood swings are in the "it's probably still okay to take kind of side effect" list. 1. I generally know myself as a strong stomached person, I can even eat food when it's bad, and still not puke (I rarely eat those kind of food, It’s just that at first i don’t notice just after a few spoons, or something), when have a very strong compulsion to gag (while having a sick throat) still not puking, nothing is coming up my stomach easily. After I started taking those pills? I start my day feeling not good, drink a few sip water or tea AND THROW IT ALL UP, no food thrown up, just liquid. WHY?! it's been years since i puked and now in a month i puked twice? I blamed the first one on feeling really awful but the second time cannot be blamed on anything else. ( i continued drinking the rest, and yes the water and the tea was perfectly fine, my bladder and shit was fine with it even after I threw up in the morning ) SO LIKE, do you wish to randomly throw up and feel really really shit in the morning once or twice in a month just because? any way 2. ye the moodswings, rather sensitiveness, I feel so much more like crying, because of things that didn't even make a chance to make me care for them. Why am I like this? 3. It made my menstruation shit. it does say a side effect like "clungy" menstruation. but its more like.. it started 6 days earlier, and it's been going for 12 days already, i do feel like it can go longer than 2 weeks (, just mentioning a menstruation cycle is usually 28 days long). I do feel generally worse on when menstruating, and the tablet only gives me a week break to let the body flush out it's ... thing. still it writes it still has full effect in that pill free week as it's description says so, i wish no one, a worse menstruation on an already bad menstruation (i generally have fine menstruation it's just so much hormonal stress that i can not take as well that even thinking about it can make me cry) Its description says when after starting taking it, menstruation disorientation exists for several months, check up with doc and stop taking pills immediately. (also i did ask my doctor, if i can make the pill takings more.. flexible, like a longer wait for my period or, shorter maybe, but the answer for a longer wait was a strictly no, and the pills description said i can start take it earlier ) 4. Many or some woman can't take this pill, especially ppl with thrombosis. They'll probably die from it. here are some serious side effects that MY birth control pill says: retinal vein thrombosis: - instant blindness - painless blurry vision, that can go to blindness heart attack: (i don't really know medical english, sorry) - pain in chest, discomfort, English words I don't remember. - in the place of heart, feeling pressure there or fullness (okay i can't really translate all of it, but it's saying a bunch physical discomfort like things, like heavy breathing and out of breath all the time) stroke: (it is a longer list than the heart attack, but it is generally a heart attack but with your brain :D) -face, arm or legs suddenly feeling numb, or weak - sudden confusion, and/ or confusion in speaking - suddenly walking problem, walking like a drunk person. (technically) - serious, very serious headache - passing out (with a bunch of side effects, they will not pass out like a disney princess) blood clots blocking other blood vessels: -swelling and slight bluish discoloration of the limb -serious stomach ache. angioedema: -face, tongue, or/and throat swelling or/and swallowing difficulties with even breathing difficulties. deep blood vessel thrombosis. - (generally when your leg more reminds you of a 5 year old’s leg on a vacation place they never been (they fell and stand up so much)) lungemboli: like.. between dying of not getting air, and having a cold and drunk a poison that makes you cough up blood.. that’s it’s description. tbh. I'm not that scared of that, bc they don't have a high chance of happening here’s a list of “don’t take this tablet” list: (of you or a close relative of yours have any of: every sickness through depression, skin cancer, liver problems, with even epilepsy and allergies) o-o i just don’t think a person exists where their whole family is as healthy as can be through several generations. so I can probably just link the joke video of this joke meds, where it gives you all the side effects and doesn’t do anything good to your body. Because, this really doesn’t heal anything, it just makes you unable to reproduce.. so.. uh. ye. What's bothering, is the list that are considered common side effects. (1 out of 10) - acne - headache -stomachache - moodswings -breast pain/growth/sensitiveness, painful or unorganized menstruation, (nvm not even menstruation, just general bleeding down there) -weight growth there are uncommon side effects: (1 out of 100) and rare ones (1 out of 1000) with a list of everything. it does contains my mentioned problems. I am not happy. i would not take this pill a second longer if i get worse side effects I can write a 5th reason I will soon stop taking this. The uncommon list contains the pharyngitis which I just woke up with this morning. (it’s summer here, you can only get such painful throat in winter, this pill is bs) I am meeting up with my doctor soon. it is not "just taking a pill".

​@@lambda653 because pills can have side effects like weight gain and depression. Also the surgery only removes the tubes NOT the ovaries

The problem is poor effectiveness. It could help a bit, but would likely result in people thinking 80% is good enough. It will get there eventually, but releasing too soon will result in bad results, and may hurt it's future chances.

​@@eric_has_no_idea reliable once have arleady been finished but got pulled from the market because they had some side effects (headache, mood swings). Not even half of the side effects that the female pill does..but alas women are worth less in that regard

​​​​@@eric_has_no_idea You can increase the hormonal dose, but then that also increases the side effects, which can include a risk of permanent sterilisation and reduced sex drive. Some have also reported suicidal ideation with male hormonal birth control, and considering the significantly higher risk in men it's probably a non starter.

@@Croz89 Right now, yes, its not ready, yet. Women have dealt with that same reaction. Both need more research, womens' was pushed through before we cared about stuff like this.

@@eric_has_no_idea Not to the same severity. Hormonal birth control for women does have side effects, sure, but you don't need such a high dose to be effective. Barrier methods seem more promising IMO.

The chart has a bunch of mistakes… copper iud is not hormonal and the side effects are not correct plus easily removable is not a good term.

It got rid of my acne almost completely, and my periods were no longer irregular.

@@kcninetales5973 Same, it also made it so I could actually attend school. For 5 to 7+ days a month for four years straight I could almost never go to school as my period would constantly make me throw up and bleep so much I was dizzy and faint. Since being on the pill my periods last exactly 5 days and I have never once thrown up because of my period since. People wanting to ban birth control because they want more unready people to have babies are already evil people, but the don't realize just how many people take it to not have life ending periods.

Hormonal birth control has helped me with PMDD and PCOS! And also with NOT having babies at an age, financial and mental state that will do more harm than good 😊

lol bro has not studied medicine and seen his professors leave mid lecture to fix up some 22 yearold otherwise healthy ischemic heart disease patient in an understaffed hospital (ಡ‿ಡ)

​@@laureeeeemaybe just don't have sex...

>suicide Holy shit what

@@burner555 well .. depressive bursts which led to suicide. but tbh .. i find permanent sterilization way more concerning about an intentionally temporary preservative .. but those studies are a couple years old and since media outlets are insanely biased against men all new reports i have seen lately just downplay sideeffects and riddicule men as weak and claim double standards .. once there is something declared reasonably save and is on the market .. lets see .. but i am very sceptical, because there is no such thing as faking pregnancy for men

No, we had multiple studies and many were stopped for other reasons. In most of these studies, the men wanted to continue regardless of the side effects, because these side effects are still better than the ones of the pill in many cases

Thanks for the warning though.

You're sterilized because of having the IUD?

@@1cosmicdebris no I followed up with it.

I heard it can be extremelly painfull to some and unoticeable to others. It sounds like what i want but im scared lol

@@portobeIIa lol I’m not going to lie, every period for about the first six months was like the very first stages of when I was in labor with my kids. Like the beginning when you realize that you’re going to have a baby, not actively lying there trying to push out a baby. A couple days of simulation is better than having a baby though lol it Lasted a couple of days in the middle of my period. But then it just kind of stopped and I had it for three years with no problems.

12th word in the comment be like: 🧙‍♀️ 🧙‍♀️

Girl problems 😅

It was very concerning to me when I realized how little women understand the bc they take!! Tricking your body into thinking it’s pregnant 24/7… no thanks. The studies coming out are scary too. We all knew their diet changes, bloated, etc. but new studies shows it affects who they are attracted to! And that many who who were on it that stop tend to no longer be attracted to the guys anymore 😮

​@@carsonhunt4642studies? lol I study medicine young otherwise healthy women are coming in with strokes ischemic heart diseases DVTs 24/7 I thought it would be way less than that until I've seen it with my own eyes

It's painful and it bruises a bunch? How is that worth it over using a pill? Or having him use a condom?

@@lambda653 I'm very forgetful, so the pill, or many of the plethora of other options, are not a good options for me. A condom is not going to regulate my periods and prevent me from getting a three week period. I use birth control to regulate my periods. I rarely even have the opportunity to need it for birth control reasons anymore. Can't get pregnant if you got no sexual partners. It hurts going in, but I have a really high pain tolerance, and I'm clumsy and hurting myself badly all the time, so my pain tolerance is ridiculously high . Once it's in, it's very bruised, but I barely notice it pain-wise, unless I'm looking at or poking at it. It's just the best option for me 😊

@@lambda653 it's only really painful when they're putting it in or changing it out for a new one. It's bruises, but if I'm not touching it or looking at it, I barely even notice once it's in. I have a ridiculously high pain tolerance, so it barely even bothers me. I'm forgetful, so the pill, or many other birth control methods won't work for me very well. I love that the implant is a set it and forget it kind of method. I use it mainly for regulating my periods, rather than the birth control purpose, so I don't get a 3 week period. A condom isn't going to regulate my periods. I haven't had the opportunity to use it for the actual birth control purpose of birth control for a while. You can't get pregnant if you're not having sex. It is definitely worth it to me!

Free means the government pays for it, that means tax money, that means my money, why should i pay for your unprotected sex?

in ph is illegal indeed

NO questions? That's ridiculous. Free to poor people maybe. What kind of birth control, how long will you take it, how old are you, can you remember to take a pill EVERY day, can we put a dongle in your sex cave and there's more, so many questions. Are you experiencing any pain...? Also they still work despite what ylg says.

No way I'm gonna pay for what you do for your pleasure!!

Sorry iain, I think the Americans with no experience of free healthcare found your comment.

Condoms, like a lot of plastic/rubber products, are made cheaply through mass production. Even is used properly they could have little errors that let sperm leak out. Sperm cells are very small, so even if a gap isn't visible to the naked eye it can still be large enough for it to get through, and it just takes a single cell to risk getting pregnant.

The pill + condom is the best way to go

85% does not mean for single use, these numbers are based on how likely it is over an entire year of regular sex to get pregnant. Defects in condoms can occur. However, that 85% number is just one of many. Most sources are around the mid 90%. Still, it is not totally reliable on its own and if you to 100% don't want a kid, you should combine it with other methods

The way we determine efficacy is really confusing and, imo, not the best method, and the use of the term "if used correctly" here is - while an, industry standard - somewhat misleading as a result. I am not the scientists though. I'm sure they have a reason for being confusing to the layman. Even if that reason is "this is how we've always done it". Science isn't perfect.

good thing I checked this, before I commented, you are right that human cells don't have a cell wall, but it was likely a mistake on their part, they likely mean the cell membrane which all cells have. (I googled it just to ensure I wasn't wrong only to find out I was in fact wrong)

Guess who didnt do their homework

Probably because they're harder to use correctly, therefore less popular, therefore less widespread, therefore harder to obtain.

Also often called "women condom". It's like a very big condom put inside the vagina and covering vulva.

because its used less often, its bacically a condom for women, where they apply the condom in the vagina or the bottom (idk how to say butt in a cientific way, since im not very good at speaking english)

I think it probably refers to the pearl index. Basically, if 100 couples are tracked for a year It says how many will get an unwanted pregnancy in that year.

@@gfrewqpoiu interesting. In % chances I would normally think it as a 95% chance of working each ahh.. "dice roll".

When talking about the effectiveness of birth control, the percentage refers to the amount of couples that get pregnant after a year of using a specific birth control method. So, a 95% effectiveness, means that, in studies, 5 couples out of 100 got pregnant within a year by using that method of contraception. Now, there are some very obvious flaws with that metric, but it's very difficult to quantise exactly how effective a method of contraception is, because of all the variables involved in reproduction and sex.

@@rfldss89 Which is also why, for example, there are different percentages for average use (people forget, get diarrhea, use the wrong size etc), and perfect use. Part of the reason why condoms are so low.

​@@gfrewqpoiu There should definitely be a percentage for "drunk use" as well.

didn't they though ? The jelly thing ?

@@Enden31the jelly they discussed is spermicide that is a topical application every time you have sex. It just kills sperm but it doesn’t lock it into your balls like what what I’m referring to. I’m talking about a semi-surgical injection of gel into your vas deferens that hardens for years. You can undo it earlier by injecting a solvent that dissolves it. It basically emulates a vasectomy without actually permanently cutting the vas deferens. It just blocks them in

​@@Enden31no, that is different. The gel talked about is spermicide. The one op is talking about physical blocks the path. It's like a temporary vasectomy.

It's probably the most promising because it's non hormonal (hormonal birth control in men has either been not very effective or has introduced severe side effects), it lasts a reasonably long time and it can be quickly reversed with another injection. The only downside is it needs to be administered by a medical professional.

@@Croz89 inb4 penis enemas

Well if you combine say condom and birth control pill the effectiveness is about 99.8%, but don't go combining every method as for example combining and external and internal condom has a decently high chance of both tearing.

Some people are in a line of profession where they have to have sex regularly, and to reduce or eliminate the risk of becoming pregnant, contracting a disease, or both, they need protection. And sometimes people just want to have sex. It feels nice and orgasms have many health benefits. So birth control and contraceptives help couples (or single people having fun) eat their cake and have it too.

It was an error in the original chart that incorrectly said vasectomies increase risk of ectopic pregnancy

Mistake. KZfaq would reset everything if they re-uploaded so a blur box is the fastest way to edit.

​@@eric_has_no_idea But what is blurred out?

@@BoMwarriorVlog ectopic pregnancy. It was a simple copy & paste error. A few people saw it, posted, and they replied/ confirmed their error.

True tho

Do you... Do you eat the baby?

@@mambodog5322 lol

"Uh sir, this is a Taco Bell."

Best to email them

Every single cell has a cell wall. Whether you want to call it a membrane based on the thickness is up to you. Human cells have walls, bacteria and viruses have walls, and plant cells have walls.

@@xGEOBOMB11 well, no. The difference between a cell wall and cell membrane isn’t thickness, it’s composition. Both terms are well defined in biology. Plant cells have cell walls and cell membranes, which are different (but related) structures. Animal cells have cell membranes but not cell walls.

@@xGEOBOMB11you’re wrong buddy, only bacteria, plants and fungi have cell walls, the rest doesn’t have them

Condoms, like a lot of plastic/rubber products, are made cheaply through mass production. Even is used properly they could have little errors that let sperm leak out. Sperm cells are very small, so even if a gap isn't visible to the naked eye it can still be large enough for it to get through, and it just takes a single cell to risk getting pregnant.

manufacturing flaws can be a factor..

85% is in general, with perfect use it's something like 95%. the most common ways it fails are tears, leaks, and slipping.

The metrics of birth control are kinda wild. The short version is, there are studies tracking couples who use a specific method for a year and then they count how many of them get pregnant regardless. The metric then emerges from a meta study which basically averages a bunch of those studies. And that's your effectiveness number. With condoms, your single point of failure is just a thin membrane. As long as it holds, it is extremely effective. But when it breaks, it's free real estate all over again.

Bible bashers are already here

@@dawsterTM Of course they are. They're everyone. It's truly a Plague.

There are lots of conservatives that are pro birth control. My parents, for example, decided after twins it was time to give birth control a try. But i guess they're just conservatives, not "angry conservatives" which I'm glad about.

Transphobes and those wanting the handmaid's tale to be a reality are all in the comments.

@@rosieg6989 Just call them Cis Gender and they'll leave this comment section, run back to their safe space, and cry.

This was a big miss on presenter's part... Thanks for bringing it up.

Drugs have side effects? Shocking... 1. Not all people will experience side effects. 2. Some people thought it's worth the risk. 3. Not all of them have the same risk to same person. 4. Please consult with your doctor about them and alternatives.

It should say potential side-effects. Not everyone gets these and it's not like you get all of them if any happen. Also worth noting that side-effects might not have anything to do with the substance itself. The side-effects are reported in a way that they get into to the list if person is experiencing them while on the substance. So for example if you happen to have say headache for totally unrelated reasons, it gets added to potential side-effects. That is one major reason why nearly every drug has basically every possible side-effect. You should take a note on the rarity of it. If it's common then it likely is caused by that substance. If it's very rare, then it likely was something else causing it. Like for example seizure might have been caused by epilepsy someone also happened to have. This is true for every drug, not just birth control.

@@ShadowManceri Almost all side effects are potential, because there's almost never a side effect you're guaranteed to get... The important thing is if the occurrence of the potential side effect is increased for the users. Unfortunately, the aforementioned side effects are commonly directly caused or significantly amplified by hormonal birth control, which is rarely mentioned to the users before getting them...

@@hanifarroisimukhlis5989 there are so many accounts of people who were not informed of these potential side effects before getting the prescription for hormonal birth control that it suggests that the majority of doctors don't bring up the issue on their own at all.

What do you expect from a channel that says "egg producers" instead of women? The black-rock sponsored alphabet mafia has had their influence in this channel for a while now, don't expect quality content from them.

​@@napiski2260 Buddy, you do realize that "egg producer" refers to the ORGAN, not the individual, do you not?

@@somerandomnon-importantper3219 Because saying "ovaries" is too difficult, right, cultist?

@@napiski2260 You mean the literal very first word used in this video? The LITERAL first words used in this video are ovaries and testicles. Yet I'm the cultist? The irony is rich

@@napiski2260 It really is hilarious though. I just rewatched the video paying extra attention to the words used. And the very first sentence they say is "You can think of ovaries and testicles as factories that produce eggs and sperm". So immediately, the word factory is established as a metaphor to accentuate the functions. You're the one making connections that quite simply are not there. And your first course of action when you are challenged is to call me a "cultist". I heavily suggest you exercise some self reflection. One of the defining traits of cultists is an unwillingness to challenge their world view to the point that they act hostile towards any challenge. Which is exactly what you did here my friend