have we tested to see if it is the same on earth if we was say upsiedown on eath ..i was just wondering this after you said ..when they have there feet straped to the floor in space they could still do puzzles ..maybe we have somthing in the brain that controlls thought process that works better when we are or think we are up the right way ..very interesting infomation thank you and your team for all the cool stuff you share

*over the moon intensifies*

How unsafe can space at home be? [Redacted] FOR TECHNICAL DIVISION SPECIALISTS, ENGINEERS AND MEDICAL STAFF ONLY [Confidential Document] Medical complications of Rapid Acceleration Protection Safety Systems on Meteor-Class Assault Craft Prolonged exposure to rapid acceleration protection safety systems or Magnetostatic Resonance Fields (abbr: MSRF): After an average of 11, 10 hour missions notable changes to Meteor V80 pilots outfitted with MSRF included the following. Musculoskeletal changes: Decreased bone density Decreased muscle tone Bone fractures (rare) Cognitive: Neurological impairment Increased irritability Marked changes in motor coordination Cardiovascular: High or low blood pressure POTS Clotting in major veins or arteries of the extremities (rare) Brain aneurysms (rare) Cardiac arrest (very rare) Connective tissues: Joint pain Bulging or swollen joints (rarely in the spine) Separation between skin, fat, muscle and bone layers, if a pilot experiences this condition it is recommened that they are put into a medically induced coma for pain intravenous fluids and if swelling exists drains be inserted until the separated layers can heal together (surgery may be required) Widespread tissue death throughout the body (rare) Organs: Heart failure tissue death (rare) Distended tissue Hemorrhaging (test operators have been instructed to terminate power to MSRF systems on first sight of skin reddening, nose bleeds or bleeding from the eyes in participants) Uncontrollable leaking of bile from the gallbladder and or pancreas (rare; may require medication or surgery to rectify) Kidney damage Liver damage (pilots are advised to disengage MSRF for pain in lower right quadrant) Sudden multi-organ failure (rare) Other: Death (very rare; causes have not yet been able to be determined after autopsy) Rupture (very rare) For pilots [This warning is printed on the left-hand side hideaway tray that must be pulled out and pushed aside covering the instrument panel so that any pilot sees it and has to lift and move the tray to the side and push it into the dedicated space to the left of the instrument panel upon entering the cockpit]: *As little of 40 seconds of continuous exposure to high energy MSRF is incompatible with life,* if you start experiencing: incredible heaviness or reduced range of motion, the sensation of passing out, significant drop in peripheral vision, a metallic taste on the tounge, pressure in the chest or inability to breathe (caused by Cabin Pressure Lock - CGPL an inability for air to move freely inside the cockpit) Or if you experience any pain in the lower right side of the torso immediately below the ribs. **DO NOT CHANGE THE CRAFT'S SPEED OR DIRECTION!!!** *PUSH YOUR HAND THROUGH THE RED LIT CIRCULAR HOLE DIRECTLY IN THE CENTER OF THE INSTRUMENT PANEL BREAK THE PLASTIC SEAL AND FULLY DEPRESS THE BUTTON TO GREATLY REDUCE POWER TO MSRF.* **IN CASE OF CGPL!** *HOLD THE BUTTON DOWN UNTIL ALL POWER IS TERMINATED TO MSRF ACCELERATION PROTECTION SYSTEM (ALARM WILL SOUND, YOU WILL HEAR VERY LOUD CLICKING AS POWER IS REDIRECTED TO SECONDARY DEFENSIVE SYSTEMS AND FEEL YOUR SUIT TIGHTEN AROUND YOU AS IT FILLS WITH EMERGENCY AIR, THIS IS NORMAL).* So pretty dangerous especially if you're a Meteor V80 or SPEAR pilot!

But we are traveling in space. Earth is in space which is moving across space.

@@VariantAEC can you shrink that into 2 sentences?

@@rinnegone377 I think it's about using stuff like super strong electromagnetic fields, But Don't they have those anti-gravity labs which are just spinning rooms that move around in the air? They used it to get Reverse Temperature - Not to be confused with subzero in Celsius (Hell even a theme park could make one of them)

I wonder if there's much difference between standing and seated, on Earth? Some people like to be on their feet whilst thinking something through, it would certainly sell stand-up desks if standing was universally better

@@andybeans5790 i would certainly bet that there is/maybe some difference. Look at our colleagues who thinking standing/presenting but when they are seated, somehow they become a little less "creative".

There’s a possibility that because we have this imagery of being mentally “grounded” , when we aren’t physically grounded we feel mentally ungounded. A type of placebo or rather nocebo effect.

I was scrolling, looking for a Gundam reference.

I remember being out in a small boat when I was 12 for several ours, and when I came back to land and sat down on a chair I still felt like I was sitting in a boat. In my head I was going up and down like the waves, lol.

@@crazywilly85 yup that's how sea legs work lol

Anecdotal evidence here. When I was very young, my family spent over a year on our 44-foot sailboat off the coast of Baja California. I was a toddler when we started so already kinda walking. My little sister was an infant at start and a toddler by the end. when we came back to the US and she took her first steps on dry land, she would take a step and then wait for the "ground" to rock, as that was what she had learned with. Meanwhile I was busy chasing the seagulls with no problems. Now later in life (by about 3 decades), both of us are just fine on land other than being clutzes at times (but who isn't?). We spent a lot of time on the water growing up, not just that one trip. My sister has definitely lost her sea legs with time but I've actively held onto mine as best I can. If it's done anything it's trained me to have a wider stance and be looser in the knees, as that way you can mostly keep your torso vertical and let your legs shift with the rolling deck.

Hmmm. Now I know why so many of us Navy folk came back from 6-month deployments and went bananas for a week. 😜

@@crazywilly85 yes this same thing happens to me when I go swimming in the ocean. I love swimming so when I have the opportunity I tend to stay in the water as much as possible. Then when I go home and hours later go lay down in bed, i usually start to feel the sensation of floating in the waves again. I don't feel it in between those times though, just when i lay down and relax at night after having spent a lot of time in the water earlier the same day. It's very calming. :)

This is Scishow SPACE...... of course they meant the cosmos!

I know Rob said it too... but do you realize what channel you're watching?

pretty good.

Good one 😅

And at some point a baby is going to be born in Mars!

This just reinforces my conviction that the lack of testing rotational gravity in orbit is one of the greatest failures of manned spaceflight. So many of the popular assumptions about the future of humans in space relies on there being some kind of 'gravity minimum' for humans to live without permanent health effects but we just don't know what that is yet because there has been (to the best of my knowledge) zero testing or even recording of sub-Earth gravity on health beyond the very limited duration Apollo missions. As much value testing on Earth in rotating rigs has been to prove that people can be trained to work in a rotating environment, they've all taken place on Earth under full G-loading. We _need_ a gravity lab in orbit.

We didn't fully understand our own body so running into unexpected issues is not that surprising. That being said, running into those issues CAN allow us to understand more. Space allow us to run into new problem and force to see "outside the box" in a lot of stuff.

I would love to try both at the same time

Weird studies on chickens show that long term centrifugal "gravity" is safe. But we aren't chickens, so it may not be as side effect free for us. Also we can afford to send tiny manned vehicle there "yet". Creating monstrous rotating space stations as vehicles would take a far longer time and tech to develop. I don't think people, especially Americans are that patient.

Maybe he has already been & come back. It would explain @ least some of why he is the character he is.

@@wharfrat74 Yeah good point ;-)

Good question

I think it would have the opposite effect of being in space. Because in space there are no forces applied to your body and on land there is only the downward force of gravity, but at sea you also have to counteract swaying forces.

Or diving.

I was thinking the same thing - except in a close confinement structure like a submarine. Even though astronauts are floating in space, the volume of their living space is very small. I wonder if the brain adapts to that?

@@bongosock probably not as extreme as in space I'm guessing

De hecho como crecería en un planeta de 0.5g adaptándose a Nueva presion encefálica provocaría una nueva evolución del adn en el cuerpo y cerebro por compensar, siendo más grande y en un principio más espacios pequeños vacíos en la mater gris.

Since when did Ikea own that idea or come up with it?

It is possible, but requires a lot more work and technology that we simply aren't capable of even making yet.

@@VariantAEC While I certainly believe it is possible, you can't just state that it is without proof. Since we have zero, it's mostly hope/faith on our part.

It would require some major changes to our bodies likely genetic to make it feasible long term. But since we're only starting to understand what is going wrong that we can't begin to guess how we could fix it. But it is interesting to imagine. Again, logically it makes FAAAAAAAAAAAAR more sense to send A.I.s to other systems than fragile bulky wasteful organics. You could send them faster, cheaper and wouldn't have to worry about losing a few or sending them all on one way fly bys.

@@patrickmccurry1563 Since these astronauts were already in space for sometimes a year or even longer at a time we know long distance travel in microgravity is possible. Nothing here relies on faith when we have actually already witnessed it and technically they also covered quite a bit of distance in their time aboard the ISS too. You are confusing time with speed and you are also not really understanding me when I said we don't have the tech to make interplanetary travel safe. Some things we aren't capable of making are adequate radiation shielding which would be pretty essential for interplanetary transit.

I think we would need to find a way to shield spaceships from damaging radiation and to simulate gravity efficiently.

Space tripping in space trip would be trippy

Build a big, cylindrical space station and have all the floors nested in each other, then set the whole thing spinning so that the outermost floor is near Earth gravity. The inner floors gradually get less and less "gravity" until you get to the weightless center.

vibrating shares or in the air might solve a lot of problems

I was thinking the same thing!

Assuming souls if they exist interact with gravity i.e have mass.

@@NoSTs123 No mass is needed to be affected by gravity. Gravity can bend the path of light. Photons have no mass.

The venn diagram of scishow fans and gundam fans are two barely touching circles 😞

This is also what people used to say about flying... now people are doing it every day.

Me too(?)

They use elastic band and stuff like that to create resistance to effort... So this is "kind of" like weight training.

@@bobbobber4810 yeah…I know….I’m just that guy who has to correct people when they refer to “hot water heaters”…..

I said the same thing

i mean, you're technically right but there's literally no other place you can experience microgravity for any significant time period other than space, so kinda pedantic

Not clickbaity enough though

@@corvobranco6896 The only effects he mentions are due to microgravity. There are lots of other things in Space which influence the central nervoussystem of Astronauts on duty, like space radiation, constant noise pollution cramped interiors and atmosphere differences in some cases. I am very pedantic!

Why are you saying that?

Do you just string words together and hope they end up meaning something?

@@AlbertaGeek Maybe... but I'm not. MSRF might not be antigravity (because it-s a system tied to the cockpit of a craft that itself is also bound by gravity, but floats above the surface using plates charged with electricity which produces a powerful electromagnetic repulsion effect against the Silica and Boron locked in rocks in the Earth's - and other rocky celestial bodies - crust targeting deeper underground structures using constructive and destructive field harmonics - depending on attitude - meaning that MSRF is technically anchored to the craft, which is floating over Earth or other rocky planet, but was built with the sole purpose of locking most the objects plus the pilot within the craft to a specific area feeling no more than 3 to 4 Gs of force, negating the effects of extreme acceleration that would kill any human; the craft can go from 0 km/h to roughly 100,000 km/h in less than 2 seconds and remarkably it can accelerate like that in any direction and can go from 100,000 km/h to -100,000 km/h [full speed reverse] in under 4 seconds), but it could maybe, technically be considered a system that might simulate weightlessness under the right conditions because of everything I already outlined in parentheses above.

@@VariantAEC Everything you said was crackpot pseudoscience.

@@AlbertaGeek Using fiamagnetic levitation and quantum locking on the scale of human bodies which are augmented to have slightly more adaptable tissues built the for purpose of surviving in more readily when subjected to these fields, is all pseudoscience? Ok then...

Question: Where do thoughts actually come from? For example: Modern science claims that we have billions of brain cells with trillions of brain cell connections. How exactly does the energy signal 'know' where and when to start, what path to take, and where and when to stop to form a single coherent thought? An analogy I utilize is to spread a brain out like a map. Brain cells are represented by towns and cities, brain cell interconnections are represented by roads and highways, and the energy signal is represented by a vehicle traveling between one or more towns and/or cities. A coherent thought is a coherent trip. How exactly does the vehicle 'know' where and when to start, what path to take, and where and when to stop to form a single coherent trip? A higher intelligence has to tell it those things. But, that is a coherent 'trip' (thought) in and of itself. So, how exactly does our brain think a thought before it consciously thinks that thought? And if thoughts can be thought without consciously thinking thoughts, then what do we need to consciously think thoughts for? Just to consciously think thoughts that are already thought? What then of 'freewill' if we don't even consciously think our own thoughts? And then to further that situation, modern science claims that many different energy signals are starting at various places in the brain, take various pathways, and stop at different places, just to form a single coherent thought. (With the analogy, many vehicles are starting at various places on the map, taking various routes, and stopping at various places, all together forming a single coherent 'trip'.) And somehow it's all coordinated and can happen very quickly and very often. So, where do thoughts actually come from? Who and/or what is thinking the thoughts before I consciously think those thoughts? Do "I" even have freewill to even think these thoughts "I" am thinking about thoughts and type these thoughts to you here on this internet? Modern science also claims we have at least 3 brains: The early or reptilian brain, the mid brain, and the later more developed brain. So, are early parts of the brain thinking thoughts before the later parts of the brain consciously think those thoughts? If reptiles can think thoughts, then couldn't the early part of our brain think thoughts, and somehow pass those thoughts on to later more developed parts of later brains? Is our 'inner self' really just our reptilian brain thinking the thoughts that we think we are thinking? Are we all just later more evolved reptiles? Who don't even consciously think our own thoughts? If not, then how exactly does the brain think thoughts? Where exactly do thoughts originally come from so our brain can consciously think those thoughts? So "I" am thinking about thoughts, if it is even "I" thinking the thoughts that "I" believe "I" am thinking about thoughts. Or so "I" currently think, here again, if it is even "I" doing the thinking. "My" thinking is imploding as "I" think about thoughts. But then again, is it even 'me' that is imploding? I will have to think about it some more. Poof, I'm gone. Is just energy interacting with itself the lowest form of sub-consciousness? Is it even consciousness itself?

_"if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form"_ Prove it. Show the math. Oh, you don't have any math to back it up? Then you're just a crackpot spouting pseudoscience. You don't have a theory of everything. You don't even have a hypothesis of _anything._