How Good Is Russia's New S-350 SAM System? New DCS Asset By CH!
Рет қаралды 39,671
Күн бұрынPATREON: / grimreapers
Mod: www.currenthill.com/
0:00 Overview
2:42 Details
5:01 3d Models
8:34 B-52 Arc Light Raid
14:32 B-1B Low Altitude Raid
17:08 Super Low F-16
20:23 ADM-160 MALD Decoys & Storm Shadow Cruise Missile
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD: / discord
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #S350 #SAM #Missiles #Russia #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
@metallicametallica3314 Жыл бұрын
Can u please do a battle with kinjals and a carrier strike group
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j9Blh8yGxrCspWQ.html
@edvin_hook Жыл бұрын
when will DCS hire CH?????
@jboydayz Жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly
@MattWaller04 Жыл бұрын
For real
@emanuelrivera7226 Жыл бұрын
I’m sure he’s on the payroll. 💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽
@user-mz5lr7zx4s Жыл бұрын
It's stopped to be DCS . And become ChCS))
@waynesworldofsci-tech Жыл бұрын
They bloody well should. CH does incredible work.
@Musix4me-Clarinet Жыл бұрын
*Always* happy to see a CH reveal. Thanks for keeping us up to date. Wow! Has it really been a year?! SuperBaby is quickly moving toward Super______. Toddler? Boy? MiniCAP? I understand that each level of realism they add puts more stress on the CPU, but I would like to see the physics to prevent clipping, allowing all objects to interact with each other. What specifically brought this to mind was the fact that the B-52 wings would break off and clip through the body of the plane. Also, there was a piece/section that appeared to remain suspended in the air after the wind broke off, suggesting that you probably could damage something with the missing wing. Of course, there are all kinds of clipping issues on the ground as well.
@rubiconnn Жыл бұрын
That would be so cool but I don't think it would be worth the effort. Games that tend to have very advanced physics like that also tend to be really buggy.
@tom23rd Жыл бұрын
So you caught the s350 with it's PANTSIRs down. 😅
@05councilmember Жыл бұрын
😄
@alanch90 Жыл бұрын
just a quick sidenote, an S-350 battery has up to 8 TELARs.
@user-mz5lr7zx4s Жыл бұрын
Maybe even 12 launchers for another information
@docauger2032 Жыл бұрын
IT SHOOTS DOWN HELL FIRES TOO TESTED LASTNIGHT
@Davros-vi4qg Жыл бұрын
Wtf!
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
Maybe try rocket spam
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
I’ve been reading on the HAWK SAM and its many variants and many uses by the countries that adopted it. It would be cool to have some of those other variants of the HAWK, different from the one that is already in DCS. Especially interesting would be the most upgraded one and the Iranian version…
@rubiconnn Жыл бұрын
I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure it's already in DCS?
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
@@rubiconnn Yes but it’s a rather old version and it would be really cool to have the newest one because it had so many improvements that it basically might as well be a new SAM system (for example, the fully modernized HAWK could even engage up to 12 targets at once thanks to the Low-Altitude Simultaneous Hawk Engagement system), and/or it would be great to see some of the interesting modifications introduced by (and specific to) some of the countries which used it. The different versions of the HAWK would mostly be great to have in Cold War era scenarios to introduce a little variety (i.e. you could give Iran their own version of the system, instead of the American one).
@guyb7995 Жыл бұрын
I bet the next version of those decoys will detect launch's & locks, calculate distance and MER, turn around, go defensive, wait for SAMs to fall from the sky in chase and then turn back in. That will drain SAMs even completely. You guys should try that with a swag of F16s. Work out when to turn and run, then when to turn back in, keep doing it until its out of missiles and take it out. Same deal for SRAD, draw the launch, turn and run, rinse and repeat.
@crabcrab2024 Жыл бұрын
Very nice, Cap. Thanks to CH.
@tomejkol1 Жыл бұрын
the "yes" at 0:33
@kenhelmers2603 Жыл бұрын
Very cool! Thanks CH and CAP of course :)
@dirkaminimo4836 Жыл бұрын
Omg. That load out is hilarious! Made my morning Cap!
@AdastraRecordings Жыл бұрын
Cap must know he sounds like the Alan Partridge of flight sims? Right? I can't be imaging this... PANG!
@andycrosby1242 Жыл бұрын
lol i always thought he sounded like anthony daniels
@waynesworldofsci-tech Жыл бұрын
Interesting idea - drop your landing gear, taxi up to the radar, and use your guns. Might work with a WW1 style string bag.
@therealdebater Жыл бұрын
Big kudos to Cap and CH. What an awesome duo!
@WarDucc Жыл бұрын
oh nice it is a russian sam with something other then "00" at the end.
@jamieaulbach5120 Жыл бұрын
I was in the 40 FTS, great unit doing cool stuff.
@davidgermain Жыл бұрын
Buccaneer tactics are getting more relevant again. Maybe it stealth glide bombs. Also Cap have you seen the UK Jackel Drone?
@aztec0112 Жыл бұрын
I'm thinking tungsten rods from space are looking better all the time
@trolleriffic Жыл бұрын
@@aztec0112 Rods from God is one of the worst ideas for a weapon ever. How is it better than having the same KE penetrator on a missile that can be produced in much smaller numbers for the same effect and can be concealed and protected from counter-attack? Orbital weapons have to be deployed in truly vast numbers (thousands if not tens of thousands) to keep response times short enough to be useful and they're easy to track and target because you can't hide space launches and orbital assets are trivially easy to spot, identify and track. The fact that no serious work has gone into implementing such a weapon is a good indication that it's not worth the effort.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yeh I'm trying to get CH to make Jackal.
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
@@aztec0112 Tungsten rods are cool and all, but because of the trajectory of the weapon it might be mistaken for a nuclear missile. Which, of course, leads to bad things.
@duskydusk4894 Жыл бұрын
I don't even play DCS but I find what CurrentHill does to be absolutely incredible.
@altPastaTits 11 ай бұрын
for real this is genuinely unbelievable how realistic the vehicles are. the detail on everything…legit masterpiece artwork
@leeroyloke8415 Жыл бұрын
About the B-52 bombers, your mention about the B-52 Arc Light rain during the Vietnam War against the SA-2s made me wonder if you guys could do an air raid combat scenario involving 1960s/1970s period (i.e. Vietnam War-era and Six Day War and Yom Kippur War era) aircraft and AA weapons? The scenario involves your team trying to defend a B-52 bomber raid against a target defended by the same period AA weapons. It's like a replay of the B-17 bomber and WW2 fighter escort vs. 1960s/1970s AA weapons (both SAMs and AA guns) scenario only this time, it'll involve B-52s replaying the Arc Light bombing raid and having 1960s/1970s fighter support.
@smacman68 Жыл бұрын
CH you are an amazing guy. Your work ethic is off the charts! Only your skills outshine your drive. Super Cap gets so much content from you.
@bruschi8148 Жыл бұрын
Holy shit!! 1 already... wow that went by fast. Happy birthday Jr. Super Cap
@stormboy1517 Жыл бұрын
nice @CH, cheers GR
@Tenright77 Жыл бұрын
Nice Demo Cap, Seems like a Decoy(s) and Harms combination could be effective...
@Phil-D83 9 ай бұрын
These systems arw usually layer with the longer range wystems protected by these medium range ones. These are are then protected by short range systems.
@mfreed40k Жыл бұрын
I love the cap solution to taking out the site.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
They didn't see that coming!
@theaxgame Жыл бұрын
0:23 is there a CH Su-57 project leak? Exciting!
@05councilmember Жыл бұрын
Very exciting
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Neg, just some adjustments to the normal one I needed help with.
@Flankymanga Жыл бұрын
Dude currenthill is a Modder with big M.... Very nice pack.... Bravo!
@gtifighter Жыл бұрын
these integrated SAM systems are pretty fascinating. I now wonder how the chinese HQ-9, HQ-11, HQ-22, FK-3000, etc. perform in comparison. Please make it happen!
@altPastaTits Жыл бұрын
what i want to know is if the stats given by china for their SAMs are anywhere near the reality, or if they’re another russia where they claim it can’t be beaten but once put in combat it’s a total embarrassment 🤷♂️ just like their ‘unstoppable’ PL-15s that have never been used in combat….i have a feeling they are **greatly** exaggerating what their own toys are capable of…..
@nemiw4429 11 ай бұрын
@@altPastaTitsChina exported their SAM to Serbia. The export variant therefore we can be confiden is correct. Also Serbia needed good SAM. Thats the only thing that protects them from NATO democracy bombs.
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
@@nemiw4429I believe that China will sell some to African countries as well. And some Middle Eastern countries. I'm intrigued to see that if America stop being in the world powerhouse, how China will treat third world countries. Will she bomb them and take their resources? Or will she be fair?
@glovemaker2 Жыл бұрын
cool! I was satisfied
@bearcatracing007 Жыл бұрын
Happy birthday mini Super Cap 🎉❤
@scarcasmtincap2856 Жыл бұрын
Love it!
@cadennorris960 Жыл бұрын
ADM160A has a unit price of around $30k and a range of like 300km (double the search radar range) so enough of those could be used to completely drain all of the interceptors then use glide bombs to destroy the site.
@stephenfowler4115 Жыл бұрын
The B-52's should be flying at 50,000 feet.
@liamh9814 Жыл бұрын
Good Dad, get 'em into planes early.
@rzr2ffe325 Жыл бұрын
Where to find MALD mod? Didn’t see it on the CH site
@romain5967 Жыл бұрын
Could we see a video trying a SEAD/DEAD mission against this with decoys launched just ahead of aircraft with harms, curious if that would manage it
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yup
@mrlodwick Жыл бұрын
Yes!
@jmtpolitico80 Жыл бұрын
Happy B-Day to Mini Grim Reaper!
@Davros-vi4qg Жыл бұрын
Zoom, Boom, Bap, Blap, Fizz, Bang. Awesome 😮😂😂😂
@razack0404 Жыл бұрын
such a good museum
@USViper Жыл бұрын
B21 Raider? I'm wondering how that would go
@warrend222 Жыл бұрын
Maybe this was asked earlier; but where do you get the modes for the ADM-160 MALD Decoys & Storm Shadow Cruise Missile? Or is this something the Reapers made for themselves? Hoping to get the ADM-160 on the A10C since there is an actual program making this a reality.
@user-mz5lr7zx4s Жыл бұрын
Storm Shadow have jas 39 plane. It is free mod. About ADM 160- in DCS I don't have information.
@sulyokpeter3941 Жыл бұрын
Awesome! GR i have a question. Where is that big old good carrier battles? :( Can you run a Russian CSG vs UK CSG? With all the current assets. Please. :)
@Tuck-Shop Жыл бұрын
Dry docks and tugs aren't in DCS so Russia cannot use their carrier
@sulyokpeter3941 Жыл бұрын
@@Tuck-Shop That was a good one. :D
@05councilmember Жыл бұрын
@@Tuck-Shop😂
@5Andysalive Жыл бұрын
pretty sure he did all possible combinations already.
@bandman6940 Жыл бұрын
So finally breaking down and downloading DCS. Do you guys have a discord community?
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Link in vid description.
@JD-sb4ss Жыл бұрын
Love it! Next id like to see the MALDs go low, so that they get line of sight to the search radar at the same time as the SS’s. That way they don’t need to use up all the missiles, they can overwhelm the tracking system instead.
@jakeslouw3416 Жыл бұрын
With the ADMs: can't you set up way-points for the aircraft and then deploy X amount of ADMs per way-point? That will allow a staggered launch?
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
real life YES in game NO
@Chip_in Жыл бұрын
CH you are a bloody legend 🫶⛳
@omarrufaro5900 Жыл бұрын
Do like a worldwar 3 whit all the nation that has modern weapons
@justinjohnson8398 Жыл бұрын
it doesnt shoot down prsm missiles for some reason
@21Walls Жыл бұрын
Jesus christ, that F-15 with a TALDS infestation is gonna give me nightmares!
@leepatterson5710 Жыл бұрын
I'm guessing the AI wasn't listening with the B1b because they were 1k ft off the ground instead of ~200?
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
I think that was above sea level height.
@edvin_hook Жыл бұрын
wow
@greorith Жыл бұрын
Does it come modeled with all the corruption and incompetence so that 10+% of the missiles fail, the tires blow out, and half the time its randomly turned off?
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
Source
@murman229 Жыл бұрын
Who else heard the intro declaring it’s assassins’ day😅
@MoistGrundle Жыл бұрын
Cap, you damn well know the US doesn't sell the Raptor to anyone.
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
I wish they would.
@kennethnickerson2343 Жыл бұрын
Tow Missiles are no longer Wired Guided, The current generation of TOW missiles are Optically guided and have a range of 4500 meter. The manufacturing corporation (Raytheon Missiles and Defense (Tucson, AZ)) wanted to keep the name TOW as a legacy but the "W" no longer means Wired Guided, instead Raytheon chose to name there missiles "Wireless." The legacy namesake was merely a way to implement an entirely new missile system under the guise of already congressionally approved funding. Despite the deceptive namesake, New TOWs are considerably more lethal than legacy and out of stock original wire guided counterparts.
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
Well, technically all TOW missiles are SACLOS guided and that hasn’t changed. The difference is that with the TOW-2B AERO version, the launcher no longer uses a copper wire to communicate with the missile, using radio signal instead. An interesting fact about the copper wire versions of the missile is that its range or even the ability to reach the target varied based on the type of terrain between the launcher and the target-if you tried to fire a TOW over a body of water, the range dropped significantly (however, firing TOWs over water was generally discouraged because copper wires without any isolation and water are not a great mix, if I remember correctly). Dense vegetation was also a problem because there was always a chance that the wires could get tangled and snap. So overall, the switch to RF not only increased the range, but it also made it much easier to fire the missile over a range of different types of terrain.
@ietsbram Жыл бұрын
why do grim reapers/missles use nautical miles as a standard measurement?
@watcherzero5256 Жыл бұрын
Aviation generally uses nautical miles for distance/range and kilometres for speed rather than miles. I believe its because the first aircraft navigators were maritime navigators.
@leonleeoff2216 Жыл бұрын
Anyone see the video of the ruzzian pantsir trying to engage a loitering suicide drone and failing horribly?? Ruzzian AA is super overrated j/s
@Utubesuperstar Жыл бұрын
I think it’s more so incompetent people
@mr.nemesis6442 Жыл бұрын
Probably due to poor training. The human is the greatest limitation of modern systems.
@leonleeoff2216 Жыл бұрын
Let me know when you find a competent ruzzian
@limedickandrew6016 Жыл бұрын
No, haven't seen that video. I have however seen the video from an Al Jazeera tv crew filming Ukrainian attempts to shoot down that rogue Bayrakter drone over Kiev about two months ago. It massively called into question the almost 100% shoot down rate Ukraine always claims whenever Russia send a mass drone/missile attack to Kiev.
@leonleeoff2216 Жыл бұрын
@Limedick Andrew have you seen the 36 Cessna sized drones that flew into Moscow without any resistance? Tbf they were really fast like 200kph 🤣
@docauger2032 Жыл бұрын
ANTI RADIATION MISSLES FROM THE JAS 39
@mcintyrec1981 Жыл бұрын
Would they be flying that low?
@gail_blue Жыл бұрын
It they locked on to things as low as that f16, wouldn't they shoot at trucks and windmills and trees and cows?
@math.m9495 Жыл бұрын
why in the flat trains I know they use mountain for better hiding from anti radiation missile
@ChucksSEADnDEAD 25 күн бұрын
A mountain would also hide incoming aircraft, which would use toss bombing to hit the SAM site without exposing themselves.
@Andrew_NJ Жыл бұрын
Why is CH not employed full time doing this?
@rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778 Жыл бұрын
New Sam Alley soon?
@chrismaynardTVCC Жыл бұрын
Wait. GR baby is 1 already??!
@Zulgeteb Жыл бұрын
Shees... Lol @ How much is 3 times 12? Forty..?? For the rest great video.
@solomongray6352 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how a helicopter attack would go. Also, why has no one developed retractable weapon pylons?
@billwhoever2830 Жыл бұрын
What makes you think that an attack helicopter has higher survivability than an f16 almost touching the ground? Ofc the helicopter will get shot down by the SAMs. And there is an even bigger threat for the helicopters: in case to reach the SAM site, they will have to fly over at least a few km of enemy teritory, being under manpad threat, AAA threat and close range SAM threat. An attack helicopter can even be shot down with a 50cal machinegun if it accidentaly flies over.
@solomongray6352 Жыл бұрын
@@billwhoever2830 I don't, I just like when they run helicopters.
@Utubesuperstar Жыл бұрын
For helicopters? They have a long time ago look up the Comanche also they generally aren’t practical
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
CH Please create the following-- Avenger Air Defense System, Starstreak THOR, Rheinmetal SKYNEX, Stryker IM-Shorad, THAAD, Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System NSM, Truck Mounted Modular SM-6, Strategic Long Range Cannon, General Atomics Blitzer Cannon, Stryker DE M-Shorad!!🙏👍
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
Plus-- AEGIS Ashore!🙏👍
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
I think that out of all of those systems, THAAD has the largest capability gap to fill in DCS because Russia has the S-400 and the US equivalent would be the Patriot and the THAAD working together and the system is incomplete without the latter. The second place would go to the Stryker IM-SHORAD which now can be fully modeled since ED has added the radar-guided version of the Hellfire missile, the AGM-114L. The only part missing would be the fully modernized Stinger (most likely the FIM-92K version with added DataLink). The huge benefit to adding the new Stinger would be that CH could then relatively easily modernize all other core game assets that use Stingers by just swapping the default missile for the new one and leaving the 3D model as is.
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 interesting info about the sim, thanks!✌️
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 lol no comment on DE M-Shorad? Cap was talking about direct energy weapons in the past a few times ;)
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 I personally really like the Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System! Basically a Unmanned Truck with NSM, pretty amazing! The Modular SM-6 is a game changer, especially if they can go with SM-6 Block 1B! Lol plus Hypersonic Blitzer Cannon and "Hypersonic Air Breathing Ammunition 1,000mile Super Cannon" aka SLRC should definitely not be overlooked!
@iluminas2866 Жыл бұрын
Will we see a Test with the IRIS-T system Ukraine is using atm the IRIS-T SLM 40km range
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
I believe they’ve done that already. The system is included in CH’s Swedish asset pack and a few GR videos featuring the IRIS-T SAM have been out for a while. Edit: Here are a few examples: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hNOXer2e3rbWaYU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJuKa5SavJ69fo0.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ-CbKqGu8m4qZ8.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n5Z3rcWSz6-UnYk.html
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
^^ thanks
@iluminas2866 Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 I actually seen all of these and enjoyed them though i thought it would be intresting to see something similar with the SLM variant wich has double the range and bigger altitude also it would have a much better radar to go with it. This would make it much better against for example the Kinzhal with the better range as the last one was close as.... with the SLS
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
@@iluminas2866 Oh, OK. I misread “SLM” as “SLS”.
@iluminas2866 Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 All good 😊
@totalnerd5674 Жыл бұрын
Question for CH: Can his S-350 integrate with the modded S-400?
@user-mz5lr7zx4s Жыл бұрын
It is simple thing if you a bit know how write and edit lua scripts. But 95 % of players want sit back and wait for someone to make their wishes come true. Bad strategy
@Dirtyharry70585 Жыл бұрын
Hahah so good, even good at friendly fire😂
@Blue2swing Жыл бұрын
Can you guys do Russia's Super Sonic missiles vs USA's Patriot System?
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
They’ve already done that. Just search “Grim Reapers Patriot” and you’re golden.
@Blue2swing Жыл бұрын
@@MaxIsStrange1 Awesome, Thanks!
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
@@Blue2swing No problem 😁
@djzoodude Жыл бұрын
F-35s maybe?
@jimdickson1969 Жыл бұрын
I'm sure your 1yo son had a blast at the war museum 😂
@Stinger522 Жыл бұрын
A very entertaining and chilling video. Chilling because of the implications of this system if it works as advertised IRL. If the Russians decide to add S-350s to their S-400 sites along with the Pantsirs and other systems like the Buks and the Tors, SEAD/DEAD missions will become a lot tougher for the Ukranians to do. Not impossible, just a lot tougher. And what is CH working on with the Felon? I still want to see a battle between them and the Block-70 Vipers.
@russellk.bonney8534 Жыл бұрын
Waddya mean by Russian standards it's a modern system?
@GegeDxD Жыл бұрын
The haters will still keep saying how s350 sucks.
@dontworry6672 Жыл бұрын
why would south korea work with russia on a military system?
@azoriusmage Жыл бұрын
Yeah if they had a war with the North who is going to help them? Russia?
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
Because they're their own And they need to do what's best for them. And stop handling to the Americans, and this is coming from an American.❤
@shaocaholica Жыл бұрын
What’s the point of NATO names?
@Davros-vi4qg Жыл бұрын
Back in the day (Cold War Era) the Russian names of systems were often an unknown. So rather than give away which ones intelligence agencies had found out about, they all got NATO Reporting Names. (Yes some of us here are old 😂)
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
The Soviets had a policy of creating confusion by changing names and numbers to obfuscate true quantities and capabilities. NATO names kept things organized to make better intelligence estimates.
@jasonosmond6896 Жыл бұрын
NATO assigned codes and codenames to Warsaw Pact weapons as they were discovered. The codes were consistent between types of weapons systems, with the codenames being clearly distinct from each other so one would not be confused with another when spoken over a fuzzy analog voice link. Surface-to-air missile systems got designations that starting with "SA-1" and codenames that start with the letter "G", so for example the Soviet S-75 was the "SA-2 GUIDELINE", the S-200 was the "SA-5 GAMMON", etc. Some systems got multiple NATO designations (the S-300 family includes the "SA-10 GRUMBLE", "SA-12A/B GIANT/GLADIATOR", and "SA-20 GARGOYLE") because the variations have important distinctions in capabilities.
@shaocaholica Жыл бұрын
Thanks everyone. So does NATO coordinate in naming their own kit so they can be easily differentiated?
@fluff_ruff Жыл бұрын
CH, please, please, PLEEEEEEASE mod Gl-SDB to be launched by a Su-27 or MiG-29 -cuz weirder, less credible mashups have already been done in Ukraine. Supersonic Shoot and Scooooot!
@aztec0112 Жыл бұрын
Great, another completely invulnerable Russian SAM system. It's good looking though...
@MaxIsStrange1 Жыл бұрын
I have this feeling that following the publicly released specifications when modeling Russian systems in DCS might’ve led to ED and modders overmodeling their capabilities. I get that it’s hard to come by credible information about many of those systems and I don’t have an easy answer how to do “fix” it but I truly can’t escape the feeling that Russian systems get a buff just because their government likes to overstate their own capabilities.
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
Just look at their weapons systems performance in Ukraine ;)
@trolleriffic Жыл бұрын
@@Anarchy_420 In the early days of the war both Russian and Ukrainian air defences struggled and underperformed a lot, but it's notable that the kind of easy kills of AA systems seen early on haven't happened for a long while. I think it's a combination of new software, more experienced crews and proper integration - this last one wasn't really possible at first for either side as the Russians were advancing in a pretty chaotic way and the Ukrainians had dispersed their defences to avoid Russian attacks. Once they both had time to set up properly integrated air defence grids, the air over Ukraine became very dangerous for both sides and there weren't any easy kills by TB-2 drones happening anymore.
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
@@trollerifficAnd when the sad thing is, none of these guys get their news from credible sources, they get it from c n n and fox
@miraphycs7377 Жыл бұрын
considering it is based on a Korean system which have failed some tests before I doubt they are better than any other Russian systems
@stupidburp Жыл бұрын
Korean test standard: does it work? Russian test standard: how much money can we steal before we make up results and get drunk?
@voidtempering8700 Жыл бұрын
@@stupidburpConsidering Russia has some of the most potent IADS in the world, your assertion doesn't make much sense when applied to reality.
@mfreed40k Жыл бұрын
@VoidTempering which has been knocked out by a paper airplane with a pointy end and a firecracker glued to the end.
@voidtempering8700 Жыл бұрын
@@mfreed40k My argument would be which system has scored the longest surface to air kill.
@trolleriffic Жыл бұрын
Pretty much every weapon system has test failures so by itself that doesn't say anything. Even something like Patriot turned out to have performed quite badly in combat during the Gulf War but the US kept using it and improving it.
@MultiSciGeek Жыл бұрын
I'm 10 mins and I'm so confused. You spent 5 minutes talking about the texturing on the SAMs but zero seconds explaining the setup. Are you dropping bombs from those bombers or are the bombers themselves the target? Also, what exactly is the target on the Russian side? For newbie viewers (or for anyone really) a proper walkthrough of wtf we're actually watching would be very useful.
@daliborrasic484 3 ай бұрын
Ma works fantastically in DCS. And a drone from Ukraine flies in and hits Moscow.
@merlinbarlow Жыл бұрын
First
@edvin_hook Жыл бұрын
yeah
@foshizzlfizzl Жыл бұрын
New? This system is around for over a decade 😅
@trichi827 Жыл бұрын
It entered service in 2019.
@foshizzlfizzl Жыл бұрын
@@trichi827 entered service, doesn't mean in Russia it's new. It just mean the ministry of defense decided to buy those things from the company that produces it, ergo it gets a license for deployment. And if you ask Russians, the ministry of defense often has no clue as all ministries.
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
@@foshizzlfizzlThat technically doesn't make it any less new.
@stephenfowler4115 Жыл бұрын
What a boring lack of imagination. Where are the HARMs? Where are the launches from multiple directions? How about B-52's from 50,000 feet. B-2's from 200 feet From a different direction and HARMs coming in from a third direction at the same time.
@azoriusmage Жыл бұрын
You know you can word something like that in a much more positive way
@stephenfowler4115 Жыл бұрын
@@azoriusmage yeah or you can just use a club
@azoriusmage Жыл бұрын
@@stephenfowler4115 Sure or you could respect all the hard work Cap puts into this channel
@AmirShafeek 7 ай бұрын
@@stephenfowler4115Stop complaining if you can't do better what you can't. Cause you don't know how to mod or code, then just be happy with what we have. You are entitled to anything
@poseidon5003 6 ай бұрын
The one area where Russia is superior. SAM systems.
@jakecakestuff1443 18 күн бұрын
Tell that to the S400 site that got destroyed by a 80s era ATACMS missile from Ukraine 😂😂😂
@poseidon5003 18 күн бұрын
@@jakecakestuff1443 Would you PLEASE clue in.
@grantechsweng5268 Жыл бұрын
thx - CH - AceEye60
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 52 М.
Marusya Outdoors
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 66 М.
Frank Wilczek | From Quarks to Galaxies: A tour through the forefront of modern physics | Full Video
The Origins Podcast
Рет қаралды 70 М.
Kuplinov ► Play
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН