Yes, but we all know how expensive it will be in the beginning but cost will be cut as the industry improves. Clearly, corporations would be interested so they will be the first. Computers were lumpy and expensive in the beginning but now cheap. It will take time.
@JorgeFCR2502 Жыл бұрын
Aliens dearly smile: "Earthling tribes are still using air for support and thrust". 😊
@stewie055 Жыл бұрын
You are making advertising for the opposite of what we need environmentally. This shit produce more CO2 per person for one london-new York than my entire life will
@aj_chan Жыл бұрын
While the engines are still in R&D, what kind of fuel economy are they expecting? I can't imagine this helps reduce emissions versus existing planes (which are already not the best in terms of emissions).
@davealmighty9638 Жыл бұрын
No it doesnt. Planes burn more and more fuel the faster they go past the speed of sound, due to drag. It costs 3 to 7 times more fuel per passenger to have supersonic flight.
@vapeurdepisse Жыл бұрын
It's just an investor money grab
@jc1006 Жыл бұрын
I believe the plan is to travel higher so drag will be lower, so maybe there will be less energy requirements
@josecamino2281 Жыл бұрын
these planes achieve ridiculously high L/D ratios due to a sort of compression lift where the shockwaves are redirected downward. L/D mainly affects an aircraft ranges as well as how much thrust is needed at cruise flight. and at high atmosphere, there is not much air slowly the aircraft down so there will not be a need for constant high thrust. these aircraft’s will be viable for super long routes in terms of economic viability and reduction in carbon emissions
@spicesmuggler24529 ай бұрын
@@josecamino2281where will they fly from? You do realise the same problems were with the concorde, and theoretically it was supposed to solve them the same way you are pitching them but the oposite happened.
@replica1052 Жыл бұрын
for starship pointo point rocket travel - spiral/shuffle everyone in with window seats, flight attendants buckle you back in after your zero-g experience
@vapeurdepisse Жыл бұрын
There are like 24 startups doing this. Concorde was a multinational state-sponsored effort similar to the space race. It's delusional to think you can do better as a tiny startup when Concorde couldn't do it (profitably). This is a VC money grab as usual.
@rasimbot Жыл бұрын
Concorde was supersonic, not hypersonic
@lordcranio3032 Жыл бұрын
Flying right towards bankruptcy
@sszibler Жыл бұрын
Lol 2023 for a small, uncrewed version? Come on WSJ! Unless they can make that tiny model do MACH 4 this year, this is snake oil.
Жыл бұрын
Your videos are the best! I am learning a lot of this industry from your videos. Keep going, George!
@Ita_Martin8 ай бұрын
Hypersonic flight is real space flight.The demand will be huge.
@Firestorm637 Жыл бұрын
A few years ago all this cheap money being thrown on all these startups. Now with tight money less to go around
@RobertKelly-it8wm8 ай бұрын
Shhh,❤😊 kylies on telly lad
@glike2 Жыл бұрын
Very bad for the environment, we need a long range mass market zero CO2 emissions aircraft that is a 100% replacement for current mass polluter jets
@asmith2126 Жыл бұрын
Destinus looks like a joke company. Model aircraft flying is not hypersonic!
@kanishkchaturvedi1745 Жыл бұрын
Boom supersonic failed. What will these companies do differently
@HFStudio39 Жыл бұрын
They have not failed!
@Avantime Жыл бұрын
@@HFStudio39 They will fail. There's no market for anything hypersonic other than the military. We don't even have supersonic commercial flights, and if one were to start up they would fail commercially as well. The whole point of flying nowdays is to get the absolute cheapest fare, at a pace that's slightly faster than a bus. For everything else there's Zoom, telework and telepresence robots.
@eddy66t6 Жыл бұрын
... Have we learned nothing? Why do we not have concorde anymore? 🫠🫠🫠🫠