I agree

Seconding this. What they described was fascinating but not accurate to the video’s title.

Same

Same. I was expecting a full fledge ATC video.

Yeah this was more like a glorified ad

Look like they reformatted one of those and rebranded it under Cheddar News...

It also feels like they brought the voice of "how it's made" to do the voiceover

Kyounee huggbees

💀💀 so true!

@@Echoleon I was going to say the same thing. "How It's Made: New York Airports Edition".

Yeah. Lots of butt kissing of the TSA and overspending on creepy x-ray robots and weird nostalgia bait hotels... So all the travelers they delay the flights if (~40%) have a weird place to stay.

well that bill in congrass now is full of pork for failing dem states like NY

@@jamescollier3 lol, "failing Dem states"? You realize that states like California and New York have economies that are larger than some countries around the world? What a completely baseless and asinine claim. 🤦🏽‍♀️

@@kb8170 New York is close to bankruptcy to the tune of $50k per person.

@@jamescollier3 New York has 60% the gdp of the 5th largest economy alone

@@jamescollier3 I can't wait to move to the prosperous GOP states of Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and West Virginia 😉

yea this video felt kinda weird? there pacing sorta felt artificial with the random bits of music and history-channel narration...

If “half as interesting” were to do a video also

Yeah, Wendover is so great

Glad someone else felt the same way. I'd love to learn more about the robotics handling luggage.

Honestly Wendover does the better aviation videos.

There is a proposal to update Airtrain EWR but what they ought to do is bring the PATH train to the terminals.

@@stevenroshni1228 and can add a stop at South ST Newark as well

JFK has the airtrain to LIRR (to Penn) which is the equivalent to the Air-train to NJT the only difference is they don’t bundle the fares like newark

the issue is that the train tunnels under the hudson are already at capacity, so an extra line being added is extremely unlikely

@@stevenroshni1228 this is the better and more realistic idea

What nooo that would cost to much! *proceeds to invest billions of dollars in massive airports*

@@pimmemaster6173 we just need to get these old fools out of Congress

@@pimmemaster6173 Because mass of airports are better because I can fly across the world what a train can only take me to a few cities on the coast where is it’s possible and barely even maybe take me to Toronto?

@@titanicbigship What do you expect? With no investment, there is no infrastructure. You may not see it, but a cargo has more rail options to get around mainland USA than passengers.

@@titanicbigship you sir need to take a look at train lines in europa

SVO, VKO, DME and ZIA would laugh

Scrolled literally to find someone with the same thought

I thought I would be the only one

Learned something new today. Thank you. When I still had my satellite subscription and watched mythbusters, my problem with the show was the stupidity of spending another minute or so doing a recap of something after the 4-minute break. I NEVER watched the show live, I always recorded it, and then FF through the commercials. I guess I should be lucky I haven't had the subscription for over 10 years. Also, let's not forget the huge logo on the screen (of course all channels do it, so it was the race to the bottom for that habit). Does CuriosityStream put their logo on the screen during the shows? I have always felt if I am paying a separate charge for something (a la HBO back in the day), it was a premium channel and must not have ads or crap on the screen. I don't know if the new channels that are out there these days slap their logos on the screen, but I am not going to pay for it. It's why I love netflix and amazon prime video (the real prime, not their free-with-ads channels).

@Zaydan Naufal Here in the States there used to be (and it might still be around, I don't know) a weekly publication that one subscribed to and it was mailed to one's home or you bought it at the newstand. It was called TV GUIDE. Or you would scroll through the online channel guide. Now, in the channel guide, sure there would be a logo and name. No problem with that. So once you saw what you wanted to watch, you select that channel and you start watching. My complaint is that during the actual showing of the content the logo is displayed. It blocks the view of the picture and is annoying (to me at least, since I am old enough to remember what it was like seeing just the content). Some channels also slap on-screen text such as promos for upcoming episodes or other items. I do love my Netflix and Amazon Prime Video subscriptions as there are no logos and no on-screen text when you watch the content from them.

@Zaydan Naufal Does your cable provider or satellite provider have an on-screen channel list that you can scroll through? If not, then yes, I agree that having logos on the screen during the content being shown is helpful.

Wow, what kind of work are you doing on this project? It seems so interesting!; I'm jealous!

Bullshit lies

@@skeetrix5577 little toxic virgin gamer being so jealous?? 👶👶🤣🤣🤣🤣

You're walking* ? Through terminal B?

@@RainbowFlowerCrow local 3 electrician it’s a lot of different things mostly electrical work

You can get to JFK by subway and air train. I have done it. It just takes forever because the airport is so far away. DC and New York aren’t really comparable just like Reagan and JFK aren’t really comparable. DC is a comparatively tiny city and Reagan is a small national airport. New York’s airports are actually extremely far away from the city downtown mileage wise bc the city is so large.

You also have MARC Penn Line linking (not directly but via shuttle) to BWI from 30 minute to/from DC

Newark is a bad airport with a poor layout.

That’s the one thing I hate about JFK - if you have to change terminals, you have to go through security again.

All the terminals in JFK are connected by the AirTrain

The subway already connect to JFK (A) train

It is it’s just some cheap voice over

Yeah it’s basic

The A train goes to JFK.

@@godofthisshit well now i know and thank you :)

As a radar controller, thank you for calling this out!

Here in Singapore there's a huge contrast in passenger experience between arriving by air (via the world-reknowed _Changi_ Airport or the smaller _Seletar_ one that's quite new but more susceptible to weather disruptions as Malaysia is nearby & didn't want us to install an ILS system, claiming it's impose significant building height limits on them) vs by rail (where the long-distance station (Woodlands Train Checkpoint) is a bus transfer (which reportedly can skip your stop sometimes due to congestion) plus a 50min subway/metro ride to downtown) or by coach (with most services going to the decrepit Golden Mile Complex & Tower, with its choked toilets & heavily oxidised false ceilings (some which collapsed over the taxi stand several months ago) that's also had a reputation for sleeze with its nightclubs). The arriving experience by ferry is somewhere in-between though we were embarrassed previously where a cruise ship (either the Queen Mary or Elizabeth) had to dock at our container port ( _Pasir Panjang_ ) because our passenger terminal then was too small. That led to the Marina Bay Cruise Centre being built at the corner of our coastline, but even after adding a train station that's still some 600m away (probably to save on the cost of tunnelling that terminus station's overrun track under the sea if it was sited closer)

You have better food, social services, etc. as well. Thanks

@@Rhaman68 Food is debatable, as Americans might moan the smaller portion sizes.

And to assure airlines, form an air-rail alliance. Deutsche Bahn does this with American Airlines, Emirates, and Lufthansa.

Once you see the gas prices in Europe that'll fix that. If we paid $10 a gallon like the Netherlands we'd be riding bikes too.

@@seanthe100 Not necessarily, the infrastructure should be available first before Americans start cycling. The issue of cars is more because it is the only option than being cheap to operate.

Doesn't even have to be a tram. Even a reliable bus service will do. Even better is a metro system with dedicated right-of-way.

You realize most tracks are owned my freight railroad were their trains are prioritized over amtrak the only tracks amtrak owns is new Rochelle to NYC and NYC to Washington also NH to Boston. The only agreement is the price.

Did you just suggest trains have less land use? That train needs tracks to run over. That is a LOT of land. And no, people wouldn't choose to come to New York by train. Lets say someone is from the second largest city in the USA, Los Angeles, and wants to visit New York City. If you take the fastest train on the planet and give it a straight line to New York City, carving right through the three different mountain ranges on your path, and negating the biggest benefit of trains by not making a single stop once-so-ever, your ride would take just under 8 hours. A normal Boeing 737 can get you there in around 4 hours. And the 737 is competing against a dozen other jets while making a profit charging you $50.

@Zaydan Naufal Space efficiency is the main reason why American freight rail works so well. It would be better if applicable to passenger rail as well.

@Zaydan Naufal Plus, air-rail alliance can be formed to combine the best of air and rail travel. Deutsche Bahn does this with American Airlines, Emirates, and Lufthansa.

As a pilot I say the same. Why not fly in with a ticket that tags in with amtrak. Instead of the 20 minute regional flight that gets delayed for 2 hours all the time

I'd say more like 10/90. Very disappointing.

@@tncookies agreed, I was being generous lol

UNfortunately, the OTHER fantastic piece of aviation architecture at jfk, the pan am worldport, met a very different fate. It was torn down, I believe in the early 2000s

I agree. They should definitely invest more in places like restaurants within the terminals too. A couple months ago, I was going to take a flight and it departed at 11pm, I arrived at 9 as it was an international flight and the only food option available in terminal 4 was a McDonald's. Such a shame.

@@davidmfriedman That's the reason I thought it was gone, but some great aviation history has been kept, they moved our old airport, Schiphol to a museum in Lelystad. But that's an expensive option not really open to something the size of of Worldport. Going the Berlin Tegel route and turning it in to a park can't be done either. So unfortunate as it is, it's gone.

You mean that bag of wood splinters and strings? Yeah, I saw it…

Thank you it's dum