lawl

I see what you did there ;)

beheaded

I do no approve of this.

Our men are punning on the battlefield! ... a Shamefur Dispray!

Nope

100% true these apply to hulagu, mongke, ogedei and chingis

@@kashishsharma8253 Especially Ogedei and Mongke. Batu and Hulagu would've continued their campaign further into Europe and North Africa if not for the untimely death of Khans.

@@googane7755 yeah exactly. But pity they all drank didn't lived long.

@Kurogane -sensei however they were extremely adaptive and learned from others. Perhaps if they made it to western Europe sailing wouldn't be a problem

Exactly!!!!

he said that one that surrendered were destroyed, you cant surrender if you didnt fight at the first place

@@woopro1234 The fighting is initiated by the sovereign of a realm, a country. Then it is up to each region/city to decide whether or not they will remain true to their sovereign and fight, or if they would capitulate as soon as the enemy arrived to save themselves.

@@abdiganisugal825 Yeah, I know

@@woopro1234 ok

And a nice part of europe

Atilla the Hun also conqeured parts of Europe but he eventually lost, the people he beat were tired of losing and eventually beat him. The Mongols could have made it all the way to France but then they would have to pull out because all those kingdoms were very strong so holding them down can't last.

Tethloach1 France was a backwards backwater anyways. Not worth sending troops there and risking rebellions everywhere else. The terrain sucked too and there were tons of castles and mountains and forrests on the way. They still left a single horde to do it but they got bogged down in eastern europe.

I'm sure others will take you seriously once you learn to spell, Ted.

@@sanchirmendsaikhan9299 are talking to me ??

VC3 Productions CK2 is better

Well, I'm off to reinstall the Mongol Empire on eu4.

i still need to get that ;)

@@AJMerrick on 3 : 25 uyou use age of mithology theme,yes?

jućub 111 yes great game back in the day

Prostagma :)

Zhiyu Wang that’s Donkey Kong underwater level

3:05 that's AoM.

@Sher Khan Muslims were the main threat to Europe and reason for the dark ages, while the Mongol invasions caused a great loss for Caliphate, what allowed the Europeans to get back on their feet.

Alexius Comnenus 🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻

Are you ok the mongols sacked and killed muslims they burned baghad then then hundreds of years later when the mongols fell they became muslims

@@ivanos_95 Iwanvs 95 2 months ago @Sher Khan Muslims were the main reason of renaissance of Europe

The Mongols really reformed the places they went administratively and gave them ruthless capability sadly there influence is not found today

@@mperorsimonthegreat3920 He wasn't only Silesian, his forces controlled also the Lesser Poland and most of Greater Poland.

Yeah, actually Mongols are descentant of Hun and fought those Hun's other descentant Hungary

Jose Manuel Ortega not at all. It simply means the east has deep reserves of powerful warriors.

@@ochirsukh.mosgar5525 I guess you're right. That's so funny. Hun blooded fighting Hun blooded, but different descendants.

Bulgarian empire mapping Yes indeed

Enough with artillery only pleeeeaaaassseee!!! 😭😭😭

Dude you're everywhere on WTF CD foxy's vids

@@akkorde who? Me?

@@zorronegro229 no, Bulgarian mapping

Master Big Bird Thanks we try our best :)

I mean when an ambassador came in to your palace bringing a letter containing vile messages, no wonder they would be killed. And those messangers aren't that innocent either since they were known to be spies in a targeted country before any diplomatic action were done.

​@@zebimicio5204 Yeah, I somehow get the feeling those ambassadors were merely used as an excuse to make war, perhaps as a motivator for the soldiers and generals to get them all on board. The Mongols were clearly extremely aggressive and would probably have invaded anyway, which can be seen a few decades into their empire when they just started conquering nations left and right completely unprovoked.

@@zebimicio5204 Nope persians were arrogant. Actually most of mongol enemies were so arrogant that they would look down on nomadic tribunary from the first time they meet.

@@phantomtq who doesn't? When you have an established civilization and then a group of nomadic tribes that were known to invade and pillage everyone that disagreed the slightest with them come in your door step in the name of "diplomacy". Anyone would be looking down on them. In fact no one loved the mongols UNTIL they were pointed a sword towards their neck.

@@zebimicio5204 that's the fault of the arrogant kingdoms then, not the mongols.

Yep absolutely

VC3 Productions Thank you!

I agree

History.mp4 ikr we tend to make these weeks in advance though so I presume it's just bad timing, next video is pretty unheard of :)

Hey bro nice job

Exactly.. Its great Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ..

@Demy Troy savageee

@Demy Troy We do care man , showing pope instead of shah might have made you concerned .

@Demy Troy true nobody cares ur comment

They probably did It's just that we don't have enough evidence In northern Siberia, a Hungarian team discovered the Mongols ruled over more of Siberia, but this has yet to be published in Mass

If Genghis Kahn lived 20-30 years more, he might of conquered all of Europe, Middle East and Egypt.

@Demy Troy You are delusional. Alexander used the army his father pioneered and beat an incompetent Persian Shah. Genghis Khan built an army from scratch and took on the Jurchens, Kwarizmians and other powerful Steppe Confederations. If Alexander the Great had to fight the type of enemies in such a short time and destroy them like The Genghis Khan did, then he would have been hard pressed. Alexander was a genius in his time but against someone like Subutai, Mukhalai or Jebe, he would be destroyed. The Genghisid Mongol Commanders are not some incompetent Persian Satraps who owe their position on their family bloodlines and aristocratic positions. What Alexander did was amazing but when you look at the foes he faced you begin to realise most of his enemies were fools who shouldn't have been given command of armies. You can't compare an iron/bronze age army against a iron/steel age army. The Heteroi would be the medieval equivalent of Medium Cavalry and they can't compare against the Royal Keshig who are better armoured, faced against so many different types of enemies and better armed. The technology level between the two Empires are very wide. Also you have to take account about the information on Alexander. Ancient Greeks are notorious for lying or exaggeration. Everything we know about Alexander comes from his personal historians. Do you really think his personal historians would dare to write the truth for fear of being executed or losing their salaries? Everything we know about the Mongols come from their enemies who hated them. And its the same story they tell; "they came, they beat us despite having less numbers, they killed our young men, raped our women and children and destroyed our homes".

Demy Troy the general rule in ancient Warfare is that the Calvary beats infantry, if you include horse archery , I doubt any infantry could win against Calvary. Even the Romans had trouble with Calvary. Horses mattered in war because the Mongols would be tired of carrying equipment or marching all day which equals to conservation of troops as well as mobility and mass times weight with velocity in a lance charge while being showered with armor piercing arrows. Because the Mongols were so mobile and self sufficient individuals and units they wouldn't be weight down by a baggage train.

People tend to forget the Mongols were almost virtually unstoppable most of the time and conquered their enemies despite being OUTNUMBERED. A great example of this is the infamous Mongol conquest in Europe.

@Demy Troy lmao alexander lose to india

Earth First and one of the best games I ever played 👌

yes its so nostalgic, in the future maybe

Gamerguy 1778 Thanks 🙏 will do

Sam L. a tornado? ok.

THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER

So they tried again but then *died in a tornado*

Flischer no whats the name?

XDD you watched that Japan history video

Are you allowed to do that ?

I recognized it too

Whats the song called

Very powerful on paper and had a wide variety of troops. Their problem was bad organisation and outdated military tactics and equipment. For example using lightly armed Persian infantry against Sarrisa Pikemen. They did however hire Greek mercenary Hoplites but never adopted their heavy armour or fighting style to their native troops. Too much focus on archery and static low quality spearmen. Cavalry was good quality but poorly led. The Persians greatest weapon was not their armies but their Diplomacy, Administration and economy. They basically just kept the Assyrian and Babylonian tactics.

Yes, seems the maker of this video is just read one novel about Mongol Empire and decided to earn on KZfaq. Like for example if wasn't the Jin dynasty the Mongols defeated first, it was Xi Xia.

There are no pictures of jamukha bro

Borgil Batbaatar they didn't reached Germany lol..they got Poland and hungary..i wondered how they would do in forests..against heavy armoured German knigths

@@noman2330 is leigniz German Region?

They almost reached Vienna.

@@noman2330 brother.. they reached leigniz

@@JasonDoe1000 Great Khan died