How QED Unites Relativity, Quantum Mechanics & Electromagnetism | Quantum Electrodynamics

  Рет қаралды 240,308

Arvin Ash

Arvin Ash

Күн бұрын

Go to www.squarespace.com/arvinash to get a free SquareSpace trial, and 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
0:00 video start
3:10 Hard math
7:14 Visual explanation
8:26 Feynman Diagrams
Further reading: David Griffiths - Introduction to Elementary particle physics, www.fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/qed-...
www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong...
Quantum theory solved many problems with classical theory - the photoelectric effect solved by Einstein, atomic model solved by Niels Bohr. But quantum theory had a high price - determinism. it introduced randomness. Events were not deterministic anymore but probabilistic. We don’t see this in our macro world because it gets smoothed out.
Small things move at very high speeds. And so to describe them at velocities near the speed of light, Einstein’s Special relativity must apply. The integration of quantum mechanics with electromagnetism is called Quantum electrodynamics, or QED. QED replaces the classical theory of electromagnetism, which involves continuous electromagnetic fields and puts it in terms of discrete quantities.
In 1928 the first big step to QED was taken by British physicist Paul Dirac, when he published the Dirac equation. It blended quantum mechanics and special relativity. His equation was similar to the Schrodinger equation. Psi which is the wave function is present in both equations. Dirac made a Hamiltonian, which is the sum of all the energy, in terms of space-time. It also has the terms MC^2, and p the momentum on the left side - from special relativity.
Schrodinger equation treats time and space as independent coordinates, but Dirac integrated space-time, into the equation. There are some formulations that result in negative solutions. His equation was predicting anti-matter. No one had ever thought of that before. Dirac believed antimatter had to exist based simply on the math. 4 years later, 1932 the positron was discovered by American physicist Carl Anderson.
Later, three scientists began formulating a quantum theory of electromagnetism based on Dirac’s equation, and formulated QED - Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga. They won the 1965 Nobel prize in physics. The result was a Lagrangian. This equation holds information about the electromagnetic field and about whatever charged fermions one wants to investigate, like electrons and quarks.
In the 19th century, it was thought that two electrons near each other would simply repel similar to the way that two like poles of a magnet repel. Paul Dirac and others showed that there is no continuous field, but that the forces are mediated by the exchange of discrete photons.
When two charged particles travel near each other toward a colliding path, as they get close they will repel each other. In classical theory, this would be thought of as the particles repelling due to a continuous field. But in QED, the path can be simplified to look like a Feynman diagram. These diagrams were developed by American physicist Richard Feynman around 1949 and they help to intuitively understand the mathematics of QED.
The direction of the arrow on the fermion line tells us if it's a matter, or the anti-matter particle. If the arrow goes forward in time (to the right), it is the matter, and if it goes to the left, it’s antimatter. From this simplest Feynman diagram, you can build all other diagrams for QED.
The lines with the arrows represent fermions, and they must be continuous. This is because of the law of conservation. The same number of fermions coming into a process must also come out. Note that a photon is a boson, not a fermion. But if a positron and electron come in, and only a photon comes out, then how are things conserved? The reason is because a matter particle is considered a +1 fermion and an antimatter particle is considered a -1 fermion. So an electron and positron coming in works out to be +1-1 = 0, so the rule still works.
The Key to understanding Feynman diagrams is to know that each diagram is really an equation. One of the simplest diagrams is where two electrons come in, two electrons coming out and a photon is being exchanged - this equation has 7 components. Each of these 7 components has an associated element in an equation.
Note that when two charged particles actually come near each other, they exchange many photons, not just one. Many different types of potential exchanges can occur. But by simplifying the equation to the exchange of a single photon, we can get a good approximation.
The lessons from the development of QED were later used for the development of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) & Quantum Field Theories starting in the 1960’s, like elecroweak theory.
#QED
#quantumelectrodynamics
Electromagnetism was the first force to be expressed in terms of a quantum field theory.. QED is electromagnetism expressed in terms of quantum fields.

Пікірлер: 821
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
I see that there are a lot of questions about virtual photons. Sorry, I did not spend more time on this. Here are a few points that might answer some of your questions: 1) In the Feynman diagram showing the interaction of two electrons with a photon exchange in between - this is a virtual photon. It is important to remember that these are not real photons. They cannot actually be detected. They exist only as the force carrier between charged particles. They allow QED quantization in terms of field excitations. 2) In the Feynman diagram showing electron-positron annihilation, this is a real photon. It can be measured. 3) Regarding the question of how charged particles "know" another charged particle exists, particles have no awareness. The quantum field around charged particles changes such that if they have dissimilar charges, a lower energy state is created in the space between the charges - so the particles move there. Conversely, a higher energy state is created in the the space between similarly charged particles, so the charges move away from each other. I made a video here which may help: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsChfKdi37nRYJ8.html 4) Regarding why the charges exchange photons or what exactly a charge is -- no one knows. It is possible that a future TOE may provide these answers.
@michealmyles269
@michealmyles269 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks dad!
@voges1001
@voges1001 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks this helps a lot. Do we know the mechanism for creating that energy state between the charged particles? Are we able to measure the energy state between the particles experimentally?
@Capnmax
@Capnmax 3 жыл бұрын
I thought my head hurt after watching the video.
@user-wu8yq1rb9t
@user-wu8yq1rb9t 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@MrBollocks10
@MrBollocks10 3 жыл бұрын
@@michealmyles269 Is that Russian for Manc?
@physicslover1950
@physicslover1950 3 жыл бұрын
Dirac was a genius. He predicted antimatter so accurately. 💚💚💚 in the same way as Einstein predicted gravitational lensing, gravitational redshift and gravitational waves 💚💚
@rc5989
@rc5989 3 жыл бұрын
Yes a genius among geniuses.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Yep, I would rank Dirac among the 5 greatest physicists of all time.
@tapferetomate914
@tapferetomate914 3 жыл бұрын
He actually claimed it was the proton, as no positron was known, only in hindsight did he make the connection, that is after the discovery of the positron.
@user-vt5ik1xi7l
@user-vt5ik1xi7l 3 жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh In my list, you are the best physicist of 21st century till now!
@tdhanasekaran3536
@tdhanasekaran3536 3 жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh But he along with his big head physics colleagues gave a very tough time to Feynman when he proposed his ideas.
@BertoldSzekeres
@BertoldSzekeres 3 жыл бұрын
Arvin Ash: I cannot tell anything with absolute certainty. QFT: Exactly.
@granatengeorg
@granatengeorg 3 жыл бұрын
@Brandy Wasay bruh
@osufan8278
@osufan8278 3 жыл бұрын
@Brandy Wasay wrong relative to what?
@themarchoftime3691
@themarchoftime3691 3 жыл бұрын
@Brandy Wasay What Do You mean By Wrong?
@ScienceMessiah
@ScienceMessiah 3 жыл бұрын
@@osufan8278 To itself.
@ScienceMessiah
@ScienceMessiah 3 жыл бұрын
Does “Sergey” originate from ser (spanish “to be”) and “gay”? Turquoise GoluBoy wagon? ;-)
@iron7686
@iron7686 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, it’s awesome to see complicated ideas explained so simply
@tdhanasekaran3536
@tdhanasekaran3536 3 жыл бұрын
This is something very hard to find in science especially Physics but Arvin is an exception just like QED expert the late professor and Nobel laureate Professor Richard Feynman who is also known as the great explainer.
@alexwestby4533
@alexwestby4533 3 жыл бұрын
Very true !
@johnjamesbaldridge867
@johnjamesbaldridge867 3 жыл бұрын
You are really the best science presenter out there, and that's saying a lot. What I REALLY like is your dissection of the equations, specifically what the terms represent. Mathematics is an art. Choosing symbols and deciding how much to compress into each one such that the result paints a concise picture.
@KalebPeters99
@KalebPeters99 2 жыл бұрын
I agree fully! Carefully breaking down equations and explaining their components makes them so much less intimidating haha
@BangMaster96
@BangMaster96 3 жыл бұрын
General Relativity + Quantum Mechanics = General Mechanics Which is an auto repair shop down the street i live on.
@denyraw
@denyraw 3 жыл бұрын
Instructions unclear; Created Quantum Relativity; spacetime is destabilizing into many descrt3 cHп . .: »«»•• ••• •
@blindmoonbeaver1658
@blindmoonbeaver1658 3 жыл бұрын
@xrm160xqw ngl that name sounds sciency
@papsaebus8606
@papsaebus8606 3 жыл бұрын
I love how you actually show equations and explain terms in it!
@LordandGodofYouTube
@LordandGodofYouTube 3 жыл бұрын
Another great video Arvin! I must admit I had to watch this a couple of times to get my head around it just because it's not a simple subject, but once again you made it pretty easy to understand and very interesting. I am in awe of the people who are able to formulate these theories about things that most people don't even consider their existence. It's a shame we only get such a short time on this planet as I'd love to see what science has come up with in 500 years.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Indeed, it would be nice to be around to see some of these mysteries solved in the future.
@Thedanishundertaker
@Thedanishundertaker 3 жыл бұрын
As always brilliant work from you guy’s. Love the smooth transition from the Diagrams to the equations awesome stuff guys. Even at 47 I’m still learning about this stuff and it’s hard to wrap your head around, so that why I love this channel,. Keep up the great work and I’ll see you in the next episode my friends. Stay save all from Denmark 🇩🇰
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. And stay safe buddy.
@alexwestby4533
@alexwestby4533 3 жыл бұрын
I have rediscovered physics at 55: I love it ! Arvin is the best !
@smokey04200420
@smokey04200420 3 жыл бұрын
You know that part that you do at the end where you enthusiastically promote Square Space and sell a bit of your your soul so that we, your audience, can learn from you, even those of us who cannot afford a formal education… thank you for doing that. Your work is teaching an amateur physicist who is currently writing theories that will change current perceptions.
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Жыл бұрын
I am intrigued as to how far you have gotten during the past two years. This recent publication took me about 2 years to research and write: "Ground State Quantum Vortex Proton Model" in Foundations of Physics.
@fourkings7897
@fourkings7897 3 жыл бұрын
I absolutely have no idea, but i really love watching it
@PaulHigginbothamSr
@PaulHigginbothamSr 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Arvin for the clarity of these videos from the 40's which are still incredibly important. Feynman's most difficult mental computation was for spin angular momentum in a superfluid superconductor. He built mentally magnetic flux tubes through the super fluid pinning lines of flux inside neutron stars. The relative temperature is billions of degrees but to the free electrons approaches relative cold at the pressure down inside the neutron star, thus producing glitches in spin momentum and a slight shift of magnetic strength alters the spin momentum of the mass of spinning neutrons causing either a speed up, slow down, or gradual return to it's previous state of angular momentum. These tremendous forces will be found to produce "fast radio bursts", which happens through spin reduction of the angular momentum. The only area it can be created.
@evoun96
@evoun96 3 жыл бұрын
That 2 min introduction in every of your videos was indeed worth to watch. I get a brief intro of what were you about to say on your main focus of the rest of your videos. Great job man.. Many thanks from Malaysia!!!
@TheSaferHouse
@TheSaferHouse 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making concepts like QED accessible to people like me who never took a physics class. Our universe is truly mind-blowing!
@rafanifischer3152
@rafanifischer3152 3 жыл бұрын
I like these short instructive videos. I guess these are made for the intellectually curious and maybe for some serious students who find their professors boring.
@trewq398
@trewq398 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, great balance between being rigorous and explaining it intuitively! I really like that you show the equations and give an idea about what they mean.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 3 жыл бұрын
Please DO NOT SKIP over the explanation of turning a Feynman diagram into a math equation! That is the part we all desperately need to hear, because nobody does that! There exist hundreds of videos already showing how to write out a Feynman diagram, but NONE explaining how that becomes math.
@felicityc
@felicityc 3 жыл бұрын
I can quote Feynman: "The physicist has meaning to all the phrases and there's a very important thing that a lot of people who study physics, but don't come from mathematics don't appreciate: That physics is not mathematics and mathematics is not physics. One helps the other.But, you have to have some understanding of the connection of the words with the real world. If necessary, to at the end translate what you figured out into English, into the world of blocks of copper and glass that you're going to do the experiment with, to find out whether the consequences are true. This is a problem which is not a problem of mathematics at all.I've already mentioned the only other relationship that.. of course it obvious how the mathematical reasoning which have been developed are of great power and are in use for physics. On the other hand, sometimes the physicists' reasoning is useful for mathematicians."
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 3 жыл бұрын
​@@felicityc Waste of time quoting Feynman's personal opinion. Doesn't help answer my request/need for more demonstration of how to turn Feynman diagrams into math equations (Lagrangians I assume of some type). Human law is not reality. Human economics is not reality. Those are just ideas, too. They are not the physical things themselves. Yet hypocritically a bunch of conservatard snowflakes & crybaby losers are whining that Biden won the US election fairly & squarely by making up a bunch of ABSTRACT IMAGINARY "illegalities" to complain about.
@tomgain7451
@tomgain7451 3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful presentation I’ll rewatch this at least 10 times
@wilsongomes3360
@wilsongomes3360 3 жыл бұрын
Me too
@vag3l899
@vag3l899 3 жыл бұрын
By faaaaaaar the most accurate and comprehensive presentasion of QED on youtube.Keep up the great work!!!
@MattMajcan
@MattMajcan 3 жыл бұрын
i appreciate that these videos seem to be getting more complex
@NNiSYS
@NNiSYS 3 жыл бұрын
Hi, Arvin! Ricardo again. Your clarity is beautiful. Thank you so much for sharing it. Thank you!
@TheMuslimMan437
@TheMuslimMan437 3 жыл бұрын
Make this channel fly in the sky because he deserves more than 457k subscribers.
@harshad761977
@harshad761977 3 жыл бұрын
OMG! I have seen these vertices diagram before many times from various KZfaq channels, but I never understood it's technicality. But this video explained it very nicely.
@lucasmergotto5267
@lucasmergotto5267 3 жыл бұрын
El libro "Jesús Fracasoó y Terminó en Desastre", basado en la ley de la atracción, el autor muestra cómo fue la vida de Jesús. Usa versículos de la biblia ... lo recomiendo, el libro es muy bueno. está en Amazon.
@jamessunseri346
@jamessunseri346 3 жыл бұрын
As someone who really benefits from seeing things visually this was outstanding! I love this channel
@brandonsubia9090
@brandonsubia9090 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Arvin for yet another astounding explanation of our understanding of the quantum world!! I mean this with all sincerity you really have brought so much clarity to me of so many of these deep physical theories! Please don’t ever stop doing what you do! Oh, and thank you for that questionnaire about our preferences on the maths. I saw how you incorporated our answers into the way you explained them in this video! Keep up the good work Arvin! You are my go to guy for all things physics!!
@Magis-rt1lw
@Magis-rt1lw 3 жыл бұрын
4:27 We don't really throw negative solutions. It just happen that outside of the mathematics community people just throw away "negative" or "non-sense" solutions without closer inspection. This is, I believe, the work of "mathematician" Paul Dirac rather than just a man of conviction.
@steviejd5803
@steviejd5803 9 ай бұрын
Dear Arvin, what can I say that hasn’t been said? Here goes, you’re content and generous presentation, your character, warmth and enthusiasm are quite simply wonderful. You have the ability to maintain focus and intellectual pace in perfect step so that I can follow along without feeling swamped or overwhelmed. Thank you so much for helping me to understand a small part of reality.
@virajkapani6159
@virajkapani6159 3 жыл бұрын
I might be a relatively new viewer of your content and I do like it a lot. QED is such a topic that intrigues me all the time hence , I appreciate your hard work. Your efforts for providing quality knowledge can be thoroughly seen in this and almost all your videos. On concluding , although I was familiar with this concept before it does provide a good introduction/brief explanation.
@elishmuel1976
@elishmuel1976 3 жыл бұрын
your channel is like PBS Spacetime on steroids. I LOVE it!
@robertw1871
@robertw1871 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome, thanks... appreciate the mathematical approach, physics can’t be separated from it...
@rambod
@rambod 3 жыл бұрын
Arvin, I love how you make ideas easier to understand. Do you have a video explaining why matter curves spacetime?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
I made two videos on Quantum gravity recently where I talk about how gravity works. But what exactly gravity is or why matter curves spacetime is not known.
@rambod
@rambod 3 жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh Thanks for the reply. I've seen those (A+). I thought so too, but wasn't 100% sure. Thought maybe I missed something.
@nightmareshogun6517
@nightmareshogun6517 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Mr. Arvin. I really enjoy your videos!! Thank you for the consistent high quality videos!! I have a question in mind... where do the fermions get the energy to exchange the photons in the first place? Thank you for your time!!
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
They are virtual photons. It is the quality of the particle called "charge" that causes virtual photon exchange with another charged particle.
@adityamishra1185
@adityamishra1185 3 жыл бұрын
The wait is OVER!!!!!!!!!! :))))))))))
@Mikey-mike
@Mikey-mike 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture, Arvin. Well done. I await your further lectures.
@veronicats100
@veronicats100 3 жыл бұрын
This is a good one. Nice explanation of Feynman diags and formulation of the equations. Thank you.
@Petrov3434
@Petrov3434 3 жыл бұрын
Wow - outstanding. Absolutely delightful and enlightening by a true master. Thank you for the effort !!
@arandomguy4614
@arandomguy4614 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video man. I've been watching your videos since March and learnt a lot from them.
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92
@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 3 жыл бұрын
14:30 when you say "QED is accurate to within 1 parts per trillion", what does that mean? Is it predicting the probability of emission/absorption for a certain known system to within one part per trillion? Is it predicting energies to within one part per trillion? Sorry, I got a BS in Nuclear Engineering from UT-Knoxville back in 2010, but this is all still Greek to me. As usual, though, Awesome video Arvin! I greatly appreciate your willingness to teach. You have a gift for describing things so that us laypeople can understand them. Well done.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
It has to do with predicted value vs. measured value. The precise calculation I am referring to is the dipole moment of electrons. Here is something right out of Wikipedia: As of February 2007, the best measurement of the anomalous magnetic dipole moment of the electron was made by the group of Gerald Gabrielse at Harvard University, using a single electron caught in a Penning trap.[3] The difference between the electron's cyclotron frequency and its spin precession frequency in a magnetic field is proportional to g−2. An extremely high precision measurement of the quantized energies of the cyclotron orbits, or Landau levels, of the electron, compared to the quantized energies of the electron's two possible spin orientations, gives a value for the electron's spin g-factor: g/2 = 1.00115965218085(76), a precision of better than one part in a trillion. (The digits in parentheses indicate the standard uncertainty in the last listed digits of the measurement.)
@gypsycruiser
@gypsycruiser 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you ! Great presentation and excellent audio.
@janhavideshpande6189
@janhavideshpande6189 3 жыл бұрын
sir i am from india, and after watching your videos i have started to love quantum physics and wish to work in same in future
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Good for you! You can do it. And the world needs more physicists.
@randomdude3066
@randomdude3066 3 жыл бұрын
8:10 What causes the electron to emit the virtual particle? How does it detect the presence of the other electron and does it need to know the location of the other electron?
@dawid_dahl
@dawid_dahl 3 жыл бұрын
I love this KZfaq channel! Always time well spent.
@janhavideshpande6189
@janhavideshpande6189 3 жыл бұрын
Sir your videos are truly awesome keep making such good ones, keep sharing knowledge.....I have seen them all
@tobiaszgottfriedstudio4090
@tobiaszgottfriedstudio4090 3 жыл бұрын
Great job :) thanks for good time with your film :)
@gsalien2292
@gsalien2292 3 жыл бұрын
A most excellent presentation! Thank you!
@thebongtwister
@thebongtwister 3 жыл бұрын
This is the best thing about Arvin Ash, he explains complicated things so easily 😍
@pkmpkm03
@pkmpkm03 3 жыл бұрын
Every time I come here...I learn something new ❤️
@ian731
@ian731 3 жыл бұрын
I so from Brazil thank you By putting subtitles in Portuguese in your videos in Brazil is complicated so I hope you put more, love your videos, hugs =)
@bobbyshaftoe45
@bobbyshaftoe45 3 жыл бұрын
Arvin is a treasure. Wanna fix public schools? Find a million Arvins... a difficulty due to a similar rarity as that Feynman complexity/probability "1%" ratio thing he just described.
@gettothepoint_already3858
@gettothepoint_already3858 3 жыл бұрын
I think math would prove a million Arvins do not exist.
@saltycreole2673
@saltycreole2673 2 жыл бұрын
I've watched Feynman videos. He doesn't sound at all like the genius he was. More like a NY longshorman! The Feynman diagrams are genius.
@davedsilva
@davedsilva 3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant work Arvin. Thank you.
@ferencszabo3504
@ferencszabo3504 3 жыл бұрын
As always, very interesting material!
@Fitofmania
@Fitofmania 3 жыл бұрын
I LOVE ARVIN ASH !!!
@GardenChef
@GardenChef 3 жыл бұрын
the speed and calmness in voice in those earlier videos was better. the latest ones seem a lil too fast. may be coz i like to listen to them in peace . overall a great channel to subscribe
@gettothepoint_already3858
@gettothepoint_already3858 3 жыл бұрын
I didn't follow the math till we got to (+1 plus -1) = 0. That I got. That was about it. I did get the Feynman diagrams though. Bless that man; and Arvin too!
@nafeesaneelufer5023
@nafeesaneelufer5023 3 жыл бұрын
If the matter particle moves forward in time and antimatter particle moves backward in time then does it mean matter universe moves from past to future as we do and the antimatter universe moves from future to the past?
@rc5989
@rc5989 3 жыл бұрын
The positron does not move backward in time. The math is just the same “as if” a regular electron were going backwards. The arrow in the diagram tracks the ‘electronness’ and the total diagram observes the conservation of fermion number. +1 positron plus -1 electron equals 0 electron (a photon is emitted).
@gump1005
@gump1005 3 жыл бұрын
Maxwell was a true genius and Arvin Ash is a great presenter and explainer.
@Pospisk
@Pospisk 3 жыл бұрын
I am so excited for the upcoming video on QCD! :)) and also on a possible future video on Quantum Flavour Dynamics!
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 3 жыл бұрын
alas, flavor is so broken it's barely worth it.
@rotorblade9508
@rotorblade9508 3 жыл бұрын
It looks like time direction is given by whether you are made of particles or antiparticles but in both cases the entropy is seen as increasing.
@mathwithjanine
@mathwithjanine 3 жыл бұрын
Wow this is so fascinating! Thank you for sharing! :)
@cumaraxmed3107
@cumaraxmed3107 Жыл бұрын
What I can tell this great video. Next Richard feynman!! How you explain this complex things up. I really understand some how QED. Thanks so much
@BillyMcBride
@BillyMcBride 3 жыл бұрын
Great work, Arvin Ash! I am now wondering how many times these little photons happen over a period of time, and as a result, how much light from photons is in our universe? Math is our friend, and maybe there is an infinity to space and time, but there was so much you flew through so as to give someone like me food for thought for a long time.
@spinor
@spinor 3 жыл бұрын
I really wouldn't take this photon exchange stuff too seriously. Despite how they're often described, you have to always keep in mind that virtual photons are not real. What happens is when you calculate electromagnetic interactions, you can break the solution down into an infinite series of mathematical terms so that you can calculate them one at a time and add them together. It turns out these terms individually look like their own "interactions" which can be displayed using Feynman diagrams as described in the video. But these interactions aren't really happening. There's no infinite photons being emitted and absobed simultaneously, it's just what this so-called "perturbative expansion" looks like. The only real interaction is the one you get in the end when you add all the terms together (well, you can't add _all_ of them since there are an infinite number, but in the case of QED you can get a very good approximation with only a few terms. QCD is a different matter however, and the calculations get utterly horrible lol.)
@BillyMcBride
@BillyMcBride 3 жыл бұрын
@@spinor some plot.
@TaiNguyen-td4qf
@TaiNguyen-td4qf 3 жыл бұрын
Love it! I would be lying if I said I understood everything, but gosh dang, that's pretty interesting!!
@sarujanrupan4831
@sarujanrupan4831 3 жыл бұрын
The best physicists aren't the cleverest or most knowledgeable but one's that on top of these two can teach what they know...
@LowellBoggs
@LowellBoggs 3 жыл бұрын
Great graphics and script. Thanks!
@johnny_eth
@johnny_eth 3 жыл бұрын
Arvin could make a video about the warp drive and convince every teen to build one for their science fair.
@vedantsridhar8378
@vedantsridhar8378 3 жыл бұрын
He did already kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f9OZa5CjqM_HkYU.html
@GururajBN
@GururajBN 3 жыл бұрын
"That's coming up. Right now!" I admire the entusiasim with which he says this hallmark sentence. From 3.45 onwards, Arvin Ash explains the equation. I am a dud in mathematics. But, even I felt that I understood something. Thumbs up to this great teacher!
@johnlord8337
@johnlord8337 3 жыл бұрын
A great vid. The only issue is that the conventional magnet with such force field lines movement is wrong. It is a spiral of energy wrapping around the magnet N to S. And there is 2 movements of spiral energy. The weaker left hand movement of electrical force - and the stronger right hand movement of magnetic force - electromagnetism. Both spirals work in opposing movements and motions from either the N or S pole. All energy (wave physics) is a spiraling (and velocity) movement. Think of massive metal shocks on a car or truck. Think of a tinier door spring. Think of a Slinky toy. The sinusoidal movement of wave physics (on a 2D lab scope) does not show that the actual 3D representation that is actually looking sideways at a spiral spring. Look at a stretched out Slinky sideways and you will see wave physics. The higher the frequency of the wave, will be the smaller amplitude of the wave, and the higher velocity of that "particle." Such is the truth, merging wave physics (energy is a wave, Hertz frequency) and particle physics (light and energy are particles, Angstrom lengths). The actual truth is that the whole energy is a spiraling velocity of quark-matter. The manufacturing of quantum quark randomness in the displayed picture is the actual dark universe's interaction in all 3D (and 4D time) as the space-time fabric, the quantum sponge, the continuum, (the ancient's "aether" ... and the modern cosmology CMBR - cosmic microwave background radiation) pushing out all of the many quark compositions into the physical matter universe. Quarks, mesons, baryons, fermions, leptons, bosons, are all stable ;particles that continue to create physical matter. Unstable quark composites will quickly decay back into quarks and fall back into the dark universe.
@jessfucket
@jessfucket 10 ай бұрын
another winner explanation, Arvin!
@devashishshah9021
@devashishshah9021 3 жыл бұрын
Best science Channel!! Love it👌
@fardeenansari8568
@fardeenansari8568 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this knowledge
@harshavardhan9399
@harshavardhan9399 3 жыл бұрын
I don't know why people don't talk about entropy and uncertainty at the quantum level much. hey Arvin, please make a video on entropic gravity which make more sense than others
@sumsar01
@sumsar01 3 жыл бұрын
They do. It is called Von Neumann entropy. But for entropy to make sense you need an ensemble of particles. So if you do not have that it doesn't make sense to talk about.
@harshavardhan9399
@harshavardhan9399 3 жыл бұрын
@@sumsar01 thank you for your information
@tresajessygeorge210
@tresajessygeorge210 2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU DR.ARVIN ASH...!!!
@vrcreations3391
@vrcreations3391 3 жыл бұрын
I just passed out 10th and now I am moree interested in learning quantum physics stuff butt I just can't understand everything but I hope one day I will be able to grasp this in ma mind
@DMBall
@DMBall 4 ай бұрын
Ash skates right over the continuing problem of renormalization: the practice of jiggering the math so the "astounding" accuracy actually comes out right.
@eziowayne
@eziowayne 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this awesome video!
@BlackHole-qw9qg
@BlackHole-qw9qg 3 жыл бұрын
Best video of the channel !
@LuisLascanoValarezo
@LuisLascanoValarezo 3 жыл бұрын
You make videos very enjoyable. You have Talent!
@yasharthgautam2821
@yasharthgautam2821 3 жыл бұрын
Happy Deepawali Arvin and thanks for the great videos!!!
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Happy holidays!
@rogelv8td
@rogelv8td 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great videos man
@arthjai
@arthjai 3 жыл бұрын
Your next video should be on entropic gravity because it was second most voted topic on your poll and also I know nothing about it
@gautamgupta7860
@gautamgupta7860 3 жыл бұрын
You deserve 100M subs, love from🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Can I get a heart😁😁??
@ashmanideep6253
@ashmanideep6253 3 жыл бұрын
You said exactly what I wanted to say Such an underrated channel
@Bassotronics
@Bassotronics 3 жыл бұрын
🧡🤍💚
@atmikes1
@atmikes1 3 жыл бұрын
Very much appreciated ! thanks
@radwanparvez
@radwanparvez 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Your presentations really help me a lot. Got some questions: 1. The analogy for e- and e+ interaction was depicted by exchanging TWO basketball, but in the Feynman diagram, there's only one photon. Why? (Though, exchanging only one basketball would do the job I think) 2. There was fermion conservation by assigning e- = +1 and e+ = -1. What about boson conservation? Doesn't it lead to assign a virtual photon with a boson number 0? 3. If there's an uncountable(!) number of the virtual photon is exchanging in reality between two fermions, then where this information is given in the Lagrangian? And, is it uncountable?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
These are virtual photon exchanges. They are by definition not measurable.
@BackassWordsWeirdworld
@BackassWordsWeirdworld 3 жыл бұрын
Wow. So interesting and important. Thank you. God bless.
@clarkh3314
@clarkh3314 3 жыл бұрын
We love you brother, thank you, you're needed in the world.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that.
@clarkh3314
@clarkh3314 3 жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh :)
@catac83
@catac83 3 жыл бұрын
nice video as always Arvin.. finally a theory that is closer to reality, QED.. I just hope that physicists will target their efforts into theories that make actual predictions that can be tested and not in theories with mathematics that just work- like string theory- and predict 10 dimensions and 10 to the 500 universes but without any future hope of testing it.. I wanted to ask you, do you think that tiny black holes will be created in a lab in our lifetime or the scales are just too tiny for that? SO the question is, is there any hope that we ll find out what happens inside a black hole in the next 30 years or so?
@kamalnawhal9356
@kamalnawhal9356 3 жыл бұрын
You always made me excited ☺️
@lucasmergotto5267
@lucasmergotto5267 3 жыл бұрын
El libro "Jesús Fracasoó y Terminó en Desastre", basado en la ley de la atracción, el autor muestra cómo fue la vida de Jesús. Usa versículos de la biblia ... lo recomiendo, el libro es muy bueno. está en Amazon.
@kamalnawhal9356
@kamalnawhal9356 3 жыл бұрын
@@lucasmergotto5267 can you please say this in English
@lucasmergotto5267
@lucasmergotto5267 3 жыл бұрын
@@kamalnawhal9356 The book Jesus Failed and Ended up in Disaster, based on the law of attraction, the author shows what the life of Jesus was like. Use verses from the bible ... I recommend it, the book is very good. it's on Amazon.
@kamalnawhal9356
@kamalnawhal9356 3 жыл бұрын
@@lucasmergotto5267 okay I'm very obliged to you
@bilalrehmat6261
@bilalrehmat6261 3 жыл бұрын
thanku so much for converting complexity into simplicity
@davidsansom2553
@davidsansom2553 2 жыл бұрын
Great video incredibly fascinating and mind blowing. Feynman amazing also Dirac Schrodinger even Einstein of course Spacetime curvature matter energy Gravity acceleration etc.also Maxwell prediction from his equations for speed of light amount other incredible phenomenon
@tomgrimes8379
@tomgrimes8379 3 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU for taming the background audio. In previous videos, it sounds like Arvin is in a go-go lounge trying to explain stuff while someone does a pole dance just off camera. Previous videos in which the background audio is left wide open have been ruined. This is because there are both words and sentence fragments in those previous videos that are unintelligible because the background music is so (friggin!) loud. It would be worth the post-producer's time to go back and remix those sound tracks.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
I heard you loud and clear. We can't go back and repost the earlier videos - YT does not allow that. But we will be adjusting all future videos. Thanks for the feedback.
@robbes7rh
@robbes7rh 3 жыл бұрын
So this does allow a peek under the hood so to speak with some intuitive sense of the world somewhat intact. But the question that comes up for me is how many photons or virtual photons are carried around by electrons? Are electrons constantly emitting photons and virtual photons? Or do they just do so randomly when they run into a friend?
3 жыл бұрын
I want to ask Feynman , why he is so genius
@stevenverrall4527
@stevenverrall4527 Жыл бұрын
Great video! It would have been informative to relate the 1% probability to the fine-structure constant. It is important to note that this same theoretical framework fails when applied to the interior of a nucleus. For that reason, QED is not the most we can ever know about physics. A very different theory is needed to model and understand atomic nuclei. A recent attempt of mine is "Ground State Quantum Vortex Proton Model" published in Foundations of Physics.
@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668
@espaciohexadimencionalsern3668 3 жыл бұрын
9:57 My suggestion is that there cant be an electron with a positive charge and another with negative charge, the only difference there could be is just wight that is that the bottom ones are heavier than those on top and still they could be a left and a right in this case.
@bombdottcom111
@bombdottcom111 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Ash. Love your take! ;)
@sebastiannieves5874
@sebastiannieves5874 3 жыл бұрын
fantastic video!
@emiktra7929
@emiktra7929 3 жыл бұрын
Nobody answered my question if higer frequency signals mean more energy in photons. But you did!
@gautamgupta7860
@gautamgupta7860 3 жыл бұрын
I didn't understand what you are asking
@emiktra7929
@emiktra7929 3 жыл бұрын
@@gautamgupta7860 you know the color of the photons are related their frequency. And the frequency is dependant to their energy level. Photons are what light is made out of
@dreamyrhodes
@dreamyrhodes 3 жыл бұрын
Of course that's why UV radiation, X-ray and gamma are ionizing and damaging molecules
@emiktra7929
@emiktra7929 3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@bh2020_
@bh2020_ 3 жыл бұрын
Great Video!!!
@wendelsantana2190
@wendelsantana2190 3 жыл бұрын
Que vídeo incrível!!!
СҰЛТАН СҮЛЕЙМАНДАР | bayGUYS
24:46
bayGUYS
Рет қаралды 525 М.
ОДИН ДОМА #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
ELE QUEBROU A TAÇA DE FUTEBOL
00:45
Matheus Kriwat
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Quantum Electrodynamics and Feynman Diagrams
15:33
ScienceClic English
Рет қаралды 506 М.
Can Particles be Quantum Entangled Across Time?
35:19
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 168 М.
Discovering the relativistic Dirac equation with Paul Dirac and graphene
29:06
Professor NanoScience
Рет қаралды 21 М.
The Battle for REALITY: String Theory vs Quantum Field Theory
16:17
A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll
56:11
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
Why Does Light Exist? What is Its Purpose?
15:10
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 598 М.
Electrons DO NOT Spin
18:10
PBS Space Time
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
What Is A Particle? A Visual Explanation of Quantum Field Theory
14:02
Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong
1:00:18
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
#miniphone
0:18
Miniphone
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Power up all cell phones.
0:17
JL FUNNY SHORTS
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
Kalem ile Apple Pen Nasıl Yapılır?😱
0:20
Safak Novruz
Рет қаралды 300 М.