Isn’t already happening through crop circles and channeling? 😊

Solyent Green is people 😂

Explain more about dark energy

It was nice to give you guys that night on your screen that you look at and study

hi handsome great video.

Thankyou 👏🏽

So it sounds like the wave function doesn't collapse when observed but collapses when its wave function is turned into information? Don't physicist talk about information being retained in black holes now rather than matter or energy?

If universe is a fractal, then this could maybe also apply to star systems. Maybe number of planets is determined by the nature of the central star.

easily the best video on this! thank you soo much!

Really appreciate the video. Went through atomic physics class without animation and it was brain hemorrhage. The strong and strong nuclear forces appear to be more of fortifications of fixed radii rather similar to how electrons have fixed radii from atomic nuclei.

Those who know what it is wouldn't tell. But dRk matter absolutely does not exist.

Wow. Just wow. Ty so much for this video. I'm falling in love with your channel.

Great stuff....

What about the big bang being vacuum decay?

Doesn’t answer the very question the video meant to answer

Attosecond spectroscopy debunked the Heisenberg uncertainty principle Attosecond spectroscopy was used to observe the motion of the electron - electrodynamics

Using a nuclear reactor to heat water as the main coolant working fluid is quite ingenious and not primitive. Water is excellent at this task. Water has high heat retention and it blocks some of the radiation. It can be pumped so that the energy from the core becomes portable and can be transferred to somewhere else, usually to another loop of water that becomes steam to run an electrical turbine. Turbines are important because the AC electricity used in our distribution infrastructure is most easily generated by a rotating armature in a magnetic field.

There would be no causality violation because of the relative speed at which they are experiencing time. Multiple sci-fi shows have referenced this, but the best representation was in Stargate SG-1 S2E16 A Matter of Time. They were showing gravitational time dilation instead of velocity based, but the cause of time dilation is irrelevant to the concept. Time is experienced slower at higher gravity and faster at lower gravity in gravitational time dilation. Velocity based time dilation has time experienced slower at higher speed and faster when stationary. Exact calculations are likely impossible do to the constant presence of both gravity and velocity preventing any location being at absolute zero in either time dilation cause. The relative speed of time advancement would mean a message arriving in an accelerated or decelerated form. The graphic at 11:06 would have the message sent by Alice at instantaneous transmission speed arrive in a form that Bob might have to slow down in order to understand. Time would still be going forward for both of them, so his reply would appear to have taken a long time to arrive, and would need to be sped up to sound normal. The speed of time being different doesn't cause causality issues because both are moving forward in time. The more common argument made for FTL violating causality is arriving before the destination location sees that you left, but that is no different than the delay observed in a sonic boom.

Could it be that gravity waves power the electron in keeping it's orbit around atoms? Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love

@14:33 You said time was formed with it, but your example has you using something in an existing time, that doesn't work.....i would argue no case where something has a probability could "occur" in the absence of time, not necessarily the same "time" but no event can exist at no time. The reason i argue this point, some have ised the "theories" around the big bang (bad word to use without actual scientific evidence....it devalues the word for actual use)....to state that time definitely started with the singularity ...whatever the math suggests im not aware of any theory...actual theory....which has that included with "receipts" @16:13 thank you

I like your video and found it insightful, but I don’t agree with your conclusion. I think the researchers were correct when they implied retro-causality. I’m working on an experiment that will put this debate to rest.

MWI and Decoherence makes the most sense from a physics standpoint but I think the general public just can't relate from personal experience. The sense of self is so strong that people can't accept there are multiple self copies that they are not aware of

Honestly i thought we didn't know the mass or size of an electron precisely?

True conflicting information never stopped a paradox from existing in the first place did it?

What an unfortunate name.

The electron changing state which was basically Bohr 'digitizing' the entire universe, and is on the same scale than anything Einstein did. And Einstein said do in his memoirs. And yet it both amazed and bothered Einstein - he did not deny it. On the micro scale there is no "speed of light limit" that was so beloved of Einstein. The electron change of state is instant. There is still also great denial when it comes to entanglement. Again the speed of light is the issue. Nothing can go faster than light is the mantra? But the electron defies that and if so, then why should entanglement not also defy it? Is there a missing variable? Maybe the most revolutionary thing to say in science is that the missing variable is God? Who dares deny that possibility?

FYI failing centrifuge blow up! Ie major disaster for bad actors making weapons grade uranium or plutonium weapons

Excellent presentation.

Using mechanical limiting or analog controls will prevent this

Siemens is trash. They over compensate on their programming and over engineer solutions. I’ve experienced a higher mortality rate on their plcs than their competitors and more problems with their software. They make themselves out to be the only solution in Europe while shutting out the competition. They deserved stuxnet.

If we can't do it in a controlled lab how did it happen in a vent? Seems odd to me. We have spent billions of dollars and no luck.

This explanation of collision 💥 is nonsense God knows very well that at which angle the circumstances are suitable for life to survive

just unplug it

The big question is…what is the universe in? I’m in a chair, in a house, on a planet, in a galaxy, in a unverse, in a….? They say it’s expanding, but into what?

6:55 “ reconcile“ there’s nothing to reconcile. A constant speed of light is the same as the constancy of the laws of nature. There’s no contradiction.

6:32 “ consequence of massless photons“. no. it’s a consequence of Maxwells equations. Predicting the speed of electromagnetic waves. As a constant.

5:07 “ electromagnetic field at rest though spatially oscillating” no. it should not be oscillating. einstein should have been riding the wave front. observing no oscillation. 😮😮😮

Wow, that's exactly how I was imagining it. Some internet physicist was arguing with me that you can see in front of you while looking at the singularity behind the event horizon.

B4 the big bank i banked.

"Snow is white". Wow, I had no idea! And I suppose water is wet, right?

TWO ADVERTS? FILTHY CHANNEL

So what strings are made of ?😶

We have to start somewhere. Seems like a good point to begin

What is the name of the melodi at the end?

What is the name of the end melodi?

THIS IS WHY KZfaq analyst are dumb. There is no black holes.

There was nothing before God created life. God always was. He either always existed or nothing would exist

I like the way you talk and think, so im gunna assume you are the real deal and not an ai youtube production. yer the best out there mate, well done

So just agressive brute force

I run into a couple of drunk bozons at the bottle shop the other day